Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Why are journalists and Indian women and lawyers so sexist and man-hating?
4 views
Skip to first unread message
peter zohrab
Jan 8, 2013, 1:12:18 AM1/8/13
to
According to the Hindustan Times (
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Crime-against-women-CJI-wants-fast-track-courts/Article1-986159.aspx
), the sexist scumbag, Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir, has asked
all high courts to set up fast track courts to deal exclusively with
offences against women. Why was this? It was because, he said, the
brutal gangrape and murder of Delhi girl has shaken the conscience of
the nation.
Oh, is that right, you discriminatory incompetent? Well, on 26 July
2012 the Hindu newspaper ( http://www.thehindu.com/news/states/andhra-pradesh/article3685655.ece
) reported that not one, but THREE people had just been stabbed to
death on a bus in Andhra Pradesh State, India, but there were
apparently NO demonstrations, NO international media coverage, and NO
demands by scum like you to set up special courts.
WHY was that? Well, only two of the names of the victims were
reported, but those names, Ajay and Niranjan, are both male names,
according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajay and
http://www.babycenter.com/baby-names-niranjan-510215.htm .
Obviously, if two or three MEN get killed on a bus, that is a matter
of absolutely no concern to discriminatory scumbags like Chief Justice
of India Altamas Kabir, but if one single woman gets raped and killed,
then all the feminist rent-a-crowds, all the feminist media in India,
Britain and New Zealand (to name just a few countries), and all the
gross incompetents in the sexist legal profession have a fit of
tantrums! One lawyers' association even refused to defend the
accused! How can you possibly know who was guilty of what unless you
have a fair trial, with every accused person properly defended? That
is mob rule. It is mob rule by lawyers! In India, obviously, the
lawyers are so uneducated that they do not understand the rule of law!
Peter Zohrab
http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Crime-against-women-CJI-wants-fast-track-courts/Article1-986159.aspx
), the sexist scumbag, Chief Justice of India Altamas Kabir, has asked
all high courts to set up fast track courts to deal exclusively with
offences against women. Why was this? It was because, he said, the
brutal gangrape and murder of Delhi girl has shaken the conscience of
the nation.
Oh, is that right, you discriminatory incompetent? Well, on 26 July
2012 the Hindu newspaper ( http://www.thehindu.com/news/states/andhra-pradesh/article3685655.ece
) reported that not one, but THREE people had just been stabbed to
death on a bus in Andhra Pradesh State, India, but there were
apparently NO demonstrations, NO international media coverage, and NO
demands by scum like you to set up special courts.
WHY was that? Well, only two of the names of the victims were
reported, but those names, Ajay and Niranjan, are both male names,
according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajay and
http://www.babycenter.com/baby-names-niranjan-510215.htm .
Obviously, if two or three MEN get killed on a bus, that is a matter
of absolutely no concern to discriminatory scumbags like Chief Justice
of India Altamas Kabir, but if one single woman gets raped and killed,
then all the feminist rent-a-crowds, all the feminist media in India,
Britain and New Zealand (to name just a few countries), and all the
gross incompetents in the sexist legal profession have a fit of
tantrums! One lawyers' association even refused to defend the
accused! How can you possibly know who was guilty of what unless you
have a fair trial, with every accused person properly defended? That
is mob rule. It is mob rule by lawyers! In India, obviously, the
lawyers are so uneducated that they do not understand the rule of law!
Peter Zohrab
♔ Turin Turambar ♔
Jan 8, 2013, 3:14:43 PM1/8/13
to
Women STILL aren't playing fair, even while the so-called leaders in the
Men's Movement have been refusing to go on the offensive. As a result,
Men as a sex are falling even further behind.
..."Unbelievable".
Fuck "honorable" approaches and ATTACK.
Attack TO WIN.
There is NO SUCH THING as "hard-wiring" in Men.
Obviously, I'm referring to attacking in the courts, and other legal
approaches. But, in the course of that, we should be playing the
nastiest, dirtiest form of hardball that we possibly can. We should
also be pushing the boundaries every chance we get.
The closest thing we have to hard-wiring dictates doing exactly as I'm
saying. Self-sacrificial chivalry is the unnatural socialization.
