info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Tom Woods Show Elite podcast & Jeff Deist Human Action podcast & Mises Institute
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Edward Bellamy
Oct 31, 2022, 7:45:09 AM10/31/22
to
Tom Woods (a podcaster) used to be ignorant of the fact that Hitler et al did not describe their movement with the words “Nazi, Fascist, Third Reich, nor Swastika.” Woods would often display his ignorance in his public speaking. He didn’t know that Hitler’s ilk described themselves as “Socialist” (by the very word) in their voluminous speeches and writings.
Woods was schooled by Educational Outreach Programs (EOP) about discoveries from the noted historian Dr. Rex Curry’s archives. As far back as July 19, 2015 the EOP alerted Woods to his errors in Episode 446 entitled “No, Progressives, Capitalism Isn’t Fascism: Here’s What Nazi Germany’s Economy Looked Like.” The title displays Woods’ ignorant use of “Nazi Germany” and “Fascism” and is a prelude to the larger ignorance displayed by Woods within the episode. The EOP’s spokesperson Daniel Pose posted the following public correction to Woods:
“The doctrine of Hitler and his supporters was socialism. It was not "Fascism." They did not call themselves "Nazis" nor "Fascists." They called themselves socialists. http://rexcurry.net
German socialists were allies with Soviet socialists in a pact to divide up Europe, invading Poland together, spreading WWII, and leading to the socialist Wholecaust (of which the Holocaust was a part).
Hitler adopted the hooked-cross symbol to represent crossed "S" letters for "socialism" after it had been used as a symbol for socialism on the first paper ruble money under Soviet socialism (another astounding discovery by the historian Dr. Rex Curry).”
Woods was not happy to learn the “news.” Daniel Pose works with the “Rex Curry Foundation,” a philanthropic organization dedicated to helping the blind and the mentally handicapped. Woods didn’t give up his willful blindness, and he continued to repeat the same errors as the years went by.
Woods probably remains benighted in that he wishes Hitler HAD self-identified as “Nazi, Fascist, Third Reich, or Swastika.” He pushes the inconvenient truth from his mind. He wants to return to his earlier bliss of ignorance.
"The Political Corruption of Language" is the title of Tom Woods’ podcast episode 2212 (published in October 2022) with Jeff Deist as Tom’s guest. The episode shows that Tom Woods and Jeff Deist are ignorant of the fact that Hitler et al did call their movement "Fascist." Hitler and his ilk described their dogma as a "Socialist" (by the very word) in voluminous speeches and writings.
Of all the people in the world who should be fighting the misnomers, it should be Tom Woods and Jeff Deist. They need to stop helping the world's many "Liars For Socialism." The dynamic duo should stop perpetuating widespread ignorance.
The subject of the episode "the Political Corruption of Language" adds so much irony to the points made in the sentences that precede this one. Woods could not have picked a better title for that episode in regard to the word "Fascist" although the pair were both too ignorant to comprehend it. And oh, by the way, in case Tom and Jeff are curious, Hitler did not self-identify as a "Nazi" either (for future reference).
Tom takes offense if anyone objects to his misuse of “Fascist” and “Nazi.” He shows how the people who complain about "Fascist" and "Nazi" as "the political corruption of language" are the same people who overuse "Fascist" and "Nazi" (and they won't explain that Hitler described himself as "Socialist" and not with the words "Fascist" nor "Nazi" nor “Third Reich” nor “Swastika”).
Tom has a bizarre fixation about the word “Nazis.” And about “Fascist.” And about “Third Reich.” He overuses them too much. He needs to end his bizarre fixation on the misnomers. He should tell the truth. Be honest about what Hitler said.
It is a reminder that the people who complain that "Hitler ruined the swastika" are the same people who actually DID ruin the swastika (because they call Hitler's symbol a swastika even though Hitler DID NOT call his symbol a swastika; and Hitler probably did not even know the term "swastika"). Worse still, a tiny fraction of those people know better or have been so informed and they persist in the unqualified misuse of “Swastika” anyway.
Can anyone point to where Tom or Jeff ever stated anywhere that "Hitler did not self-identify as a Fascist" or "Hitler et al did not call themselves Nazis" or "Hitler described himself as 'socialist' by the very word in his voluminous speeches and writings"? If so, please point to it. If not, why not? What is wrong with them? Are they that "well-trained" (brainwashed?) by political correctness? They are in leadership roles to so many people.
Those are not the kind of people who are ever going to tell their audience that German socialism and Soviet socialism partnered to launch WWII, invading Poland together, and going onward from there in a secret conspiracy for INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM that resulted in millions of deaths.
