On Jun 14, 9:40 am, BeamMeUpScotty

<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:

> And isn't the world full of racist, I know the
> Democrat-Socialist party is full of Liberal racist types.

Can you back up that contention using the same (*) strategy as I did?

I dare you to find ONE Liberal who says "My party is full of racists".

-Ramon

(*) Genial, if you pardon my lack of modesty.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 11:27:54 AM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/2013 11:08 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 9:40 am, BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
> > And isn't the world full of racist, I know the
> > Democrat-Socialist party is full of Liberal racist types.
>
> Can you back up that contention using the same (*) strategy as I did?
>
> I dare you to find ONE Liberal who says "My party is full of racists".

I dare you to find a Liberal that isn't lying about their ideology.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 11:37:22 AM6/14/13

to

On Jun 14, 10:27 am, BeamMeUpScotty

You just insulted A LOT OF VOTERS!

Do Jews know that the real anti-Semite, Neo-Nazi party is the
Democrat???

-Ramon

NB: Jews are the most loyal Democratic voters (75%), only surpassed by
Blacks (96%).

The truth will set you free

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 12:19:14 PM6/14/13

to

Of gay porno?

The truth will set you free

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 12:22:03 PM6/14/13

to

American Jews relish the role of martyr. They can't wait to be punished
by Obama and the Maxists. They will sing all the way to the showers.

deadrat

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 12:52:39 PM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/13 10:08 AM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 6/14/2013 3:46 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

<snipped: projection about race/>

Oh, look! Nothing left.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 12:56:20 PM6/14/13

to

Child porn...

Liberals are very accepting of sexual differences.

Loving children is really no worse than any other sexual preference
according to Liberalism.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 1:12:11 PM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/2013 11:37 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> On Jun 14, 10:27 am, BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>> On 6/14/2013 11:08 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 14, 9:40 am, BeamMeUpScotty
>>> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > And isn't the world full of racist, I know the
>>> > Democrat-Socialist party is full of Liberal racist types.
>>
>>> Can you back up that contention using the same (*) strategy as I did?
>>
>>> I dare you to find ONE Liberal who says "My party is full of racists".
>>
>
> > I dare you to find a Liberal that isn't lying about their ideology.
>
> You just insulted A LOT OF VOTERS!

The truth is more important to me than any votes I may produce by
sucking up to and lying to people.

I'd rather go down in flames telling the truth, than to sell my soul to
get a few votes like you've been doing.

You have taught us a lot about your self and your Liberal ideoreligion
right here right now.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 1:19:36 PM6/14/13

to

Liberal-Socialist censorship is funny stuff isn't it?

delete my post and use the IRS to silence the TEA PARTY..... That's a
positive plan for a Nation so proud of its freedoms.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 1:41:28 PM6/14/13

to

On Jun 14, 11:22 am, The truth will set you free

<deutsc...@mutter.com> wrote:

> American Jews relish the role of martyr.
> They can't wait to be punished by Obama and the Maxists.
> They will sing all the way to the showers.

We will take your posts as an admission that you are in Grupo Número
Uno.

-Ramon

--------------------------------

There are THREE kinds of Conservatives:

• One group is busy spreading hatred

• Another group is busy denying that the first group exists

• The 3rd. group is Colin Powell

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 2:50:12 PM6/14/13

to

On Jun 14, 12:57 pm, BeamMeUpScotty

[In a very irresponsible way, Scott wrote:]

> My position is that I didn't write it.....

But you are making jokes with the author. You provide him legitimacy.
You two laugh together. You welcome him as voter for your candidates.

You then wonder why Jewish voters reject you massively (regardless of
how many aircraft carriers or other war toys the Republicans give
Israel).

I would never allow a Liberal to make a comment like that without
giving them an earful/eyeful.

Interestingly, one NEVER finds those comments from Liberals.

The left hates IDEAS (which is fine!)
The Right (PEOPLE).

-Ramon

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 4:06:32 PM6/14/13

to

I laugh and joke with the check-out girl at the grocery store.... That
doesn't mean I agree that she should beat her elderly mother and steal
the old ladies Social Security check.

