The Open-Borders Conspiracy
Baster
Xeno Chauvin
"Baster" <burr...@zoidberg.net> wrote in message
news:10r5ju46l1noenrso...@4ax.com...
>
> http://www.frontpagemag.com./Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=1880
>
> I thought this was very interesting...
I guess IF raising the old Communist boogie man will acquire additional
participants
to realize our immigration problem then what the hell.
For me, having lived through the "Communist conspiracy" I can
see we have a greater problem in uncontrolled immigration than
we EVER had from Soviet Communism.
I was NEVER forced , during the Communist conspiracy
to choose English or Russian
when I called the electric company.
Xeno
Baster
I was there for some of the commie menace years too. I don't think
it's really about "communists" (who cares), but about authoritarian
leftists, who in this country are also the core anti-white racists. I
think you can compare them closely to Stalinists. Maybe another
comparison in the N. Vietnamese leadership, who used communism to
motivate a civil war against colonialism. Now they care less about
communism than the Chinese do, it served its purpose.
Norm³©®
By Robert Locke
FrontPageMagazine.com | July 15, 2002
If I could choose to have my readers learn one and only one thing from what
I write, it would be that America's problems are not the result of blind,
much less inevitable, forces, but are the consequences of deliberate
political action by motivated individuals and groups. Nowhere is this
clearer than in the case of our ongoing immigration crisis. Let's trace the
lines of influence in the open-borders conspiracy, a word I use despite its
connotations of grassy knollology because in this case it is factually
appropriate. Given who has been pushing mass immigration in America and how
open they have been about why they are doing it, it boggles my mind that
anyone who considers himself conservative can still support this policy.
Starting with the hardest Left, there is the radically pro-immigration
position of the Communist Party of the United States. Don't discount their
significance because of their tiny membership and marginalized position in
mainstream political discourse; their positions are indicative of the
consensus of the most radical and determined core of the Left. This is true
because much of the Left's fundamental thinking is done by avowed communists
and their splinter groups, and because these groups have all sorts of ties
through shared personnel with mainstream organizations. This radical core
authenticates its positions as the extreme leftist view, at which point it
is picked up on by more moderate leftists and endorsed in kind but with a
difference of degree. The CPUSA supports immigration because it believes
that this will enable it to solve the fundamental problem it faces in
America: a materially contented working class. As put in William Hawkins's
excellent 1994 book on the open-borders conspiracy, Importing Revolution,
The solution? Increase immigration, especially that of undocumented, illegal
workers. The Communist Party, USA, in its publication, Political Affairs:
Theoretical Journal of the Communist Party USA, understands well the
cause-effect relationship of this: "undocumented workers in any work... have
the effect of depressing wages and lowering the quality of working
conditions." In other words, CPUSA and its fellow travelers suggest that, in
order to "save" workers, the working class must first be destroyed through
declining wages and living standards!"
This is the first prong of the Communist assault: worsen conditions for
American workers.
The second Communist prong is to use immigration to increase the numbers of
racial minorities, whom they believe can be relied upon to be disloyal to
the existing regime. As the Marxist theoretician Mike Davis puts it in his
book Prisoners of the American Dream,
The real weak link in American imperialism is a black and Hispanic working
class, fifty million strong. This is a nation within a nation, a society
within a society, that alone possesses the numerical and positional strength
to undermine the American empire from within."
One of the ironies of the significance of communists in the immigration
debate is that the origin of American communism itself lies in immigration.
As Nathan Glazer reports in his study of the movement's formative years,
"the most striking characteristic of Communist Party membership throughout
the 1920's was that it was overwhelmingly composed of recent immigrants.