The “Nazi” fixation that is routinely displayed by Woods and Deist is one reason why they both failed to make the astonishing discovery about Hitler's use of his notorious symbol (the discovery that was made by the famed historian Dr. Rex Curry). Woods and Deist could not see. All historians did not see. Can you not see?
The Tom Woods show focused on a published article by Jeff Deist: “Evolution or Corruption? The Imposition of Political Language in the West Today” Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XXIV, 2022, 2, pp. 55-74, ISSN: 1825-5167). Here is an excerpt that shows ignorance of Hitler’s lexicon:
“But the relentless campaign to label Trump as uniquely fascist or even a ‘Nazi’ was unprecedented and based almost entirely on his abrasive personal style rather than his action. Because political and media elites held such deep contempt for Trump as a populist outsider– the wrong kind of person– they did not hesitate to corrupt and wildly abuse a term normally associated with Hitler’s atrocities. ‘Fascism’ has become one of Orwell’s meaningless words.”
An informed writer could not publish that (in 20-pages of Deist’s article) without mentioning that Hitler did not call himself a "Nazi" and did not describe his dogma as "Fascism." The whole point of the article was to explain how misused the words were. The writer missed the best opportunity to do that. All the writer had to do was tell the truth. Hitler described himself as "SOCIALIST" voluminously and by the very word, repeatedly, and in painful detail, in his comprehensive career of speeches and writings.
Another possible problem is that Deist is so well-conditioned to repeat popular socialist lies that he is unaware of his own "brainwashing."
Deist's ignorance inured to his benefit: If he had explained Hitler's vocabulary then the "Learned Treatise" would not have published his written article. Hitler’s correct vocabulary is verboten. Deist's piece would never have seen the light of day if he had accurately related Hitler's lexicon. Amirite?
Deist and Woods won’t say that Hitler described his movement with the word “Socialist” and without the words “Nazi, Fascist, Third Reich, nor Swastika.” They have also never explained how the Pledge of Allegiance was the origin of the notorious stiff-armed salute used under Hitler and German socialism. They have also never explained how Hitler’s symbol was used to represent “S” letter shapes for “socialist.” What is going on here? It does not seem accidental.
Deist and Woods are not the only so-called “Conservative, Republican, Libertarian” types engaged in an ongoing cover-up. The subterfuge has a history with Lew Rockwell, Paul Gottfried, and many others. It does not seem like mere coincidence that those ideological communities remain so cohesively silent.
You've heard that "Marxist Academics" are teaching socialism to students in colleges, high schools, etc. New research indicates that the academics call themselves "Conservatives, Republicans, and Libertarians," and they are just too stupid to know that they repeat socialist BS to students.
About Hitler: Most academics constantly use the terms "Nazis" and "Nazi Party" and "Nazi Germany" and "Fascists" and Fascism" even though Hitler did not use those terms in his speeches about his Party. Students don't understand what Hitler and his ilk actually said: "SOCIALISM" (by the very word in voluminous speeches and writings). There was no "Nazi Party." Hitler did not give speeches about his "Nazi Party." There was no "Nazi Germany." Hitler did not give speeches about his "Nazi Germany." Most people speak the way all bad teachers speak: they do not understand how they spread ignorance and reinforce it. They cover up for socialism. They unwittingly assist "Liars For Socialism."
The following was a response to a person who had taught history (about Germany before and during WWII). He also wrote articles about the same topics.
