Pioneer Little Europe & The "Racial Purity" Question
Haman
set up a single piece of property like the Aryan Nations or the United
Klans of America for our Pioneer Little Europes, instead of so
aggressively taking this show about 'Stormfronts of the street' (PLE)
into town?[/b]
Answer: The important thing to notice about both of those compound
communities, is that as soon as any of their supporters were alleged
to have violated the civil rights of others and were found liable in a
civil law suit, that each community's property was absorbed by their
opponents. That's the old way to do things, and exposing one easy to
find owner and his assets to all the liability is obsolete.
[b]Question: OK, well if we take the show into town and use the
confused liability strategy that all the other political/cultural/
lifestyle communities are using, because it's a legal nightmare to
track the doings of a real community due to the constant criss-
crossing of those involved, will we be able to require all those
moving into the target area to sign a covenant of racial purity?[/b]
Answer: No, on the open streets that would still be a violation of the
federal laws which prohibit racial discrimination in housing ( Ref:
Federal Fair Housing Act codified at 42 U.S.C. 3601-3619, penalties
for violation at 42 U.S.C. 3631). Instead, what is advocated in PLE
organizing is the same tactic that the Chinese, gays, and Blacks
employ to cause a "purity effect" in their communities.
And the Chinese are probably the most successful example of those
three to emulate. Essentially what this calls for is the concentration
of so many conscious supporters (White Nationalists, not ordinary
Whites) that the neighbors freely decide that the new culture is
intolerable (There goes the neighborhood, Mary, it's time to pack the
bags). The PLE phrase for this is "The Uncontrolled White Nationalist
Culture" (though we all actually influence it) and this will work for
us just as it does for all those who are presently displacing the
existing type of White community.
[b]Question: Yes, but back to this question of maintaining our
community integrity, or as some may express it, our purity. There are
essentially two types of Stormfronters, those who can prove pure
European ancestory and many American Whites who may have a dash of
Indian to them or some other not so obvious complication. What is the
PLE recommendation for dealing with them?[/b]
Answer: Again, keep in mind the federal civil rights limitations here,
but there's also a way to stabilize that situation for ourselves: Yes,
there are many White Nationalists who either won't or can't actually
participate in any kind of a purity program, and yes, there are also
many purists who want to take it even to the level of promoting only
Nordicism, but there is no reason for these to clash. Keep in mind
that all Stormfronters want ethnic integrity, and are willing to
cooperate where they can to sustain it, so the recommendation is that
they simply network with the local people they're most comfortable
with, without disturbing any others. This is the two pronged approach.
[b]Question: You'v stirred up quite a storm before to provoke some
dialogue about how the Stormfronters hold different views on this, so
what do you think is going to happen when the "pioneers" meet the
"Europeans" in a PLE?[/b]
Answer: Every Stormfronter has their own spin on how to handle this
particular race question, and some aren't too diplolmatic, but mine is
shaped by three factors. First there is the reality of the condition
of many White Americans; then there are the federal laws on housing;
and finally there's the opportunity to turn what has long been a
collapsing situation into something more progressive.
Yes, there are critics, and they must be allowed to make proposals
here or in any PLE as well, but this two pronged approach is what I
propose for dealing with it. A PLE will be our raw engine of power,
with all kinds of different supporters, and the purists will be
encouraged to go among them with their competing proposals for
mainaining our integrity without costing us supporters.
[b]Question: It's legal, and sounds like it would work, but what do
you say to those who protest that they don't want this kind of system?
[/b]
Answer: The existing type of White community, and even the impotent
cults which identify with it, tend to offer us only non-camaraderie,
non-community, and the present powerlessness. Also, I think it's
important to observe, many who are still not won over to this proposal
tend to provide not only no alternative but no criticism whatsover
about the more pronounced segregation systems of close proximity that
once existed in the deep South and South Africa. Why shouldn't they
embrace PLE, then, as it would meet our race's needs with participants
who share a common goal?
I believe the polarized camps can work together within a PLE, and so
do many others. Anything else isn't even on the horizon. In this
manner we could take the country, as it enables all pro-White people
to promote ethnic integrity. And the more widespread that the PLE idea
comes, the more living space and social space we'll have to work with.