Mitch "the Bitch" Hole-Man Plays The Bullshit Liberal Word Game
... in which, because he has no argument, AND he got his ass kicked on whether
Biden called Jan. 6th an "insurrection", he did... he resorts to playing the
childish game of "What does this word mean?"
Today's pedantic pussy question, "HOW immediate is immediately?"
It doesn't matter... you got called out on your stupidity and lost, when YOU
said Biden never said, "Biden made no statements on Jan 6, much less calling
the attack an insurrection.
That proved you are a liar right there, so you went on to pick out another
word, that you THOUGHT you could argue, because you nerds have such low-self-
esteem, you HAVE to do this in order to make you feel better about what a
lonely shit existence you have and had your entire lives. You nerds lived in
your own little nerdy worlds, in which you planned the destruction of the human
race, and went off into the cosmos with Spock on board the USS Enterprise.
I know the type... all you liberal nerds are fucked in the head that way.
This is how you basement-dwellers "argue" when you've had your ass kicked and
don't HAVE an argument. It's better to attack that which you THINK you can win
against, but not this time, pussy... not this time. You lost... suck it up.
THIS is how the pedantic little nerds THINK they win arguments: Trump might say
he wore a Blue suit, to which you pussies would reply and say, "he wasn't
wearing blue... it's was azure."
THAT'S how these freaky fucked-in-the head liberal nerds make themselves feel
better about their pansy-ass pussy lives and ways.
Mitchie doesn't have a refutation, so he picked out a word that might not have
the meaning HE thinks it does, and plays bullshit childish games.
What does "immediate" mean? WHEN was immediate? You lose, pussy... you lose.
On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:12:14 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
> > On Wed, 07 Jun 2023 02:04:59 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
> >
> >> > Samsel soon found himself on the front lines of a protest the
> >> > national media and Joe Biden immediately branded an "insurrection."
> >
> >> Biden made no statements on Jan 6
> >
> > NO ONE said he said it ON Jan. 6th, moron liberal, but he did.
>
>
> Your claim, from above.
Your claim:
"Biden made no statements on Jan 6, much less calling the attack an
insurrection."
WRONG.
LIE.
First off, pussy... it's not a "claim".
Argue the points, not the OPINIONATED words someone might use.
You can't, so this is why we get this pedantic bullshit from a pansy-ass pussy
basement-dweller, like yourself.
His first words publicly, QUALIFY as immediate, but that doesn't fucking matter
to you, does it?
At what time, when Biden DID say it was an insurrection, was "immediate" to
you?
The question is rhetorical, but you go ahead and answer... we all would like to
see what bullshit answer you come up with.
WHEN was "immediate"?
> "Joe Biden -----> immediately <------ branded an insurrection."
You pedantic little shit. Tell us what "immediately" means to you? The press,
which wrote that line, by the way, you fucking moron, doesn't have access to
sleeping Joe Biden, so when he said ANYTHING publicly, whoever wrote that line,
thought it "immediate".
What YOU think doesn't matter, because this bullshit argument isn't meant to
refute anything... it's just a way to make yourself feel better about, once
again, getting your ass kicked by a big dumb jock.
LOL... takes you back, doesn't it, nerd? Are you planning my murder now, so you
can have a shot at a date with my girlfriend... the captain of the
cheerleaders? LOL
So, to you, when WAS "immediately"? The night before, when Ray Epps was
gathering up his protesters and telling them they needed to go INTO the
Capitol? The morning of, when Ray Epps was still gathering up his protesters
and planning the breach? During Trump's speech? When they got to the barricades
and Ray Epps was telling everyone to breach? When they breached the barricades
and Ray Epps slinked away like a pussy FBI agent?
Biden said it was an insurrection BEFORE Trump made HIS speech about "going
home" and they were the first words he said PUBLICLY, so yeah, they WERE
immediate, you pedantic little pussy of a liberal child.
=====
Liberals Are Wimps (New Study Shocks Scientific Community...
https://freedomwire.com/liberals-are-wimps-new-study-shocks-scientific-
community/
Liberal men are physically smaller and weaker than conservative men - and it's
measurable.
