Re: Pay per Mile: States Move Toward User-Based Road Tax

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 1/20/23 9:05 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> Hybrid drivers pay twice
>
> With each gallon of gas pumped in the United States since 1932, drivers
> have been paying taxes. The revenue is used for road repairs and public
> transportation such as train and bus systems.
>
> Currently, the Fed takes 18.4 cents per gallon for gas or 24.4 cents
> per gallon for diesel. State gas taxes range from a national high of 61
> cents for gas in Pennsylvania, to a low of 8.95 cents in Alaska.
>
> But environmentally motivated improvements in fuel efficiency and the
> move to electric vehicles (EVs) translate to less gas sold, resulting
> less tax revenue collected.
>
> State and federal governments are looking for a new way to fund
> transportation. Through numerous studies by transportation
> organizations, they have landed on mileage-based user fees (MBUF);
> vehicle miles traveled fees (VMT); road user charges (RUCs), or highway
> use fees (HUF). The acronyms all mean the same thing: Drivers pay a tax
> for each mile traveled.
>
> “All vehicles are going farther on less gas, and that is great for our
> wallets, especially with the gas prices going up. But it’s not so good
> when our transportation system is dependent on that fuel tax,” Trish
> Hendren, executive director of the Eastern Transportation Coalition,
> told The Epoch Times. “The link between usage and payment is broken.”
>
> The coalition describes itself as a partnership of 17 states and
> Washington, D.C., focused on connecting public agencies across modes of
> travel to increase safety and efficiency. Member states in the
> coalition include Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
> Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North
> Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, and Virginia.
>
> But the move to user-based fees is a nationwide effort being discussed
> in every state. Oregon, Utah, and Virginia have already implemented
> pilot programs.
>
> At least 31 states have laws requiring a special registration fee for
> plug-in electric vehicles. Of those, 18 states also assess a fee on
> plug-in hybrid vehicles, according to the National Conference of State
> Legislatures.
>
> Fee for EV and Gas Power
> Virginia implemented a new highway use fee for electric and high-
> efficiency gas vehicles in 2020, in addition to its existing vehicle
> license registration. The HUF is around $20 and is calculated based, in
> part, on a vehicle’s fuel efficiency.
>
> In 2022, the state started offering Virginia’s Mileage Choice Program,
> a pilot program giving drivers paying the HUF the option to pay on a
> per-mile basis. They save money if they drive less than 11,600 miles,
> the average driven per year by all Virginians. Miles are recorded by a
> device installed on a person’s car and connected to a smartphone.
> Programs in Oregon and Utah are similar.
>
> “The longer-term vision for a distance-based fee is it will replace the
> fuel tax,” Hendren said. But for now, those who drive high-efficiency
> gas vehicles often pay twice: both at the gas pump and with the HUF. In
> Virginia, drivers with fuel-efficient vehicles getting 25 miles per
> gallon or greater must pay the HUF.
>
> In Utah, all plug-in hybrid and gas hybrid vehicles must pay the Road
> Usage Charge, ranging from $21.75–$56.50. EV owners who don’t buy gas
> pay $130.25 a year.
>
> In Oregon, the vehicle registration fee is based on fuel efficiency.
> The better the mileage (the less gas used), the higher the cost of
> registration. But those with high-efficiency vehicles can enroll in
> OreGO and get a registration discount. OreGO participants pay 1.9 cents
> for each mile driven, and the money goes to the state highway fund. A
> device on the vehicle tracks miles driven, and drivers of fuel-powered
> vehicles can receive a credit for fuel tax and remote emissions
> testing, the OreGO website says.
>
> “This is a very challenging topic to talk about because nobody likes
> talking about paying for transportation,” Hendren said. “We all like
> the transportation that we use but paying for it is a hard
> conversation.”
>
> Public Resistance
> Studies recognize that drivers are concerned about privacy and a new
> tax, and offer analysis on what opposition a mileage fee would face.
>
> “Consumer perception and messaging surrounding what many vehicle owners
> may see as a new ‘fee’ must also be studied before any largescale
> rollout of an MBUF program,” a 2019 study by the Mobility 21 U.S. DOT
> University National Transportation Center said. The study noted that
> there are privacy considerations, and said it was an unsolved issue.
> “In addition to the intricacies of program design, several
> technological challenges also exist. For example, DOT’s must collect
> mileage data from each vehicle, for each type of road that vehicle
> travels on, but would still require to do so in a manner that protects
> the privacy of drivers.”
>
> Some studies attempted to minimize the privacy concern by showing other
> ways people are already being tracked.
>
> “Even if you were tracking with GPS, my phone and other apps do that as
> well. I use E-Z Pass on toll roads and that tracks me,” a New Jersey
> focus group participant was quoted in a November 2022 report of the
> Georgia Joint Study Committee of Electrification on Transportation.
>
> The number of people concerned about privacy dropped dramatically after
> participating in a pilot mileage program in Pennsylvania, Delaware,
> North Carolina, and New Jersey, a study of the Eastern Transportation
> Coalition found, Hendren said.
>
> Developers expect a third party, not the government, will keep track of
> where drivers go, and how much they owe, and some studies have
> indicated that because a third party is doing the tracking, the data is
> safe from government eyes. The data would go to a government contractor
> that would deduct the amount owed from a user’s credit card and pay it
> to the states where the vehicle had been.
>
> Federal Directive to Increase Revenue
> The 18.4 cent-per-gallon federal gas tax has not increased since 1993.
> Because of inflation, the revenue has about one-third less purchasing
> power than it did when the tax was last raised, according to a January
> 2022 report from the federal Government Accountability Office.
>
> In that report, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates the
> increasing gap between projected fuel tax revenues and federal highway
> spending will require $191 billion in additional funding to maintain
> current spending levels, plus inflation from fiscal years 2022 through
> 2031.
>
> In November 2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act allowed
> for the transfer of $118 billion in general revenue to the Highway
> Trust Fund, which will cover the estimated revenue shortfalls through
> at least 2026. While this funding will cover a portion of the estimated
> shortfall in the Highway Trust Fund, this transfer represents a one-
> time infusion of funding and is not a sustainable long-term source of
> revenues, the CBO report said.
>
> The CBO has been telling Congress since 2007 that it must pass a
> sustainable funding solution for maintaining the nation’s highways.
>
> In 2015, the U.S. Department of Transportation established the Surface
> Transportation System Funding Alternatives program to provide grants to
> states to explore the feasibility of user-based alternative funding
> mechanisms. That is what funded numerous studies across the country.
>
> “The Federal Highway Administration is working diligently in response
> to Congress’s directive that we implement programs to better understand
> the full range of factors involved in implementing a mileage-based user
> fee, including public acceptance and administrative feasibility,” a
> spokesperson for the Federal Highway Administration told The Epoch
> Times.
>
> --
> Let's go Brandon!
>
User Based road tax is already in progress as per the weight tax on
TRUCKS and Trailers and the higher cost per axle to use the Toll Roads.

