UnderCover Mosque: The Return (video in 5 parts)
simple.lan...@gmail.com
repo
Lots of info on the videos,
Mosques are no more than a major avenue
for Islam to destroy their host countries,
they're teaching our own children to kill anyone
who is in opposition to Islam behind those closed mosque
doors. Stop building mosques, either monitor those
that exist now or lock the doors permanently.
IRS locks doors all the time, lock those doors where
they preach and teach the overtake of the USofAmerican
gov. Enough.
Michael Laudahn eOpposition
Let's share it with some more viewers.
<simple.lan...@gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:72b9a46e-02a0-409b...@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
ßDoüg±Ç
news:16e311af-1b8f-46f8...@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
*******************
Kc, you read the story about the muslims in Baghdad using a mosque
as a torture chamber right? I've heard muslims regularly use mosques
as armories -- hiding weapons in them. Muslims are sanctimonious liars.
*us*
Ariadne
Well, it certainly is a horror movie.
But the horror reality is well-laid out
at:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch
Svenne
<tz81...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>"Mein lieber Schwan" is either plain stupid or he is plain stupid:
>> That's interesting.
>> It's beginning to look like he is a Muzzie nut job.
>"What is a "Muzzie". Why do you insists that I must be an insect?
>There are effective treatments to be had for that kind of mental
>disease, you know?
A Muzzie is somebody daft enough to believe the Izlam crap.
>> He goes around attacking anything and anyone critical of Izlam and
>> called a serious TV documentary about Izlamic intolerance "youtube
>> bullshit" and tried to censor it from usenet.
>Serious documentary? What "serious" documentary?
>On youtube? ROTFLOL. Get a life, mate!
It was a serious and disturbing documentary made by a responsible
reporting team.
>There is quite a difference between being a "hate monger" and being
>critical of something.
>Your problem is that you do not understand the difference.
>And I do not apologize for attacking hate mongers, specially those who
>are arrogantly troll in aus.politics.
All the hating in the documentary came from mad Muzzies. You should
try watching it.
Here it is again:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOIYkLWY4Fc
>BTW do you seriously believe that I would be so omnipotent as to be
>able to censor anything on Usenet at will?
>None the less, you must also prove that I had personally censored
>Usenet material before and I'll bet you can't.
You go around snipping links in a demented attempt to try and stop the
spread of material critical of Izlam.
>> It certainly looks like Mullah Ördög is a mad Muzzie.
It certainly does.
Svenne
Ördög
> Ördög concluded:
> >"Mein lieber Schwan" is either plain stupid or he is plain stupid:
> A Muzzie is somebody daft enough to believe the Izlam crap.
And what does that got to do with me? I do not believe any religious
crap. ANY! Full stop.
That is what makes me an atheist. I do not believe in sky fairies.
How many more times do I have to declare that.
Gosh, you must have a thick skull which prevents new ideasfrom
penetrating it.
Let me put it this way:
I do not regard the question of religion as such a really relevant
topic to political Newsgroups (apart from when some powerful right
wing religious loonies start to push nations towards engaging in war
and mindless destruction (examples: USA, Somalia, Sudan, Iran and
Afghanistan).
The proper place for discussions related to matters of religion are
the dedicated religious and skeptic/atheist NGs.
There are two main concerns I have that motivates me to post comments
to UK groups which I would completely ignore otherwise:
The platform they provide for the activities of extremist trolls of
all sorts and the social destructiveness of right wing political
extremism.
> >> "youtube bullshit" and tried to censor it from usenet.
> >Serious documentary? What "serious" documentary?
> >On youtube? ROTFLOL. Get a life, mate!
> It was a serious and disturbing documentary made by a responsible
> reporting team.
Amazing!
But if they were so reliable and serious they could have found a more
proper and respectable forum to release it other than just dump it on
"youtube".
Why do think real and detailed scientific work is not regularly
released in the boulevard press?
Why do you think all scientists push themselves as hard as they can to
be able to release their works in "Nature" or "Blood" or "Lancet"
instead?
> >There is quite a difference between being a "hate monger" and being
> >critical of something.
> >Your problem is that you do not understand the difference.
> >And I do not apologize for attacking hate mongers, specially those who
> >are arrogantly troll in aus.politics.
> All the hating in the documentary came from mad Muzzies.
Have you ever heard of selective and one sided editing?
Man you are so gullible!
Have you never heard that facts can be manipulated without actually
saying a single word of lie.
> You should
> try watching it.
> Here it is again:
> www.youtube.com/watch-bullshit.....No, thank you!
LOL.
How much are you willing to pay for my time that would be completely
wasted on a website that is at best only suited for the cheapest forms
of entertainment that can be found anywhere for the dumbed down
masses?
What next? Do you want me to watch "Big Brother" too?
Spam link removed.
Don't you think it is enough within a single thread to posts a link
only once.
Why repeat it ad nauseam?
Look, Usenet was never meant to be a forum for the purpose of endless
repetition of propaganda.
> >BTW do you seriously believe that I would be so omnipotent as to be
> >able to censor anything on Usenet at will?
> >None the less, you must also prove that I had personally censored
> >Usenet material before and I'll bet you can't.
> You go around snipping links in a demented attempt to try and stop the
> spread of material critical of Izlam.
See above. No one here in this forum is obliged to propagate someone
else's propaganda links.
That is not censorship....that is plain common sense.
If you want to push your propaganda go and do rounds of letter box
drops (also known as junk mail),
or pay big money to have an ugly full page ad in one of the major
daily papers.
You are definitely using the wrong medium.
> It certainly does.
What certain is that you are less than bright!
If you were a real liberal and not just a fake one you would be
directing your wreath against all extremists in our western society
not just those you have chosen personally not to like.
I am fighting the real fight against all types of right-wing extremism
here while you are indulging yourself in grand delusions of
impartiality.
Ördög
(The friendly Hungarian Devil in service of aus.politics and Usenet)
Either the neocons go or civilisation does!
ßDoüg±Ç
guess Svenne really got to you w/that last post didn't he?
The French Resistance knew how to deal w/nazi collaborators
as well as nazis. The islamonazi day of reckoning is coming
Whoredog.
"Ördög" <tz81...@sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:ef12961a-27c9-4dd5...@q26g2000prq.googlegroups.com...
Svenne
<tz81...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>"Mein lieber Schwan" is out chasing a mirage:
>> Ördög concluded:
>> >"Mein lieber Schwan" is either plain stupid or he is plain stupid:
>
>> A Muzzie is somebody daft enough to believe the Izlam crap.
>
>And what does that got to do with me? I do not believe any religious
>crap. ANY! Full stop.
>That is what makes me an atheist. I do not believe in sky fairies.
>How many more times do I have to declare that.
>Gosh, you must have a thick skull which prevents new ideasfrom
>penetrating it.
For an atheist you spend an awful lot of time defending Izlam and
slagging off those who dare to be critical of it.
>Let me put it this way:
>I do not regard the question of religion as such a really relevant
>topic to political Newsgroups (apart from when some powerful right
>wing religious loonies start to push nations towards engaging in war
>and mindless destruction (examples: USA, Somalia, Sudan, Iran and
>Afghanistan).
I don't recall ever having called for war. Quite the opposite,
actually.
>The proper place for discussions related to matters of religion are
>the dedicated religious and skeptic/atheist NGs.
What is happening with Izlam goes beyond theology. When Muzlims call
for gays and unbelievers to be killed and so called "moderate" Mosques
preach hate and intolerance, together with the growing power and
influence of Izlam, then it becomes a social and political issue.
>There are two main concerns I have that motivates me to post comments
>to UK groups which I would completely ignore otherwise:
>The platform they provide for the activities of extremist trolls of
>all sorts and the social destructiveness of right wing political
>extremism.
But you consider it OK for Muzlims to preach hate and intolerance and
that those who draw attention to this fact should be called "fascists"
and silenced.
>> >Serious documentary? What "serious" documentary?
>> >On youtube? ROTFLOL. Get a life, mate!
>
>> It was a serious and disturbing documentary made by a responsible
>> reporting team.
>
>Amazing!
>But if they were so reliable and serious they could have found a more
>proper and respectable forum to release it other than just dump it on
>"youtube".
The documentary was originally shown by the British TV company Channel
4. After national broadcast someone posted it on Youtube.
>Why do think real and detailed scientific work is not regularly
>released in the boulevard press?
>Why do you think all scientists push themselves as hard as they can to
>be able to release their works in "Nature" or "Blood" or "Lancet"
>instead?
The documentary was serious and caused much discussion and concern in
the UK after national TV broadcast.
You should try watching it before you slag it off:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOIYkLWY4Fc
>> All the hating in the documentary came from mad Muzzies.
>Have you ever heard of selective and one sided editing?
>Man you are so gullible!
>Have you never heard that facts can be manipulated without actually
>saying a single word of lie.
That's what UK police said about the first part of the documentary,
that selective editing made it hate speech and they started legal
proceeding against the TV company. The Crown Prosecution Service said
they couldn't prosecute Chanel 4 for broadcasting the documentary. The
police then reported Chanel 4 to Ofcom, the national arbiter of TV
impartiality. Ofcom threw out the police complaint and the police were
forced to pay damages to the producers and publicly apologise.
www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/nov/19/channel4.ofcom
>What certain is that you are less than bright!
>If you were a real liberal and not just a fake one you would be
>directing your wreath against all extremists in our western society
>not just those you have chosen personally not to like.
>I am fighting the real fight against all types of right-wing extremism
>here while you are indulging yourself in grand delusions of
>impartiality.
Yet you consider it OK to protect and defend Muzlims who call for
hate, intolerance and murder and call those who draw attention to the
danger of religious hate mongers "fascists."
You are either an extremely stupid hypocrite or a closet Muzzie.
Svenne
bernoul...@yahoo.com
> Yet you consider it OK to protect and defend Muzlims who call for
> hate, intolerance and murder and call those who draw attention to the
> danger of religious hate mongers "fascists."
As has been shown - there's few people on usenet more fascistic or
hate-mongering than "Ördög".
>
> You are either an extremely stupid hypocrite or a closet Muzzie.
He's certainly proven himself the former - he recently stated that
anyone who disagrees with his mad ravings or dares to criticise him
"represents the total degeneration of civilisation".
He's a foaming, impotent meglomaniac.
>
> Svenne
Svenne
<tz81...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>Look, it would aid this exchange immensely if you had actually read my
>posts before you responded.
Your posts consist of jumping on anyone who is critical of Islam,
attacking and trashing anything referred to which is critical of Islam
by branding it as "hate speech" without any attempt to adress content
as well as trying to delete and surpress any links to anything
critical of Islam.
You really don't have much credibility.
Svenne
ßDoüg±Ç
the real threat to civilization.
<bernoul...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b9512dac-5275-4c4c...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
ßDoüg±Ç
news:gej1c4h8r746bi49n...@4ax.com...
Great post Svenne.
I believe Whoredog is a lying muslime pig (practicing Al Taqiyya)
or a paid islamonazi shill.
You've heard of course, about how the Canadian surrender monkeys
charged Mark Steyn w/a hate crime for writing a book critical of Islam?
Steyn beat the charges and has since immigrated to the US.
Svenne
<tz81...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>This is not our first encounter, so you should know by now that I am
>intolerant towards political extremism including the Islamic one.
>I have stated further above in the thread that purely religious
>matters do not belong into political NGs and I stand by that
>statement.
Discussion of Islam goes far beyond mere theological discussion.
The fact that Islam is an ideology with socio-political aims, is
rabidly intolerant, advocates violence and repression and is rapidly
growing in Europe is certainly something that warrents discussing in
political newsgroups and not be dismissed with a cursory "hate content
snipped" in an empty follow up post with altered reply adresses, which
is your usual modus operandi.
Certainly mad Nazis like Laudahn are hateful and dangerous lunatics,
but so are the Muslin hate preachers presented in the TV documentary
you cursorily dismissed as "propaganda."
Fascism is fascism and is dangerous wether it is the demented racist
kind represented by Laudahn or the insane theocratic kind represented
by Islam.
Svenne
bernoul...@yahoo.com
> oulli_ba...@ybu-hoo.com rushes onto the barricades:
>
> > As has been shown - there's few people on usenet more fascistic or
> > hate-mongering than "Ördög".
> > anyone who disagrees with his mad ravings or dares to criticise him
> > "represents the total degeneration of civilisation".
> > He's a foaming, impotent meglomaniac.
>
Not a word that comes to mind when considering you...
> Have I found your soar spot?
"soar" LOL. No, more like I have found the sweet spot - you simply
prove what I've been saying all along!
To you, tyhe word "necone" merely means someone you disagree with.
After all - you can't give any examples of posts from me containing
"neocon" sentiments, as we have already established. HOw fascistic of
you
> Have I stepped on your "neocon" sensitivities thereby unleashing your
> rightard conservative wreath?
I'm neither right wing nor conservative.
You, on the other hand, ARE a proven liar, fascist, coward and mental
case:
viz:
> On Jul 25, 5:38 pm, parri...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > On 25 Juli, 03:50, Ördög <tz81qm...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
> > > Speak for yourself hate filled Polish simpleton.
> > Silly xenophobic bigot..
> Why? For pointing out that he is not American, as he would have
> readers believe?
> He is a fraud.......no wonder you rush to his defence.
You're lying again, Doggyboy. Pointing out your myriad faults is not
defending anyone.
> He-he. Your silly crap does not stick to Teflon......
Still waiting for you to apologise for your lie that I have ever made
posts containing "extreme right wing, religious nutcase or Neo Nazi"
views, Doggyboy! Keep on running :-)
> > > > can either surrender to Islam,
> > > NOT an OPTION....NOR it is a necessity!
> > > > or defeat it and de-Islamize the world.
> > > Oooops. Another attempt at an "Endlösung"
> > > Nor you nor anyone else can eradicate a religion...any religion....by
> > > brute force.
> > > Only violent political morons, like the Nazis and your lot would dream
> > > about such possibility.
> > ..or someone with a .sig reading "either the <insert meaningless
> > epithet here> go or civilisation does!", eh, cowardly, lying bigoted
> > dog?
> My my. So you reckon NEOCON is just a meaningless epiphet?
When used by you, yes. After all, YOU certainly can't explain why you
mean by it.
> www.belacquajones.com/dictionary.php
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neocon
> en.wiktionary.org/wiki/neocon
> More amazing since you are one of them.....a neocon, that's right a
> NEOCON.
,,and that rather nicely confirms my statement above, and reveals
your dishonesty again. This really is TOO easy..
What "neocon" views have I ever expressed, Doggyboy?
Your wriggling goes here:
> Did you hear? A NEOCON....a NEOCON......a Neocon....a neocon.
> This is your Achilles heel, ain't that so? That is why you are up in
> arms.
> Boooooo.
> Neocon, neocon, neocon, neocon, enocon, neocon,neocon, enocon, neocon
> Neocon, neocon, neocon, neocon, enocon, neocon,neocon, enocon, neocon
> Neocon, neocon, neocon, neocon, enocon, neocon,neocon, enocon, neocon
> Neocon, neocon, neocon, neocon, enocon, neocon,neocon, enocon, neocon
> Neocon, neocon, neocon, neocon, enocon, neocon,neocon, enocon, neocon
LOL. Did you have your hands over your ears when you were saying
that,Doggyboy?
> > Keep running, little lying man!
> I am running nowhere, Mr Neocon.
Oh yes you are! You've been lying about me expressing "right wing
extremist, religious extremists or Nazi" views, and now you're lying
about me expressing "neocon views", when all I've done is point out
what a bigoted idiot you are... and now you're throwing a new lie
into the mix! That I am a "neocon"..
> Time is in my favour.
> You prove that my sig is quite correct. You represent the total
> degeneration of civilisation.
And here you show your Nazi-like ideology most clearly. Anyone who
disagrees with you or points out your lies and bigotry "represents
the total degeneration of civilisation".
Hilarious!
> Luckily the generational change as the baby boomers hit the compost
> will take care of your sort in a painless way.
> Then and only then one might hope for a better future.
> Ördög
> (The insane Hungarian lying bigot in service of aus.politics and Usenet)
> Either the neocons go or civilisation does!
> PS:
> You can buzz off
Feeling sensitive again eh, Doggy? Awww!
> because all further posts of yours will be met with
> utter ridicule.
Of course - after all, you want to run away from the unpleasant facts
about you I highlight in them :-)
> Ranting, whinging and throwing verbal cartwheels will only make you
> look more ridiculous.-
I remain safe in the knowledge that, whatever I do, I will never
appear as ridiculous as you, Doggyboy.
FACE
bernoul...@yahoo.com in glistered weave wrote large for all to see:
The doggy in the merino jackboots stands alone in his fascistic hatred of
everyone not him. He has his precedents in history though.......
defeated in the ignominy they deserved...........:-)
FACE
Ariadne
Ariadne
> On 2 Sep, 16:45, simple.language.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
>
* part 2:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=j21OSS5G39k
* part 3:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=bcd5jcxCRCA
* part 4:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fd2atmHJQN4
* part 5:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=lsg2UDnC6Y4
*
* Let's keep it in plain view.
FACE
<odbo...@sneakemail.com>, wrote
>On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:08:17 -0400, in uk.politics.misc, FACE <AFaceIn...@today.net>, wrote
>>The doggy in the merino jackboots stands alone in his fascistic hatred of
>>everyone not him. He has his precedents in history though.......
>>defeated in the ignominy they deserved...........:-)
>> FACE
>
>ROTFLOL
I hear that a modest man is capable of laughing at himself.
You show yourself to be very modest, and you have good reason to be....
FACE
bernoul...@yahoo.com
> bernoulli etc etc etc
> <snip>
> Sorry I haven't realized that was dealing with jet
I've already got my props...
>an other sockpuppet.
> Next time I'll be more observant before responding to replicate
> posters.
You mean - you have been throroughly humiliated and exposed as a
fascist, but your poor little ego can't take it so you're going to run
and hide rather than face your mistake and make amends for it. Why are
all you fascists so gutless, I wonder?
Still, thanks for dancing to my tune and proving me right , yet again!
bernoul...@yahoo.com
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:24:26 -0700 (PDT), Ördög
>
Or the rabid "either the necons go or civilisation does" nonsense
spouted by Ordog. Especially when he has proven himself utterly inable
to define "neocon" as anything other than "one who disgarees with
Ördög or points out his myriad logical failings". He's merely taking
the "Jewish Bolshevik Conspiracy" moonbat screed and applied it to his
imaginary opponents.
He's merely the flip-side of the Laudmauth coin. But is too stupid and/
or dishonest to realise..
simple.lan...@gmail.com
> Discussion of Islam goes far beyond mere theological discussion.
>
> The fact that Islam is an ideology with socio-political aims, is
> rabidly intolerant, advocates violence and repression and is rapidly
> growing in Europe is certainly something that warrents discussing in
> political newsgroups and not be dismissed with a cursory "hate content
> snipped" in an empty follow up post with altered reply adresses, which
> is your usual modus operandi.
>
> Certainly mad Nazis like Laudahn are hateful and dangerous lunatics,
> but so are the Muslin hate preachers presented in the TV documentary
> you cursorily dismissed as "propaganda."
>
> Fascism is fascism and is dangerous wether it is the demented racist
> kind represented by Laudahn or the insane theocratic kind represented
> by Islam.
I agree. Islam is a supremacist ideology disguised as a religion. Our
main problem is that the kuffars are not smart enough to debunk the
disguise.
____________________________
At least 75% of the Sira (life of Mohammed) is about jihad. About 67%
of the Koran written in Mecca is about the unbelievers, or politics.
Of the Koran of Medina, 51% is devoted to the unbelievers. About 20%
of Bukhari’s Hadith is about jihad and politics. Religion is the
smallest part of Islamic foundational texts. source:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1701
In an Al-Jazeera survey on September 11, 2006, 49.9% of the
respondents avowed that they did indeed support Osama bin Laden.
source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=7D7F068C-A249-487E-A0D9-AD1593F2AF2D
65.2% Muslims favor Caliphate, 65.5% Muslims favor strict Sharia law
in every Islamic country: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=28064
(Only the Caliph can wage offensive jihad and offensive jihad is his
main duty.)
