info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
The AR-15 Platform - Every American Citizen Should Own At Least Two
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 31, 2023, 9:05:11 AM5/31/23
to
The Constitutionally protected AR-15, also known as "America's Rifle,"
should be in the homes of every American citizen that's not a felon or
a dwarf.
https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/content/10-reasons-to-own-an-ar-15/
That couldn’t be further from the truth. Fact is, the AR-15-type rifle
is the most popular rifle in America for many reasons. Here are my Top
10 reasons to own an AR-15, in no particular order:
Self-Defense
Gun-banners would have you believe the AR-15 isn’t useful for home
defense, but they couldn’t be more wrong. NRA commentator and former
Navy SEAL Dom Raso, who now trains individuals in self-defense, said
it best: “For the vast majority of the people I work with, there is no
better firearm to defend their homes against realistic threats than an
AR-15 semi-automatic. It’s easy to learn and easy to use. It’s
accurate. It’s reliable.”
Fun/Recreation
If you can find a rifle out there that’s more fun than the AR-15 to
take to the range and punch some holes in paper, I’m not sure what it
would be. From short-range plinking to longer-range precision
shooting, the gun is easy to shoot—and easy to hit targets with. And,
as you know, nothing’s more fun than hitting what you shoot at.
Teaching/Learning
With simple operation and very low recoil, there’s no better rifle to
teach youngsters the skill of accurate rifle shooting. The fact that
shooting this rifle is easy and tons of fun also makes it great for
starting out new shooters, regardless of age. I’ve yet to take a
beginner—young or old—out to shoot an AR-15 without them getting a
huge smile on their face after the first magazine.
Hunting
The AR-15 and its big brother, the AR-10, are excellent hunting
rifles. AR-15s in 5.56/.223 are perfect for varmints and predator
hunting, and with the proper ammunition can make a great deer rifle.
Of course, the AR-15 is also chambered in a number of other more
powerful cartridges for big game, and the .308-chambered AR-10 is a
deer hunting favorite for many. Don’t buy the gun-banner lie that the
AR-15 can’t be a good hunting rifle.
Tinkering
If you like to tinker, the AR-15 is the rifle for you. Aftermarket
parts and upgrades are readily available from hundreds of sources, and
the gun’s easily understandable operation system makes it simple to
work on. If you can’t build one of these rifles on your kitchen table
with just a few specialized tools (legally, of course), you probably
skipped shop class in high school. Installing new stocks, triggers,
hand guards, pistol grips and other parts is also a breeze.
Farm/Ranch Use
The AR-15 is an excellent all-around rifle for farmers and ranchers to
carry in their trucks for predator control or other utilitarian uses.
Excellent accuracy combined with good magazine capacity is enough to
put the hurt on a pack of coyotes preying on calves or lambs—or on
wild hogs tearing up your alfalfa or wheat field. An AR-15 is also
handy for farmers and ranchers to have on hand in remote areas should
they run into those who would do ill to them.Fact is, the AR-15-type
rifle is the most popular rifle in America for many reasons.
Competitive Shooting
The AR-15 platform is excellent for a variety of competitive shooting
sports. As a 3-gun competitor, I see hundreds of people shoot AR-15s
safely and accurately on a regular basis. Banning ownership of
AR-15-type rifles for law-abiding Americans would be devastating to
3-gun—the fastest growing shooting sport in the country right now.
Disaster Preparedness
I’m not someone who believes in an impending doomsday scenario where
we will all find ourselves in a critical survival situation sometime
soon. But I’m also not one who thinks that couldn’t happen. I don’t
see how any survival situation wouldn’t be made better by having an
AR-15 or two on hand. In fact, the AR-15 might just be the perfect
SHTF firearm.
Bringing Women Into Shooting
Women are currently the fastest-growing demographic in the shooting
sports, and the AR-15 is doubtless one of the reasons why. Women love
the “cool factor” of the AR just as much as men do. And those with
zero shooting experience—who might harbor some fear of rifle shooting
because of a rifle’s perceived “kick”—quickly learn that the
soft-recoiling AR-15 is not only a pleasure to shoot, but fun to
customize just the way they want it.
America’s Rifle
As Dom Raso said in his recent video: “I guarantee you, if the
Founding Fathers would have known this gun was going to be invented,
they wouldn’t have rewritten the Second Amendment, they would have
fortified it in stone. Because they knew the only way for us to stay
free is by having whatever guns the bad guys have. This firearm gives
average people the advantage they so desperately need and deserve to
protect their life, liberty and happiness.”
Owning an AR-15 is as uniquely American as baseball, apple pie and the
Second Amendment. It’s a classic example of American exceptionalism,
independence and ingenuity—all the things that make us the land of the
free and home of the brave.
One More Reason
Finally, if none of the above reasons apply to you, get one just to
piss off the leftists and dwarves and antifa who think you should not
be able to own one. Nothing makes them pee their pants in rage than
knowing you have an AR-15 and there's nothing they can do about it.
[chuckle]
should be in the homes of every American citizen that's not a felon or
a dwarf.
https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/content/10-reasons-to-own-an-ar-15/
That couldn’t be further from the truth. Fact is, the AR-15-type rifle
is the most popular rifle in America for many reasons. Here are my Top
10 reasons to own an AR-15, in no particular order:
Self-Defense
Gun-banners would have you believe the AR-15 isn’t useful for home
defense, but they couldn’t be more wrong. NRA commentator and former
Navy SEAL Dom Raso, who now trains individuals in self-defense, said
it best: “For the vast majority of the people I work with, there is no
better firearm to defend their homes against realistic threats than an
AR-15 semi-automatic. It’s easy to learn and easy to use. It’s
accurate. It’s reliable.”
Fun/Recreation
If you can find a rifle out there that’s more fun than the AR-15 to
take to the range and punch some holes in paper, I’m not sure what it
would be. From short-range plinking to longer-range precision
shooting, the gun is easy to shoot—and easy to hit targets with. And,
as you know, nothing’s more fun than hitting what you shoot at.
Teaching/Learning
With simple operation and very low recoil, there’s no better rifle to
teach youngsters the skill of accurate rifle shooting. The fact that
shooting this rifle is easy and tons of fun also makes it great for
starting out new shooters, regardless of age. I’ve yet to take a
beginner—young or old—out to shoot an AR-15 without them getting a
huge smile on their face after the first magazine.
Hunting
The AR-15 and its big brother, the AR-10, are excellent hunting
rifles. AR-15s in 5.56/.223 are perfect for varmints and predator
hunting, and with the proper ammunition can make a great deer rifle.
Of course, the AR-15 is also chambered in a number of other more
powerful cartridges for big game, and the .308-chambered AR-10 is a
deer hunting favorite for many. Don’t buy the gun-banner lie that the
AR-15 can’t be a good hunting rifle.
Tinkering
If you like to tinker, the AR-15 is the rifle for you. Aftermarket
parts and upgrades are readily available from hundreds of sources, and
the gun’s easily understandable operation system makes it simple to
work on. If you can’t build one of these rifles on your kitchen table
with just a few specialized tools (legally, of course), you probably
skipped shop class in high school. Installing new stocks, triggers,
hand guards, pistol grips and other parts is also a breeze.
Farm/Ranch Use
The AR-15 is an excellent all-around rifle for farmers and ranchers to
carry in their trucks for predator control or other utilitarian uses.
Excellent accuracy combined with good magazine capacity is enough to
put the hurt on a pack of coyotes preying on calves or lambs—or on
wild hogs tearing up your alfalfa or wheat field. An AR-15 is also
handy for farmers and ranchers to have on hand in remote areas should
they run into those who would do ill to them.Fact is, the AR-15-type
rifle is the most popular rifle in America for many reasons.
