Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
5-YEAR-OLD "given rifle as a gift"
3 views
Skip to first unread message
ConsƦcons
May 1, 2013, 4:18:51 PM5/1/13
to
Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
_______________________________________
(AFP) - 1 hour ago
US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
CHICAGO — A five-year-old boy who was playing with a .22 caliber rifle
he'd been given as a gift accidentally shot and killed his little sister
in their Kentucky home, officials said.
The shooting happened Tuesday in rural Cumberland county and the
two-year-old girl was rushed to a hospital where she was pronounced
dead, the state police said.
Cumberland County Coroner Gary White identified the girl as Caroline
Starks and said the children's mother was cleaning the house at the time
and had stepped outside onto the porch.
"She said no more than three minutes had went by and she actually heard
the rifle go off. She ran back in and found the little girl," White told
WKYT news.
The rifle had been given to the boy last year and was kept in the corner
of a room. The parents didn't realize a shell had been left in it.
"It's a Crickett," he told the Lexington Herald-Leader. "It's a little
rifle for a kid. ...The little boy's used to shooting the little gun."
An autopsy was set to be conducted on Wednesday, but White said he
expects the shooting will be ruled accidental.
"Just one of those crazy accidents," White said.
There were 851 deaths caused by accidental discharges of firearms in the
United States in 2011, according to the latest data from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
A further 14,675 people were injured by accidental discharges of
firearms in 2011, of whom 7,991 were under the age of 18 and 3,569 were
under the age of 13.
The United States has been embroiled in a heated debate over gun control
and gun culture in the wake of a horrific December shooting at a school
in Newtown, Connecticut that killed 26 young children and educators.
President Barack Obama has pushed for tougher federal gun laws to
require universal background checks on gun buyers and called for a ban
on assault weapons like the one used in Newtown.
But last month, his background check proposal -- condemned by the
powerful National Rifle Association as an infringement on Americans'
constitutional right "to keep and bear arms" -- failed to muster the
necessary 60 votes needed to clear the US Senate.
No efforts have been made to prevent children from using firearms for
hunting and sporting purposes, a treasured tradition for many American
families.
The Crickett is just one of many child-sized rifles on the market and is
sold with the tag line 'My First Rifle.'
It comes in a number of child-friendly barrel designs and colors,
including hot pink for little girls. A host of accessories are also
available, like story books and a gun-toting beanie baby of the rifle's
mascot, a cartoonish cricket.
_______________________________________
(AFP) - 1 hour ago
US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
CHICAGO — A five-year-old boy who was playing with a .22 caliber rifle
he'd been given as a gift accidentally shot and killed his little sister
in their Kentucky home, officials said.
The shooting happened Tuesday in rural Cumberland county and the
two-year-old girl was rushed to a hospital where she was pronounced
dead, the state police said.
Cumberland County Coroner Gary White identified the girl as Caroline
Starks and said the children's mother was cleaning the house at the time
and had stepped outside onto the porch.
"She said no more than three minutes had went by and she actually heard
the rifle go off. She ran back in and found the little girl," White told
WKYT news.
The rifle had been given to the boy last year and was kept in the corner
of a room. The parents didn't realize a shell had been left in it.
"It's a Crickett," he told the Lexington Herald-Leader. "It's a little
rifle for a kid. ...The little boy's used to shooting the little gun."
An autopsy was set to be conducted on Wednesday, but White said he
expects the shooting will be ruled accidental.
"Just one of those crazy accidents," White said.
There were 851 deaths caused by accidental discharges of firearms in the
United States in 2011, according to the latest data from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
A further 14,675 people were injured by accidental discharges of
firearms in 2011, of whom 7,991 were under the age of 18 and 3,569 were
under the age of 13.
The United States has been embroiled in a heated debate over gun control
and gun culture in the wake of a horrific December shooting at a school
in Newtown, Connecticut that killed 26 young children and educators.
President Barack Obama has pushed for tougher federal gun laws to
require universal background checks on gun buyers and called for a ban
on assault weapons like the one used in Newtown.
But last month, his background check proposal -- condemned by the
powerful National Rifle Association as an infringement on Americans'
constitutional right "to keep and bear arms" -- failed to muster the
necessary 60 votes needed to clear the US Senate.
No efforts have been made to prevent children from using firearms for
hunting and sporting purposes, a treasured tradition for many American
families.
The Crickett is just one of many child-sized rifles on the market and is
sold with the tag line 'My First Rifle.'
It comes in a number of child-friendly barrel designs and colors,
including hot pink for little girls. A host of accessories are also
available, like story books and a gun-toting beanie baby of the rifle's
mascot, a cartoonish cricket.
Too_Many_Tools
May 1, 2013, 8:37:44 PM5/1/13
to
to be tried for manslaughter.
And please let me be on the jury.
TMT
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 1, 2013, 8:40:50 PM5/1/13
to
On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRc�n...@cda.ca>
wrote:
>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
How do you know there was no background check?
wrote:
>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 2, 2013, 2:35:39 AM5/2/13
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01 May 2013
05:40:50p
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal gun
safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot be made
to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods, incest-bred
set of male and female of the species existing there gave a weapon to some
ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who managed to spatter the
brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal container.
Where was it presented in the story that BOTH the male and female pretending
to be father and mother were arrested for felony bad parenting and the
remaining children taken away and put into homes run by responsible
individuals??? That happens in DEVELOPED, CIVILIZED NATIONS.
But of course, this is Kentucky, a province of Dumfukistan.
Get indignant about that, gun fondling, right-wing filth!
--
The Enraged Apostate
Right-wing talking points show a popular appeal in
the same way that trainwrecks are morbidly fascinating.
But soon after the desire to be horrified at the spectacle passes,
the realization soon follows that it is all an ugly, bloody mess,
and it will only be cleaned up with leftist methods and a liberal in charge.
05:40:50p
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
> wrote:
>
>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>
>
> How do you know there was no background check?
Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>
>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>
>
> How do you know there was no background check?
which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal gun
safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot be made
to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods, incest-bred
set of male and female of the species existing there gave a weapon to some
ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who managed to spatter the
brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal container.
Where was it presented in the story that BOTH the male and female pretending
to be father and mother were arrested for felony bad parenting and the
remaining children taken away and put into homes run by responsible
individuals??? That happens in DEVELOPED, CIVILIZED NATIONS.
But of course, this is Kentucky, a province of Dumfukistan.
Get indignant about that, gun fondling, right-wing filth!
--
The Enraged Apostate
Right-wing talking points show a popular appeal in
the same way that trainwrecks are morbidly fascinating.
But soon after the desire to be horrified at the spectacle passes,
the realization soon follows that it is all an ugly, bloody mess,
and it will only be cleaned up with leftist methods and a liberal in charge.
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 8:29:14 AM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01 May 2013
>05:40:50p
>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>
>>
>> How do you know there was no background check?
>
>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
>insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal gun
>safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot be made
>to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods, incest-bred
>set of male and female of the species existing there gave a weapon to some
>ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who managed to spatter the
>brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal container.
In other words, you're agreeing with me that it was a lie. Gotcha.
Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01 May 2013
>05:40:50p
>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>
>>
>> How do you know there was no background check?
>
>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
>insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal gun
>safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot be made
>to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods, incest-bred
>set of male and female of the species existing there gave a weapon to some
>ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who managed to spatter the
>brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal container.
deep
May 2, 2013, 9:11:59 AM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01 May 2013
>05:40:50p
>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>
>>
>> How do you know there was no background check?
>
>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
>insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal gun
>safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot be made
>to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods, incest-bred
>set of male and female of the species existing there gave a weapon to some
>ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who managed to spatter the
>brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal container.
>
Darwin called that natural selection.
>05:40:50p
>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>
>>
>> How do you know there was no background check?
>
>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
>insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal gun
>safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot be made
>to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods, incest-bred
>set of male and female of the species existing there gave a weapon to some
>ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who managed to spatter the
>brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal container.
>
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 2, 2013, 9:40:59 AM5/2/13
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
2013 05:29:14a
> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01 May
>>2013 05:40:50p
>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRc�n...@cda.ca>
pretense at gun safety which itself was buried under a right-wing pile of
excrement, proving the attitude that no background checks are needed.
Do they get something called "the Internet" in Dumfukistan where you
maintain a single-wide sty in all probability?
2013 05:29:14a
> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01 May
>>2013 05:40:50p
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> How do you know there was no background check?
>>
>>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>>which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
>>insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal
>>gun safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot
>>be made to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods,
>>incest-bred set of male and female of the species existing there gave a
>>weapon to some ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who
>>managed to spatter the brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal
>>container.
>
> In other words, you're agreeing with me that it was a lie.