"Fascism was the first and prime instance of a modern political
religion… This religion sacralized the state and assigned it the
primary educational task of transforming the mentality, the character,
and the customs of Italians. The aim was to create a 'new man,' a
believer in and an observing member of the cult of Fascism." - Emilio
Gentile
In Cologne, the children receiving meals from the Nazi state during
the Second World War had to pray before the meal, “Fold your hands,
bow your head and think about Adolf Hitler. He gives us our daily
bread and helps us out of every misery” (source: "National Socialism
as Religion" by Thomas Schirrmacher, http://www.contra-mundum.org/schirrmacher/NS_Religion.pdf)
The translators of Mein Kampf said, “Hitler attempted to make himself
the ‘prophet’ of the new German religion…. He believed that if a new
‘myth’ could be created and propagated as stubbornly, it would give
Germans a new faith which the masses would cherish as tenaciously as
they previously followed Christianity.” source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/SujitDas/Heil-Hitler-Heil-Muhammad.htm
"There is no moderate Islam. There are Muslims who are passive, who
don't always follow the rules of Islam, but there's really only one
Islam, defined as submission to the will of God. There's nothing
moderate about it… How naive is the self-deception of the West to
continue to talk of moderate Islam?… The Western mind-set — that if we
respect them, they’re going to respect us, that if we indulge and
appease and condone and so on, the problem will go away — is
delusional. We're trying to appease Islam, but we are headed for a
terrible confrontation between fascist Islam and Right-wing fascists
who will step in when liberals fail to do so… This is the beginning of
a challenge with no possible compromise. There is no bargain that can
be struck when the question at hand is one of basic human rights." -
Ayaan Hirsi Ali (She lives in the USA and is the first refugee from
Western Europe since the Holocaust.)
"My criticsim of the West, especially of liberals, is that they take
freedom for granted." - Ayaan Hirsi Ali
ßDoüg±Ç
news:82df9f79-4d1c-4fb7...@i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> FACE
>
> ROTFLOL
LYAIPTA more likely.
simple.lan...@gmail.com
"Islam forbids reformation." - Hossain Salahuddin
The Golden Rule does not apply to Islam. Indeed, Islam denies the
truth of the Golden Rule. The duality of Islam divides all humanity
into Muslims and kafirs. There are no two groups more unequal than
kafirs and Muslims… To reform the Koran, all of the hateful, cruel,
and bigoted references to kafirs would have to be removed. If the
kafir material is removed, then only 39% of the Koran remains. The
greatest part of the part of the Koran, 61%, is devoted to negativity
about kafirs. The Sira (the life of Mohammed) has about 75% of its
material devoted to jihad. The Hadith has 20% of its material devoted
to jihad. There is no one positive reference to kafirs. If you delete
61% of the Koran, 75% of the Sira and 20% of the Hadith, you will have
reformed Islam. You will also have destroyed it. There is a very good
reason that Islam has never been reformed. It is impossible. source:
http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=76B12F33-3165-47D1-80ED-C3F1ACD07D8A
“Muslims who share the same goals as Osama bin Laden but are pursuing
them through non-violent means are celebrated by gullible Westerners
as moderates.” - Robert Spencer
“Jihad is holy fighting in Allah’s Cause with full force of numbers
and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of
its pillars. By Jihad Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made
superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and
Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad (may Allah protect us from
that) Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position;
their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority
vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who
tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart
wish to fulfill this duty, dies as a hypocrite.” sources:
1. http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/59458,
2. Koran 2:190 Footnote, King Fahd Complex translation
3. page 580 of the Islamic University of Medina’s translation of Sahih
al-Bukhari’s Hadith; it opens Bukhari’s Book of Jihad
Imam al-Ghazzali (d. 1111), the greatest Sufi master, Islamic
intellectual, and revivalist of Islam, who is considered the second-
greatest Muslim after Prophet Muhammad, wrote of Jihad: "One must go
on Jihad at least once a year… One may use a catapult against them
when they are in a fortress, even if among them are women and
children. One may set fire on them and/or drown them… One may cut down
their trees… One must destroy their useful book [Bible, Torah etc.].
Jihadists may take as booty whatever they decide…" source:
http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=1816
In verse 9:5 Allah tells the Muslims that after the four sacred months
(Rajab, Zulqad, ZulHajj, Muharram) have passed, slay (fight and kill)
the pagans wherever they are found. Ibn Kathir writes that this means,
the earth in general. That means this verse is not meant only for the
Meccans pagans; it applicable all around the globe, even today.
Echoing ibn Kathir, Jalalyn and ibn Abbas further say: Do not wait
until you find them, seek and besiege them in their areas and forts,
gather intelligence about them in various roads and fairways and force
them to Islam. If they do not embrace Islam, then kill them. This
verse allowed Muslims to fight the non-Muslims until they embrace
Islam. These verses allowed fighting people unless and until, they
embrace Islam and implement its rulings and obligations. Allah
mentioned the most important aspects of Islam here, including what is
less important. If they repent and become believers then forgive them.
There, in the above paragraph, we read the true spirit of Islam, as
per the immortal exegetes of the Qur’an. According to the most Qur’an
scholars this verse (9:5) is known as the verse of the sword (ayat
saif); this verse alone cancels about 124 verses that espouse mercy,
tolerance and forgiveness to the pagans… Islam cannot be reformed.
Muhammad himself has banned any reformation to Islam. Reforming Islam
is not a new idea. From time to time Islamist Scholars have attempted
to reform Islam. They have failed. You might have heard of the group
called Mutazzilites. Their sincere attempt to reform Islam in or
around the ninth and tenth century had failed miserably. Many such
Mutazillites faced severe Islamic punishment for bringing innovation
(bidah) in Islam. Introducing innovation in Islam is a serious crime,
according to Ghazali. Whoever, brings in such a reform is subject to
Islamic punitive measure, which is death. Today, Islam is fossilized
in the seventh century Bedouin Arab customs upon which Muhammad had
founded Islam… Islam is at perpetual war with the non-Islamic world
(the Qur’an 4:76, 60:4). Those who read the Qur’an and ahadith
(Muhammad’s deeds and traditions) and want to emulate them… must hate
the non-Muslims, humiliate them, distrust them, deceive them at every
opportunity, and kill them when the situation is appropriate. This is
the stipulation of the central doctrine of Islam. A Muslim who does
not emulate this cardinal premise of Islam is not a Muslim at all…
Killing, assassination, terrorism and bloodshed are the DNA codes of
Islam… Terrified, many non-Muslims often ask: what do the Islamist
terrorists want? They want to convert the entire world into an Islamic
Paradise… In reality, it means imposing on the non-Muslims (or the non-
Arabs) the Arabic and Bedouin culture (also known as Islam) by force,
murder and terrorism… Islamic terrorism is not going to end soon… As
long as there are PC politicians, and as long as the world depends
upon the so-called moderate Muslims to extinguish this menace, nothing
will happen… We must recognize that the real enemy is not the
terrorists. Rather, it is Islam. source:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID=2297E37D-87C3-492E-8E5D-1808AF77F703
In an Al-Jazeera survey on September 11, 2006, 49.9% of the
respondents avowed that they did indeed support Osama bin Laden.
source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=7D7F068C-A249-487E-A0D9-AD1593F2AF2D
65.2% Muslims favor Caliphate, 65.5% Muslims favor strict Sharia law
in every Islamic country: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=28064
(Only the Caliph can wage offensive jihad and offensive jihad is his
main duty.)
"To say that moderate Islam is the solution to radical Islam implies
several things: that moderate Islam exists; that it represents the
true (though perhaps currently disregarded) norm of Islam; and that
radical Islam is a departure from that norm." - Lawrence Auster
Muslim activists emphasize that Islam is a religion of peace. They say
that “Islam” is derived from the Arabic word “Salam,” meaning peace,
while Islam, in fact, means “Surrender” (to the will of Allah). To
prove that Islam stands for peace, Muslims often quote certain verses
out of the early period of the Quranic revelation. Here are some of
them. “Let there be no compulsion in religion.” Surah 2: 256 “And have
patience with what they (opponents) say, and leave them with noble
(dignity).” Surah 73:10 However, what Muslim advocates deliberately
fail to say is that the peaceful verses from the Meccan period have
been abrogated (nullified) and replaced by the militant verses of the
Medinan period. These verses were written after Mohammed moved to
Medina, abandoned his peaceful approach and resorted to using the
sword. As an example of the abrogation, 124 verses of the Quran that
call for tolerance, peace, and patience have been canceled and
replaced by this one single verse: "Fight and slay the Pagans wherever
ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them
in every stratagem (of war.)” Surah 9:5 source: "The Islamization of
America" by Abdullah Al-Araby, http://infidelnation.org/DOWNLOADS/TheIslamizationofAmericaTheIsl.zip
The Quran’s later, more violent passages abrogate its earlier,
peaceful ones. This concept, called nasikh wa-l-mansukh, has
effectively diminished the influence of the peaceful verses… The
concept of al-fikr kufr (is) the idea that the very act of thinking
(fikr) makes one an infidel (kufr)… Dr. Wafa Sultan in the US, Abdul
Fatah in Egypt, and many others have received and continue to receive
death threats. Recently, Dr. Nawal Al-Sadawi, a liberal Muslim thinker
and women’s rights activist, was forced to flee Egypt because of her
public statements. Dr. Rashad Khalifa was murdered in the United
States after he published his own re-interpretation of the Quran which
was less violent than was traditional. In Egypt, Dr. Faraq Fuddah was
shot to death after publishing condemnations of Jihadists. Egyptian
Nobel Prize winner Najib Mahfouz was stabbed in the neck for writing
his novel, Awlad Haretna, perceived by Salafists as blasphemous. -
Tawfiq Hamid, source: http://www.futureofmuslimworld.com/printVersion/print_pub.asp?pubID=63
This idea of abrogation was concocted to deal with the many
contradictions in the Koran. source: http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/004246.php
When Hina Saleem’s father cuts her throat, buries her in the yard, and
faces her head towards Mecca before rigamortis sets in –– for the sin
of loving an Italian man –– and most of the Islamic organizations in
Europe (from the Union of Islamic Communities in Italy to the Islamic
Cultural Association in Brescia) defend the murderer, not the victim,
you do not have to conscript yourself into appreciating or defending
this insanity. You’re allowed to hate it. Not all hate is improper. My
hatred of the fascistic impulses of archaic shari’a law stems not from
ignorance of “the other,” but from knowledge. The more I learn, the
more that is revealed, the stiffer my backbone becomes and the more I
come to despise. This hatred is fine, as its converse would be immoral
indifference. source: http://globalpolitician.com/articledes.asp?ID=3844&cid=11&sid=109
Islam is a political movement that aims to destroy all the governments
and democracies and establish its own rule. This is the main objective
of Islam and anyone denying this is lying. All the Muslims, including
the wishy-washy ones who like to call themselves "moderates" know that
the objective is to conquer the world and make Islam dominant… At the
same time Islam uses religion as a mask and demands religious status
and protection in the countries that it wants to conquer… Islam is a
subversive political movement, but you can’t fight it because it
portrays itself as religion and even solicits support from governments
that it aims to destroy. source: http://thinkers.net/forum/showthread.php?t=33
"There is no moderate Islam. There are Muslims who are passive, who
don't always follow the rules of Islam, but there's really only one
Islam, defined as submission to the will of God. There's nothing
moderate about it… How naive is the self-deception of the West to
continue to talk of moderate Islam?… The Western mind-set — that if we
respect them, they’re going to respect us, that if we indulge and
appease and condone and so on, the problem will go away — is
delusional. We're trying to appease Islam, but we are headed for a
terrible confrontation between fascist Islam and Right-wing fascists
who will step in when liberals fail to do so… This is the beginning of
a challenge with no possible compromise. There is no bargain that can
be struck when the question at hand is one of basic human rights." -
Ayaan Hirsi Ali (She lives in the USA and is the first refugee from
Western Europe since the Holocaust.)
"My criticsim of the West, especially of liberals, is that they take
freedom for granted." - Ayaan Hirsi Ali
"There is no such thing as “radical Islam”, since by its true
definition Islam is nothing but radical. Those who espouse a “liberal”
view of Islam should be forced to back up their nouveau interpretation
with unabrogated scriptural facts. Unless such would-be “reformists”
can categorically denounce Islamofascisim based on sound evidence from
the Qur’an, they prove to be the true radicals… The terrorists are
faithful and true to what is written in the holy Qur’an. A Muslim is
forbidden to think critically about the Qur'an. He must blindly obey
it and accept it passively and should memorize all of it… The terror
and death inflicted on humanity is not the work of radical Islam,
neither the political Islam, nor the militant Islam. It is Islam,
period… To be a moderate Muslim demands that a person explicitly
renounce much of the violent, exclusionary, and radical teachings of
the Quran. By so doing, the individual issues his own death warrant in
Islamic countries, is condemned as an apostate if he lives in a non-
Islamic land, and may even earn a fatwa on his head… The so-called
moderate Muslims, even if they exist, are complicit in the crimes of
the radicals either by providing them with funds, logistics, and new
recruits or simply by failing actively to confront and unequivocally
renounce them… Moderate Islam is a wedge that will jam open the door
to Jihad. The great majority of Muslims are not adherents of the
radical line. Yet, because the Islamists wage their war under the name
of Islam, they receive immense direct and indirect support from the
rank-and-file ordinary Muslims. It is this support of moderate Muslims
that keeps the Jihadists alive. And it is the Jihadists who intend to
show no mercy to any and all who do not share their theology, be they
Muslims or not… It is a mentality of enslavement that drives Islam…
Man subdues other men in order to establish a kingdom of oppression
and hatred on earth… Since its inception fourteen hundred years ago,
Islam has been at war with the people of this planet. Millions of
people have been literally butchered with the sword of Islam… Islam
lives, breaths and grows on blood. Once we take away this red element
from Islam, Islam will vanish completely." - Amil Imani
"There does not exist an identifiable body of Muslims, substantive in
number or an outright majority, who could be described as "moderate"
by their repudiation of Muslim extremists. Violence has been an
integral part of Muslim history, irrespective of whether it is
sanctioned by Islam, and Muslims who unhesitatingly use violence to
advance their political ambitions have created a climate within their
faith culture that any Muslim who questions such practice is then
deemed apostate and subject to harm. Consequently, what might pass for
"moderate" Muslims, the large number of Muslims unaccounted for as to
what they think, in practical terms constitute a forest within which
extremists are incubated, nurtured, given ideological and material
support, and to which they return for sanctuary." - Salim Mansur
"I studied the Quran a great deal. I came away from that study with
the conviction that by and large there have been few religions in the
world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. As far as I can see, it is
the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim
world." - Alexis de Tocqueville
"Christians believe that “love conquers all.” Well, love does not
conquer Islam." - Bill Warner
"Just as cancer cannot be reformed… Islam can't be reformed either and
it must be eradicated for the world to be saved." - Ali Sina
"It is ironic that many people use "Islamism" as a figleaf term to
avoid speaking about Islam itself; they pretend that the political and
imperialistic and supremacist elements of Islam are not deeply rooted
within it, but are merely "Islamist" inventions that can with relative
ease be eradicated and are already rejected by the Islamic
mainstream." - Robert Spencer
"Islam is more than a religion. It is an elaborate one-party state
punishable by death if you leave it… Many Muslim leaders tell the West
in English they are against violent jihad; but in private, in Arabic,
they praise the jihadists." - Noni Darwish
“The object of jihad is to bring the whole world under Islamic law… In
an Islamic state, there is in principle no law other than the shar’ia,
the Holy Law of Islam… The idea that any group of persons, any kind of
activities, or any part of human life is in any sense outside the
scope of religious law and jurisdiction is alien to Muslim thought.” -
Bernard Lewis
"When I was still a member of what is probably best termed the British
Jihadi Network, a series of semi-autonomous British Muslim terrorist
groups linked by a single ideology, I remember how we used to laugh in
celebration whenever people on TV proclaimed that the sole cause for
Islamic acts of terror like 9/11, the Madrid bombings and 7/7 was
Western foreign policy. By blaming the government for our actions,
those who pushed the 'Blair's bombs' line did our propaganda work for
us. More important, they also helped to draw away any critical
examination from the real engine of our violence: Islamic theology."
source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/jul/01/comment.religion1
"The golden age of equal rights was a myth, and belief in it was a
result, more than a cause, of Jewish sympathy for Islam. The myth was
invented by Jews in nineteenth-century Europe as a reproach to
Christians." - Bernard Lewis
“Of all known dictators the Sultans were the most dictatorial.” -
Stoyan Pribichevich (World Without End, published in 1938)
“The Geneva Conventions have become a sword used by terrorists to kill
civilians, rather than a shield to protect civilians from terrorists…
Terrorists who do not care about the laws of warfare, target innocent
non-combatants. Indeed, their goal is to maximize the number of deaths
and injuries among vulnerable civilians (for propaganda purposes). The
terrorist leaders - who do not wear military uniforms - deliberately
hide among non-combatants. They have also used ambulances, women
pretending to be sick or pregnant, and even children as carriers of
lethal explosives.” - Alan Dershowitz
"Islam contains specific notions of martyrdom and jihad that fully
explain the character of Muslim violence." - Sam Harris
"The Crusades were in every way a defensive war. They were a direct
response to Muslim aggression - an attempt to turn back or defend
against Muslim conquests of Christian lands." - historian Thomas
Madden
"The people who speak most sensibly about the threat that Islam poses
to Europe are actually fascists. To say that this does not bode well
for liberalism is an understatement: It does not bode well for the
future of civilization" - Sam Harris
"Apologizing to the Muslims for the Crusades is a complete betrayal to
the Crusaders who sacrificed their lives to stop Muslim invasion." -
Galadriel (anonymous evangelical Christian)
"Cringing before bullies is not the way to defend Western
civilization." - Jeff Jacoby
"Columbus dreamed of defeating the armies of Islam with the armies of
Europe made mighty by the wealth of the New World." - Reverend Rod
Parsley
"Support your brother, should he be oppressor or oppressed." (“Unsur
akhaka zaliman kana am mazluma”) - Arabic proverb
"In northern Italy, there are women that live chained at home, from
the kitchen to the bathroom, without being able to open the door" -
Souad Sbai (president of Association of Moroccan Women in Italy)
source: http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Religion/?id=1.0.1876380527
"The desire to instill a rational order into a violent world persuades
historians and political scientists to suppress the most obvious fact
about the modern era, namely that genocide is the norm, rather than
the exception… Wars do not end when they are won, but when those who
want to fight to the death find their wish has been granted." -
"Spengler"
"If a Muslim becomes a non-Muslim and if he propagates his/her new
religion then, it is as good as treason. There is a death penalty in
Islam for such a person. Punishment is death." - Zakir Naik
____________________________
simple.lan...@gmail.com
http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID=16027ED9-FFFE-4E3C-B9B6-30E0F0D980FC)
Islam does not enslave Muslims, only kafirs (non-Muslims). Since only
kafirs are enslaved, it assures that more of the world submits to
Islam.
Islamic slavery is based on the Trilogy of the Koran, the Sira
(Mohammed’s life) and the Hadith (the Traditions of Mohammed). All
three texts say that slavery is permitted, ethical, desirable and a
virtue. There is not one single negative word about slavery.
Slavery is seen as a process that brings kafirs to Islam. It is a
virtue to free slaves, but Mohammed only freed slaves who submitted to
Islam. If the kafir slave does not submit, then their children will.
So given enough time, slaves convert to Islam. That is one of the
reasons that Islam sees slavery as a positive…
Arabic has more words for slaves than any other language. Both a black
African and a black slave have the same name, abd. The historical
reason for this is that African slavery was so important to Islamic
economics. Language reflects history. Islamic legal history is filled
with the complaints by African Muslim jurists about how Arabic Muslim
slave traders captured African Muslims and sold them on the auction
block.
