When is congress going to stop this meglomaniac who CONTINUES to push
America into unilateral wars against the entire Moslem world? Is being a
"war president" some sort of drug to this guy? Maybe he feels being a war
president is the only way he can get people to pay attention to him. Perhaps
he needs to be able to have people killed people to feel important.
The world's other democracies are avoiding Bush like the plague after he
showed his contempt for the world's hope, the United Nations, by attacking
Iraq under false pretenses. Why are some (32%) Americans still allowing
themselves to be dragged into more wars by this delusional madman?
Just think, we have almost TWO MORE YEARS of this guy!!!
Hello; Bill
There seems to be many wars. The war on terror, war on drugs and so
on. Then the undeclared wars on civil liberties, the enviroment, open
free speech, we now need free speech zones?
In times of war, the rich get richer and the poor die.
It's been said (sung) love is the drug for me, maybe war is the drug
for others.
Two years, we hope. Many worry he will find a way to stay, you know
for the greater good of us all.
Take care,
spike
--
This page details how cruel and self serving our courts are in Ontario
Canada, under the so called leadership of Dalton McGuinty have become.
They even have the balls to send me threatening letters, warning me
not to show you what they are doing.
http://thevandalnextdoordeaththreatsandmore.asar-intl.com/
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=65000531
Hillary and Hamas
The first lady has a long record of association
with Islamic militants.
Even as wave after wave of Terror appear over the horizon
as did so many Luftwaffe during WW][, why is it that the LIBs
not only deny their point of origin, but also their intent?
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/archives/whitehouse-
papers/1993/Oct/Presidents-Somalia-Message-to-Congress-1993-10-13
"to leave now we would send a message to terrorists
and other potential adversaries around the world that
they can change our policies by killing our people.
It would be open season on Americans."
-- Bill Clinton '93
just before he pulled out of Somalia
Exactly WHAT qualifies Hillary to deal
with the likes of Deliberately Evil Men?
Her record shows that she will factually
tolerate the intolerable and defend the indefensible.
The only thing necessary for Evil to
prosper is for good men to do Absolutely Nothing.
HELLWORLD stands for HILLARY. She has SUCH sights to show you.
when it comes down to facing-down a movement that not-only likens
ALL-WOMEN to 'uncovered meat'but-also which would stone you to death
for having a cold beer on a hot afternoon, WHERE IS THE LIB OUTRAGE?
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52630
compares victims to 'uncovered meat' that attracts cats
Australia's top Muslim cleric rationalized a series of gang rapes by
Arab men, blaming women who "sway suggestively," wear make-up and
don't cover themselves in the tradition of Islam.
She justifies an evil which has no justification,
nor does it seek any.
Both Clinton's have disgraced
their office and betrayed us ALL,
why shouldn't the Guilty be Rewarded?
why shouldn't the Innocent be Punished?
why shouldn't the Depraved be Championed
on the basis of their Depravity?
This is Clinton's Bridge to the 21st Century,
a Glasnost to Terror the likes of which the World has never seen.
A world where he justifies wiretapping Princes Diana, while declaring
Mohammed Atta hands-off no matter what the evidence.
"I have advocated engagement with our enemies"
-- Hillary'07.
I believe in evil and I think that there
are evil people in the world.
-- Hillary'93
We can't afford to have that money go to the private sector.
The money has to go to the federal government because the
federal government will spend that money better than the
private sector will spend it.
-- Hillary'93
http://www.hillnews.com/news/032503/hillary.aspx
It's HARD to be Humble when you're HILLARY.
Bill Clinton did what he did because he could.
Hillary does it because she LIKES it.
She has SUCH sights to show you.
---
LIB's plead for a Morality which holds COMPROMISE as it's standard of
Value, making it possible to judge Virtue on the basis of the number of
Values which one is willing to Betray.
http://www.slate.com/id/2151932/entry/2152209/
CLINTON:
he cannily exploits his understanding of human nature
for his own advantage. He's always gaming people,
measuring them, working them over to gain an edge
[rest snipped]
Well, there you have it. So, did you want us to elect
Pat Robertson instead?
He'll at least continue the war in Iran and continue
cutting taxes. The people will love the latter.
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Q: "Why is my computer doing that?"
A: "Don't do that and you'll be fine."
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
What candidates do LIBs offer?
Hillary. Second only to the Anti-christ.