You show that you completely fail to understand what I said. You said "your claim that I never discuss the socialism of Hitler is false. Likewise, Tom has had a number of episodes where he discusses the socialism in the Nazi Party and Hitler." I never claimed that you never discuss the socialism of Hitler. You utterly miss the point of all of this. If that weren't embarrassing enough you referred to the "Nazi Party and Hitler." There WAS NO NAZI PARTY. Don't you get it? You have confessed that you have been teaching classrooms full of students that Hitler's party was the "NAZI PARTY." Even if you tell them the "full" name in passing it is clear from your failure to understand the topic here that you let them pass your class thinking that Hitler also used the term "NAZI PARTY" (Hitler did not). Your post is so sad for what you unknowingly revealed. In order to attempt to rectify your comments to students you would have to say "Hitler always used the long version of his party name, or he would say "socialist party" or "National Socialist Party" and he would not say 'Nazi Party' as I have used casually here dear students as I don't want you to misunderstand." You don't "get it." and it is too late for all your students. You would literally have to constantly remind students that even though you keep referring to Hitler's party as the "Nazi Party" THAT IS NOT WHAT HITLER CALLED IT. Your other links reinforce the same problem. In the last one you state "another time I discussed the socialism of Hitler and the Nazis." [CRINGE]. Whether you comprehended it or not, you let your students think that Hitler ran around giving speeches about his "Nazis." (Hitler didn't). You also wrote: "Factoids About Nazi Germany" [CRINGE]. There was no Nazi Germany. And that you do not understand the topic here leaves no doubt that, whether you comprehend it or not, you let your students think that Hitler ran around giving hypnotic speeches about his "Nazi Germany." I hope you know that Hitler did not give speeches about "Nazi Germany." You do know that right? It is painfully clear that I am the first person to have ever explained these things to you. I am not sure you will understand the point even now. I am so deeply sorry. I don't know what else to say. You said "Tom has had a number of episodes where he discusses the socialism in the Nazi Party" [CRINGE]. I feel so badly for you. I suspect sometimes that Tom is similar to you as mentioned in the preceding sentences. Sometimes he just doesn't "get it." He and you do not understand the ignorance that you are spreading and reinforcing.
Woods was schooled by Educational Outreach Programs (EOP) about discoveries from the noted historian Dr. Rex Curry’s archives. As far back as July 19, 2015 the EOP alerted Woods to his errors in Episode 446 entitled “No, Progressives, Capitalism Isn’t Fascism: Here’s What Nazi Germany’s Economy Looked Like.” The title displays Woods’ ignorant use of “Nazi Germany” and “Fascism” and is a prelude to the larger ignorance displayed by Woods within the episode. The EOP’s spokesperson Daniel Pose posted the following public correction to Woods:
“The doctrine of Hitler and his supporters was socialism. It was not "Fascism." They did not call themselves "Nazis" nor "Fascists." They called themselves socialists. http://rexcurry.net
German socialists were allies with Soviet socialists in a pact to divide up Europe, invading Poland together, spreading WWII, and leading to the socialist Wholecaust (of which the Holocaust was a part).
Hitler adopted the hooked-cross symbol to represent crossed "S" letters for "socialism" after it had been used as a symbol for socialism on the first paper ruble money under Soviet socialism (another astounding discovery by the historian Dr. Rex Curry).”
Woods was not happy to learn the “news.” Daniel Pose works with the “Rex Curry Foundation,” a philanthropic organization dedicated to helping the blind and the mentally handicapped. Woods didn’t give up his willful blindness, and he continued to repeat the same errors as the years went by.
Woods probably remains benighted in that he wishes Hitler HAD self-identified as “Nazi, Fascist, Third Reich, or Swastika.” He pushes the inconvenient truth from his mind. He wants to return to his earlier bliss of ignorance.
"The Political Corruption of Language" is the title of Tom Woods’ podcast episode 2212 (published in October 2022) with Jeff Deist as Tom’s guest. The episode shows that Tom Woods and Jeff Deist are ignorant of the fact that Hitler et al did call their movement "Fascist." Hitler and his ilk described their dogma as a "Socialist" (by the very word) in voluminous speeches and writings.
Of all the people in the world who should be fighting the misnomers, it should be Tom Woods and Jeff Deist. They need to stop helping the world's many "Liars For Socialism." The dynamic duo should stop perpetuating widespread ignorance.
The subject of the episode "the Political Corruption of Language" adds so much irony to the points made in the sentences that precede this one. Woods could not have picked a better title for that episode in regard to the word "Fascist" although the pair were both too ignorant to comprehend it. And oh, by the way, in case Tom and Jeff are curious, Hitler did not self-identify as a "Nazi" either (for future reference).
Tom takes offense if anyone objects to his misuse of “Fascist” and “Nazi.” He shows how the people who complain about "Fascist" and "Nazi" as "the political corruption of language" are the same people who overuse "Fascist" and "Nazi" (and they won't explain that Hitler described himself as "Socialist" and not with the words "Fascist" nor "Nazi" nor “Third Reich” nor “Swastika”).
Tom has a bizarre fixation about the word “Nazis.” And about “Fascist.” And about “Third Reich.” He overuses them too much. He needs to end his bizarre fixation on the misnomers. He should tell the truth. Be honest about what Hitler said.
It is a reminder that the people who complain that "Hitler ruined the swastika" are the same people who actually DID ruin the swastika (because they call Hitler's symbol a swastika even though Hitler DID NOT call his symbol a swastika; and Hitler probably did not even know the term "swastika"). Worse still, a tiny fraction of those people know better or have been so informed and they persist in the unqualified misuse of “Swastika” anyway.