History records around 11,000,000 Africans being sent to the Americas
and about 13,000,000 being sent to Islamic countries for a total of
24,000,000 African slaves. To get one slave, many others have to be
killed for the tribe to surrender to enslavement. The old, sick and
children are left behind to starve. These collateral deaths are
conservatively estimated to about 5 to 1. So that implies that over
1400 years, 120,000,000 million Africans have been killed to furnish
Islam with its profits.
The accepted history of race in the U.S. is that white men captured
Africans, brought them to the U.S. and sold them as slaves. This is
wrong. When the white slavers showed up on the west coast of Africa,
they didn’t capture Africans. They looked them over in the pens, gave
the Muslim slave traders their money, took their bills of sale, and
loaded their purchases into their boats.
The Muslims had been plying the trade of war, capture, enslavement,
and sale for a thousand years. Mohammed was a slave trader. Long after
the white slave traders quit, the Muslims continued their African
slave trade. It still exists today.
And to put a fine point on it, many African slaves were castrated by
removing both testicles and penis. Castrated slaves brought more on
the slave block. Castrated blacks were the traditional keepers of
Mohammed's mosque in Medina.
African slaves were called abd; white slaves were called mamluk. Most
black slaves were used in mining and heavy fieldwork. White slaves
were used more for skilled trades. White slaves were even promoted to
leadership positions, if they converted. Only one black slave was
promoted to leadership. He ruled Egypt and was a eunuch.
Over a million white slaves were taken from Europe. Our word, slave,
comes from Slav. A white woman was the highest price slave for 1400
years on the Meccan auction block. The Muslim who could not afford a
white sex slave choose an Ethiopian woman at a third of the price.
The most revolting enslavement of whites was how Turkish Muslims took
as a tax, one out of five Christian children in Islamic ruled Eastern
Europe. These male children were taken back to Turkey where they
became the janissaries, elite soldiers for the sultan. The Turkish
sultans did not trust tribal Muslims to be the elite palace guards,
since they all harbored ancient tribal rivalries. We see the same
distrust of Muslim tribal politics in Afghanistan, where kafirs are
used as presidential guards.
The Hindus were enslaved, but we don't have the number. We do know
that jihad took half of ancient Hindustan and killed 80,000,000
Hindus. We have accountings of Hindus being enslaved by the hundreds
of thousands at a time.
Muslims enslave everyone, but no one enslaves Muslims. This knowledge
is part of Islam's arrogance and superiority. They know the history;
it is the dhimmis (kafir apologists) who are ignorant of the doctrine
and history of Islamic slavery…
The enslavement of Africans is happening today. The only reason that
Islam stopped enslaving whites and Hindus is that Islam is too weak to
resist the social pressure. The Sunna of slavery has not changed, just
the ability to use their law.
In the African countryside Muslims are still using jihad to enrich
themselves. I have spoken with a Sudanese slave who escaped. The
Muslims killed his parents and took him and his sister. Each night the
jihadists gang raped his sister. Remember, rape is Sunna.
When he met his new masters, they put him in the middle of a circle of
the family and each beat him with a stick. He was told that his new
name was Abd, black slave. He slept in the barn with the animals.
Our media and intellectuals are quick to punish the slightest insult
by a white against a black man, but they have not the slightest
recognition of murder, rape and enslavement of blacks by Islam. Our
media and intellectuals are dhimmis…
The criticism of whites because of their being involved in slavery is
standard fair in the media and the universities. Try to find a
university that even teaches about the killing of 120,000,000 Africans
for Muslims to profit from the 24,000,000 slaves…
One thing whites and blacks have in common is that their ancestors
were enslaved by Islam, and both are too ignorant to know it. Blacks
and whites have a secret shame buried under the denial of being slaves
inside Islam…
The ignorance of kafir intellectuals about Islam is profound. They
don't know about how jihad killed the 120,000,000 Africans, the
60,000,000 Christians, the 80,000,000 Hindus or the 10,000,000
Buddhists. Our intellectuals do not know about the Tears of Jihad
(detailed in all of our books). That is a lot of death and ignorance—
270,000,000 dead. Our intellectuals don't know, don't care and don't
bother. They deny.
University Islamic studies never mention the Islamic political
doctrine. The media discusses Islam in terms of political correctness,
and multiculturalism. History courses don’t teach about the
civilizational annihilation due to jihad. Religious leaders placate
imams in public gatherings and have no knowledge what the imam
actually thinks of them. Political thinkers do not even know Islam as
a political force…
Our intellectuals and the media have only one view of Islam — a
glorious civilization. They have created the "terrorist", a bogus term
based upon ignorance. And the "terrorist" is not even a "real" Muslim,
but an extremist fundamentalist. All of these terms are based upon a
profound ignorance of Islamic political doctrine.
Intellectuals cannot connect the dots of persecution of other
intellectuals and artists today, such as Salman Rushdie, Theo van
Gogh, the Mohammed cartoon riots, and Daniel Pearl. Their persecution
is part of a 1400 year Islamic tradition of keeping all intellectuals
and artists in line with the doctrine of political Islam. But for our
intellectuals, there is no history, no connection, no pattern, no
doctrine of Islam. Their only doctrine is the doctrine of denial.
These intellectuals write our textbooks. Then our tax dollars buy the
books to feed the ignorance…
Rape is not a sin. Rape is permitted and encouraged by Mohammed and
the Koran. Islam is the only political system in the world that
includes rules for rape and war. Rape is jihad. How good can it get? A
Muslim gets to rape a kafir girl and get heaven credits. All jihad is
a ticket to Paradise.
The most disgusting aspect of the Islamic rape of kafirs is not the
rapes, but the kafir response. Kafirs become dhimmis by ignoring the
rapes. I challenge you to find one, even one, mention of Islamic rape
in the history books…
Our so-called "feminist" scholars… are traitors to our culture and a
shame and a disgrace. They remain silent in the face of heinous crimes
against women.
____________________________
A new study suggests that a million or more European Christians were
enslaved by Muslims in North Africa between 1530 and 1780 – a far
greater number than had ever been estimated before. source:
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/whtslav.htm
____________________________
simple.lan...@gmail.com
Islam is a supremacist Bedouin ideology rather than a spiritual
religion. It forbids Muslim emigration to the lands of the infidels
because a Muslim minority cannot enslave the infidel majority. Despite
this prohibition Muslims emigrate to the West. They claim that they
are not migrants, but conquerors who live in sharia mini-states and
expand these mini-states by terrorizing infidel neighbors and driving
them out.
The process of migrating and establishing a Muslim community in a non-
Muslim context has an important place in Islamic theology. The word
hijra is used to describe such a migration… Muslims see the
establishment of a Muslim community in the UK as a contemporary hijra…
Some are even calling for Muslim-majority areas to become like an
Ottoman millet i.e. to organise their own social, cultural and
educational life in accordance with their religious beliefs. In parts
of France, says Taheri, a de facto millet system is already in place,
seen in Islamic head-dress, Islamic beards, Islamic control of the
administration, and the elimination of cinemas, dance-halls and shops
selling alcohol and pork… Islam is a territorial religion. Any space
once gained is considered sacred and should belong to the umma for
ever. Any lost space must be regained - even by force if necessary.
Migrant Muslim communities in the West are constantly engaged in
sacralising new areas, first the inner private spaces of their homes
and mosques, and latterly whole neighbourhoods (e.g. in Birmingham) by
means of marches and processions. So the ultimate end of sacred space
theology is autonomy for Muslims of the UK under Islamic law… Most
alarming of all is the prospect of Muslim secessionist violence in the
UK as in Kosovo, the Philippines, Thailand and elsewhere (Huntington’s
much-reviled “bloody borders of Islam”). Now this is happening –
apparently – in France… Islamic enclaves would be defined by Islamic
values, education, politics, religious practice, and above all law.
They would be “cleansed” of any non-Muslim presence. This cleansing is
already beginning by means of threats and violence to isolated
churches in Muslim-majority areas. source: http://jmm.aaa.net.au/articles/16649.htm
____________________________
simple.lan...@gmail.com
http://www.islam-watch.org/AnwarSheikh/JihadandCivilization1.htm
http://www.islam-watch.org/Others/Allah-and-Eurabia.htm with minor
edits)
The birthplace of Islam, Arabia was afflicted with a harsh environment
unsuitable for agriculture. Bedouins inhabited this harsh environment.
They were wandering in search of pastures and supplemented their
meager livelihood with brigandage, which meant raiding other tribes
and commercial caravans. Though it was sheer looting, it assured them
solace, security and survival, and, therefore, it was not looked down
upon as sinful but a source of power, pleasure and prestige. This
institution of brigandage known as ghazwa (razzia) had existed long
before the advent of prophet Muhammad, the greatest Arab national
hero. The Umayyad poet al-Qutami has alluded to this custom in his two
verses: "Our business is to make raids on the enemy, on our neighbor
and on our own brother, in case we find none to raid but a brother."
Brigandage was a compulsive trait of the Arab national character and
this is the reason that it was not considered an act of impiety but a
mark of honor and manliness.
The chief deity of pre-Islamic Mecca was the moon-god called Hubal or
al-ilah (god), which was shortened to Allah in pre-Islamic times.
Mohammed dropped the name Hubal but retained the generic Allah. Pre-
Islamic Arabs worshipped the moon-god by bowing in prayer toward Mecca
several times a day. They also made pilgrimages to Mecca, walked
around the Kaaba seven times and threw stones at the devil. And they
fasted for one month, which began with the appearance of the crescent
moon and ended when the crescent moon reappeared. These same rites
form the core of Islam today: Muslims bow in prayer toward Mecca, make
pilgrimages to Mecca, walk around the Kaaba seven times, and they
still throw stones at the devil. They also observe the fast of
Ramadan, which begins and ends with the crescent moon.
The word Islam is not derived from the word "Salam" which means peace,
but from the word "al-silm" which means submission or surrender. The
Kaaba is actually a meteorite which fascinated the ancient tribal
Arabs who were awe-struck by its flaming rush from the skies before it
landed in Mecca.
Mohammed (yimach shmo ve-zichro - may his name and memory be
obliterated) was a murderer, a pedophile and a scoundrel of the worst
kind. Epileptic fits created hallucinations that a god was talking to
him. His first converts were his wife Khadija, his slave Zaid, and
hardened criminals who wanted to loot a harried and defeated enemy.
Having lost his father, the posthumous orphan Mohammed wanted to
perpetuate his father's memory. His father's name Abdallah was derived
from Abd-Allah which translates as "Slave of Allah." This is the
reason why Mohammed chose Allah among the many pre-Islamic Arab
deities to be the only deity to be worshipped by the Muslims.
After normal marriage with Khadija, he started his spree of marriages
with his marriage of Aisha who was the daughter of his follower Abu
Bakr. Aisha was just seven years old when Mohammed married her and she
was only nine years old when he consumed this marriage! This is the
inspiration for the Arabs of today to pick up child brides.
Realizing the significance of brigandage, Mohammed called it jihad,
i.e., the holy war against the infidels. At his core, Mohammed was
nothing more than a power grabber, who slyly used religion to promote
himself. And the people of Mecca as well as those of Medina saw
through that. Some inhabitants of Medina supported him because he
advocated war against their competitors: the Jews and the Quraish
tribe of Mecca. Mohammed drilled into his followers the fantasy that
if they died in a jihad, they would reach heaven (Jann'at) where they
would be served by 72 virgins (Houris) and by pearly eyed boys for the
perverts among his followers.
Two communities lived in Medina (Yathrib): the pagan, polytheistic
Arabs and the Jews. They were often on the warpath. The Arabs were
more numerous, but the Jews by virtue of being traders were more
prosperous and better organized, they also had built fortresses within
and around Medina to defend themselves during their internecine fights
with the pre-Islamic Arab tribes around Yathrib (Medina). The Jews
were usually victorious in the battles against the Arabs. The Arabs of
Medina decided to outwit the Jews by becoming Mohammed's followers and
seek his help in defeating the Jews. This is why the Arabs of Medina
(Yathrib) welcomed Mohammed, in whom they saw an opportunity to break
the trade monopoly of the Jews and also to defeat their other rivals,
the Meccans.
Islam was conceived as a political ploy of Arabs living in Medina
against Jews and Mecca, and it was marketed by Mohammed to his first
converts in Medina as a political alliance rather than as a lofty
religion. Mohammed organized them to take his first revenge on the
Meccans, and he started regularly raiding the caravans of the Meccans
that passed by Medina. He organized 64 such raids from 622 to 630, of
which he personally led 27 raids. These raids were called Ghazawats or
Razzias. The Meccans finally got fed up with Mohammed's antics and
attacked him in Medina. This led to the first major battle in
Mohammed's life - the battle of Badr. The Meccan army was led by Abu
Jahal. In this battle, he realized that the far stronger Meccan army
could only be defeated by guile. He ordered all the water springs
outside Medina to be sanded-up, so that the attacking Meccans would be
without any water. This was a legitimate tactic in a war, but a true
messenger of god would not destroy water supply of his own clan. The
Meccans decided to outwit Mohammed and attack Medina during a
cloudburst, to obviate the need for water. But the heavily armored
Meccan army got trapped in the slushy sands outside Medina and they
were in disarray with camels falling over each other in total
disorder. They were defeated by the infantry charges of the Mohammed
's rag-tag, but highly motivated gang.
Many of Mohammed's followers pretended to leave Islam before they
settled in Mecca, thus becoming the fifth column during the eventual
invasion of Mecca that took place in 8 A.H. (630 C.E.). The Hudna
(temporary peace treaty) with the Meccans demonstrates the evil genius
of Mohammed. This evil genius is shared by all Muslims who trick non-
Muslims in day-to-day life in a practice popularly known among the
Muslims as Taquiyya (also spelt as Taqiyya or Taqiya) which means
deception. Pervez Musharraf (the President of Pakistan) referred to
the Hudna when he announced after 9/11 that he was making a pact with
America to fight the Taliban.
With every Muslim military victory, there was not just a change of
ruler, but a wholesale slaughter of those who refused to convert or
pay Jaziya. There was also a total destruction of the pre-Islamic
culture, its educational institutions, libraries, etc.
One of the cardinal principles of Islam is that when a Muslim commits
heinous deeds in order to bring victory to Muslims waging a Jihad
against the Non-Muslims (Kafirs), Islamic law forgives those deeds.
Mohammed preached contempt for all the non-Muslims and told his
gangsters that the non-Muslims were living in ignorance (Jahiliyaa)
and that he would lead his followers to enlightenment (Ailm or ilm).
This enlightenment forgave all acts of rape, murder, torture, as long
as they were committed against the non-Muslims (Kafirs).
Muslims respect only strength and cruelty. They treat magnanimity,
charity and noblesse with contempt. The ritual of emulating Mohammed
in everything is called the Sunnat (or Sunnah). Muslim males emulate
him in doing everything he did like drinking camel urine, dyeing hair
red by using henna, in addition to emulating Mohammed's traits of
being murderous, lecherous, and deceptive.
Arabs brainwashed, Arabized and Islamized all the conquered people at
the pain of death. Knowing all this is relevant today for those who
attempt to eradicate Islam. To do so we have to first understand the
depth of depravity in Islam. Islam has brutalized them and transformed
them into robotic followers, killers, and sadists. If the Muslims are
to be saved from Islam, then it is not sufficient to conquer the
Muslim countries and to encourage democratic forms of government. If
we want Muslims to become emancipated, civilized beings, we have to de-
Islamize them as thoroughly as we have de-Nazified Germans.
Muslims have devised ingenious methods to reach those best suited for
Islam, so they evangelize in prisons, where they appeal to the dregs
of society, or those who come from broken families, or those who have
had some heart-breaking personal experience. Muslim missionaries prey
on them like vultures and hyenas. Richard Reid (the shoe bomber), and
Jose Padilla are typical Westerners who became Muslims. During the
fourteen centuries of Islam's existence, death threats forced people
to become Muslims and kept them Muslim. The same death threats are
used today to intimate Ayan Hirsi Ali, Salman Rushdie and many others
who tell us the truth about Islam. According to the Shariah, a Murtad
(Muslim apostate) has to be killed, and it is the duty of all Muslims
to kill any Muslim who leaves Islam.
While all forms of religious fanaticism are deplorable, only Islam
sanctifies the slaughter of all Kafirs (non-Muslims). It teaches
Muslims to gloat over the killing of non-Muslims, including women and
children. Islam is a psychology of perpetual war. A psychology that
had existed among the pre-Islamic Bedouin Arabs. But then, before
Islam, this psychology was not a global problem, since the Arabs
fought amongst themselves.
The full understanding of the heinous nature of Islam is the first,
and most important step in our efforts to eradicate Islam. Islam lives
by the sword and shall die by the sword. Death threats forced people
into becoming Muslims and kept them as Muslims. Death threats are the
only way these scum can be shaken out of their adherence to the
savagery called Islam. Those opposed to Islam will have to be like the
hunter who aims his rifle between the eyes of the man-eating tiger and
shoots till the tiger is dead meat. The hunter bears no enmity toward
the tiger, but he has to kill the tiger if he does not intend to
become tiger's dinner.
____________________________
simple.lan...@gmail.com
It is impossible to appeal to a sense of reason in societies bound by
fanaticism because enlightenment directly challenges and threatens
their beliefs and very existence… The fanaticism inherent in Islam
produces a group allegiance that supersedes all other potential
attachments. The tribal code and tribal cohesion takes precedence over
anything else and a collective fanaticism fosters cultural
protectionism… The principle of honor is of primary importance in
radical Islamic cultures. The honor of the community must be protected
at all costs and far exceeds any notion of the individual or of
individual rights. Religious leaders, who view the world across a long-
term time horizon, operate for the good of the ummah, the propagation
of Islam over time and the enforcement of Islamic law. Tribal success
hinges on the inculcation of a uniform system of steadfast shared
values and of a sense of shame so deep and visceral that it is
impervious to reason and makes death preferable to tribal code
violations and the accompanying loss of collective honor. It
solidifies a rigidly imposed “us vs. them” mindset in which “the
other” is a cursed object of abject enmity. The faithful are
indoctrinated and prepared to sacrifice themselves for furthering
fanatic tribal goals. Martyrs for the cause are celebrated and
elevated to a position of honor… Their fanaticism, which includes
glorification of martyrdom, thus becomes a weapon that defeats all
Western attempts to deal with tribal societies, including negotiation,
conventional warfare and punitive economic measures. So, while Islam
seeks to destroy the West’s enlightened way of life with the
fanaticism of jihad, the West sabotages itself by non-judgmentally
viewing these actions as cultural variations or efforts to procure
freedom from an imagined oppression. source:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=E88A9A17-E3E2-447A-B286-108E99EF27E6
Name any area of achievement, any field of human endeavour — patents
filed, literacy, quality of life, degree of civil or political
freedoms, transparency, world-class universities, and so on. In every
case, the nations of Islam are at or near the bottom in every
category, and only barely beat sub-Saharan Africa in overall
performance. source: http://www.islam-watch.org/Others/Why-Muslims-doomed-to-fail.htm
Muslims constitute 22 percent of world population with a 1 percent
share of Nobel Prizes. Jews constitute 0.23 percent of world
population with a 22 percent share of Nobel Prizes. source:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/sina51126.htm
"Islam is founded upon the words of Allah (the Koran) and the Sunna
(the words and actions of Mohammed found in the Sira and the Hadith).
The words of Allah are only about 17% of the total doctrinal texts.
The words and actions of Mohammed comprise 83% of the doctrine of
Islam. The Sunna is the perfect example of Mohammed's words and deeds.