What a useless human bag of water you are.

Are you Liberal types really this desperate?

You want to destroy me on a personal level with your Saul Alinsky "RULES
FOR RADICALS" tactics and you're desperately trying to link me to
anything that will help you engage in your agenda of personal attacks?

You Liberals try so hard to group people together so you can use their
groups differences to drive a wedge and destroy others possible
alliances, that's very duplicitous and underhanded.

This is just pitiful Liberal behavior, have you violated any religious
organizations or any TEA PARTY GROUPS at you Government JOB in the IRS?

Hows was that one "almost as good as yours wasn't it?"

deadrat

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 4:29:11 PM6/14/13

to

The IRS didn't silence the teahadists, you blithering ignoramus. The
IRS held up tax-free status for some of the money-laundering operations.
But this couldn't affect their political activities. Their political
donations weren't tax deductible whether they got registration or not;
their expenditures on individual campaigns were taxable whether they got
registration of not. Tax exemption would have been retroactive, and so
far the only groups that have had tax-exempt status rejected were
liberal groups.

In any case, these weren't money-making operations; they were money
spending operations.

deadrat

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 4:30:30 PM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/13 12:44 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 6/14/2013 3:40 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> (3) MSNBC's O'Donnell: "You Republican strategists are saying: 'How do
>> we undo this!? Look what we have done to the Latino voters... How can
>> we possibly get them back?'"
>>
>
> Why would Republicans want people that would vote based on skin color?

It's their base?

deadrat

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 4:31:29 PM6/14/13

to

Er, Sparky? Latinos don't form a race. You might want to get that
straight about your future masters.

deadrat

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 5:03:38 PM6/14/13

to

As she rolls her eyes in contempt, no doubt.

> That
> doesn't mean I agree that she should beat her elderly mother and steal
> the old ladies Social Security check.
>
>
> What a useless human bag of water you are.
>
>
> Are you Liberal types really this desperate?
>
>
> You want to destroy me on a personal level

Er, Sparky? No one gives a shit about you on a personal level. OR any
level.

> with your Saul Alinsky "RULES FOR RADICALS" tactics

Have read them? There's nothing nefarious in them.

> and you're desperately trying to link me to
> anything that will help you engage in your agenda of personal attacks?

Crymeafugginriver, you hypocrite. You're one of the most abusive
posters on misc.legal. But here's a hint: just 'cause people make fun
of your ignorance, doesn't mean anyone is out to destroy you. It's just
usenet.

<projection>

> You Liberals try so hard to group people together so you can use their
> groups differences to drive a wedge and destroy others possible
> alliances, that's very duplicitous and underhanded.

</projection>

It's always about the projection.

>
> This is just pitiful Liberal behavior, have you violated any religious
> organizations or any TEA PARTY GROUPS at you Government JOB in the IRS?

The IRS hasn't violated any teahadist or religious organization.

<snip/>

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 5:25:53 PM6/14/13

to

Tell it to your racist Liberal pals.....

I was responding to the LOGIC I was handed in the post.

--

*Rumination*
#52 - Socialism is a philosophy of mediocrity, a creed of intolerance,
and a feeling of malice towards the good fortune of others!

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 5:29:54 PM6/14/13

to

But your Liberal pal just told me that the Latino block of voters was
all Liberal voters..... I figure you want racial blocks so you must
want the KKK too.

They vote as a racial block.

Are you discriminating by racial blocks that you want to woo?

What a sorry pack of racists you Liberals are.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 5:33:38 PM6/14/13

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 6:31:16 PM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/2013 6:07 PM, deadrat wrote:
> On 6/14/13 4:25 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> On 6/14/2013 4:31 PM, deadrat wrote:
>>> On 6/14/13 12:46 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>> On 6/14/2013 3:38 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>>>> "With Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc in the
>>>>> nation,
>>>>
>>>> ...."]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Skin color is reduced by Liberalism to being a voting bloc?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Boy is that racist.
>>>
>>> Er, Sparky? Latinos don't form a race. You might want to get that
>>> straight about your future masters.
>>>
>>>
>> "Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc"
>
> That may be, but that bloc is not based on race.