Obama. Second ony to Zacharaias Moussaoui.
McCain. Who should be named McClinton.
Hillary. HAMAS. HEZBOLLAH.
Why settle for the lesser evil? HELLWORLD stands for Hillary.
I was thinking more along the lines of repealing Amendment
22 and reelecting George Bush (VP Newt Gingrich or Tom
Delay), as well as putting a supermajority of Republicans
back in power. Then we enact the following.
[1] Increase main tax rate to 40% across-the-board,
no exemptions or exceptions, up to $9M/year income
(this would include rents, dividends and capital gains).
Passage of additional legislation to require states to
follow suit with a 10% maximum tax of their own.
[2] Negative tax region from $9M to $10M (-360%
incremental), so that those making $10M and more pay
nothing, to neither state nor federal.
[3] Elimination of the minimum wage, estate tax, SS,
Medicare, Medicaid, and grants to each State of the
Union for such things as transportation and housing.
I'd have to look up the details. Note that the current
SS tax, which is classified as regressive, would *not*
be rescinded, but neither would it go towards SS (as that
would no longer exist), but to the general Federal fund.
It would also be shifted to the taxpayer exclusively (at
this time it's half and half). This makes for a total
53% tax rate for those making less than about $90000.
Note that those making more than $10M would be exempt from
this tax as well. Those between $9M and $10M would pay a
fraction of the tax, that fraction depending on the income
above $9M; for example, those making $9.75M would only be
required to pay $2925 -- 1/4 of $11700.
[4] Passage of a law that exempts those making more than
$10M from state sales tax and property taxes.
[5] Passage of a universal Federal Gun Law. This law would
require that each and every citizen have ready access to
arms and ammo, and usurp all state laws regulating such.
These arms would include assault rifles -- anything that
can be considered "small arms". Note that the original
Constitution did not mention rockets, so devices such as
mortars, mines, and RPGs would not be included. Note also
that this does not include giving away guns or ammo,
but rather selling them at standard market prices.
[6] Allowing free access to each and every immigrant;
there would be no visa granting limitations. Basically,
anyone who wants in and has not been accused of a crime in
his country of origin or in any transient country would be
allowed. (Those that have been accused would stand trial.
Details TBD.)
[7] Full-scale draft and invasion of Iran, Syria, and North
Korea, with the nuclear option fully visible and used if
necessary, and assassination of anyone who gets in our way;
this would of course include Kim Jong Il, Bashar Al-Asad,
Ali Hoseini-Khamenei and Mahmud Ahmadinejad.
[8] Kick the UN out of New York and put them back in Geneva.
Regrettably, I don't see all this happening before 2012,
which makes the repeal of Amendment 22 a bit tricky --
after all, ex-President Clinton would also be available
unless we word it very carefully. (Had we passed the
repeal prior to the 2006 election we might have been able
to word it so that only the sitting President at the time
of the repeal would be eligible.)
Now...what candidates do you offer? :-)
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
/dev/brain: Permission denied
LIBs just CANNOT wait for the day when explosive filled ambulances
careen through the streets toward their targets.
LIBs, what price their Vision?
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/14028.JPG
They have SUCH sights to show you.
22.
> ...
>> Now...what candidates do you offer? :-)
>
>
> LIBs just CANNOT wait for the day when explosive filled ambulances
> careen through the streets toward their targets.
That's not a candidate. That's more of a condition.
Should I put you down for Pat Robertson, George Bush,
or Gene Amondson?
>
> LIBs, what price their Vision?
> http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/14028.JPG
> They have SUCH sights to show you.
>
> "to leave now we would send a message to terrorists
> and other potential adversaries around the world that
> they can change our policies by killing our people.
> It would be open season on Americans."
> -- Bill Clinton '93
> just before he pulled out of Somalia
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Useless C++ Programming Idea #889123:
std::vector<...> v; for(int i = 0; i < v.size(); i++) v.erase(v.begin() + i);
Then why NOT vote to Obama?
Even as wave after wave of terror appear over the horizon.
Why NOT vote for unilateral capitulation to an evil which known none?
KILLARY purports to be both for and against all measures,
for the strategic advantage of the confusion it causes in
those who want-to-believe that such contradictory notions can
exist, it is QUITE obvious BOTH Clinton's will say anything, and
worse, do anything to merely to get what they want -- Common Good be damned
Hillary, the Wrathful, Hillary, the Vindicative, Hillary the TERGIVERSATOR.
