"Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty."
-- Ronald Reagan
"No beast is more savage than man, when possessed with power answerable to
his rage."
--- Plutarch
"Than politics the American knows no higher profession -- for it is the
most lucrative."
-- de Tocqueville
"If great writers have not at present existed in America, the reason is very
simply given in the fact that there can be no literary genius without
freedom of opinion, and freedom of opinion does not exist in America."
-- de Tocqueville
"You will eat by and bye
In the glorius land above the sky;
Work and pray,
Live on hay,
You'll get pie in the sky,
When you die."
--Joe Hill
"If there is any principle of the Constitution
that more imperatively calls for attachment
than any other it is the principle of free
thought -- not free thought for those who agree
with us but freedom for the thought that we
hate."
-- Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
My "Druthers" President is Llwellen Rockwell Jr. the libertarian
political philospher (who of course is not running or thinking of
running) -- if I were a man of means I would encourage him to run and
encourage you to support him -- but let me just mention him to you for the
purpose of discussing attributes of the candidate we really need right
ow -- and whom we are going to have to draft if we want anyone worht
having.
Putting all considerations of "realistic chances" and trying to hit a
responsive and, therefore, non-futile chord in my readers, if I were to name
the best philosopher king type president who would rule with wisdom and
character and for the real good of mankind and the polity -- I would pick
Llewellyn Rockwell Jr.
Rockwell is a libertarian, but let me explain. He is of the, like me,
Mises-Hayek-Rothbard "Austrian-school" of true libertarian/classical
liberal populism-consistent thinking, which is is NOT the
anarcho-capitalist thinking of, such sonsobitches asAlan Greenspan's
handlers inside the FED, or U. Chicago law professor Richard Epstein, or
Harvard MBA/JD Michael Rothschild. These latter are the ones who, under the
same "libertarian" label, promote a "defense of property" but only after the
state-abdicated power of money-circulation manipulation and other
"rigged-game" frauds and plunderings (the 9-11 for-profit mass-murder
frame-up is one example, the Great Depression, both of World Wars are
others, "Great Society" veiled social sabotage, and the debt-financed Cold
War arms race are others -- anyone want to argue this with me? Only when
nations like the US, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Iraq, all of Africa, the
former "Tiger" economies of Asia and the Pacific rim etc. have had the
people's wealth and the wealth of the people's governments completely
plundered, privatized and debt enslaved (creating corresponding
interesting-paying assets for the anarcho-capitalists), only then does a
Richard Epstein enter the scene and turning a blind eye to all of the
anti-libertarian coercion and fraud that has built these ill-gotten fortunes
for the pirates of the earth, does he argue (e.g., in his book "Takings")
that "eminent domain" absolutely protects provate property and that the
Constitution and the principles at its base forbid any legislation that has
the effect of redistributing private persons' wealth accumulations (the
real ideological hand that sculpted the Bush tax cuts.) I am sure you all
see the Epstein's error, but to clarify my own thinking let me state it for
myself: Epstein neglects two facts. He ignores the reality that private
money, in the form of privately owned international merchant banks,
privatley control the rules of markets and the "measure of value" and the
worth of the unit of the "store of value" as well all legislation making
the rules underwhich "the market mechanism" will function - whereas in a
true libertarian state (Mises, Hayek, Rothbard, Rockwell) the state is not
influenced by market players but creates a legal structure of the laws under
which exchange, contract and property all obtain -- so as to avoid
situations where, say, in playing the parlor board game "Monopoly" the
richest player does not get to rewrite the rules and mix his money with that
of the "banker." To the true libertarian, the optimum legal structure is
set up (as the US Founding Fathers set of the US Constitution) and
checks-and-balances to keep accumulations of private power from taking
control and "rigging" the game. But Anarch-capitalism does not view the
national economy and the common weal as the desired goal -- the nation of
laws ain't shit to Michael Rothschild, who views -- with 9-11 frame-up
conspirator Newt Gingrich ( to name just one of the many sonsobitches
building his politics around Rothschild's "corporation-merchantilism
principle," as I hereby dub it) -- as I was saying, who views the primary
"organisms" on this planet deserving care and nurture to be, not the
individual, not humanity, not the nation state, not the human species
population, its standard of living, its medium and long-term prospect as the
things to be looked to and maximized, but rather the global jungle of
evolving wealthy-family owned and controlled companies, the
corporation-elite-family nexus! To corporations, according to Rothschild,
is the only law of survival that matters, that policy makers and "global
governance" should be concerned about. His view is consonant with the
remark of Samuel Clemens, "What is the cheif end of man? -- To get rich.