The necessity for the Sunna is found in over 40 verses in the Koran
that say that those who do not follow the pattern of Mohammed will go
to Hell and the more than 30 verses that command Muslims to follow the
example of Mohammed. The Sunna of Mohammed is found in the Sira
(Mohammed's official biography) and the Hadith (the Traditions of
Mohammed). The Sira is found in the texts by Ibn Ishaq, Al Tabari, and
Ibn Sa'd. Ishaq's text is the most authoritative. The Hadith are
collections of what Mohammed did and said upon specific events. There
are six major collections that are used by Sunnis. Of these Bukhari is
the most authoritative." - Bill Warner, source:
http://docstalk.blogspot.com/2008/08/doctrine-of-islamic-deceit.html
At least 75% of the Sira (life of Mohammed) is about jihad. About 67%
of the Koran written in Mecca is about the unbelievers, or politics.
Of the Koran of Medina, 51% is devoted to the unbelievers. About 20%
of Bukhari’s Hadith is about jihad and politics. Religion is the
smallest part of Islamic foundational texts. source:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1701
Political Islam’s most famous duality is the division of the world
into believers, dar al Islam, and unbelievers, dar al harb… The
unbeliever can be treated nicely, in the same way a farmer treats his
cattle well… Mohammed preached his religion for 13 years and garnered
only 150 followers. But when he turned to politics and war, in 10
years time he became the first ruler of Arabia by averaging an event
of violence every 7 weeks for 9 years. His success did not come as a
religious leader, but as a political leader… The history of political
Islam is the destruction of Christianity in the Middle East, Egypt,
Turkey and North Africa. Half of Christianity was lost. Before Islam,
North Africa was the southern part of Europe (part of the Roman
Empire). Around 60 million Christians were slaughtered during the
jihadic conquest. Half of the glorious Hindu civilization was
annihilated and 80 million Hindus killed. The first Western Buddhists
were the Greeks descended from Alexander the Great’s army in what is
now Afghanistan. Jihad destroyed all of Buddhism along the silk route.
About 10 million Buddhists died. The conquest of Buddhism is the
practical result of pacifism. Zoarasterianism was eliminated from
Persia. The Jews became permanent dhimmis throughout Islam. In Africa
over 120 million Christians and animists have died over the last 1400
years of jihad. Approximately 270 million nonbelievers died over the
last 1400 years for the glory of political Islam. These are the Tears
of Jihad which are not taught in any school. source:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID={6AA49466-2575-491F-B712-CEA90FCCCD0D}
"Like children playing with dynamite, Western intellectuals,
journalists, and diplomats fantasize that they are achieving results
in the Middle East with their words, promises, apologies, money, and
concessions. Yet how can such innocents cope… with polities and
societies whose basic ruling ethos is that of the serial killer?… Can
anyone really expect a stable society capable of progress in Pakistan
when a large majority of the population expresses admiration for Usama
bin Ladin? And what about the Saudi system where, as one local writer
put it, the big Usama put into practice what the little Usama learned
in a Saudi school?… The radical forces in the region are not expecting
to retain or gain power by negotiating, compromising, or being better
understood. They believe they are going to shoot their way into power
or, just as good, accept the surrender of those they have intimidated.
That is why so much of the Western analysis and strategies for dealing
with the region are a bad joke." - Barry Rubin, source:
http://globalpolitician.com/articledes.asp?ID=3952&cid=6&sid=20
Turkish holocaust of Christian Armenians inspired Adolf Hitler:
http://tinyurl.com/3yjvae
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide#Influence_of_the_Armenian_Genocide_on_Adolf_Hitler
Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf was inspired by the Koran:
http://www.prophetofdoom.net/Mein_Kampf.Islam
Young Talib beheads Ghulam Nabi: http://tinyurl.com/2rb2e3
Beheading video of American civil engineer Eugene Armstrong:
http://www.abrahamic-faith.com/audio/eugene-armstrong-beheading-video.wmv
Beheading video of American engineer Jack Hensley:
http://www.notobs.com/english/audioandvideo/crimes/jack_hensle.htm
Beheading video of Japanese tourist Shosei Koda:
http://www.notobs.com/english/audioandvideo/crimes/shosei_koda.htm
Beheading video of American businessman Nicholas Berg:
http://www.notobs.com/english/audioandvideo/crimes/nick_burg.htm
Beheading video of British civil engineer Kenneth John Bigley:
http://www.notobs.com/english/audioandvideo/crimes/kenneth_bigley.htm
Beheading video of South Korean translator Kim Sun-il:
http://www.notobs.com/english/audioandvideo/crimes/kim_sun_execution.htm
Muslim Albanians exterminate Christian Serbs in Kosovo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaqThra0kCI
Brief History Of Ethnic Cleansing Of Serbs In Kosovo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ajTcAIlTPY
Muslim families are baby-production factories. No consideration is
given about the child's future… and whether the parents can feed,
shelter and educate him/her. What is important is the mullah's call to
grow in numbers, so that the Ummah may overcome the kaffirs. source:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1259
The Muslim world does not accept non-Muslim immigrants. In fact, it is
becoming more homogenous as Islamic regimes drive out religious
minorities or whittle them down through other means of attrition. Even
Muslims who feel entitled to life in the West often decry the presence
of foreigners in Muslim lands. source: http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/homeland.php?id=1072859
"What I dislike about it is this element of parasitism. These (Muslim)
people who want to come to other countries from their own benighted
places. They twist the laws, they hire lawyers, they do bad things to
get residence. And then, having got that, they wish to destroy (the
society) which has welcomed them." - Nobel Prizewinning author Sir
Vidia Naipaul
Everything a Muslim does is done to promote Islam. Everything they see
and touch which is not Islamic, or accepted by Islam, becomes a target
for “jihad”. So no matter how many concessions we make, Westerners can
never concede enough. Yet Muslims are moving us, step by step, towards
conceding the unthinkable: that there is only one God and his name is
Allah and that politics, religion, education and every other form of
human life must bow down to and accept the “guidance” of Islam. There
can be no shared ground with Islam. Muslims, by their very nature, are
committed to transforming every area they live and work in into an
Islam-dominated world. And freedom for Islam is doom for anything and
anyone else. Saying “I will live in peace, equality and tolerance with
Islam” is… the medical equivalent to saying you will live in equality
and harmony with a body-wasting disease… Anyone with a mind knows that
“jihad” means the Islamization of everyday life. And any Muslim who
accepts secularism, freedom, equality or any of our other cherished
“Western” values can no longer be considered a Muslim in anything but
name - for the Qur’an forbids it. The dominance and authority of the
Qur’an is why Muslim communities, no matter where they are have never
integrated. They are either dominant or growing… Building a mosque in
a European city is Islamization. Changing school meals to halal is
Islamization. A teacher telling my child that Allah and God are the
same thing is Islamization. Destroying traditional European culture
because it may offend the people who would like to destroy it is
Islamization. Allowing irresponsibly fecund families into Europe to
breed, take our jobs and bleed our welfare system dry is Islamization…
“Islamization” is the mass immigration of people who hold “Western”
values in contempt. “Islamization” is the invitation of people who
detest our freedoms, religions, equalities and ways of life into our
neighbourhoods, cities and schools. And “Islamization” is the
reprehensible enforcement of multiculturalism even though the result
is inevitable social tension, alienation and hatred. Westerners and
Islamic culture are bipolar opposites which never have – and never
will – share common values. source:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1355
I was born and raised as a Muslim… I left Islam when I understood that
Islam is a sick and evil religion… You will find us well mannered,
polite… but we will stab you in your back when you are sleeping as we
did on 911. There will be more 9/11s in Europe and in America. We will
say, "We do not support terrorism but America got what it deserved."
The war of civilizations has just begun… American laws will protect
us. Democrats and Leftist will support us. UNO will legitimize us.
CAIR will incubate us. ACLU will empower us. Western Universities will
educate us. Mosques will shelter us. OPEC will finance us. Hollywood
will love us… We will use your welfare system… We will take the
advantage of American kindness, gullibility, and compassion… We will
say one thing on the camera and teach another thing to our children at
home… Our boys will marry Caucasian girls in Europe and in America. We
will mix with the intricate fabric of the Western society but still
will remember to do Jihad when time comes. Who are we? We are the
sleeper cells. We will raise our children to be loyal to Islam and
Mohammad only. Everything else is secondary… You infidels cannot
defeat us. We are 1.2 billion strong. We will double again. Do you
have enough bullets to kill us? source (minor edits):
http://waronjihad.org/muslim170605.html
I headed for Gracanica, a small enclave of Christian Serbs who's
ancestors have been living in Kosovo for thousands of years. Gracanica
Monastery has been the site of Christian churches since the 6th
century, yet when I arrived I was struck by the towering concrete
walls adorned with coiled barbed wire and machine gun nests, all
required now for the protection of the nuns and bishops who live
there. The outside was also spotted with vehicle blockers reminiscent
of Normandy Beach, with KFOR guards and vehicles patrolling to protect
the Christians from Islamist attacks. I visited with the nuns in the
monastery, who told me their stories, how much they lived in fear of
being murdered by radical Muslims. My heart sank as I saw that even
though their families had been there for countless years, they knew
that their situation would never get better, and that sometime in
their lives they would either be murdered or forced to leave. My mind
shot back to Dearborn, Michigan, and I found myself wondering if
Christians there would one day be forced to live like this. source:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID=9A68C6F6-8A08-453E-B2E8-6E247D2736CD
Why did Bosnia collapse into the worst slaughter in Europe since World
War Two? In the thirty years before the meltdown, Bosnian Serbs had
declined from 43 percent to 31 percent of the population, while
Bosnian Muslims had increased from 26 percent to 44 percent. In a
democratic age, you can’t buck demography—except through civil war.
The Serbs figured that out — as other Continentals will in the years
ahead: if you can’t outbreed the enemy, cull ’em. The problem that
Europe faces is that Bosnia’s demographic profile is now the model for
the entire continent. source: http://www.city-journal.org/html/17_1_urbanities-steyn.html
Muslim minorities throughout the world are being financed and
ideologically trained in Saudi and UAE funded mosques and Islamic
centers. These minorities act in strikingly similar manners in the
countries where they are situated throughout the world. On the one
hand, their local political leaders demand extraordinary communal
rights, rights accorded neither to the national majority nor to other
minority populations. On the other hand, Muslim neighborhoods,
particularly in Europe, but also in Israel, the Philippines and
Australia, are rendered increasingly ungovernable as arms of the state
like the police and tax authorities come under attack when they
attempt to assert state power in these Muslim communities. source:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1192380800225&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter
In Moslem culture, during the Daheyah (Sacrifice) feast, Moslems bring
a lamb into the home for a ritual slaughter accompanied by the
invocation 'Allahu Akbar', in the presence of the family and the
children. Now we see the Daheyah of Radical Islam to be Jews such as
Nick Berg and Daniel Pearl, who were beheaded with no mercy,
accompanied by the same pious invocation. This is a perversion of
Islam, but don't expect an apology. To expect Arab and Moslem
leadership to apologize for the barbaric murder of Nick Berg is a
reflection of the West's naive and wrong expectations of Arab culture.
In the Arab world to take responsibility and say sorry is taken as an
unmanly sign of weakness that may get a person into more trouble.
Those who admit guilt, even if it is accidental, are given no mercy
and may end up taking all the blame and being brutally punished. It is
the norm for Arabs to deny a fact (however blatant) and blame others
rather than admit to the wrongdoing and apologize. Honesty is not
rewarded. source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID=2AF97628-5F3E-447D-9098-396FFD757E4E
The mythical Moderate Islam is nowhere to be found… After each terror
attack, moderate Islam seems more of a dream while the reality of
Jihad expands around the globe… While Muslims have been moderate under
European colonial rule, the Islamic Revival has brought a return of
the original Islam. Given its origin, Islam has severe problems that
preclude it from being a suitable candidate for modernization and as a
basis for a sustained liberal order. Consequently, Islam will continue
to be a threat to civilization as long as it exists… The key to
understanding Islam is to realize that it is a supremacist ideology.
This explains why, for jihadist Muslims, the atrocity of 9/11 was a
religious experience that reaffirmed Allah’s will that Islam is
destined to rule this world… source:
http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/2005_12_01_libertyandculture_archive.html
Progressive radicalization is a persistent theme in Islam, not just in
the West, but in other parts of the world as well, where
fundamentalism usually has a way of winning out over pragmatism.
source: http://www.topix.net/forum/religion/hindu/TVJL7MSEGIK5D2GM9
"Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not
disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of
(other) countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country
in the world." - Ayatollah Khomeini
“We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another
name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this
land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of
the world.” - Ayatollah Khomeini
"Allah did not create man so that he could have fun. The aim of
creation was for mankind to be put to the test through hardship and
prayer. An Islamic regime must be serious in every field. There are no
jokes in Islam. There is no humor in Islam. There is no fun in Islam.
There can be no fun and joy in whatever is serious." - Ayatollah
Khomeini
"Those who oppose the mullahs oppose Islam itself; eliminate the
mullahs and Islam shall disappear in fifty years. It is only the
mullahs who can bring the people into the streets and make them die
for Islam - begging to have their blood shed for Islam." - Ayatollah
Khomeini
"I have nothing against Islam because it educates the men in this
division for me and promises them heaven if they fight and are killed
in action. A very practical and attractive religion for soldiers." -
Heinrich Himmler (head of Nazi SS troops)
"Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad will remain as long there is
Islam." - Sheik Saleh Al-Fawzan (member of the Senior Council of
Clerics, Saudi Arabia's highest religious body)
"The real intentions of Euroislam must be concealed from the general
public." - Tariq Ramadan
"Islam's borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental
problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a
different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority
of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their
power." - Samuel P. Huntington
"We're the ones who will change you… Just look at the development
within Europe, where the number of Muslims is expanding like
mosquitoes. Every western woman in the EU is producing an average of
1.4 children. Every Muslim woman in the same countries is producing
3.5 children." - Najmuddin Faraj Ahmad (a.k.a Mullah Krekar)
"Muslims breed like rats… They stay in our own countries, in our
cities, our universities, our business companies… Europe is no longer
Europe, it is Eurabia, a colony of Islam, where the Islamic invasion
does not proceed only in a physical sense, but also in a mental and
cultural sense." - Oriana Fallaci
"Eurabia's contemporary anti-Zionism and anti-Americanism are the
spiritual heirs of 1930s Nazism and anti-Semitism, triumphally
resurgent." - Bat Ye'or
"European universities - like those in America - are totally
controlled by the Arab-Islamic lobby, as are the schools. A teacher
who attempts to teach according to the European view of history is
thrown out. Indeed, the freedom of expression and thought that has
been so crucial for European democracy has disappeared." - Bat Ye'or
"On the political front, Europe has tied its destiny to the Arab
countries, and thus become involved in the logic of jihad against
Israel and the United States. How could Europe denounce the culture of
jihadic venom which exudes from its allies, while for so many years it
did everything to activate the jihad by hiding and justifying it by
claiming that the real danger comes not from the jihadists,
themselves, but from those who resist the Arab jihadist, the very
allies that Europe serves at every international gathering, and in the
European media. On the cultural front, there has been a complete re-
writing of history, which was first undertaken during the 1970s in
European universities. This process was ratified by the parliamentary
assembly of the Council of Europe in September 1991, at its meeting
devoted to “The Contribution of the Islamic civilization to European
culture…” The dhimmitude of Europe began with the subversion of its
culture and its values, with the destruction of its history and its
replacement by an Islamic vision of that history, supported by the
romantic myth of Andalusia. Eurabia adopted the Islamic conception of
history, in which Islam is defined as a liberating force, a force for
peace, and the jihad is regarded a ‘just war’. Those who resist the
jihad, like the Israelis and the Americans, are the guilty ones,
rather than those who wage it. It is this policy that has inculcated
in us, the Europeans, the spirit of dhimmitude that blinds us, that
instills in us a hatred for our own values, and the wish to destroy
our own origins and our own history… The spirit of dhimmitude is not
merely that of submission without fighting, not even a surrender. It
is also the denial of one’s own humiliation through this process of
integrating values that lead to our own destruction; it is the
ideological mercenaries offering themselves up for service in the
jihad; it is the traditional tribute paid by their own hand, and with
humiliation, by the European dhimmis, in order to obtain a false
security; it is the betrayal of one’s own people. The non-Muslim
protected dhimmi under Islamic rule could obtain an ephemeral and
delusive security through services rendered to the Muslim oppressor,
and through servility and flattery. And that is precisely the
situation in Europe today… The dhimmis are inferior beings who undergo
humiliations and aggressions in silence. Their aggressors, meanwhile,
enjoy an impunity that only increases their hatred and their feeling
of superiority, guaranteed by the protection of the law. The culture
of dhimmitude which is expanding throughout Europe is that of hate, of
crimes against non-Muslims that go unpunished, a culture which is
imported from the Arab countries along with “Palestinianism,” the new
European subculture that has been raised to the level of a European
Union cult, and its exalted war banner against Israel." - Bat Ye'or,
source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID={B1744004-DA73-47F7-88D4-2C63CD2A101B}
"I do not see serious signs of a Europeanization of Islam anywhere, a
move that would be expressed in a relativization of religion, a self-
critical view of the history of Islamic imperialism… we are light
years away from such a development… On the contrary, I think that we
are participating in the Islamization of Europe, reflected both in
daily occurrences and in our way of thinking… All the racist
fanaticism that permeates the Arab countries and Iran has been
manifested in Europe in recent years." - Charles Emmanuel Dufourcq
"The two greatest genocides of the 20th century are the crimes of
annihilating the Armenians and the Holocaust. Despite this, not a
single Arab or Islamic country acknowledges this or denounces the
Turks." - Magdi Khalil (Egyptian/American writer)
"All of Western logic is based upon the law of contradiction — if two
things contradict, then at least one of them is false. But Islamic
logic is dualistic; two things can contradict each other and both are
true." - Bill Warner
"Islam considers itself the three branches of government… Freedom of
the press is completely alien to Islam, since a free press tends to
express matters as it sees it, rather than as it is stated in the
Quran. To Islam, the Quran is the press and the only press. There is
no need for critical reporting, no need to present ideas that may
conflict with the Quran, and no place for criticism of anything
Islamic. The stranglehold of Islam on the individual and society is
complete." - Amil Imani
"By tolerating hatred and violence, the West is not doing Muslims or
Islam a favor. Tolerating intolerance is not a sign of compassion; it
is gross negligence." - Nonie Darwish
"We must be open and generous towards Muslims and Islam, so that when
we become the minority, they will be the same towards us." - Jens
Orback (Swedish Minister of Immigration)
"The war against the infidel world is a perpetual war. Islam divides
the entire world/humanity into two—the world of Islam (Dar al-Islam)
and the world of warfare (Dar al-Harb). These two worlds are in
permanent confrontation, until Islam replaces the current civilization
with its own version, the Islamic Caliphate." - Abul Kasem
"Human blood is the life-line of Islam, violence its hallmark, and
hate its foundation. In the beginning, Islam lives on the blood of
infidels. When that is unavailable, or becomes difficult, Islam must
cannibalize itself." - Abul Kasem
"There is no doubt that both the Qur'an and the Prophet (saws)
absolutely forbid Muslims to take the kuffar as their awliya (masters
and protectors)." - Zafar Bangash (source: http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/52814)
Tony Blair’s [UK] government passed a law that would essentially
criminalize blaspheming Islam… Norway and Sweden have already begun
the process of implementing similar laws. In parts of Australia
criticizing Islam can get you jail time. In Israel a woman was
sentenced to prison for drawing and distributing a cartoon of Mohamed
as a pig. In Russia and Belarus newspaper editors have faced jail time
for reprinting the Danish cartoons… There are Islamic laws that place
restrictions on women. These won’t require government authority to
legislate. Muslims simply implement them by making clear what happens
to women who don’t. In parts of the world that has meant throwing acid
into the faces of schoolgirls who don’t wear the Hijab as in
Indonesia, preventing women from entering public areas if they are not
dressed ‘modestly’ as is widespread in African countries where Islam
is on the rise, treating any woman not dressed in the Islamic manner
as a legitimate rape target as in Europe… The only major step Muslims
have yet to achieve is to force disputes between Muslims and Non-
Muslims to be mediated in Muslim courts. This will begin as part of
workplace sensitivity regulations for Muslims requiring disputes with
the company to be arbitrated in a Muslim forum and some disputes
between civil authorities and Muslim workers as well… CAIR and similar
groups will run puff pieces on how these arbitration mechanisms
function much more peacefully than civil courts and save everyone
money… There will be Muslim unions that will strike not over job
issues but over political ones. Support for Israel or sanctions
against Iran or any opposition to a Muslim demand by a city will mean
striking transit workers, taxi strikes and work stoppages that will
derail local, state and national economies. It will be cheaper and
simpler for most to simply give in. source: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/1776
Hassan al Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood (from which
today’s radical Muslim groups descend) was, after all, an open admirer
and supporter of Adolf Hitler -- as was the principal theorist of the
modern jihad, Sayyid Qutb. During World War II, the Grand Mufti of
Jerusalem, cousin of Yasir Arafat and spiritual godfather of
Palestinian nationalism, Hajj Amin al-Husseini, pronounced his pro-
Nazi sympathies openly and proudly. In May 1941, he issued a fatwa
calling upon the Germans to bomb Tel Aviv, and in November 1941
traveled to Berlin and met with Hitler. He implored the Nazi dictator
to help implement a Final Solution in the Middle East. Then he went to
the Balkans, where he spearheaded the creation of Muslim units of the
Waffen SS. source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=FDD13E54-41C7-4C89-A482-58159E9435A5
More than 8.000 ex-officers of SS ran to Arabic countries and were
received there like "brothers in arms". source:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1884
Sun Tzu teaches that to win a war one must know who the enemy is. And
if there is a single reason while we’ve failed, it is the
administration’s’ staggering inability after six years to figure out
who our enemy is, let alone how to go about defeating it. Officially,
we’re fighting a war against terror, but terrorism is a tactic not an
enemy and one does not win wars by fighting tactics. Yet, the enemy is
very real and formidable. Armed with a murderous ideology, it has a
worldwide support and recruitment infrastructure, virtually unlimited
financing and single-minded commitment to the destruction of our
civilization… Saudi Arabia, a reactionary medieval fiefdom subsisting
on our oil rents, has spent, by its own admission, anywhere between
$80 and $100 billion dollars over the past 30 years exporting its
hateful Wahhabi creed worldwide and building a gigantic infrastructure
of Islamism. There is not a city of any size anywhere in the West
today that does not have a Saudi-controlled mosque, Islamic center or
a madrassa, all preaching hatred and violence against the infidels. In
the United States, at least half of the mosques are owned by the
radical Wahhabi organization North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) and
most of what claims to be the Muslim establishment is in the hands of
radical Islamists. http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/terrorism.php?id=1315637
What on earth has American foreign policy got to do with the stoning
to death of a woman for adultery in Nigeria? It has every thing to do
with Islam, and Islamic Law… We must take seriously what the Islamists
say to understand their motivations, to understand September 11, 2001.