Look up something called the "Manchin-Toomey bill," itself a ludicrous
>>>
>>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> How do you know there was no background check?
>>
>>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>>which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
>>insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal
>>gun safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot
>>be made to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods,
>>incest-bred set of male and female of the species existing there gave a
>>weapon to some ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who
>>managed to spatter the brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal
>>container.
>
> In other words, you're agreeing with me that it was a lie.
pretense at gun safety which itself was buried under a right-wing pile of
excrement, proving the attitude that no background checks are needed.
Do they get something called "the Internet" in Dumfukistan where you
maintain a single-wide sty in all probability?
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 10:00:42 AM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 2 May 2013 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Prostate, World
any proof.
Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>2013 05:29:14a
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01 May
>>>2013 05:40:50p
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>2013 05:29:14a
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01 May
>>>2013 05:40:50p
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How do you know there was no background check?
>>>
>>>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>>>which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
>>>insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal
>>>gun safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot
>>>be made to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods,
>>>incest-bred set of male and female of the species existing there gave a
>>>weapon to some ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who
>>>managed to spatter the brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal
>>>container.
>>
>> In other words, you're agreeing with me that it was a lie.
>
>Look up something called the "Manchin-Toomey bill,"
Look up where the OP was shrieking about "no background check" without
>>>>
>>>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How do you know there was no background check?
>>>
>>>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>>>which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
>>>insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal
>>>gun safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot
>>>be made to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods,
>>>incest-bred set of male and female of the species existing there gave a
>>>weapon to some ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who
>>>managed to spatter the brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal
>>>container.
>>
>> In other words, you're agreeing with me that it was a lie.
>
>Look up something called the "Manchin-Toomey bill,"
any proof.
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 10:01:07 AM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 02 May 2013 07:11:59 -0600, deep wrote:
>On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01 May 2013
>>05:40:50p
>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> How do you know there was no background check?
>>
>>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>>which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
>>insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal gun
>>safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot be made
>>to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods, incest-bred
>>set of male and female of the species existing there gave a weapon to some
>>ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who managed to spatter the
>>brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal container.
>>
>Darwin called that natural selection.
How do you explain your continued presence?
>On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01 May 2013
>>05:40:50p
>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>>
>>>
>>> How do you know there was no background check?
>>
>>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province of
>>which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the utterly
>>insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting any federal gun
>>safety law passed (yes, NO background checks needed!)----and cannot be made
>>to focus on what is shockingly deplorable: that some backwoods, incest-bred
>>set of male and female of the species existing there gave a weapon to some
>>ADHD-afflicted ankle biter they crapped out and who managed to spatter the
>>brain and blood of a sibling out of its corporeal container.
>>
>Darwin called that natural selection.
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 2, 2013, 11:13:07 AM5/2/13
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May 2013
07:00:42a
It is about parents who should be arrested. That has been made clear to
you. The OP's text is something like a pre-sig.
2. The proof about the no-background-checks lunacy was offered to you
nonetheless.
3. Whatever the OP was doing, the word "shrieking" is a term not at all
descriptive.
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 2, 2013, 11:15:15 AM5/2/13
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
2013 07:01:07a
meter.
deep
May 2, 2013, 11:24:23 AM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks lunacy.
>It is about parents who should be arrested.
On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks lunacy.
>It is about parents who should be arrested.
children from bad parents whenever possible. But on the other hand I
can't help but think that if Dumbfuck right wing trailer trash wants
to let their retarded children kill each other off, why the hell not?
All hail Darwin!
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 11:25:55 AM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
It is now, since that's the ONLY part of the message I was addressing.
If I wanted to talk to you simpletons about the rest of it, I'd have
quoted it in my reply.
I didn't.
See how usenet works?
If I wanted to talk to you simpletons about the rest of it, I'd have
quoted it in my reply.
I didn't.
See how usenet works?
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 11:26:52 AM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:15:15 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
Only because you're stupid and hooked up your meter backwards.
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 11:29:14 AM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 02 May 2013 09:24:23 -0600, deep wrote:
>On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>
>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks lunacy.
>>It is about parents who should be arrested.
>
>On one hand, of course, the moral high ground [..]
>On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>
>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks lunacy.
>>It is about parents who should be arrested.
>
What would you know about the moral high ground?
deep
May 2, 2013, 11:30:22 AM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:15:15 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
Klaus has blown up my irony meter so many times I usually don't bother
responding to him any more.
responding to him any more.
RD Sandman
May 2, 2013, 1:47:10 PM5/2/13
to
"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B4448BAF...@78.46.70.116:
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
> 2013 05:29:14a
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01
>>>May 2013 05:40:50p
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
> Do they get something called "the Internet" in Dumfukistan where you
> maintain a single-wide sty in all probability?
>
>
--
Sleep well, tonight.....
RD (The Sandman
You can be young without money, but you
can't be old without it.
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B4448BAF...@78.46.70.116:
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
> 2013 05:29:14a
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01
>>>May 2013 05:40:50p
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How do you know there was no background check?
>>>
>>>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province
>>>of which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the
>>>utterly insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting
>>>any federal gun safety law passed (yes, NO background checks
>>>needed!)----and cannot be made to focus on what is shockingly
>>>deplorable: that some backwoods, incest-bred set of male and female
>>>of the species existing there gave a weapon to some ADHD-afflicted
>>>ankle biter they crapped out and who managed to spatter the brain and
>>>blood of a sibling out of its corporeal container.
>>
>> In other words, you're agreeing with me that it was a lie.
>
> Look up something called the "Manchin-Toomey bill," itself a ludicrous
> pretense at gun safety which itself was buried under a right-wing
> pile of excrement, proving the attitude that no background checks are
> needed.
Do you always type so fast that you leave out words like "additional"?
>>>>
>>>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How do you know there was no background check?
>>>
>>>Of course, you apparently being a native of Dumfukistan---a province
>>>of which where this "accident" happened---you give priority to the
>>>utterly insignificant---a comment about the state of mind on getting
>>>any federal gun safety law passed (yes, NO background checks
>>>needed!)----and cannot be made to focus on what is shockingly
>>>deplorable: that some backwoods, incest-bred set of male and female
>>>of the species existing there gave a weapon to some ADHD-afflicted
>>>ankle biter they crapped out and who managed to spatter the brain and
>>>blood of a sibling out of its corporeal container.
>>
>> In other words, you're agreeing with me that it was a lie.
>
> Look up something called the "Manchin-Toomey bill," itself a ludicrous
> pretense at gun safety which itself was buried under a right-wing
> pile of excrement, proving the attitude that no background checks are
> needed.
> Do they get something called "the Internet" in Dumfukistan where you
> maintain a single-wide sty in all probability?
>
>
--
RD (The Sandman
You can be young without money, but you
can't be old without it.
RD Sandman
May 2, 2013, 1:48:58 PM5/2/13
to
"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B4542B44...@78.46.70.116:
It was unitl your pissed off prostate came in here.
The OP's text is something like a pre-sig.
>
> 2. The proof about the no-background-checks lunacy was offered to you
> nonetheless.
Damn, there you go again....leaving out the word "additional". Is that a
common trait with you?
> 3. Whatever the OP was doing, the word "shrieking" is a term not at
> all descriptive.
>
>
--
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B4542B44...@78.46.70.116:
The OP's text is something like a pre-sig.
>
> 2. The proof about the no-background-checks lunacy was offered to you
> nonetheless.
common trait with you?
> 3. Whatever the OP was doing, the word "shrieking" is a term not at
> all descriptive.
>
>
--
RD Sandman
May 2, 2013, 1:49:48 PM5/2/13
to
deep wrote in news:h315o855d9jcioe8s...@4ax.com:
Too bad your folks didn't believe in that philosphy.
Wayne
May 2, 2013, 2:14:28 PM5/2/13
to
"ConsƦcons" wrote in message news:0Ffgt.10044$MS1....@newsfe05.iad...
>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
rifle?
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 2, 2013, 3:09:30 PM5/2/13
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
2013 08:25:55a
moral priorities. See how the Usenet works, simpleton?
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 3:15:25 PM5/2/13
to
http://klaus.webege.com/dudu/dudu.htm
Deep Dudu's FORTRESS OF LIES
Now With Over 350 Documented
Lies, Falsehoods, Fabrications, Distortions, and Deceptions!
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 3:23:51 PM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 2 May 2013 19:09:30 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
Yep. I reply to a message, and you- being the bumbling idiot that you
are- start yammering about something else entirely.
Usenet is full of left-wing simpletons who can't manage a cognizant
reply. But that's how usenet works.
