Diamond's particular views, detailed in his posts over
the years, are at times repugnant to proletarian morality.
But democratic rights are indivisible. Remember Dreyfus?
Mr. Diamond is subject to proceedings which are neither
fish nor foul, an inquisitorial process in which he lacks even
the nominal protections afforded to criminal defendants in
the US system of class justice.
In turning against one of its own, that system exhibits
the viciously uncontrolled character of the State Bar
system itself, accorded a semijudicial stature without
being subject to proper review by the capitalists' State.
Obscenely, this disciplinary action is ostensibly taken
in the name of lower-income immigrant workers
defrauded by some of Diamond's business associates.
Every arcane procedural loophole the Lawyers' Trust
employs against Mr. Diamond oozes its basic hostility
to anything approaching the actual merits of a case:
Imagine the situation of immigrant workers or business
owners, whose knowledge of English is limited, trying
to navigate the system controlled by that Trust!
Mr. Diamond's personal views sometimes oppose
the interests of the international working class.
Those arrayed against him here are implacable enemies
of Justice -- even that shade of Justice which avowedly
serves the interests of the bourgeoisie.
Mr. Diamond's blog, "kanBARoo court: Critique of
the State Bar Establishment; how legal ineptitude
generates oppression" is at:
http://kanbaroo.blogspot.com/
srd
You absolutely have my permission to repost my remarks, either
in full or in excerpt, on your blog or anywhere else.
> You absolutely have my permission to repost my remarks, either
> in full or in excerpt, on your blog or anywhere else.
srd