How the White House Covered Up Benghazi

[ПЈö'Донован]

MAY
14
How the White House Covered Up Benghazi

"Barack Obama's election campaign oratory had proclaimed the death of
Osama bin Laden as an accomplishment of his administration, as part of
a general defeat of Al-Qaeda and other terrorists. To admit that these
terrorists were still in action, and strong enough to kill an American
ambassador and three other Americans in a well-coordinated military
style attack, would be a politically devastating admission during the
election campaign.

Far better, politically, to come up with a story about a protest
demonstration that just got out of hand. This could be presented as an
isolated, one-time event, rather than part of a continuing pattern of
terrorism by groups that were still active, despite President Obama's
spin suggesting that they were not.

The problem with telling a lie, or even a succession of lies, is that
a very small dose of the truth can sometimes make the whole thing
collapse like a house of cards. The State Department's own foreign
service officer Gregory Hicks was in Libya during the attack, so he
knew the truth. When threats were not enough to silence him, it was
then necessary to try to discredit him.

After years of getting glowing job evaluations, and awards of honors
from the State Department for his work in various parts of the world,
Mr. Hicks suddenly began to get bad job evaluations and was demoted to
a desk job in Washington after he spoke with a Congressman about what
he knew. The truth is dangerous to liars.

The Obama administration's excuse for not trying to get help to the
Americans in Benghazi while they were under attack -- namely, that it
would take too long -- is as shaky as its other statements. A small
fighting unit in Tripoli was ready to get on a plane to Benghazi when
they were ordered to "stand down." Other fighting units located
outside of Libya are designed precisely for fast deployment -- and
nobody knew how many hours the attack would last.

But it will take more investigations to determine who gave the order
to "stand down," and why. How many new lies that will generate is
another question."

[Alias]

The day after the attack, Obama called it an act of terror. Oops.

--
Alias

[:ПеаБраин]

.................................................................................................................................

> The day after the attack, Obama called it an act of terror. Oops.
>
> --

> AliASS

"Despite knowing Benghazi was a terrorist attack from the very
beginning, after all she was briefed by Hicks who was on the ground,
Clinton shamelessly stood in front of the flag draped caskets of dead
Americans and blamed a YouTube video anyway. Watch starting at the 6
minute mark.

"We've seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an
awful internet video that we had nothing to do with. It is hard for
the American people to make sense of that, because it is senseless and
totally unacceptable."

Shortly after, when violence in the Middle East was raging, President
Obama in partnership with Hillary Clinton spent $70,000 in taxpayer
money on a commercial that aired on Pakistani television apologizing
for the "video."

And then of course, Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice went on five
Sunday talk shows to blame the video

And so did President Barack Obama and White House Press Secretary Jay
Carney.

"It is in response to a video." -Jay Carney September 14, 2012.

President Barack Obama blamed the irrelevant video in front of the
world at the United Nations. Not to mention, Obama described the man
who made the video, who is still in jail after being dragged out of
his house and arrested in the middle of the night, a "shadowy
character."

"It was a crude and disgusting video. I have made it clear the United
States government had nothing to do with this video."

Hillary Clinton lied, Rice lied, Barack Obama lied, Jay Carney lied,
the Obama administration lied. The men in Libya were left to die as
military forces were told to stand down.

Bring on the perjury hearings. What difference does it make? A big
difference."

Slain Benghazi Officer's Mom: Obama, Clinton, Rice All Blamed the ...
cnsnews.com › News‎
Slain Benghazi Officer's Mom: Obama, Clinton, Rice All Blamed the
Video As 'They Were Hugging Me'. May 10, 2013 ...
Benghazigate: a

MUST-SEE: Compiltion Of Obama Blaming Benghazi On Video ...
beforeitsnews.com/.../must-see-compiltion-of-obama-blaming-
benghazi-...‎

[Alias]

On 5/16/2013 4:13 PM, :ПеаБраин wrote:

>> > >MAY
>> > >14
>> > >How the White House Covered Up Benghazi

The day after the attack, Obama called it an act of terror. Oops. It
must be depressing for you to not have anything solid to discredit
Obama, being as you hate the idea of a black man in the White House
(your *only* reason for doing this). You don't have the votes so you
have to stoop to lies and making up scandals. I'm quite thankful I am
not you.