Competitive Shooting
The AR-15 platform is excellent for a variety of competitive shooting
sports. As a 3-gun competitor, I see hundreds of people shoot AR-15s
safely and accurately on a regular basis. Banning ownership of
AR-15-type rifles for law-abiding Americans would be devastating to
3-gun—the fastest growing shooting sport in the country right now.
Disaster Preparedness
I’m not someone who believes in an impending doomsday scenario where
we will all find ourselves in a critical survival situation sometime
soon. But I’m also not one who thinks that couldn’t happen. I don’t
see how any survival situation wouldn’t be made better by having an
AR-15 or two on hand. In fact, the AR-15 might just be the perfect
SHTF firearm.
Bringing Women Into Shooting
Women are currently the fastest-growing demographic in the shooting
sports, and the AR-15 is doubtless one of the reasons why. Women love
the “cool factor” of the AR just as much as men do. And those with
zero shooting experience—who might harbor some fear of rifle shooting
because of a rifle’s perceived “kick”—quickly learn that the
soft-recoiling AR-15 is not only a pleasure to shoot, but fun to
customize just the way they want it.
America’s Rifle
As Dom Raso said in his recent video: “I guarantee you, if the
Founding Fathers would have known this gun was going to be invented,
they wouldn’t have rewritten the Second Amendment, they would have
fortified it in stone. Because they knew the only way for us to stay
free is by having whatever guns the bad guys have. This firearm gives
average people the advantage they so desperately need and deserve to
protect their life, liberty and happiness.”
Owning an AR-15 is as uniquely American as baseball, apple pie and the
Second Amendment. It’s a classic example of American exceptionalism,
independence and ingenuity—all the things that make us the land of the
free and home of the brave.
One More Reason
Finally, if none of the above reasons apply to you, get one just to
piss off the leftists and dwarves and antifa who think you should not
be able to own one. Nothing makes them pee their pants in rage than
knowing you have an AR-15 and there's nothing they can do about it.
[chuckle]
Anonymous
May 31, 2023, 10:31:24 PM5/31/23
to
Mitchell Holman wrote:
> David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote in
> news:JIacnUak9L9YDOr5...@giganews.com:
>
>> On 5/31/23 08:38, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote
>>> in
>>> news:nvge7ilvoou4jf2do...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocks
>>> uck ing.dwarf.com:
>>> an AR 15 for home defense.
>>
>> Why should I care what the police do or do not recommend?
>>
>
>
> So you agree even the police do not
> recommend the AR 15 as a home defense
> weapon.
Fuck the police. They use them. That's reason enough to have TEN.
>>>> Fun/Recreation
>>>>
>>>> If you can find a rifle out there that’s more fun than the AR-15
>>>> to take to the range and punch some holes in paper, I’m not sure
>>>> what it would be. From short-range plinking to longer-range
>>>> precision shooting, the gun is easy to shoot—and easy to hit
>>>> targets with. And, as you know, nothing’s more fun than hitting
>>>> what you shoot at.
>>>
>>>
>>> People die so other people can
>>> have fun. Got it.
>>
>> Yet another Holman thought free post.
>
>
> So much for your claim about
> "resorting to personal attacks"
>>> magazine to bring down a deer needs
>>> a new hobby.
>>
>> Not your business.
>
>
> Evasion noted. Why does any "hunter"
> need 30 rounds to bring down one deer?
You've been educated on this in the past. Now it's time for you to just die.
> David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote in
> news:JIacnUak9L9YDOr5...@giganews.com:
>
>> On 5/31/23 08:38, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote
>>> in
>>> news:nvge7ilvoou4jf2do...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocks
>>> uck ing.dwarf.com:
>>>
>>>> The Constitutionally protected AR-15, also known as "America's
>>>> Rifle," should be in the homes of every American citizen that's not
>>>> a felon or a dwarf.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/content/10-reasons-to-own-an-ar-15
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>> That couldn’t be further from the truth. Fact is, the AR-15-type
>>>> rifle is the most popular rifle in America for many reasons. Here
>>>> are my Top 10 reasons to own an AR-15, in no particular order:
>>>>
>>>> Self-Defense
>>>>
>>>> Gun-banners would have you believe the AR-15 isn’t useful for home
>>>> defense, but they couldn’t be more wrong. NRA commentator and
>>>> former Navy SEAL Dom Raso, who now trains individuals in
>>>> self-defense, said it best: “For the vast majority of the people I
>>>> work with, there is no better firearm to defend their homes against
>>>> realistic threats than an AR-15 semi-automatic. It’s easy to learn
>>>> and easy to use. It’s accurate. It’s reliable.”
>>>>
>>>
>>> Name one police dept that recommends
>>>> The Constitutionally protected AR-15, also known as "America's
>>>> Rifle," should be in the homes of every American citizen that's not
>>>> a felon or a dwarf.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.americas1stfreedom.org/content/10-reasons-to-own-an-ar-15
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>> That couldn’t be further from the truth. Fact is, the AR-15-type
>>>> rifle is the most popular rifle in America for many reasons. Here
>>>> are my Top 10 reasons to own an AR-15, in no particular order:
>>>>
>>>> Self-Defense
>>>>
>>>> Gun-banners would have you believe the AR-15 isn’t useful for home
>>>> defense, but they couldn’t be more wrong. NRA commentator and
>>>> former Navy SEAL Dom Raso, who now trains individuals in
>>>> self-defense, said it best: “For the vast majority of the people I
>>>> work with, there is no better firearm to defend their homes against
>>>> realistic threats than an AR-15 semi-automatic. It’s easy to learn
>>>> and easy to use. It’s accurate. It’s reliable.”
>>>>
>>>
>>> an AR 15 for home defense.
>>
>> Why should I care what the police do or do not recommend?
>>
>
>
> So you agree even the police do not
> recommend the AR 15 as a home defense
> weapon.
Fuck the police. They use them. That's reason enough to have TEN.
>>>> Fun/Recreation
>>>>
>>>> If you can find a rifle out there that’s more fun than the AR-15
>>>> to take to the range and punch some holes in paper, I’m not sure
>>>> what it would be. From short-range plinking to longer-range
>>>> precision shooting, the gun is easy to shoot—and easy to hit
>>>> targets with. And, as you know, nothing’s more fun than hitting
>>>> what you shoot at.
>>>
>>>
>>> have fun. Got it.
>>
>> Yet another Holman thought free post.
>
>
> So much for your claim about
> "resorting to personal attacks"
>
>>
>>
>>>> Hunting
>>>>
>>>> The AR-15 and its big brother, the AR-10, are excellent hunting
>>>> rifles. AR-15s in 5.56/.223 are perfect for varmints and predator
>>>> hunting, and with the proper ammunition can make a great deer rifle.
>>>> Of course, the AR-15 is also chambered in a number of other more
>>>> powerful cartridges for big game, and the .308-chambered AR-10 is a
>>>> deer hunting favorite for many. Don’t buy the gun-banner lie that
>>>> the AR-15 can’t be a good hunting rifle.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyone who needs a 30 round
>>
>>
>>>> Hunting
>>>>
>>>> The AR-15 and its big brother, the AR-10, are excellent hunting
>>>> rifles. AR-15s in 5.56/.223 are perfect for varmints and predator
>>>> hunting, and with the proper ammunition can make a great deer rifle.
>>>> Of course, the AR-15 is also chambered in a number of other more
>>>> powerful cartridges for big game, and the .308-chambered AR-10 is a
>>>> deer hunting favorite for many. Don’t buy the gun-banner lie that
>>>> the AR-15 can’t be a good hunting rifle.
>>>
>>>
>>> magazine to bring down a deer needs
>>> a new hobby.
>>
>> Not your business.
>
>
> Evasion noted. Why does any "hunter"
> need 30 rounds to bring down one deer?
You've been educated on this in the past. Now it's time for you to just die.