Can anyone point to where Tom or Jeff ever stated anywhere that "Hitler did not self-identify as a Fascist" or "Hitler et al did not call themselves Nazis" or "Hitler described himself as 'socialist' by the very word in his voluminous speeches and writings"? If so, please point to it. If not, why not? What is wrong with them? Are they that "well-trained" (brainwashed?) by political correctness? They are in leadership roles to so many people.
Those are not the kind of people who are ever going to tell their audience that German socialism and Soviet socialism partnered to launch WWII, invading Poland together, and going onward from there in a secret conspiracy for INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM that resulted in millions of deaths.
The “Nazi” fixation that is routinely displayed by Woods and Deist is one reason why they both failed to make the astonishing discovery about Hitler's use of his notorious symbol (the discovery that was made by the famed historian Dr. Rex Curry). Woods and Deist could not see. All historians did not see. Can you not see?
The Tom Woods show focused on a published article by Jeff Deist: “Evolution or Corruption? The Imposition of Political Language in the West Today” Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, XXIV, 2022, 2, pp. 55-74, ISSN: 1825-5167). Here is an excerpt that shows ignorance of Hitler’s lexicon:
“But the relentless campaign to label Trump as uniquely fascist or even a ‘Nazi’ was unprecedented and based almost entirely on his abrasive personal style rather than his action. Because political and media elites held such deep contempt for Trump as a populist outsider– the wrong kind of person– they did not hesitate to corrupt and wildly abuse a term normally associated with Hitler’s atrocities. ‘Fascism’ has become one of Orwell’s meaningless words.”
An informed writer could not publish that (in 20-pages of Deist’s article) without mentioning that Hitler did not call himself a "Nazi" and did not describe his dogma as "Fascism." The whole point of the article was to explain how misused the words were. The writer missed the best opportunity to do that. All the writer had to do was tell the truth. Hitler described himself as "SOCIALIST" voluminously and by the very word, repeatedly, and in painful detail, in his comprehensive career of speeches and writings.
Another possible problem is that Deist is so well-conditioned to repeat popular socialist lies that he is unaware of his own "brainwashing."
Deist's ignorance inured to his benefit: If he had explained Hitler's vocabulary then the "Learned Treatise" would not have published his written article. Hitler’s correct vocabulary is verboten. Deist's piece would never have seen the light of day if he had accurately related Hitler's lexicon. Amirite?
Deist and Woods won’t say that Hitler described his movement with the word “Socialist” and without the words “Nazi, Fascist, Third Reich, nor Swastika.” They have also never explained how the Pledge of Allegiance was the origin of the notorious stiff-armed salute used under Hitler and German socialism. They have also never explained how Hitler’s symbol was used to represent “S” letter shapes for “socialist.” What is going on here? It does not seem accidental.
Deist and Woods are not the only so-called “Conservative, Republican, Libertarian” types engaged in an ongoing cover-up. The subterfuge has a history with Lew Rockwell, Paul Gottfried, and many others. It does not seem like mere coincidence that those ideological communities remain so cohesively silent.
You've heard that "Marxist Academics" are teaching socialism to students in colleges, high schools, etc. New research indicates that the academics call themselves "Conservatives, Republicans, and Libertarians," and they are just too stupid to know that they repeat socialist BS to students.
About Hitler: Most academics constantly use the terms "Nazis" and "Nazi Party" and "Nazi Germany" and "Fascists" and Fascism" even though Hitler did not use those terms in his speeches about his Party. Students don't understand what Hitler and his ilk actually said: "SOCIALISM" (by the very word in voluminous speeches and writings). There was no "Nazi Party." Hitler did not give speeches about his "Nazi Party." There was no "Nazi Germany." Hitler did not give speeches about his "Nazi Germany." Most people speak the way all bad teachers speak: they do not understand how they spread ignorance and reinforce it. They cover up for socialism. They unwittingly assist "Liars For Socialism."
The following was a response to a person who had taught history (about Germany before and during WWII). He also wrote articles about the same topics.
