Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Secession petitions picking up steam
72 views
Skip to first unread message
Eddie Haskell
Nov 14, 2012, 3:52:45 PM11/14/12
to
About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a White
House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration for their
states to secede from the country and create new governments.
The total number on two Pennsylvania petitions rose by Wednesday afternoon
to 17,884, while another 12,330 signed a single New Jersey petition and
6,591 others signed one for Delaware.
Petitions in at least seven states have collected in excess of 25,000
signatures, requiring the Obama Administration to formally respond by
reviewing the requests.
By 2 p.m. Wednesday, Texas had more than 99,000 signatures, the most of any
state.
Two other petitions - with a total of about 25,000 signatures - called for
the deportation and exile of those seeking to withdraw. One said, "Keep the
United States United" and had about 1,700 signatures.
Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede to do
so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
signatures.
The petitions are located on the White House's "We the People" site
(https://petitions.whitehouse.gov).
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20121114_Secession_petitions__pro_and_anti__picking_up_steam.html
-Eddie Haskell
House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration for their
states to secede from the country and create new governments.
The total number on two Pennsylvania petitions rose by Wednesday afternoon
to 17,884, while another 12,330 signed a single New Jersey petition and
6,591 others signed one for Delaware.
Petitions in at least seven states have collected in excess of 25,000
signatures, requiring the Obama Administration to formally respond by
reviewing the requests.
By 2 p.m. Wednesday, Texas had more than 99,000 signatures, the most of any
state.
Two other petitions - with a total of about 25,000 signatures - called for
the deportation and exile of those seeking to withdraw. One said, "Keep the
United States United" and had about 1,700 signatures.
Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede to do
so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
signatures.
The petitions are located on the White House's "We the People" site
(https://petitions.whitehouse.gov).
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20121114_Secession_petitions__pro_and_anti__picking_up_steam.html
-Eddie Haskell
Phlip
Nov 14, 2012, 4:02:39 PM11/14/12
to
> Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede to do
> so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> signatures.
What ever happened to "America, love it or leave it"? Guess they don't
> so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> signatures.
really love it...
Hell Stomper
Nov 14, 2012, 4:02:53 PM11/14/12
to
>
> -Eddie Haskell
The idea of a "United" States is a lie. This simply is not the country
it was founded to be. Obama promised his supporters that he would
fundamentally change the country, and in this, he is succeeding.
Message has been deleted
Eddie Haskell
Nov 14, 2012, 4:11:14 PM11/14/12
to
"Phlip" <phli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0240e552-692a-43fb...@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com...
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Nov 14, 2012, 4:14:06 PM11/14/12
to
"Hell Stomper" <stardu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0c16849d-5870-4b84...@c16g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
-Eddie Haskell
Matt
Nov 14, 2012, 6:47:50 PM11/14/12
to
"Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote in
news:3wTos.169828$3u3....@fed04.iad:
> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
> White House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration
> for their states to secede from the country and create new
> governments.
Ooooo, what is that, a tenth of a percent? Awesome.
We WANT the Republican/STUPID states to leave. We can move the military
bases, soldiers, federal institutes, research money, and everything else
to GOOD states.
And the Republican'ts can starve in the dark.
Bye bye now. Don't let the door hit you on the way out, Mikey Poo
Flanigan.
Go now.
Scoot.
RUN!
Matt
news:3wTos.169828$3u3....@fed04.iad:
> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
> White House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration
> for their states to secede from the country and create new
> governments.
We WANT the Republican/STUPID states to leave. We can move the military
bases, soldiers, federal institutes, research money, and everything else
to GOOD states.
And the Republican'ts can starve in the dark.
Bye bye now. Don't let the door hit you on the way out, Mikey Poo
Flanigan.
Go now.
Scoot.
RUN!
Matt
jigo
Nov 14, 2012, 7:45:10 PM11/14/12
to
want is an even better and more just solution. The sections could be
county size or state size or whatever people are willing to accept
and pay for. Liberals, conservatives, libertarians,
anarcho-syndicalists, anarcho-capitalists could all have their
pieces of ground scattered around what was the former United States.
They could form confederations with like-minded sections. This
would give some real meaning to the old charge "if you don't like it
you can leave," which is impractical under present conditions.
By what right does the U.S. government claim jurisdiction over the
present territory? Europeans acquired it by force and massacring
the native inhabitants; e.g. see
http://ngeorgia.com/history/nghisttt.html
That is, the parts they didn't steal from Mexico, who acquired it by
theft themselves.
The present governments literally do more harm than good. This is
borne out by the hard evidence.
https://sites.google.com/site/governmentdoesmoreharmthangood/
They can't even perform one of their primary functions--protecting
the people.
https://sites.google.com/site/thepolicedomoreharmthangood/
Unfortunately, most people will not take the trouble to look up,
read, and think about the facts. They just accept as given the
indoctrination that they received in school that the U.S. is a
wonderful democracy.
Mitchell Holman
Nov 14, 2012, 10:02:20 PM11/14/12
to
> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
> White House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration
> for their states to secede from the country and create new
> governments.
>
Republican showing how much they hate America
> White House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration
> for their states to secede from the country and create new
> governments.
>
that they want to break it up.
Why do they hate America, do you think?
wy
Nov 14, 2012, 10:24:28 PM11/14/12
to
On Nov 14, 7:46 pm, jigo <reti...@home.com> wrote:
> Eddie Haskell wrote:
> > About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a White
> > House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration for their
> > states to secede from the country and create new governments.
>
> > The total number on two Pennsylvania petitions rose by Wednesday afternoon
> > to 17,884, while another 12,330 signed a single New Jersey petition and
> > 6,591 others signed one for Delaware.
>
> > Petitions in at least seven states have collected in excess of 25,000
> > signatures, requiring the Obama Administration to formally respond by
> > reviewing the requests.
>
> > By 2 p.m. Wednesday, Texas had more than 99,000 signatures, the most of any
> > state.
>
> > Two other petitions - with a total of about 25,000 signatures - called for
> > the deportation and exile of those seeking to withdraw. One said, "Keep the
> > United States United" and had about 1,700 signatures.
>
> > Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede to do
> > so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> > signatures.
>
> > The petitions are located on the White House's "We the People" site
> > (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov).
>
> >http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20121114_Secession_petitio...
> Eddie Haskell wrote:
> > About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a White
> > House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration for their
> > states to secede from the country and create new governments.
>
> > The total number on two Pennsylvania petitions rose by Wednesday afternoon
> > to 17,884, while another 12,330 signed a single New Jersey petition and
> > 6,591 others signed one for Delaware.
>
> > Petitions in at least seven states have collected in excess of 25,000
> > signatures, requiring the Obama Administration to formally respond by
> > reviewing the requests.
>
> > By 2 p.m. Wednesday, Texas had more than 99,000 signatures, the most of any
> > state.
>
> > Two other petitions - with a total of about 25,000 signatures - called for
> > the deportation and exile of those seeking to withdraw. One said, "Keep the
> > United States United" and had about 1,700 signatures.
>
> > Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede to do
> > so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> > signatures.
>
> > The petitions are located on the White House's "We the People" site
> > (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov).
>
>
> > -Eddie Haskell
>
> I think that dividing the country into as many sections as people
> want is an even better and more just solution. The sections could be
> county size or state size or whatever people are willing to accept
> and pay for. Liberals, conservatives, libertarians,
> anarcho-syndicalists, anarcho-capitalists could all have their
> pieces of ground scattered around what was the former United States.
> They could form confederations with like-minded sections. This
> would give some real meaning to the old charge "if you don't like it
> you can leave," which is impractical under present conditions.
All that does is balkanize the US through segregation and turns it
> > -Eddie Haskell
>
> I think that dividing the country into as many sections as people
> want is an even better and more just solution. The sections could be
> county size or state size or whatever people are willing to accept
> and pay for. Liberals, conservatives, libertarians,
> anarcho-syndicalists, anarcho-capitalists could all have their
> pieces of ground scattered around what was the former United States.
> They could form confederations with like-minded sections. This
> would give some real meaning to the old charge "if you don't like it
> you can leave," which is impractical under present conditions.
into another Europe. But that's what Repugnants really want anyway.