Oh, and by the way, thanks for helping to establish the FACT that the
OP was lying when they claimed there was no background check, since
they didn't know, and haven't bothered to provide any proof.
Typical leftist bullshit.
are- start yammering about something else entirely.
Usenet is full of left-wing simpletons who can't manage a cognizant
reply. But that's how usenet works.
Oh, and by the way, thanks for helping to establish the FACT that the
OP was lying when they claimed there was no background check, since
they didn't know, and haven't bothered to provide any proof.
Typical leftist bullshit.
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 2, 2013, 3:52:48 PM5/2/13
to
The gun fondling misanthrope Kluelouse showed us just what kind of sick shit
he is into by posting the following:
> http://klaus.webege.com/dudu/dudu.htm
> Deep Dudu's FORTRESS OF LIES
> Now With Over 350 Documented
> Lies, Falsehoods, Fabrications, Distortions, and Deceptions!
--
The Enraged Apostate
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 2, 2013, 4:30:23 PM5/2/13
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May 2013
12:23:51p
> On Thu, 2 May 2013 19:09:30 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>>2013 08:25:55a
>>
>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>>>>2013 07:00:42a
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Prostate, World
>>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>>>>>>2013 05:29:14a
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>>>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01
>>>>>>>>May 2013 05:40:50p
>>>>>>>>
Kluelouse---bumbling idiot that he is---signals he's changing the subject!
> thanks for helping to establish the FACT that the
> OP was lying when they claimed there was no background check, since
> they didn't know, and haven't bothered to provide any proof.
as the OP's, that puts you indisputably beyond the bumbling idiot class,
But continue to rant and rave on this matter in an unending series of posts.
Obsession about these matters is a distinguishing ignominious characteristic
of yours.
_ G O D _
May 2, 2013, 5:46:51 PM5/2/13
to
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote
news:XnsA1B46E367...@216.196.121.131...
and even were able to pass it on to him. - May be,
this is how he was able to survive in order to pass
their philosophy on his descendants and even you....
--
_____________________________________________________
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
news:XnsA1B46E367...@216.196.121.131...
> deep wrote in news:h315o855d9jcioe8s...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks
>>>lunacy. It is about parents who should be arrested.
>>
>> On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
>> children from bad parents whenever possible. But on the other hand I
>> can't help but think that if Dumbfuck right wing trailer trash wants
>> to let their retarded children kill each other off, why the hell not?
>
> Too bad your folks didn't believe in that philosphy.
>
Or maybe they indeed believed in this philosophy,
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks
>>>lunacy. It is about parents who should be arrested.
>>
>> On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
>> children from bad parents whenever possible. But on the other hand I
>> can't help but think that if Dumbfuck right wing trailer trash wants
>> to let their retarded children kill each other off, why the hell not?
>
> Too bad your folks didn't believe in that philosphy.
>
and even were able to pass it on to him. - May be,
this is how he was able to survive in order to pass
their philosophy on his descendants and even you....
--
_____________________________________________________
http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
Scout
May 2, 2013, 5:47:04 PM5/2/13
to
"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid>
priorities....
Scout
May 2, 2013, 5:48:33 PM5/2/13
to
"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid>
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
> 2013
> 12:23:51p
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 19:09:30 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>>>2013 08:25:55a
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>>>>>2013 07:00:42a
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Prostate, World
>>>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02
>>>>>>>May
>>>>>>>2013 05:29:14a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>>>>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01
>>>>>>>>>May 2013 05:40:50p
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRcén...@cda.ca>
> 2013
> 12:23:51p
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 19:09:30 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>>>2013 08:25:55a
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>>>>>2013 07:00:42a
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Prostate, World
>>>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02
>>>>>>>May
>>>>>>>2013 05:29:14a
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>>>>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01
>>>>>>>>>May 2013 05:40:50p
>>>>>>>>>
Scout
May 2, 2013, 5:48:57 PM5/2/13
to
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:rh15o8l82rn82snmu...@4ax.com...
Scout
May 2, 2013, 5:50:35 PM5/2/13
to
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA1B46E367...@216.196.121.131...
> deep wrote in news:h315o855d9jcioe8s...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks
>>>lunacy. It is about parents who should be arrested.
>>
>> On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
>> children from bad parents whenever possible.
So when were your children taken away from you?
>
>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks
>>>lunacy. It is about parents who should be arrested.
>>
>> On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
>> children from bad parents whenever possible.
SaPeIsMa
May 2, 2013, 5:59:55 PM5/2/13
to
"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message news:0Ffgt.10044$MS1....@newsfe05.iad...
You are responding to Karen Gordon, an idiot of incredible stature on
Canadian Groups.
She also changes nyms more often than she changes tampons.
news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message news:0Ffgt.10044$MS1....@newsfe05.iad...
>
>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>
> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally own
> a rifle?
>
>
Well yeah
>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>
> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally own
> a rifle?
>
>
You are responding to Karen Gordon, an idiot of incredible stature on
Canadian Groups.
She also changes nyms more often than she changes tampons.
RD Sandman
May 2, 2013, 6:31:09 PM5/2/13
to
"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
Legally own, yes......legally buy, no.
news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
RD Sandman
May 2, 2013, 6:31:57 PM5/2/13
to
"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B47C3E58...@78.46.70.116:
You lose. Threads drift.
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B47C3E58...@78.46.70.116:
Wayne
May 2, 2013, 8:27:53 PM5/2/13
to
"RD Sandman" wrote in message
news:XnsA1B49DE9D...@216.196.121.131...
"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>
> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message
> news:0Ffgt.10044$MS1....@newsfe05.iad...
>
>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>
> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally
> own a rifle?
Another one of those legal things. Here in CA, a 5 year old can't "own" a
gun.
Kentucky seems to have no lower age limit to "own".
The Brady Act prohibits persons under 18 from owning a long gun (except in
VT...16).
So...YMMV
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 8:54:59 PM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 2 May 2013 20:30:23 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
[crickets.wav]
>> thanks for helping to establish the FACT that the
>> OP was lying when they claimed there was no background check, since
>> they didn't know, and haven't bothered to provide any proof.
>
>When you indicate that you don't know how to comprehend a Usenet post such
>as the OP'[..]
"Your reading compression sucks."
� mrLookout, Tue, March 22, 2011
[chuckle]
Maybe you should go back to AOL until you've learned how usenet works,
eh?
>
>
>
>> Oh, and by the way,
>
>LOLOLOLOLOL
>
>Kluelouse---bumbling idiot that he is---signals he's changing the subject!
Poor Enlarged Prostate has such a short attention span......
>
>
>> Oh, and by the way,
>
>LOLOLOLOLOL
>
>Kluelouse---bumbling idiot that he is---signals he's changing the subject!
>> thanks for helping to establish the FACT that the
>> OP was lying when they claimed there was no background check, since
>> they didn't know, and haven't bothered to provide any proof.
>
>When you indicate that you don't know how to comprehend a Usenet post such
"Your reading compression sucks."
� mrLookout, Tue, March 22, 2011
[chuckle]
Maybe you should go back to AOL until you've learned how usenet works,
eh?
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 8:55:49 PM5/2/13
to
On Thu, 02 May 2013 17:31:57 -0500, RD Sandman
<rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
><Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
>news:XnsA1B47C3E58...@78.46.70.116:
>
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>> 2013 08:25:55a
>>
>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>>>>2013 07:00:42a
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Prostate, World
>>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02
>May
>>>>>>2013 05:29:14a
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>>>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01
>>>>>>>>May 2013 05:40:50p
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:18:51 -0700, Cons?cons <ConsRc�n...@cda.ca>
<rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote:
>"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
><Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
>news:XnsA1B47C3E58...@78.46.70.116:
>
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>> 2013 08:25:55a
>>
>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02 May
>>>>2013 07:00:42a
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Prostate, World
>>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Thu 02
>May
>>>>>>2013 05:29:14a
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, 2 May 2013 06:35:39 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>>>>>> Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Wed 01
>>>>>>>>May 2013 05:40:50p
>>>>>>>>
snipped the rest so he wouldn't be confused.
It wasn't enough.
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 2, 2013, 8:56:50 PM5/2/13
to
Can we make a list of the shit you DO know? It's gonna be a lot less
paper.
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 2, 2013, 10:26:37 PM5/2/13
to
deep wrote on Thu 02 May 2013 08:30:22a
The utterly juvenile obsession Kluelouse has in stalking you in the apparent
need to psychopathologically record your posts would be another reason to
ignore this loser.
--
The Enraged Apostate
need to psychopathologically record your posts would be another reason to
ignore this loser.