Then why is a crime against a Latino a racial hate crime if you call
him/her a "Beaner" You can change that out with black guy and calling
him/her the appropriate slur. Any way you cut it, Latino's are a
"racial" block in the Liberal world. I see people as different and
NOne vote as a block

Now I'm confused..... when is a racial hate crime NOT about race?

Only when the Race is Latino?

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her
experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a
white male who hasn’t lived that life,” said Judge Sotomayor,

Are white males a race?

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 6:46:24 PM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/2013 6:14 PM, deadrat wrote:
> On 6/14/13 4:29 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> On 6/14/2013 4:30 PM, deadrat wrote:
>>> On 6/14/13 12:44 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>> On 6/14/2013 3:40 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (3) MSNBC's O'Donnell: "You Republican strategists are saying: 'How do
>>>>> we undo this!? Look what we have done to the Latino voters... How can
>>>>> we possibly get them back?'"
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why would Republicans want people that would vote based on skin color?
>>>
>>> It's their base?
>>
>> But your Liberal pal just told me that the Latino block of voters was
>> all Liberal voters..... I figure you want racial blocks so you must
>> want the KKK too.
>
> Latinos come in all shades of skin color. They aren't a race, and are
> quite disparate ethnically. They share certain experiences, and they
> vote their perceived interests. Just like us white folks.

So do blacks and whites.... yet you count those colors as voter blocks.
And I keep hearing Democrats tell republicans that they are chasing away
the Latino voting block. This run and hide from that is funny.

What color is a race hate crime when you use the "N" word? If I call a
white guy that "N" word while kicking his ass, is it a hate crime?

In a racial crime you want to have miles of room to fudge the race but
suddenly you want to split hairs on what a Latino really is. You
Liberals are pitiful. You Liberals better learn to check your racism
at the door because I intend to call you Libs on it every single time.
So I plan on being busier than a $2 whore on a Friday night.

deadrat

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 7:20:10 PM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/13 5:31 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 6/14/2013 6:07 PM, deadrat wrote:
>> On 6/14/13 4:25 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>> On 6/14/2013 4:31 PM, deadrat wrote:
>>>> On 6/14/13 12:46 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>> On 6/14/2013 3:38 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>>>>> "With Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc in the
>>>>>> nation,
>>>>>
>>>>> ...."]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Skin color is reduced by Liberalism to being a voting bloc?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Boy is that racist.
>>>>
>>>> Er, Sparky? Latinos don't form a race. You might want to get that
>>>> straight about your future masters.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> "Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc"
>>
>> That may be, but that bloc is not based on race.
>
> Then why is a crime against a Latino a racial hate crime if you call
> him/her a "Beaner"

It's not a crime to call someone a "Beaner."

> You can change that out with black guy and calling
> him/her the appropriate slur. Any way you cut it, Latino's are a
> "racial" block in the Liberal world. I see people as different and
> NOne vote as a block

One person a bloc cannot make. What percentage of old white men voted
for Rmoney? Were they a bloc?

> Now I'm confused.....

I know, Sparky. Still and again.

> when is a racial hate crime NOT about race?

Hate crimes are crimes motivated by animus toward a person based on various
characteristics -- race, ethnicity, religion, etc.

> Only when the Race is Latino?

There is no Latino race.

>
> “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her
> experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a
> white male who hasn’t lived that life,” said Judge Sotomayor,

And then she went on to explain that such feeling was dangerous, which
is why judges must be guided by the law. Where is the word race applied
to Latinos in this quote?

> Are white males a race?

Half of one.

Latinos are people who came from or whose ancestors came from
Spanish-speaking regions. They are all shades of skin color -- white,
brown, black.

deadrat

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 7:27:34 PM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/13 5:46 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 6/14/2013 6:14 PM, deadrat wrote:
>> On 6/14/13 4:29 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>> On 6/14/2013 4:30 PM, deadrat wrote:
>>>> On 6/14/13 12:44 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>> On 6/14/2013 3:40 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (3) MSNBC's O'Donnell: "You Republican strategists are saying: 'How do
>>>>>> we undo this!? Look what we have done to the Latino voters... How can
>>>>>> we possibly get them back?'"
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why would Republicans want people that would vote based on skin color?
>>>>
>>>> It's their base?
>>>
>>> But your Liberal pal just told me that the Latino block of voters was
>>> all Liberal voters..... I figure you want racial blocks so you must
>>> want the KKK too.
>>
>> Latinos come in all shades of skin color. They aren't a race, and are
>> quite disparate ethnically. They share certain experiences, and they
>> vote their perceived interests. Just like us white folks.
>
>
> So do blacks and whites....