"I assure you that the most winning woman I ever knew was hanged for
poisoning three little children for their insurance-money, and the most
repellent man of my acquaintance is a philanthropist who has spent
nearly a quarter of a million upon the London poor." ~ Sherlock Holmes,
The Sign of the Four
> Peter Zohrab
>
- - -
One of millions of Angry Men:
Turin
I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/turin_turambar ∞
http://groups.google.com/group/Men_First/ ♂
https://profiles.google.com/TurinTurambar.1/ ⚕
------------------------
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
-----
Marxette Marx
Jan 8, 2013, 6:26:41 PM1/8/13
to
fight real battles in life, they think life is applecarts and buddy
systems an' people who violate the unwritten rules can be written off as
communists, well not anymore LOLOL
>
> Fuck "honorable" approaches and ATTACK.
>
> Attack TO WIN.
>
> There is NO SUCH THING as "hard-wiring" in Men.
>
> Obviously, I'm referring to attacking in the courts, and other legal
> approaches. But, in the course of that, we should be playing the
> nastiest, dirtiest form of hardball that we possibly can. We should
> also be pushing the boundaries every chance we get.
>
>
> The closest thing we have to hard-wiring dictates doing exactly as I'm
> saying. Self-sacrificial chivalry is the unnatural socialization.
>
for infiltration an' subversion so that every idea men's groups came up
with could be shot down from within :(
Marxette
Marcus Aurelius
Jan 8, 2013, 6:57:54 PM1/8/13
to
Thank you for the original post.
Feminist legislation has resulted in the explosion of men incarcerated
in the U.S.A. through the criminalization of conduct that women
consider to be inimical to their political, economic, and social
interests.
"Claiming to be the freest country on Earth, the United States
incarcerates a larger percentage of its population than Iran or Syria.
Over two million people,or nearly one in 50 adults, excluding the
elderly, are incarcerated, the highest proportion in the world. Some
seven million Americans, or 3.2 percent, are under penal
supervision.----
But traditionalists upholding law and order were not an innovation of
the 1970s. A newer and more militant force helped create the "carceral
state." In The Prison and the Gallows (2006), feminist scholar Marie
Gottschalk points out that traditional conservatives were not the
prime instigators, and blames "interest groups and social movements
not usually associated with penal conservatism." Yet, she names only
one: "the women's movement." (Feminist Gulag) Baskerville
In the United States, there are discriminatory sentencing disparities
against men.
In both the United Kingdom and the United States there is concern
about the extent to which there may be false accusations of rape.
Lenient sentences for false accusations and lack of anonymity for the
accused are also concerns.
Sentencing for those convicted of making false accusations of rape in
the United Kingdom is often perceived as being too lenient in
comparison to the severe penalties imposed upon rapists. (Wikipedia-
Mens Rights).
Men accused of rape today enjoy few safeguards. "People can be charged
with virtually no evidence," says Boston former sex-crimes prosecutor
Rikki Klieman. "If a female comes in and says she was sexually
assaulted, then on her word alone, with nothing else-- and I mean
nothing else, no investigation-- the police will go out and arrest
someone."
" A defendant who can absolutely prove his innocence--- can none the
less still be convicted, based solely on the word of the accuser,"
write Stuart Taylor and K.C. Johnson in Until Proven Innocent.
In North Carolina, simply "naming the person accused" along with the
time and place " will support a verdict of guilty. Crime laboratories
are notorious for falsifying results to obtain convictions.
(Baskerville- Feminist Gulag).
The feminist dogma that "women never lie" goes largely unchallenged.
"Any honest veteran sex assault investigator will tell you that rape
is one of the most falsely reported crimes, " says Craig Silverman, a
former Colorado prosecutor known for his zealous prosecutions. Purdue
University sociologist, Eugene Kanin, found that "41% of the total
disposed rape cases were officially declared false" during a nine-year
period, " that is by the complainant's admission that no rape had
occurred."
In the infamous Duke University lacrosse case, prosecutor Michael
Nifong suppressed exculpating evidence and prosecuted men he knew to
be innocent, according to Taylor and Johnson. Nifong, himself, was
eventually disbarred, but he had the willing accomplices among
assistant prosecutors, police, crime lab technicians, judges, the bar
and the media.