--
The Enraged Apostate
RD Sandman
May 3, 2013, 12:23:56 AM5/3/13
to
"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
news:klv040$1j7$1...@dont-email.me:
Federal law sets the ages at 18 to purchase a long gun (rifle or shotgun)
and 21 for a handgun. You are correct in that a state may have its own
laws on age, but your statement about only in Vermont is incorrect.
Arizona, for example, also says 18 for a long gun and 21 for a handgun.
I believe that is also true for California. You may own one if it was
purchased by a legal purchaser like your parent, but you cannot buy one
yourself until you reach those ages listed above.
news:klv040$1j7$1...@dont-email.me:
and 21 for a handgun. You are correct in that a state may have its own
laws on age, but your statement about only in Vermont is incorrect.
Arizona, for example, also says 18 for a long gun and 21 for a handgun.
I believe that is also true for California. You may own one if it was
purchased by a legal purchaser like your parent, but you cannot buy one
yourself until you reach those ages listed above.
RD Sandman
May 3, 2013, 12:25:17 AM5/3/13
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:qn26o8htm48gbgdgo...@4ax.com:
GOP_Decline_and_Fall
May 3, 2013, 3:09:58 AM5/3/13
to
On Thu, 02 May 2013 09:24:23 -0600, deep wrote:
>On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>
>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks lunacy.
>Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>
>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks lunacy.
>>It is about parents who should be arrested.
>
>On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
>
>On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
>children from bad parents whenever possible. But on the other hand I
>can't help but think that if Dumbfuck right wing trailer trash wants
>to let their retarded children kill each other off, why the hell not?
>
>All hail Darwin!
>can't help but think that if Dumbfuck right wing trailer trash wants
>to let their retarded children kill each other off, why the hell not?
>
A two year old child is NOT "right wing trailer trash"
That a company is allowed to manufacture and market deadly weapons to
children and parents give then as gifts to pre-schoolers is what has
the rest of the world reeling in horror in this tale.
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 3, 2013, 8:51:55 AM5/3/13
to
you and a handful of screeching liberals.
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 3, 2013, 8:53:49 AM5/3/13
to
On Fri, 3 May 2013 02:26:37 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>The utterly juvenile obsession Kluelouse has in stalking you [..]
Poor Enlarged Prostate. His Leftist Dictionary doesn't give the
correct definition of "stalking."
Hey, since stalking IS illegal in most places, maybe you should have
me arrested, huh?
[chuckle]
Poor Enlarged Prostate. His Leftist Dictionary doesn't give the
correct definition of "stalking."
Hey, since stalking IS illegal in most places, maybe you should have
me arrested, huh?
[chuckle]
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 3, 2013, 10:33:58 AM5/3/13
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Fri 03 May
2013 05:51:55a
Yes, I would agree that you and your inbred clan of gun fondling filthy
right wingers = "nobody". But your numbers are---what?---a couple of
hundred backwoods incestuous dumfuks.
As the poster said, Kluelouse, 99.53% of the world population----including a
large fraction of the 50 million paranoids called U.S. gun owners who are
askeered of the gubbamint takin' they'a guns (sic) but still don't believe
toddlers should be PLAYING WITH REAL GUNS----is aghast that parents would
even think to give a toddler a gun, let alone actually do so.
2013 05:51:55a
right wingers = "nobody". But your numbers are---what?---a couple of
hundred backwoods incestuous dumfuks.
As the poster said, Kluelouse, 99.53% of the world population----including a
large fraction of the 50 million paranoids called U.S. gun owners who are
askeered of the gubbamint takin' they'a guns (sic) but still don't believe
toddlers should be PLAYING WITH REAL GUNS----is aghast that parents would
even think to give a toddler a gun, let alone actually do so.
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 3, 2013, 10:50:53 AM5/3/13
to
On Fri, 3 May 2013 14:33:58 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
[chuckle]
>
>As the poster said, Kluelouse, 99.53% of the world population-
Now it's up to 99.53%?
LOL
>---including a
>large fraction of the 50 million paranoids called U.S. gun owners who are
>askeered of the gubbamint takin' they'a guns (sic) but still don't believe
>toddlers should be PLAYING WITH REAL GUNS----is aghast that parents would
>even think to give a toddler a gun, let alone actually do so.
Nobody is giving toddlers guns. As usual, leftists don't know the
meaning of words that they [try to] use.
Smaller guns meant to "fit" a child are good things. It allows them to
learn about guns--- something you freaks haven't been able to do. To
wit:
"You know that these [assault] weapons can shoot down airplanes, they
can blow up railroads. "
-Gun Expert Rev. Jesse Jackson.
"I've seen the bullets that implode. In Sandy Hook, youngsters were
dismembered. "
-Gun expert Dianne Feinstein
"I'm not a sixth grader..."
-Gun expert Dianne Feinstein
"Well, you know, my shotgun will do better for you than your AR-15,
because you want to keep someone away from your house, just fire the
shotgun through the door."
-Gun expert Joe Biden
Congressman Giffords' life was saved and so many others' when
very valiant folks stood up to defend themselves and protect
themselves,
and they did it with ballpoint pens."
-Self Defense Expert Colorado State Sen. Jessie Ulibar
"Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?
#PrayForNewton"
-Houston Democrat Precinct Chair John Cobarruvias
"I said, 'Jill, if there's ever a problem, just walk out on the
balcony here, walk out and
put that double-barrel shotgun and fire two blasts outside the
house.'"
-Gun expert Joe Biden
"There is no hunter that needs automatic military weapons to enjoy the
culture of going hunting, We're talking about millions of kids dying
-- being shot down by assault weapons."
- Crime Expert Charlie Rangel
"I think a lot of senators did not understand that if Florida gives
someone a concealed-carry permit and they have a criminal record a
mile long, you've got to let them carry in your state." Rand said.
-Kristen Rand
Violence Policy Center
Legislative Director
"I will tell you these are ammunition -- bullets -- so the people who
have those now they are going to shoot them, and so if you ban -- if
you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity
magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the
bullets will have been shot and there won't be any more available,"
she said.
A spokeswoman issued a statement to the Denver Post, which had flagged
the comment as inaccurate, explaining that the congresswoman who has
worked on a high-capacity magazine ban for years "simply misspoke" --
"she should have referred to 'clips,' which cannot be reused because
they don't have a feeding mechanism."
-Firearms Expert Rep. Diana DeGette (D)
Q: Do you know what a barrel shroud is?
A: I actually don't know what a barrel shroud is.... I believe it is a
shoulder thing that goes up.
-Firearms Expert Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY)
"For target shooting, that's okay. Get a license and go to the range.
For defense of the home, that's why we have police departments."
-Former Reagan White House Press Sec. James Brady
speaking on the right to bear arms."
Don't condemn the gangbangers, they've got guns that are trafficked --
that are not enforced, that are straw purchased and they come into
places even that have strong gun laws."
- Crime Expert Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas)
"2nd Amendment must go. Violence has 2 stop."
-Jay Mohr Twitter reaction to Boston marathon bomb.
Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Fri 03 May
>2013 05:51:55a
>
>> On Fri, 03 May 2013 00:09:58 -0700, GOP_Decline_and_Fall
>> <D...@null.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 02 May 2013 09:24:23 -0600, deep wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>>>Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks
>>>>>lunacy. It is about parents who should be arrested.
>>>>
>>>>On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
>>>>children from bad parents whenever possible. But on the other hand I
>>>>can't help but think that if Dumbfuck right wing trailer trash wants
>>>>to let their retarded children kill each other off, why the hell not?
>>>>
>>>>All hail Darwin!
>>>
>>>A two year old child is NOT "right wing trailer trash"
>>>
>>>That a company is allowed to manufacture and market deadly weapons to
>>>children and parents give then as gifts to pre-schoolers is what has
>>>the rest of the world reeling in horror in this tale.
>>
>> Nobody is "reeling in horror" about smaller guns for children. Just
>> you and a handful of screeching liberals.
>
>Yes, I would agree that you and your inbred clan of gun fondling filthy
>right wingers = "nobody". But your numbers are---what?---a couple of
>hundred backwoods incestuous dumfuks.
We managed to defeat your "90%" though, didn't we?
>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Fri 03 May
>2013 05:51:55a
>
>> On Fri, 03 May 2013 00:09:58 -0700, GOP_Decline_and_Fall
>> <D...@null.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 02 May 2013 09:24:23 -0600, deep wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>>>Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks
>>>>>lunacy. It is about parents who should be arrested.
>>>>
>>>>On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
>>>>children from bad parents whenever possible. But on the other hand I
>>>>can't help but think that if Dumbfuck right wing trailer trash wants
>>>>to let their retarded children kill each other off, why the hell not?
>>>>
>>>>All hail Darwin!