As it actually is, the US doesn't conform to their antiquated ideas of
what America should be and is thus a major disappointment to them,
that's why they have to come up with all sorts of stupid ideas of how
to fix the US the way you've just done. Only goes to show how
exclusive, as opposed to inclusive, Repugnants are as an ideological
group, which explains why they lost the last two elections and will
keep losing elections until they become inclusive-minded. But the
chances of the party going extinct are better than their becoming
inclusive-minded.
>
> By what right does the U.S. government claim jurisdiction over the
> present territory? Europeans acquired it by force and massacring
> That is, the parts they didn't steal from Mexico, who acquired it by
> theft themselves.
>
> The present governments literally do more harm than good. This is
> borne out by the hard evidence.
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/governmentdoesmoreharmthangood/
>
> They can't even perform one of their primary functions--protecting
> the people.https://sites.google.com/site/thepolicedomoreharmthangood/
> theft themselves.
>
> The present governments literally do more harm than good. This is
> borne out by the hard evidence.
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/governmentdoesmoreharmthangood/
>
> They can't even perform one of their primary functions--protecting
Hell Stomper
Nov 15, 2012, 2:13:26 AM11/15/12
to
On Nov 14, 10:02 pm, Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote innews:3wTos.169828$3u3....@fed04.iad:
Maybe because it has degenerated into a shit hole.
> "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote innews:3wTos.169828$3u3....@fed04.iad:
Mitchell Holman
Nov 15, 2012, 9:06:47 AM11/15/12
to
Hell Stomper <stardu...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:66a4647c-bc0d-4086...@j18g2000yqf.googlegroups.com:
> On Nov 14, 10:02 pm, Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>> "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote
> d04.iad:
>>
>> > About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on
>> > a White House web site seeking permission from the Obama
>> > administration for their states to secede from the country and
>> > create new governments.
>>
>> Republican showing how much they hate America
>> that they want to break it up.
>>
>> Why do they hate America, do you think?
>
> Maybe because it has degenerated into a shit hole.
Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
>>
>> > About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on
>> > a White House web site seeking permission from the Obama
>> > administration for their states to secede from the country and
>> > create new governments.
>>
>> Republican showing how much they hate America
>> that they want to break it up.
>>
>> Why do they hate America, do you think?
>
> Maybe because it has degenerated into a shit hole.
to someplace with fewer regulations and less
taxes, where they can practice their brand of
"freedom".
Message has been deleted
Eddie Haskell
Nov 15, 2012, 10:49:38 AM11/15/12
to
"jigo" <ret...@home.com> wrote in message
news:50a43b6a$0$9823$607e...@cv.net...
That way if the people of MA want socialized healthcare they can have it,
but the federal government doesn't have the power to force such a system on
the rest of the country.
Ahh, but that was back when we used to have a constitution.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Nov 15, 2012, 10:53:57 AM11/15/12
to
"wy" <w...@myself.com> wrote in message
news:ddf40eb6-5f5d-4820...@v3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
government and free markets. Reverting back to class division and the rule
of man as opposed to the rule of law like mankind has labored under for
centuries is progress for the progressive.
Hint: You're an idiot and don't have what it takes to be a real America.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Nov 15, 2012, 10:55:52 AM11/15/12
to
"Mitchell Holman" <nomailverizon.net> wrote in message
news:XnsA10BD5B3D793A...@216.196.121.131...
You have already destroyed America and we are just trying save what's left,
and you know it.
-Eddie Haskell
jigo
Nov 15, 2012, 10:56:36 AM11/15/12
to
break up into separate entities? It is not segregation if you can
freely choose which type of social-political system you can live
under. Now there is little difference between Republicans and
Democrats. They both support big government, getting involved in
foreign wars, and further infringement on individual rights such as
telling people what they can put into their own bodies.
Politicians, both Democrat and Republican, are nearly all corrupt.
They support the policies of their cronies, who in turn support them
with money and votes. They both support wasting billions of dollars
on victimless "crimes." They both support the loss of civil
liberties. The DEA, TSA, BATF, and local police constantly harass,
arrest, and often murder innocent people with the government's
blessing. Similarly, no-knock raids in which government agents break
down people's doors on hearsay evidence and commit many atrocities
seem fine to them. Politicians are essentially pandering to pressure
groups like the police unions and DEA.
This is all well documented on sites and publications for anyone who
will take the trouble to read some.
https://sites.google.com/site/thepolicedomoreharmthangood/
https://sites.google.com/site/governmentdoesmoreharmthangood/
http://www.aclu.org/racial-justice_prisoners-rights_drug-law-reform_immigrants-rights/fighting-police-abuse-community-ac
http://www.law.northwestern.edu/cwc/
http://www.bettergov.org/investigations/wrongful_convictions_1.aspx
Eddie Haskell
Nov 15, 2012, 10:59:07 AM11/15/12
to
news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131...
No, I think we'll just stay right here and give you fuckwits one more shot
at it, and if you don't wise up we'll simply take over by force and boot
your worthless anti-American asses out and restore the country to it's
former glory.
If you want to live in a third-world socialist shit hole YOU move. There's
plenty of them out there and you have your pick.
-Eddie Haskell
at it, and if you don't wise up we'll simply take over by force and boot
your worthless anti-American asses out and restore the country to it's
former glory.
If you want to live in a third-world socialist shit hole YOU move. There's
plenty of them out there and you have your pick.
-Eddie Haskell
Yak
Nov 15, 2012, 11:00:30 AM11/15/12
to
free stuff can the govt give to me on someone else's dime.
jigo
Nov 15, 2012, 11:04:25 AM11/15/12
to
--Robert A. Heinlein.
The government does not deserve any respect, let alone love. It has
nothing but my contempt, and that includes nearly all politicians in
both major parties.
Message has been deleted
Eddie Haskell
Nov 15, 2012, 11:54:42 AM11/15/12
to
"Yak" <y...@inbox.com> wrote in message
news:96c9a91f-7c27-4eb7...@a14g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
government largess while we go bankrupt.
-Eddie Haskell
Message has been deleted
RichTravsky
Nov 15, 2012, 12:55:21 PM11/15/12
to
Ref at
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892.html#ixzz2CFjLhoPf
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892_Page2.html
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal forcefully rejected Mitt Romney's claim that
he lost because of President Barack Obama's "gifts" to minorities and
young voters.
Asked about the failed GOP nominee's reported comments on a conference
call with donors earlier Wednesday, the incoming chairman of the
Republican Governors Association became visibly agitated.
"No, I think that's absolutely wrong," he said at a press conference that
opened the RGA's post-election meeting here.
...
The Louisiana governor didn’t just get worked up over Romney's comments
to donors in a Wednesday conference call about the root of President
Barack Obama's victory being "gifts" to various constituencies. He's
been stewing for some time over the damage the GOP nominee did to the
party.
...
Considered a likely candidate for the Republican presidential nomination
in 2016, he blamed Romney's defeat last week on the nominee's failure to
outline a vision for where he wanted to take the country.
...
Hey Jindal - time to change parties. Leave the Stupid Party. Come into the
light.
RT
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892.html#ixzz2CFjLhoPf
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892_Page2.html
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal forcefully rejected Mitt Romney's claim that
he lost because of President Barack Obama's "gifts" to minorities and
young voters.
Asked about the failed GOP nominee's reported comments on a conference
call with donors earlier Wednesday, the incoming chairman of the
Republican Governors Association became visibly agitated.
"No, I think that's absolutely wrong," he said at a press conference that
opened the RGA's post-election meeting here.
...
The Louisiana governor didn’t just get worked up over Romney's comments
to donors in a Wednesday conference call about the root of President
Barack Obama's victory being "gifts" to various constituencies. He's
been stewing for some time over the damage the GOP nominee did to the
party.
...
Considered a likely candidate for the Republican presidential nomination
in 2016, he blamed Romney's defeat last week on the nominee's failure to
outline a vision for where he wanted to take the country.
...
Hey Jindal - time to change parties. Leave the Stupid Party. Come into the
light.
RT
Dänk 42Ø
Nov 15, 2012, 1:56:07 PM11/15/12
to
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:55:21 -0700, RichTravsky wrote:
> Ref at
>
> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892.html#ixzz2CFjLhoPf
>
> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892_Page2.html
>
> Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal forcefully rejected Mitt Romney's claim
> that he lost because of President Barack Obama's "gifts" to minorities
> and young voters.
