info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Alex Jones says Sandy Hook shooting "100% real"...
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Dusty Track
Aug 3, 2022, 10:13:10 PM8/3/22
to
From the horse's mouth under Oath...
Alex Jones admits Sandy Hook shooting 100% real, lawyers accidentally revealed his phone log
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usZGfCN9IeE
This is on a similar speculative level as those who say that the vaxx was deliberately made to cause a mass culling of the whole human population...despite the fact e.g. that the Israeli population was (at least ostensibly) mass and serially vaxxed.
Alex Jones admits Sandy Hook shooting 100% real, lawyers accidentally revealed his phone log
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usZGfCN9IeE
This is on a similar speculative level as those who say that the vaxx was deliberately made to cause a mass culling of the whole human population...despite the fact e.g. that the Israeli population was (at least ostensibly) mass and serially vaxxed.
Dusty Track
Aug 9, 2022, 2:28:07 AM8/9/22
to
Ron Unz's useful discussion of the issue.("After I gradually became aware of the conspiratorial reality behind much of modern American history, one particular figure earned a great deal of my respect, and I featured him in the dedication of my recent collection of articles on this topic: To the Memory of Michael Collins Piper, Who Pinned the Tail on the Donkey Almost Thirty Years Ago)...
https://www.unz.com/runz/alex-jones-cass-sunstein-and-cognitive-infiltration/
https://www.unz.com/runz/alex-jones-cass-sunstein-and-cognitive-infiltration/
Dusty Track
Aug 9, 2022, 2:39:42 AM8/9/22
to
Michael Collins Piper's book, False Flags...
https://www.unz.com/book/michael_collins_piper__false-flags/
https://www.unz.com/book/michael_collins_piper__false-flags/
Dusty Track
Aug 9, 2022, 4:45:38 AM8/9/22
to
This is Ron Unz's remarks dealing with the relevant substantive part of Michael Collins Piper's assertions:
The bulk of his text dealt with those major events of recent American history, but the last chapters focused on what he regarded as a new and particularly threatening conspiratorial technique, a very effective means of confusing and frustrating all investigatory efforts by citizen-activists.
The growth of the Internet had made it increasingly difficult to suppress the distribution of information, so he suspected that a different approach was being used:
"But the plan—as we shall see—was not just simply standing back and loudly and repeatedly denying the existence of conspiracies. Instead, the course of action was far more subtle—some might even say Talmudic (and, if truth be told, it was a stroke of genius).
The intriguers effectively determined that “if you can’t lick ‘em, join ‘em” (as the old saying goes).
That is, rather than working to REFUTE conspiracy theories, the solution would be to INFECT them and MISDIRECT them and add utter confusion to the mix.
The consequence would be that conspiracy theories would look so ridiculous that no broad swath of people in the general public might one day actually begin to have any belief in their credibility."
In Piper’s opinion, the Sandy Hook school shootings represented the first real-life test of this new strategy, which he believed had been masterminded by Cass Sunstein of the Obama Administration:
"The Sandy Hook affair was tailor-made for putting the Sunstein gang’s experiment in motion. It involved violence. It involved the explosive issue of gun control, inasmuch as the incident was said to have been a mass shooting. And it was another sensational school shooting—and one at a grade school, no less.
The dynamics were absolutely on target—no pun intended—for the Sunstein thesis to be put to the test.
And, quite predictably, the mass media—as a consequence of its typically reckless nature—played right into the scheme. The frenzied rush in the heat of the moment to get “the scoop” led to sloppy, reporting and presumably otherwise honest mistakes by journalists.
And naturally, a lot of these errors were quickly the subject of discussion among emailers and those participating on Internet discussion forums who were concerned about the obvious push for further gun control that was accompanying the media reportage relating to the events at Sandy Hook."
Piper argued that a small group of establishment operatives successfully manipulated the conspiracy community on the Internet, promoting ideas that soon captured the imagination of these activists, many of whom were excitable and overly gullible:
"One of the first and most outrageous of these Internet “revelations” that did so much to make sincere truth seekers look foolish was the oft-repeated theme that “Sandy Hook was a hoax” and that no children were even killed there. (Yes, that was a frequently repeated allegation.)
Even the introduction of the word “hoax” was carefully calculated and with the mass media reporting that “conspiracy theorists” were using that term to describe the tragedy, many in the general public began to doubt the sanity of a lot of good people who were rightfully raising questions about what happened at Sandy Hook and the way that it was being exploited…
This was their first big “test tube” case and it was proving to be a success, perhaps beyond even their wildest dreams."