Lou Bricano
May 31, 2023, 11:10:57 PM5/31/23
to
If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
Rudy Canoza
May 31, 2023, 11:46:54 PM5/31/23
to
On 31 May 2023, Lou Bricano <l...@cap.con> posted some
news:3%TdM.624599$qjm2....@fx09.iad:
Tell that to a soldier in a combat theatre.
> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
Not by you.
news:3%TdM.624599$qjm2....@fx09.iad:
> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
David Hartung
Jun 1, 2023, 6:27:47 AM6/1/23
to
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 1, 2023, 6:53:59 AM6/1/23
to
[Default] On Wed, 31 May 2023 20:10:55 -0700, "Cunt Flaps," Canoza
typed:
>
>No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>
>If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
Yes, EVERYONE has a legitimate lawful *need* for *ANY* sized magazine.
And, no, "Cunt Flaps," nobody will be taking them from anyone.
You're well aware of this.
typed:
>
>No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>
>If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
And, no, "Cunt Flaps," nobody will be taking them from anyone.
You're well aware of this.
Governor Swill
Jun 1, 2023, 9:08:07 AM6/1/23
to
Congratulations!
*click*
*click*
Lou Bricano
Jun 1, 2023, 10:39:37 AM6/1/23
to
Baxter
Jun 1, 2023, 10:57:44 AM6/1/23
to
David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote in
news:_5OdnR1wWJQE7-X5...@giganews.com:
Actually, the Constitution specifies that only guns suitable for training
in a militia are protected - and it's up to Congress to spell out how
Militias are armed.
Lou Bricano
Jun 1, 2023, 10:59:59 AM6/1/23
to
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 1, 2023, 12:56:20 PM6/1/23
to
[Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:57:42 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_s...@baxcode.com> typed:
>
>Is there anything in the Consitution about magazine size for guns?
>Actually, the Constitution specifies that only guns suitable for training
>in a militia are protected - and it's up to Congress to spell out how
>Militias are armed.
No, it does not specify that at all.
That's something you and "Cunt Flaps" Canoza made up.
<bax02_s...@baxcode.com> typed:
>
>Is there anything in the Consitution about magazine size for guns?
>Actually, the Constitution specifies that only guns suitable for training
>in a militia are protected - and it's up to Congress to spell out how
>Militias are armed.
That's something you and "Cunt Flaps" Canoza made up.
David Hartung
Jun 1, 2023, 1:08:37 PM6/1/23
to
constitutional.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 1, 2023, 1:32:10 PM6/1/23
to
[Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:08:25 -0500, David Hartung
<ju...@nogood.com> typed:
He can't. He's not even sure what a "magazine" is.
<ju...@nogood.com> typed:
Lou Bricano
Jun 1, 2023, 1:47:07 PM6/1/23
to
The comma, as usual, is wrong.
The answer is, because if you don't have a "right" to such a magazine, then the
government has a constitutional power to set a limit. It is within the implied
police power of the government to do so.
The government can limit gun accessories in exactly the same way that Scalia
said they can limit some guns. The right to arms, and all the parts that go
into them, is not unlimited. And no, those limits do not have to be spelled out
in the Constitution, because as I have previously instructed you, the limits are
inherent to the right itself, which the Constitution takes as pre-defined.
David Hartung
Jun 1, 2023, 2:47:05 PM6/1/23
to
Scout
Jun 1, 2023, 3:26:58 PM6/1/23
to
message
news:rbjh7i98dodq380cu...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
Well, let's see.. what does the National Guard use?
Select fire AR styled machine guns with high capacity magazines?
How about the squad light machine gun?
Is Rudy really telling us that we should own actual machine guns, instead of
merely semi-automatics?
news:rbjh7i98dodq380cu...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
Select fire AR styled machine guns with high capacity magazines?
How about the squad light machine gun?
Is Rudy really telling us that we should own actual machine guns, instead of
merely semi-automatics?
Lou Bricano
Jun 1, 2023, 3:31:00 PM6/1/23
to
Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is
*not unlimited*. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases,
commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was
not a right to keep and carry *any weapon whatsoever* in any
manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.
[emphasis added]
It means that *some* guns may be banned, and there is no infringement of the
right to arms. The right to arms is not a right to just whatever arms you wish.
You don't have a right to just whatever capacity magazine you wish, either.
This is not in rational dispute.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 1, 2023, 4:11:52 PM6/1/23
to
[Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 10:47:05 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<l...@cap.con> typed:
==================================================
==================================================
================= WARNING! ========================
**** DESPERATE RUDY GRAMMAR FLAME AHEAD ****
================= WARNING! ========================
==================================================
==================================================
>The comma, as usual, is wrong.
>
>The answer is, because if you don't have a "right" to such a magazine, then the
>government has a constitutional power to set a limit. It is within the implied
>police power of the government to do so.
We have the right. "Cunt Flaps" can't point out where the right is
denied.
<l...@cap.con> typed:
==================================================
==================================================
================= WARNING! ========================
**** DESPERATE RUDY GRAMMAR FLAME AHEAD ****
================= WARNING! ========================
==================================================
==================================================
>The comma, as usual, is wrong.
>
>The answer is, because if you don't have a "right" to such a magazine, then the
>government has a constitutional power to set a limit. It is within the implied
>police power of the government to do so.
denied.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 1, 2023, 4:13:37 PM6/1/23
to
[Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:30:56 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
<l...@cap.con> typed:
>Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is
> *not unlimited*. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases,
> commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was
> not a right to keep and carry *any weapon whatsoever* in any
> manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.
> [emphasis added]
>
>It means that *some* guns may be banned, and there is no infringement of the
>right to arms.
No, it doesn't mean that, you stupid cock sucker.
It means you don't have a right to carry a gun onto private property
in order to rob it.
How did you get to be such a statist anyway?
<l...@cap.con> typed:
>Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is
> *not unlimited*. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases,
> commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was
> not a right to keep and carry *any weapon whatsoever* in any
> manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.
> [emphasis added]
>
>It means that *some* guns may be banned, and there is no infringement of the
>right to arms.
It means you don't have a right to carry a gun onto private property
in order to rob it.
How did you get to be such a statist anyway?
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 1, 2023, 4:14:29 PM6/1/23
to
[Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:30:21 -0500, "Scout"
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
Hard to tell. As dumb as Baxter is, and being a Democrat and all, he
has no idea what he's talking about when it comes to firearms.
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
has no idea what he's talking about when it comes to firearms.
James Bond
Jun 1, 2023, 4:37:50 PM6/1/23
to
On 01 Jun 2023, Lou Bricano <l...@cap.con> posted some
news:Pl6eM.627811$Olad....@fx35.iad:
Scalia is dead and so is his opinion. His opinion is not law. You are
waving an empty bag of farts.
news:Pl6eM.627811$Olad....@fx35.iad:
waving an empty bag of farts.
scan here
Jun 1, 2023, 5:36:03 PM6/1/23
to
On 01 Jun 2023, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> posted some
news:tvuh7it83svnbthvq...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
Aren't they resident experts on lighting farts?
<klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> posted some
news:tvuh7it83svnbthvq...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 1, 2023, 5:42:04 PM6/1/23
to
[Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 21:36:01 -0000 (UTC), scan here
<no...@none.com> typed:
That's the only weapon they have available. GOOD NEWS: Perfect for
leftist self defense, depending on diet. BAD NEWS: Usually one shot
only.
<no...@none.com> typed:
leftist self defense, depending on diet. BAD NEWS: Usually one shot
only.
Salty Stan
Jun 1, 2023, 5:48:17 PM6/1/23
to
On 6/1/2023 10:30 AM, scooter lied:
>
>
> KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, lied:
>> [Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:57:42 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>> <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>>
>>> Is there anything in the Consitution about magazine size for guns?
>>> Actually, the Constitution specifies that only guns suitable for training
>>> in a militia are protected - and it's up to Congress to spell out how
>>> Militias are armed.