I call them "Obama Crack" instead of "gifts." *
> Ref at
>
> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892.html#ixzz2CFjLhoPf
>
> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892_Page2.html
>
> Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal forcefully rejected Mitt Romney's claim
> that he lost because of President Barack Obama's "gifts" to minorities
> and young voters.
But while free crack does enhance Chairman Obama's popularity, Mitt
Romney lost because he is unappealing. As a politician, Romney is a
clone of Obama, a shallow and vague douche in a suit who says whatever he
thinks the public wants to hear, but he lacks Chairman Obama's Kool-Aid
Kult kharisma. In fact, Romney has a sort of anti-charisma, creeping
people out with his dressage horses and offshore bank accounts, as well
as his brainwashing Stepford cult. But this is what Republicans wanted,
and people chose Kool-Aid over Stepford, so they need to do some serious
reflection if they want their party to survive.
*
Quack Quack for Obama Crack!
http://obamacrack.gofreeserve.com
Bert
Nov 15, 2012, 2:07:17 PM11/15/12
to
In news:Qr-dnVAXWa5apzjN...@earthlink.com Dänk 42Ø
benefits for certain groups in order to retain office?
--
be...@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
<da...@purpleurkel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:55:21 -0700, RichTravsky wrote:
>
>> Ref at
>>
>> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892.html#ixzz2CFjLhoPf
>>
>> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892_Page2.html
>>
>> Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal forcefully rejected Mitt Romney's claim
>> that he lost because of President Barack Obama's "gifts" to
>> minorities and young voters.
>
> I call them "Obama Crack" instead of "gifts." *
You think that no previous officeholder promised special government
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:55:21 -0700, RichTravsky wrote:
>
>> Ref at
>>
>> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892.html#ixzz2CFjLhoPf
>>
>> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892_Page2.html
>>
>> Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal forcefully rejected Mitt Romney's claim
>> that he lost because of President Barack Obama's "gifts" to
>> minorities and young voters.
>
> I call them "Obama Crack" instead of "gifts." *
benefits for certain groups in order to retain office?
--
be...@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN
Message has been deleted
Mitchell Holman
Nov 15, 2012, 10:44:16 PM11/15/12
to
"Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote in
news:gj8ps.226060$GG4.1...@fed06.iad:
>
> "Mitchell Holman" <nomailverizon.net> wrote in message
> news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131...
>> Hell Stomper <stardu...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> news:66a4647c-bc0d-4086...@j18g2000yqf.googlegroups.com
>> :
>>
>>> On Nov 14, 10:02 pm, Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>>> "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote
>>>> innews:3wTos.169828$3u3.44470@fe
>>> d04.iad:
>>>>
>>>> > About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions
>>>> > on a White House web site seeking permission from the Obama
>>>> > administration for their states to secede from the country and
>>>> > create new governments.
>>>>
>>>> Republican showing how much they hate America
>>>> that they want to break it up.
>>>>
>>>> Why do they hate America, do you think?
>>>
>>> Maybe because it has degenerated into a shit hole.
>>
>>
>> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
>> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
>> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>> "freedom".
>
> No, I think we'll just stay right here and give you fuckwits one more
> shot at it, and if you don't wise up we'll simply take over by force
> and boot your worthless anti-American asses out and restore the
> country to it's former glory.
You don't like Democracy?
Then what are you still doing here?
Eddie Haskell
Nov 16, 2012, 10:47:05 AM11/16/12
to
news:XnsA10CDCD017964...@216.196.121.131...
Not when people in possession of civic duty are overwhelmed by the stupid
and corrupt. Now elections won't matter because King Hussein intends to
circumvent congress to implement his agenda, and has already done so on
immigration, Libya and cap-n-tax. So see? You fuckers are the ones that
don't like elections.
Did you like that? The way I just turned it around and rammed it back up
your ass?
> You don't like Democracy?
Mob rule? Fuck no. I prefer a constitutional republic with separation of
powers and a limited government like the framers intended. You know,
everything you are trying destroy?
> Then what are you still doing here?
I already told you that, dumbass.
"I just have to continue to say this notion that somehow I can just change
the laws unilaterally is just not true. We are doing everything we can
administratively. But the fact of the matter is there are laws on the books
that I have to enforce. And I think there's been a great disservice done to
the cause of getting the DREAM Act passed and getting comprehensive
immigration passed by perpetrating the notion that somehow, by myself, I can
go and do these things. It's just not true."
-Hussein, Sept 28, 2011
Washington (CNN) -- In an election-year policy change, the Obama
administration said Friday it will stop deporting young illegal immigrants
who entered the United States as children if they meet certain requirements.
The shift on the politically volatile issue of immigration policy prompted
immediate praise from Latino leaders who have criticized Congress and the
White House for inaction, while Republicans reacted with outrage, saying the
move amounts to amnesty -- a negative buzz word among conservatives -- and
usurps congressional authority.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/15/politics/immigration/index.html
"President Obama's Environmental Protection Agency has devoted an
unprecedented number of bureaucrats to finalizing new anti-coal regulations
that are set to be released at the end of November, according to a source
inside the EPA."
"More than 50 EPA staff are now crashing to finish greenhouse gas emission
standards that would essentially ban all construction of new coal-fired
power plants. Never before have so many EPA resources been devoted to a
single regulation. The independent and non-partisan Manhattan Institute
estimates that the EPA's greenhouse gas coal regulation will cost the U.S.
economy $700 billion"
-Eddie Haskell
and corrupt. Now elections won't matter because King Hussein intends to
circumvent congress to implement his agenda, and has already done so on
immigration, Libya and cap-n-tax. So see? You fuckers are the ones that
don't like elections.
Did you like that? The way I just turned it around and rammed it back up
your ass?
> You don't like Democracy?
powers and a limited government like the framers intended. You know,
everything you are trying destroy?
> Then what are you still doing here?
"I just have to continue to say this notion that somehow I can just change
the laws unilaterally is just not true. We are doing everything we can
administratively. But the fact of the matter is there are laws on the books
that I have to enforce. And I think there's been a great disservice done to
the cause of getting the DREAM Act passed and getting comprehensive
immigration passed by perpetrating the notion that somehow, by myself, I can
go and do these things. It's just not true."
-Hussein, Sept 28, 2011
Washington (CNN) -- In an election-year policy change, the Obama
administration said Friday it will stop deporting young illegal immigrants
who entered the United States as children if they meet certain requirements.
The shift on the politically volatile issue of immigration policy prompted
immediate praise from Latino leaders who have criticized Congress and the
White House for inaction, while Republicans reacted with outrage, saying the
move amounts to amnesty -- a negative buzz word among conservatives -- and
usurps congressional authority.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/15/politics/immigration/index.html
"President Obama's Environmental Protection Agency has devoted an
unprecedented number of bureaucrats to finalizing new anti-coal regulations
that are set to be released at the end of November, according to a source
inside the EPA."
"More than 50 EPA staff are now crashing to finish greenhouse gas emission
standards that would essentially ban all construction of new coal-fired
power plants. Never before have so many EPA resources been devoted to a
single regulation. The independent and non-partisan Manhattan Institute
estimates that the EPA's greenhouse gas coal regulation will cost the U.S.
economy $700 billion"
-Eddie Haskell
R. Dean
Nov 17, 2012, 3:08:59 PM11/17/12
to
transforming America. Republicans are unhappy with a socialist America.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
R. Dean
Nov 17, 2012, 3:12:22 PM11/17/12
to
Nation. Republicans don't want to live under socialism.
><snip>
Wm. Esque
Nov 17, 2012, 3:29:05 PM11/17/12
to
America means changing America into a socialist nation. Most Americans
do not believe this is Obama's goal. If they did, he would not have been
re-elected. What else could it mean?
I asked my Democratic friend what does Obama mean by his promise to
fundamentally transform America? She said he wants to go back to the
constitution and ideas of the founding fathers. However, this is _not_
Obama's agenda.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
>
>
Wm. Esque
Nov 17, 2012, 3:45:07 PM11/17/12
to
On 11/14/2012 10:02 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
fundamentally transformed America, which will become a socialist Nation,
if Obama is successful in all of his endeavors.
You should be grateful to Republicans who are fighting against the
fundamental changes Obama wants and appreciative of their fight to
keep the US a Democratic Country.
