Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Iowans Overwhelmingly Support Traditional Marriage

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Roger

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 1:21:13 AM1/7/10
to

Iowans Rally for Marriage

Family advocates will hold a rally at the Iowa state capitol for "Two
days for Marriage" on Jan. 12-13 in support of a marriage protection
amendment, a day after the Legislature goes back into session.

The event is being coordinated by "Let Us Vote Iowa" and the Iowa
Family Policy Council (IFPC).

Tom Steen, chief operating officer for the IFPC, said the rally will
come after the governor's state of the state address.

"We are going to take the leaders of the various community groups that
will be there to meet House leaders and Senate leaders," he said. "They
are going to be delivering petitions that have been building and
gathering over the state for the last four or five months."

Last April, the Iowa Supreme Court struck down the state's defense of
marriage act � ushering in gay "marriage." Steen said the numbers show
that Iowa is ripe for a constitutional marriage amendment.

"We don't feel that the 70 percent of Iowans who want that are being
fairly represented in the Legislature," he said.

For more information on the Two Days for Marriage Rally, go to
luviowa.org.

http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000011786.cfm


Anlatt the Builder

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 3:17:00 AM1/7/10
to
I support "traditional" (male/female) marriage too.

And same-sex marriage.

There's no conflict between the two. One does not preclude the other.
They're not at war - except in the fantasies of the anti-gay
contingent.

Diogenes

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 6:18:27 AM1/7/10
to

"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:7876e4e3-6dfc-49b9...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

>I support "traditional" (male/female) marriage too.
>
> And same-sex marriage.
===
Since you are a queer, you would obviously support homo marriages.

Craig the Queer

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 9:11:36 AM1/7/10
to
Roger wrote:
>
> Iowans Rally for Marriage

> Last April, the Iowa Supreme Court struck down the state's defense of

> marriage act � ushering in gay "marriage." Steen said the numbers show


> that Iowa is ripe for a constitutional marriage amendment.
>
> "We don't feel that the 70 percent of Iowans who want that are being
> fairly represented in the Legislature," he said.
>
> For more information on the Two Days for Marriage Rally, go to
> luviowa.org.

>==============
No wonder Craig the Queer has been so quiet lately.
He doesn't have time to rant and rave when his all-important homo
marriage law is in danger. He is too busy registering to vote under
hundreds of assumed names.

LC

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 9:49:10 AM1/7/10
to

"Roger" <Roger@.> wrote in message news:t3f1n.2514$ap2...@newsfe18.iad...

> Iowans Rally for Marriage

You forgot to add <alt.fan.iowa> to your troll, "J".

juanjo

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 2:12:57 PM1/7/10
to
On Jan 6, 10:21 pm, "Roger" <Roger@.> wrote:
> Iowans Rally for Marriage
>
> Family advocates will hold a rally at the Iowa state capitol for "Two
> days for Marriage" on Jan. 12-13 in support of a marriage protection
> amendment, a day after the Legislature goes back into session.
>

From the Des Moines Register newspaper:

Iowans are almost evenly divided about whether they would vote for or
against a constitutional amendment to end marriage for same-sex
couples, according to The Des Moines Register's new Iowa Poll.

Forty-one percent say they would vote for a ban, and 40 percent say
they would vote to continue gay marriage. The rest either would not
vote or say they are not sure.

The overwhelming majority of Iowans - 92 percent - say gay marriage
has brought no real change to their lives.

Now of interest is the fact that in this poll the vast majority of the
Iowans polled said they were far more concerned with the economy than
with who married whom. This included Republicans [65%], Democrats
{90%] and Independents {93%].

John Jacob Petry, Child Molester

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 3:09:34 PM1/7/10
to mail...@reece.net.au, mail...@bananasplit.info, mail...@m2n.gabrix.ath.cx
In article <b3c67bf8-c3f2-4b15-93ba-
e4aeea...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>

juanjo <jonp...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 10:21�pm, "Roger" <Roger@.> wrote:
> > Iowans Rally for Marriage
> >
> > Family advocates will hold a rally at the Iowa state capitol for "Two
> > days for Marriage" on Jan. 12-13 in support of a marriage protection
> > amendment, a day after the Legislature goes back into session.
> >
>
> From the Des Moines Register newspaper:
>
> Iowans are almost evenly divided about whether they would vote for or
> against a constitutional amendment to end marriage for same-sex
> couples,

Iowa is not represented by Des Moines. The Register is a left
leaning dick sucker supporting communist democrat supporting rag.

juanjo

unread,
Jan 16, 2010, 4:40:30 PM1/16/10
to
On Jan 7, 12:09 pm, "John Jacob Petry, Child Molester"
<childmoles...@sanfagcisco.ca> wrote:
> In article <b3c67bf8-c3f2-4b15-93ba-
> e4aeea041...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>

>
> juanjo <jonpe...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 6, 10:21 pm, "Roger" <Roger@.> wrote:
> > > Iowans Rally for Marriage
>
> > > Family advocates will hold a rally at the Iowa state capitol for "Two
> > > days for Marriage" on Jan. 12-13 in support of a marriage protection
> > > amendment, a day after the Legislature goes back into session.
>
> > From the Des Moines Register newspaper:
>
> > Iowans are almost evenly divided about whether they would vote for or
> > against a constitutional amendment to end marriage for same-sex
> > couples,
>
> Iowa is not represented by Des Moines.  The Register is a left
> leaning dick sucker supporting communist democrat supporting rag.

Here we have another anonymous coward who posts under another person's
name. Too bad he has no balls as well as no brain.

0 new messages