>>
>> No, it does not specify that at all.
>>
>> That's something you and "Cunt Flaps" Canoza made up.
>
> Well, let's see.. what does the National Guard use?
>
> Select fire AR styled machine guns with high capacity magazines?
If the National Guard is deployed during a period of civil unrest, scooter, they
do *not* have high capacity magazines. You lied, scooter.
>
>
> KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, lied:
>> [Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:57:42 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>> <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> typed:
>>
>>>
>>> Is there anything in the Consitution about magazine size for guns?
>>> Actually, the Constitution specifies that only guns suitable for training
>>> in a militia are protected - and it's up to Congress to spell out how
>>> Militias are armed.
>>
>> No, it does not specify that at all.
>>
>> That's something you and "Cunt Flaps" Canoza made up.
>
> Well, let's see.. what does the National Guard use?
>
> Select fire AR styled machine guns with high capacity magazines?
do *not* have high capacity magazines. You lied, scooter.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 1, 2023, 5:54:44 PM6/1/23
to
[Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:48:17 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
typed:
>If the National Guard is deployed during a period of civil unrest, scooter, they
>do *not* have high capacity magazines. You lied, scooter.
Yes, they do, you ignorant moron. They use the same weapons as the
U.S. Army.
FUCK but your gun knowledge is zero!
ROFLMAO!!!!!!
https://www.dvidshub.net/image/6760909/soldier-with-charlie-company-1-185th-infantry-regiment-california-army-national-guard-aims-his-sights-during-live-fire
A Soldier with Charlie Company 1-185th Infantry Regiment, California
Army National Guard, aims his sights during a live-fire exercise at
the National Training Center in Fort Irwin, California, July 30, 2021.
https://www.dvidshub.net/image/6760907/soldiers-with-charlie-company-1-185th-infantry-regiment-california-army-national-guard-aim-their-sights-during-live-fire-exercise
Soldiers with Charlie Company 1-185th Infantry Regiment, California
Army National Guard, aim their sights during a live-fire exercise at
the National Training Center in Fort Irwin, California, July 30, 2021.
https://www.dvidshub.net/image/6760905/soldier-with-charlie-company-1-185th-infantry-regiment-california-army-national-guard-aims-down-his-sight-during-live
A Soldier with Charlie Company 1-185th Infantry Regiment, California
Army National Guard, aims down his sight during a live-fire exercise
at the National Training Center in Fort Irwin, California, July 30,
2021. [Image 4 of 8]
typed:
>If the National Guard is deployed during a period of civil unrest, scooter, they
>do *not* have high capacity magazines. You lied, scooter.
U.S. Army.
FUCK but your gun knowledge is zero!
ROFLMAO!!!!!!
https://www.dvidshub.net/image/6760909/soldier-with-charlie-company-1-185th-infantry-regiment-california-army-national-guard-aims-his-sights-during-live-fire
A Soldier with Charlie Company 1-185th Infantry Regiment, California
Army National Guard, aims his sights during a live-fire exercise at
the National Training Center in Fort Irwin, California, July 30, 2021.
https://www.dvidshub.net/image/6760907/soldiers-with-charlie-company-1-185th-infantry-regiment-california-army-national-guard-aim-their-sights-during-live-fire-exercise
Soldiers with Charlie Company 1-185th Infantry Regiment, California
Army National Guard, aim their sights during a live-fire exercise at
the National Training Center in Fort Irwin, California, July 30, 2021.
https://www.dvidshub.net/image/6760905/soldier-with-charlie-company-1-185th-infantry-regiment-california-army-national-guard-aims-down-his-sight-during-live
A Soldier with Charlie Company 1-185th Infantry Regiment, California
Army National Guard, aims down his sight during a live-fire exercise
at the National Training Center in Fort Irwin, California, July 30,
2021. [Image 4 of 8]
Governor Swill
Jun 1, 2023, 6:26:15 PM6/1/23
to
Swill
--
We need to look past ourselves, our parties and our disagreements
and put our democracy first. - Arnold Schwarzenegger
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine! Putin is a condom!
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 1, 2023, 6:35:53 PM6/1/23
to
[Default] On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 18:26:13 -0400, Governor Swill
<governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:08:25 -0500, David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote:
>
>>On 6/1/23 09:39, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2023 3:27 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/23 22:10, Lou Bricano wrote:
>
>>>>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>>>
>>>> Why is a limit on magazine size constitutional?
>>>
>>> You don't have a "right" to a magazine of any capacity you wish.
>>
>>So you have said, what you haven't explained is why a limit is
>>constitutional.
>
>Allowance for regulation is in there.
We're taking about infringement, not regulation.
<governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:08:25 -0500, David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote:
>
>>On 6/1/23 09:39, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2023 3:27 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/23 22:10, Lou Bricano wrote:
>
>>>>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>>>
>>>> Why is a limit on magazine size constitutional?
>>>
>>> You don't have a "right" to a magazine of any capacity you wish.
>>
>>So you have said, what you haven't explained is why a limit is
>>constitutional.
>
>Allowance for regulation is in there.
scan here
Jun 1, 2023, 7:00:03 PM6/1/23
to
On 01 Jun 2023, Salty Stan <wsjam...@gmail.com> posted some
news:zm8eM.2356176$Tcw8.2...@fx10.iad:
You need to brush up on your military weaponry. We mostly used 20 round
mags in the A1s (And A2s) because the pant-shitter city boys would flip on
full auto, empty the 30 round mag at nothing, or jam it up, then beg for
help and ammo. Trying to teach them didn't work either so the A2 was
modified to fire 3 round bursts to cut down wasting ammo. 30 round mags
were not all that common.
news:zm8eM.2356176$Tcw8.2...@fx10.iad:
mags in the A1s (And A2s) because the pant-shitter city boys would flip on
full auto, empty the 30 round mag at nothing, or jam it up, then beg for
help and ammo. Trying to teach them didn't work either so the A2 was
modified to fire 3 round bursts to cut down wasting ammo. 30 round mags
were not all that common.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 1, 2023, 7:04:46 PM6/1/23
to
[Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 23:00:00 -0000 (UTC), scan here
<no...@none.com> typed:
>On 01 Jun 2023, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed"
thinks it's an edition of "The Atlantic" with extra pages.
<no...@none.com> typed:
>On 01 Jun 2023, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed"
>
>> On 6/1/2023 10:30 AM, scooter lied:
>>>
>>>
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude, thousands of times smarter than Rudy, typed;
>> On 6/1/2023 10:30 AM, scooter lied:
>>>
>>>
>>
>>>> [Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:57:42 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>> <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anything in the Consitution about magazine size for guns?
>>>>> Actually, the Constitution specifies that only guns suitable for
>>>>> training in a militia are protected - and it's up to Congress to
>>>>> spell out how Militias are armed.
>>>>
>>>> No, it does not specify that at all.
>>>>
>>>> That's something you and "Cunt Flaps" Canoza made up.
>>>
>>> Well, let's see.. what does the National Guard use?
>>>
>>> Select fire AR styled machine guns with high capacity magazines?
>>
>> If the National Guard is deployed during a period of civil unrest,
>> scooter, they do *not* have high capacity magazines. You lied,
>> scooter.
>
>You need to brush up on your military weaponry. We mostly used 20 round
>mags in the A1s (And A2s) because the pant-shitter city boys would flip on
>full auto, empty the 30 round mag at nothing, or jam it up, then beg for
>help and ammo. Trying to teach them didn't work either so the A2 was
>modified to fire 3 round bursts to cut down wasting ammo. 30 round mags
>were not all that common.
"Cunt Flaps" doesn't even know what a "high capacity" magazine is. He
>>>> [Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:57:42 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
>>>> <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anything in the Consitution about magazine size for guns?