--
Alias

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

> Alias- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Where? On the golf course?? Then why was Susan Rice all over the TV a
week later still claiming the attack was the result of a YouTube
video?

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/ambassador-susan-rice-libya-attack-not-premeditated/

Ambassador Susan Rice: Libya Attack Not Premeditated

Sep 16, 2012 10:11am U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice
said the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi last week was
not premeditated, directly contradicting top Libyan officials who say
the attack was planned in advance.

“Our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at
present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous –
not a premeditated – response to what had transpired in Cairo,” Rice
told me this morning on “This Week.”

“In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent
protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video
that was disseminated,” Rice said, referring to protests in Egypt
Tuesday over a film that depicts the Prophet Muhammad as a fraud.
Protesters in Cairo breached the walls of the U.S. Embassy, tearing
apart an American flag.

[Alias]

On 5/16/2013 5:30 PM, Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E
wrote:

>> >The day after the attack, Obama called it an act of terror. Oops.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Alias- Hide quoted text -
>> >
>> >- Show quoted text -
> Where? On the golf course??

Try the Rose Garden where there is no golf course.

> Then why was Susan Rice all over the TV a
> week later still claiming the attack was the result of a YouTube
> video?

She said "the information we have now ..."

It's so amusing to see you right wing idiots grasping at straws,
desperate to discredit Obama but unwilling to come up with a jobs bill
or fix the dying infrastructure or *anything* positive for the USA.

--
Alias

[mg]

Let's see. You have 6 paragraphs there averaging about 6 lines per
paragraph and about 14 words per line. All of that is full of nothing
but yada, yada, yada.

Where's the evidence that the White House did anything wrong?

[MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE]

mg
> gapa.wrote:

>> MAY
>> 14
>> How the White House Covered Up Benghazi

...

>
> Where's the evidence that the White House did anything wrong?

The Executive Office and NSC knew full well in advance that Benghazi
was going to happen, they cultivated it, let it happen because
they erroneously believed they could 'manage' the situation,
that it could be spun for political benefit, do do so,
to gamble the lives of your own personnel for
temporary political gain is a breach of the
Trust of those whose job it is to protect us
is NOT JUST Mistaken, but EVIL.


To factually,
watch for seven hours
as your people are murdered
is NOT JUST Mistaken but EVIL.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/the_malignant_narcissist_and_the_ben
ghazi_snuff_film.html
The Malignant Narcissist and the Benghazi 'Snuff Film'

Credible sources indicate that the president of the United States
watched in real time what might well be called the Benghazi snuff film



Good Men who continue to remain SILENT and continue to choose to do
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in the face of this make of themselves
Material Accomplices to OBAMA's Intrinsic Evil. PERIOD.



DEMAND TRUTH.
DESERVE PEACE.
DESERVE FREEDOM.
DEMAND COMPETENCE.
DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY.
DEFEAT LIB STRATEGIC INSANITY. IMPEACH OBAMA. PERIOD.


LIBs. What PRICE their Vision?
---
LIB's plead for a Morality which holds COMPROMISE as it's standard of
Value,
making it possible to judge Virtue on the basis of the number of Values
which one is willing to Betray.

BENGHAZI: DUE TO A VIDEO.
BOSTON BOMBING: TAX DAY.
BOSTON BOMBING (REVISION): Domestic Terror.
BOSTON BOMBING (REVISION): Lone Wolf Domestic Terror
BOSTON BOMBING (REVISION): Lone Wolf Domestic Terror with Int'l Source

ALL NONSENSE: BOSTON BOMBING: AlQaeda, Day 1.