Bill did what he did because he could,
Hillary does it because she likes it.
LIBS will be foaming at the mouth to get to
the last glass of koolaide she offers.
She has SUCH sights to show you.
> The Ghost In The Machine wrote
>> In alt.conspiracy, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE
>>> LIBs just CANNOT wait for the day when explosive filled ambulances
>>> careen through the streets toward their targets.
>>
>> That's not a candidate. That's more of a condition.
>
> Then why NOT vote to Obama?
> Even as wave after wave of terror appear over the horizon.
> Why NOT vote for unilateral capitulation to an evil which known none?
No, we Democrats are NOT capitulating to the Republicans -- evil incarnate.
>
> KILLARY purports to be both for and against all measures,
> for the strategic advantage of the confusion it causes in
> those who want-to-believe that such contradictory notions can
> exist, it is QUITE obvious BOTH Clinton's will say anything, and
> worse, do anything to merely to get what they want -- Common Good be damned
>
> Hillary, the Wrathful, Hillary, the Vindicative, Hillary the TERGIVERSATOR.
> Bill did what he did because he could,
> Hillary does it because she likes it.
>
> LIBS will be foaming at the mouth to get to
> the last glass of koolaide she offers.
> She has SUCH sights to show you.
--
There are only two kinds of Republicans: Millionaires and fools.
But of course,
LIBs proudly capitulate to
BILL the PREVARICATOR
HILL the TERGIVERSATOR
How could we have EVER missed that?
LIBs PROUDLY do unto their own
PRECISELY what they forbid us to do to our Adversaries.
Just where *IS* the LIB outrage over the sharia teaching cleric
that some women are no better than 'uncovered meat'
Who better than Clinton to epitomize that?
http://images.ibsys.com/2005/0607/4579503.jpg
This is Clinton's Bridge to the 21st Century.
Indeed. But that pesky 22nd Amendment keeps getting in the way!
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
"Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of
elderberries!" - Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Sssh. That wasn't supposed to be leaked. :-)
Now you've just confused him.
[rest snipped]
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Linux. Because it's not the desktop that's
important, it's the ability to DO something
with it.
Because he's a liberal, of course. I would have thought that obvious.
> Even as wave after wave of terror appear over the horizon.
> Why NOT vote for unilateral capitulation to an evil which known none?
Because we need President Bush to deal with the evil. Why haven't we
repealed Amendment 22 yet?
[rest snipped]
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Linux. Because it's not the desktop that's
important, it's the ability to DO something
with it.
--
... Why haven't we repealed Amendment 22 yet?
Why should there be any limits upon
those who purport to act by the Common Good?
Isn't that the Village it Take?
That's just it. The Village gave us George Bush,
a powerful, capable leader. And it will take it away
unless we repeal Amendment 22.
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
/dev/signature: Not a text file
Why shouldn't things be taken from you in the name of the Common Good?
Why should those who govern have rights that you as the governed do not?
This is Clinton's Bridge to the 21st Century.
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/117871.gif
What's Bush capable of?
I can hardly wait for your answer..
BDK
BOOOSH continues to out-think, out-play, out-last
the best that the LIBs have to throw at him...
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/108137.jpg
BOOOSH:: Still President.
Even as the LIBs continue to lose out to BOOOSH,
we continue to laugh at the LIBs Superior Intellect.
LIBs continue to learn the hard way, one cannot
fake Reality any more than they can fake the character of a man.
LIBs:: Won't you feel their PAIN?
http://allyourbase.planettribes.gamespy.com/video1_view.shtml
All your BASE are belong to BOOOSH.
> BOOOSH continues to out-think, out-play, out-last
> the best that the LIBs have to throw at him...
Just what the masses need... more tv-terminology from the pale-faced
Wii-publikans.
The WiiPublikans are lost in psyberspace and no knot about this thing
called "reality". Good luck with your Hooper ratings.
Coffee in Trinidadbag
LIBs have lost out to BOOOSH on the web as well,
admit your defeat as complete and total and save face!
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/108137.jpg
BOOOSH:: Still President.
LIBs:: Won't you feel their PAIN?
Uh...because it makes absolutely no sense?
> Why should those who govern have rights that you as the governed do not?
Because we gave them those rights. However, because of Amendment 22 we
are going to take back the current President (whose job isn't finished)
and replace him with a total unknown?