>>>>> Actually, the Constitution specifies that only guns suitable for
>>>>> training in a militia are protected - and it's up to Congress to
>>>>> spell out how Militias are armed.
>>>>
>>>> No, it does not specify that at all.
>>>>
>>>> That's something you and "Cunt Flaps" Canoza made up.
>>>
>>> Well, let's see.. what does the National Guard use?
>>>
>>> Select fire AR styled machine guns with high capacity magazines?
>>
>> If the National Guard is deployed during a period of civil unrest,
>> scooter, they do *not* have high capacity magazines. You lied,
>> scooter.
>
>You need to brush up on your military weaponry. We mostly used 20 round
>mags in the A1s (And A2s) because the pant-shitter city boys would flip on
>full auto, empty the 30 round mag at nothing, or jam it up, then beg for
>help and ammo. Trying to teach them didn't work either so the A2 was
>modified to fire 3 round bursts to cut down wasting ammo. 30 round mags
>were not all that common.
thinks it's an edition of "The Atlantic" with extra pages.
Anonymous
Jun 1, 2023, 9:55:45 PM6/1/23
to
Lou Bricano wrote:
> On 5/31/2023 7:31 PM, Anonymous wrote:
>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote in
>>> news:JIacnUak9L9YDOr5...@giganews.com:
>>>
>>>> On 5/31/23 08:38, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> news:nvge7ilvoou4jf2do...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocks
> On 5/31/2023 7:31 PM, Anonymous wrote:
>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote in
>>> news:JIacnUak9L9YDOr5...@giganews.com:
>>>
>>>> On 5/31/23 08:38, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>
Besides, try to stop us from using 3D printers to produce more.
Mitchell Holman
Jun 1, 2023, 10:01:56 PM6/1/23
to
David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote in
news:ru-cnd2bPMAAeuX5...@giganews.com:
Because you say so.
Lou Bricano
Jun 1, 2023, 10:32:09 PM6/1/23
to
>
>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>
>
> Anyone who tries will need to be killed.
Baxter
Jun 1, 2023, 11:14:48 PM6/1/23
to
Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
> Lou Bricano wrote:
>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>
> Yes they do.
>
Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
magazine? Explain.
> Lou Bricano wrote:
>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>
> Yes they do.
>
magazine? Explain.
Pork Chops
Jun 1, 2023, 11:28:25 PM6/1/23
to
Baxter <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in news:u5bmr6$32s86$4@dont-
email.me:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yk0uvoSWA2I
Crop defense. Why don't you put your save-the-hog hat on and tell this
fella you'd like some of those hogs for Oregon?
email.me:
Crop defense. Why don't you put your save-the-hog hat on and tell this
fella you'd like some of those hogs for Oregon?
demo
Jun 1, 2023, 11:53:47 PM6/1/23
to
Mike Colangelo
Jun 2, 2023, 12:16:59 AM6/2/23
to
On 6/1/2023 8:28 PM, Pork Chops wrote:
> Baxter <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in news:u5bmr6$32s86$4@dont-
> email.me:
>
>> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>>
>>> Lou Bricano wrote:
>>
>>>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>>>
>>> Yes they do.
>>>
>> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
>> magazine? Explain.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/
Videos not allowed.
> Baxter <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in news:u5bmr6$32s86$4@dont-
> email.me:
>
>> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>>
>>> Lou Bricano wrote:
>>
>>>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>>>
>>> Yes they do.
>>>
>> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
>> magazine? Explain.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 2, 2023, 6:54:50 AM6/2/23
to
[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 03:14:46 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_s...@baxcode.com> typed:
To shoot 30 times without reloading.
<bax02_s...@baxcode.com> typed:
Scout
Jun 2, 2023, 9:28:22 AM6/2/23
to
message
news:spuh7iphd9sj8kk64...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
What's amusing is that even Rudy can't deny our right.
See the keyword "IF"
His whole argument depends on the fantasy of that 'if'
Like IF Rudy were intelligent he would know what he's talking about.
Of course, we all know that if is pure fantasy.
news:spuh7iphd9sj8kk64...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
See the keyword "IF"
His whole argument depends on the fantasy of that 'if'
Like IF Rudy were intelligent he would know what he's talking about.
Of course, we all know that if is pure fantasy.
Scout
Jun 2, 2023, 9:28:24 AM6/2/23
to
"Salty Stan" <wsjam...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:zm8eM.2356176$Tcw8.2...@fx10.iad...
AR style guns.
Scout
Jun 2, 2023, 9:28:24 AM6/2/23
to
news:4l4i7i53d27kapluv...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
magazine and thus would and should not be banned because of that capacity.
In short, if we accept Rudy at his word above, then the standard capacity
magazine can NOT be banned whether that capacity is 4 rounds, 15 rounds, 20
rounds or even 200 rounds.
Indeed, we could even make the argument that any magazine capacity produced
by any manufacture are standard capacity because that is the capacity they
were made to hold. So a high capacity magazine would ONLY refer to magazines
modified AFTER manufacture to hold more than they were designed to hold.
So if you were to take a 20 round magazine cut off the end, lengthen the
string and glue on exact length so it could hold say 30 rounds instead of 20
that would be a high capacity magazine according to Rudy. However, if a
manufacturer builds a 30 round magazine.. then that's a standard capacity
magazine because that's what it was designed to hold.
So any magazine not modified later would, according to Rudy, NOT be a high
capacity magazine no matter how many rounds it holds.
Of course, now that Rudy understands the ramifications of his assertion.. he
will now deny ever saying it.
> [Default] On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:48:17 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
> typed:
>
>>If the National Guard is deployed during a period of civil unrest,
>>scooter, they
>>do *not* have high capacity magazines. You lied, scooter.
>
> Yes, they do, you ignorant moron. They use the same weapons as the
> U.S. Army.
Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD capacity
> typed:
>
>>If the National Guard is deployed during a period of civil unrest,
>>scooter, they
>>do *not* have high capacity magazines. You lied, scooter.
>
> Yes, they do, you ignorant moron. They use the same weapons as the
> U.S. Army.
magazine and thus would and should not be banned because of that capacity.
In short, if we accept Rudy at his word above, then the standard capacity
magazine can NOT be banned whether that capacity is 4 rounds, 15 rounds, 20
rounds or even 200 rounds.
Indeed, we could even make the argument that any magazine capacity produced
by any manufacture are standard capacity because that is the capacity they
were made to hold. So a high capacity magazine would ONLY refer to magazines
modified AFTER manufacture to hold more than they were designed to hold.
So if you were to take a 20 round magazine cut off the end, lengthen the
string and glue on exact length so it could hold say 30 rounds instead of 20
that would be a high capacity magazine according to Rudy. However, if a
manufacturer builds a 30 round magazine.. then that's a standard capacity
magazine because that's what it was designed to hold.
So any magazine not modified later would, according to Rudy, NOT be a high
capacity magazine no matter how many rounds it holds.
Of course, now that Rudy understands the ramifications of his assertion.. he
will now deny ever saying it.
Scout
Jun 2, 2023, 9:28:25 AM6/2/23
to
"Governor Swill" <governo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:nm6i7i1d5hmbnloe5...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:08:25 -0500, David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote:
>
>>On 6/1/23 09:39, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2023 3:27 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/23 22:10, Lou Bricano wrote:
>
>>>>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>>>
>>>> Why is a limit on magazine size constitutional?
>>>
>>> You don't have a "right" to a magazine of any capacity you wish.
>>
>>So you have said, what you haven't explained is why a limit is
>>constitutional.
>
> Allowance for regulation is in there.
Where? Point it out.
>
>>On 6/1/23 09:39, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2023 3:27 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/23 22:10, Lou Bricano wrote:
>
>>>>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>>>
>>>> Why is a limit on magazine size constitutional?