Win what way? -- dishonestly if he can; honestly if he must. There is no
ethics, no morality, no sanction of a holy spirit, no compassion, no
consideration beyond that imperative -- build the jungle for the ease and
growth of the biggest predators -- never telling you that corporations are
merely totalitiarian states without borders or constitutions or obligations
that they do not choose to incur under the proit-max principle. The
investment banker is master of his universe, and nations and peoples are but
the cows and draw horses of his global plantation. Corporations are not
entrepreneurial -- they tend to destroy competitors by rigging the game,
not by out-competing in terms of better "mousetraps" at lower cost etc.
Corporations are not innovative -- they thrive on destroying the other
man's better ideas, buying up their patents and hiding them in their vaults,
so that their monopoly pricing, their profit-making can go on -- and to
hell with the efficiencies and human betterment that might have been.
Corporations don't know what consumers want. They do not know what
localities need. They do not do "market research" to guide the development
of products people really want and need, rather they do maket research to
"sell" what they don't really need (like renting a monster movie, or
buying your kid a China-manufactured plastic action figure based on that
monster movie and the little toy in your corporation hamburger outlet "kid's
meal) etc. Notice the candy bars next to every cash register waiting line
in every grocery store, you who are trying to loose weight and who have
small children in tow. Notice the tabloid newspapers that fill your mind
with meretricious filth and grotesque and trivial and gross trash as you
wait in line (just so you don't discussing real headlines of the real news
as you, for the only time of the week when you actually stand close to your
neighbors and can actually talk to them -- some of the biggest billionaire
families owning the candy bar companies and the tabloids. Hey, why not --
the candy corporations and the tabloid corporations paid the grocery retail
corporations for the privilege right -- what do you have to say about it?
THAT IS THE MICHAEL ROTHSCHILD IDEAL OF THE KIND OF ENVIRONMENT MOST
CONDUCIVE TO THE SUSTAINABLE PRESERVATION AND WELL-BEING OF THE CORPORATION
ORGANISM, THE HIGHEST VALUE OF ANARCHO-CAPITALISTS.
Damn, there I go again. Lost you all, didn't I?
At any rate, as I was saying, Llwellen Rockwell Jr. is not an
anarcho-capitalist, he is a libertarian, a believe in the liberty of
mankind. And that is why he, and not Michael Rothschild or Richard Epstein,
wrote the following:
>From The Madness of President George , Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.,
...Why is he dangerous? He is willfully ignorant of what is going on in Iraq
but cocksure that not only is he doing the right thing, but that God is
blessing and directing his every decision, even to the point that he
imagines himself to be infallible (or, rather, if he is not infallible, he
cannot generate any evidence of fallibility when asked).
Why is he one of the most dangerous? Because he autocratically heads the
most powerful and well-armed state in the history of the world. He not only
has his finger on the button. He has access to many thousands of weapons of
mass destruction, and has shown himself to be willing to use them against
anyone he regards as a foe. By comparison to his predecessor in the White
House, Bush is alarming, the kind of president who seems capable of blowing
up the world and calling it good.
Let them live out their fantasies of death and dominion with toys rather
than the real world.
(I know that articles like this are supposed to be dispassionate in order to
be more persuasive. I am supposed to recite the facts without rhetoric to
provide a kind of slowly burning buildup in order to convert those who think
George is nothing but a godly man heading the free world's efforts to
protect itself against barbaric enemies. But the situation in which we live
is so desperate, it seems to call forth more frank talk. People who are
still defending George don't need patient argument; they need shock
therapy.)
If you doubt that what I say here is true, see the transcript. In much of
what he says, he gets the truth exactly backwards in ways that anyone who
reads the news can discern. He admits (for the first time?) that the US is
militarily occupying Iraq but claims that those who resist are rejecting
"freedom" and "self government." This is like the rapist giving sermons on
the need to respect the physical integrity and dignity of his victims.