Probably only one in ten of the members was a native American." (The Social
Basis of American Communism) These immigrants came to this country in the
great wave from 1890 to WWI, and therefore the New Left, which two
generations later grew out of the intellectual and social milieu these
communists created, is yet another baleful indirect consequence of
immigration. Now let's move (a little) towards the center and look at the
ideas of the National Lawyers Guild, which is not openly communist but is a
front organization for communists. One of their leaders once said, speaking
of immigration, that, "[T]o adopt a liberal policy would provide the basis
for thousands of non-white, often left-leaning and politically conscious
individuals to remain lawfully in the United States." He was speaking
specifically about one provision of law, so his numbers were a bit off; we
are currently taking in nearly a million a year. Notice the way that
left-wing politics is linked to race: there is a pervasive anti-white bias
running through all these people. The NLG worked on a number of individual
and collective legal cases for immigrants, but its most pervasive influence
has been in its ability to insinuate its staff into other organizations. For
example, one Amy Novick, a member of its National Immigration Project, its
principal tool for promoting open borders, became the assistant director of
the American Immigration Lawyers Association. (Its extremism has been so
offensive that even liberals like Robert F. Kennedy and Americans for
Democratic Action have denounced it). It helped found the National
Immigration Forum in 1981.
Again moving a little to the center, next comes the Ford Foundation, an
organization that has contributed to the problem of immigration in a number
of ways. Following is an incomplete list of organizations the Ford
Foundation has funded that promote immigration. My point in subjecting the
reader to this mind-numbing list is to make the point of just how busy Ford
has been in pushing this agenda, and how innocuous-sounding are so many of
the organizations they use to do it. Ford often uses organizations that have
some legitimate aspects to them to provide cover, giving funds to finance a
specific pro-immigration program within the organization. To wit:
Arizona Farmworkers Union, African-American Institute, American Bar
Association Fund for Justice and Education, American Civil Liberties
Foundation, American Council for Nationalities Service, American Friends
Service Committee, American Immigration Law Foundation, American Public
Welfare Association, Asian-Pacific American Legal Center of Southern
California, Bilateral Commission on U.S.-Mexican Relations, California Rural
Legal Assistance Foundation, Casa de Proyecto Libertad, Center for
Constitutional Rights, Center for Economic and Social Studies of the Third
World, Center for Migration Studies of New York, Center for Southeast Asian
Refugee Resettlement, Center for Teaching and Research in Economics, Central
America Resource Center, Centro Presente, Chinatown Resources Development
Center, Christian Community Service Agency, Clinica Monsignor Oscar A.
Romero, Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights and Services, Farmworker
Justice Fund, Haitian Centers Council, Haitian Refugee Center, Haitian Task
Force, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, Indochina Resource Action Center,
Institute for Regional Education, International Refugee Center of Oregon,
Inter-University Program on Latino Research, Intertect Institute, Lawyers
Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Lawyers Committee for International
Human Rights, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles, Lutheran Council in the
USA, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, Mexican-American Legal
Defense and Educational Fund, Migrant Legal Action Program, Multicultural
Education Training and Advocacy Center, National Association for the
Southern Poor, National Bureau of Economic Research, National Chicano
Council on Higher Education, National Coalition of Advocates for Students,
National Coalition of Haitian Refugees, National Council of La Raza,
National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, National
Immigration, Refugee and Citizenship Forum, New York Association on New
Americans, Policy Sciences Center, Population Council, Population Reference
Center, Potomac Institute, Refugee Policy Group, Salvadoran Humanitarian
Aid, Research and Education Foundation, Social Science Research Council,
Southeast Asian Mutual Assistance Associations Coalition, Texas Legal
Services, Travelers and Immigrants Aid Society of Metropolitan Chicago.
The point is that all these organizations are not just pro-mass immigration
by nature; they are specifically paid - bribed - to be so by massive
handouts of Ford Foundation money. Other left-wing foundations - and most
foundations are left-wing - have behaved similarly.
When bribing existing organizations hasn't been enough, the baleful Ford
Foundation has established entire groups from scratch to promote its mass
immigration agenda. Case in point is the Mexican-American Legal Defense and
Education Fund, which is almost an entirely artificial creation. Only 2% of
its budget comes from grass-roots donations. MALDEF has lobbied for:
Higher quotas of legal immigration to the US.
Non-prosecution or deportment of illegal aliens.
Non-guarding of our border with Mexico.
