We Should Crack Down On Muslims Because of Hasan, Then We Need To Get The Irish American Catholics Because Of What Tim McVeigh Did - Sean Hannity as Told To Bill O'Reilly
Vince
the irishman is drunk half the time.
McVeigh killed hundreds and Hasan killed a dozen. Proof that Irish Catholics
and Muslims are the enemies of America.
No more terrorism. Cut the weed off at the root.
Patriot Games
>The only difference between a muslim terrorist and an irish terrorist is that
>the irishman is drunk half the time.
>McVeigh killed hundreds and Hasan killed a dozen. Proof that Irish Catholics
>and Muslims are the enemies of America.
Oops! Is it our fault you're stupid?
McVeigh was born in America, he was not Irish.
McVeigh was NOT a practicing Catholic, Hasan WAS a practicing Scuzzy
Muzzy.
>No more terrorism. Cut the weed off at the root.
Agreed. Deport or exterminate ALL Muslims in America!
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:14:17 -0500, Vince <vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >The only difference between a muslim terrorist and an irish terrorist is that
> >the irishman is drunk half the time.
> >McVeigh killed hundreds and Hasan killed a dozen. Proof that Irish Catholics
> >and Muslims are the enemies of America.
>
> Oops! Is it our fault you're stupid?
>
> McVeigh was born in America, he was not Irish.
Hasan was born in America.
>
> McVeigh was NOT a practicing Catholic,
No cite. Obvious lie.
plainolamerican
We Should Crack Down On Muslims Because of Hasan, Then We Need To Get
The Irish American Catholics Because Of What Tim McVeigh Did - Sean
Hannity as Told To Bill O'Reilly
---
has anybody told you what an idiot you are?
robert bowman
>>
>> McVeigh was NOT a practicing Catholic,
>
>
> No cite. Obvious lie.
>
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,109478,00.html
"I was raised Catholic. I was confirmed Catholic (received the sacrament of
confirmation). Through my military years, I sort of lost touch with the
religion. I never really picked it up, however I do maintain core beliefs."
Topaz
Today let's talk about some of the things that have changed in America
since September 11. I'm not thinking about all of the new rigamarole
at airports. I'm more interested in the changes in the Politically
Correct party line laid down for the lemmings by the media. I'm
interested in changes in the way Americans view the world. And I'm
interested in the changed prospects for the future of America.
The most interesting thing about the new party line is its stupidity.
The Jews were caught by surprise last month, and they had to whip up
something in a hurry in order to deflect blame from Israel and from
the U.S. government's support for Israel. Apparently the best they
could do on a moment's notice is the explanation that Osama bin Laden
attacked us simply because he hates our freedom and democracy. Since
they first cooked up that explanation they've refined it quite a bit.
Both the Foreign Ministry in Israel and the American Israel Public
Affairs Committee, Israel's enormously powerful lobby in Washington,
have been circulating "talking papers" to their own people, to
politicians, and to everyone else who is likely to be making a public
statement about America's new war or about Washington's past policy in
the Middle East.
These "talking papers" tell people how to counter what the Jews call
Osama bin Laden's "lies" and also how to respond to anyone who
suggests that our government's support of Israel might have had
something to do with the September 11 attack. The papers warn people
never to raise this subject, but if someone else insists on talking
about it, it is to be countered with the explanation that support for
Israel had nothing at all to do with the attack, that we would have
been attacked even if we weren't supporting Israel, and that the only
reason for the attack is Osama bin Laden's irrational hatred of
America's freedom and democracy.
I believe that it's clear that many people actually believe this
nonsense, judging by the number of cars with red, white, and blue
ribbons tied to their antennas. But these are the people who believe
everything Tom Brokaw or their beloved Big Brother in the White House
tells them. If George Bush came on TV and told them with that
mock-solemn expression of his that a Martian invasion force had just
landed, that the Martians were demanding one million sacrificial
virgins as their price for not destroying Hollywood and Washington,
and that U.S. Army troops would be going door to door to collect
virgins, the folks with the ribbons on their antennas would believe
it, and they would prepare to hand over any virgins in their
households. They would consider it their patriotic duty. The party
line may change from time to time, but lemmings never change.
Well, the lemmings may believe that U.S. support for Israel had
nothing to do with the September 11 attack or with the anthrax-laden
letters now going around, but no one else believes it. Last week the
media bosses were kicking themselves because they had let the text of
a statement Osama bin Laden had made be published in the United
States. They said that they had made a mistake in putting this
statement before the American public. They wouldn't publish any
further Osama bin Laden statements, they said, because the statements
might contain secret instructions for his operatives.