"Innocent men are arrested and even imprisoned as a result of bogus
claims, "writes Linda Fairstein, former head of the sex-crimes unit
for the Manhattan District Attorney, who estimates that half of all
reports are unfounded..
Innocence projects are almost wholly occupied with rape cases ( though
they try to disguise this fact). Yet no systematic investigation has
been undertaken by the media or civil libertarians into why so many
innocent citizens are so easily incarcerated on fabricated
allegations. The exoneration of the Duke students on obviously trumped-
up charges triggered few investigations-and no official ones- to
determine how widespread such rigged justice is against those unable
to garner media attention. (Baskerville-Feminist Gulag).
In many jurisdictions, alleged victims of rape are given anonymity
while this is not extended to the accused. The British government
announced plans to grant anonymity to the accused but withdrew plans
after criticism from campaign groups such as "Women Against
Rape." (Wikipedia-Mens Rights).
In most states in the United States, it is possible to get a
conviction for rape without corroborating evidence. Thus, the issue of
false accusations of rape is very serious. (Wikipedia Men's Rights)
In the current state of the law, men can and will, with just an
allegation,lose all of their money, their kids, their house, their
job, their respect, their self-respect, their friends, their standing
in the community, their families,;and, above all, their souls if a
woman decides, one day, in one minute, to snap and cast him into the
abyss of hell by calling 911 and lying.
When a police officer is called to the scene in a domestic dispute,
the statistics demonstrate that it is overwhelmingly the man in the
relationship who is arrested and not the woman.
It happens thousands of times a day in the USA.
With regards to any type of allegation of Domestic Violence (what
these types of cases are called), any Police Officer, Prosecutor, or
Lawyer will tell you that a woman's word is 100 times stronger than a
man's, even in the absence of any evidence to substantiate this. And,
the police officer will blindly arrest and the prosecutor will
doggedly pursue that man.
Other incarcerations are also attributable to feminism. The vast
preponderance of actual violent crime and substance abuse proceeds
from single-parent homes and fatherless children more than any other
factor far surpassing race and poverty. The explosion of single
parenthood is usually and resignedly blamed on paternal abandonment
with the only remedy being ever-more draconian but ineffective child
support "crackdowns." Yet no evidence indicates that the proliferation
of single-parent homes results from absconding fathers. If we accept
that single motherhood is precisely what feminists say it is-the
deliberate choice of their sexual revolution-it is then apparent that
sexual liberation lies behind not only these newfangled sexual
crimes,but also the larger trend of actual crime and incarceration.
Feminism is driving both the criminalization of the innocent and the
criminality of the guilty. (Baskerville-Gulag)
We will continue to fight a losing battle against crime,
incarceration, nd expansive government power until we confront the
sexual ideology that is driving not only family breakdown and the
ensuing social anomie but the criminalization of the male population.
Ever-more-repressive measures will only further erode freedom. Under a
leftist regime, conservatives must rethink their approach to crime and
punishment and their unwitting collusion with America's homegrown
Stalinists. (Baskerville-Feminist Gulag).
MEDIA COMPLICITY
The world of rape accusations displays features similar to other
feminist gender crimes; media invective against the accused,
government-paid "victim advocates" to secure convictions, and
intimidation of anyone who defends the accused.
Feminist legislation has resulted in the explosion of men incarcerated
in the U.S.A. through the criminalization of conduct that women
consider to be inimical to their political, economic, and social
interests.
"Claiming to be the freest country on Earth, the United States
incarcerates a larger percentage of its population than Iran or Syria.
Over two million people,or nearly one in 50 adults, excluding the
elderly, are incarcerated, the highest proportion in the world. Some
seven million Americans, or 3.2 percent, are under penal
supervision.----
But traditionalists upholding law and order were not an innovation of
the 1970s. A newer and more militant force helped create the "carceral
state." In The Prison and the Gallows (2006), feminist scholar Marie
Gottschalk points out that traditional conservatives were not the
prime instigators, and blames "interest groups and social movements
not usually associated with penal conservatism." Yet, she names only
one: "the women's movement." (Feminist Gulag) Baskerville
In the United States, there are discriminatory sentencing disparities
against men.
In both the United Kingdom and the United States there is concern
about the extent to which there may be false accusations of rape.