The four greatest influences on the modern rise of Militant Islam have
been the Egyptians Hasan al Banna, the founder of Muslim Brethren, and
Sayyid Qutb, the Indo-Pakistani, Maududi, and the Iranian Ayatollah
Khomeini. They all repeat the same message, derived from classical
writers like Ibn Taymiyyah, and ultimately from the Koran and Hadith,
namely, it is the divinely ordained duty of all Muslims to fight non-
Muslims in the literal, military sense until man-made law has been
replaced by God’s Law, the Sharia, and Islam has conquered the entire
world… In August, 2002, the Rand Corporation published a report that
described Saudi Arabia as "the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the
most dangerous opponent." The report went on explain that "Saudi
Arabia supports our enemies and attacks our allies. The Saudis are
active at every level of the terror chain, from planners to
financiers, from cadre to foot-soldier, from ideologist to
cheerleader." And yet little seems to have changed in the West's
behaviour towards a regime that has financed terrorism, funneled
millions into madrassas that preach more anti-Western hatred, has
corrupted institutions of higher education like Harvard and Georgetown
University, has bought the favours of Western politicians and seeks to
destroy Western civilisation at every turn. We know the reason: oil.
But until we address the question of Saudi Arabia and its influence on
life in the West we shall have no progress, no rest… Demand the re-
writing of Saudi, Egyptian, and Syrian textbooks preaching hatred of
the West, of Jews, of Non-Muslims… French teachers, in recent years,
have been intimidated by Muslim pupils into not teaching the
Holocaust… There is, among many well-meaning Western intellectuals,
academics, and Islamologists, the belief that somehow Islam will
reform itself without anyone anywhere ruffling any feathers,
disturbing Muslim sensibilities, or saying anything at all about the
Koran. This is wishful thinking. If one desires to bring about an
Enlightenment in the Islamic world or among Muslims living in the
West, at some stage, someone somewhere will have to apply to the Koran
the same techniques of textual analysis as were applied to the Bible
by Spinoza and others, especially in Germany during the 19th Century.
In recent years, Saudi Arabia, and other Islamic countries (for
example, Brunei) have established Chairs of Islamic Studies in
prestigious Western Universities, which are encouraged to present a
favourable image of Islam. Scientific research, leading to objective
truth, no longer seems to be the goal. Critical examination of the
sources or the Koran is discouraged. Scholars, such as Daniel
Easterman, have even lost their posts for not teaching about Islam in
the way approved by Saudi Arabia. In December, 2005, Georgetown and
Harvard Universities accepted $20 million each from Saudi Prince
Alwaleed bin Talal for programmes in Islamic Studies. Such money can
only corrupt the original intent of all higher institutions of
education, that is, the search for truth. Now, we shall only have
"Islamic truth" that is acceptable to the Royal Saudi family, a family
that has financed terrorism, anti-Westernism and anti-Semitism for
over thirty years. Previous donations from various Saudi sources have
included gifts of $20 million, $5 million, and $2 million dollars to
the University of Arkansas, the University of California, Berkeley;
and Harvard respectively. source: http://www.islam-watch.org/IbnWarraq/Islamic-Enlightenment.htm
“Among religions, Bolshevism is to be reckoned with Mohammedanism
rather than with Christianity and Buddhism. Christianity and Buddhism
are primarily personal religions, with mystical doctrines and a love
of contemplation. Mohammedanism and Bolshevism are practical, social,
unspiritual, concerned to win the empire of this world. - Bertrand
Russell (source: Theory and Practice of Bolshevism, London, 1921 pp .
5, 29, 114)
Sir Jadunath Sarkar, the pre-eminent historian of Mughal India, wrote
this about dhimmitude, the humiliating apartheid system imposed upon
non-Muslims under Islamic rule: "The conversion of the entire
population to Islam and the extinction of every form of dissent is the
ideal of the Muslim State. If any infidel is suffered to exist in the
community, it is as a necessary evil, and for a transitional period
only. (…) A non-Muslim therefore cannot be a citizen of the State; he
is a member of a depressed class; his status is a modified form of
slavery. He lives under a contract (dhimma) with the State. (…) In
short, his continued existence in the State after the conquest of his
country by the Muslims is conditional upon his person and property
made subservient to the cause of Islam." This "modified form of
slavery" is now frequently referred to as the pinnacle of "tolerance."
If the semi-slaves rebel against this system and desire equal rights
and self-determination, Jihad resumes. This happened with the
Christian subjects of the Ottoman Empire, who were repressed with
massacres, culminating in the genocide by Turkish and Kurdish Muslims
against Armenians in the 20th century. This same pattern is now used
against the state of Israel. Israelis are not only attacked because
they are Jews, but because they do not meekly disarm and accept the
status of servitude that they should have according to Islamic law.
They are disobedient dhimmis, just as the Armenians were. source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/Fjordman/Why-We-Should-Oppose-an-Independent-Kosovo.htm
Muslims still enslave non-muslims:
http://www.cjnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13411&Itemid=101
http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=12207
For the most part, Christianity has been purged from the Middle East.
While some countries have a small minority of Christians, they are
persecuted and tormented and in many cases, they are not even allowed
to be citizens of the country of their birth because they are not
Muslim. In most Islamic countries, non-Muslims cannot own land and
their children are not allowed to attend the better schools. source:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=254
For hundreds of years the Middle East was the embodiment of real
multicultural ideal, the thesaurus of spiritual and philosophical
knowledge. Antique mystery religions and Zoroastrism; the Ebonites and
the first Christian sects; Gnosticism and Kabbalistic teachings; the
Neoplatonics and the Manichees, the Arians and the Nestorians -- all
of them had co-existed in harmony… It was from this fathomless source,
that European philosophy, theology and learning got strength which
paved the way to freedom and liberal values… What has remained from
the multicultural world of the Middle East? Do the Zoroastrians and
Bahai's stay in Iran, their homeland? It will be easer to find them in
a cemetery in that country, than living. Those who could escape flew
to India and the West. Had the Sufis remained in Saudi Arabia? No,
they were annihilated by the regime as the enemies of "true Islam".
Can you find a branch of Ahmadiyya movement at least in one of the
countries of the Middle East?… The Christians of Iraq and the West
Bank escaped to the USA and Canada. Copts left Egypt… In 20-30 years
the Middle East will turn into a multicultural cemetery with an oasis
in the form of Israel… One more step, and instead of the cradle of
humanity only a scorched desert of hatred will be left here. And this
desert will spread to the North and South, to the East and West. It
will enter the open doors of your house; devour you and your family,
your clubs, cafes, libraries, theaters, and galleries. You have got
used to freedom; you don't know what the world without freedom is. I
know it because I have grown up in communist Moscow. But I also know
the Middle East. And believe me, in comparison to the new Caliphate
the Soviet empire of the 60ies and 70ies would seem a paradise. The
new rulers of the world will not only shut your mouth, but turn your
soul inside out. source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/Others/Islam-Multicultural-Cemetery-Open-Letter-Educated-Liberal.htm
There is an asymmetry between the good that many moderate Muslims can
do for Britain and the harm that a few fanatics can do to it. The 1-
in-1,000 chance that a man is a murderous fanatic is more important to
me than the 999-in-1,000 chance that he is not a murderous fanatic…
British society could get by perfectly well without the contribution
even of moderate Muslims. The only thing we really want from Muslims
is their oil money for bank deposits, to prop up London property
prices and to sustain the luxury market; their cheap labor that we
imported in the 1960s in a vain effort to bolster the dying textile
industry, which could not find local labor, is now redundant. source:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-op-dalrymple8jul08,0,6923090.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions
Alqaeda members live in the West and get total protection and
financial support from the infidels. They do not even have to worry
about going to work. This is taken care of, thanks to the infidel’s
welfare system, which gives the jihadists the vital time to focus on
their jihad activities. Almost all of the terrorists arrested in the
UK benefited from the state’s welfare system while they were planning
for the destruction of that very system and the state altogether… As a
result of the military jihad, America now spends millions of dollars
to protect its airlines from being hijacked, bombed or shot down,
while the Arab airlines are busy reaping profits from the confident
passengers who know well that by flying in an Arab airliner they are
unlikely targets for Islamic terrorism. A terrorists’ attack on an
American city would result in raised alert level for weeks with severe
disruption of normal life throughout the country and the loss of
billions of dollars. On the other hand, life in the cities of the Arab
world continues just as normal, after the initial dancing in the
streets, with no fear at all that an American reprisal in kind will
ever take place… Soon after 9/11, the sale of many American products
in the Middle East came to a near standstill and many American
businesses had to shut down their operations. MacDonald’s restaurants
in the Middle East, which are partly owned by local Arab companies,
had a hard time explaining to the public they were joint ventures and
had nothing to do with the American policies. The pressure of the
market forced the American fast food chain to donate a proportion of
its profits to the Palestinians in a desperate attempt to retain
customers… In the Middle East, no Arab will doubt that Marks&Spencers
donates its Saturday’s revenues to finance Israel’s war efforts. In
the Middle East, anti Western rumours spread fast among the Arabs and
are readily believed even by the professionals and intellectuals! In
the West, mosques and Islamic centres usually take the lead in
steering the war; they regularly update their communities on which
stores or businesses to avoid. source: http://www.islam-watch.org/MuminSalih/Trade-Jihad.htm
A Shiite Muslim can't build a mosque in Cairo; his Sunni brother can't
have a mosque of his own in Tehran. Editions of the Koran printed in
Egypt or Saudi Arabia are seized as contraband in Iran; Egypt and most
other Muslim nations in turn ban the import of Korans printed in Iran.
The works of a majority of Muslim writers and philosophers are banned
in most Muslim countries. source: http://tinyurl.com/2ggld6
"Where are the mass protests against the Saudi Wahhabite destruction
of the birthplace of Muhammad in Mecca? Or systematic annihilation of
Muslim heritage in Medina? Or the organised desecration of the
Prophet's family's tombs across Saudi Arabia?" - Ed Husain source:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2220483,00.html
Laughing is an unacceptable behavior in Islam and it’s against
Mohammad’ teachings. source: http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=742
To become a Muslim, you must take an Arab name, dress like an Arab,
speak Arabic, eat only what Arabs eat, treat your wife as Arabs treat
their wives, etc… Such things as blue jeans are not really condemned
because they are immoral but because they are not Arab. source:
http://www.chick.com/information/religions/islam/quran.asp
All sports like football, cricket, volleyball, basketball etc. will be
prohibited. Islam does not condone any types of sports for recreation
purposes. Sport of any type is considered the game of Satan. Praying
five times a day is their main sports. All forms of drama, theaters
and cinema are deadly illegal in Islam; hence will be strictly
prohibited by Islamic shariah. Islamic morality/virtue police
(Muttawalli) will roam the country to stop these Satanic vices and
will severely punish with beatings and lashing, if anybody violates
the code of Islamic virtues. In the Islamic Shariah laws, music is
considered weapons of Satan (Devil); hence music of all kinds are
strictly prohibited. Only vocal music of religious nature (commonly
known as Gazzal), which exalts the greatness of Allah and his prophet,
is allowed. All instrumental music, i.e. all musical instruments is
strictly prohibited. Violators are punished or imprisoned. Islam does
not allow drawings or sculpturing of any living beings (such as
humans, animals and birds). The drawings of plants and vines will be
allowed, because the Islamic God thought plants and vines were
lifeless objects! Punishments for the crimes (like stealing, adultery,
killings etc.) will be cutting/chopping hands, feet and even chopping
heads, or stoning death and lashings one hundred and one times.
Present Islamic paradises like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan,
Sudan and many other Arab nations randomly practice these above
mentioned punishments according to Islamic Sharia or hudud laws.
Islamic shariah laws will also control people’s sexual life and
marriage life. Shariah will dictate when, what and how to do sexual
acts. Usage of condom etc. will be prohibited. Love acts of all types
will be strictly prohibited at the outside of the private home. Even
the family lives in the Islamic country are controlled by the Sharia
laws. Family planning such as birth-control will be strictly
prohibited. source: http://www.islam-watch.org/Shabana/real_islam.pdf
Even though you are not ethnically an Arab, you must keep an Arabic
name, follow Arabic culture; adopt their food, clothing, hygiene and
toilet habits; memorise their Holy Scriptures without comprehending a
single word of it and prostrate endlessly to their Allah. When you go
on pilgrimage or when they hire you as slaves to work for them they
ridicule you as a 'miskin' (indigent). But they treat the white
infidel workers with respect and offer them higher pay and more fringe
benefits than the black and brown immigrant workers (like you). Though
you are better qualified than many of them (white infidels) your Arab
brothers discriminate you against the white infidel workers. As a
general rule, you are paid half compared to a white unbeliever. Yet,
you consider the Arabs superior to you and you imitate their dress and
Bedouin habits. Some Islamic Paradises (like Pakistan) even broadcast
news in Arabic when not even 0.1% of their population understand the
Arabic language. You wonder why a desperately poor country should
spend money to Arabise its population? source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/AbulKasem/AK_apostacy.htm)
According to Sharia law: Arab women cannot marry non-Arab men because
Allah has chosen the Arabs above others. (m4.2(1), p.523) Jihad is
obligatory for every Muslim who is able to perform it, male or female
(o9.3, p.601). Women and children captured in a jihad become the
slaves of Muslims; the women’s previous marriage is immediately
annulled (o9.13; p.604). Citizenship in an Islamic country is severely
restricted (o11.0, p.607). Toothpaste is offensive. (e3.0, e3.1, p.
53). Shaving beard is unlawful/offensive (e4.1(2), p.58). Insurance is
unlawful. (w42.0, p.942). TV is unlawful (w50.10, p.964). A Muslim man
is allowed to beat his wife or wives (the Qur’an, 4:34; m10.12, p.541;
o17.4, p.619). source: Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq)
translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller,
http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=8AD3D2F1-FD2C-4E78-B233-2F97FCF97B94
Recently I had the experience of travelling by train from Karachi to
Islamabad. More often than not, there was no water in the (train)
compartments, for no sooner was the overhead tank filled with water
than it was consumed in a frenzy of ablution (wazu) by the pious
preparing themselves for prayer… Government offices practically don’t
become functional until 9:30 or 10:00 and close for business about
2:30 or so. This five-hour working day is further reduced by an
extended ‘prayer break’ or waqfa barae namaz. During this break, the
pious pray, others socialise or just loaf around… I am told of
instances when groups of holies have commenced congregational prayer
(ba-jama’at namaz) in the aisles of planes as they prepare for
landing. In some cases, even cabin crew have made themselves
incommunicado from passengers by drawing curtains with the notice
‘prayer break’… Morality has become synonymous with, and reduced to, a
dress code for women, preferably the veil. Human rights, good customer
service, politeness in public, adherence to contractual obligations,
facilities for the handicapped, public toilets, voluntary work,
donations to secular charities and equality before the law are not
considered worthy objectives, and are conspicuous by their absence in
Muslim countries. source: http://www.muslim-refusenik.com/news/dailytimes-01-18-07.htm
However secular the tastes of the young Muslim men, they strongly wish
to maintain the male dominance they have inherited from their parents.