Everyone I've spoken with laughed at that excuse. In his last
statement Osama bin Laden said that Americans would not be secure and
would have no peace of mind as long as Palestinians were not secure in
their own land. That's the sort of powerful and simple message that
even Sally Soccer Mom and Joe Sixpack might understand, and that's
what the Jewish media bosses don't want the public to hear. They're
not worried about secret instructions; they're worried about the
lemmings figuring out what's going on.
Actually, I think there's very little danger of that. And really, the
changes I'm more interested in are in the outlook of the minority of
the population able to think for itself: the minority that doesn't
believe whatever Tom Brokaw says. You know, I've been talking to this
minority for years-decades, actually-warning them about the
consequences of letting their government get out of control, warning
them of the consequences of permitting the Jews of Hollywood and New
York to run our country through their control of our mass media,
warning them of the consequences of continuing to sit on their hands
and keep their mouths shut from fear of being denounced by the media
as "anti-Semites" or "racists."
And I wasn't having as much success as I wanted at getting them to pay
attention and change their ways. Many of those who listened wouldn't
do anything because what I was warning them about didn't seem quite
real. Despite all the changes they could see around them-the
deterioration of our cities and our schools, the darkening of the
racial complexion of America, the trashing of our culture by the mass
media, the increasingly obvious efforts of the Jewish media bosses to
persuade our young women that they should bed down with
non-Whites-despite everything, they themselves managed to remain
comfortable and economically secure, so the things I was warning them
about didn't seem quite real. They had convinced themselves that they
were above it all, that they could continue to watch the destruction
of their country and their people all around them, and it would never
affect them personally: that they could remain secure and comfortable
while everything around them went to hell.
Osama bin Laden jolted some of them awake on September 11: some of
those whose attention I hadn't been able to catch with my own
warnings. He convinced some of them that what they had been observing
going on around them for years was in fact real: that continuing to
ignore the degenerative processes promoted by the media and the
government and hoping for the best really wasn't a good strategy for
personal survival. In particular, he convinced many members of the
thinking minority that losing control of our government really is a
serious matter, that permitting our government to be used by the Jews
against their neighbors in the Middle East- and also against the
genuine interests of the American people- could have real consequences
at home.
I have the feeling that many of these thinking people are paying at
least a little more attention now to the things we've been talking
about here every week. The fact that the number of people who download
these broadcasts from my Web site each Saturday has nearly doubled
since September 11 is a pretty good indication of this, I believe.
Just as I'm getting more hate mail from the red-white-and-blue-ribbon
types, I'm also getting more thoughtful responses from the people who
understand and care. Which is to say, I think I have an audience now
that not only is bigger but also is more attentive and responsive.
That is really important.
I'm not discouraged by the fact that the attentive and responsive
people still constitute only a minority of a minority. I'm encouraged
by the fact that the attentive people now make up a larger minority of
the thinking portion of the population than they did before September
11. Important things always are done by minorities. Majorities don't
make decisions; individuals do; small minorities do. History is made
by active minorities. Sometimes an active minority may use the passive
majority as a tool or a weapon, but the minority always acts in accord
with its own will.
What's important is which minority is making the decisions, which
minority is active at any particular moment. For at least the past 60
years it's been the wrong minority, an alien minority that is
implacably hostile to our people. If we are to survive, that must
change. Our minority must become active instead. Our minority must
grow to include more of the thinking portion of our population. And
that is happening now. That's been happening since September 11.
The people who understand and care have been forced to begin paying
attention. I have a very strong premonition that there will be other
things in the reasonably near future that will make them pay even
closer attention.
The Bush government, just like the Clinton government before it,
thinks that it can stop terrorism with cruise missiles and smart
bombs. But just think for a moment: whether Osama bin Laden survives
the Bush government's current war against Israel's enemies in the
Middle East or not, he already has become immortal. In the eyes of
Muslims he has been elevated to a status in heaven alongside Mohammed.
His name will be praised, and stories will be told about him around
campfires throughout the Muslim world for countless generations to
come, long after the Bush government has gone and been forgotten.