Amnesty for illegal aliens.
The right of illegal aliens to welfare and other public services in America.
Bilingual education (which is known to fail).
The right of illegal aliens to vote in American elections.
Hate crimes laws against free speech.
Continuing with the Mexican theme, another major player in the open-borders
movement has been the government of Mexico, which openly proclaims (only to
its own people, of course) its intention of reconquering the parts of the
Southwestern United States that were conquered from them in 1845. It has
done a number of things:
It financed the notorious Supreme Court case Plyler vs. Doe, which
established a "right" for the children of illegal immigrants to attend
school.
It has a deliberate policy, called acercamiento, (reconciliation or bonding)
of attempting to use Mexican-Americans as a voting bloc to advance its
political interests, principally in increasing immigration, opening America
to Mexican trade, and dealing with Mexico's foreign debt.
Basically, the Mexican government adopts one, very smooth, tone when
speaking to its patsies in America, and another, very militant, tone when
speaking to its own people about its ruthlessness in pursuing its own
national interest at the expense of ours. As long as political correctness
makes people cowards about blowing the whistle on this scam, and as long as
the Mexican government continues to bribe the American corporate elite with
a supply of docile cheap labor, we may expect this to continue. The other
problem with the immigration debate in this country is that nominally
moderate groups have been perverted by the influence of highly-motivated
extremists. For example, the Marxist National Lawyers Guild has been able to
infiltrate its people into the American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILG has about 2,000 members, but is dominated by the 100 or so members who
are also members of NLG.
There have been other communist front organizations active on the
immigration issue, like the American Committee for the Protection of the
Foreign Born. Then come the Marxist-influenced organizations like the
Lawyers Committee for International Human Rights. There is also the Center
for Constitutional Rights is a group organized by William Kunstler and
Arthur Kinoy. Kunstler (recently deceased) was a well-known extremist
lawyer; Kinoy was a Trotskyite attorney who was twice president of the
National Lawyers Guild and worked with the American Committee for Protection
of the Foreign Born. All these groups, which have appeared, split, and
mutated over the years, have worked to undermine the immigration-control
laws and increase the number of immigrants
The American Civil Liberties Union, as one might have known, has been busy
over the years working mischief on the immigration issue. Its basic strategy
has been to use extreme "civil liberties" claims to hamstring enforcement of
the immigration control laws. In addition, it has an Immigration Task Force
with a list of 40 issues to litigate, including:
Weakening employer sanctions for employing illegal aliens.
Making it impossible for the Immigration and Naturalization Service to
conduct inspections without a search warrant.
Allowing "political" and "religious" refusals to present proof of
citizenship.
Requiring the INS to provide free legal counsel to illegal aliens.
Requiring the INS to release illegal aliens who contest their deportation.
Preventing the denial of welfare to illegal aliens.
Expanding anti-discrimination law to require employers to hire illegal
aliens.
The ACLU also actively works with MALDEF to encourage immigrants to file
allegations of discrimination. Mexican ethnic organizations are not the only
ones behind the push for more immigration. Surprisingly, given that
substantial Jewish immigration to this country ended two generations ago, so
are Jews. One major force behind the disastrous 1965 Immigration "Reform"
Act that caused the current crisis was organized Jewry. According to J.J.
Goldberg's approving book Jewish Power,
Everyone agreed that the Jewish community must undertake a massive effort to
repeal the quota system, but the ADL and the American Jewish Committee
refused to join an operation under NCRAC auspices. Instead, Minkoff put
NCRAC immigration specialist Jules Cohen in charge of a "non-auspices
committee," operated by NCRAC under its "non-auspices." In 1955, this
committee spearheaded the formation of a broad coalition for immigration
reform, made up of civic associations, labor groups, and Protestant and
Catholic groups. For a decade the coalition lobbied, leafleted, planted
articles in magazines, and held public meetings on the racist nature of the
immigration quota system. The entire operation was run by a steering
committee of the "non-auspices committee," made up of four staffers from the
three defense agencies and NCRAC. The quotas were finally repealed by the
Immigration Reform Act of 1965, passed by Congress during the civil rights
surge of President Lyndon Johnson's early years. (p.127)
Thus the gates were opened to the Moslem immigrants who today chant "Death
to Israel" on the streets of Brooklyn, New York and Dearborn, Michigan. It
is only fair to remark that some of the most courageous opponents of mass
immigration, like Dan Stein, head of the Federation for American Immigration
Reform, the major group working on the issue, are Jewish.
