Susspected Pedophile Groomer Candace Owens Hosts A Pedophile On Her Show

[Ubiquitious Ron]

https://www.reddit.com/r/berkeley/comments/12tp1mn/tinder_for_friends_pedophi
le_ends_up_on_candace/

[Candace Owens]

I flew to Bucharest, Romania, to interview Andrew Tate last week. There have
been over 3 million views of our three-hour interview. That’s incredible, and
the majority of responses have been positive, with people saying they really
needed to hear this conversation. Some people, however, asked why I
interviewed Andrew Tate, who is not a conservative nor a Christian. So why
Tate?

That has to be the most ridiculous question ever asked. I don’t limit my
interactions to only conservatives or only Christians. The job of
conservative and Christian podcasters is not to host only people who agree
with them. People who sit across from these interviewers obviously will not
be the exact same person. If they were, no one would have a podcast. I’ve had
plenty of people on my show with whom I have fundamental disagreements. I had
the founder of Black Lives Matter New York join me, and we had _many_
disagreements. The goal is — and should be — to discuss both different and
similar ideas, to foster a conversation, especially with someone as
interesting as Andrew Tate.

Far be it from me to suggest that conservatives in America have given a
platform to Tate. He’s done that all on his own. And that’s fascinating. Tens
of millions of young men around the world listen to Tate every single day. In
fact, so many people listen to him that within 24 hours, we broke a viewer
record: More than one million people watched in just a 24-hour span and the
now-3 million-view number continues to climb. So, he’s a newsworthy person,
and his platform is going to exist with or without conservatives in America
speaking with him.

When I started my journey into conservatism, I had to begin _somewhere_ --
and it wasn’t with the people I listen to today. At that time, all I knew was
that something was wrong with leftist principles, that perhaps leftist
principles were holding black Americans back. That was my focus then, before
I understood the problem was much bigger. Now I have some fundamental
differences with the people I started out listening to, but the people I
listen to today would have never brought me to the conservative side when I
was first becoming curious.

Becoming a conservative was a process for me, so I understand that it is
often a process for others. I do not come from a background of conservatism.
My grandfather was a steadfast Christian, and he planted those seeds in me,
which I think is why I have bloomed into the person I am today. But, I took
quite a liberal route to conservatism — so much so, that I speak to people
about the ills of liberalism from the position of someone who has lived that
way. When I come from that perspective, I am better able to connect with them
and it’s easier for them to identify with me. The reason I am a conservative
today is definitely not because I was listening to squeaky clean
conservatives who had a podcast. Those types of shows didn’t resonate with me
— because that’s just not how that works. That is not how spiritual
maturation works. It is a process.

I think everybody vibrates at different frequencies throughout the seasons of
their life. When I was younger, I listened to hip hop music with terrible
language that had really dark themes. At that time of my life, I could relate
to it. As I mentioned in my interview with Tate, I specifically connected
with Jay-Z’s music because he came from nothing and went on to make something
of himself. It was a frequency, if you will, that I could respond and relate
to. I could think, “Ok, I can actually make something of myself.” People who
do not come from privileged backgrounds like to have someone to look up to
because it makes that process of “making something of yourself” more
attainable. That’s the truth. As I have matured, I’ve stopped listening to
that music. But that doesn’t mean I can’t relate to the _people_ who still
listen to that music. I don’t leave them behind while saying, “Oh well, I
don’t understand how you listen to this!” Because I do very much understand
how they listen to it. I understand for a lot of people, that can sound like
the only hope they have in their life. Again, spiritual development is a
process.

I have been given a platform that allows me to initiate that same process of
maturation with other people. I can sound quite puritanical when I talk to
young women, but I don’t speak to them with snobbery. I don’t look down my
nose and say, “How could you follow this person? How could you listen to that
person?” Our job should not be to judge the tens of millions of young men who
listen to Tate. First, that won’t work. And second, you can’t hate someone
out of existence. Our job is, instead, to understand _why_. The only way to
do that is to ask meaningful questions. What is it these men are responding
to? Why are people following him?

Because I acted as a journalist, asking questions I was curious about, I was
able to understand. Over the last ten or so years, we have been existing
under a rabid matriarchy where women think that we should be the ones to
define what is and is not masculine and what a man should be, and if we
shriek loud enough about it, men will tuck their tail between their legs and
yield to our every order; that will allow our society to function. In
actuality, it’s far from that. This toxic matriarchy we are existing in is
actually a bit like hell on earth right now.

Men have been told they are nothing. Men are routinely having this narrative
reinforced to them by mainstream media and culture. Women rap about how
terrible men are, make a mockery of relationships, talk about feminism — a
toxic brand of feminism — and make men feel terrible. Then Tate came along,
stood up for men, and said men _can_ work out, they _can_ start a business,
they _can_ be strong. He told men they don’t need to listen to those kinds of
messages from those kinds of women. And the men responded.

To those who think they can tell me who I can sit down with and speak to, I
laugh. I am the same woman who said I would like to sit down with Vladimir
Putin. I stand by that statement. I would still like to sit down with him
because I’m curious and I don’t accept mainstream media. It would do us all
good to remember the media gives us the narrative they want us to believe. I
would sit down with a lot of people if they were alive today, including the
horrible and the backwards. I’m a curious person, and I will remain curious.

I’m proud of the sit down I had with Andrew Tate. And there will be more to
come.