Cruise missiles can't take Osama bin Laden's immortality away from
him. There's nothing the Bush government can do to diminish his glory
in the Muslim world. In fact, the more cruise missiles and smart bombs
the United States unleashes on the Muslim world, the higher will Osama
bin Laden's esteem rise; the more will his strike against the United
States seem justified to his fellow Muslims.
Don't be fooled by the tame "house Muslims" the media bosses have been
trotting out to explain to the lemmings that violence is abhorrent to
"real Muslims." The real Muslims are the ones rioting against the
government in Pakistan now. The real Muslims are the ones singing
Osama bin Laden's praises now. And there will be no shortage of other
young Muslims lusting for a share in his glory, lusting to have their
praises sung around campfires too. Cruise missiles don't frighten
them. There are enough of them already in this country to keep things
jumping, thanks to the government's insane immigration policy of
recent decades.
At the University of California in Los Angeles a library worker,
53-year-old Jonnie Hargis, has been suspended without pay because he
sent out an e-mail letter criticizing U.S. support for Israel's
aggression. The university administration explained that it has a
policy against using university computers for political messages, but
Hargis, who has worked at the UCLA library for 22 years, pointed out
that no one who has been sending out pro-Israel and pro-war messages
has been punished.
There are similar situations at other universities around the country.
Jews and neo-conservatives post belligerent, bloodthirsty messages
calling for the annihilation of all of the Jews' enemies in the Middle
East, including Iraq and Iran as well as Afghanistan. Anyone who calls
instead for eliminating the cause of the September 11 attack- that is,
for stopping the blind support by the U.S. government of Israel's
aggression- is censured and threatened with expulsion or with being
fired.
There are still people around who can remember how it was at our
universities during the Vietnam war. That was when treason ruled on
campuses. Students burned their draft cards and put up Viet Cong flags
and posters of Ho Chi Minh in their dormitories. Jewish activists in
groups such as Students for a Democratic Society organized pro-Viet
Cong rallies on campuses. Professors encouraged this activity, and
administrators didn't interfere, citing free speech.
The switch to red, white, and blue ribbons and saluting the flag came
rather suddenly last month, and a lot of thinking people understand
why it came. They understand that it is when America is involved in a
war to promote Jewish interests that pledging allegiance to the flag
suddenly is declared fashionable. When Israel's welfare is threatened,
Jews, ordinarily noted for their cynicism and irreverence, suddenly
put their hands over their hearts and begin singing The Star-Spangled
Banner, and they glare at anyone who isn't singing loudly enough. And
people who make the mistake of asking why get fired or suspended. But
you know, firing people or suspending people who have dissenting
opinions doesn't go down well with the independent thinkers. And I'll
guarantee you:
there will be a lot more dissent before this war is over. And the
Jewish media won't be able to hide it all.
What we are beginning to see now is a sharpening division between the
Jews, their bought politicians, and the "I pledge allegiance,"
authoritarian types on one side, and everyone else on the other side.
We also saw a division, along different lines, during the Vietnam war,
with the authoritarians and the Jews on opposite sides instead of the
same side. I believe that the division this time will develop faster
and become sharper.
I don't know how the war itself will develop. It was clear before it
began that the U.S. military machine is quite capable of flattening
Afghanistan or any other Third World country without suffering any
significant losses to its own personnel, simply because we can hit
them from a distance with a great deal of destructive power, and they
don't have the means to hit back-except through what we call
"terrorism." It is certain that there will be more terrorism,
although, of course, I cannot predict the form it will take or its
magnitude.
I can predict, however, that the media and the politicians will
denounce it as "cowardly" and will act as if America has been wronged:
that whatever form the next blow against America takes and wherever it
comes from, it will be declared "unprovoked." And I can predict that
the polls published by the media will continue to show nearly every
American wildly enthusiastic about the war, even as the opposition to
the war grows.
One interesting thing about the opposition this time is that it is
growing both among the Gentile Left and among genuine patriots. During
the Vietnam war the members of the Gentile Left all were on the Jewish
side. Despite the current agreement between leftists and patriots on
the single issue of ending support for Israel and limiting the war in
the Middle East, I don't see much chance of real collaboration between
these two elements.
The Gentile Left is still hopelessly confused on such essential
issues as race and feminism and homosexuality and permissiveness. But
the war is indeed driving a wedge between Jews and Gentile leftists-a
deeper wedge than that driven by the development of Jewish
neo-conservatism after the Vietnam war, and for that we should be
thankful.