>
Unfortunately, most Democrats are deluded into thinking this is not
Obama meant by his promise to fundamentally transform America. However,
very few Democrats have any idea as to what Obama meant by his statement
"fundamentally transform America".
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Wm. Esque
Nov 17, 2012, 4:24:55 PM11/17/12
to
apartment to a single mother with three children today
there are seven children in the household living on food-stamps
and other government programs.
Two of the seven children belong to the oldest daughter who is
now a mother with two children of her own. There isn't a man
in the household, and no one works. They complain about
their standard of living and they blame society.
This is only one example of why republicans are unhappy with
the current democrat party's incestuous relation with the poor
class.
The dermocrat party's strategy is to keep the poor at or near poverty
levels and dependent on government for their livelihood. In this way,
the democratic party is able to buy their votes with taxpayers money.
And thereby they are able to keep the poor the poor on the democratic
plantation. The democratic party created the dependent poor class
of people in order to insure it's own political power.
And they are not satisfied. They want the poor of other countries
to come to our shores and get on the democrat plantation.
The republicans fear this spending will eventually bring about the total
collapse of the United States unless stopped.
>
>
>
Bert
Nov 17, 2012, 4:28:15 PM11/17/12
to
In news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
regulations and more taxes, where they can practice their brand of
"authoritarianism."
[But you do realize that there's actually very little difference between
today's Democrats and Republicans, don't you?]
--
Bert be...@iphouse.com
<nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
> "freedom".
Makes you wonder why Democrats don't move to someplace with more
> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
> "freedom".
regulations and more taxes, where they can practice their brand of
"authoritarianism."
[But you do realize that there's actually very little difference between
today's Democrats and Republicans, don't you?]
--
Bert be...@iphouse.com
Message has been deleted
Wm. Esque
Nov 17, 2012, 5:43:21 PM11/17/12
to
In sworn testimony, behind closed doors, General Petraeus testified,
under oath that someone in the White House changed the report that was
delivered by the intelligence community. They removed any reference to
Al Qaeda.
What the public was given by the Obama administration was a false and
misleading. None of the News Media considers this important, but
four Americans died. The murders were blamed falsely on a youtube video.
This was a deliberate and willful deception. Who is responsible for this
cover-up and why?
Message has been deleted
Mitchell Holman
Nov 17, 2012, 10:09:06 PM11/17/12
to
"R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com> wrote in
news:IcSps.397997$Bz2.2...@fx11.am4:
And he has made America "socialist" how, again?
news:IcSps.397997$Bz2.2...@fx11.am4:
Mitchell Holman
Nov 17, 2012, 10:14:05 PM11/17/12
to
"Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> wrote in news:GgTps.778291$ti6.161555
@fx20.am4:
>> news:66a4647c-bc0d-4086-8dd1-e033437e6d96
So explain why states where Republicans control
everything are also the states with the most poverty.
http://247wallst.com/2011/09/14/americas-poorest-states/2/
@fx20.am4:
>> news:66a4647c-bc0d-4086-8dd1-e033437e6d96
everything are also the states with the most poverty.
http://247wallst.com/2011/09/14/americas-poorest-states/2/
Mitchell Holman
Nov 17, 2012, 10:19:59 PM11/17/12
to
"R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com> wrote in news:v9Sps.82960$GX.23260
@fx01.am4:
Show us this "socialism" Obama is imposing.
December 17, 2010
Obama Signs Bill To Extend Bush Tax Cuts
10-25-2011
Obama Follows Bush Timetable to Get Out of Iraq.
30 September 2011
Obama administration seeks first death penalty
via military tribunal at Guant namo
05/27/2009
Obama signs bill allowing loaded guns into national parks
http://tinyurl.com/q4oguk
05/5/11
Obama's Assault on Medical Marijuana
10/24/2011
Obama Appoints Monsanto Kingpin Michael Taylor
as the United States FDA Food Safety Czar
1/28/09
Obama Appoints Goldman Sachs Lobbyist to Top Treas. Post
1/17/2011
In the Pockets of Banks:Obama Appoints JP Morgan Banker
to Chief of Staff
1/13/2012
Obama seeks to reduce government spending
http://tinyurl.com/7jx2bzb
@fx01.am4:
December 17, 2010
Obama Signs Bill To Extend Bush Tax Cuts
10-25-2011
Obama Follows Bush Timetable to Get Out of Iraq.
30 September 2011
Obama administration seeks first death penalty
via military tribunal at Guant namo
05/27/2009
Obama signs bill allowing loaded guns into national parks
http://tinyurl.com/q4oguk
05/5/11
Obama's Assault on Medical Marijuana
10/24/2011
Obama Appoints Monsanto Kingpin Michael Taylor
as the United States FDA Food Safety Czar
1/28/09
Obama Appoints Goldman Sachs Lobbyist to Top Treas. Post
1/17/2011
In the Pockets of Banks:Obama Appoints JP Morgan Banker
to Chief of Staff
1/13/2012
Obama seeks to reduce government spending
http://tinyurl.com/7jx2bzb
Mitchell Holman
Nov 17, 2012, 10:28:44 PM11/17/12
to
Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in news:XnsA10EDA6A3FB69VeebleFetzer@
216.250.188.140:
> In news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
>> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
>> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>> "freedom".
>
> Makes you wonder why Democrats don't move to someplace with more
> regulations and more taxes, where they can practice their brand of
> "authoritarianism."
>
Democrats don't want to live somewhere else. They
aren't the ones threatening to move to Costa Rica if
Healthcare passes, they aren't the ones trying secede
just because they lose a national election. That is
something only "patriotic" Republicans do.
If conservatives cannot tolerate life under a
black president and his "socialist" agenda - and
who want to leave the US anyway - why don't they
just go?
216.250.188.140:
> In news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
>> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
>> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>> "freedom".
>
> Makes you wonder why Democrats don't move to someplace with more
> regulations and more taxes, where they can practice their brand of
> "authoritarianism."
>
aren't the ones threatening to move to Costa Rica if
Healthcare passes, they aren't the ones trying secede
just because they lose a national election. That is
something only "patriotic" Republicans do.
If conservatives cannot tolerate life under a
black president and his "socialist" agenda - and
who want to leave the US anyway - why don't they
just go?
Bert
Nov 18, 2012, 12:06:24 PM11/18/12
to
In news:XnsA10EDA2EE778...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
There are already numerous countries around the world with societies and
governments structured in exactly the way the Democrats want.
So, why go to all the effort to turn the US into a European
social-democrat welfare state when they can simply move to one of the
many perfect countries that already exist?
<nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in news:XnsA10EDA6A3FB69VeebleFetzer@
> 216.250.188.140:
>
>> In news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell
>> Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
>>> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
>>> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>>> "freedom".
>>
>> Makes you wonder why Democrats don't move to someplace with more
>> regulations and more taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>> "authoritarianism."
>>
>
>
> Democrats don't want to live somewhere else.
Actually, they do.
> Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in news:XnsA10EDA6A3FB69VeebleFetzer@
> 216.250.188.140:
>
>> In news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell
>> Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
>>> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
>>> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>>> "freedom".
>>
>> Makes you wonder why Democrats don't move to someplace with more
>> regulations and more taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>> "authoritarianism."
>>
>
>
> Democrats don't want to live somewhere else.
There are already numerous countries around the world with societies and
governments structured in exactly the way the Democrats want.
So, why go to all the effort to turn the US into a European
social-democrat welfare state when they can simply move to one of the
many perfect countries that already exist?
Mitchell Holman
Nov 18, 2012, 2:25:46 PM11/18/12
to
Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in news:XnsA10F70FBE511DVeebleFetzer@
216.250.188.141:
> In news:XnsA10EDA2EE778...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in news:XnsA10EDA6A3FB69VeebleFetzer@
>> 216.250.188.140:
>>
>>> In news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell
>>> Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
>>>> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
>>>> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>>>> "freedom".
>>>
>>> Makes you wonder why Democrats don't move to someplace with more
>>> regulations and more taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>>> "authoritarianism."
>>>
>>
>>
>> Democrats don't want to live somewhere else.
>
> Actually, they do.
Nope. Democrats didn't respond to Bush's
wins by threatening to secede. That is a strictly
conservative thing.
>
> There are already numerous countries around the world with societies
and
> governments structured in exactly the way the Democrats want.
>
And there are "government free" countries where
Republicans can practice their freedom from taxes and
regulations all their want. Why don't they move there?