The occupier who announces to the people through a bullhorn "Submit or Die!"
has some chutzpah claiming to be a liberator. This is beyond Orwell. It's
evil, crazy, or both. The officer who said this ought to have his badges of
rank ripped off. The president who ignores this ought to be impeached. The
politicians who are ablaze in the face of it ought to be voted out of
office. Websites that reviewed that speech the way they review a movie or
play (yes, that's you NRO) ought to suffer everlasting disgrace.
We must first deal with the problem that George seems genuinely mad. There
was a riddle in nearly every sentence. He spoke like someone dramatically
out of touch with what everyone else knows. The whole scene was a bit wacky,
as if the uncle who everyone knows is crazy came to the family reunion and
was humored because he is family. People were going easy on George just
because he seemed like he was speaking about another planet.
Now, here we have a "war" that has proven to be a complete calamity in every
conceivable way. The blood and violence are ghastly. It started as a war for
democracy and American values and it is ending in body bags, a radicalized
population, hundreds of billions wasted, and an emboldened horde of
terrorists from all countries. The original rationales for the war are
proven hoaxes. The soldiers hate it. The Iraqis hate the soldiers. US
trained Iraqis are AWOL. We are talking here about a war disaster of
historic proportions, even for the aggressor state.
The press, though, seemed somehow reluctant to point this out, as if George
had his finger on a button he could push that would blow them all up.
Instead, the press, very gingerly, put him on the couch. What mistakes had
he made? Are there things he would do differently? Just asking, George. Not
hinting at a thing. Don't take this wrong. Just a normal sort of question
every president is asked. Do you think there have been any judgment errors
at all? Everyone makes mistakes, you know; nothing to be ashamed of.
Nope, said George, nothing he can think of. It was almost cartoonish. But in
real life, it is extremely scary. The press was evidently confused by the
whole scene, their eyes darting back and forth to each other in bemusement.
The efforts to report on the event the next day were similarly strained. The
headlines could have run: "President Bush Has Gone Off the Rails." But since
press etiquette demands he be treated with great deference, the stories were
all variations of: "George Bush today pledged to continue the offensive in
Iraq, while denying his administration has made errors in judgment."
George isn't the first and certainly won't be the last crazy president.
Power tends to do this to people. The sin of mass murder also does it. It
makes them callous, nuts, dangerous. The answer is not to replace him with
Kerry, or Clinton, or Carter, or some other person who seems more peaceful
in some way. Bush also seemed rather peaceful during the election.
The urgent moral priority of our time is to dismantle the warfare state,
disarm the nukes, roll back the empire from every corner of the globe. We
want to live in a country even a crazy man can head and not have it be
dangerous for us or the world. If George or his successors want to play
violent games, someone could just bring them a set of plastic army men and
they could have at it all day in the West Wing. Let them live out their
fantasies of death and dominion with toys rather than the real world.
Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. is president of the Ludwig von Mises Institute in
Auburn, Alabama, editor of LewRockwell.com and author of Speaking of
Liberty.
Copyright Š 2004 LewRockwell.com
=====================
TRUTHBAZOOKA:
Berg murder was another frame-up by Anglo-American-Israeli black-ops.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagonconspiracy/message/51
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pentagon911/message/214
The alleged Berg execution is a hoax. To explain this stance we take a
closer look at the events happened around that time.
http://hamasonline.org/index.php?itemid=646
The U.S. like always needs to divert attentions when they get negative
attention, during Monica Lewinski scandal the U.S. decided to bomb a
Afghanistan and Sudan for no reason and without any prove that they where
behind any anti-U.S attacks. When the U.S. stocks dropped the U.S. went to
war with Iraq and in the past there are numerous examples of same thing
happening over and over again.
This time with the rape and abuse pictures and video's from Iraqi prisons
and streets the criminals in the Whitehouse again needed to divert the
negative attention they where receiving from around the world.
We will put some strange things down to support the stance regarding
authenticity of the video.
- Nick Berg was wearing an orange jumpsuit - just like US prisoners
wear.
- Berg was last seen alive on 10 April, when his father Michael Berg
believes he was killed - two weeks before the Abu Ghraib prisoner
abuse scandal broke in the world's media. (Tape claimed the
execution was retaliation for Iraqi prisoner abuse).
- The body is completely motionless even as the knife is brought
to bear - not so much as an instinctive wriggle.