A sister who has the temerity to choose a boyfriend for herself, or
who even expresses a desire for an independent social life, is likely
to suffer a beating, followed by surveillance of Stasi-like
thoroughness. The young men instinctively understand that their
inherited system of male domination — which provides them, by means of
forced marriage, with sexual gratification at home while
simultaneously freeing them from domestic chores and allowing them to
live completely Westernized lives outside the home, including further
sexual adventures into which their wives cannot inquire — is strong
but brittle, rather as communism was: it is an all or nothing
phenomenon, and every breach must meet swift punishment.
http://www.city-journal.org/html/15_4_suicide_bombers.html
A poll of more than 1,000 British Muslims, conducted by the Policy
Exchange think-tank this year (2007), found that 36 per cent of
Muslims aged between 16 and 24 believe those who convert to another
faith should be punished by death. source:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,2170160,00.html
The apostate should not be put to death until he has been asked to
repent three times. This is the view of the majority of scholars,
including ‘Umar, ‘Ali, ‘Ata’, al-Nakhaii, Maalik, al-Thawri, al-
Awzaa’i, Ishaaq and others. Because apostasy comes about because of
doubt, and cannot be dispelled in an instant. Time should be allowed
for the person to rethink the matter, and the best length of time is
three days. The saheeh Sunnah indicates that it is essential to put
the apostate to death. Al-Bukhaari (6922) narrated that Ibn ‘Abbaas
said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) said: “Whoever changes his religion, put him to death.” Al-
Bukhaari (6484) and Muslim (1676) narrated that ‘Abd-Allaah ibn
Mas’ood said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah
be upon him) said: “It is not permissible to shed the blood of a
Muslim who bears witness that there is no god except Allaah and that I
am the Messenger of Allaah, except in one of three cases: a soul for a
soul (i.e., in the case of murder); a previously-married person who
commits zina; and one who leaves his religion and separates from the
main body of the Muslims.” source: http://www.islam-qa.com/index.php?ref=14231&ln=eng&txt=apostasy
Not only did Muhammad’s own companions put to the sword followers of
other religion, but they even fought each other. Thousands of Muslims
were killed in the Ridda wars, which were waged merely to keep Arab
tribes from following their desire to leave Islam… Muhammad’s favorite
daughter and favorite wife even marched armies against one another in
a precursor to the violent split between Sunni and Shia. source:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Articles/Nadir-Shamoun-debate.htm
simple.lan...@gmail.com
As a child, I was asked to memorize the verses of Koran. I used to ask
the Hujur (Mullah) what meanings were conveyed by those verses? The
reply I used to get from the Hujur was a few strokes of the cane and
rebukes. He used to say that one should never ask any question on the
matter of Islam especially on Koran. The penalty for asking questions
is whipping. source: http://www.islam-watch.org/AbulKasem/breaking_the_manacles.htm
"The Qur’an claims for itself that it is ‘mubeen,’ or clear, but if
you just look at it, you will see that every fifth sentence or so
simply doesn’t make sense… If the Qur’an is not comprehensible, if it
can’t even be understood in Arabic, then it’s not translatable into
any language." - Gerd Puin
Koran is full of internal contradictions, scientific errors and
historical blunders. 54:19 mentions Aad was destroyed in a day but
69:6,7 mentions Aad was destroyed in seven nights and eight days;
19:17 shows an angel appeared to Mary but 3:42 shows several angels
appeared; 28:40 mentions pharaoh drowned and died but 10:92 states
that the same pharaoh was saved; 18:86 states that sun sets in a muddy
spring of water; 15:19 mentions earth is flat; 86:6,7 states that
semen emits from between back-bone and the ribs; 19:27,28 states that
Mary was the sister of Aaron, whereas history shows they were born
about 1300 years apart; 28:8 tells that pharaoh and Haman were living
at the same time and place whereas history clearly shows they were
born about 1000 years apart and pharaoh lived in Egypt and Haman lived
in Shushan city in Persia; and 4:157 says that Jesus was not crucified
whereas it is crystal clear in historical records that Jesus was
crucified and not another man who looked like Jesus. By the way, the
transliterated name of Jesus in arabic Quran is Isa but even this is
wrong because the name of Esau, brother of Jacob (Yaqub in arabic) is
Isa in arabic. The correct transliterated name of Jesus in arabic is
Yasu. Isa (Esau) means ‘hairy’ and Yasu (Jesus) means ‘God saves.’
source: http://islam-watch.org/LeavingIslam/Why-I-Quit-Islam.htm
According to Koran, Allah created man from:
Sura 3:59 dust
Sura 15:26 dried clay of altered mud
Sura 16:4 mixed drops of male and female sexual discharge
Sura 24:45 water
Sura 35:11 dust
Sura 75:37 mixed drops of male and female sexual discharge
Sura 96:2 blood clot
Any religion that requires total obedience without thought is not
likely to produce people capable of critical thought, people capable
of free and independent thought. Such a situation is favorable to the
development of a powerful "clergy" and is clearly responsible for the
intellectual, cultural, and economic stagnation of several centuries.
Illiteracy remains high in Muslim countries. Historically, as there
never was any separation of state and religion, any criticism of one
was seen as a criticism of the other… No Muslim country has developed
a stable democracy; Muslims are being subjected to every kind of
repression possible. Under these conditions healthy criticism of
society is not possible, because critical thought and liberty go
together… All innovations are discouraged in Islam - every problem is
seen as a religious problem rather than a social or economic one… If a
man were to break into a woman's dormitory and rape half a dozen
women, he would risk nothing since there would be no male witnesses.
Indeed a female victim of rape is unlikely to file a lawsuit because
she would risk being condemned herself and have little chance of
obtaining justice… According to Muslim jurists, the husband is not
obliged under Islamic law to pay for her (wife) medical expenses in
case of illness… According to Women's Action Forum, a woman's rights
organization, 72% of all women in police custody in Pakistan are
physically and sexually abused… Under Islamic law a woman cannot be
the head of state. source: http://islam-watch.org/IbnWarraq/Islam's-Shame-Veil-Tears.htm
The United Nations, in its 2002 Arab Human Development Report, found
that the total number of books translated into Arabic each year is no
more than 330, or one-fifth of those annually translated in a small
country like Greece. Indeed, the total number of books translated into
Arabic during the last 1,000 years, since the age of Caliph Al-
Ma’moun, (a ninth-century Arab ruler who was a patron of cultural
interaction between Arab, Persian, and Greek scholars) to this day is
less than those translated in Spain in one year… Muslims claim to have
contributed the numeral “Zero” to the sum total of human knowledge,
and alas, have continued to contribute zero ever since. source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/Warner/Gutenberg-and-the-Date-Palm.htm
Most of the scientists, poets and philosophers in Islam’s golden age
(the time of the Abassid Caliphate) were Jews, Christians or Muslims
who were suspected of apostasy or blasphemy. Many suffered harassment
and even death. Thus if science did flourish during this golden age,
it was in spite of Islam and not because of it. source:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/Ohmyrus/islam_failed_muslims.htm
Muslims claim many, many accomplishments we know they had nothing to
do with. Arabic numerals? From India. The concept of zero? From
Babylonia. Parabolic arches? From Assyria. The much ballyhooed claim
of translating the Greek corpus of knowledge into Arabic? It was the
Christian Assyrians, who first translated to Syriac, then to Arabic.
The first University? Not Al-Azhar in Cairo (988 A.D.), but the School
of Nisibis of the Church of the East (350 A.D.), which had three
departments: Theology, Philosophy and Medicine. Al-Azhar only teaches
Theology. Speaking of medicine, Muslims will claim that medicine
during the Golden Age of Islam, the Abbasid period, was the most
advanced in the world. That is correct. But what they don't say is
that the medical practitioners were exclusively Christians. The most
famous medical family, the Bakhtishu family, Assyrians of the Church
of the East, produced seven generations of doctors, who were the
official physicians to the Caliphs of Baghdad for nearly 200 years… In
his book How Greek Science Passed to the Arabs, O'Leary lists 22
scholars and translators during the Golden Age of Islam; 20 were
Christians, 1 was a Persian, and 1 was a Muslim. This covers about a
250 year period… It was al-Ghazali… who denounced natural laws, the
very objective of science, as a blasphemous constraint upon the free
will of Allah… Christianity asks the believer to think and analyze, to
interpret and deduce. Islam asks the believer to obey blindly and
without question. source: http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=4D818187-782D-4AA9-BEFA-64C5A00D9677
Islam was impermeable to much of Greek thought, the Arab world's
initial translations of it to Latin were not so much the work of
"Islam" but of Aramaeans and Christian Arabs, a wave of translations
of Aristotle began at the Mont Saint-Michel monastery in France 50
years before Arab versions of the same texts appeared in Moorish
Spain… Bayt al-Hikma, or the House of Wisdom, said to be created by
the Abassids in the ninth century, was limited to the study of Koranic
science, rather than philosophy, physics or mathematics, as understood
in the speculative context of Greek thought. source:
http://www.iht.com/bin/printfriendly.php?id=12398698
During the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the Organization of Arab Petroleum
Exporting Countries unleashed the oil weapon, embargoing critical oil
exports to the United States and Western Europe as a strategy for
compelling Israel to withdraw unconditionally from all territories
occupied in the 1967 war. The US rejected Arab demands, but the
European Community (EC, later EU), more dependent on Arab oil than
America, decided on a policy of outright appeasement. This led to a
series of quasi-official meetings between European and Arab officials
and experts that culminated in a meeting at the ministerial level in
Paris on July 31, 1974. There, an agreement was reached to initiate
the Euro-Arab Dialogue (EAD), an ongoing series of closed, high-level
meetings between senior officials of the two sides which would enable
the EC and the Arab League to formulate a new understanding on
economic, cultural, and diplomatic issues… Over time, the EAD would
institute a number of long-term policy agreements that guaranteed the
Europeans both an uninterrupted oil supply and lucrative export
contracts with oil-rich Arab states. In return, the Europeans would
facilitate international recognition of the PLO at a time when its
charter called for Israel's destruction, and enable Arab religious,
cultural, and intellectual institutions to achieve unprecedented
influence in Europe. The Arabs also pressured the EC to relax its
immigration rules and permit a massive influx of Muslims into Europe.
From its inception, every EAD meeting passed resolutions in support of
Muslim immigration to Europe. source: http://reformjudaismmag.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=1113
German author Henryk M. Broder recently told the Dutch newspaper De
Volkskrant that young Europeans who love freedom, better emigrate.
Europe as we know it will no longer exist 20 years from now. Whilst
sitting on a terrace in Berlin, Broder pointed to the other customers
and the passers-by and said melancholically: "We are watching the
world of yesterday." Europe is turning Muslim. As Broder is sixty
years old he is not going to emigrate himself. "I am too old," he
said. However, he urged young people to get out and "move to Australia
or New Zealand. That is the only option they have if they want to
avoid the plagues that will turn the old continent uninhabitable."
Many Germans and Dutch, apparently, did not wait for Broder's advice.
The number of emigrants leaving the Netherlands and Germany has
already surpassed the number of immigrants moving in. One does not
have to be prophetic to predict, like Henryk Broder, that Europe is
becoming Islamic. Just consider the demographics. The number of
Muslims in contemporary Europe is estimated to be 50 million. It is
expected to double in twenty years. By 2025, one third of all European
children will be born to Muslim families. Today Mohammed is already
the most popular name for new-born boys in Brussels, Amsterdam,
Rotterdam, and other major European cities. Broder is convinced that
the Europeans are not willing to oppose islamization. "The dominant
ethos," he told De Volkskrant, "is perfectly voiced by the stupid
blonde woman author with whom I recently debated. She said that it is
sometimes better to let yourself be raped than to risk serious
injuries while resisting. source: http://www.islamreview.com/articles/awakenedsecularists.shtml
In the United States a foreigner who becomes naturalized has to
declare, on oath, “that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure
all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state,
or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or
citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of
the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and
domestic.” A declaration of this kind, of not a solemn oath of
allegiance, is expected from naturalized citizens in most European
countries. For a Muslim to declare all of the above in good faith, and
especially that he accepts an “infidel,” i.e. non-Muslim document or
law as the source of his highest loyalty, is an act of apostasy par
excellence, punishable by death under the Islamic law. The sharia, to
a Muslim, is not an addition to the “secular” legal code with which it
coexists; it is the only true code, the only basis of obligation. To
be legitimate, all political power therefore must rest exclusively
with those who enjoy Allah’s authority on the basis of his revealed
will - and for as long as they remain infidel, both Europe and America
are illegitimate. So how can a self-avowedly devout Muslim take the
oath, and expect the rest of us to believe that it was done in good
faith? Because he is practicing taqiyya, the art of elaborate lying
that was inaugurated by Muhammad to help destabilize and undermine non-
Muslim communities almost ripe for a touch of Jihad. (Or else because
he is not devout enough and confused, but in that case there is the
ever-present danger that at some point he will rediscover his roots.)
source: http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/05/counterjihad-vienna-2008.html
The attack on America was like a fire bell ringing, waking other
countries up to the growing masses of Muslims in their midst. It was
noticed that these Muslims made no effort to blend in with the local
population. Instead, Muslims banded together, taking over
neighborhoods and eventually driving out the non-Muslims. Any
acceptance of the local culture and customs was strongly discouraged
and often severely punished. These Muslim neighborhoods set up their
own legal system of Islamic law, ignoring the laws of the land.
Immigrants were encouraged to have very large families to form huge
voting blocks to maneuver Muslims into positions of power within the
government… Many Islamic leaders state emphatically that Islam and
democracy cannot co-exist. Muslims are expected to have only one
master and that master is Islam. Islam dictates every aspect of their
lives from birth to death… American Muslims are now petitioning that
the call to prayer be blasted over loud speakers five times a day in
quiet neighborhoods and towns. source: http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/stock/051019
And if we allow Muslims to have complete religious freedom, will we
also allow their Muezzins to broadcast the Islamic call to prayer over
loudspeakers five times a day – at dawn, at midday, in mid-afternoon,
at sunset, and two hours after sunset – in every city and town in
America? And if we find a way to prohibit them from doing so, how long
will it be before Muslims and the ACLU use the “equal protection”
clause of our Constitution to prohibit Christian churches from
sounding their steeple bells on Sunday morning? source:
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/21775.html
Prime Minister Gordon Brown told the nation that "we have got to
separate those great moderate members of our community from a few
extremists who wish to practice violence and inflict maximum loss of
life in the interests of a perversion of their religion." By contrast,
a former jihadist from Manchester wrote that the "real engine of our
violence" is "Islamic theology." Months ago, this young man informed
me that as a militant he raised most of his war chest not from
obscenely rich Saudis, but from middle-class Muslim dentists living in
the United Kingdom. There's sobering lesson here for the new prime
minister. So far, those arrested in connection to the car bombs are,
by and large, medical professionals. The seeming paradox of the
privileged seeking to avenge grievance has many champions of
compassion scratching their heads. Aren't Muslim martyrs supposed to
be poor, disenfranchised, and resentful about both? source:
ttp://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/07082007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/islams_problem_opedcolumnists_irshad_manji.htm
Jihad is a duty of every Muslim… Jihad… does not recognise any…
permanent peace because such a permanent peace does not match the
necessary expansion of “Dar-al-Islam”. source:
http://www.mideastyouth.com/2007/09/05/jihad-is-a-justification-of-aggression/
Should the situation arise where a practicing Muslim, loyal to the
faith, were to be questioned about a suspected terrorist operation or
criminal activity being planed or perpetrated by a fellow Muslim –
whether here in the United States or anywhere in the world – that
Muslim must employ taqiyya. This makes the gathering of credible
information from within the Islamic community, regarding the criminal
Islamic community, virtually impossible. source:
http://newmediajournal.us/staff/fsalvato/11162007.htm
Terror groups have tried to use the guise of injury to pass security.
Being in a wheelchair, wearing a cast, posing as gravely ill to “get
treatment” in the States, and claiming asylum are all techniques
employed by various groups… There have even been cases of Middle
Eastern individuals posing as Mexicans to cross the Southern U.S.
border, knowing that the U.S. government is sympathetic toward illegal
immigrants… Islamic terrorists have been using many disguises to hide
themselves. They hide in South America and work to convert indigenous
people to Islam… There are innumerable vulnerabilities in the U.S. As
a criminal profiler who has consulted with police and members of U.S.
Military Intelligence, I see many similarities between serial murder
and terrorism. Serial killers become whatever they need to be in order
to get close to their victims. They have had jobs as doctors, police
officers, military officers, pharmacists, and teachers. One can be
sure, that if the lone serial killer is smart enough to get into these
positions, a well financed terror organization can do the same.
Remember, people are not always what they appear to be. source:
http://www.aim.org/guest_column/5760_0_6_0_C/
Once a sleeper has succeeded in entering a country he is intent on
attacking, his goal is to establish himself (herself) in a community
and take on a pedestrian appearance. Such sleepers seek employment
that provides them with camouflage and mobility. We have seen
terrorists such as Mahmoud Abouhalima who entered our country as a
tourist and then overstayed his authorized period of admission. He
subsequently applied for amnesty under the agricultural worker
provisions of the disastrous Amnesty of 1986, falsely claiming to have
been a farmer. His application for amnesty was approved and he drove a
taxicab in New York City. The only thing he ever planted was a bomb in
the basement of the World Trade Center complex that was detonated on
September 26, 1993, killing 6, injuring hundreds of innocent victims
and inflicting an estimated 500 million dollars in damages to that
iconic complex, nearly toppling one of the towers! source:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/homeland.php?id=1384797
Even the Westerners who perceive a danger rarely grasp its full scope.
Religious war simply does not fit with their understanding of the
world. While they may be able to grasp the notion of Islamic terrorism
or “Islamofascism,” it is inconceivable that Islam itself could be
hostile. They assume, without questioning, that all religions are
basically the same, and that all religions teach about peace and love.
source: http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=756
The elite newspapers, with the exception of The Wall Street Journal,
systematically censor the news in order to downplay the threat, or at
worst, literally distort the facts to falsely portray radical Islamic
groups in the United States as victims, which is exactly in line with
the victimology propagated by these groups. If misreporting were a
crime, a lot of reporters would be in jail. source:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1189411449079&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter
The West has been hampered by a festering and self-inflicted wound: a
reluctance to identify its foe as the totalitarian, Islamic-based
ideology that it is. Instead, our elites call forth a politically
correct haze to shroud the jihadist elephant in the room. Media
outlets invoke euphemisms about rocket-launching "militants" and car-
torching "youths…" The conflict between Islamic expansionists and the
West does not stem from political disagreements that can be assuaged
by dialogue or compromise. Radical Islam seeks to wear down and
ultimately destroy its opponent -- in Iraq, Israel, Europe, and
everywhere else. We must focus on doing the same to radical Islam.
source: http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/08/the_art_of_the_long_war.html
A recent and very typical article from an Egyptian newspaper speaks
characteristically of the U.S. as “the cancer, the malignant wound, in
the body of Arabism, for which there is no cure but eradication…” We
face suicidal mass killings with unconventional weapons in the future
not because there exists a small number of insane terrorist murderers,
but because we are embroiled – however unwittingly – in an authentic
clash of civilizations. source: http://www.analyst-network.com/article.php?art_id=1710
Terror Free Tomorrow of Vienna, Virginia and the Pakistan Institute
for Public Opinion conducted a poll in Pakistan on August 18-29, 2007
to determine approval ratings of some organizations and politicians.
Poll results (approval ratings): al Qaeda = 43%, Taliban = 38%, local
Muslim extremist groups = from 37% to 49%, Osama bin Laden = 46%,
Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf = 38%. source:
http://edition.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/09/11/poll.pakistanis/index.html
Peru is said to be one of Osama Bin Laden’s favorite training locales…
In South America, Islamists have met inside Catholic churches to avoid
raising a red flag. They have worn crucifixes, taken on Christian
names, attended Christian services, stolen dead Christians’ birth
certificates, stolen the identity of a dead Catholic priest, and
sought asylum under the pretext of being a persecuted Christian. By
attempting to blend in using the cover of a different religion, the
terrorists believe that scrutiny will be minimized… Puerto Ricans can
come to the mainland any time they want. Fraudulent documents are a
huge industry there as illegals and terror operatives look to enter
the island illegally, obtain fake paperwork, and then simply come to
the mainland. source: http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/terrorism.php?id=1325399
A recent study by the London-based Transparency International found
that Middle Eastern and North African nations form the world’s most
corrupt region. source: http://www.canadafreepress.com/2003/inter102003.htm
Repressive laws, supplemented and reinforced by terrorists, vigilantes
and mob violence, are a fundamental barrier to open discussion and
dissent, and so to democracy and free societies, within the Muslim
world. source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/28/AR2007092801358.html
The architectural design of mosques, for example, long a source of
pride among Muslims, was copied from the shape and structure of
Byzantine churches… The seventh-century Dome of the Rock, considered
today to have been first great mosque, was not only copied from
Byzantine models, but was built by Byzantine craftsmen… The astrolabe
was developed, if not perfected, long before Muhammad was born.