TRUTH. LEADERSHIP. SOLUTIONS? OBAMA? NON-SEQUITUR.
No one REALLY Appreciates what it must FEEL LIKE to be the JOKER.

http://www.wildsoundmovies.com/images/the_joker_burning_money.jpg
http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/181779.png
http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/160688.jpg

[MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE]

mg
> gapa.wrote:

>> MAY
>> 14
>> How the White House Covered Up Benghazi

...

>
> Where's the evidence that the White House did anything wrong?

[MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE]

mg
> gapa.wrote:

>> MAY
>> 14
>> How the White House Covered Up Benghazi

...

>
> Where's the evidence that the White House did anything wrong?

[mg]

On May 16, 10:17 am, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE

<ExPresid...@au.revoir.gov> wrote:
> mg
>
> > gapa.wrote:
> >> MAY
> >> 14
> >> How the White House Covered Up Benghazi
> ...
>
> > Where's the evidence that the White House did anything wrong?
>
> The Executive Office and NSC knew full well in advance that Benghazi
> was going to happen, they cultivated it, let it happen because
> they erroneously believed they could 'manage' the situation,
> that it could be spun for political benefit, do do so,
> to gamble the lives of your own personnel for
> temporary political gain is a breach of the
> Trust of those whose job it is to protect us
> is NOT JUST Mistaken, but EVIL.
>
> To factually,
> watch for seven hours
> as your people are murdered
> is NOT JUST Mistaken but EVIL.
>

> http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/the_malignant_narcissist_and_t...

Well, you certainly have sprinkled a lot of irrelevant, cut-and-paste
horseshit in your post, which is even longer than the original post,
but where's the evidence of a cover up?

Exactly what is the White House covering up and exactly what have they
done to cover it up?

[ПеаБраин]

On May 16, 10:53 am, AliASS <aka@masked&anonymous.com.invalid> wrote:
> On 5/16/2013 4:13 PM, :ПеаБраин wrote:
>
> >> > >MAY
> >> > >14
> >> > >How the White House Covered Up Benghazi
>
> The day after the attack, Obama called it an act of terror. Oops.

> AliASS

"Obama’s claim he called Benghazi an ‘act of terrorism’"
Washington Post 06:00 AM ET, 05/14/2013 (In which the ueber-liberal
WaPo awarded Obama 4 pinnochios for his spin at deception)


“The day after it happened, I acknowledged that this was an act of
terrorism.”
— President Obama, remarks at a news conference, May 13, 2013


...In fact, as far as we can tell from combing through databases,
Monday was the first time the president himself referred to Benghazi
as an “act of terrorism.”....."

... President Obama said that he immediately told the American people
that the killing of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans in
Libya “was an act of terror.” But now he says he called it “an act of
terrorism.”

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,
alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand
for.”
— Obama, Rose Garden, Sept. 12


Whatever the reason, when given repeated opportunities to forthrightly
declare this was an “act of terrorism,” the president ducked the
question.
For instance, on Sept. 12, immediately after the Rose Garden statement
the day after the attack, Obama sat down with Steve Kroft of 60
Minutes and acknowledged he purposely avoided the using the word
“terrorism:”
KROFT: “Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid
the use of the word ‘terrorism’ in connection with the Libya attack.”
OBAMA: “Right.”
KROFT: “Do you believe that this was a terrorist attack?”
OBAMA: “Well, it’s too early to know exactly how this came about, what
group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans.

...In fact, as far as we can tell from combing through databases,
Monday was the first time the president himself referred to Benghazi
as an “act of terrorism.”....."

[MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE]

mg

> Exactly what is the White House covering up
> and exactly what have they done to cover it up?