A small to vanishing number of black people have white skin. A small to
vanishing number of white people have black skin.

> yet you count those colors as voter blocks.

I don't count anybody. Race is self-identified.

> And I keep hearing Democrats tell republicans that they are chasing away
> the Latino voting block. This run and hide from that is funny.

Voting blocs need not be based on race. What's so hard about this?

> What color is a race hate crime when you use the "N" word? If I call a
> white guy that "N" word while kicking his ass, is it a hate crime?

If you attacked him because he was white or because you mistakenly
thought he was black, then yes. What's your point?

> In a racial crime you want to have miles of room to fudge the race but
> suddenly you want to split hairs on what a Latino really is.

A Latino is someone from a Spanish-speaking culture or whose ancestors
were. That's the definition. It's not mine.

> You
> Liberals are pitiful. You Liberals better learn to check your racism
> at the door because I intend to call you Libs on it every single time.
> So I plan on being busier than a $2 whore on a Friday night.

You're gonna be hard pressed to have more than $5 at the end of the
night, Sparky. The only thing you can call is attention to your ignorance.

> “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her
> experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a
> white male who hasn’t lived that life,” said Judge Sotomayor,

I have no idea why you think this is important.

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 7:29:27 PM6/14/13

to

Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> 1) Ask this lady:
>
> "Of course it is racist! My dad cannot say it, but I can".
> -Meghan McCain, born and raised in Arizona, when asked about AZ
> SB-1070.

And you think some statement by some unknown lady transcends my logic? Why
would you think that? Have I proved to you that I am incapable of thinking
for myself, and need some unknown surragate to do it for me?

Why don't you address the real problem. Arizona is the whipping boy for
millions of illegals coming across our border into this country and going no
further that Arizona in order to collect government handed out freebies. Of
course the real problem is the freebies. - They shouldn't even exist. But if
you liberals want them, then figure out some waqy for Arizona to get them to
its citizens and not to illegals. And, while you are at it, figure out how
to keep those illegals from traveling to other states and destroying their
freebie systems. IOW, address the real problem.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 7:33:18 PM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/2013 7:20 PM, deadrat wrote:
> On 6/14/13 5:31 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> On 6/14/2013 6:07 PM, deadrat wrote:
>>> On 6/14/13 4:25 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>> On 6/14/2013 4:31 PM, deadrat wrote:
>>>>> On 6/14/13 12:46 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/14/2013 3:38 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>>>>>> "With Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc in the
>>>>>>> nation,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...."]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Skin color is reduced by Liberalism to being a voting bloc?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boy is that racist.
>>>>>
>>>>> Er, Sparky? Latinos don't form a race. You might want to get that
>>>>> straight about your future masters.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> "Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc"
>>>
>>> That may be, but that bloc is not based on race.
>>
>> Then why is a crime against a Latino a racial hate crime if you call
>> him/her a "Beaner"
>
> It's not a crime to call someone a "Beaner."

That's pitiful, playing games when we both know that three guys of a
different color whip one person of another race and they call the person
getting their ass kicked a racial slur.... you and I know that that
slur will be used to make it a race hate crime. Unless maybe it's a
white male getting that ass whooping.

You hide from "race" when it's you calling an ethnic group a racial name
but when you get to cry that there was a hate crime, suddenly you want
to make it all vague and put any racial slur from a KKK member into the
hate crime box.

--

*Rumination*
#12 - It's what you learn, after you know it all, that counts.