Does that make sense?
>
> This is Clinton's Bridge to the 21st Century.
> http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/117871.gif
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Useless C++ Programming Idea #8830129:
std::set<...> v; for(..:iterator i = v.begin(); i != v.end(); i++)
if(*i == thing) {...}
Well, lessee.
[1] He's yet to finish the job in Iraq.
[2] Ditto for Afghanistan.
[3] Ditto for North Korea.
[4] Ditto for Syria, though at this point they're being very very quiet.
(Maybe they're hunting wabbits.)
[4] The economy's going great guns but his tax cuts aren't permanent
yet. Without them the economy will probably go sour.
[5] Immigration borders aren't open enough yet. To cut business costs,
we need more labor, plus the central roadway (I forget its name) which,
IINM, will run from Mexico to somewhere in central Canada.
[6] I've yet to see him pat his stomach, rub his head,
and chew gum at the same time.
[7] We could use more judges that won't legislate from the bench -- or
at least, won't legislate in a liberal direction. Legislating in a
conservative direction from the bench is perfectly OK.
So lessee...maybe we give him about 12 more years to accomplish all
this.
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to find a doctor to perform a
tongueectomy....
:-)
>
> BDK
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Useless C++ Programming Idea #8830129:
std::set<...> v; for(..:iterator i = v.begin(); i != v.end(); i++)
if(*i == thing) {...}
--
> Coffee in Madrid wrote
> > MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:
> >>
> >> BOOOSH continues to out-think, out-play, out-last
> >> the best that the LIBs have to throw at him...
> >
> > Just what the masses need... more tv-terminology from the pale-faced
> > Wii-publikans.
> >
> > The WiiPublikans are lost in psyberspace and no knot about this thing
> > called "reality". Good luck with your Hooper ratings.
>
>
> LIBs have lost out to BOOOSH on the web as well,
> admit your defeat as complete and total and save face!
Hey... its a democracy, and you are completely entitled to your beleifs.
Having said that... I prefer my Democracy with intrinsic intent to
'dis-solve' the False War and PREVENT new ones, before this term is up.
I suggest AA for the "war addiction".
Coffee with Obama (sc)
If it's Peace that you want it is Dictatorship you must oppose,
if it is War you wish to prevent, it is the expropriation of
private capital you must oppose. War, in fact, is only
possible when the wealth of the nation is held by its
leaders rather than rightly utilized by its Citizens.
Vote KILLARY!
We can't afford to have that money go to the private sector.
The money has to go to the federal government because the
federal government will spend that money better than the
private sector will spend it.
-- Hillary'93
http://www.frederiksamuel.com/blog/images/myflags.swf#
LIBs, they have SUCH sights to show you.
> Coffee in Madrid
> > MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE
> >> Coffee in Madrid wrote
> >> > MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:
> >> LIBs have lost out to BOOOSH on the web as well,
> >> admit your defeat as complete and total and save face!
> >
> > Hey... its a democracy, and you are completely entitled to your beleifs.
> >
> > Having said that... I prefer my Democracy with intrinsic intent to
> > 'dis-solve' the False War and PREVENT new ones, before this term is up.
>
>
> If it's Peace that you want it is Dictatorship you must oppose,
I agree with u on this point. Get rid of Bush the wannabe Dictator.
> War, in fact, is only
> possible when the wealth of the nation is held by its
> leaders rather than rightly utilized by its Citizens.
The Clintoon-wealth has been pillaged and taken away from the middle
class to fuel greedy neoConArtists and spark mayhem in the meddle east.
>
> Vote KILLARY!
Have fun finding KILLARY on your electronic ballot.
LOL!
Coffee with Obama
> Coffee in Madrid wrote
> > MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:
> >> War, in fact, is only
> >> possible when the wealth of the nation is held by its
> >> leaders rather than rightly utilized by its Citizens.
> >
> > The Clintoon-wealth has been pillaged and taken away from the middle
> > class to fuel greedy neoConArtists and spark mayhem in the meddle
> > east.
>
>
> We can't afford to have that money go to the private sector.
> The money has to go to the federal government because the
> federal government will spend that money better than the
> private sector will spend it.
> -- Hillary'93
Enjoy your delusions.
"Hillary'93" indeed.
Uhhh... this is 2007 now. Its a 'new kinda world', remember?
Coffee in the Now
Indeed.