Lenient sentences for false accusations and lack of anonymity for the
accused are also concerns.
Sentencing for those convicted of making false accusations of rape in
the United Kingdom is often perceived as being too lenient in
comparison to the severe penalties imposed upon rapists. (Wikipedia-
Mens Rights).
Men accused of rape today enjoy few safeguards. "People can be charged
with virtually no evidence," says Boston former sex-crimes prosecutor
Rikki Klieman. "If a female comes in and says she was sexually
assaulted, then on her word alone, with nothing else-- and I mean
nothing else, no investigation-- the police will go out and arrest
someone."
" A defendant who can absolutely prove his innocence--- can none the
less still be convicted, based solely on the word of the accuser,"
write Stuart Taylor and K.C. Johnson in Until Proven Innocent.
In North Carolina, simply "naming the person accused" along with the
time and place " will support a verdict of guilty. Crime laboratories
are notorious for falsifying results to obtain convictions.
(Baskerville- Feminist Gulag).
The feminist dogma that "women never lie" goes largely unchallenged.
"Any honest veteran sex assault investigator will tell you that rape
is one of the most falsely reported crimes, " says Craig Silverman, a
former Colorado prosecutor known for his zealous prosecutions. Purdue
University sociologist, Eugene Kanin, found that "41% of the total
disposed rape cases were officially declared false" during a nine-year
period, " that is by the complainant's admission that no rape had
occurred."
In the infamous Duke University lacrosse case, prosecutor Michael
Nifong suppressed exculpating evidence and prosecuted men he knew to
be innocent, according to Taylor and Johnson. Nifong, himself, was
eventually disbarred, but he had the willing accomplices among
assistant prosecutors, police, crime lab technicians, judges, the bar
and the media.
"Innocent men are arrested and even imprisoned as a result of bogus
claims, "writes Linda Fairstein, former head of the sex-crimes unit
for the Manhattan District Attorney, who estimates that half of all
reports are unfounded..
Innocence projects are almost wholly occupied with rape cases ( though
they try to disguise this fact). Yet no systematic investigation has
been undertaken by the media or civil libertarians into why so many
innocent citizens are so easily incarcerated on fabricated
allegations. The exoneration of the Duke students on obviously trumped-
up charges triggered few investigations-and no official ones- to
determine how widespread such rigged justice is against those unable
to garner media attention. (Baskerville-Feminist Gulag).
In many jurisdictions, alleged victims of rape are given anonymity
while this is not extended to the accused. The British government
announced plans to grant anonymity to the accused but withdrew plans
after criticism from campaign groups such as "Women Against
Rape." (Wikipedia-Mens Rights).
In most states in the United States, it is possible to get a
conviction for rape without corroborating evidence. Thus, the issue of
false accusations of rape is very serious. (Wikipedia Men's Rights)
In the current state of the law, men can and will, with just an
allegation,lose all of their money, their kids, their house, their
job, their respect, their self-respect, their friends, their standing
in the community, their families,;and, above all, their souls if a
woman decides, one day, in one minute, to snap and cast him into the
abyss of hell by calling 911 and lying.
When a police officer is called to the scene in a domestic dispute,
the statistics demonstrate that it is overwhelmingly the man in the
relationship who is arrested and not the woman.
It happens thousands of times a day in the USA.
With regards to any type of allegation of Domestic Violence (what
these types of cases are called), any Police Officer, Prosecutor, or
Lawyer will tell you that a woman's word is 100 times stronger than a
man's, even in the absence of any evidence to substantiate this. And,
the police officer will blindly arrest and the prosecutor will
doggedly pursue that man.
Other incarcerations are also attributable to feminism. The vast
preponderance of actual violent crime and substance abuse proceeds
from single-parent homes and fatherless children more than any other
factor far surpassing race and poverty. The explosion of single
parenthood is usually and resignedly blamed on paternal abandonment
with the only remedy being ever-more draconian but ineffective child
support "crackdowns." Yet no evidence indicates that the proliferation
of single-parent homes results from absconding fathers. If we accept
that single motherhood is precisely what feminists say it is-the
deliberate choice of their sexual revolution-it is then apparent that
sexual liberation lies behind not only these newfangled sexual
crimes,but also the larger trend of actual crime and incarceration.
