Re: "Hollwood Ten" on TCM
snide sneering Leftwing Jew Soderbergh is making a Che Guevara movie to turn hispanics against USA and white folks
> http://acuf.org/issues/issue94/071022med.asp
>
> If these guys had been exposed publically by private citizens rather than
> harassed (unconstitutionally) by the govt, they would not now be celebrated
> as heros. Perhaps communism itslef would not now project a
> sexy/radical/courageous image for young people.
IF our media weren't dominated by liberal and leftwing jew scum,
hollywood ten would not be heroes.
look, if hollywood had been teeming with nazi sympathizers who'd been
smoked out by a leftwing demagogue, the 'victims' would NOT have been
lionized by the liberal jew run press and academia.
remember our liberal jew run media also championed castro and che
while vilifying pinochet who was far less brutal than leftwing
commies.
it's a matter of who runs the media, not a matter of mccarthy or no
mccarthy. had the hollywood ten been smoked out by citizens' groups,
they would still be lionized as heroes--as victims of unwashed mobs.
it's simply cuz hollywood ten were leftwing jews, and today's media
and academia are run by liberal and leftwing jews.
these liberal jews, by the way, were holocaust deniers. they denied
the ukrainian holocaust when leftwing jews in the USSR killed 10
million innocent 'kulaks'. commies committed horrendous acts of
econocide--extermination of economic classes--all over the globe.
fuc* the leftwing jews.
by the way, since when do leftwing jews care about civil liberties?
if so, why are they for 'hate crime laws' that limit free speech? why
did they make apologies for commie regimes that totally banned all
civil freedoms? and why did leftwing jews make a rosy movie about
'russian' revolution--it was leftwing jewish--in the early 80s?
remember Reds? and why are they making a che guevara movie when che
was totally against liberal democracy? civil liberties matter to
liberal and leftwing jews ONLY when they are the 'victims'. when they
have the power--and they now have total power--they don't mind
curtailing 'racist' and 'sexist' civil liberties. to the left,
politically incorrect speech is NOT free speech.
have you heard that the great racist scientist james watson has been
banned from academic lecture circuits because of his courageous and
correct views on why blacks are so backward and troublesome in africa?
check the news.
and hollywood uses blacklist this very day. if you're a racist,
sexist, nazi sympathizer, disliker of negroes, or anti-gay-agenda, you
cannot get any work in hollywood. they will vilify you, drive you out
of town, and ruin your career.
>
> So often, film buffs talk about moral ambiguity and complexity as a
> desirable and mature attribute in film. Perhaps the same people will
> embrace a less simplistic view of the blacklisting. There were immoral
> bastards at work on both sides, basically.
how is blacklisting commies immoral?
and aren't people--racists, fascists, sexists, anti-gay agenda folks,
christian right, etc--being blacklisted today in hollywood, media, and
academia. suppose you're a brilliant academic who comes up with
racist conclusions--for example, suppose you say that blacks lag
academically cuz they are generally not as smart. what are the chances
of you being hired by any university? but, if you're some lowlife
leftist, you can be a total academic hack and still get tenure.
and look, all people are scum. there aint no saints in this world.
morality is a matter of which side are you on. are you on the side of
good ole US of A or commie leftwing jewtopia? for all their personal
shittiness, huac bastards were patriotic americans. in contrast,
hollywood ten were not only personal scum but political scum. they
were lowlife skunks in personal life and in political life. huac guys
were skunks only in personal life. in political life, they were
patriots.
>
> One true hero in the episode appears to have been good old Ronald Reagan.
ronnie and bonzo saved the day.
>
> Ronald Reagan came into direct conflict with Lawson in July 1946 at a
> meeting of a liberal/leftist cultural group on whose executive committee he
> served, the Hollywood Independent Citizens Committee of Arts, Sciences, and
> Professions (HICCASP). Following allegations by the anti-communist liberal
> Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. that this was a communist front group, Reagan and
> other liberal members sponsored a resolution denouncing communism, just as
> the group earlier had denounced fascism. It stated: "We affirm our belief in
> free enterprise and the democratic system and repudiate Communism as
> desirable for the United States." When Reagan spoke at a committee meeting
> in favor of the resolution, future Hollywood Ten member and Turner hero
> Dalton Trumbo attacked the resolution as wicked (Reagan had been denounced
> at an earlier meeting as "capitalist scum" and an "enemy of the
> proletariat"). And Turner hero Lawson waved a menacing finger at Reagan,
> shouting, "This organization will never adopt a statement which endorses
> free enterprise and repudiates Communism! . . . a two-party system is in no
> way necessary or even desirable in a democracy!" Reagan then proposed a vote
> by all the members in secret ballot. Lawson replied that "the membership
> [wasn't] sophisticated enough to make this decision." (Quoted in Ronald and
> Allis Radosh, Red Star Over Hollywood: The Film Colony's Long Romance with
> the Left (Encounter Books 2006), pages 115- 116). Peter Schweizer writes in
> Reagan's War (Random House, 2002) that Reagan's experiences at this time led
> to his long-range plan to destroy communism.
while ronnie said all those noble words, bonzo tossed bananas at the
scum leftwing jews. hurray for bonzo.
> [and...]
> The Ten's Communist brethren meanwhile were attempting to take over
> Hollywood craft unions, including the Screen Actors Guild. During a violent
> strike they fomented at Reagan's studio, Warner Brothers, studio employees
> avoided the picket lines by entering in shuttle buses. Reagan was the only
> one who, rejecting the warnings of security personnel, sat upright inside
> his bus rather than hiding under a seat. When Reagan, with Gene Kelly,
> Katharine Hepburn and others in the guild tried to mediate an end to the
> strike (the last thing the Communist union wanted), Reagan received a
> telephone call in which an unidentified voice "threatened to see to it that
> he never made films again," as recounted in Schweizer's book (page 11).
> Schweizer continues: "If he continued to oppose the . . . strike, the
> caller, said, 'a squad' would disfigure his face with acid." Reagan received
> many other threats, and felt compelled to hire guards to watch his children;
> he obtained a gun permit and slept with a revolver at his bedside. His wife,
> Jane Wyman, "would awaken and find him sitting up in bed at two in the
> morning, holding the gun because he had heard an unusual sound." Reagan's
> stand against the Communist union earned him verbal abuse from a
> subsequently blacklisted actress, Karen Morley, whom Osborne loves to
> portray only as a victim. Later, repentant former Communist actor Sterling
> Hayden described Reagan as "a one-man battalion" who stopped the Communist
> union's attempted takeover. (Schweizer, pages 12-13.)
>
gas the leftwing jews.
Walter Traprock
to turn hispanics against USA and white folks
<cerebur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> IF our media weren't dominated by liberal and leftwing jew scum,
Now looky here, I think you are being divisive.. All liberal
Jews want Jews to lead the liberal movement, and want Jews to
lead the conservative movement, as well. All conservative Jews
want Jews to lead the conservative movement as well as want Jews
to lead the liberal movement; all Jews want Jews to lead everything
including their idealogical opponents: this is proof that all Jews
are the same, and there is no difference between left-wing and
right-wing Jews. No need to pick on just the leftwing scum.