HELLWORLD stands for HILLARY.
She has SUCH sights to show you.
LIBs, what price their vision?
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/14028.JPG
> HELLWORLD stands for HILLARY.
Notice how she reacted...
http://www.drownedinsound.com/images/12105.jpeg
Coffee in Zoo Station
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/527.jpg
Hillary's qualifications to deal with Evil Men.
Why? It's not like he's committed any impeacheable offenses like
eavesdropping on phone calls without a warrant or denigrating the army
by ordering them to torture suspects or anything. :-)
>
>> War, in fact, is only
>> possible when the wealth of the nation is held by its
>> leaders rather than rightly utilized by its Citizens.
>
> The Clintoon-wealth
??
> has been pillaged
to strip ruthlessly of money or goods by open violence, as in war;
plunder.
This hasn't happened. I'd say the middle class is losing the money
from a mixture of subterfuge, deception, or other such -- probably
because of the tax cuts. Of course, the Administration is losing
the money because of needless squandering in a certain Middle Eastern
country, which was slightly cracked to begin with (Iraq is part
Kurdistan, part Mesopotamia, and part something else).
> and taken away from the middle
> class to fuel greedy neoConArtists and spark mayhem in the meddle east.
"Meddle" is a nice way of putting it. I would have to look but suspect
we've been meddling in there since the early 20th century, and certainly
did quite a bit of meddling to put Israel where it is today. Some of
it, of course, is good -- Israel really can't be put too many other
places -- and some of it less so -- oops, the Shah of Iran is now dead,
long live the Ayatollah!
And now we've restructured Iraq by removing its head and having him
(eventually) executed.
>
>>
>> Vote KILLARY!
>
> Have fun finding KILLARY on your electronic ballot.
>
> LOL!
Even if one could find Hillary Clinton on one's electronic ballot
(her "baggage" may preclude her being elected in the Democratic
Primary), is there any guarantee that casting one's vote by pressing
her button will be correctly counted later?
It's times like this that I think Canada has some good ideas, eh?
Mark an X on a paper ballot. Can't get too much simpler than that.
>
> Coffee with Obama
It would be interesting, if ultimately pointless for obvious reasons, to
contemplate the three-way race of Obama (black), Hillary (female) and
Condoleeza (black *and* female). Fortunately, I've heard few noises
from Ms. Rice about her aspirations for President. ;-)
(And even fewer noises that she's likely to win. After all, she's part
of the Bush Administration, which makes Nixon look like a saint and
then-President Carter look like an expert in foreign relations. But
never mind that; the economy's going great guns. Reelect the
Republicans in 2008 and continue the prosperity through 2012!)
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
/dev/signature: Resource temporarily unavailable
Hillary knows she'll never take the White House with BILL in tow.
Which one do you think she'll choose?
As first black-widow she can have
the White House and Ellen too...
Hillary won't take the White House anyway, unless she runs
a very hard campaign (and spends a lot of moolah -- but she
does have quite a bit of moolah to spend). Bill Richardson
is getting 33.4% of the vote, with Rudy Giuliani running
second place and Newt in third, in an admitedly very
unscientific straw poll. Clinton is lagging in 10th place,
and at that is running ahead of 14th place John McCain.
http://pajamasmedia.com/strawpoll2008/results.php
(places computed after merging datasets, using percentages.)
http://vote.presidentof2008.com/pastpolls.php
puts Clinton in third, with Dennis Kucinich getting the nod on the
Democratic side.
Might as well read tea leaves at this point; the real campaigning will
be more than a year from now. However, Clinton has a lot of baggage,
and even if she divorces Bill Clinton and marries Obama (not horribly
likely!), she won't be able to easily get rid of it.
A tough, capable woman from all accounts -- but very hobbled from her
association with Bill "I love interns" Clinton.
And Bush (either George or Jeb) is nowhere in the running. Perhaps
Jeb is lying low until the Republicans sort themselves out?
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Been there, done that, didn't get the T-shirt.
Hillary WILL be the LIB nominee
LIBs WILL vote for her and LIKE IT.
If Democrats put forth Hillary as their candidate, they are
insuring another Republican president. I'm surprised they'd want
that. It seems to me they'd rather put forth someone who could get
elected, and win the White House for their own party. But who can
figure people?