>>>
>>>A two year old child is NOT "right wing trailer trash"
>>>
>>>That a company is allowed to manufacture and market deadly weapons to
>>>children and parents give then as gifts to pre-schoolers is what has
>>>the rest of the world reeling in horror in this tale.
>>
>> Nobody is "reeling in horror" about smaller guns for children. Just
>> you and a handful of screeching liberals.
>
>Yes, I would agree that you and your inbred clan of gun fondling filthy
>right wingers = "nobody". But your numbers are---what?---a couple of
>hundred backwoods incestuous dumfuks.
[chuckle]
>
>As the poster said, Kluelouse, 99.53% of the world population-
LOL
>---including a
>large fraction of the 50 million paranoids called U.S. gun owners who are
>askeered of the gubbamint takin' they'a guns (sic) but still don't believe
>toddlers should be PLAYING WITH REAL GUNS----is aghast that parents would
>even think to give a toddler a gun, let alone actually do so.
meaning of words that they [try to] use.
Smaller guns meant to "fit" a child are good things. It allows them to
learn about guns--- something you freaks haven't been able to do. To
wit:
"You know that these [assault] weapons can shoot down airplanes, they
can blow up railroads. "
-Gun Expert Rev. Jesse Jackson.
"I've seen the bullets that implode. In Sandy Hook, youngsters were
dismembered. "
-Gun expert Dianne Feinstein
"I'm not a sixth grader..."
-Gun expert Dianne Feinstein
"Well, you know, my shotgun will do better for you than your AR-15,
because you want to keep someone away from your house, just fire the
shotgun through the door."
-Gun expert Joe Biden
Congressman Giffords' life was saved and so many others' when
very valiant folks stood up to defend themselves and protect
themselves,
and they did it with ballpoint pens."
-Self Defense Expert Colorado State Sen. Jessie Ulibar
"Can we now shoot the #NRA and everyone who defends them?
#PrayForNewton"
-Houston Democrat Precinct Chair John Cobarruvias
"I said, 'Jill, if there's ever a problem, just walk out on the
balcony here, walk out and
put that double-barrel shotgun and fire two blasts outside the
house.'"
-Gun expert Joe Biden
"There is no hunter that needs automatic military weapons to enjoy the
culture of going hunting, We're talking about millions of kids dying
-- being shot down by assault weapons."
- Crime Expert Charlie Rangel
"I think a lot of senators did not understand that if Florida gives
someone a concealed-carry permit and they have a criminal record a
mile long, you've got to let them carry in your state." Rand said.
-Kristen Rand
Violence Policy Center
Legislative Director
"I will tell you these are ammunition -- bullets -- so the people who
have those now they are going to shoot them, and so if you ban -- if
you ban them in the future, the number of these high capacity
magazines is going to decrease dramatically over time because the
bullets will have been shot and there won't be any more available,"
she said.
A spokeswoman issued a statement to the Denver Post, which had flagged
the comment as inaccurate, explaining that the congresswoman who has
worked on a high-capacity magazine ban for years "simply misspoke" --
"she should have referred to 'clips,' which cannot be reused because
they don't have a feeding mechanism."
-Firearms Expert Rep. Diana DeGette (D)
Q: Do you know what a barrel shroud is?
A: I actually don't know what a barrel shroud is.... I believe it is a
shoulder thing that goes up.
-Firearms Expert Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY)
"For target shooting, that's okay. Get a license and go to the range.
For defense of the home, that's why we have police departments."
-Former Reagan White House Press Sec. James Brady
speaking on the right to bear arms."
Don't condemn the gangbangers, they've got guns that are trafficked --
that are not enforced, that are straw purchased and they come into
places even that have strong gun laws."
- Crime Expert Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas)
"2nd Amendment must go. Violence has 2 stop."
-Jay Mohr Twitter reaction to Boston marathon bomb.
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 3, 2013, 11:57:27 AM5/3/13
to
Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote on Fri 03 May 2013
07:50:53a
doing when they see Americans murdering themselves in the Somalia in which
they live, Kluelouse.
>>>---including a
>>large fraction of the 50 million paranoids called U.S. gun owners who are
>>askeered of the gubbamint takin' they'a guns (sic) but still don't believe
>>toddlers should be PLAYING WITH REAL GUNS----is aghast that parents would
>>even think to give a toddler a gun, let alone actually do so.
There is one thing that even me and a gun-fondling filthy right winger like
you agree on: that the reason for the idiosyncratic American obsession with
guns in all probability boils down to the massive failure of the American
education system at all levels and venues.
Your very presence as an appallingly stupid, gun-fondling dumbass only
leaves others with the impression that monumental ignorance accounts for why
anyone would lack the sense to want weapons safety. The alternative is to
characterize you not so much as being stupid or ignorant, or both, but to
dismiss you rightly as suffering from some severe psychopathology which is
refractory to therapeutic efforts. And in your case, with your panicked
attempts at trying to justify an unjustifiable position by employing the
fallacies of the insane, that certainly cannot be ruled out.
The disarmingly sagacious Bill Maher has stated that the Constitution needs
a "page 1 rewrite" clearly for the sole purpose of using the contemporary
vernacular to make the intentions of the Founders understood by even idiots
like you. He and the rest of humanity capable of sanity and reason---which
he assumes includes the Founders were they alive today---realizes that
changes in technology and society have been such that the Founders believed
that future generations would not lose a sense of proportion and do stupid
things like keep small arms in their homes for the purpose of revolting
against a government whose officials and policies are still determined by
ballot and not by bullet. And that does not take into account the fact that
divisions of heavily armed special forces can take out large numbers of the
U.S. population virtually unequipped to use the tactics of guerila war. The
Founders are all the more likely to be shocked at how the 2nd Amendment has
been misused and abused in complete defiance and denial of the FACTS showing
that the small arms in the casual possession of the average citizen are more
likely to be used against the owner of the weapon himself than against "bad
guys." The Founders know that bad guys are taken down and out by properly
constituted police forces...NOT BY VIGILANTES. Of course, of all things,
you and your clan members, Kluelouse, have no understanding of that---in
fact, you and your clan are fully askeered (sic) of properly constituted
police forces!
Yes, we almost certainly need a Constitutional re-write. Madison,
Jefferson, Franklin, Adams, and the whole lot of them would be shocked that
we are still working with so much of the document they wrote originally.
They would look at the fact that 25% of the population have only 6%
representation in the Senate. The Senate was formed by something called The
Great Compromise, this the Founders would attest to: it was not formed by
something called The Great Reaming, a metaphor I know that you can relate
to. The Founders would find the demographics existing today unacceptable
for constituting government in this modern era. For those objecting to
constitutional revision, the alternative is dis-Union, possibly preliminary
to a civil war. There can be no government (or taxation) without PROPER
representation (the adjective is important), and in that absence, revolt is
necessary and itself proper.
Considering the position of gun-fondling filthy right wingers is ULTIMATELY
self-destructive to society, gun safety advocates are content that over
time, law and policy will fall in line with the civilized, developed nations
on the planet. Primitives like you, Kluelouse, will see Maher prevail in
giving this nation a Constitution for a modern society. If it does not
evolve thusly, then the United States comes to an ignominious end, and
breaks up into smaller nation-states, some populated by barbarous savages---
you and your clan---but others representing the sentries of civilized
members of Homo sapiens, and necessariliy building fortress walls to keep
your ilk out while you continue down the path of self-destruction in
hopefully rapid fashion.
RD Sandman
May 3, 2013, 12:12:48 PM5/3/13
to
GOP_Decline_and_Fall <D...@null.net> wrote in
news:gfo6o8dit5p2ofm7j...@4ax.com:
Actually, what should have the world "reeling in horror in this tale" is
the lack of parental supervision of their children and diligence in
ensuring that a firearm left unattended (which should not happen with
kids that young) and in unknown (loaded or unloaded) condition.
news:gfo6o8dit5p2ofm7j...@4ax.com:
the lack of parental supervision of their children and diligence in
ensuring that a firearm left unattended (which should not happen with
kids that young) and in unknown (loaded or unloaded) condition.
SaPeIsMa
May 3, 2013, 12:16:50 PM5/3/13
to
"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:klv040$1j7$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
> news:XnsA1B49DE9D...@216.196.121.131...
>
> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
> news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message
>
> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
> news:XnsA1B49DE9D...@216.196.121.131...
>
> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
> news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>> news:0Ffgt.10044$MS1....@newsfe05.iad...
>>
>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>
>> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally
>> own a rifle?
>
> # Legally own, yes......legally buy, no.
>
> Another one of those legal things. Here in CA, a 5 year old can't "own" a
> gun.
> Kentucky seems to have no lower age limit to "own".
> The Brady Act prohibits persons under 18 from owning a long gun (except in
> VT...16).