There may be other hopeful developments as well. The assassination in
Jerusalem this week of one of Israel's most bloodthirsty Jewish
militants by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
certainly was a welcome move. Until now all of the assassins have been
Jews, and all of the victims have been Palestinians. It's too soon to
know whether or not this one act of retribution against the Israeli
leadership will be followed by other successful blows, but it may be
that the events of recent weeks have emboldened the Palestinians to
act with more imagination and enterprise than before.
Looking ahead a bit, there are several signs of hope here on our own
home front. The heightened sense of reality among non-lemmings, the
lessening of their sense of detachment, the stronger realization that
they cannot survive by continuing to sit on their hands and watch the
Jews destroy the world around them- this is the single most important
consequence of recent events. This, together with the growing
alienation between Gentile leftists and Jews, leaves the Jews in a
weaker position than they have been in a long time. They will crack
their whips more frantically than before, trying to keep everyone in
line, but the principal effect of that will be to generate even more
resentment against them.
Things are a bit brittle now. A few dozen more anthrax cases, another
truck bomb in a well chosen location, and substantial changes could
take place in a hurry: a stock market panic, martial law measures by
the Bush government, and a sharpening of the debate as to how we got
ourselves get into this mess in the first place. As the debate
sharpens, the Jews and their collaborators will pull out all of the
stops in an effort to stifle it, but I don't think that even a
declaration of martial law can stifle it now. Too many people already
smell the stink in Washington. Too many people already understand on
whose hands is the blood of 6,000 innocent Americans who died last
month. Too many people understand the true motivation behind the
current war against Israel's enemies in the Middle East. The genie is
out of the bottle now, and not even Mr. Bush's new anti-terrorism
agency-what does he call it? -- the Office of Homeland Security? --
not even this new Federal agency can put it back in the bottle.
It's a strange thing: in a novel I wrote more than 12 years ago - the
title is Hunter-I talked about the formation of a new anti-terrorism
agency, separate from the FBI. And I pointed out that the principal
aim of the new agency would not be to protect the public from
terrorism, but to protect the government from an increasingly restless
and disillusioned public: a sort of modern Praetorian Guard. I think
that we'll be seeing more developments in that direction in the next
few months, with the timing depending upon when the next surprise
comes and its magnitude.
Of course, I don't know what will happen next to shatter already
jangled nerves, but it is likely that something will happen. My advice
to responsible patriots now is this: Expect a surprise, and remain
calm when it comes. But don't wait for it to come to raise your voice.
Speak out now. Don't be intimidated by the mindless yahoos waving
their flags or by the government or by the media. If you point out
calmly and in a reasoned way who is responsible for what happened to
America last month you will have more people agreeing with you than
you might imagine. If you call for your fellow Americans to join you
in regaining control of their government, the response will be greater
than at any time in recent years.
Thanks for being with me again today.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
Patriot Games
Names" <old_r...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Nov 7, 3:04�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:14:17 -0500, Vince <vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >The only difference between a muslim terrorist and an irish terrorist is that
>> >the irishman is drunk half the time.
>> >McVeigh killed hundreds and Hasan killed a dozen. �Proof that Irish Catholics
>> >and Muslims are the enemies of America.
>> Oops! �Is it our fault you're stupid?
>> McVeigh was born in America, he was not Irish.
>Hasan was born in America.
I knew that, Old Hag.
>> McVeigh was NOT a practicing Catholic,
>No cite. Obvious lie.
Who is the Proven Liar? YOU...
Not me.
If YOU think McVeigh was a practicing Catholic then YOU MAY PROVE ME
WRONG BY CITING IT.
FAILURE TO CITE that McVeigh was a practicing Catholic IS PROOF THAT
YOU ARE THE LIAR.
Begin your CITE here: ____________
> Chaos <
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:14:17 -0500, Vince <vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >The only difference between a muslim terrorist and an irish terrorist is that
> >the irishman is drunk half the time.
> >McVeigh killed hundreds and Hasan killed a dozen. Proof that Irish Catholics
> >and Muslims are the enemies of America.
>
> Oops! Is it our fault you're stupid?
>
> McVeigh was born in America, he was not Irish.
You must be illiterate - The subject line says "Irish Americans"
>
> McVeigh was NOT a practicing Catholic
Cite!
>
> >No more terrorism. Cut the weed off at the root.
>
> Agreed. Deport or exterminate ALL Muslims in America!
We should start with white trash queers like you who have nothing else
to do with their empty lives but sit around the trailer all day and
post shit.