Avicenna (980-1037), Averroes (1128-1198), and the other Muslim
philosophers built on the work of the pagan Greek Aristotle. And
Aristotle’s work was preserved from the ravages of the Dark Ages not
first by Muslims, but by Christians such as the fifth-century priest
Probus of Antioch, who introduced Aristotle to the Arabic-speaking
world. The Christian Huneyn ibn-Ishaq (809-873) translated many works
by Aristotle, Galen, Plato and Hippocrates into Syriac, from which
they were translated into Arabic by his son. The Jacobite Christian
Yahya ibn ‘Adi (893-974) also translated works of philosophy into
Arabic, and wrote his own; his treatise The Reformation of Morals has
occasionally been erroneously attributed to various of his Muslim
contemporaries. His student, another Christian named Abu ‘Ali ‘Isa ibn
Zur’a (943-1008), also made Arabic translations of Aristotle and other
Greek writers from Syriac. The first Arabic-language medical treatise
was written by a Christian priest and translated into Arabic by a
Jewish doctor in 683. The first hospital, another source of pride
among Muslims and often a prominent feature of Islamic accomplishment
lists, was founded in Baghdad during the Abbasid caliphate by a
Nestorian Christian. A pioneering medical school was founded at
Gundeshapur in Persia — by Assyrian Christians. The world’s first
university may not have been the Muslims’ Al-Azhar in Cairo, as is
often claimed, but the Assyrian School of Nisibis. source:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/006014.php
Islam's much-vaunted "golden age" was in reality the twilight of the
conquered pre-Islamic cultures, an echo of times passed. The brief
cultural blossoming during the first centuries of Islamic rule owed
its existence almost entirely to the pre-Islamic heritage in a region
that was still, for a while, majority non-Muslim… Jihad piracy and
slavery remained a serious threat to Europeans for more than a
thousand years. As historian Ibn Khaldun proudly proclaimed about the
early Middle Ages: "The Christian could no longer float a plank upon
the sea." The reason why the West for centuries didn't have easy
access to the Classical learning of the Byzantine Empire was because
endemic Muslim raids made the Mediterranean unsafe for regular travel.
It has to be the height of absurdity to block access to something and
then take credit for transmitting it, yet that is precisely what
Muslims do. source: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3017/print
Terrorist networks are not simply bin Ladens and al Zawahiris. They
are also passport forgers, messengers, secretaries, financial
supporters, recruiters, propagandists — a whole network of individuals
cooperating together, at various levels of involvement, in an
enterprise. And beyond the core membership itself, numerous
individuals and organizations are specifically aware of the
activities, location, and membership of a terrorist network; without
the complicity of this broader group a network cannot survive, let
alone thrive, as Mao aptly described. These people and organizations
help a terrorist network to operate. Therefore they are, to varying
degrees, culpable. source: http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/19466429.html
72 terrorist organizations with thousands of operatives exist and
operate within the borders of the United States. These organizations
include: Hezbollah, Hamas, Abu Sayyaf, Islamic Jihad, al Fuqra, the
Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda. source: http://www.basicsproject.org/terrorism/terrorism.htm
France will pay Muslim immigrants to return home. Under the scheme,
Paris will provide each family with a nest egg of €6,000 ($8,000) for
when they go back to their country of origin. A similar scheme, which
was introduced in 2005 and 2006, was taken up by around 3,000
families. source: http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,484716,00.html
The struggle between good and evil is the struggle between diversity
and its absence. Western diversity begets more diversity because we
thrive in diverse environments. Evil religions, evil ideologies, and
evil regimes behave like cancer - they attempt to conquer the world by
destroying its diversity. Most Westerners appease these deadly cancers
believing that tolerating the intolerance is a virtue that prevents a
war. They have the same mindset as their parents who branded Winston
Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt as warmongers. There is no
greater contrast between good and evil than the contrast between
Israel and Saudi Arabia. Tiny, yet diverse Israel makes great
contributions to science and technology. A much bigger, oil rich Saudi
Arabia is the most barbaric country on the face of the Earth and the
greatest exporter of Wahhabism and suicide bombers because its Muslim
rulers do not tolerate diversity. Islam was conceived in a desert and
it survives in its most pure form only in a desert. Desert is
synonymous with the lack of biodiversity, and is often associated with
the lack of other forms of diversity as well. It is very unnatural,
prison like environment for us, because healthy humans revere
diversity. When we are forced to live in this unnatural environment,
we adjust to it by loosing our reverence for diversity and by
glorifying this psychopathic flaw of our mind. This is perfect
environment for a religion that is the antithesis of diversity.
source: http://www.islandone.org/LEOBiblio/DIVERSIT.HTM
simple.lan...@gmail.com
Obsession (very good film about Islam):
(best parts, 11 minutes) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76STxsWJCCE
(part 1, 39 minutes) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8662467646661149069
(part 2, 9 minutes) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2379593167878434106
(part 3, 9 minutes) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=923759196750871367
(part 4, 9 minutes) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3347862095172919551
(part 5, 9 minutes) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7134286674402163481
Must-see - Nick Griffin explains the Islamization of Europe (57 min.):
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8336123906443296275
Must-see (or hear) Brigitte Gabriel's speech about Muslims (58
minutes):
http://www.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev092706a.cfm
Must-see (or hear) Andrew G. Bostom explains Jihad and dhimmitude:
http://www.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev050906a.cfm
The best books about Islam: "Why I Am Not A Muslim" (http://
tinyurl.com/2jgb89), "Leaving Islam" (http://tinyurl.com/ysc9xf) by
Ibn Warraq, "Infidel" (http://tinyurl.com/ywgb7e) by Ayaan Hirsi Ali
and (http://tinyurl.com/37kda6) "Why We Want to Kill You" by Walid
Shoebat
The best books about the Islamization of Europe: "America
Alone" (http://www.amazon.com/America-Alone-End-World-Know/dp/
1596985275/) by Mark Steyn, "While Europe Slept" (http://tinyurl.com/
342nhg) by Bruce Bawer, "The Coming Balkan Caliphate" (http://
www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0275995259) by Christopher Deliso
Essential facts about Islam: http://www.masada2000.org/islam.html
History of Jihad: http://www.wikiislam.com/wiki/History_of_Jihad
The best short videos about Islam: http://islamwatchers.blogspot.com/
Dan Dennett explains how Islam infects our minds:
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/116
Interview with Brigitte Gabriel:
first half: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=20232
second half: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=20438
Abul Kasem explains Islam:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID=2297E37D-87C3-492E-8E5D-1808AF77F703
Islamification of Europe:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID=B42AC4E4-73A3-4589-AFA5-27D54D7C0AB3
Islam in Europe:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nI5WoXpmPiM
Islam in Europe:
part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9SI_yEkwr4
part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcZDH-HHUaw
part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ztk7eyBfiE
part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRo2o2Qk3HE
part 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LL32JIZu5DM
part 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg5-DLd8yac
part 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBezZEmIS34
part 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1pjPeiL_7U
A few words about the world's fastest growing religion:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/016621.php
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fa8_1182431311
Wafa Sultan speaks about Islam:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xohIzs6xvfE
Debate about Islam on Al-Jazeera TV:
http://www.memritv.org/clip/en/1600.htm
Arabs do not understand the meaning of freedom:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_SELD45iMY
Islam? No thanks!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM9SYfqKNuA
Four Stages of Islamic Treachery:
http://www.islam-watch.org/Others/Stages-of-Islamization.htm
Robert Spencer, Truth About Muhammad (piss be upon him, 64 min.):
http://www.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev111406a.cfm
Short interviews with Ayaan Hirsi Ali:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3tgY_eI_P0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b04pjSiTWUQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6Wrhivp7eQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg8AYs56RAY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08EYqwyns-k
Interview with Nonie Darwish about Islam:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=26094
Nonie Darwish, Now They Call Me Infidel:
http://www.heritage.org/Press/Events/ev111506a.cfm
Criticism of Islam:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Islam
Historical persecution by Muslims:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_persecution_by_Muslims
Ali Sina's articles about Islam:
source: http://www.islam-watch.org/AliSina/How-to-Beat-Jihad.htm
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=Sections&req=viewarticle&artid=1&page=1
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/2005/04/005810print.html
http://www.islam-watch.org/AliSina/index.html
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Author/Sina.htm
Islamic websites:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRc9UByJJsk
Undercover video reveals Muslim plans for the West:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peFQWuk4nuo
Jihad and the American Left:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/11/jihad_and_the_american_left.html
Statistical data about Islamization of Europe: Timothy M. Savage,
Europe and Islam: Crescent Waxing, Cultures Clashing, The Washington
Quarterly, Summer 2004. http://www.twq.com/04summer/docs/04summer_savage.pdf
A Creche Without Christians:
http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=NWEwZGJiMDEyOWU0ZWM0YWNmMThmMmQyOWQyZDM1OGI=
Fanatics ruled the world because the peaceful majority did not speak
up until it was too late: http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/29169.html
When Britain, Israel, the United States or any other country gets
attacked by Muslims, this is always blamed by the media on past
colonial history, occupation, aggressive foreign policy etc. Well,
Sweden doesn't have a colonial history, its political establishment is
among the most anti-Israeli in Europe and Swedish media have always
been critical of US policies. Muslim immigration to the country has
created the worst rape wave in Scandinavian history (which was
indirectly blamed on global warming by the nation's largest newspaper
some weeks ago), and the authorities have more or less abandoned their
third largest city, Malmö, to Muslim gangs. source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/Fjordman/Sweden-Learns-Appeasement-Does-not-Pay.htm
Roughly two-thirds (65%) of adult Muslims living in the United States
were born elsewhere, and 39% have come to the U.S. since 1990. A
relatively large proportion of Muslim immigrants are from Arab
countries, but many also come from Pakistan and other South Asian
countries. Among native-born Muslims, slightly more than half are
African American… A careful study in San Diego, California, found that
the Muslim population there was capable of doubling every six years.
But a more rigorous study in Illinois found the Muslim population in
that state doubled every 17 years, or only about a third of the
increase estimated in San Diego. source: http://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/muslim-americans.pdf
According to various reports, at least 80% of U.S. Mosques follow or
are influenced by the Wahhabi sect of Saudi Arabia. Among other
things, this sect believes it is a “religious obligation” to hate
Christians and Jews and to think of the United States as “enemy
territory.” In 2006, Bernard Lewis, one of the world’s leading
scholars on Islam, called Wahhabism, “The most radical, the most
violent, the most extreme and fanatical version of Islam.” source:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/ (September 25, 2007)
Radical Islamist groups, most tied to Saudi-sponsored Wahhabi
organizations suspected by the U.S. government of being closely linked
to terror financing activities, dominate Muslim prison recruitment in
the U.S. and seek to create a radicalized cadre of felons who will
support their anti-American efforts. Due to their efforts, the
population of Muslim inmates has reached approximately 350,000 (in
2003) with 30,000-40,000 added each year. These converted inmates are
mostly African American with a small but growing Hispanic minority.
source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prison_Islam_in_the_United_States
A typical madrassa usually offers two courses of study: a hifz course
(the memorization of the Koran) and an 'alim course leading the
candidate to become an accepted scholar in the community. A regular
curriculum includes courses in Arabic, Koranic interpretation
(Tafsir), Islamic law (Sharia), recorded sayings and deeds of the
Prophet Muhammad (Hadith), logic (Mantiq), and Muslim history. In a
great many madrassas throughout the world – most notably Pakistan,
Iran, Egypt and Saudi Arabia – the teachings have a militant and
agenda-driven bent and include ideological and political
indoctrination, a constituent of which is promulgating hatred against
the West and Western civilization. source:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/terrorism.php?id=1384972
Moderate Muslims: http://www.aina.org/news/20070930022150.htm
Radical Islam is taking over Europe and West:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocU5x_03MDM
Islamization of Europe:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29i_y0dQg0Q
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7801911443405277650&q
The real Islam revealed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9qRwv39YCk
Lynching in Islam:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Gallery/7.htm
Islam around the world:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hz-bTNxpApU
Cleric Abu Abdullah on CNN:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1817039565075741443
Ex-Islamic terrorists speak out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZFYLAxfQ_I
Islam's war against Buddhism:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=27700
Palestinians celebrate 9/11 attack:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMOZvbYJMvU
Reasons for decline of the Muslim world:
http://archive.gulfnews.com/articles/07/05/02/10122223.html
Nostalgia of Islamic Golden Age:
http://www.islam-watch.org/SyedKamranMirza/Nostalgia-of-Islamic-Golden-Age.htm
The myth of Islamic tolerance:
http://kenlydell.typepad.com/islamic_evil/muslim_intolerance/index.html
Andalusian myth, Eurabian reality:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/dhimmiwatch/archives/2004/04/001665print.html
Islam, Middle East and Fascism (long but excellent article by
Ibn Warraq): http://www.islam-watch.org/IbnWarraq/Fascism.htm
Islamic humor:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/comics/comics.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_Y-sw89qTY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHZUaW8iuzE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWT-C2VygBw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhjnAVnY5ns
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6SRGRshiSM
http://kenlydell.typepad.com/photos/cartoons/who_are_you_kidding.jpg
http://kenlydell.typepad.com/photos/cartoons/purity1.jpg
http://kenlydell.typepad.com/photos/cartoons/eurabia.jpg
http://kenlydell.typepad.com/photos/cartoons/safest.jpg
http://www.pblakeney.com/img/cartoons/cartoon_091106.gif
http://www.internetcurrentevents.com/cox-forkum_cartoon1.gif
http://www.islamcomicbook.com
Frank Sinatra's song (Strangers On My Flight):
http://www.laughingatislam.com/imagessite/sinatra.mp3
Lyrics: http://www.laughingatislam.com/strangers.html
MEMRI Compilation of Muslim opinions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JplfzQ9PkTg
Ex-Muslims' Survey:
http://www.geocities.com/exmuslims_survey/index.html
Happy 60th birthday, Israel:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/print/the-magazine/features/643426/happy-60th-birthday-israel-well-done-for-surviving.thtml
Since 1945, the number of Muslims killed by other Muslims outnumbers
those killed by Israelis by a factor that far exceeds 100-1. source:
http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=55137&v=9335610811
What really happened in the Middle East:
http://www.terrorismawareness.org/what-really-happened/
Facts about Israel: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeVvMJdvEX8
Treatment of Jews in Arab/Islamic Countries:
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/mf15.html
Who authored the Koran:
http://www.islam-watch.org/AbulKasem/WhoAuthoredQuran/who_authored_the_quran.htm
Contradictions in the Koran:
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/contra/by_name.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Qur%27an
Errors in the Koran:
Scribal Errors: http://members.aol.com/AlHaqq4u/scribal.html
Grammatical Errors: http://members.aol.com/AlHaqq4u/grammar.html
The Gate: http://members.aol.com/AlHaqq4u/gate.html
Zul-Qarnain: http://members.aol.com/AlHaqq4u/alex.html
Zul-Qarnain and the Sun: http://members.aol.com/AlHaqq4u/spring.html
Inventions to protect the miracle: http://members.aol.com/AlHaqq4u/inventions.html
Old manuscripts of the Koran: http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB120008793352784631.html
Detailed info about Muhammad and Koran:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfgJl7MKs1U
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=muhammadsquran&p=r
The most famous recent convert from Islam to Christianity is Dr.
Muhammed Rahoumy. He was the Dean of Al Azhar Islamic University in
Egypt - the oldest and most prestigious Islamic school of theology in
the world. Rahoumy (now Samuel Paul) left Islam in 2000, and now lives
in the USA.
"If all our theology is structured around the Sunni notion that one
tribe and one race is superior to everyone else, and the Shia notion
is that the family of the descendants of the prophet have a divine
right to be at the top, then our entire history is seen through this
prism. And by choosing sides, they're buying into the mythologies." -
Tarek Fatah
There are more religious sects in Islam than any monotheistic religion
in the world and animosity between these sects reflects nothing but
the bestial and tribal mentality of the 7th century Arab clans.
source: http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1647
simple.lan...@gmail.com
The major branches (of Islam) are Sunni, Shi’a and Sufi. We have four
schools of thought under the Sunni school of thought, Hanafi, Hanbali,
Maliki, and Shafi’i. Shi’a sects are Jafari, Ismailiyah, Zaiddiyah,
Alawi, Alevi, and Bohras. The Sufi orders are Bektashi, Qadiri,
Naqshbandi, Suhrawardiyya, and the Chi****i order. In addition to the
major branches within Islam, we have the sects of Kharijite (Ibadi,
Sufri), Kalam schools of thought (Ash’ari, Maturidi, Murjite, and
Mu’tazili). The movements within these sects are namely the Barelwi,
Deobandi, Salafis, Wahhabis, Liberals, and the Tablighi Jama’at. And
the famous, Zikri, Ahmadiya, Qaidyani and the Nation of Islam in
America. If you are a member of one sect, you view generally that your
sect is the “true” Islam and that all other sects are wrong (could
this be a conspiracy to keep us poor and stupid?). The biggest dilemma
that the entire Muslim nation faces is that every sect within Islam
believes that only if all Muslims would follow their view, Islam would
win back Allah’s favor and the glory of Islam would be restored. The
Salafist and Wahhabis are a perfect example; they have resorted to
violence, bloodshed, and killings. They believe that every other sect
within Islam is on the wrong path, therefore; all other sects within
Islam must follow their ideology; with the exception of Shi’a,
otherwise they will be humiliated, tortured or killed. Salafis and
Wahhabis have made a permanent takfir on the Shi’a and declared them
as Kuffar (Infidels); they would not even give Shi’a Da’wah
(invitation to Sunni Islam). source: http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2006_12_01_archive.html
Salafism is derived from the word salaf, which means “companion of the
prophet” and is a positive term for any Muslim… Salafist groups and
movements include the Wahhabis, the Deobandis and the missionary group
Jamaat al Tabligh. Wahhabis hold the prophet Muhammad’s life in Medina
as the gold standard for practicing Islam, particularly in terms of
ethics and morality. Wahhabism rejects all other influences on Islam
and attempts to “purify” the religion; it is generally seen as more
conservative than salafism. It rejects culture, history, philosophy,
Sufism, and all other Muslims that do not follow its path… Muslims who
are not Salafists perceive a “good Muslim” as one who follows a
doctrine of Wahhabism… Even though there are not a lot of salafists in
Europe, most of the religious texts in mosques are salafist. Salafists
have imposed upon the Muslim mind that this is the way… For example,
in traditional Islam the people of the Quran considered Jews and
Christians believers, while infidels were people who did not believe
in one god. Yet, today, if you ask even a tolerant Muslim who is
considered “an infidel”, he will answer “Jews and Christians.” source:
http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=15598
Philosophy of Wahhabism is nothing but the Islam in its original form
that continued until the rein of four caliphs… Wahhabism… dominates
most of the Muslim insurgencies… Many American academicians dealing
with the subject of Wahhabism do not have any clue what is going on in
the Islamic world these days… In America, almost all the mosques are
run by Wahhabite Imams, which receive constant infusion of petrodollar
from abroad and along with it they receive instruction what to say
during khutba on Sabbath day prayer… It is crystal clear that the
present-day Islam in most part of the world including USA reflects
pure Wahhabism. In short, there is only one face of Islam, which is
visible everywhere and that resembles the old-face of Islam or
Wahhabism. source: http://www.islam-watch.org/JamalHasan/Wahhabism-Original-Islam.htm
About 5% of Muslims are Sufis.
Sufism is not a sect, nor is it a heretical or schismatic movement; it
is an integral part of orthodox Islam. source: "Mystics and
Commisars" by Bennigsen and Wimbush, pp. 4,159,
http://www.americanthinker.com/2005/05/sufi_jihad.html
The oasis of Yathrib was first settled by three Jewish tribes: the
Banu Qaynuqa, the Banu Qurayza, and Banu Nadir… After Prophet
Muhammad's arrival, the city gradually came to be known as Medina.