>
> So...YMMV
>
You are conflating "own" with "purchase"
>>
>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>
>> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally
>> own a rifle?
>
> # Legally own, yes......legally buy, no.
>
> Another one of those legal things. Here in CA, a 5 year old can't "own" a
> gun.
> Kentucky seems to have no lower age limit to "own".
> The Brady Act prohibits persons under 18 from owning a long gun (except in
> VT...16).
>
> So...YMMV
>
The words do have different meanings
Wayne
May 3, 2013, 12:17:43 PM5/3/13
to
"RD Sandman" wrote in message
"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
news:klv040$1j7$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>
> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
> news:XnsA1B49DE9D...@216.196.121.131...
>
> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
> news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message
>> news:0Ffgt.10044$MS1....@newsfe05.iad...
>>
>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>
>> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally
>> own a rifle?
>
> # Legally own, yes......legally buy, no.
>
> Another one of those legal things. Here in CA, a 5 year old can't
> "own" a gun.
> Kentucky seems to have no lower age limit to "own".
> The Brady Act prohibits persons under 18 from owning a long gun
> (except in VT...16).
>
> So...YMMV
>
>
# and 21 for a handgun. You are correct in that a state may have its own
# laws on age, but your statement about only in Vermont is incorrect.
# Arizona, for example, also says 18 for a long gun and 21 for a handgun.
Yes, but I was talking about the "own" laws, not the "buy" laws.
For what it is worth, my source was Wikipedia (chuckle)
"The following list of prohibited persons[8] are ineligible to own firearms
under the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.[9]
<snip>
-Minors defined as under the age of eighteen for long guns and the age of
twenty-one for handguns, with the exception of Vermont, eligible at age
sixteen."
# I believe that is also true for California. You may own one if it was
# purchased by a legal purchaser like your parent, but you cannot buy one
# yourself until you reach those ages listed above.
In CA the laws are weird and in a state of flux. Currently, as best I can
tell, minors can possess (legally acquired), but not "own" guns.
All of that is likely to change this year.
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 3, 2013, 1:13:07 PM5/3/13
to
GOP_Decline_and_Fall <D...@null.net> wrote on Fri 03 May 2013 12:09:58a
> On Thu, 02 May 2013 09:24:23 -0600, deep wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks
>>>lunacy. It is about parents who should be arrested.
>>
>>On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
>>children from bad parents whenever possible. But on the other hand I
>>can't help but think that if Dumbfuck right wing trailer trash wants
>>to let their retarded children kill each other off, why the hell not?
>>
>>All hail Darwin!
>
> A two year old child is NOT "right wing trailer trash"
If you accept that one must complete an apprenticeship first...
> That a company is allowed to manufacture and market deadly weapons to
> children and parents give then as gifts to pre-schoolers is what has
> the rest of the world reeling in horror in this tale.
Jurisdictions should examine their statutes presently and make a
determination that the three following conditions must obtain should the
circumstances that occurred exactly as they did in Kentucky, Dumfukistan
arise:
1. The parents would be arrested and charged and convicted for felony
parental neglect/abuse for allowing use or possession of a weapon, loaded or
unloaded, irrespective of supervision, for a child below a certain age (the
age where there is a transition from pre-adolescence to adolescence would be
a logical cutoff)
2. All surviving children are made wards of the state and placed into caring
homes (including and especially LGBT homes in blue states)
3. The parents agree that they are never to reproduce again as a condition
of (a) staying out of prison and (b) having the newborn again made wards of
the state for placement into homes suitable for child development
Jurisdictions finding that those conditions do not obtain should amend their
laws as soon as humanly possible so they can credible claim to have joined
the ranks of civlized societies.
> On Thu, 02 May 2013 09:24:23 -0600, deep wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 2 May 2013 15:13:07 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>>Citizen" <Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>1. The point of this thread is not about the no-background-checks
>>>lunacy. It is about parents who should be arrested.
>>
>>On one hand, of course, the moral high ground is to protect the
>>children from bad parents whenever possible. But on the other hand I
>>can't help but think that if Dumbfuck right wing trailer trash wants
>>to let their retarded children kill each other off, why the hell not?
>>
>>All hail Darwin!
>
> A two year old child is NOT "right wing trailer trash"
> That a company is allowed to manufacture and market deadly weapons to
> children and parents give then as gifts to pre-schoolers is what has
> the rest of the world reeling in horror in this tale.
determination that the three following conditions must obtain should the
circumstances that occurred exactly as they did in Kentucky, Dumfukistan
arise:
1. The parents would be arrested and charged and convicted for felony
parental neglect/abuse for allowing use or possession of a weapon, loaded or
unloaded, irrespective of supervision, for a child below a certain age (the
age where there is a transition from pre-adolescence to adolescence would be
a logical cutoff)
2. All surviving children are made wards of the state and placed into caring
homes (including and especially LGBT homes in blue states)
3. The parents agree that they are never to reproduce again as a condition
of (a) staying out of prison and (b) having the newborn again made wards of
the state for placement into homes suitable for child development
Jurisdictions finding that those conditions do not obtain should amend their
laws as soon as humanly possible so they can credible claim to have joined
the ranks of civlized societies.
RD Sandman
May 3, 2013, 3:35:10 PM5/3/13
to
"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
news:km0not$ofe$1...@dont-email.me:
IOW, this whole discussion has been on the words, "own" versus
"possess", "have control of" or "belong to"?
news:km0not$ofe$1...@dont-email.me:
"possess", "have control of" or "belong to"?
RD Sandman
May 3, 2013, 3:36:40 PM5/3/13
to
"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B5688522...@78.46.70.116:
Good think you and your Pissed off Prostate don't rule the country. We
would have to address you if you did.
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B5688522...@78.46.70.116:
would have to address you if you did.
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 3, 2013, 4:05:27 PM5/3/13
to
RD Sandman <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote on Fri 03 May 2013
12:36:40p
Just an FYI to you: you know those liberals you consider to be easy targets
because they are pansies who will put pansies in your gun barrels in an
attempt to sue for peace, who won't handle weapons themselves in attempt to
defend themselves or their principles, and who cannot be relied upon to take
you gun-fondling filthy right wingers out in some civil war???
Well, I am the OTHER KIND of liberal, who will likely prevail upon you to
shine my shoes, seeing as you are only fit for that kind of task.
--
The Enraged Apostate
12:36:40p
because they are pansies who will put pansies in your gun barrels in an
attempt to sue for peace, who won't handle weapons themselves in attempt to
defend themselves or their principles, and who cannot be relied upon to take
you gun-fondling filthy right wingers out in some civil war???
Well, I am the OTHER KIND of liberal, who will likely prevail upon you to
shine my shoes, seeing as you are only fit for that kind of task.
--
The Enraged Apostate
Wayne
May 3, 2013, 4:18:21 PM5/3/13
to
"RD Sandman" wrote in message
# "possess", "have control of" or "belong to"?
Well, yeah.. between us :)
My initial post was in response to the OPs strange notions of a 5 year old's
gun rights.
RD Sandman
May 3, 2013, 4:18:58 PM5/3/13
to
"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B585BB57...@78.46.70.116:
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
who will put pansies in your gun
> barrels in an attempt to sue for peace, who won't handle weapons
> themselves in attempt to defend themselves or their principles, and
> who cannot be relied upon to take you gun-fondling filthy right
> wingers out in some civil war???
>
> Well, I am the OTHER KIND of liberal, who will likely prevail upon you
> to shine my shoes, seeing as you are only fit for that kind of task.
belong to no party and am registered as independent. I don't fancy
myself to better than anyone else nor do I look at liberals as pansies
although in your case, I may make an exception.
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 3, 2013, 4:33:59 PM5/3/13
to
RD Sandman <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote on Fri 03 May 2013
01:18:58p
Who is "WE"? Independents are truly independents: they act as indiviuals,
not as members of a group. "Parties" are groups, whether formally or
informally established. I never attributed you to be a member of a formally
established or constituted "party" except to that party of assholes who can
only be described as gun-fondling filthy right wingers. That certainly
describes you [the plural]---the "we" in your post---adequately. Should you
gun-fondling filthy right wingers want to formalize your association, let me
know, and then I will be sure to capitalize the words: Gun-Fondling Filthy
Right Wingers.
And if and when I rule the country, don't forget to use "The Honorable ..."
form of respect in addressing me.
Cubano Rubio : Another anchor baby whose parents swam to FLorida
May 3, 2013, 4:38:31 PM5/3/13
to
On 5/1/2013 3:18 PM, ConsƦcons wrote:
> Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
> _______________________________________
> Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
> (AFP) - 1 hour ago
>
>
> US boy, 5, accidentally shoots and kills sister, 2
>
> It comes in a number of child-friendly barrel designs and colors,
> including hot pink for little girls. A host of accessories are also
> available, like story books and a gun-toting beanie baby of the rifle's
> mascot, a cartoonish cricket.