>>>
>>> You don't have a "right" to a magazine of any capacity you wish.
>>
>>So you have said, what you haven't explained is why a limit is
>>constitutional.
>
> Allowance for regulation is in there.
Scout
Jun 2, 2023, 9:28:26 AM6/2/23
to
"Baxter" <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in message
news:u5bmr6$32s86$4...@dont-email.me...
> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>
>> Lou Bricano wrote:
>
>>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>
>> Lou Bricano wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes they do.
>>
> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
> magazine? Explain.
I want it.
>> Yes they do.
>>
> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
> magazine? Explain.
That's all the legitimate and lawful need that I need to provide.
And given the military uses magazines of 30 rounds and over.. I think you
would have a hard time showing they wouldn't serve a military/militia need.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 2, 2023, 9:55:01 AM6/2/23
to
[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:58:46 -0500, "Scout"
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
Rudy's fantasy is to be tall enough where he could go door to door to
collect our AR-15's and "high capacity" magazines.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/cc/10/d0/cc10d05078359993f389278727d3e801--hate-everyone-affiliation.jpg
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
collect our AR-15's and "high capacity" magazines.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/cc/10/d0/cc10d05078359993f389278727d3e801--hate-everyone-affiliation.jpg
Salty Stan
Jun 2, 2023, 10:50:51 AM6/2/23
to
On 6/2/2023 6:15 AM, scooter lied:
>
>
> "Baxter" <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> news:u5bmr6$32s86$4...@dont-email.me...
>> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>>
>>> Lou Bricano wrote:
>>
>>>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>>>
>>> Yes they do.
>>>
>> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
>> magazine? Explain.
>
> I want it.
You don't have a right to it, scooter. And you have no lawful purpose for it.
>
> "Baxter" <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in message
> news:u5bmr6$32s86$4...@dont-email.me...
>> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>>
>>> Lou Bricano wrote:
>>
>>>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>>>
>>> Yes they do.
>>>
>> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
>> magazine? Explain.
>
> I want it.
Salty Stan
Jun 2, 2023, 10:50:52 AM6/2/23
to
On 6/2/2023 6:11 AM, scooter lied:
>
> Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD capacity
> magazine
For combat deployment, scooter. Not for civil disturbances, scooter.
>
>
> KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, lied:
>>
>> Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, *wrote*:
>
> KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, lied:
>>
>>
>>> If the National Guard is deployed during a period of civil unrest, scooter, they
>>> do *not* have high capacity magazines. You lied, scooter.
>>
>> Yes, they do,
No, cunt flaps, they do not.
>>> If the National Guard is deployed during a period of civil unrest, scooter, they
>>> do *not* have high capacity magazines. You lied, scooter.
>>
>> Yes, they do,
>
> Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD capacity
> magazine
Salty Stan
Jun 2, 2023, 10:50:52 AM6/2/23
to
power to regulate and mitigate threats to public safety. The state cannot
categorically regulate arms out of existence, scooter, but it *can* regulate
which arms you are permitted to have. No RPGs, now howitzers, no 30 round
magazines. You'd like to have them, scooter, because of your tiny pin dick
inadequacies, but you don't have a right to them. This is settled, scooter.
Salty Stan
Jun 2, 2023, 10:50:53 AM6/2/23
to
On 6/2/2023 6:01 AM, scooter lied:
They don't have 20 round magazines when deployed for a civil disturbance, scooter.
Lou Bricano
Jun 2, 2023, 10:50:54 AM6/2/23
to
On 6/2/2023 5:58 AM, scooter lied:
>
> What's amusing is that even Rudy can't deny our right.
The right is not what you stupidly think it is, scooter. The right is not a
right to just whatever arms and arms accoutrements you wish, scooter. This is
settled, scooter.
>
>
> KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, lied:
>>
>> Rudy Canoza, the intellectual, moral, professional, social, literary and physical superior to KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, *wrote*:
>
> KKKlaun SchittenPantzen, impotent and harmless Nazi fake Jew, lied:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> The comma, as usual, is wrong.
>>>
>>> The answer is, because if you don't have a "right" to such a magazine, then the
>>> government has a constitutional power to set a limit. It is within the implied
>>> police power of the government to do so.
>>
>> We have the right.
You don't have a right to that.
>>
>>
>>> The comma, as usual, is wrong.
>>>
>>> The answer is, because if you don't have a "right" to such a magazine, then the
>>> government has a constitutional power to set a limit. It is within the implied
>>> police power of the government to do so.
>>
>> We have the right.
>
> What's amusing is that even Rudy can't deny our right.
right to just whatever arms and arms accoutrements you wish, scooter. This is
settled, scooter.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 2, 2023, 11:30:20 AM6/2/23
to
[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:35 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
typed:
>On 6/2/2023 5:58 AM, Scout tried-- and failed-- to educate "Cunt Flaps" Canoza by typing:
>>
>>
>> Klaus humiliated Rudy AGAIN by typing:
>>>
>>> Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza lied by typing :
>> What's amusing is that even Rudy can't deny our right.
>
>The right is
there, and there's nothing you can do about it, dwarf.
typed:
>On 6/2/2023 5:58 AM, Scout tried-- and failed-- to educate "Cunt Flaps" Canoza by typing:
>>
>>
>> Klaus humiliated Rudy AGAIN by typing:
>>>
>>> Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza lied by typing :
>>>
>>>>> ==================================================
>>>>> ==================================================
>>>>> ================= WARNING! ========================
>>>>> **** DESPERATE RUDY GRAMMAR FLAME AHEAD ****
>>>>> ================= WARNING! ========================
>>>>> ==================================================
>>>>> ==================================================
>>>
>>>>> ==================================================
>>>>> ==================================================
>>>>> ================= WARNING! ========================
>>>>> **** DESPERATE RUDY GRAMMAR FLAME AHEAD ****
>>>>> ================= WARNING! ========================
>>>>> ==================================================
>>>>> ==================================================
>>>
>>>> The comma, as usual, is wrong.
>>>>
>>>> The answer is, because if you don't have a "right" to such a magazine, then the
>>>> government has a constitutional power to set a limit. It is within the implied
>>>> police power of the government to do so.
>>>
>>> We have the right.
>
>You don't have a right to that.
>
Yeah, we do, "Cunt Flaps"
>>>>
>>>> The answer is, because if you don't have a "right" to such a magazine, then the
>>>> government has a constitutional power to set a limit. It is within the implied
>>>> police power of the government to do so.
>>>
>>> We have the right.
>
>You don't have a right to that.
>
>> What's amusing is that even Rudy can't deny our right.
>
>The right is
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 2, 2023, 11:31:13 AM6/2/23
to
[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:34 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
typed:
>On 6/2/2023 6:12 AM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Governor Swill" <governo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:nm6i7i1d5hmbnloe5...@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:08:25 -0500, David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 6/1/23 09:39, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
typed:
>On 6/2/2023 6:12 AM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Governor Swill" <governo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:nm6i7i1d5hmbnloe5...@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:08:25 -0500, David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On 6/1/2023 3:27 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/31/23 22:10, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
>>>
>>>>>>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is a limit on magazine size constitutional?
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't have a "right" to a magazine of any capacity you wish.
>>>>
>>>> So you have said, what you haven't explained is why a limit is
>>>> constitutional.
>>>
>>> Allowance for regulation is in there.
>>
>> Where? Point it out.
>
>In the implied police powers of the state, scooter. The state has an implied
>power to regulate and mitigate threats to public safety.
Magazines are not a threat
>>>>>>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is a limit on magazine size constitutional?
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't have a "right" to a magazine of any capacity you wish.
>>>>
>>>> So you have said, what you haven't explained is why a limit is
>>>> constitutional.
>>>
>>> Allowance for regulation is in there.
>>
>> Where? Point it out.
