...Or, in the immortal words of Charles Montgomery Burns,
himself a noted Republican:
"I prefer the hands-on touch you only get with hired goons."
zino
"J.Q.P." <j...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3A1F52CD...@hotmail.com...
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
> And you don't think that anyone is outraged enough by what is going on to
> go to a protest on their own volition?
Of course they are--they've been listening to lying talk-radio
rabble-rousers and the rabbel is getting roused.
But in THIS CASE the violent mob was bought and paid for by the
Republican Party. Remember you read it here, cause you'll doubtless
see very little of it on the fascist media--they're too busy scrambling
to Bob Dole photo-ops for the non-issue of military ballots, which the
Democrats have accepted for PR purposes.
> You disapprove of Republican's questionong Democratic (Ha!) tactics,
> but you approve of Jesse Jackson and hie rent-a-mob? How liberal of
> you.
The problem with this logic is that Jackson's is not a violent mob and
it is not rented. But the Republican rent-a-mob is BOTH. That's the
entire problem with it.
Do you only read the headlines in the Limbaugh Newsletter?
--
The storm starts when the drops start dropping. When the drops stop dropping
the storm starts stopping.
Typical democratic spin. Now a canvassing board is so sensitive that they
cancel a recount out of fear of their lives because of a republican
sponsored protest. Oh, those horrible 1st ammendment practicing republicans
beating hte democrats at their own game.
Listen, I have news for you, Republicans are all done being nice while the
liberals rant and rave their nonsense on the airwaves 24x7. What you are
witnessing is conservative America reaching the point where we are not
willing to take it any mroe and fighting back. You can whine about it all
you want, but there isn't anything you can do about it. Unless you would
support a repeal of the 1st ammendment along with the 2nd.
--
Dave A
"Elisabeth Riba" <l...@osmond-riba.org> wrote in message
news:8vps97$seg$1...@news.panix.com...
> In alt.politics.elections zino <Dr Scholls.com> wrote:
> > And you don't think that anyone is outraged enough by what is going on
to
> > go to a protest on their own volition? You disapprove of Republican's
> > questionong Democratic (Ha!) tactics, but you approve of Jesse Jackson
and
> > hie rent-a-mob? How liberal of you.
>
>
> Quoting http://www.j-marshall.com/talk/
>
> If the Bushies don't grasp the distinction between a political rally and
> menacing behavior, even more worried about a Bush presidency than he was
> before.
> The Jackson-Wexler-NAACP protest could arguably be called
> inflammatory. But it was a public demonstration, in a public place, in
> support of a particular political cause. In this case, a recount in Palm
> Beach county. (As it happens the rally was broken up by Bush-Cheney
> counter demonstrators.) Who was intimidated or threatened by this
> demonstration?
> The Miami-Dade incident was a bit different. Under the guise of being
> 'observers,' an organized group of Republican operatives entered the
> county government building where the recount was taking place. They then
> attempted to prevent a legally sanctioned vote recount by chanting,
> banging on the doors of the recount area and demanding entry, chasing
> people around, and man-handling their opponents - all with the specific
> intent of disrupting an effort which the state Supreme Court had
> sanctioned the day before. Don't believe my description? See conservative
> columnist Paul Gigot's substantively identical take. He was there.
>
> --
> ----------> Elisabeth Anne Riba * l...@osmond-riba.org <----------
> "[She] is one of the secret masters of the world: a librarian.
> They control information. Don't ever piss one off."
> - Spider Robinson, "Callahan
Touch"
Jessie 0
Decatur School Board 5
Roger
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 19:14:33 GMT, Nazodesu <22...@home.com.nospam>
wrote:
--
-----------------
Al "Chad" Gore Cheated
by having the hand counts
Do you want a 'leader'
like that ? Not me !
"Dave A" <dave_an...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:t20vfjp...@corp.supernews.com...
"A manual recount shall be conducted in preference
to an electronic recount"
TEXAN HOUSE BILL 331 SIGNED INTO LAW
BY GOVERNOR GEORGE BUSH-1997
DOES ANYONE SEE THE HYPOCRISY???
--
John
-----
Ranetek wrote:
> You Repub dumbasses just get hysterical when you see more than three
> brothers together. Your so intolerant and frightened of blacks that you
> think a peaceful demonstration is a riot. Get fucked........
> "zino" <Dr Scholls.com> wrote in message
> news:3a1fc...@news.newsfeeds.com...
> > And you don't think that anyone is outraged enough by what is going on to
> > go to a protest on their own volition? You disapprove of Republican's
> > questionong Democratic (Ha!) tactics, but you approve of Jesse Jackson and
> > hie rent-a-mob? How liberal of you.
> >
> > zino
> > "J.Q.P." <j...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:3A1F52CD...@hotmail.com...
> I've already heard from those who were there and they are all saying the
> accusations are a bunch of crap. I also was there, via live television
> watching the three board members unanimously agree to stop the recounts due
> to lack of time and in the case of one member because he thought the recount
> was a waste of time to begin with. *Nothing* was said by the board members
> about intimidation or protests and no protesters could be heard in the room.
You picked a fine time to buy in to the selective transmissions from
the "liberal media"!!
> > Listen, I have news for you, Republicans are all done being nice while the
> > liberals rant and rave their nonsense on the airwaves 24x7. What you are
> > witnessing is conservative America reaching the point where we are not
> > willing to take it any mroe and fighting back.
Damn "fighting back" for the Republicans sure pays better than
protesting for the Liberals.
> Don't be an ass... A manual recoungt is one thing, but doing it over
> and over again, and changing the rules along the way while at the same
> time missing dealines is another
I think most fair-minded people just want it done once accurately. If
the Republican PR machine had gotten out of the way it could quite
possibly be over by now.
Rember the Dornan/Sanchez election for Congress two years ago? That one
drug out for a full year--half of Sanchez' term, while congress
scratched their asses about less valid information.
[crickets]
Thought so. Pot. Kettle. Black. Go Bush! Dubya[*] rules!
[*] Yes, I think all Bush supporters should adopt "Dubya" and make it
into a symbol of pride. What better way to disarm the other side?
--
Bruce James Robert Linley | +---+---+--_ | "Ocha tte nigai demo... hito no chi
linley at megami dot org | | |NV | UT | wa atatakakute tottemo amai no"
Programmer, Fortunet Inc. | \ CA \ |___ | "Tea is always bitter... but blood
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA ---------> \*| AZ | is warm and sweet" - Miyu
> Portests are traditionally the actions of liberals. It must be pissing
> off the democrats no end to see republican protestors.
Not at all. But I must admit I wish we had more money to hire them and
then sit back and watch them on tv.
dark Angel wrote:
> Anyone who thinks a manual count is not more
> accurate might need to know this law:
>
> "A manual recount shall be conducted in preference
> to an electronic recount"
>
...when both a manual and an electronic recount are requested.