> So, why go to all the effort to turn the US into a European
> social-democrat welfare state when they can simply move to one of the
> many perfect countries that already exist?
>
Democrats aren't threatening to leave the
country but never do. That is a Republican thing.
216.250.188.141:
> In news:XnsA10EDA2EE778...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in news:XnsA10EDA6A3FB69VeebleFetzer@
>> 216.250.188.140:
>>
>>> In news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell
>>> Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
>>>> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
>>>> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>>>> "freedom".
>>>
>>> Makes you wonder why Democrats don't move to someplace with more
>>> regulations and more taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>>> "authoritarianism."
>>>
>>
>>
>> Democrats don't want to live somewhere else.
>
> Actually, they do.
wins by threatening to secede. That is a strictly
conservative thing.
>
> There are already numerous countries around the world with societies
and
> governments structured in exactly the way the Democrats want.
>
Republicans can practice their freedom from taxes and
regulations all their want. Why don't they move there?
> So, why go to all the effort to turn the US into a European
> social-democrat welfare state when they can simply move to one of the
> many perfect countries that already exist?
>
country but never do. That is a Republican thing.
Bert
Nov 18, 2012, 3:05:11 PM11/18/12
to
In news:XnsA10F884CF4AD8...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
anti-regulation?
Have you been living under a rock?
<nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> And there are "government free" countries where
> Republicans can practice their freedom from taxes and
> regulations all their want. Why don't they move there?
What ever gave you the idea that Republicans were somehow
> And there are "government free" countries where
> Republicans can practice their freedom from taxes and
> regulations all their want. Why don't they move there?
anti-regulation?
Have you been living under a rock?
Bert
Nov 18, 2012, 3:05:27 PM11/18/12
to
> Democrats aren't threatening to leave the
> country but never do. That is a Republican thing.
Yep; you've been living under a rock.
> country but never do. That is a Republican thing.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Mitchell Holman
Nov 18, 2012, 9:48:17 PM11/18/12
to
Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in news:XnsA10F8F4BDE061VeebleFetzer@
216.250.188.141:
> In news:XnsA10F884CF4AD8...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
>> And there are "government free" countries where
>> Republicans can practice their freedom from taxes and
>> regulations all their want. Why don't they move there?
>
> What ever gave you the idea that Republicans were somehow
> anti-regulation?
>
Why, the Republican Party Platform, of course.
You mean you have never read it?
"The bottom line on regulations is jobs. In listening to
America, one constant we have heard is the job-crippling
effect of even well-intentioned regulation. That makes it
all the more important for federal agencies to be judicious
about the impositions they create on businesses, especially
small businesses. We call for a moratorium on the development
of any new major and costly regulations until a Republican
Administration reviews existing rules to ensure that they
have a sound basis in science and will be cost-effective."
http://www.gop.com/2012-republican-platform_reforming/#Item4
216.250.188.141:
> In news:XnsA10F884CF4AD8...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
>> And there are "government free" countries where
>> Republicans can practice their freedom from taxes and
>> regulations all their want. Why don't they move there?
>
> What ever gave you the idea that Republicans were somehow
> anti-regulation?
>
You mean you have never read it?
"The bottom line on regulations is jobs. In listening to
America, one constant we have heard is the job-crippling
effect of even well-intentioned regulation. That makes it
all the more important for federal agencies to be judicious
about the impositions they create on businesses, especially
small businesses. We call for a moratorium on the development
of any new major and costly regulations until a Republican
Administration reviews existing rules to ensure that they
have a sound basis in science and will be cost-effective."
http://www.gop.com/2012-republican-platform_reforming/#Item4
Eddie Haskell
Nov 19, 2012, 11:56:20 AM11/19/12
to
news:XnsA10ED8B332A08...@216.196.121.131...
massive and punitive taxes on them as a result in his myriad of
redistribution schemes including cap-n-tax and Husseincare.
Your pretense of stupidity is old and boring.
-Eddie Haskell
> "R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com> wrote in news:v9Sps.82960$GX.23260
> @fx01.am4:
>
>> On 11/14/2012 10:02 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote in
>>> news:3wTos.169828$3u3....@fed04.iad:
>>>
>>>> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
>>>> White House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration
>>>> for their states to secede from the country and create new
>>>> governments.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Republican showing how much they hate America
>>> that they want to break it up.
>>>
>>> Why do they hate America, do you think?
>>>
>> It isn't that! They do not like Obama's agenda of fundamentally
>> transforming America. Republicans are unhappy with a socialist America.
>
>
>
>
> Show us this "socialism" Obama is imposing.
He's driving us into a debt crisis that he will blame on the rich and impose
> @fx01.am4:
>
>> On 11/14/2012 10:02 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote in
>>> news:3wTos.169828$3u3....@fed04.iad:
>>>
>>>> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
>>>> White House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration
>>>> for their states to secede from the country and create new
>>>> governments.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Republican showing how much they hate America
>>> that they want to break it up.
>>>
>>> Why do they hate America, do you think?
>>>
>> It isn't that! They do not like Obama's agenda of fundamentally
>> transforming America. Republicans are unhappy with a socialist America.
>
>
>
>
> Show us this "socialism" Obama is imposing.
massive and punitive taxes on them as a result in his myriad of
redistribution schemes including cap-n-tax and Husseincare.
Your pretense of stupidity is old and boring.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Nov 19, 2012, 4:03:40 PM11/19/12
to
news:XnsA10ED6DA84E27...@216.196.121.131...
Your pretense of stupidity routine is so boring.
-Eddie Haskell
-Eddie Haskell
Message has been deleted
Eddie Haskell
Nov 20, 2012, 12:29:34 PM11/20/12
to
"Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:GgTps.778291$ti6.1...@fx20.am4...
destroyed them? Notice who they are focusing on now? The middle-class. And
the spearhead for it's destruction? Husseincare.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Nov 20, 2012, 12:32:16 PM11/20/12
to
"Where's all the China Blue food?" <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:chine.bleu-30389...@news.eternal-september.org...
> In article <GgTps.778291$ti6.1...@fx20.am4>,
> "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> the current democrat party's incestuous relation with the poor
>
> Too bad Republicans don't push for effective means to reduce the poverty.
>
>> the current democrat party's incestuous relation with the poor
>
It's called jobs and an expanding economy, you stupid fucking dick breath.
It's goddamn outrageous. You don't give a fuck about the poor except how you
can use them. I can see through you like a window pane and what I see makes
me sick to my guts.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Nov 20, 2012, 12:36:26 PM11/20/12
to
"Where's all the China Blue food?" <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:chine.bleu-30389...@news.eternal-september.org...
> In article <GgTps.778291$ti6.1...@fx20.am4>,
> "Wm. Esque" <"Wm. Esque"@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> the current democrat party's incestuous relation with the poor
>
>
> Too bad Republicans don't push for effective means to reduce the poverty.
> The
> problem with the cheapest and most effective means, higher education,
> tends to
> make people liberal hence the Republican strategy to keep people stupid
> and
> conservative.
You're the motherfuckers that took over public education and the media in
order to dumb down the public. You go so far as to refuse to allow school
choice so the poor can escape your indoctrination camps. There is no
question whatsoever that it's democrats that benefit from the stupid vote
and it's been a decades long crusade to produce as many as possible to
increase democrat voter ranks.
And you goddamned well know it.
Now, go fuck yourself.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Nov 20, 2012, 12:49:57 PM11/20/12
to
news:XnsA10EDA2EE778...@216.196.121.131...
Choke that one down.
> They
> aren't the ones threatening to move to Costa Rica if
> Healthcare passes,
Who did that, DNC talking point brainwashed retard?
Cite it for us, you little DNC pull string doll.
> they aren't the ones trying secede
> just because they lose a national election.
Oh, is that all it is? I was thinking it was the fact that you are
destroying the country.
> That is
> something only "patriotic" Republicans do.
You on the left stand in direct opposition to everything this country was
founded on and made it great. You are corrupt to the core and to the point
you wanted the country to lose a war for your political gain.
> If conservatives cannot tolerate life under a
> black president
That statement right there proves beyond a shadow that you are either a
blithering stupid fuck or a goddamn despicable liar.
So which one is it?
> and his "socialist" agenda -
"When it comes to the top 2 percent, what I'm not going to do is extend
further a tax cut for those who don't need it."
