Re: Kansas GOP Leadership = White Men Only?

[Mitchell Holman]

"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
news:u55i3c$22u27$1...@dont-email.me:

>
>
> "Mitchell Holman" <noe...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:XnsB01485990A981...@69.80.101.53...
>> "Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>> news:u55a8k$21ug3$1...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Baxter" <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>> news:u50dor$10jvh$8...@dont-email.me...
>>>> deplorable <e...@good.org> wrote in
>>>> news:u50b72$lg7$5...@toxic.dizum.net:
>>>>
>>>>> On 28 May 2023, Mattb <trdel...@gmail.com> posted some
>>>>> news:fp477i5bnqg2g58jm...@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 28 May 2023 07:14:08 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>>>>><klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 28 May 2023 06:52:00 -0700, Siri Cruise
>>>>>>><chine...@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Matt wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 May 2023 23:19:47 -0700, Siri Cruise
>>>>>>>>> <chine...@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 May 2023 16:03:40 -0700, Siri Cruise
>>>>>>>>>>> <chine...@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you have only 1 polling place in a district with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20,000 voters it's a no-brainer there will be long
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines/waits.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you can't explain that it's done this way on purpose,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So in hick states government officers are just too
>>>>>>>>>>>> incredibly stupid to count the number of voters in precinct
>>>>>>>>>>>> and organise precinct polling stations accordingly?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you can't explain that it's done this way on purpose,
>>>>>>>>>>> can you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you're going with you hicks elect idiots.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Define 'Hicks'?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The image in your mirror.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>She means "The Deplorables."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Working class people, not members of the freeloader class? I'm
>>>>>> proud to be one of those and not a freeloader. I'm sure many of
>>>>>> us can relate to this feeling of being proud to be working class
>>>>>> and not of the freeloader class.
>>>>>
>>>>> I sleep very well after a day of hard work, knowing that I
>>>>> actually accomplished something worth while.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Conservaturd freeloaders are the ones yelling the loudest about
>>>> government benefits and spending.
>>>
>>> Super, then we can expect your full support to restrict and limit
>>> government benefits and spending?
>>
>>
>> Starting with veterans?
>>
>> Veterans sound alarm on McCarthy budget cuts
>> 04/27/23
>>
>> https://thehill.com/policy/defense/3976425-veterans-sound-alarm-on-
>>mccarthy-budget-cuts/
>>
>
> Except they worked for and earned those benefits.
>


Benefits the Republicans want to cut.

Do you support that?

[Scout]

"Mitchell Holman" <noe...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:XnsB014D87D979F5...@69.80.102.58...

As long as it applies to those who enlist after the changes are made. I will
simply note the rest of us have a signed contract.. and legally we could go
to court for a class action suit for breach of contract if our retirement
benefits are reduced.

Now, if somewhere along the line they decided to increase those benefits,
and then later reduced them back down.. well they have the power to do so
unless otherwise stipulated in the contract they made with the service
members.

[Lou Bricano]

On 5/31/2023 7:19 AM, scooter lied:

>
>
> "Mitchell Holman" <noe...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:XnsB014D87D979F5...@69.80.102.58...

>> scooter lied:

>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Mitchell Holman" <noe...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>> news:XnsB01485990A981...@69.80.101.53...

>>>> scooter lied:

It doesn't, scooter. It applies to veterans *now*.

[Siri Cruise]

Scout wrote:
> As long as it applies to those who enlist after the changes are
> made. I will simply note the rest of us have a signed contract..
> and legally we could go to court for a class action suit for
> breach of contract if our retirement benefits are reduced.

Quote where the contract makes promises that don't depend on
ongoing legislation.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.O / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[Scout]

"Siri Cruise" <chine...@www.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:u57ssb$2etfr$1...@dont-email.me...

> Scout wrote:
>> As long as it applies to those who enlist after the changes are made. I
>> will simply note the rest of us have a signed contract.. and legally we
>> could go to court for a class action suit for breach of contract if our
>> retirement benefits are reduced.
>
> Quote where the contract makes promises that don't depend on ongoing
> legislation.

When it sets forth that the benefits will exist and the date that the
contract was executed.

Just because you change the conditions for those who came later does NOT
absolve you of the conditions that existed at the time the contract took
place.

Hence, vets could sue the federal government for denial of benefits that
existed and were promised at the time the contract took force.

That would be basic contract law 101.

The terms and conditions that existed when the contract was enacted are what
both parties are obligated two. Unless by mutual consent they agree to a
change in the terms of the contract.

Vets served and were promised specific benefits. The government is
contractually, and thus legally obligated to provide them.