Now we come to the saddest dupes of the immigration debate: what Lenin
called the "useful idiots" of the Right. These are basically a combination
of extreme libertarians (like the Cato Institute) who support immigration on
ideological grounds and hired guns who promote it on behalf of interested
economic constituencies like the cheap-labor lobby, which is composed of
agribusiness and other employers of immigrant labor. (Naturally, there exist
some genuinely intelligent libertarians like Nobel laureate and former
Chicago economics professor Milton Friedman, who has said, "it is obvious
you can't have open immigration and a welfare state." Of course it is.) It
is time for these people to wise up and realize that they are pawns of a
far-left agenda. Immigrants who come to this country only fatten the voting
blocs of the Left which oppose the economic agenda of libertarians, anyway,
so these people are just shooting themselves in the foot.
Note: I have started writing a blog every business day at
http://www.robertlocke.com.
Norm³©®
"Baster" <burr...@zoidberg.net> wrote in message
news:10r5ju46l1noenrso...@4ax.com...
>
stvfrmco
"Xeno Chauvin" <arful...@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:PKDY8.107549$eF5.3...@twister.austin.rr.com...
When the Soviet Union collapsed there was a period of time when nobody was
in control of the nuclear weapons -- you may recall, for example, that the
MIR cosmonauts were left in space for over a year and were eventually
rescued by the Americans. U.S. Special Forces took the nuclear warheads
out of Kazakstan along with some of the other former Soviet Republics to
prevent them from ending up in Iran or Libya or North Korea or blah, blah,
blah. Russian Mafia groups forged ties with Colombian drug lords about the
same time the Russians rather abruptly pulled out of Cuba. The same sort of
sloppy, lack of control that surrounded the nuclear weapons in the Russian
"Stans" happened in Cuba. During that time Colombian and Mexican drug lords
had a window of opportunity to gain SAMs and nuclear weapons along with
delivery vehicles. One might ask -- is our foreign policy with regard to
the Mexican border being dictated by nuclear blackmail from Mexico?
Certainly Russia's border with China is as permeable as ours is with our
neighbors.
Mike Rhino
the Ford Foundation was taken over by weird people. What sort of person
majors in charity in college. Maybe they're a weird group of people.
"NormłŠŽ" <stor...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:z7GY8.74873$JU3.27...@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com...
Nicolas Garcia
man oh man!!!
you are willing to come up with ANYTHING to discredit Mexico, aren't
you???
what's next????? That Mexico Officials are infecting people with TB or
other deseases, and then sending them across the border in an effort to
get all americans infected???
why all this fearmonging???? what good comes out of trying to scare
people into thinking all these LIES????? do you have ANY PROOF of the
things you come up with?????
I laugh at most of what you write, mister, that's about all you acomplish
here.
Xeno Chauvin
"Norm³©®" <stor...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:z7GY8.74873$JU3.27...@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com...
> Thge Ford Foundation part makes me the sickest. They need to be stopped.
Isn't it ironic that the FORD foundation is doing this?
Back in "Henrys" time the Ford Company,while hiring immigrunts, had a policy
to
"Americanize" it's workers by teaching them English and even having cooking
classes for the wives so they could "cook" American.
So I guess FORD learned a lesson.....when you "Americanize" an immigrunt
worker
and he KNOWS how to speak English, then, the Union boss can talk to him too.
Xeno
Toolly
> man oh man!!!
>
> you are willing to come up with ANYTHING to discredit Mexico, aren't
> you???
>
> what's next????? That Mexico Officials are infecting people with TB or
> other deseases, and then sending them across the border in an effort to
> get all americans infected???