- It is natural that when the throat artery is cut, it would cause a
significant amount of blood. But little emerges and when the
head was raised - not a drop of blood is seen to fall.
- Additionally, some have pointed out that his last email on 6 April
to his family stated he wished to return home as soon as
possible - yet the FBI claim he refused an offer of help to get
home. (In the wider press, FBI involvement has also generated
much discussion as to why Berg was really arrested and
detained for two weeks in Mosul.)
- A US newspaper claims an official familiar with the case
knew that FBI agents had interrogated Berg, but had left him
for two weeks because he was in Iraqi - not American - custody.
- The Jordanian accused of the beheading Berg is himself
believed to have been killed in March, according to two Islamic
groups.
An eight-page leaflet circulated this week in Falluja, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
was killed in the Sulaimaniya Mountains of northern Iraq during a US
bombing.
But even if it was the Jordanian, his face is so well-known that "why would
he bother to cover it?"
Now you perhaps still think that the U.S. would never execute one of its
own. Then you should ask yourself the question why the U.S. invaded Iraq
knowing it had no WMD like it is proven now to the whole world. This led to
the death of more then 700 invaders of U.S. nationality alone.
The U.S. needed to boost its support to continue this unjust war for its
evil agenda. It should be no surprise if later in the future when these
Zionist controlled regimes (republicans and democrats) of the U.S. have
fallen and are replaced with independent and free government it comes to
light that the Pentagon has secretly awarded Nick Berg a medal for "his"
sacrifice for the sake of the evil agenda of the current U.S. regimes.
If you want to know where the killers are, then you dont have to look
further then Washington DC, U.S. The Americans have brought such cruel
sadistic regime down on them selves. How many lies should a government tell
before the Americans even TRY to open their eyes.
By Taahir - HamasOnline admin
a part of the info source is credited to Al-Jazeera
Palestinian houses to be demolished as potential "firing positions" for
"terrorists." Unofficial but well-informed estimates put the total of
houses demolished in Rafah in the latest operation at about 100, an
exceptionally high toll for a single operation. Israel Radio said earlier
that the army planned to demolish hundreds of buildings close to the road,
to remove firing positions or cover for potential attackers. But an army
spokesman said that a number of options were being considered as a means of
increasing security in the road.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=521441
American Moslems targeted by US Southerners following Berg murder. Three
South Florida Islamic institutions have reported vandalism and threats in
recent days as Muslims nationwide are experiencing a backlash to recent
events in Iraq. The Miami-Dade Police Department is investigating.
tp://tinyurl.com/38sly
Oil prices have vaulted to a 21-year high on the oil companies own
unverifiable word of a need to raise prices on account of suddenly
discovered scarcities and on geometrically expanding industrialization of
China, has placed world supplies under increasing strain, leaving OPEC,
except for its top producer Saudi Arabia, pumping almost flat out to meet
demand. Runaway Chinese consumption has sucked supplies away from other
regions and
eroded Asia's cushion of spare refining capacity. More than 1,000 new cars
hit the roads of Chinese capital Beijing each day as vehicle ownership
widens, and even as lower income Americans are cutting back on car ownership
and use, there continues to be growing numbers of low-mileage-per-gallon
sports utility vehicles on America's highways.
See, for example:
http://tinyurl.com/2r5ed
Tennessee police harass innocent Israelis while Arab terrorsts behead
Americans and plot big new attacks on US, right?
Two Israelis arrested after high-speed chase in Tennessee
The Associated Press
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/04/05/HeraldTrib_090504.html
ERWIN, Tenn. -- Two Israeli men who led the Unicoi County sheriff on a
high-speed chase in a rented moving truck were placed under arrest and are
being investigated by the FBI, local officials said.
Shmuel Dahan and Almaliach Naor, both from Israel, were being held without
bond Sunday afternoon at the Unicoi County Jail. The truck, rented from a
Ryder office in Mars Hills, N.C., was being held in the county garage
pending an FBI investigation, officials said.
Dahan is charged with reckless driving, littering, false identification and
evading arrest, while Naor faces charges of false identification and
evading arrest, an officer with the Unicoi County Sheriff's Department who
would not give his name said Sunday.