>
>In the implied police powers of the state, scooter. The state has an implied
>power to regulate and mitigate threats to public safety.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 2, 2023, 11:32:01 AM6/2/23
to
[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:35 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
typed::
>On 6/2/2023 6:11 AM, Scout typed:
>> Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD capacity
>> magazine
>
>For combat deployment, scooter. Not for civil disturbances, scooter.
STILL awaiting your cite, "Cunt Flaps"
typed::
>On 6/2/2023 6:11 AM, Scout typed:
>> Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD capacity
>> magazine
>
>For combat deployment, scooter. Not for civil disturbances, scooter.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 2, 2023, 11:32:23 AM6/2/23
to
[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:35 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
typed::
typed::
>They don't have 20 round magazines when deployed for a civil disturbance, scooter.
Cite, "Cunt Flaps"
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 2, 2023, 11:33:15 AM6/2/23
to
[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:34 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
typed:
>On 6/2/2023 6:15 AM, scooter lied:
>>
>>
>> "Baxter" <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>> news:u5bmr6$32s86$4...@dont-email.me...
>>> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>>>
>>>> "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed::
>>>
>>>>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
typed:
>On 6/2/2023 6:15 AM, scooter lied:
>>
>>
>> "Baxter" <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>> news:u5bmr6$32s86$4...@dont-email.me...
>>> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>>>>
>>>> Yes they do.
>>>>
>>> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
>>> magazine? Explain.
>>
>> I want it.
>
>You don't have a right to it, scooter. And you have no lawful purpose for it.
"Cunt Flaps" can't define "lawful purpose.
>>>> Yes they do.
>>>>
>>> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
>>> magazine? Explain.
>>
>> I want it.
>
>You don't have a right to it, scooter. And you have no lawful purpose for it.
Governor Swill
Jun 2, 2023, 2:07:20 PM6/2/23
to
Swill
--
We need to look past ourselves, our parties and our disagreements
and put our democracy first. - Arnold Schwarzenegger
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Sláva Ukrajíni! Glory to Ukraine! Putin is a condom!
Governor Swill
Jun 2, 2023, 2:11:03 PM6/2/23
to
On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 15:35:46 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>[Default] On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 18:26:13 -0400, Governor Swill
><governo...@gmail.com> typed:
So "regulation" and "infringement" are not the same thing. Got it.
<klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>[Default] On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 18:26:13 -0400, Governor Swill
><governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>>>On 6/1/23 09:39, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>>> On 6/1/2023 3:27 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 6/1/2023 3:27 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>> On 5/31/23 22:10, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>
>>>>>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is a limit on magazine size constitutional?
>>>>
>>>> You don't have a "right" to a magazine of any capacity you wish.
>>>
>>>So you have said, what you haven't explained is why a limit is
>>>constitutional.
>>
>>Allowance for regulation is in there.
>
>We're taking about infringement, not regulation.
>>
>>>>>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is a limit on magazine size constitutional?
>>>>
>>>> You don't have a "right" to a magazine of any capacity you wish.
>>>
>>>So you have said, what you haven't explained is why a limit is
>>>constitutional.
>>
>>Allowance for regulation is in there.
>
So "regulation" and "infringement" are not the same thing. Got it.
Governor Swill
Jun 2, 2023, 2:11:39 PM6/2/23
to
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 2, 2023, 2:20:00 PM6/2/23
to
[Default] On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 14:10:59 -0400, Governor Swill
<governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 15:35:46 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 18:26:13 -0400, Governor Swill
>><governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>>
>>>On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:08:25 -0500, David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 6/1/23 09:39, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>>>> On 6/1/2023 3:27 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/31/23 22:10, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is a limit on magazine size constitutional?
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't have a "right" to a magazine of any capacity you wish.
>>>>
>>>>So you have said, what you haven't explained is why a limit is
>>>>constitutional.
>>>
>>>Allowance for regulation is in there.
>>
>>We're taking about infringement, not regulation.
>
>So "regulation" and "infringement" are not the same thing. Got it.
I'm glad I could help you understand.
>On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 15:35:46 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Thu, 01 Jun 2023 18:26:13 -0400, Governor Swill
>><governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>>
>>>On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:08:25 -0500, David Hartung <ju...@nogood.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 6/1/23 09:39, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>>>> On 6/1/2023 3:27 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/31/23 22:10, Lou Bricano wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> If you have one, it's going to be taken from you...constitutionally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is a limit on magazine size constitutional?
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't have a "right" to a magazine of any capacity you wish.
>>>>
>>>>So you have said, what you haven't explained is why a limit is
>>>>constitutional.
>>>
>>>Allowance for regulation is in there.
>>
>>We're taking about infringement, not regulation.
>
>So "regulation" and "infringement" are not the same thing. Got it.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 2, 2023, 2:20:54 PM6/2/23
to
[Default] On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 14:07:17 -0400, Governor Swill
<governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:31:51 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:35 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>>typed::
>>
>>>On 6/2/2023 6:11 AM, Scout typed:
>>
>>>> Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD capacity
>>>> magazine
>>>
>>>For combat deployment, scooter. Not for civil disturbances, scooter.
>>
>>STILL awaiting your cite, "Cunt Flaps"
>
>Because yours was wrong.
Yet "Cunt Flaps" Canoza has failed time and again to prove what he
claims is true.
Maybe you can help him.
<governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:31:51 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:35 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>>typed::
>>
>>>On 6/2/2023 6:11 AM, Scout typed:
>>
>>>> Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD capacity
>>>> magazine
>>>
>>>For combat deployment, scooter. Not for civil disturbances, scooter.
>>
>>STILL awaiting your cite, "Cunt Flaps"
>
>Because yours was wrong.
claims is true.
Maybe you can help him.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 2, 2023, 2:22:04 PM6/2/23
to
[Default] On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 14:11:36 -0400, Governor Swill
<governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 21:16:57 -0700, Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con> wrote:
>
>>On 6/1/2023 8:28 PM, Pork Chops wrote:
>>> Baxter <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in news:u5bmr6$32s86$4@dont-
>>> email.me:
>>>
>>>> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>>>>
>>>>> Lou Bricano wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes they do.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
>>>> magazine? Explain.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yk0uvoSWA2I
made-up rules.
If you wish to address me, scooter, you will do it in direct reply to
my posts; no piggybacking.
-Rudy, thinking he makes the rules
-Message-ID: <ZZacK.8$tTq...@fx34.iad>
Videos not allowed.
Imaginärer Gruppenleiter Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <atw5M.62534$qjm2....@fx09.iad>
<governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 21:16:57 -0700, Mike Colangelo <air@vatican_.con> wrote:
>
>>On 6/1/2023 8:28 PM, Pork Chops wrote:
>>> Baxter <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in news:u5bmr6$32s86$4@dont-
>>> email.me:
>>>
>>>> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>>>>
>>>>> Lou Bricano wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes they do.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
>>>> magazine? Explain.
>>>
>>
>>Videos not allowed.
>
>Says who?
"Cunt Flaps" Canoza thinks he runs things around here. He has lots of
>>Videos not allowed.
>
>Says who?
made-up rules.
If you wish to address me, scooter, you will do it in direct reply to
my posts; no piggybacking.
-Rudy, thinking he makes the rules
-Message-ID: <ZZacK.8$tTq...@fx34.iad>
Videos not allowed.
Imaginärer Gruppenleiter Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Message-ID: <atw5M.62534$qjm2....@fx09.iad>
Baxter
Jun 2, 2023, 10:22:22 PM6/2/23
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote in
news:plck7i9gd7pf1dvn0...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck
ing.dwarf.com:
Governor Swill
Jun 2, 2023, 11:39:14 PM6/2/23
to
On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:20:43 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>[Default] On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 14:07:17 -0400, Governor Swill
><governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>
>>On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:31:51 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>><klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:35 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>>>typed::
>>>
>>>>On 6/2/2023 6:11 AM, Scout typed:
>>>
>>>>> Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD capacity
>>>>> magazine
>>>>
>>>>For combat deployment, scooter. Not for civil disturbances, scooter.