Obama: President
Hillary: Vice President
Hillary would make a fine fine fine foreign policy shapeshifter. A
woman, by proxi, is better able to handle the finer points of
human/political relationships with other nations.
Obama would heal the USA from inside/out. Fusing the people with hope
and making the timely alchemical adjustments of civil unbalance inside
the USA.
Hey... what better way to show the world that America is a
friendly/helpful sort of people. (snicker)
Coffee with Obama
And she'll LOSE.
Candidate Hillary is second only to the Anti-christ.
Why LIBs would promote her at ANY cost is only too clear.
All will feel the pain of the Widow/President Hillary.
Who are you to refuse to share of it?
Isn't this the village it take?
She has SUCH sights to show you.
Obama is second only to Zacharrias Moussouai,
again, it is only TOO clear why he would be the LIB choice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7h3GPc_yMCE
Foreign Policy:: Wumin, by proxi,
and the finer points only LIBs can appreciate.
Which is exactly what we need now, to continue the War on Terror and
spreading democracy across the world. Can't switch dead horses in
midstream, after all. (Can't really switch them *in* the stream,
either; they just sort of float there. But never mind.)
> I'm surprised they'd want that.
"They" who? The common people are probably quite fed
up with the Republican leadership, but that doesn't mean
"they" -- those really in charge -- do.
> It seems to me they'd rather put forth someone who could get
> elected, and win the White House for their own party. But who can
> figure people?
McCain for President. Because the draft will solve unemployment.
:-)
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Useless C++ Programming Idea #1123133:
void f(FILE * fptr, char *p) { fgets(p, sizeof(p), fptr); }
> Coffee in Madrid wrote
> > Al Smith wrote:
> >> > Hillary WILL be the LIB nominee
> >> > LIBs WILL vote for her and LIKE IT.
> >>
> >> If Democrats put forth Hillary as their candidate, they are
> >> insuring another Republican president. I'm surprised they'd want
> >> that. It seems to me they'd rather put forth someone who could get
> >> elected, and win the White House for their own party. But who can
> >> figure people?
> >
> > Obama: President
> > Hillary: Vice President
> >
> > Hillary would make a fine fine fine foreign policy shapeshifter. A
> > woman, by proxi, is better able to handle the finer points of
> > human/political relationships with other nations.
> >
> > Obama would heal the USA from inside/out....
>
>
> Obama is second only to Zacharrias Moussouai,
> again, it is only TOO clear why he would be the LIB choice.
wassamatter there Oboe dude. Obama not white enough for ya?
Coffee in Auschwitz Starbucks
"Al Smith" <inv...@address.com> wrote in message
news:dthEh.132767$Oa.42256@edtnps82...
One cannot be an adocate of individual rights and be a racist.
Racism, pure and simple is a quest for the unearned. period.
Obama, madrassa student or not, like any typical LIB
not only sponsors our Adversaries but
actively defends them as well.
Hillary in the face of uncompromising evil
will enact a policy of unilateral capitulation.
The consequence of her actions will be a world with
cities ablaze and bodies littering the streets.
LIBs know this, they know America will NOT be defeated by it
enemies but by those who's job it is to protect it
which is why the farcical candidacy of Clinton
continues to be foisted before their ranks
despite their obvious protests.
Why not cut out the middle man? Vote SOROS.
“If truth be known, I carried some rather potent
messianic fantasies with me from childhood, which
I felt I had to control, otherwise they might get me in trouble,”
-- George Soros.
I believe in evil and I think that there
are evil people in the world.
-- Hillary'93
---
LIB's plead for a Morality which holds COMPROMISE as it's standard of
Value, making it possible to judge Virtue on the basis of the number of
Values which one is willing to Betray.
Actually, the charge of racism is a code word for "we want what we
cannot earn". A true egalitarian cannot be racist, by definition;
all measurements are by achievements.
Bush:
- stopped Saddam
- upgraded the military
- is on the verge of stopping N. Korea and Iran
- is on the verge of stopping terrorism
- fixed the economy after Clinton's major damage thereto in late 1999
- reduced taxes for everybody
- reduced the minimum wage, allowing businesses to prosper
- reformed bankruptcy laws
- is researching the H2 economy
Clinton (Bill):
- uh, got his thing sucked
- impeached, but not removed
- bombed Bosnia
- allegedly executed VInce Foster and about 50 other people
- while he did have a surplus in late 1999, the economy porpoised
- allowed foreign dignitaries to walk all over him
Clinton (Hillary):
- first-term senator
Al Gore:
- uh, made a movie
- ran for President in 2000 and lost
Obama:
- ???!?