To each according to his needs. From each according to his ability.
Hack! Hack! Hack it up, boy!
> and
> who want to leave the US anyway -
> why don't they
> just go?
Because we're not quite ready to let you destroy the greatest gift to
mankind, but when we do leave this country will completely implode. No more
civil order. No more money. No more wealth. No more nothing.
You will be fucked.
You're too stupid to realize that too, aren't you?
-Eddie Haskell
> Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in news:XnsA10EDA6A3FB69VeebleFetzer@
> 216.250.188.140:
>
>> In news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
>> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
>>> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
>>> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>>> "freedom".
>>
>> Makes you wonder why Democrats don't move to someplace with more
>> regulations and more taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>> "authoritarianism."
>>
>
>
> Democrats don't want to live somewhere else.
They did when Bush was reelected.
> 216.250.188.140:
>
>> In news:XnsA10C523635E1E...@216.196.121.131 Mitchell Holman
>> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Makes you wonder why Republicans don't move
>>> to someplace with fewer regulations and less
>>> taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>>> "freedom".
>>
>> Makes you wonder why Democrats don't move to someplace with more
>> regulations and more taxes, where they can practice their brand of
>> "authoritarianism."
>>
>
>
> Democrats don't want to live somewhere else.
Choke that one down.
> They
> aren't the ones threatening to move to Costa Rica if
> Healthcare passes,
Cite it for us, you little DNC pull string doll.
> they aren't the ones trying secede
> just because they lose a national election.
destroying the country.
> That is
> something only "patriotic" Republicans do.
founded on and made it great. You are corrupt to the core and to the point
you wanted the country to lose a war for your political gain.
> If conservatives cannot tolerate life under a
> black president
blithering stupid fuck or a goddamn despicable liar.
So which one is it?
> and his "socialist" agenda -
further a tax cut for those who don't need it."
To each according to his needs. From each according to his ability.
Hack! Hack! Hack it up, boy!
> and
> who want to leave the US anyway -
> why don't they
> just go?
mankind, but when we do leave this country will completely implode. No more
civil order. No more money. No more wealth. No more nothing.
You will be fucked.
You're too stupid to realize that too, aren't you?
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Nov 20, 2012, 1:35:05 PM11/20/12
to
"Bert" <be...@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:XnsA10EDA6A3FB...@216.250.188.140...
Now, why should he stick his neck out with friends like you?
Answer that.
-Eddie Haskell
Amanda Williams
Nov 20, 2012, 2:36:50 PM11/20/12
to
"Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote in
news:Vlwqs.406$dN6...@fed11.iad:
texass and the rest of those southern shitholes and the trash that
inhabit them....we could solve the deficit overnightjust leave the REAL
america alone
--
Amanda williams – Small but dangerous
Eddie Haskell
Nov 20, 2012, 4:41:22 PM11/20/12
to
"Amanda Williams" <F...@PMS.COM> wrote in message
news:XnsA11194AB4...@209.197.12.12...
Take your lies and pack them up your ass for your trip to Venezuela,
dumbass.
-Eddie Haskell
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 9:48:19 PM11/20/12
to
Ref at
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83970.html
Chris Christie unwraps Mitt Romney's 'gift' claim
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie on Friday joined the chorus of Republican
governors and other officials criticizing Mitt Romney's assertion that
"gifts" from President Barack Obama helped the Democrat win reelection.
"Yeah, sure," Christie replied when asked by MSNBC host Joe Scarborough
if Romney's comments were "a terrible thing to say."
...
Yup
RT
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83970.html
Chris Christie unwraps Mitt Romney's 'gift' claim
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie on Friday joined the chorus of Republican
governors and other officials criticizing Mitt Romney's assertion that
"gifts" from President Barack Obama helped the Democrat win reelection.
"Yeah, sure," Christie replied when asked by MSNBC host Joe Scarborough
if Romney's comments were "a terrible thing to say."
...
Yup
RT
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 9:51:46 PM11/20/12
to
Ref at
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83983.html
Tim Pawlenty on Friday disputed Mitt Romney�s controversial remarks
claiming that President Barack Obama won reelection by handing out
"gifts" to his core constituencies, saying in an interview that
American voters do not have the mentality of, "I'm going to vote
because of gifts."
"I think President Obama, first of all, just tactically did a better
job getting out the vote in his campaign. But No. 2, he, at least at
the margins, was better able to connect with people in this campaign,"
Pawlenty said in an interview with C-SPAN's "Newsmakers" program
scheduled to air on Sunday.
...
And another one spanks Willard...
RT
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83983.html
Tim Pawlenty on Friday disputed Mitt Romney�s controversial remarks
claiming that President Barack Obama won reelection by handing out
"gifts" to his core constituencies, saying in an interview that
American voters do not have the mentality of, "I'm going to vote
because of gifts."
"I think President Obama, first of all, just tactically did a better
job getting out the vote in his campaign. But No. 2, he, at least at
the margins, was better able to connect with people in this campaign,"
Pawlenty said in an interview with C-SPAN's "Newsmakers" program
scheduled to air on Sunday.
...
And another one spanks Willard...
RT
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:04:39 PM11/20/12
to
Ref at
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/marco-rubio-carefully-weighs-in-on-romneys-gifts
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) carefully avoided criticizing Mitt Romney for
the ex-nominee's claim that "gifts" to minorities, youth, and women
were responsible for President Obama's victory, telling Politico on
Thursday that Romney was merely offering an "analysis to donors."
...
Yeah right...
RT
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/marco-rubio-carefully-weighs-in-on-romneys-gifts
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) carefully avoided criticizing Mitt Romney for
the ex-nominee's claim that "gifts" to minorities, youth, and women
were responsible for President Obama's victory, telling Politico on
Thursday that Romney was merely offering an "analysis to donors."
...
Yeah right...
RT
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:09:57 PM11/20/12
to
Ref at
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83938.html
A handful of prominent Republicans criticized Mitt Romney for his
disparaging remarks about President Barack Obama's "gifts" to core
constituencies, saying that it was the wrong message to send voters
as the party tries to rebuild itself after a bruising defeat.
Gosh, poor Willard doesn't seem to have any friends left. At least
his dog still likes him.
Oh, wait... not after the car trip ;)
RT
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83938.html
A handful of prominent Republicans criticized Mitt Romney for his
disparaging remarks about President Barack Obama's "gifts" to core
constituencies, saying that it was the wrong message to send voters
as the party tries to rebuild itself after a bruising defeat.
Gosh, poor Willard doesn't seem to have any friends left. At least
his dog still likes him.
Oh, wait... not after the car trip ;)
RT
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:13:30 PM11/20/12
to
Ref at
http://www.ibtimes.com/newt-gingrich-calls-romney-gifts-comments-nuts-republicans-distance-themselves-889078
...
"I think it's nuts," said Gingrich. "I just think it's insulting. ..."
...
And that's what America thought too.
RT
http://www.ibtimes.com/newt-gingrich-calls-romney-gifts-comments-nuts-republicans-distance-themselves-889078
...
"I think it's nuts," said Gingrich. "I just think it's insulting. ..."
...
And that's what America thought too.
RT
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:14:39 PM11/20/12
to
Mike Flannigan wrote:
>
> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a White
Gosh Miguel, that's a lot of X's from you trailer park trash types.
>
> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a White
RT
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:15:05 PM11/20/12
to
Hell Stomper wrote:
> it was founded to be. Obama promised his supporters that he would
It hasn't been since the mid 1800s. Duh.
> fundamentally change the country, and in this, he is succeeding.
>
> On Nov 14, 3:52 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote:
> > About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a White
> On Nov 14, 3:52 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote:
> > About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a White
> > House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration for their
> > states to secede from the country and create new governments.
> >
> > states to secede from the country and create new governments.
> >
> > The total number on two Pennsylvania petitions rose by Wednesday afternoon
> > to 17,884, while another 12,330 signed a single New Jersey petition and
> > 6,591 others signed one for Delaware.
> >
> > Petitions in at least seven states have collected in excess of 25,000
> > signatures, requiring the Obama Administration to formally respond by
> > reviewing the requests.
> >
> > By 2 p.m. Wednesday, Texas had more than 99,000 signatures, the most of any
> > state.
