letter to uni of Vienna
jos boersema
To: inter...@...l.com
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: real change
Reply-To:
Hi University uprising Viena (?),
I read you where occupying several Universities in Austria,
with demands for social change.
I was wondering whether you where looking either to redress
your own problems in the context of the wider system, or
whether you where looking to solve the economic and state
corruption problems in all Austria for all people, even
world wide ?
The following site I made, which contains economic science
resulting in a new Constitution: http://www.davidwe.nl
I urge you to please study real economics for a change, and
not the capitalist/socialist nonsense. Now that you are
occupying the uni, you have a wonderful change to do real
science for a change !!!
Essentially: a trade economy has to work on trading effort,
not power. Major soil ownership is power. Ownership of
production groups (aka companies) is power. Ownership of
investment capital is power, and investment capital is most
profitable where labor is abused in the largest possible
dictatorial corporations. By allowing these mechanisms in
the economy, a corrupt nation and world are the result.
The solution is: a free trade economy, because this protects
the people who produce. Free trade in services, products,
labor. But: soil must be distributed, not traded and especially
not massively owned like in the feudal system (soil ownership
is very important to farmers, who are the base of society).
Companies must be free to start up, to protect the dynamics of
the free markets which should lead to their balancing prices
(now horribly distorted by power trading and capital investment.)
But companies should be handed in ownership to the employees
once the original starter leaves, and if the corporation has
enough people in it to warrant a democracy (i proposed: 10 or
more.) This may seem 'accidental' or 'ad-hoc' but it isn't, it
makes sense and is logical if you review the ownership and effort
issues. Investment capital must be invested (sparsely) in the
common interest. That means nationalization of all investment
capital, only handing some permits to good causes if they act
in accord with the public will (note that nationalization of
capital now requires the installation of a new currency).
When putting the power of finance under the Government, that
government must be benevolent. The way to achieve that is through
democracy. What we have now is clearly not going to do it, the
neo-Roman model. Therefore I've made up a new model.
These issues are also worked out into ways how to nationally
implement it. There are 4 modes that can/have to be followed:
- Buying as much fair trade as possible, restoring balance in the
economy through consumer activism. That is saying "the quality
we are looking for in our products is fairness."
- Organizing investment funds that invest in corporations that
engage with us in a legal contract to become democracies when
the starter leaves. Also we can help demorcatized corporations
with credit.
- Organize political parties. The political parties are to be
several, say at least 5 in Austria, all on the same program.
If one corrupts, it can be split and/or ppl can move to the
other parties (opposite strategy from the marxists). These
parties would internally practice with the proposed constitution:
i made a 239 law / 9 chapters constitution to destribe these issues
in a strict way. This will yield knowledge of the new system for
once the constitution is changed to the new system, and work to
keep the party top clean.
- Revolution. Mass strike, group in the streets to select representatives
following the protocol and erecting a new government from scratch.
http://www.socialism.nl/~joshb/sheet3.txt
See also http://www.socialism.nl/gov.html about government system.
I have heard you have organized into groups presently. Maybe if you
feel my proposals make sense you could form a group to study these
issues ? Once satisfied with quality, you could even organize based
on this constitution right at the uni, to the degree possible. That
would for sure be an interesting occurance.
In my system of government there are "rank" (position, it's not a
military hierarchy) symbols. I'm not sure with how many people you
are ? But you can simply make smaller the "voter groups" until you
reach at least 50. That way you could at least for one council
(a proto-local government, or a national government if you declare
sovereignty). I would think it being an excellent idea actually.
Also to really go a bit crazy with it, and install a judiciary,
a police, a high court, and an electoral committee (maybe not a
head of state, but if you like you could; but that would probably
be a little too weird, and you risk it being misunderstood and
becoming tyranical; but if you elect a nice trustworthy honorable
person there it could still function).
This way you might gain valuable training in the art of setting up
this new system, and in how it functions. It may also help your
university uprising to achieve a sense of calm because of all the
protocol and due process going on. That in turn might impress the
nation, and could help spread this kind of revolution ?
best regards,
jos boersema (1974)
Wibenaheerd 351
9736 PZ Groningen
The Netherlands
(Is this the correct e-mail adress??).
PS
If you are flying any skull & bones flags, I kindly request you do
not fly my flag also, thank you.