>>>
>>>STILL awaiting your cite, "Cunt Flaps"
>>
>>Because yours was wrong.
>
>Yet "Cunt Flaps" Canoza has failed time and again to prove what he
>claims is true.
>
>Maybe you can help him.
I can point the gun at him, pull the trigger and count the recoils. Will that help?
>[Default] On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 14:07:17 -0400, Governor Swill
><governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>
>>On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:31:51 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>><klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:35 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>>>typed::
>>>
>>>>On 6/2/2023 6:11 AM, Scout typed:
>>>
>>>>> Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD capacity
>>>>> magazine
>>>>
>>>>For combat deployment, scooter. Not for civil disturbances, scooter.
>>>
>>>STILL awaiting your cite, "Cunt Flaps"
>>
>>Because yours was wrong.
>
>Yet "Cunt Flaps" Canoza has failed time and again to prove what he
>claims is true.
>
>Maybe you can help him.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 3, 2023, 7:49:36 AM6/3/23
to
[Default] On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 02:22:20 -0000 (UTC), Baxter
<bax02_s...@baxcode.com> typed:
You're too stupid to understand the difference, admitted pedophile
groomer Baxter.
<bax02_s...@baxcode.com> typed:
groomer Baxter.
Scout
Jun 5, 2023, 9:13:19 AM6/5/23
to
message
news:fr2k7iprsl4s05fam...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
Well, I will provide my cites, and Rudy can lie some more.
1)
https://www.businessinsider.com/national-guard-troops-states-protest-response-2020-5
2)
https://calmatters.org/justice/2020/06/california-national-guard-role-protests-explained/
3)
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/06/11/national-guard-troops-amid-protests-cost-nearly-25m-in-california/
4)
https://www.inquirer.com/news/pa-national-guard-activated-philadelphia-riots-20200602.html
5)
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/06/03/dozens-of-troops-sounded-off-on-the-use-of-the-military-to-help-quell-civil-unrest-this-is-what-they-said/
6)
https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/250-national-guard-troops-called-up-to-support-dc-police-as-verdict-looms-in-derek-chauvin-trial-1.670384
7)
http://www.juliascott.net/national-guard-troops-at-protests-what-does-it-mean-what-can-they-do/
8)
https://nypost.com/2020/06/07/national-guard-to-pull-out-of-la-as-protests-continue/
news:fr2k7iprsl4s05fam...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
1)
https://www.businessinsider.com/national-guard-troops-states-protest-response-2020-5
2)
https://calmatters.org/justice/2020/06/california-national-guard-role-protests-explained/
3)
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/06/11/national-guard-troops-amid-protests-cost-nearly-25m-in-california/
4)
https://www.inquirer.com/news/pa-national-guard-activated-philadelphia-riots-20200602.html
5)
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2020/06/03/dozens-of-troops-sounded-off-on-the-use-of-the-military-to-help-quell-civil-unrest-this-is-what-they-said/
6)
https://www.stripes.com/theaters/us/250-national-guard-troops-called-up-to-support-dc-police-as-verdict-looms-in-derek-chauvin-trial-1.670384
7)
http://www.juliascott.net/national-guard-troops-at-protests-what-does-it-mean-what-can-they-do/
8)
https://nypost.com/2020/06/07/national-guard-to-pull-out-of-la-as-protests-continue/
Scout
Jun 5, 2023, 9:13:20 AM6/5/23
to
news:2edl7i5c7neno7h6p...@4ax.com...
Rudy counting 1.. 2.. Many...
> On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:20:43 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
> <klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 14:07:17 -0400, Governor Swill
>><governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>>
>>>On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:31:51 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>><klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:35 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>>>>typed::
>>>>
>>>>>On 6/2/2023 6:11 AM, Scout typed:
>>>>
>>>>>> Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD
>>>>>> capacity
>>>>>> magazine
>>>>>
>>>>>For combat deployment, scooter. Not for civil disturbances, scooter.
>>>>
>>>>STILL awaiting your cite, "Cunt Flaps"
>>>
>>>Because yours was wrong.
>>
>>Yet "Cunt Flaps" Canoza has failed time and again to prove what he
>>claims is true.
>>
>>Maybe you can help him.
>
> I can point the gun at him, pull the trigger and count the recoils. Will
> that help?
>
> Swill
Probably not.. Rudy can't count above 2.
> <klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>[Default] On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 14:07:17 -0400, Governor Swill
>><governo...@gmail.com> typed:
>>
>>>On Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:31:51 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>><klaus.schadenfreude.löschen.@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>[Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:35 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>>>>typed::
>>>>
>>>>>On 6/2/2023 6:11 AM, Scout typed:
>>>>
>>>>>> Not so fast.. He could be saying that 20 rounds is the STANDARD
>>>>>> capacity
>>>>>> magazine
>>>>>
>>>>>For combat deployment, scooter. Not for civil disturbances, scooter.
>>>>
>>>>STILL awaiting your cite, "Cunt Flaps"
>>>
>>>Because yours was wrong.
>>
>>Yet "Cunt Flaps" Canoza has failed time and again to prove what he
>>claims is true.
>>
>>Maybe you can help him.
>
> I can point the gun at him, pull the trigger and count the recoils. Will
> that help?
>
> Swill
Rudy counting 1.. 2.. Many...
Scout
Jun 5, 2023, 9:13:21 AM6/5/23
to
news:eo2k7idqe4pof8ing...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
And the Constitution explicitly states they have no such implied power to
regulate guns or magazines.
regulate guns or magazines.
Scout
Jun 5, 2023, 9:13:23 AM6/5/23
to
news:2s2k7i9bq1h0fkagm...@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
possibly say there is no lawful purpose for a 30 round magazine.
I would simply note the military issues 30 round magazines... is Rudy
claiming our soldiers are acting in violation of the law when in possession
of such a magazine?
> [Default] On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:50:34 -0700, "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
> typed:
>
>>On 6/2/2023 6:15 AM, scooter lied:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Baxter" <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>> news:u5bmr6$32s86$4...@dont-email.me...
>>>> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>>>>
>>>>> "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed::
>>>>
>>>>>> No. *No one* has a legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round magazine.
> typed:
>
>>On 6/2/2023 6:15 AM, scooter lied:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Baxter" <bax02_s...@baxcode.com> wrote in message
>>> news:u5bmr6$32s86$4...@dont-email.me...
>>>> Anonymous <an...@anon.net> wrote in news:u5bi6u$1fffu$1...@news.mixmin.net:
>>>>
>>>>> "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed::
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes they do.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
>>>> magazine? Explain.
>>>
>>> I want it.
>>
>>You don't have a right to it, scooter. And you have no lawful purpose for
>>it.
>
> "Cunt Flaps" can't define "lawful purpose.
Heck, he doesn't even know what lawful purposes guns have so how can he
>>>>> Yes they do.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh, really?!! Just what is that legitimate, lawful need for a 30 round
>>>> magazine? Explain.
>>>
>>> I want it.
>>
>>You don't have a right to it, scooter. And you have no lawful purpose for
>>it.
>
> "Cunt Flaps" can't define "lawful purpose.
possibly say there is no lawful purpose for a 30 round magazine.
I would simply note the military issues 30 round magazines... is Rudy
claiming our soldiers are acting in violation of the law when in possession
of such a magazine?
Klaus Schadenfreude
Jun 5, 2023, 10:08:43 AM6/5/23
to
[Default] On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 07:31:35 -0500, "Scout"
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
Since I posted my photos "Cunt Flaps" has been pretty quiet on the
issue. LOL
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:
issue. LOL
0 new messages