>
> why all this fearmonging???? what good comes out of trying to scare
> people into thinking all these LIES????? do you have ANY PROOF of the
> things you come up with?????
>
> I laugh at most of what you write, mister, that's about all you acomplish
> here.
NO, you are quite wrong N.Garcia. Both Baster and stvfr. offer articulate
and provocative insights here. What we all see here who are against this
rampant 'immigration' is that our way of life IS being overrrun. We want to
understand why this is being allowed...and all the possibilities for what
should be 'outrage' in the 'traditional' American population...but isn't [or
has been far too silent to date]. Are there political conspiracies at hand?
Is this by design? We know the USSR was active in 'infiltration' from
within for a lot years...as much of their manifesto states. Perhaps their
programs started at grass roots levels to 'change' the mindsets of people
who would make up our institutions some day [read the website Baster has
posted about open border conspiracy...quite interesting indeed; black and
hispanic populations do not belong here in numbers...so why are they being
promoted now to rise to the extent they are; to challenge for the land
itself in time]. Once such 'inside' covert organization was in place, the
fall of the USSR as a nation may not have dissolved the ultimate 'influence'
of such grass root infiltrations.
Communism and socialist thinking are closely related you know...coming from
liberal idealism that thinks government can promote 'utopian' societies (of
course, we now know only leads to totalitarianism and economic bankruptcy).
We know liberal demogogues in the Democratic party have worked to open our
borders to disparate immigration for the sake of greater political base.
But how far to the left does this 'root' go? And how far back in time is
the influence by which this mindset is mustered?
YOu ask for 'proof'. Can you give us reason why our land has been given
away like it has? Something is happening here...beyond belief really; jaw
dropping amazement kind of policy coming out of Washington where our entire
heritage is being sold down the river. Again, why is this happening? Why
is there no outrage? How have our very institutions changed so drastically
to now work to deconstruct our own culture? It is crazy really.
Instead of thinking 'communism' or even 'socialism'...how about
'mindset'...a particular aura of character by which those influenced would
be 'primed' toward supporting changes in policy that would undermine the
true America. The movie 'Reds' stood out to me to show what I mean. The
movie showcased intellectual Social zealots activated to force social policy
over the entire culture...who were 'idiots' for the most part; drunk with
their 'intellectualism' that was more hubris and 'mirage' rather than
anything 'real'. Across the seas, that became social revolution to become
'communism'; here in this country, that same 'essential' mindset now perhaps
becomes this 'illegal' immigration and social policy under civil rights [the
whole liberal political correctness thingy]. Elite intellectuals drunk upon
their intellect...thinking they can 'think' for the rest of us [blind to
what influences them from the past]. That pretty much sounds like what has
'allowed' this land to be overrun as I have heard it described. The
'embers' of communist manifesto from bygone years?...rising now to give
flame to a similar fire in our own land [but under different labels?]. Hard
to say...but I want to hear all angles. I want to understand who the
villains are so we can go after them...and somehow get this boat turned back
around pointed in the RIGHT direction [the one where human existence
prospers rather than degenerates].
As far as Mexico...I don't think AMERICANS have anything against
Mexicans...as long as they stay in Mexico where they belong; visit on
vacation only. Everyone knows deep in their hearts this is all wrong
today...all this 'migration' against America.
Lets Roll
"stvfrmco" <stvf...@email.msn.com> wrote in message
news:eMhPh1ELCHA.924@cpimsnntpa03...
Lets Roll
"Nicolas Garcia" <nico...@skat.usc.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.GSO.4.33.020716...@skat.usc.edu...
juvenile attacks with Samoa, contain no substance, and only an occasional
breather to ridicule anything that might be less than virginal about
mexicans. You are just a slimy little racist troll.
Nicolas Garcia
RACIST!!!!
Lets Roll
anything negative is mentioned about mexicans.
Baster
<nico...@skat.usc.edu> wrote:
>
> RACIST!!!!
Ouch!
(Better spray some Bactine on that! )
<psssssst>