How Does One Get Trapped by Institutions Which Enslave Them?
Raymond Karczewski
1, You Support It!
2. You Resist It!
3. Sounds like "Damned if you Do and Damned if you Don't?
How does it sound to you?
A Better question is How Does One previously Trapped by Institutions
which Enslave them, FREE THEMSELVES?
Do not SUPPORT Evil. Do not RESIST Evil.
BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT IT~
Let Millions Walk away from Corporate governments/satanic worldly
religions with their previous supportive/resisting energy INTACT and
the machinery of the ILLUSORY INSTITUTIONS GRINDS TO A HALT!.
. . . and the meek shall Inherit the Earth.
Raymond Ronald KarczewskiŠ
*********************************************
"No other man in the recorded History of mankind
including JESUS CHRIST has directly revealed to
the World the SATANIC WEAPON used to enslave mankind
-- INTELLECTUAL THOUGHT!!"
Raymond Ronald KarczewskiŠ http://www.arkenterprises.com
Big Red Jeff Rubard
> How Does One Get Trapped by Institutions Which Enslave Them?
>
> 1, You Support It!
>
> 2. You Resist It!
>
> 3. Sounds like "Damned if you Do and Damned if you Don't?
> How does it sound to you?
>
> A Better question is How Does One previously Trapped by Institutions
> which Enslave them, FREE THEMSELVES?
>
> Do not SUPPORT Evil. Do not RESIST Evil.
>
> BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT IT~
>
> Let Millions Walk away from Corporate governments/satanic worldly
> religions with their previous supportive/resisting energy INTACT and
> the machinery of the ILLUSORY INSTITUTIONS GRINDS TO A HALT!.
>
> . . . and the meek shall Inherit the Earth.
>
> *********************************************
> "No other man in the recorded History of mankind
> including JESUS CHRIST has directly revealed to
> the World the SATANIC WEAPON used to enslave mankind
> -- INTELLECTUAL THOUGHT!!"
>
Hmm.
liberal
>
> Apparently IQ is a *bad* thing. Only true-believing
> morons have a shot at goodness.
Ummmm, yeah. Like believing teabaggettes offer the solution to
America's problems.
Odd that the teabaggettes, forty years ago, opposed civil rights
legislation.
liberal
> realization that a new path is necessary, is the
> first step.
And Germany thought the Nazi party was a new path.
> The T's represent that step. They will
> be replaced by others, more focused, more capable,
> with more of a plan. But first you have to grasp
> that the status-quo is the #1 problem, the proven
> road to ruin.
Really????? Describe that plan......
Problem is, you don't have a sufficient grasp on reality in order to
see the real "problems."
>
> >Odd that the teabaggettes, forty years ago, opposed civil rights
> >legislation.
>
> Which ones, the 'liberal' ones or the 'conservatives' ones ?
"Liberal" teabaggettes??????? WHAT.....ARE.....YOU......SMOKIN', boy?
>
> And was the problem CR legislation per-se, or just the way
> the proposed legislation was worded, how it was to be enforced ?
> Strictly speaking, it wasn't necessary - there was already
> enough in the constitution to void the concept of 'fractional
> people' and 'seperate but equal' if the point had been pressed.-
Explain, then, the anger over CR. You can't see the self-contradiction
in your argument?
You reichtards hated the Warren court for their decisions (see:
"Impeach Earl Warren")....the origins of judical activism... and you
have the gall to implicitedly argue the courts should have simply
ordered compliance with the Constitution? Especially when reichtards
(example: Bill Buckley) argued the Constitution allowed discrimination.
liberal
> liberal <liberalh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 1, 10:10 pm, Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
> >> liberal <liberalh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Aug 31, 10:52 pm, Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
> >> >> Big Red Jeff Rubard <friendlydogbanglesnsociali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >On Aug 28, 6:13 am, arke...@frontier.com (Raymond Karczewski) wrote:
> >> >> >> *********************************************
> >> >> >> "No other man in the recorded History of mankind
> >> >> >> including JESUS CHRIST has directly revealed to
> >> >> >> the World the SATANIC WEAPON used to enslave mankind
> >> >> >> -- INTELLECTUAL THOUGHT!!"
>
> >> >> >> Raymond Ronald Karczewski©http://www.arkenterprises.com
>
> >> >> >Hmm.
>
> >> >> Yea ... hmm ......
>
> >> >> Apparently IQ is a *bad* thing. Only true-believing
> >> >> morons have a shot at goodness.
>
> >> >Ummmm, yeah. Like believing teabaggettes offer the solution to
> >> >America's problems.
>
> >> Actually, to even TRY at a solution, a large-scale
> >> realization that a new path is necessary, is the
> >> first step.
>
> >And Germany thought the Nazi party was a new path.
>
> As the depression deepens, as hope is lost, the
> people will look for a "strong leader" who makes
> the right promises, blames the right scapegoats.
>
> So .... be prepared to 'heil' - or else.
>
> >> The T's represent that step. They will
> >> be replaced by others, more focused, more capable,
> >> with more of a plan. But first you have to grasp
> >> that the status-quo is the #1 problem, the proven
> >> road to ruin.
>
> >Really????? Describe that plan......
>
Yeah...sounds like a plan...kinda like: "Jump! Don't ask annoying
questions like if it's 'off a cliff.'"
>
> >Problem is, you don't have a sufficient grasp on reality in order to
> >see the real "problems."
>
> What corrupt socialist-totalitarians and/or corrupt
> fascist-totalitarians ?
>
> Yea, I see the problem .........
>
> So do many others now.
>
> >> >Odd that the teabaggettes, forty years ago, opposed civil rights
> >> >legislation.
>
> >> Which ones, the 'liberal' ones or the 'conservatives' ones ?
>
> >"Liberal" teabaggettes??????? WHAT.....ARE.....YOU......SMOKIN', boy?
>
> Not YOUR "liberal" dumb-ass ... what a bastardization
> of the term ! Not a damned thing "liberal" about modern
> "liberals" ........... for SHAME !!!
You corrupt the term "liberal" and expect everyone to buy into your
delusions. Up yours.
If the United States were still an 18th century agrarian society,
existing on a continent where the indigenous population has been
reduced to 10% of its previous size by epidemics (see: Measles, for
example) thereby freeing up huge tracts of land to be taken by force
from a now powerless population, the 18th century definition of
"liberal" might apply.
OTOH, please show how your definition of conservative actually differs
from a 18th century plantation owner's philosophy.
>
> >> And was the problem CR legislation per-se, or just the way
> >> the proposed legislation was worded, how it was to be enforced ?
> >> Strictly speaking, it wasn't necessary - there was already
> >> enough in the constitution to void the concept of 'fractional
> >> people' and 'seperate but equal' if the point had been pressed.-
>
> >Explain, then, the anger over CR. You can't see the self-contradiction
> >in your argument?
>
> Anger ? What are YOU smokin' ... Al Sharptons turds ?
>
> Stereotypes have consumed your mind.
Nahhh. I think for myself. Try explaining how you differ from (say)
George Wallace (pre-epiphany).
>
> >You reichtards hated the Warren court for their decisions
>
> Kinda crappy decisions actually ...
Well, there you go. Like I said.
Implicitly suggesting all we need is to do is look at the
Constitution, then whining their upholding of Constitutional
provisions were "crappy." Sayyyy, why don't you explain what a "non-
crappy" decision would sound like (this oughta be good)?
>
> But, as I said, there were OTHER paths to
> de-facto anti-racism. The Warren court just
> ignored them ... decided to legislate from
> the bench. Nasty. Un-democratic.-
List the legislation the court came up with.......