This name was adopted from the Aramaic word Medinta, which the Jewish
inhabitants used for the city… The Jews eventually surrendered. Some
members of the Banu Aus now interceded on behalf of their old allies
and Prophet Muhammad agreed to the appointment of one of their chiefs,
Sa'd ibn Mua'dh, as judge. Sa'ad judged that all male members of the
tribe were killed and the women and children taken prisoner. That was
the end of the Jews of Medina. source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yathrib
Muslims wash their hands and face, rinse their mouths and, to finish,
wash their feet, starting with the right. Each body part is washed
three times before prayers begin. source:
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070922/LOCAL/709220487/-1/LOCAL17
No leader of a democratic nation was ever more popular than British
Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain - wildly cheered in the House of
Commons by opposition parties as well as his own - when he returned
from negotiations in Munich in 1938, waving an agreement and declaring
that it meant "peace in our time." Less than a year later, World War
II began in Europe and spread across the planet, killing tens of
millions of people and reducing many cities to rubble in Europe and
Asia. Looking back after that war, Winston Churchill said, "There was
never a war in all history easier to prevent by timely action."
source: http://www.nypost.com/seven/07272007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/americas_moral_paralysis_opedcolumnists_thomas_sowell.htm
"Fascism was the first and prime instance of a modern political
religion… This religion sacralized the state and assigned it the
primary educational task of transforming the mentality, the character,
and the customs of Italians. The aim was to create a 'new man,' a
believer in and an observing member of the cult of Fascism." - Emilio
Gentile
In Cologne, the children receiving meals from the Nazi state during
the Second World War had to pray before the meal, “Fold your hands,
bow your head and think about Adolf Hitler. He gives us our daily
bread and helps us out of every misery” (source: "National Socialism
as Religion" by Thomas Schirrmacher, http://www.contra-mundum.org/schirrmacher/NS_Religion.pdf)
The translators of Mein Kampf said, “Hitler attempted to make himself
the ‘prophet’ of the new German religion…. He believed that if a new
‘myth’ could be created and propagated as stubbornly, it would give
Germans a new faith which the masses would cherish as tenaciously as
they previously followed Christianity.” source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/SujitDas/Heil-Hitler-Heil-Muhammad.htm
Germany classes Scientology as a business, rather than a religious
organization, and has even gone so far as to ban Scientology. Belgium,
France, Ireland, Luxembourg, and the United Kingdom have not
recognized Scientology as a religion. Scientology has also not been
recognized as a religion in Israel or Mexico. A recent judicial
investigation in Belgium is now in the process of prosecuting
Scientology… One sociologist, Stephen A. Kent, has expressed the
following opinion: "I find it far more helpful to view it as a
transnational corporation, only one element of which is religious."
source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology#Controversy_and_criticism
If world history is to examine all cultures, non-Western civilizations
should be subject to the same standards of achievement and criticism,
codes of right and wrong, and ideals of social justice as the West.
But this is not the case, and the resulting double standard leads to
evasions and lies in lessons involving the Third World. Textbook
editors tread lightly on Islamic (and other non-Western) institutions
that would be vigorously condemned if they were practiced in the
Western world. source: http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1615
Paris is burning, yet again. The Muslim immigrant “youths” in the
banlieues have taken to the streets to expand a Western front in the
global jihad. This time, however, instead of just burning cars and
throwing rocks, this week they have taken up arms against French
police… The urban warfare we are seeing in Paris, as well as the
systematic violence by Muslim immigrants in other major cities
throughout Europe, are in accord with the strategic planning documents
drafted by the Muslim Brotherhood in recent decades in their hopes to
establish a global caliphate through jihad… This process of
confrontation also reflects a traditional Islamic view of constant
warfare, muqawama, interspersed with temporary truces, hudna, to
regroup for further conflict – a doctrine of warfare adopted by the
Muslim Brotherhood. source:
http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=20FFE708-EE41-4BC5-8852-DA5248EA086D
After a lifetime of indoctrination it was next to impossible to
renounce Islam completely so I decided to stick to Allah and Muhammad
and Imams without bothering to pray five times a day or fasting during
Ramadan. This coincided with my entering university ostensibly to
study English literature. In reality it turned out we were still on
the receiving end of another volley of Islamic indoctrination. Here
however the Mullahs were at a disadvantage. As I learned more of the
language I realised that concepts like humanity and morality have
totally different interpretations in the west. In Islam humans are
"slaves of Allah", they are allowed to use their intellect only if it
"hardens their belief in Islam." In the west freedom is cherished. In
Islam morality is handed down from primitive Arabs. In the west you
refer to your own conscience and use logical deduction in order to
differentiate between morality and immorality. In Islam love does not
exist. It's all lust. In the west love can be carried by a letter to
someone thousands of miles away. Victims of trauma and rape are beaten
and killed in Islam. These same people are offered therapy and support
in the West, their tormentors prosecuted. No one pretends that every
thing is perfect in the west. In Islam the iron rule works without a
hitch, it's perfect. source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/Emir/Leaving-Islam-When-truth-comes-in-Mullahs-jump-out-the-window.htm
Islam stresses the obligation (on Muslims) to emigrate from a land of
atheism or a land of aberration where beliefs or values are threatened
by adversaries - who may attempt to turn them into atheists or to make
them deviate or to go astray… The (religious) scholars ruled - and we
approve their ruling - that emigration is forbidden (haram) if it
involves going to any country in which (the person's) religion will
weaken… source: http://english.bayynat.org.lb/Issues/quran_concept.htm
Recently, in Kashmir, the Indian constitution and Indian law was
withdrawn and sharia law established as the law of the land. Muslims
typically claim they are victims while, at the same time victimizing
Indian non-Muslims with terrorist acts. Such claims by Indian Muslims
are similar to charges of apartheid against Israel for its erecting of
a security fence and checkpoints to prevent Islamic suicide bombers
from infiltrating the country. Muslims achieve political power by
attaining majority status demographically; demanding special
compensation, laws and conditions; and driving out non-Muslims. The
long-festering situation in India argues powerfully for the case that
no possibility of coexistence with Islam exists and containment is not
viable. Muslim conquest is scripturally driven and Islam's frontiers
have been extended by gradually overtaking the land of non-believers
and ethnically cleansing their territory. Unbeliever genocide has
gradually swept through Pakistan, Bangladesh and parts of India.
Muslim population growth is 1.5 times that of non-Muslims and physical
threats and political correctness conspire to further the Muslim
takeover. Little hope exists for the reformation of Islam in the same
way that religious reform is traditionally carried out: by religious
institutions accompanied with the lessening influence of clergy.
Currently, Islam is becoming more regressive, sharia courts and
Wahhabism are spreading, and no tradition of tolerance for other
religions has been established. No moderate or alternative versions of
the religion are being offered because such alternative mosques would
be threatened and would suffer from a lack of funding. The Islamic
focus on indoctrination, high population growth, fomenting of
insurgencies, and infiltration is part of the global jihad, a full-on
religious war against infidel nations and an attempted land conquest.
source: http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/01/the_other_jihad_islams_war_on.html
There is a military solution to terror:
http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB121244926833339577.html
There is evidence that slavery still continues beneath the surface in
some majority-Muslim countries as well—notably Saudi Arabia, which
only abolished slavery in 1962, Yemen and Oman, both of which ended
legal slavery in 1970, and Niger, which didn’t abolish slavery until
2004. In Niger, the ban is widely ignored, and as many as one million
people remain in bondage. Slaves are bred, often raped, and generally
treated like animals… Slavery is still practiced openly today in two
Muslim countries, Sudan and Mauritania. In line with historical
practice, Muslim slavers in the Sudan primarily enslave non-Muslims,
and chiefly Christians. source: http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/?p=962
"What has kept England on its feet during the past year [of Second
World war]? In part, no doubt, some vague idea about a better future,
but chiefly the atavistic emotion of patriotism, the ingrained feeling
of the English-speaking peoples that they are superior to foreigners.
For the last twenty years the main object of English left-wing
intellectuals has been to break this feeling down, and if they had
succeeded, we might be watching the S.S. men patrolling the London
streets at this moment. Similarly, why are the Russians fighting like
tigers against the German invasion? In part, perhaps, for some half-
remembered ideal of Utopian Socialism, but chiefly in defence of Holy
Russia (the ‘sacred soil of the Fatherland’, etc. etc.), which Stalin
has revived in an only slightly altered from. The energy that actually
shapes the world springs from emotions — racial pride, leader-worship,
religious belief, love of war — which liberal intellectuals
mechanically write off as anachronisms, and which they have usually
destroyed so completely in themselves as to have lost all power of
action." - George Orwell (source: http://www.orwell.ru/library/reviews/wells/english/e_whws)
Charlie Chaplin knew the great power of ridicule. A strong opponent of
racism, in 1937 Chaplin decided to make a film on the dangers of
fascism. As Chaplin pointed out in his autobiography, attempts were
made to stop the film being made: “Half-way through making The Great
Dictator I began receiving alarming messages from United Artists. They
had been advised by the Hays Office that I would run into censorship
trouble. Also the English office was very concerned about an anti-
Hitler picture and doubted whether it could be shown in Britain. But I
was determined to go ahead, for Hitler must be laughed at.” (Charles
Chaplin, My Autobiography- 1964)… Today Muslims become angry if you
ridicule their faith, but once they are free from this bondage of the
mind they will thank you for it. Ridicule Islam and ridicule those who
defend it. Put to shame the appeasers and the useful idiots even if
their name is Charles Windsor or Bill Clinton. Expose the stupidity of
Islam and laugh at its ignorant supporters. source:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/comics/introduction.htm
“In a very few years, perhaps in a very few months, we shall be
confronted with demands with which we shall no doubt be invited to
comply. Those demands may affect the surrender of territory or the
surrender of liberty. I foresee and foretell that the policy of
submission will carry with it restrictions upon the freedom of speech
and debate in Parliament, on public platforms, and discussions in the
press, for it will be said--indeed, I hear it said sometimes now -
that we cannot allow the Nazi system of dictatorship to be criticized
by ordinary, common English politicians. Then, with a press under
control, in part direct but more potently indirect, with every organ
of public opinion doped and chloroformed into acquiescence, we shall
be conducted along further stages of our journey.” - Winston Churchill
According to a Pew survey… more than two-thirds of Bangladeshis (81%),
Pakistanis (80%), Turks (68%), Palestinians (68%) and Indians (68%)
said they do not like American music, movies and television. source:
http://www.bloggernews.net/111522
Daniel Pipes talks the odds. The chance that immigrant Muslims and
indigenous Europeans find a way to live in harmony? Five percent, says
Pipes. The chance that Europe becomes Eurabian, part of the Muslim
world? Forty-seven-and-a-half percent. The chance that Europeans
reassert control over the continent? Forty-seven-and-a-half percent,
once more — and Pipes says it won’t be pretty. source:
http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonknowledge/post/?q=YTg3ZTAxYzQxZmIxZTcxN2NhMjNiYzI0NWM2NjMxYmY=
The Eastern faiths (Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Shintoism) make no
claims of exclusivity, i.e. that salvation can only be found in their
dogmas. The Western faiths (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), however,
do. Each proclaims itself the utter and infallible word of God and
seeks to subjugate the world to its will. source:
http://www.islam-watch.org/Tariq/Why-I-Am-Not-Muslim-Bold-Brilliant-Blasphemous.htm
Mars traverses an ellipse around the sun not because God has
instituted laws of motion that require Mars to traverse an ellipse,
but because Allah at every instant directs the angular velocity of
Mars… It is not surprising that Islamic science died out a generation
or two after al-Ghazali. It is a commonplace observation that Islam is
"fatalistic". Muslims typically conclude any statement about the
future, eg, "I'll see you at work tomorrow morning," with the
qualifier, "Insha'Allah", "God willing". Because God is everywhere and
in every action, acting without intermediate causes, the Judeo-
Christian concept of divine providence is inconceivable in Muslim
terms… The absolute transcendence of Allah in the physical world is
the cognate of his despotic character as a spiritual ruler, who
demands submission and service from his creatures. The Judeo-Christian
God loves his creatures and as an act of love makes them free.
Humankind only can be free if nature is rational, that is, if God
places self-appointed limits on his own sphere of action. In a world
ordered by natural law, humankind through its faculty of reason can
learn these laws and act freely. In the alternative case, the absolute
freedom of Allah crowds out all human freedom of action, leaving
nothing but the tyranny of caprice and fate. The empty and arbitrary
world of atheism is far closer to the Muslim universe than the
Biblical world, in which God orders the world out of love for
humankind, so that we may in freedom return the love that our creator
bears for us. Atheism is an alternative to Islam closer to Muslim
habits of mind than the love-centered world of Judaism and
Christianity. - " Spengler" source: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/IL04Aa02.html
Fitna is any form of protest of non-Muslims against Muslims. source:
http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1884
While many in the West continue to wrestle with whether radical
Islam’s hatred of the West is inspired by American foreign policy or
due to its support for the state of Israel, many radical Muslims see
the present jihad against the West as a continuation of a battle lost
on none other than September 11, 1683. That was the day Western forces
in Vienna defeated the army of the Islamic Ottoman Empire. source:
http://www.borderfirereport.net/alan-caruba/leaving-islam.html
The well-known Islamic sect Almutazella rejects the idea of the Quran
being a miracle. source: http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=278
The Muatazilites. Infuenced by the Greek-Byzantine thoughts and
philosophy, [1] Mutazilla "is a rational
school of theology in Islam. It was first connected with the names of
Wasil ibn Ata (d. 748) and Amr ibn
Ubayd (d. 761), who taught in the city of Basra, Iraq." source:
http://static.scribd.com/docs/cnqi46r1ajpn1.swf?INITIAL_VIEW=width
Young males are eager to gain dominant position in their society by
all means including violence. When human population explosion produces
too many young males, they restore natural balance by killing one
another. The side effects of the killings are wars and failed states.
Hungry males are less violent than well fed males. details:
http://www.sappho.dk/Nr.%206%20maj%202007/kontinent-english.html
The cheapest method of preventing the human population explosion is
quinacrine sterilization: http://www.quinacrine.com/
Six months ago, the Association for the Study of the Middle East and
Africa (Asmea) came into being. Now claiming 500 members and gearing
up to publish its own scholarly journal, Asmea is meant to be a
corrective to the 2,600-member Middle East Studies Association, the
premier professional society for scholars of the Middle East. That
organization is now regarded by many as stiflingly politicized.
Institutionally, it engages in nonstop Israel-bashing and seems to
blame America for every economic and geopolitical wrong on the planet.
source: http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1889
The original European fascists were sort of socialist-corporatist
reformers. Before WWII Adolf Hitler was a respectable European
politician. He made many good laws that are still the laws of Germany
and he engineered an "economic miracle." He always hated the Jews and
intended to deport them. The German fascists became genocidal Nazis
when (in 1936) Mufti of Jerusalem persuaded them that Jews and other
"enemies" should be killed rather than deported. Details:
http://israelvisit.co.il/cgi-bin/friendly.pl?url=Apr-15-07!remember
____________________________
simple.lan...@gmail.com
Isolation from Society:
This doesn’t necessarily mean that one has to be living on a compound
with all other sect members and waiting for the end of the world.
However, one of the defining marks of a cult is to control the
surroundings of the members. This makes it easier to control their
minds. They are constantly warned of the dangers of being away from
the other sect members at all possible times. They absolutely cannot
be friends with or have contact with a person outside of the sect
unless they are recruiting that person into the sect and are endlessly
told of the dangers of doing such a thing. They are warned of the
dangers of getting a secular education (lest they be corrupted) told
to avoid critical thinking, and to embrace groupthink. Any books,
lectures, etc outside of those specifically approved by the movement
leadership must be avoided at all costs. This way, information can be
spoon fed to the members very carefully.
Absolutism/Literalism:
The world is presented in stark black and white terms and there are no
shades of gray. There is no compromise. Members are made to feel
guilty for doing things that any other normal human being would do,
such as mixing with people that are not in their cult. So the constant
goal becomes to spend as much time around other members as possible.
Even if one has to quit a job to do so. Everyone in the sect is good.
Everyone else is evil. There is no in-between. Complex issues are made
into very simple ones. Because they have been trained to see only in
black and white, members of cults are very hard to reason with since
they have trouble understanding complex real life issues…
Loaded Language:
The use of thought-terminating cliches, catch phrases or words that
are designed to end a conversation or controversy. Some of the more
popular ones where Muslims are concerned are “Khalifah”, “the ulamaa”,
“the haqq”, “Islam is the answer”, “Qur’an and Sunnah” etc. Phrases
that when invoked can’t be questioned. It is sad sometimes because
even ayat and hadith have been misused in this manner. People in cults
speak almost entirely in these kind of cliches…
Exaggerated Claims:
Cults tend to engage in religious hairsplitting. There is no room for
disagreement even on small issues where none is necessarily wrong.
Typically small issues are lifted into sacredness and can not be
called into question. Also an exaggerated reverence for the leadership
is demanded. This makes name droppers raise in status within the cult…
Denial of Problems:
Because they associate perfection with their cult, there cannot
possibly be any mistakes or bad advice given, so they deny and/or bury
the problems at all costs…
Where we in the West understand the idea of a basics ceasefire, in
Islamic culture – in jihadi culture – there are two variants: tahadiya
and houdna. A tahadiya is roughly defined as a temporary cessation of
violence that can be ended at any time for any reason. To employ
tahadiya is to employ a tactic that allows for a brief “lull” in
fighting for a number of reasons: to rearm, to fortify, as a military
tactic or to acquire greater troop strength or a better vantage
point... The pensive peace of tahadiya stands in contrast to the more
stable cessation of violence achieved in a houdna.
____________________________
STOCKHOLM SYNDROME (source: http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=840#more-840)
Given the right conditions, abductors are able to exert an astonishing
amount of influence over their victims - to the point at which the
captive has full loyalty to his or her captor while believing that
this was his or her own choice. It is a cognitive phenomenon related
to brainwashing and known as Stockholm syndrome. The condition was
named for a 1973 kidnapping case in Stockholm, Sweden, in which four
bank employees held hostage for six days ended up siding with their
abductors and even trying to fight being rescued… These effects are
not limited to kidnapping situations, either. Stockholm syndrome
likely has links to other situations in which oppression leads to
loyalty: abusive relationships (including those between adults and
children), prisoners of war, and cult members. It is also important to
note that such reactions to abuse under extreme conditions are a
natural reflex. Modern police officers have become so familiar with
Stockholm syndrome that it is often expected when dealing with a long-
term hostage case… Rather than being an indication of any weakness
whatsoever on the part of the victim, Stockholm syndrome turns out to
be an instinctive and often effective strategy for survival.
____________________________
We will never surrender to Islam. We will fight on the beaches, we
will fight on the landing grounds, we will fight in the fields and in
the streets, we will fight in the hills; we will never surrender.
Ördög
*** DO NOT FEED THE POLISH TROLL ***
Simple is a self declared Zionist extremist troll.
This ex-Solidarnosc shit stirrer moron, who is now back in his old
country while still working for undisclosed foreign powers, cuts and
pastes
extremist propaganda spam from very dubious and compromised sources.
He trolls currently in 136 newsgroups.
Since July 2008 he has posted over 2660 propaganda hate messages.
His average Google score (currently over 4910 ratings) has remained
"one star" (extremely poor quality).
Simple generally disregard good nettiquette by persistent spamming
newsgroups
where members have already voiced discontent about his activities.
As a rule he intentionally ignores published FAQs governing
the nature of posted material which should be regarded as off topic in
a given NG.
.....
His propaganda focuses on:
1)
Denial of the failure of the joint US & Israeli
neoconservative / Zionist extremist world politics
2)
Denial of the responsibility of the US for the increasing crisis in
several geopolitical hot spots world wide.
3)
Denial of the effect of right wing extremist conservative ideologies
for
the present sorry state of the planet.
4)
Denial of the responsibility of the capitalist economic system for the
same.
5)
Denial of the fact that fanaticism, mass psychosis, and the
sustainance of
archaic/anachronistic cultural, social and political practices ARE
inherent to ALL currently practiced religions on the planet not just
that particular
one he singles out for blame in support of his political agenda.
6)
Dredging the sewers of society to find incidental incriminating
material in
hope to focus negative attention on a targeted group of people.
(I.e. creating a negative stereotype just like the Nazis did
in case of the Gypsies, Jews and political leftists before
the start of the Second World War)
7)
Writing off as inconsequential criminal activity committed by
individuals
NOT belonging to the singled out cultural, religious and political
groups.
-----
Ördög
(The friendly Hungarian Devil in service of aus.politics and Usenet)
Ördög
Ariadne
simple.lan...@gmail.com
take to help defeat Jihadists" thread.(http://groups.google.com/group/
alt.politics.immigration/browse_thread/thread/7830d860ef332502/
a498f559f6111f6c#a498f559f6111f6c) These posts did not hurt anyone
except Ördög.