1) That they had foreknowledge of the coming demonstration
2) That they intended to cultivate and manage it for political purposes
3) That they lied about the facts when it got out of their control and did
nothing about it as they watched their own people die which is an
egregious breach of trust between those brave enough to defend us
from our Adversaries with the Statist Securocrats back home who purport
to be defending our interests behind a desk reading the Drudge Report.




http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/the_malignant_narcissist_and_the_ben
gh

azi_snuff_film.html
The Malignant Narcissist and the Benghazi 'Snuff Film'

Credible sources indicate that the president of the United States
watched in real time what might well be called the Benghazi snuff film

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jul/24/hurt-letter-christopher-
nolan-sean-penn-warner-bro/
HURT: An open letter to Christopher Nolan,
Sean Penn and Warner Brothers

It is all so perfectly fitting that in the wake of a murderous rampage in
which 70 people are shot �12 fatally, including a 6-year-old girl � and
countless families are sacked with unspeakable grief, you would take the
time to share with us your feelings.

Because, really, at this moment, all that matters to most of us is what a
bunch of smutty purveyors of violent fantasy, half-rate actors and an
industry of sick narcissism is feeling at this moment.
...

Your celebrations of diabolical mayhem and pornographic violence prey on
the fantasies of sick, fragile minds. You insulated them from the painful
reality of bloodshed. You have inspired mass murder. You are the Osama bin
Laden of this travesty.

...

One day, you will meet the original Joker, the inventor of all evil who is
diabolical and depraved so far beyond your furthest, sickest imaginations
and there, in his lair, you will spend the rest of eternity wishing you
had had a little decency back when you had the chance.



We all met the REAL JOKER in the Boston Bombings.
OBAMA and all the Securocrats proudly pronounced the cause: TAX DAY.


Such WOULD NOT be tolerated in a socity with a Long Memory.
The TRUTH is Treason in the Empire of LIES.
When the TRUTH become a Liability
ALL PEOPLE become the Enemy.

LIBs. What PRICE their Vision?
---

http://washingtonexaminer.com/photo/pid/2535859
http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/160688.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v620/ringo137/Barack_fawkes.jpg

What you mean WE paleface?

[Alias]

Nit picking dick head.

--
Alias

[Alias]

On 5/16/2013 6:52 PM, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:
> mg
>> Exactly what is the White House covering up
>> and exactly what have they done to cover it up?
>
>
> 1) That they had foreknowledge of the coming demonstration

BFD.

> 2) That they intended to cultivate and manage it for political purposes

Bullshit.

> 3) That they lied about the facts when it got out of their control and did
> nothing about it as they watched their own people die which is an
> egregious breach of trust between those brave enough to defend us
> from our Adversaries with the Statist Securocrats back home who purport
> to be defending our interests behind a desk reading the Drudge Report.

More bullshit.

--
Alias

[MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE]

Benghazi Attack: BECAUSE OF A VIDEO.
Boston Bombing: BECAUSE OF TAX DAY.


And we are supposed to enTRUST our security
to an administration whose expert analysis and opinion renders ^THAT^?


http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/163419.jpg

"it is wrong to believe that if security is embraced,
liberty is sacrificed."
Janet Napolitano'10



Such would NOT be Tolerated in a Society with a long memory.


LIBs. What PRICE their VISION.
---

DEMAND TRUTH.
DESERVE PEACE.
DESERVE FREEDOM.
DEMAND COMPETENCE.
DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY.
DEFEAT LIB STRATEGIC INSANITY. IMPEACH OBAMA. PERIOD.

Truth is TREASON in the EMPIRE OF LIES
because when the Truth becomes a Liability ALL PEOPLE become the Enemy.




http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/being-obama_591426.html
Being Obama

What makes President Obama's executive passivity so interesting is that it
seems to be a symptom not of policy uncertainty, but of personal
narcissism. The president is free to delegate the tasks of the president
because he's already done the important job of simply showing up.

...

President Obama never tires of inserting himself into measurement of the
world around him.
...