At least it stopped one rigtTTard Ko0K from reproducing.
Hopefully her parents are charged with an slaughter.
---
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_NUZ_fM-TQKQ/Sf9PJCiSbLI/AAAAAAAANYI/wzO53XgcCrM/s400/cry_baby.jpg
SAVE AMERICA!!
Spay or neuter
your Republican!!
--
--> Slow thinkers --> Stay Right
The NRA is a Terrorist group
May 3, 2013, 4:39:36 PM5/3/13
to
On 5/2/2013 1:14 PM, Wayne wrote:
>
>
> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message news:0Ffgt.10044$MS1....@newsfe05.iad...
>
>
>
> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message news:0Ffgt.10044$MS1....@newsfe05.iad...
>
>> Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>
>
> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally
> own a rifle?
>
>
The parents need prosecuted for murder.
> own a rifle?
>
>
--
Loon Party: http://www.twitpic.com/8zi369/full
RD Sandman
May 3, 2013, 4:54:38 PM5/3/13
to
"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
news:km15s2$t4v$1...@dont-email.me:
I even feel that the kid has the right to own that gun (no matter which
definition is used) as long as he has parental consent. I was around 12
when I got mine. It was a Mossberg 146B circa 1950. I also had a .22
H&R922 9-shot revolver when I was 13 or 14.
news:km15s2$t4v$1...@dont-email.me:
definition is used) as long as he has parental consent. I was around 12
when I got mine. It was a Mossberg 146B circa 1950. I also had a .22
H&R922 9-shot revolver when I was 13 or 14.
RD Sandman
May 3, 2013, 5:00:15 PM5/3/13
to
"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B58A92E8...@78.46.70.116:
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
words I did above:
"Good [thing] you and your Pissed off Prostate don't rule the country.
We would have to address you if you did."
> Who is "WE"? Independents are truly independents: they act as
> indiviuals, not as members of a group.
Groups are made up of individuals with a common interest.
> indiviuals, not as members of a group.
"Parties" are groups, whether
> formally or informally established. I never attributed you to be a
> member of a formally established or constituted "party" except to that
> party of assholes who can only be described as gun-fondling filthy
> right wingers.
make. I can be an asshole, however.
That certainly describes you [the plural]---the "we"
> in your post---adequately. Should you gun-fondling filthy right
> wingers want to formalize your association, let me know, and then I
> will be sure to capitalize the words: Gun-Fondling Filthy Right
> Wingers.
>
> And if and when I rule the country, don't forget to use "The Honorable
> ..." form of respect in addressing me.
RD Sandman
May 3, 2013, 5:01:06 PM5/3/13
to
The NRA is a Terrorist group <la...@lkas.com> wrote in news:51842089$0
$12756$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net:
> On 5/2/2013 1:14 PM, Wayne wrote:
>>
>>
>> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message news:0Ffgt.10044$MS1.3733
$12756$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net:
> On 5/2/2013 1:14 PM, Wayne wrote:
>>
>>
@newsfe05.iad...
>>
>>> Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>
>> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally
>> own a rifle?
>>
>>
>
> The parents need prosecuted for murder.
>
Reckless (or child) endangerment, yes. Murder??
>>
>>> Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>
>> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally
>> own a rifle?
>>
>>
>
> The parents need prosecuted for murder.
>
Sid9
May 3, 2013, 5:50:41 PM5/3/13
to
"RD Sandman" <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA1B4D9BA7...@216.196.121.131...
> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
> news:klv040$1j7$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
>> news:XnsA1B49DE9D...@216.196.121.131...
>>
>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
>> news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message
> news:klv040$1j7$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>>
>>
>> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
>> news:XnsA1B49DE9D...@216.196.121.131...
>>
>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
>> news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> news:0Ffgt.10044$MS1....@newsfe05.iad...
>>>
>>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>>
>>> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally
>>> own a rifle?
>>
>> # Legally own, yes......legally buy, no.
>>
>> Another one of those legal things. Here in CA, a 5 year old can't
>> "own" a gun.
>> Kentucky seems to have no lower age limit to "own".
>> The Brady Act prohibits persons under 18 from owning a long gun
>> (except in VT...16).
>>
>> So...YMMV
>>
>>
>
> Federal law sets the ages at 18 to purchase a long gun (rifle or shotgun)
> and 21 for a handgun. You are correct in that a state may have its own
> laws on age, but your statement about only in Vermont is incorrect.
> Arizona, for example, also says 18 for a long gun and 21 for a handgun.
>
> I believe that is also true for California. You may own one if it was
> purchased by a legal purchaser like your parent, but you cannot buy one
> yourself until you reach those ages listed above.
>
> --
> Sleep well, tonight.....
>
> RD (The Sandman
>
> You can be young without money, but you
> can't be old without it.
...and if you are a damned fool you can give one to five year old
>>>
>>>>Only in the U.S.A. . . . . No background checks needed.
>>>
>>> And somehow you believe that a 5 year old can actually buy or legally
>>> own a rifle?
>>
>> # Legally own, yes......legally buy, no.
>>
>> Another one of those legal things. Here in CA, a 5 year old can't
>> "own" a gun.
>> Kentucky seems to have no lower age limit to "own".
>> The Brady Act prohibits persons under 18 from owning a long gun
>> (except in VT...16).
>>
>> So...YMMV
>>
>>
>
> Federal law sets the ages at 18 to purchase a long gun (rifle or shotgun)
> and 21 for a handgun. You are correct in that a state may have its own
> laws on age, but your statement about only in Vermont is incorrect.
> Arizona, for example, also says 18 for a long gun and 21 for a handgun.
>
> I believe that is also true for California. You may own one if it was
> purchased by a legal purchaser like your parent, but you cannot buy one
> yourself until you reach those ages listed above.
>
> --
> Sleep well, tonight.....
>
> RD (The Sandman
>
> You can be young without money, but you
> can't be old without it.
kindergartener.
Enraged Apostate, World Citizen
May 3, 2013, 5:53:08 PM5/3/13
to
RD Sandman <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote on Fri 03 May 2013 02:00:15p
One has to wonder why you thought it was to your advantage in you
establishing your incompetence in understanding the English language.
>> Who is "WE"? Independents are truly independents: they act as
>> indiviuals, not as members of a group.
>
> Groups are made up of individuals with a common interest.
As are parties. One supposes you have a point other than simple-minded
sophistry.
manufacture, distribution, use, and possession of weapons of this class, say,
as in the United Kingdom are not as you have expressed them to be in Usenet
posts, or they have been misconstrued?
I could go down a checkmark list of items that establish you as filthy and
right-wing on issues related to guns alone.
At any rate, on the issue of being right-wing, you have already damned
yourself: you said "I was a liberal once myself." If you're not a liberal,
then you are a right winger, and if you are right winger, ipso facto you are
filthy. See how that works?
> I can be an asshole, however.
As if I need convincing...? Don't bother with gratuitously obvious
statements.
> That certainly describes you [the plural]---the "we"
>> in your post---adequately. Should you gun-fondling filthy right
>> wingers want to formalize your association, let me know, and then I
>> will be sure to capitalize the words: Gun-Fondling Filthy Right
>> Wingers.
>>
>> And if and when I rule the country, don't forget to use "The Honorable
>> ..." form of respect in addressing me.
>
> At least you have a sense of humor. That is ONE good trait. ;)
But you being a gun fondler is a regrettable trait. There are coping
mechanisms however. The good news for you is that you really MAY not be
beyond saving.
establishing your incompetence in understanding the English language.
>> Who is "WE"? Independents are truly independents: they act as
>> indiviuals, not as members of a group.
>
> Groups are made up of individuals with a common interest.
sophistry.
>
> "Parties" are groups, whether
>> formally or informally established. I never attributed you to be a
>> member of a formally established or constituted "party" except to that
>> party of assholes who can only be described as gun-fondling filthy
>> right wingers.
>
> However, I am not filthy, nor right wing. Those are assumptions you
> make.
Then your positions on gun safety and the need for the regulation of the
> "Parties" are groups, whether
>> formally or informally established. I never attributed you to be a
>> member of a formally established or constituted "party" except to that
>> party of assholes who can only be described as gun-fondling filthy
>> right wingers.
>
> However, I am not filthy, nor right wing. Those are assumptions you
> make.
manufacture, distribution, use, and possession of weapons of this class, say,
as in the United Kingdom are not as you have expressed them to be in Usenet
posts, or they have been misconstrued?
I could go down a checkmark list of items that establish you as filthy and
right-wing on issues related to guns alone.