You show that you completely fail to understand what I said. You said "your claim that I never discuss the socialism of Hitler is false. Likewise, Tom has had a number of episodes where he discusses the socialism in the Nazi Party and Hitler." I never claimed that you never discuss the socialism of Hitler. You utterly miss the point of all of this. If that weren't embarrassing enough you referred to the "Nazi Party and Hitler." There WAS NO NAZI PARTY. Don't you get it? You have confessed that you have been teaching classrooms full of students that Hitler's party was the "NAZI PARTY." Even if you tell them the "full" name in passing it is clear from your failure to understand the topic here that you let them pass your class thinking that Hitler also used the term "NAZI PARTY" (Hitler did not). Your post is so sad for what you unknowingly revealed. In order to attempt to rectify your comments to students you would have to say "Hitler always used the long version of his party name, or he would say "socialist party" or "National Socialist Party" and he would not say 'Nazi Party' as I have used casually here dear students as I don't want you to misunderstand." You don't "get it." and it is too late for all your students. You would literally have to constantly remind students that even though you keep referring to Hitler's party as the "Nazi Party" THAT IS NOT WHAT HITLER CALLED IT. Your other links reinforce the same problem. In the last one you state "another time I discussed the socialism of Hitler and the Nazis." [CRINGE]. Whether you comprehended it or not, you let your students think that Hitler ran around giving speeches about his "Nazis." (Hitler didn't). You also wrote: "Factoids About Nazi Germany" [CRINGE]. There was no Nazi Germany. And that you do not understand the topic here leaves no doubt that, whether you comprehend it or not, you let your students think that Hitler ran around giving hypnotic speeches about his "Nazi Germany." I hope you know that Hitler did not give speeches about "Nazi Germany." You do know that right? It is painfully clear that I am the first person to have ever explained these things to you. I am not sure you will understand the point even now. I am so deeply sorry. I don't know what else to say. You said "Tom has had a number of episodes where he discusses the socialism in the Nazi Party" [CRINGE]. I feel so badly for you. I suspect sometimes that Tom is similar to you as mentioned in the preceding sentences. Sometimes he just doesn't "get it." He and you do not understand the ignorance that you are spreading and reinforcing.
Ian Tinny
Aug 5, 2023, 7:36:50 PM8/5/23
to
Tom Woods covers up for socialism again in episode 2238. Tom's title ("A Communist Reveals Her Secrets") reveals Tom's misdirection, and socialism is the podcast's biggest secret. Tom and his guest use the word "Communist" to cover up for socialism (in other episodes Tom has a bizarre fixation about the words "Fascism" and "Nazism" and he uses those terms to cover for "socialism"). In 2238, the Soviet Union is mentioned but not its actual name: Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics (USSR). The episode reinforces the popular socialist cliche' coverup that "Communists" and "Fascists" are two extremes that are opposites. That cliche' leaves "socialism" unscathed. Tom and his guest (Paul Kengor of the American Spectator) show their ignorance of the fact that Hitler did not describe his movement as "Fascism" (Hitler described his movement as "SOCIALISM" by the very word in voluminous speeches and writings). Kengor ignorantly explains that "Communism" (Stalin) helped "Fascism" (Hitler) start WWII. That is another classic MSM coverup for socialism. The "Fascists" did not call themselves "Fascists" (they called themselves "SOCIALISTS"). The reality is that Soviet SOCIALISM and German SOCIALISM partnered to launch WWII, invading Poland together, and going onward from there, killing millions, in a secret conspiracy for International SOCIALISM. Soviet socialists did not merely "help the Fascists"[sic] start WWII, as there was more to it than that. Stop covering it up. These points are especially important when you hear that the Catholic Church has sometimes opposed "communism" and then you notice ominously that there was no mention that the Church ever opposed "socialism." Pay attention. It is clear that Tom Woods and Paul Kengor are ignorant of the fact that the so-called "Swastika" was used by Hitler to represent "S" letter shapes for "Socialism" (that is one of the amazing discoveries by the historian Dr. Rex Curry). Tom will never mention it because it doesn't fit his favorite words ("Fascists" and "Nazis"). It doesn't cover up for socialism.
Episode 2238 should have included comments about Germany's two infamous white male racist socialists in comparison: Hitler and Marx. Hitler was influenced by "On The Jewish Question" and "Demands of the Communist Party in Germany" by his comrade Marx. Marx said that the Holocaust of racially inferior "trash" was inevitable and necessary for the revolution. Adolf Hitler was a Marxist. Marx's copious use of the term "Aryan" in Marx's "Ethnological Notebooks" is similar to Hitler's. Again, German socialism partnered with Soviet socialism (under the Marxist Stalin) to launch WWII in a secret conspiracy for International Socialism, invading Poland together, going onward from there, killing millions. But that isn't the MSM version is it?
Message has been deleted
0 new messages