Conspiracy theories are sweeping the Left's major outlets

[Leroy N. Soetoro]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/conspiracy-theories-are-
sweeping-the-lefts-major-outlets

There is an imperfect symmetry between the Left and the Right in America
today. Here's an image I would use to understand it:

Imagine the various political players (mainstream journalists,
politicians, cranks, commentators) all lined up by job, half on the Left,
half on the Right.

Then imagine running down the middle, between the Left and the Right, is a
plate of glass that isn’t uniform and flat, but instead distorts what one
sees across the aisle. It doesn’t merely make the other side look scarier,
but it also bends the light so that when you look straight across to see
your counterpart, you see somebody other than the person directly across
from you. You see as your counterpart someone who is further up or down
the line, playing a different role than you are.

Two effects of this distortion that I’ve noticed over the past 15 years:

1) The Right’s politicians look at their counterparts, and instead of
seeing the Left’s politicians, they see the Left’s media.

2) The crankiest and nastiest and most conspiracy-theory dealing
commentators on the Left dwell among their experts, mainstream
commentators, and reporters, but their cranky counterparts on the Right
are the fringe commentators.

How do these distortions manifest themselves? Former President Donald
Trump is the clearest demonstration of Rule 1: He saw himself not
primarily as taking on Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden, but as taking on CNN
and the New York Times. This wasn’t Trump’s little personal obsession;
this was why he won.

Millions of people (at first the working-class whites in middle America
and later all sorts of conservatives) saw that the major news media hated,
mocked, or at best ignored them, and so they hired a guy to punch CNN in
the face.

(Also, I think this rule might explain why conservatives feel like we are
losing the culture war while we win in court and politics very often. The
news media are unanimous that we all have to ‘Bake the Cake,’ and so our
politicians try to make the Left ‘Bake the Cake,’ even though Hobby Lobby
and the Colorado cakemaker won in court.)

Rule 2 is what I learned in the 2010s, when I noticed how nasty and
partisan a New York Times columnist conducted himself. Instead, in his
participation in the political scrum, Paul Krugman seemed to see himself
as the counterpart of Rush Limbaugh. Name-calling was common, and debating
with zero charity whatsoever was his game. He scoffed at the idea of
comity or graciousness and imputed bad motives as a habit.

Conservative New York Times columnists Ross Douthat or David Brooks never
behaved that way. Conservative or libertarian economists Milton Friedman,
Thomas Sowell, or Tyler Cowen never behaved that way. But when Krugman
looked across the aisle, through the fun-house lens, he didn't see other
economists or top-tier columnists. He saw Rush Limbaugh, and so he behaved
as if that was his counterpart.

Increasingly the liberal media has a similarly distorted idea of their
role, and it could be based on this fun-house effect.

Two Washington Post columnists this week published completely ungrounded
conspiracy theories on hot-button topics. On Tuesday night, contributing
columnist Brian Broome argued that the pro-life movement and the Supreme
Court majority were merely pretending to oppose abortion while secretly
wanting only to boost white birthrates for the sake of perpetuating total
dominance of the white race. That is literally his entire explanation for
all opposition to abortion. It makes no sense at all, and it relies on
demonizing millions of people and claiming to read their minds.

This sort of racist conspiracy theory appears in the dark corners of the
American Right. But conservative columnists in major newspapers don’t
write this sort of thing.

Next came Taylor Lorenz. Lorenz was a New York Times “tech reporter,”
which is a beat dominated by liberals who hate conservatives and typically
want them censored or at least deplatformed. She is now a liberal
columnist at the Washington Post where she writes — you guessed it —
partisan conspiracy theories aimed at convincing readers that the ordinary
parts of the Right are very dangerous.

In her piece about the Biden administration folding its planned
disinformation board, Lorenz repeatedly mentions a “coordinated” attack on
the woman nominated to run it, Nina Jankowicz. Lorenz’s column offers zero
evidence of “coordination,” which makes her claims, literally, a
conspiracy theory. In order to leave the impression that it must have been
a coordinated disinformation operation to bring down Jankowicz, Lorenz
omitted all the relevant reasons that a disinformation board run by
Jankowicz was considered a horrible idea. For starters, Jankowicz is a
Democrat who regularly fell for Democratic disinformation and false
Democratic claims of Republican disinformation.

Do conservatives peddle unfounded conspiracy theories to protect their
guys? Yes! Lots of it. Sidney Powell, Alex Jones, and Gateway Pundit make
a living off of that. It’s part of the asymmetry of our politics that
their counterparts write columns for the Left’s leading opinion page.



--
"LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
recover with no after effects.

No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
ballots. Report voter fraud: sf.n...@mail.house.gov

Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
fiasco, President Trump.

Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
queer liberal democrat donors.

President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed
dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.