NewYorkTimes 11/19/12: Was there a pre-election spin to cover- up
Benghazi? You Betcha and even DemocRATS admit it now as long as no one
blames Obama or the WH.
"The chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said Sunday that
she planned to investigate why the C.I.A.’s quick determination of a
terrorist role in the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, Libya, was not
reflected in the “talking points” used days later on television by
Susan E. Rice, the ambassador to the United Nations. …
She said a transcript of testimony given a day after the attack by
David H. Petraeus, who was then director of the C.I.A., showed that
“Petraeus very clearly said that it was a terrorist attack.”
But asked whether President Obama or anyone working for him had
deliberately misled the public by characterizing the attack as
resulting from a spontaneous protest – to avoid invoking a terrorist
threat at a key point in the presidential campaign – she was adamant,
saying, “No, no...."”
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/feinstein-says-senate-will-investigate-benghazi-talking-points/?partner=rss&emc=rss
However, despite Feinstein's attempts at damage control, currently
appearing elsewhere:
"...the Presidential Daily Briefing made it clear... that the attack
did not arise from a spontaneous mob protesting a YouTube video, but
instead resulted from a planned, coordinated attack by radical
Islamist “extremists” with links to al-Qaeda..."
google "the attack did not arise from a spontaneous mob protesting a
YouTube video, but instead" if you wish to read it all from multiple
sources.
google: "game over for the administration’s defense of Susan Rice,
and of the President himself:" for more