Science says liberals, not conservatives, are psychotic
https://nypost.com/2016/06/09/science-says-liberal-beliefs-are-linked-to-
pyschotic-traits/
Jun 9, 2016 Turns out liberals are the real authoritarians. A political-science
journal that published an oft-cited study claiming conservatives were more
likely to show traits associated with "psychoticism"...
=====
Vice Admits Liberal Men are Weaker, Less Attractive than...
https://phillipschneider.com/vice-admits-liberal-men-are-weaker-less-
attractive-than-conservatives/
Vice Admits Liberal Men are Weaker, Less Attractive than Conservatives By
Phillip Schneider on August 11, 2020 ( Leave a comment ) While the flames of
the culture war rage, even far-left media publication Vice admits that liberal
men are weaker and less competent than conservatives.
=====
TRUTH: Why Liberals Are WEAKER Than Conservatives
https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/truth-liberals-weaker-conservatives
TRUTH: Why Liberals Are WEAKER Than Conservatives. Speaking of weak liberals,
who can't even stand the sight of history: Texas Restaurant Defending
Controversial Sign Some Are Calling Racist - by Robert Gehl. A Texas restaurant
is under attack on social media for what many are calling its racist décor. The
neon sign hung at Cook's Garage...
=====
Science Proves That Liberals Are Crazier Than Conservatives
https://freedomwire.com/liberals-are-crazy/
Well, I recently came across a fantastic article about another study of
Liberals - except this time, instead of focusing on the weak males, it focuses
on the average Liberal woman instead. A Ph.D. candidate at Georgia State
University has analyzed the data out of a recent Pew Research Center poll, and
the results are amazing.
=====
Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal
https://redstate.com/terichristoph/2017/05/26/shocker-study-shows-physically-
weak-men-tend-to-be-liberal-n72373
Shocker: Study Shows Physically Weak Men Tend to be Liberal. In news that will
surprise absolutely no one, a new study reveals that girly men are more likely
to favor socialist policies. The study, conducted by researchers at Brunel
University London, looked at the height, weight, physical strength, and bicep
circumference of 171 men, along...
=====
Liberalism Breeds Soft, Weak, Young "Men" - Louder With...
https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/liberalism-breeds-soft-weak-young-men
by Steven Crowder I know some of you think when I say "liberalism breeds weak,
fat men," that I'm merely politicizing an issue to be polarizing. I assure you
that's not the case. Allow me five hundred words to make my case. I was a
chubby kid. Strike that, I was a jiggly shrimp. Skinny-fat. The kind of kid who
was relatively thin, yet managed to ma
=====
Why Liberals Are So Physically Monstrous And Repulsive...
https://www.returnofkings.com/118536/why-liberals-are-so-physically-monstrous-
and-repulsive
Liberals are not born uglier. They voluntarily remain ugly or become uglier to
fit a narrative. "Appearance is ideology". It takes a special kind of hypocrisy
to call something that is universally seen as ugly "beautiful" and vice-versa.
=====
12 Reasons Why Liberals And Progressives Will Always Be...
https://www.returnofkings.com/100887/12-reasons-why-liberals-and-progressives-
will-always-be-losers
Liberal men however are inexcusable, they are either effeminate enough to be
emotionally manipulated or are weak and yielding to social pressures. December
10, 2016 Take The Red Pill Don't forget that Liberal men are usually the
offspring of domineering feminists or divorced feminists and sometimes single
mothers.
=====
Men With Weak Upper Bodies Tend to Be Liberal - Physically Strong Men Tend to
Be Conservative
Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political
stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according
to a new study.
Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to
physical strength.
Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic
redistribution, according to the research.
The principal investigators - psychological scientists Michael Bang Petersen,
of Aarhus University in Denmark, and Daniel Sznycer, of the University of
California in the U.S., believe that the link may reflect psychological traits
that evolved in response to our early ancestral environments and continue to
influence behavior today.
Professor Petersen said: 'While many think of politics as a modern phenomenon,
it has - in a sense - always been with our species.'
In the days of our early ancestors, decisions about the distribution of
resources were not made in courthouses or legislative offices, but through
shows of strength.
With this in mind, Professor Petersen and Professor Sznycer hypothesized that
upper-body strength - a proxy for the ability to physically defend or acquire
resources - would predict men's opinions about the redistribution of wealth.