Piper followed the events closely at the time, and he described how waves of Sandy Hook rumors and theories were deployed to swamp those websites following the story:
"The Crisis Management Conspirators mesmerized and manipulated American patriots and other skeptics via a non-stop wave of Sandy Hook “factoids” that quickly spread like wildfire across the Internet. And patriot websites by the hundreds—by the thousands—were picking them up and reporting them. These legends—spawned by the Crisis Management folks—became the staple daily diet of email addicts who were eagerly helping distribute the latest Sandy Hook “revelations”…
Precisely because so much disinformation was being repeated by well-meaning and entirely innocent folks, a lot of good patriots concluded that something had to be amiss with the “official” Sandy Hook story or otherwise—they said—so many good patriots on so many websites and elsewhere wouldn’t be raising these questions."
The bulk of his text dealt with those major events of recent American history, but the last chapters focused on what he regarded as a new and particularly threatening conspiratorial technique, a very effective means of confusing and frustrating all investigatory efforts by citizen-activists.
The growth of the Internet had made it increasingly difficult to suppress the distribution of information, so he suspected that a different approach was being used:
"But the plan—as we shall see—was not just simply standing back and loudly and repeatedly denying the existence of conspiracies. Instead, the course of action was far more subtle—some might even say Talmudic (and, if truth be told, it was a stroke of genius).
The intriguers effectively determined that “if you can’t lick ‘em, join ‘em” (as the old saying goes).
That is, rather than working to REFUTE conspiracy theories, the solution would be to INFECT them and MISDIRECT them and add utter confusion to the mix.
The consequence would be that conspiracy theories would look so ridiculous that no broad swath of people in the general public might one day actually begin to have any belief in their credibility."
In Piper’s opinion, the Sandy Hook school shootings represented the first real-life test of this new strategy, which he believed had been masterminded by Cass Sunstein of the Obama Administration:
"The Sandy Hook affair was tailor-made for putting the Sunstein gang’s experiment in motion. It involved violence. It involved the explosive issue of gun control, inasmuch as the incident was said to have been a mass shooting. And it was another sensational school shooting—and one at a grade school, no less.
The dynamics were absolutely on target—no pun intended—for the Sunstein thesis to be put to the test.
And, quite predictably, the mass media—as a consequence of its typically reckless nature—played right into the scheme. The frenzied rush in the heat of the moment to get “the scoop” led to sloppy, reporting and presumably otherwise honest mistakes by journalists.
And naturally, a lot of these errors were quickly the subject of discussion among emailers and those participating on Internet discussion forums who were concerned about the obvious push for further gun control that was accompanying the media reportage relating to the events at Sandy Hook."
Piper argued that a small group of establishment operatives successfully manipulated the conspiracy community on the Internet, promoting ideas that soon captured the imagination of these activists, many of whom were excitable and overly gullible:
"One of the first and most outrageous of these Internet “revelations” that did so much to make sincere truth seekers look foolish was the oft-repeated theme that “Sandy Hook was a hoax” and that no children were even killed there. (Yes, that was a frequently repeated allegation.)
Even the introduction of the word “hoax” was carefully calculated and with the mass media reporting that “conspiracy theorists” were using that term to describe the tragedy, many in the general public began to doubt the sanity of a lot of good people who were rightfully raising questions about what happened at Sandy Hook and the way that it was being exploited…
This was their first big “test tube” case and it was proving to be a success, perhaps beyond even their wildest dreams."
Piper followed the events closely at the time, and he described how waves of Sandy Hook rumors and theories were deployed to swamp those websites following the story:
"The Crisis Management Conspirators mesmerized and manipulated American patriots and other skeptics via a non-stop wave of Sandy Hook “factoids” that quickly spread like wildfire across the Internet. And patriot websites by the hundreds—by the thousands—were picking them up and reporting them. These legends—spawned by the Crisis Management folks—became the staple daily diet of email addicts who were eagerly helping distribute the latest Sandy Hook “revelations”…
Precisely because so much disinformation was being repeated by well-meaning and entirely innocent folks, a lot of good patriots concluded that something had to be amiss with the “official” Sandy Hook story or otherwise—they said—so many good patriots on so many websites and elsewhere wouldn’t be raising these questions."
0 new messages