Re: Analysis: Elections not a referendum on Obama
Canuck57
> The inclination by some Democrats seeking reelection next year might be to run
> away from Obama and chart an independent path believing that he was at least
> partially to blame for the defeats of Corzine and Deeds. But Democratic
> strategists and activists caution that this is the wrong decision to make. In
> order to win in 2010, these Democrats said candidates need to embrace the
> president and embrace his policy goals.
They can run all they want, but lib-dims supported this fiasco going on
right now. They didn't say "misappropriation" when TARP was used for
auto bailouts. Hell, they even delibertly supported it by their
appathy! They even passed the TARP funds bill!
TARP and bailouts has turned out to be a massive out of control
corruption spend. A conspiracy to defraud taxpayers for the corrupt and
the greedy. Now a democrat senate/congress person wants us to forget?
With the economy still on a technical decline, people are starting to
realize liberalism touting democrats need to be removed. All they are
doing is racking up record amounts of debt for the taxpayer to pay for
and no results to show for it.
No results because not one lib-dim effort addresses the real causes of
the depression. Not a one. In fact, they make it worse by racking up
more insolvant debt. And Amerca has nothing to show for the $1.3
trillion debt spend frenzy going on.
5265 Dead, 398 since 1/20/09
> Danny O'Neil wrote:
>
>> The inclination by some Democrats seeking reelection next year might be
>> to run away from Obama and chart an independent path believing that he
>> was at least partially to blame for the defeats of Corzine and Deeds.
>> But Democratic strategists and activists caution that this is the wrong
>> decision to make. In order to win in 2010, these Democrats said
>> candidates need to embrace the president and embrace his policy goals.
>
> They can run all they want, but lib-dims supported this fiasco going on
> right now. They didn't say "misappropriation" when TARP was used for
> auto bailouts. Hell, they even delibertly supported it by their
> appathy! They even passed the TARP funds bill!
And I bet not one voter in a thousand in Virginia or NJ considered TARP
when they cast their ballots.
>
> TARP and bailouts has turned out to be a massive out of control
> corruption spend. A conspiracy to defraud taxpayers for the corrupt and
> the greedy. Now a democrat senate/congress person wants us to forget?
>
> With the economy still on a technical decline, people are starting to
> realize liberalism touting democrats need to be removed. All they are
> doing is racking up record amounts of debt for the taxpayer to pay for
> and no results to show for it.
>
No, it need to be IMPLEMENTED. The economy IS in decline (there's
nothing "technical" about it, no matter how much Wall Street crows that
happy days are here again) and Obama's main failing is that he hasn't
pushed hard enough for economic stimulus.
> No results because not one lib-dim effort addresses the real causes of
> the depression. Not a one. In fact, they make it worse by racking up
> more insolvant debt. And Amerca has nothing to show for the $1.3
> trillion debt spend frenzy going on.
And yet virtually all of that debt was racked up by Republicans. Imagine
that.
Lamont Cranston
> And Amerca has nothing to show for the $1.3
> trillion debt spend frenzy going on.
It's called "deficit spending." The CBO projected a deficit
of $1.2 trillion weeks before Obama took office, so who
should we blame it on? Hint: His initials are GWB.
John Q Public
Denial is a liberal mainstay
See how fast the moderates in Dem party run from healthcare and cap &
tax... now,
Many Dems are saying no votes on either this year.
The dems implosion continues and 2010 gonna be soooo effin funny