Republicans vs Democrats in Launching Wars: We Have the Numbers
If one were to compare the US political system to a dystopian society divided
into distinct factions based on how many wars they have started, an interesting
outcome rebuking conventional perceptions would have been observed.
It is not about the strong on defense, hawkish Republicans juxtaposed with
peace-loving dovish Democrats anymore. Looking back at the past 118 years,
there have been some 'divergents'...
... warmongering Democrats and amicable Republicans.
However, more interestingly and surprising for the conventional-minded - the
number of the XX century Democratic presidents who kept from starting wars is
actually zero.
According to the research conducted by Sputnik, since the turn of the 20th
century - out of 8 Democrat presidents none have managed to stay away from
initiating military aggression.
In turn, out of 12 Republican leaders, two - Warren Harding and Gerald Ford -
have deviated from the generally accepted party reputation.
List of the US presidents since the beginning of the XX century:
https://cdn1.img.sputniknews.com/img/106294/60/1062946011_0:0:1024:512_768x0_80
_0_1_bb43b0bdb64b00e62c882c7c23c171d6.jpg.webp
Values and Wars
Rooted in American conservatism, the US Republican party - commonly referred to
as the GOP (abbreviation for Grand Old Party) - has always viewed strong
national DEFENSE as one of its core principles.
Online users visiting the GOP website today are encouraged to choose principles
that are most important to them. One of the options reads: "Military must be
strong and prepared to defend our shores."
Given the party's solid emphasis on military strength and national security,
it's not accidental the Republicans may be perceived as more eager to partake
in military endeavors with the US acting as the world's policeman.
One of the recent examples would be the 2003 Iraq invasion under the
administration of the Republican president George W. Bush. The conflict was
deemed to be over in 2011 but its consequences are still far from settled.
What one wouldn't normally consider is that advocates of socio-economic
equality and modern liberalism, aka the Democratic Party, would not produce a
war-free president in over a hundred years.
"Democrats believe that cooperation is better than conflict," the party's
online platform says.
However, contrary to the promoted tenet, the Democratic president Bill Clinton
in 1999 committed US forces to the war in then Yugoslavia, which lasted a
decade.
The bottom line is that the Democrats have been closely trailing the
Republicans in warmongering stakes.
So who started them, and who ended them?
The Korean War began and was fought under a Democrat. It was ended by a
Republican.
The Vietnam War began under one Democrat, escalated and spread beyond Vietnam
under his Democratic successor, and then under a Republican. It was ended by
another Republican.
The Persian Gulf War was entirely a Republican affair.
The Bosnian war and the bombing of Serbia were overseen by a Democrat.
The "war on terror" was started by a Republican who invaded Afghanistan and
Iraq and has continued for nearly 8 more years under a Democrat.
A 'peacetime US president' is a rarity, especially - during the Cold War, when
fear of the spread of communism in Latin America and not only - saw American
commanders-in-chief commit US troops all over the world.
The end of the Cold War did not bring respite to US war mongering. The country
has been at war almost continuously since then, and American forces are
actively engaged not only in the highly visible conflicts in Afghanistan, Iraq,
Syria and Yemen but also in Niger and Somalia as well as Jordan, Thailand and
beyond.
Regardless of who sat in the White House there was hardly a presidential term
in US history when the country was not at war.
It took a Republican Dwight Eisenhower to warn Americans of the corrupting
power of the military-industrial complex. And it was a Democrat Bill Clinton
who bombed Belgrade TV, designating journalists "legitimate targets".
============================================================================
Liberalism Really IS a Disease