An investigation by the FBI is ongoing and more charges are possible, he
said. A woman who answered the phone at the FBI's Knoxville office said
there was no one available to answer questions about the arrest.
The incident began late Saturday afternoon [May 8, 2004] when Sheriff Kent
Harris noticed a rental truck traveling at a high speed along former U.S.
Highway 23, a lightly-traveled highway near the North Carolina state line.
"I was really concerned because the driver would not stop after I flashed
my headlights for nearly three miles," Harris said. "He was weaving back
and forth and I was wondering what a large (rental truck) was doing on the
two-lane highway late Saturday afternoon instead of the faster I-26
Interstate."
Harris said he saw the men throw something from the truck while they were
being pursued. Officers scouring the area later found a vial containing an
unknown substance along the roadway, he said. Once the men were
apprehended, officers also found a "Learn to Fly" brochure in the truck,
leading Harris and others to express concern about security at the Nuclear
Fuel Services plant in Erwin. "I got a sick feeling when I saw it," Harris
said.
Dahan also gave authorities a fake Florida driver's license issues in
Plantation, Fla., he said, while Naor produced a fake identification card.
Harris subsequently contacted the FBI, the federal Bureau of Tobacco and
Firearms and other local authorities to look into the situation.
"We're not overreacting," Harris said. "We have a responsibility to protect
the citizens of Unicoi County and that's what I'm going to do at any cost.
I'd rather overreact, if that's what you call it, than be sorry later."
=====================
Here is the critical information needed to derive an informed
opinion of what really happened on at the Pentag on
September 11, 2001:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/message/5
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
INDEX OF PROOF
1. Pentagon security camera shows
a. Too short a plane
b. Smoke trail of a missile being fired
c. White-hot flash explosion consistent with a missile warhead
2. Photos show wrong crash imprint in the wall
3. Photos show and wrong flash-powder burn darkening the wall
4. Downed lampposts and witness consensus each identify
a different approach path to the Pentagon, the Boeing's
and the killer jet's and they are mutually incompatible --
(path of sighted Boeing also inconsistent with civil
engineers reported "50 degree- angle of entry" -- witnesses
reporting the Boeing coming over the Sheraton Hotel, the
Naval Annex, the Citgo gas station, and the southernmost
extremity of Arlington National Cemetery -- an angle much
closer to perpendicular to the wall)
5. Wrong kind of debris
6. Single piece of right kind of debris shown to have been
found on the opposite side of the approach path from
the side of the plane where that particular piece had
to have come from.
7. Witnesses also
a. heard a missile
b. heard a sonic boom prior to blast
c. smelled burning chordite after the blast
d. saw a radar blip behaving like a jet-fighter blip
8. No photos of wreckage from inside consistent with the crash
9. Evidence of only one engine and one seat , a pilots seat.
10. A distraction plane, a four- engine plane making dives
over D.C. both photographed, videotaped and shown
on BBC, and reported (erroneously) by many wintesses
as the actual plane "diving at an irrecoverable angle)
11. The attack was made almost horizontally into the first-floor
level -- consistent with a countour-hugging jet-fighter attack
12. Normal rescuers were prevented from entering the building
while only certain people, including Rumsfeld himself, conducted
(screened) victims from the building
13. Rumsfeld had recently been given exclusive power to
OK air interceptions -- and yet he was in his office the whole
time the twin towers were hit, and when the Pentagon was
hit he went to oversee "rescue" instead of going to the situation
room where his interception authority could be given -- he
arrived at the situation room at about the time the Pennsylvania
plane (backup for the Pentagon) was finally shot down.
14. The various drills and practices for an air attack on the Pentagon
including some kind of simulation on 9-11-01 itself, coupled with
denials that such an attack had been considered possible.