Now, who has the best qualifications for President?
Bush.
Who is most likely to be elected?
Absent repeal of Amendment 22, almost certainly not Bush.
This is a screwed-up system, ain't it?
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Useless C++ Programming Idea #8830129:
std::set<...> v; for(..:iterator i = v.begin(); i != v.end(); i++)
if(*i == thing) {...}
--
Regime change, yeah... but no WMD (the "clear and present danger to USA).
> - upgraded the military
But, of course.
> - is on the verge of stopping N. Korea and Iran
So that USrael can dominate Asia and the Meddle East.
> - is on the verge of stopping terrorism
LOL!
> - fixed the economy after Clinton's major damage thereto in late 1999
tax break... woo hoo... used-car-salesmen tactics.
> - reduced taxes for everybody
As above... bought people with money and got rich as halliburton oil
nazis.
> - reduced the minimum wage, allowing businesses to prosper
Big business prospered... while middle/lower America failed. The "blood"
of the USA.
> - reformed bankruptcy laws
He should have included America in the bankruptcy list. Billions of
dollars missing in Baghdad.
> - is researching the H2 economy
Yet another example of Bush in the Oval Office with his cowboy boots on
the table smirking.
Bush inertia... 2 more years... Nothing Accomplished!!!
Enjoy your Bush created 'recession'.
Sell.
Coffee with Albert Gore
> Hillary's qualifications to deal with Evil Men.
Yet another example of Bush in the Oval Office with his cowboy boots on
the table smirking.
Bush inertia... 2 more years... NOTHING ACCOMPLISHED!!!
Enjoy your Bush-created 'recession'.
Sell.
Coffee with Herr Bu$hschneider
That smirk is the idea you just gave him,
perhaps we-SHOULD send Clinton to our Adversaries,
to scrub their toilets in exchange for lasting Peace...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7h3GPc_yMCE
Why would Clinton not LEAP at the opportunity to do his part?
---
LIB's plead for a Morality which holds COMPROMISE as it's standard of
Value, making it possible to judge Virtue on the basis of the number of
Values which one is willing to Betray, why would they HESTITATE to betray
BOTH Clinton-themselves in return for the betrayal they have bestowed upon
their entire constituency.
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/114328.jpg
If Elephant dung is Art, why not this?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/459846.stm
Hillary steps into dung art row
They were...um...invisible. (Hey, it worked for Bill Cosby. :-) )
>
>> - upgraded the military
>
> But, of course.
>
>> - is on the verge of stopping N. Korea and Iran
>
> So that USrael can dominate Asia and the Meddle East.
Well, yeah.
>
>> - is on the verge of stopping terrorism
>
> LOL!
Bush And Cheney. Still On The Verge Of Stopping Terrorism After All
These Years.
>
>> - fixed the economy after Clinton's major damage thereto in late 1999
>
> tax break... woo hoo... used-car-salesmen tactics.
One wonders.
>
>> - reduced taxes for everybody
>
> As above... bought people with money and got rich as halliburton oil
> nazis.
$10B/quarter. Looks great on one's bottom line (unlike some
of the dresses at the Academy Awards :-) ).
>
>> - reduced the minimum wage, allowing businesses to prosper
>
> Big business prospered... while middle/lower America failed. The "blood"
> of the USA.
Hasn't failed quite yet, but the middle class is dwindling.
Either they're being pushed into the higher income brackets,
or ... well, you get the picture.
>
>> - reformed bankruptcy laws
>
> He should have included America in the bankruptcy list. Billions of
> dollars missing in Baghdad.
>
>> - is researching the H2 economy
>
> Yet another example of Bush in the Oval Office with his cowboy boots on
> the table smirking.
One wonders here too.
>
> Bush inertia... 2 more years... Nothing Accomplished!!!
>
> Enjoy your Bush created 'recession'.
>
> Sell.
>
>
> Coffee with Albert Gore
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
Windows. Multi-platform(1), multi-tasking(1), multi-user(1).
(1) if one defines "multi" as "exactly one".
> Why would Clinton not LEAP at the opportunity to do his part?
Hillary will be sweeping the intestinal colostic remains of Cheney off
the white house steps.
Coffee in an Afghani Ambulance