> >
> > Two other petitions - with a total of about 25,000 signatures - called for
> > the deportation and exile of those seeking to withdraw. One said, "Keep the
> > United States United" and had about 1,700 signatures.
> >
> > Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede to do
> > so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> > signatures.
> >
> > The petitions are located on the White House's "We the People" site
> > (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov).
> >
> > http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20121114_Secession_petitio...
> >
> > -Eddie Haskell
>
> The idea of a "United" States is a lie. This simply is not the country
> > to 17,884, while another 12,330 signed a single New Jersey petition and
> > 6,591 others signed one for Delaware.
> >
> > Petitions in at least seven states have collected in excess of 25,000
> > signatures, requiring the Obama Administration to formally respond by
> > reviewing the requests.
> >
> > By 2 p.m. Wednesday, Texas had more than 99,000 signatures, the most of any
> > state.
> >
> > Two other petitions - with a total of about 25,000 signatures - called for
> > the deportation and exile of those seeking to withdraw. One said, "Keep the
> > United States United" and had about 1,700 signatures.
> >
> > Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede to do
> > so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> > signatures.
> >
> > The petitions are located on the White House's "We the People" site
> > (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov).
> >
> > http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20121114_Secession_petitio...
> >
> > -Eddie Haskell
>
> it was founded to be. Obama promised his supporters that he would
It hasn't been since the mid 1800s. Duh.
> fundamentally change the country, and in this, he is succeeding.
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:15:35 PM11/20/12
to
Mike Flannigan wrote:
>
> "Phlip" <phli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:0240e552-692a-43fb...@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com...
> > really love it...
>
> If you had ended it after "America" you would have had it right.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
That's an old con-servative slogan, Miguel.
RT
>
> "Phlip" <phli...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:0240e552-692a-43fb...@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com...
> >> Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede to
> >> do
> >> so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> >> signatures.
> >
> > What ever happened to "America, love it or leave it"? Guess they don't
> >> do
> >> so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> >> signatures.
> >
> > really love it...
>
> If you had ended it after "America" you would have had it right.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
That's an old con-servative slogan, Miguel.
RT
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:16:26 PM11/20/12
to
Mike Flannigan wrote:
> "jigo" <ret...@home.com> wrote in message
>
> That way if the people of MA want socialized healthcare they can have it,
Socialized healthcare in Massachusetts? Hmmm. Oh yeah - ROMNEYCARE
> but the federal government doesn't have the power to force such a system on
> the rest of the country.
>
> Ahh, but that was back when we used to have a constitution.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
> "jigo" <ret...@home.com> wrote in message
> > Eddie Haskell wrote:
> >> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
> >> White
> >> House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration for their
> >> states to secede from the country and create new governments.
> >>
> >> The total number on two Pennsylvania petitions rose by Wednesday
> >> afternoon
> >> to 17,884, while another 12,330 signed a single New Jersey petition and
> >> 6,591 others signed one for Delaware.
> >>
> >> Petitions in at least seven states have collected in excess of 25,000
> >> signatures, requiring the Obama Administration to formally respond by
> >> reviewing the requests.
> >>
> >> By 2 p.m. Wednesday, Texas had more than 99,000 signatures, the most of
> >> any
> >> state.
> >>
> >> Two other petitions - with a total of about 25,000 signatures - called
> >> for
> >> the deportation and exile of those seeking to withdraw. One said, "Keep
> >> the
> >> United States United" and had about 1,700 signatures.
> >>
> >> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
> >> White
> >> House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration for their
> >> states to secede from the country and create new governments.
> >>
> >> The total number on two Pennsylvania petitions rose by Wednesday
> >> afternoon
> >> to 17,884, while another 12,330 signed a single New Jersey petition and
> >> 6,591 others signed one for Delaware.
> >>
> >> Petitions in at least seven states have collected in excess of 25,000
> >> signatures, requiring the Obama Administration to formally respond by
> >> reviewing the requests.
> >>
> >> By 2 p.m. Wednesday, Texas had more than 99,000 signatures, the most of
> >> any
> >> state.
> >>
> >> Two other petitions - with a total of about 25,000 signatures - called
> >> for
> >> the deportation and exile of those seeking to withdraw. One said, "Keep
> >> the
> >> United States United" and had about 1,700 signatures.
> >>
> >> Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede to
> >> do
> >> so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> >> signatures.
> >>
> >> do
> >> so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> >> signatures.
> >>
> >> The petitions are located on the White House's "We the People" site
> >> (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov).
> >>
> >> http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20121114_Secession_petitions__pro_and_anti__picking_up_steam.html
> >> (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov).
> >>
> >>
> >> -Eddie Haskell
> >
> > I think that dividing the country into as many sections as people want is
> > an even better and more just solution. The sections could be county size
> > or state size or whatever people are willing to accept and pay for.
> > Liberals, conservatives, libertarians, anarcho-syndicalists,
> > anarcho-capitalists could all have their pieces of ground scattered around
> > what was the former United States. They could form confederations with
> > like-minded sections. This would give some real meaning to the old charge
> > "if you don't like it you can leave," which is impractical under present
> > conditions.
>
> In other words, go back to a federalist constitutional system.
> >> -Eddie Haskell
> >
> > I think that dividing the country into as many sections as people want is
> > an even better and more just solution. The sections could be county size
> > or state size or whatever people are willing to accept and pay for.
> > Liberals, conservatives, libertarians, anarcho-syndicalists,
> > anarcho-capitalists could all have their pieces of ground scattered around
> > what was the former United States. They could form confederations with
> > like-minded sections. This would give some real meaning to the old charge
> > "if you don't like it you can leave," which is impractical under present
> > conditions.
>
>
> That way if the people of MA want socialized healthcare they can have it,
Socialized healthcare in Massachusetts? Hmmm. Oh yeah - ROMNEYCARE
> but the federal government doesn't have the power to force such a system on
> the rest of the country.
>
> Ahh, but that was back when we used to have a constitution.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:27:16 PM11/20/12
to
"R. Dean" wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2012 10:02 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> > "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote in
> >
>
> On 11/14/2012 10:02 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> > "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote in
> >
> >> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
> >> White House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration
> >> for their states to secede from the country and create new
> >> governments.
> >>
> >
> >
> >> White House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration
> >> for their states to secede from the country and create new
> >> governments.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Republican showing how much they hate America
> > that they want to break it up.
> >
> > Why do they hate America, do you think?
> >
> It isn't that! They do not like Obama's agenda of fundamentally
> transforming America. Republicans are unhappy with a socialist America.
As opposed to socialist Massachusetts under Willard?
> > that they want to break it up.
> >
> > Why do they hate America, do you think?
> >
> It isn't that! They do not like Obama's agenda of fundamentally
> transforming America. Republicans are unhappy with a socialist America.
RT
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:29:26 PM11/20/12
to
"R. Dean" wrote:
But socialist RomneyCare is ok?
>
> On 11/14/2012 10:24 PM, wy wrote:
> >
> Obama's agenda is to fundamentally transform America into a Socialist
> Nation. Republicans don't want to live under socialism.
> On 11/14/2012 10:24 PM, wy wrote:
> >
> Obama's agenda is to fundamentally transform America into a Socialist
But socialist RomneyCare is ok?
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:32:31 PM11/20/12
to
"Wm. Esque" wrote:
> On 11/14/2012 10:02 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> > "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote in
> >
> >> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
> >> White House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration
> >> for their states to secede from the country and create new
> >> governments.
> >
> > Republican showing how much they hate America
> > that they want to break it up.
> >
> > Why do they hate America, do you think?
> >
> Actually, Republicans don't want to live under Obama's
> On 11/14/2012 10:02 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> > "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote in
> >
> >> About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
> >> White House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration
> >> for their states to secede from the country and create new
> >> governments.
> >
> > Republican showing how much they hate America
> > that they want to break it up.
> >
> > Why do they hate America, do you think?
> >
> fundamentally transformed America, which will become a socialist Nation,
Is RomneyCare socialist?
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:36:56 PM11/20/12
to
Mike Flannigan wrote:
> "Yak" <y...@inbox.com> wrote in message
> On Nov 15, 10:53 am, "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote:
> > "wy" <w...@myself.com> wrote in message
> > government and free markets. Reverting back to class division and the rule
> > of man as opposed to the rule of law like mankind has labored under for
> > centuries is progress for the progressive.