When people dont appreciate how important the job of being Barack Obama
is, our president can get a little testy. As time passes, you start
taking it for granted that a guy named Barack Hussein Obama is president
of the United States, he told a group of donors in March. But we should
never take it for granted. . . . I hope that all of you still feel that
sense of excitement and that sense of possibility. Last November he met
with Afghanistan's president, Hamid Karzai, who began his remarks by
thanking the president for setting the tone right for their talks.
Obama huffed, That was my goal. Every once in a while, I do things
right. ...


Bill Clinton's vanity was that he wished he could have been at the center
of a world historical event. Barack Obama's vanity is that he believes he
is a world historical event. And the greatness of his being dwarfs any
necessity to establish greatness through action. That's why, despite his
passivity as president, we're likely to see a much more vigorous Obama in
the coming months as he switches from governing to campaigning. However
ambivalent he may be about leading the country, arguing for the
indispensability of Barack Obama is the one project that has always
commanded his full attention.

[MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE]

Alias

> On 5/16/2013 6:52 PM, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:
>> mg
>>> Exactly what is the White House covering up
>>> and exactly what have they done to cover it up?
>>
>>
>> 1) That they had foreknowledge of the coming demonstration
>
> BFD.

Items in the PDB are not BFD.
But that's Right! OBAMA was skipping the PDB
preparing the way for his plausible deniability...



Such would NOT be tolerated in a society with a long memory.


THEN:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1462140/posts
Clinton Lawyers: Mohamed Atta Off-Limits

A year before the 9/11 attacks, Clinton administration lawyers told a
group of military intelligence officers that information they had
developed on 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta could not be shared with the
FBI, saying of Atta himself:
"You can't even touch him
- it doesn't matter what information you have."


NOW:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-is-obama-skipping-more-than-
half-
of-his-daily-intelligence-meetings/2012/09/10/6624afe8-fb49-11e1-b153-
218509a954e1_story.html
Why is Obama skipping more than
half of his daily intelligence meetings?



THEN:

"to leave now we would send a message to terrorists
and other potential adversaries around the world that
they can change our policies by killing our people.
It would be open season on Americans."
-- Bill Clinton '93
just before he pulled out of Somalia.


NOW:

To abandon this area now -- and to rely only on efforts against
alQaeda from a distance -- would significantly hamper our ability to
keep the pressure on al Qaeda, and create an UNACCEPTABLE RISK of
additional attacks on our homeland and our allies.
-- OBAMA'09 after doing PRECISELY THAT.

LIBs. What PRICE their Vision?
---

Watch as your World Ends, become Gaius Baltar
to Unstoppable Killing Machines who promised to murder you Last,
*OR* do something about it while you still can.


Good Men who choose to do Absolutely Nothing
make of themselves Material Accomplices to Intrinsic Evil.
of which the TRUELY EVIL are abetted by the Venal and the WEAK.

[Alias]

On 5/16/2013 7:04 PM, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:
> Benghazi Attack: BECAUSE OF A VIDEO.

That was one of the possibilities that was changed when it was found out
it wasn't the cause.

> Boston Bombing: BECAUSE OF TAX DAY.

Riiiiiiiiiiight. You're a desperate nit picking asshole, did you know that?

--
Alias

[Alias]

On 5/16/2013 7:09 PM, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:

The usual bullshit.


--
Alias

[MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE]

Alias

> On 5/16/2013 7:04 PM, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:
>> Benghazi Attack: BECAUSE OF A VIDEO.
>
> That was one of the possibilities that was changed when it was found out
> it wasn't the cause.
>
>> Boston Bombing: BECAUSE OF TAX DAY.
>
> Riiiiiiiiiiight.

Spook sponsored humor
is just-as-unfunny even
when it renders 'omage to a
moderately entertaining series.


OBAMA has disgraced his office and betrayed us ALL. Period.

To remain silent in the face of an Evil which has
no justification, nor does it seek any, is to
sanction is continued existance and to
become its Material Accomplice. PERIOD.

[Alias]

On 5/16/2013 7:28 PM, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:

His usual tin foil hat bullshit.


--
Alias

[maxw...@my-deja.com]

On May 16, 11:30 am, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey

> http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/09/ambassador-susan-rice-li...