And the more gas you use or Electric to recharge the more gas tax or
utility tax you pay so a car that gets lousy mileage (more rubber on the
roads or bigger engine) costs more to operate as you pay the tax on the
items to keep your vehicle driving another mile, and the more miles you
drive the more you pay in taxes.

So what they want is DOUBLE TAXATION to keep you poor and them wealthy
as they steal and barter your tax dollars to benefit themselves.

You know like Joe Biden did when he threatened to withhold a $Billion
tax dollars just to get a prosecutor fired because he was investigating
the Corruption that Hunter Biden and now we know also Joe (The BIG GUY)
Biden were skimming from.

They pass a thousand times more tax laws than they need to collect the
revenue to run the NATION... and they do that to fund their corruption.-




-Reality Matters-




https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2V
---------------------------------------

Raise taxes and it will STAGNATE THE ECONOMY and the realized "REVENUE"
will decrease as the economy falls into Depression.

If less money is being spent or invested, there is less income from
economic activity that can be taxed.

The secret sauce isn't in higher taxes, it's in increased economic
activity. And to achieve more economic activity, the government has to
be less greedy. And quit stealing from the Private Sector Economy.

Raising taxes is NOT a solution for failing GDP growth... economic
activity creates added "REVENUE" raising taxes created less GDP GROWTH
which results in less actual REVENUE for the U.S. Treasury.

Taxes are a way to collect the Revenue NOT create it.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

Biden admitted to engaging in extortion/bribery to get a foreign
official who was investigating fraud... fired. That was illegal due to
the fact that Biden's son was in league with the company being investigated.
*It's called a cover-up*

https://rumble.com/vcwdv5-joe-biden-admits-to-getting-ukrainian-prosecutor-who-investigated-son-fired.html

-Reality Matters-




https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2V
---------------------------------------

Raise taxes and it will STAGNATE THE ECONOMY and the realized "REVENUE"
will decrease as the economy falls into Depression.

If less money is being spent or invested, there is less income from
economic activity that can be taxed.

The secret sauce isn't in higher taxes, it's in increased economic
activity. And to achieve more economic activity, the government has to
be less greedy. And quit stealing from the Private Sector Economy.

Raising taxes is NOT a solution for failing GDP growth... economic
activity creates added "REVENUE" raising taxes created less GDP GROWTH
which results in less actual REVENUE for the U.S. Treasury.

Taxes are a way to collect the Revenue NOT create it.

--
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-That's Karma-

*IF YOU'RE READING THIS YOU ARE A SURVIVOR*
*The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is we talk about it, we hate
censorship. Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them
prove it with actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't
find the duplicitous lies in what the Marxist-Democrats told you then
you didn't dig deep enough. The *Gruber* *Doctrine* is the
Marxist-Democrat plan that says it's "to the Democrats advantage to have
a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".
https://rumble.com/vkt8ld-call-it-the-stupidity-of-the-american-voter-or-whatever.-how-libs-exploit-t.html

*The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB* is
191 - The governments decision to censor one of us is a concern for all
of us. -BMUS-