Feminism is driving both the criminalization of the innocent and the
criminality of the guilty. (Baskerville-Gulag)
We will continue to fight a losing battle against crime,
incarceration, nd expansive government power until we confront the
sexual ideology that is driving not only family breakdown and the
ensuing social anomie but the criminalization of the male population.
Ever-more-repressive measures will only further erode freedom. Under a
leftist regime, conservatives must rethink their approach to crime and
punishment and their unwitting collusion with America's homegrown
Stalinists. (Baskerville-Feminist Gulag).
MEDIA COMPLICITY
The world of rape accusations displays features similar to other
feminist gender crimes; media invective against the accused,
government-paid "victim advocates" to secure convictions, and
intimidation of anyone who defends the accused.
♔ Turin Turambar ♔
Jan 9, 2013, 7:08:14 AM1/9/13
to
Zohrab pulls his punches because he's a feminist. His "resource"
websites are mostly links to useless garbage, and, are simply designed
to give the impression that he is one of us.
>> Fuck "honorable" approaches and ATTACK.
>>
>> Attack TO WIN.
>>
>> There is NO SUCH THING as "hard-wiring" in Men.
>>
>> Obviously, I'm referring to attacking in the courts, and other legal
>> approaches. But, in the course of that, we should be playing the
>> nastiest, dirtiest form of hardball that we possibly can. We should
>> also be pushing the boundaries every chance we get.
>>
>>
>> The closest thing we have to hard-wiring dictates doing exactly as I'm
>> saying. Self-sacrificial chivalry is the unnatural socialization.
>>
>
> The whole hard wiring thing was written long ago by feminist think tanks
> for infiltration an' subversion so that every idea men's groups came up
> with could be shot down from within :(
a lot of it goes in their own counter-insurgent groups.
For example, watching Paul Elam and Tom Smith systematically wear down
weakling groups, like Men's Rights Online, in order to take them over
just amounts to cannibalization of their own. Of course, when you're
dealing with Jewish hate tactics, like theirs, sometimes that's just for
public display...
Marxette Marx
Jan 9, 2013, 12:15:27 PM1/9/13
to
looked like one of those old geocities websites w simple html design an'
no effort at appeal or content. It's just a token effort like paul
elam's projects except everything on paul's sites is glitzy appeal an'
empty content. He reminds me of the coast to coast nuts LOL
>
>>> Fuck "honorable" approaches and ATTACK.
>>>
>>> Attack TO WIN.
>>>
>>> There is NO SUCH THING as "hard-wiring" in Men.
>>>
>>> Obviously, I'm referring to attacking in the courts, and other legal
>>> approaches. But, in the course of that, we should be playing the
>>> nastiest, dirtiest form of hardball that we possibly can. We should
>>> also be pushing the boundaries every chance we get.
>>>
>>>
>>> The closest thing we have to hard-wiring dictates doing exactly as I'm
>>> saying. Self-sacrificial chivalry is the unnatural socialization.
>>>
>>
>> The whole hard wiring thing was written long ago by feminist think tanks
>> for infiltration an' subversion so that every idea men's groups came up
>> with could be shot down from within :(
>
>
> I know. But, something that's both funny and sickening about it is that
> a lot of it goes in their own counter-insurgent groups.
>
> For example, watching Paul Elam and Tom Smith systematically wear down
> weakling groups, like Men's Rights Online, in order to take them over
> just amounts to cannibalization of their own. Of course, when you're
> dealing with Jewish hate tactics, like theirs, sometimes that's just for
> public display...
>
to do while they build a bigger monolith of allies for the open feminist
groups. The tactic works by stereotypes, all it takes to break a men's
group is one silly sacred stereotype an' the group will be taken over.
Usually it's a group of them together like consumerism or the
traditional family, but it's the stereotypes not the cause --a
ideological group will never go down-- that are your Achilles heel.
The tactic can be beaten by rejecting all stereotypes. It always come
back to 'what if you were on a desert island?' Turin, when the emphasis
is on your ideas not the lifestyles the feminists like polishblackguy
and jew elam can't impersonate enough of you to talk their way into your
control rooms the way fathers4justice an' all the others were taken over :)
0 new messages