At any rate, on the issue of being right-wing, you have already damned
yourself: you said "I was a liberal once myself." If you're not a liberal,
then you are a right winger, and if you are right winger, ipso facto you are
filthy. See how that works?
> I can be an asshole, however.
statements.
> That certainly describes you [the plural]---the "we"
>> in your post---adequately. Should you gun-fondling filthy right
>> wingers want to formalize your association, let me know, and then I
>> will be sure to capitalize the words: Gun-Fondling Filthy Right
>> Wingers.
>>
>> And if and when I rule the country, don't forget to use "The Honorable
>> ..." form of respect in addressing me.
>
> At least you have a sense of humor. That is ONE good trait. ;)
mechanisms however. The good news for you is that you really MAY not be
beyond saving.
Wayne
May 3, 2013, 6:51:18 PM5/3/13
to
"Sid9" wrote in message news:km1b96$49a$1...@dont-email.me...
# kindergartener.
Nope. Just have to bring them up right.
I had about 20 cousins in my age range. My grandparents kept a double
barrel 12 guage next to the door. All the kids learned to NOT TOUCH IT, and
to stop other kids from touching it, and to report to an adult, anybody who
did touch it.
Never had that occur.
Klaus Schadenfreude
May 3, 2013, 7:47:49 PM5/3/13
to
On Fri, 3 May 2013 15:57:27 +0000 (UTC), "Enraged Apostate, World
>LOL is precisely what the 99.53% [..]
You should have no trouble getting Universal Background Checks passed
THIS time!
ROFLMAO
>>>>---including a
>>>large fraction of the 50 million paranoids called U.S. gun owners who are
>>>askeered of the gubbamint takin' they'a guns (sic) but still don't believe
>>>toddlers should be PLAYING WITH REAL GUNS----is aghast that parents would
>>>even think to give a toddler a gun, let alone actually do so.
>
>[...sewer-clogging flush of pathetic drivel...]
>
>There is one thing that even me and a gun-fondling filthy right winger like
>you agree on: that the reason for the idiosyncratic American obsession with
>guns in all probability boils down to the massive failure of the American
>education system at all levels and venues.
I can tell THAT just from your posts.
You should have no trouble getting Universal Background Checks passed
THIS time!
ROFLMAO
>>>>---including a
>>>large fraction of the 50 million paranoids called U.S. gun owners who are
>>>askeered of the gubbamint takin' they'a guns (sic) but still don't believe
>>>toddlers should be PLAYING WITH REAL GUNS----is aghast that parents would
>>>even think to give a toddler a gun, let alone actually do so.
>
>[...sewer-clogging flush of pathetic drivel...]
>
>There is one thing that even me and a gun-fondling filthy right winger like
>you agree on: that the reason for the idiosyncratic American obsession with
>guns in all probability boils down to the massive failure of the American
>education system at all levels and venues.
Sid9
May 3, 2013, 8:12:07 PM5/3/13
to
news:km1eqq$psh$1...@dont-email.me...
Is Little Abner one of your cousins?
How;s Daisy Mae these days?
How;s Daisy Mae these days?
Wayne
May 3, 2013, 8:23:44 PM5/3/13
to
"Sid9" wrote in message news:km1jic$klj$1...@dont-email.me...
# How;s Daisy Mae these days?
Good one Sid. You really got me with that zinger.
RD Sandman
May 4, 2013, 4:47:52 PM5/4/13
to
"Enraged Apostate, World Citizen"
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
news:XnsA1B597FD09...@78.46.70.116:
<Finding...@Every.Opportunity.invalid> wrote in
> I could go down a checkmark list of items that establish you as filthy
> and right-wing on issues related to guns alone.
> At any rate, on the issue of being right-wing, you have already damned
> yourself: you said "I was a liberal once myself." If you're not a
> liberal, then you are a right winger, and if you are right winger,
> ipso facto you are filthy. See how that works?
>> I can be an asshole, however.
>
> As if I need convincing...? Don't bother with gratuitously obvious
> statements.
RD Sandman
May 4, 2013, 4:50:06 PM5/4/13
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:km1b96$49a$1...@dont-email.me:
>
> "RD Sandman" <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:XnsA1B4D9BA7...@216.196.121.131...
>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
>> news:klv040$1j7$1...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
>>> news:XnsA1B49DE9D...@216.196.121.131...
>>>
>>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
>>> news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message
And you are an idiot who can't read with comprehension. What I said was
the truth. You CAN give one to a five year old. Do I think it is a good
idea? NO! But you couldn't wait to find that out before making remarks
that tend to make you look like an ass.....an ignorant one.
>
> "RD Sandman" <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:XnsA1B4D9BA7...@216.196.121.131...
>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
>> news:klv040$1j7$1...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
>>> news:XnsA1B49DE9D...@216.196.121.131...
>>>
>>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
>>> news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
the truth. You CAN give one to a five year old. Do I think it is a good
idea? NO! But you couldn't wait to find that out before making remarks
that tend to make you look like an ass.....an ignorant one.
RD Sandman
May 4, 2013, 4:52:04 PM5/4/13
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:km1jic$klj$1...@dont-email.me:
>
> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:km1eqq$psh$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>> "Sid9" wrote in message news:km1b96$49a$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>> "RD Sandman" <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:XnsA1B4D9BA7...@216.196.121.131...
>>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
>>> news:klv040$1j7$1...@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
>>>> news:XnsA1B49DE9D...@216.196.121.131...
>>>>
>>>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
>>>> news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "ConsƦcons" wrote in message
Bet you wish you really knew. She's getting a tad long in the tooth just
like Moonbeam McSwine but both of them are probably more than you could
hope for.
>
> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:km1eqq$psh$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>> "Sid9" wrote in message news:km1b96$49a$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>> "RD Sandman" <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:XnsA1B4D9BA7...@216.196.121.131...
>>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
>>> news:klv040$1j7$1...@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
>>>> news:XnsA1B49DE9D...@216.196.121.131...
>>>>
>>>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
>>>> news:klua7r$7q8$1...@dont-email.me:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
like Moonbeam McSwine but both of them are probably more than you could
hope for.
pyotr filipivich
May 5, 2013, 12:58:32 PM5/5/13
to
Let the Record show that RD Sandman <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> on
or about Sat, 04 May 2013 15:52:04 -0500 did write, type or otherwise
cause to appear in talk.politics.guns the following:
Snip
OTOH, Sadie Hawkins might. But then again, Sadie knows that there
is a pack cats just waiting for her to turn 30 unmarried.... so she's
kind of desperate.
Might even be desperate enough.
tschus
pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
Gungrabber: Why would anyone need a 30 or 40 shot magazine
for any kind of sporting or protective purpose?
Bennet Langlotz: Why does the government *need* me to
take the time to reload?
or about Sat, 04 May 2013 15:52:04 -0500 did write, type or otherwise
cause to appear in talk.politics.guns the following:
Snip
>>>
>>> # ...and if you are a damned fool you can give one to five year old
>>> # kindergartener.
>>>
>>> Nope. Just have to bring them up right.
>>> I had about 20 cousins in my age range. My grandparents kept a
>>> double barrel 12 guage next to the door. All the kids learned to NOT
>>> TOUCH IT, and to stop other kids from touching it, and to report to
>>> an adult, anybody who did touch it.
>>>
>>> Never had that occur.
>>
>> Is Little Abner one of your cousins?
>> How;s Daisy Mae these days?
>
>
>Bet you wish you really knew. She's getting a tad long in the tooth just
>like Moonbeam McSwine but both of them are probably more than you could
>hope for.
I doubt that either of those ladies would be interested in him.
>>> # ...and if you are a damned fool you can give one to five year old
>>> # kindergartener.
>>>
>>> Nope. Just have to bring them up right.
>>> I had about 20 cousins in my age range. My grandparents kept a
>>> double barrel 12 guage next to the door. All the kids learned to NOT
>>> TOUCH IT, and to stop other kids from touching it, and to report to
>>> an adult, anybody who did touch it.
>>>
>>> Never had that occur.
>>
>> Is Little Abner one of your cousins?
>> How;s Daisy Mae these days?
>
>
>Bet you wish you really knew. She's getting a tad long in the tooth just
>like Moonbeam McSwine but both of them are probably more than you could
>hope for.
OTOH, Sadie Hawkins might. But then again, Sadie knows that there
is a pack cats just waiting for her to turn 30 unmarried.... so she's
kind of desperate.
Might even be desperate enough.
tschus
pyotr
--
pyotr filipivich
Gungrabber: Why would anyone need a 30 or 40 shot magazine
for any kind of sporting or protective purpose?
Bennet Langlotz: Why does the government *need* me to
take the time to reload?
0 new messages