>
> Ambassador Susan Rice: Libya Attack Not Premeditated
>
> Sep 16, 2012 10:11am U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice
> said the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi last week was
> not premeditated, directly contradicting top Libyan officials who say
> the attack was planned in advance.
>
> “Our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at
> present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous –
> not a premeditated – response to what had transpired in Cairo,” Rice
> told me this morning on “This Week.”
>
> “In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent
> protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video
> that was disseminated,” Rice said, referring to protests in Egypt
> Tuesday over a film that depicts the Prophet Muhammad as a fraud.
> Protesters in Cairo breached the walls of the U.S. Embassy, tearing
> apart an American flag.

This was from the CIA talking points, the state dept didn't
make up their own story. They have to be very careful
what gets reported to the media when it comes to
security matters. They don't want to say the wrong thing
and this is what the CIA gave them to say.
If there is a conspiracy then it is the CIA attempting to
influence the political landscape. And some people
have fallen for it.

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

> have fallen for it.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Oh, I see. So the CIA can't tell the POTUS about a terror attack
because he can't be trusted to keep his mouth shut. I'm convinced you
leftists would be so understanding if GW Bush was POTUS.

[MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE]

And Ft. Hood STILL isn't considered a Terrorist attack
even though the perp had continuing contact with a terror principal.


Wave after wave of Terror appearing over the horizon
continues to be met with unmitigated (t)error from the
executive branch which oddly matches their political agenda.


And such is not worthy of the Daily Polemic? hmm.

"Next year, you and I and everybody else will be freer
and have more space to say what we believe to be the truth"
-- CLINTON'08, w/emphasis on 'BELIEVE'...


"we are all going to have to rethink how we deal with the Internet"
-- Hillary'98


http://www.freeman.org/m_online/jun04/sagamori.htm
Staying Morally Superior to the Sharks.
...
Even more obscene is the celebration by the Democrats of the scandal
during a presidential campaign. They would gladly sacrifice the country
if only they could rule over its ruins. What makes it even worse is the
obvious futility of their efforts.
...
when Hillary moves into the White House, the immorality
of the United States will need a different scale for measurement,
a scale which will leave sharks BARELY VISIBLE even with a powerful
microscope.
...

LIBs. What PRICE their Vision?
---

A Citizen who Votes for OBAMA is like a Chicken voting for Col. Sanders.
http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/123755.jpg

[maxw...@my-deja.com]

On May 16, 2:12 pm, "Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E"

Nope. That is not what I said. Even you should see that
the CIA did nothing in Obama's favour by putting that story
out there. That was their plan and you it is clear
fell for it. There I spelled it out for you.

[Robert Westergrom,1900 Harvey rd.,Wilmington,D.E]

> fell for it. There I spelled it out for you.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

ssssssssssstttrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreettttttccccccccccccccccccccccccchhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !!!!!!!!

[joeturn]

On May 16, 5:45 pm, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE

[joeturn]

> > A Citizen who Votes for OBAMA is like a Chicken voting for Col. Sanders.http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/123755.jpg- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

http://www.wellaware1.com/bush.shtml

[Alias]

[MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE]

Spook denial notwithstanding.

BENGHAZI: Terrorist Attack, not results of a video
BOSTON: Terrorist Attack, active cell of 13, not lone wolves.
FtHOOD: Terrorist Attack, co-opted GI, not workplace violence.


By the time the spooks, Statist Securocrats, and SHAMELESS POLITICO THUGS
realize how effectively (and willfully) they've been tool'd by our
Adversaries they'll all be on their golden parachutes
while the rest of us to deal with their blowback.


Why wouldn't we enTrust such utter buffoonery
with every aspect of our rights, Security and our VERY LIVES?

[Alias]

[joeturn]

On May 17, 10:54 am, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE

http://www.wellaware1.com/benghazi.shtml

http://www.wellaware1.com/artwork/large/stalin.jpg