> >
> > Hint: You're an idiot and don't have what it takes to be a real America.
>
> > The left's idea of being inclusive really means how much security and
> > free stuff can the govt give to me on someone else's dime.
>
> Being inclusive means including the takers by buying their votes with
> government largess while we go bankrupt.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
Ah. Like corporate welfare.
RT
> "Yak" <y...@inbox.com> wrote in message
> On Nov 15, 10:53 am, "Eddie Haskell" <tyv...@sqpcb.com> wrote:
> > "wy" <w...@myself.com> wrote in message
> > > > About 700,000 people, from all 50 states, have signed petitions on a
> > > > White
> > > > House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration for
> > > > their
> > > > states to secede from the country and create new governments.
> >
> > > > White
> > > > House web site seeking permission from the Obama administration for
> > > > their
> > > > states to secede from the country and create new governments.
> >
> > > > The total number on two Pennsylvania petitions rose by Wednesday
> > > > afternoon
> > > > to 17,884, while another 12,330 signed a single New Jersey petition
> > > > and
> > > > 6,591 others signed one for Delaware.
> >
> > > > Petitions in at least seven states have collected in excess of 25,000
> > > > signatures, requiring the Obama Administration to formally respond by
> > > > reviewing the requests.
> >
> > > > By 2 p.m. Wednesday, Texas had more than 99,000 signatures, the most
> > > > of any state.
> >
> > > > Two other petitions - with a total of about 25,000 signatures - called
> > > > for
> > > > the deportation and exile of those seeking to withdraw. One said,
> > > > "Keep
> > > > the
> > > > United States United" and had about 1,700 signatures.
> >
> > > > Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede
> > > > to
> > > > do
> > > > so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> > > > signatures.
> >
> > > > The petitions are located on the White House's "We the People" site
> > > > (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov).
> >
> > > >http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20121114_Secession_petitio...
> > > > afternoon
> > > > to 17,884, while another 12,330 signed a single New Jersey petition
> > > > and
> > > > 6,591 others signed one for Delaware.
> >
> > > > Petitions in at least seven states have collected in excess of 25,000
> > > > signatures, requiring the Obama Administration to formally respond by
> > > > reviewing the requests.
> >
> > > > By 2 p.m. Wednesday, Texas had more than 99,000 signatures, the most
> > > > of any state.
> >
> > > > Two other petitions - with a total of about 25,000 signatures - called
> > > > for
> > > > the deportation and exile of those seeking to withdraw. One said,
> > > > "Keep
> > > > the
> > > > United States United" and had about 1,700 signatures.
> >
> > > > Another said, "Peacefully allow the states that have asked to secede
> > > > to
> > > > do
> > > > so and form their own NEW nation together," and had more than 5,700
> > > > signatures.
> >
> > > > The petitions are located on the White House's "We the People" site
> > > > (https://petitions.whitehouse.gov).
> >
> >
> > > I think that dividing the country into as many sections as people
> > > want is an even better and more just solution. The sections could be
> > > county size or state size or whatever people are willing to accept
> > > and pay for. Liberals, conservatives, libertarians,
> > > anarcho-syndicalists, anarcho-capitalists could all have their
> > > pieces of ground scattered around what was the former United States.
> > > They could form confederations with like-minded sections. This
> > > would give some real meaning to the old charge "if you don't like it
> > > you can leave," which is impractical under present conditions.
> > > I think that dividing the country into as many sections as people
> > > want is an even better and more just solution. The sections could be
> > > county size or state size or whatever people are willing to accept
> > > and pay for. Liberals, conservatives, libertarians,
> > > anarcho-syndicalists, anarcho-capitalists could all have their
> > > pieces of ground scattered around what was the former United States.
> > > They could form confederations with like-minded sections. This
> > > would give some real meaning to the old charge "if you don't like it
> > > you can leave," which is impractical under present conditions.
> > > All that does is balkanize the US through segregation and turns it
> > > into another Europe. But that's what Repugnants really want anyway.
> > > As it actually is, the US doesn't conform to their antiquated ideas of
> > > what America should be
> >
> > Yeah, antiquated ideas like the rule of law, the constitution, limited
> > > into another Europe. But that's what Repugnants really want anyway.
> > > As it actually is, the US doesn't conform to their antiquated ideas of
> > > what America should be
> >
> > government and free markets. Reverting back to class division and the rule
> > of man as opposed to the rule of law like mankind has labored under for
> > centuries is progress for the progressive.
> >
> > Hint: You're an idiot and don't have what it takes to be a real America.
>
> > The left's idea of being inclusive really means how much security and
> > free stuff can the govt give to me on someone else's dime.
>
> Being inclusive means including the takers by buying their votes with
> government largess while we go bankrupt.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
Ah. Like corporate welfare.
RT
RichTravsky
Nov 20, 2012, 10:37:45 PM11/20/12
to
> > On 11/14/2012 10:24 PM, wy wrote:
> >> of what America should be and is thus a major disappointment to them,
> >> that's why they have to come up with all sorts of stupid ideas of how
> >> to fix the US the way you've just done. Only goes to show how
> >> exclusive, as opposed to inclusive, Repugnants are as an ideological
> >> group, which explains why they lost the last two elections and will
> >> keep losing elections until they become inclusive-minded. But the
> >> chances of the party going extinct are better than their becoming
> >> inclusive-minded.
> >>
> >> that's why they have to come up with all sorts of stupid ideas of how
> >> to fix the US the way you've just done. Only goes to show how
> >> exclusive, as opposed to inclusive, Repugnants are as an ideological
> >> group, which explains why they lost the last two elections and will
> >> keep losing elections until they become inclusive-minded. But the
> >> chances of the party going extinct are better than their becoming
> >> inclusive-minded.
> >>
> > Obama's agenda is to fundamentally transform America into a Socialist
> > Nation. Republicans don't want to live under socialism.
>
> And he has made America "socialist" how, again?
By adopting RomneyCare.
>
> And he has made America "socialist" how, again?
RT
Dänk 42Ø
Nov 21, 2012, 12:48:05 PM11/21/12
to
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:13:30 -0700, RichTravsky wrote:
> Ref at
>
>
> http://www.ibtimes.com/newt-gingrich-calls-romney-gifts-comments-nuts-
http://obamacrack.gofreeserve.com
> Ref at
>
>
> http://www.ibtimes.com/newt-gingrich-calls-romney-gifts-comments-nuts-
republicans-distance-themselves-889078
> ...
> "I think it's nuts," said Gingrich. "I just think it's insulting. ..."
> ...
>
> And that's what America thought too.
Quack Quack for Obama Crack!
> ...
> "I think it's nuts," said Gingrich. "I just think it's insulting. ..."
> ...
>
> And that's what America thought too.
http://obamacrack.gofreeserve.com
RichTravsky
Nov 24, 2012, 1:08:10 AM11/24/12
to
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892.html#ixzz2CFjLhoPf
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83892_Page2.html
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal forcefully rejected Mitt Romney's claim that
he lost because of President Barack Obama's "gifts" to minorities and
young voters.
Asked about the failed GOP nominee's reported comments on a conference
call with donors earlier Wednesday, the incoming chairman of the
Republican Governors Association became visibly agitated.
"No, I think that's absolutely wrong," he said at a press conference that
opened the RGA's post-election meeting here.
...
The Louisiana governor didn’t just get worked up over Romney's comments
to donors in a Wednesday conference call about the root of President
Barack Obama's victory being "gifts" to various constituencies. He's
been stewing for some time over the damage the GOP nominee did to the
party.
...
Considered a likely candidate for the Republican presidential nomination
in 2016, he blamed Romney's defeat last week on the nominee's failure to
outline a vision for where he wanted to take the country.
...
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83938.html
A handful of prominent Republicans criticized Mitt Romney for his
disparaging remarks about President Barack Obama's "gifts" to core
constituencies, saying that it was the wrong message to send voters
as the party tries to rebuild itself after a bruising defeat.
http://www.ibtimes.com/newt-gingrich-calls-romney-gifts-comments-nuts-republicans-distance-themselves-889078
A handful of prominent Republicans criticized Mitt Romney for his
disparaging remarks about President Barack Obama's "gifts" to core
constituencies, saying that it was the wrong message to send voters
as the party tries to rebuild itself after a bruising defeat.
0 new messages