15. Impossible stories by, for example, John Judge (regarding
his amazing stewardess friend who claims to have seen the
Boeing inside the hole, recognized the plane as the one she
always flew, recongized her stewardess friend as a victim by
a photo of her severed arm with the matching "friendship
bracelett" they both wore; that she was passing out
doughnuts and coffee to the rescue workers with the salvation
army when the salvation army was nowhere in evidence at the
scene -- John Judge who is a professional JFK conspiracy
theory debunker and discloses that this same stewardess
friend is also a JFK theory investigator, the same
John Judge who launched the phony "People's Investigation
of 9-11 with a press conference by stating that the Pentagon
attack is not something responsible investigators should bother
investigating etc. since we "know" the Boeing hit the Pentagon
and don't want to be a laughing stock etc. -- the People's
investigation that never once reviewed any of the evidence
packages I posted to them -- the same John Judge who to this
day refuses to debate Dick Eastman on any internet forum and
whom all -- dare I use the term -- "responsible" 9-11 investigators
think is a John Judge who is working for the coverup, for
obstruction of justice, and because he does it so badly is himself
become one of the proofs of the frameup along with the known-
only-to himself flight attendant who works one of the flights that
most definitely had to have been regularly monitored by
US intelligence operatives, probably flight attendents, and
this one just happened not to take Flight 77 that day by
happenstance etc. -- so how about it, Mr. Judge?
16. The deaths of only the CIA's indepdendent intelligence
revivals , the Offices of Naval Intelligence personel, and
auditors of defense spending contracts etc. alone moved
into the "newly renovated" section that was hit -- on the side
where most of the witnesses would be the Arlington Cemetery
dead or people involved with driving their cars. Naval Intelligence
would have independently investigated 9-11 had they lived --
the investigator that no official has yet conducted -- Wolfowitz
sure bin Laden had done it and ready with the solution of invading
Afganistan on the very first day -- even as they were allegedly
taken by complete suprise only a few hours before that
determination.
See the evidence photos and witness testimony confirming all of the
above and further analysis in support of these conclusions by
internationally respected American men of science here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/message/5
and here
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
WARNING: Don't pass Crother's article on -- half way through it he shows
his true pro-war pro-Zionist colors -- the piece is simply a trial balloon
for new packaging for plunderhawks, possibly on behalf of the Kerry
campaign.
=================
As I read the first half of Hal Crowther's article I quickly became
convinced that I was reading the great transition article that I had been
hoping some establishmentarian journalist would write. It was in the middle
of the following paragraph, however, that everything fell flat, so that like
the chimp teased and tormented by juvenile delinquents at the zoo, I was
ready to throw my feces at this crafty sonofabitch.
It was almost like he, a really good writer, had been reading my posts and
was giving them their first well-written and well-organized exposition when
he started out -- but then look how he cunningly switches to what is
doubltless a trial balloon for Kerry's coming new tack in his campaign --
for Crowther is still a
war-on-terror-homeland-security-patriot-act-lets-take-down-another-Afganista
n denier of reality after all. He has just given up what the Iraqis and hard
truth had already taken from him -- belief in the Iraq policy. Crowther
changes from savior to mugger, turning on a dime.
Here is the paragraph:
"If our presidential election fails to dislodge the crazy bastards who
annexed Baghdad, many of us in this country would welcome regime change by
any intervention, human or divine. But if, say, the Chinese came in to
rescue us--Operation American Freedom--how long would any of us, left-wing
or right, put up with an occupying army teaching us Chinese-style democracy?
A guerrilla who opposes an invading army on his own soil is not a terrorist,
he's a resistance fighter. In Iraq we're not fighting enemies but making
enemies. As Richard Clarke and others have observed, every dollar, bullet
and American life that we spend in Iraq is one that's not being spent in the
war on terrorism. Every Iraqi, every Muslim we kill or torture or humiliate
is a precious shot of adrenaline for Osama and al Qaeda. "
Let's get this straight:
Osama bin Laden died before 9-11, making him the perfect uncatchable villian
with which to thread together all of the wars that 9-11 calculated to
instigate.
9-11 was a an inside-job false-flag mass-murder as readily proven by the
following photographic evidence from the black-op attack on the Pentagon
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/message/5
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
Hostile-to-America mass-murdering Zionism allied with China has captured
our foreign policy, our intelligence agencies, our defense department,
Congress and our tax revenues and they are using their control to force
Uncle Sam to point his own gun at his own temple and pull the trigger.
However, Crowther merely sees that "Iraq" was a mistake -- what a
compartmentalized sonofabitch.
Watch and see, Kerry is going to re-emerge sounding like Crowther -- the
cosmetic no-change -- seeing the writing on the wall, this narrow face-it
admission, is just a "patch" to continue the same pro-death and pro-ruin
Zionist policies.
Make sure Crowther sees this, will you?
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
=======================