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 7:36:20 PM6/14/13

to

Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> (3) MSNBC's O'Donnell: "You Republican strategists are saying: 'How do
> we undo this!? Look what we have done to the Latino voters... How can
> we possibly get them back?'"
>

> Steve Schmidt, Top Republican Strategist (*), agreeing: "If we [the
> GOP] had a deliberate strategy to antagonize every Latino voter in
> this country, it is not possible that we could have done a better
> job".
>
> "The Republican Party cannot be a national party if it doesn't compete
> in the Hispanic market - Look at those numbers: we have big, big
> problems."
>
> (*) Played by Woody Harrelson in the McCain campaign HBO movie.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

It isn't the, "Hispanic Market" that's the problem. Its, the freebie market.
What kind of an economic system woulde steal from the industrious and give
to the indolent, and for how long would such a system survive? Why don't you
guys see that there is no way that everyone can live off of the government?
The obvious way to go is to insist that all who can should work and pay
their own way. At the least, these should be idolized, and at best, they
should get more than everyone else.

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 7:38:46 PM6/14/13

to

Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> (4) Check with Jeb Bush:
>
> http://tinyurl.Com/6drgb6h
> http://tinyurl.Com/73joubu
> http://tinyurl.Com/7d3l9cr
> http://swampland.time.Com/2012/02/24/did-jeb-bush-actually-say-that/
>
> Jeb married a Mexican lady, and they lived here in Houston. After she
> was ostracized in the country clubs, they decided to move to a city
> where Hispanics rule: Miami. He has been one of the most popular
> politicians in Florida's history. Founded some Hispanic group (not for
> the poor!!).
>
But he's a Republican! How can you admit he's capable of doing anyone any
good at all? I thought all Republicans were children of Satan.....

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 7:42:45 PM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/2013 7:36 PM, Bill Graham wrote:
> Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> (3) MSNBC's O'Donnell: "You Republican strategists are saying: 'How do
>> we undo this!? Look what we have done to the Latino voters... How can
>> we possibly get them back?'"
>>
>> Steve Schmidt, Top Republican Strategist (*), agreeing: "If we [the
>> GOP] had a deliberate strategy to antagonize every Latino voter in
>> this country, it is not possible that we could have done a better
>> job".
>>
>> "The Republican Party cannot be a national party if it doesn't compete
>> in the Hispanic market - Look at those numbers: we have big, big
>> problems."
>>
>> (*) Played by Woody Harrelson in the McCain campaign HBO movie.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
> It isn't the, "Hispanic Market" that's the problem.

No but the Fact Liberals divide people up like that and suggest they
vote a certain way because their skin is within a specific range of
color is telling about Liberalism.

Its says little about the voting but a lot about who the real racists are.

--

*Rumination*
#24 - Business is the art of making painful choices and getting it right
often enough to stay in business.

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 7:47:26 PM6/14/13

to

Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

> (5) Texas GOP official -- "Hispanics and Asian Americans are
> "maggots" who voted for Obama"
>
> http://www.star-telegram.Com/2012/11/08/4399621/hardin-county-gop-official-wants.html

In his first Presidentiol bid, 95% of the, "Third World People" voted for
Obama, so he is correct.... Obama won the presidency partly because he was
half black. All the white votes he got were because he was a good,
campaigner and looked like he would make a good president. I personally
liked him better than Mcain, but I couldn;t vote for a liberal. If Jesus
Christ was running on the Democratic ticket as a liberal, and Adolf Hitler
was running on the Republican ticket as a conservative, I would vote for
Adolf....... I am as prejudiced against liberals as the third world
population in this country is against white people.....

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 7:51:16 PM6/14/13

to

Ramon F Herrera wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> (8) Colin Powell Accuses GOP Of Racism: They ‘Still Look Down On
> Minorities'
>
>
> http://www.mediaite.com/tv/colin-powell-accuses-gop-of-racism-they-still-look-down-on-minorities/

Is that why 95% of the minorities in this country voted for Obama? (While he
got nearly 50% of the white vote)

The facts deny your assertion, Ramon.

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 8:42:41 PM6/14/13

to

Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> On Jun 14, 9:40 am, BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
> > And isn't the world full of racist, I know the
> > Democrat-Socialist party is full of Liberal racist types.
>
> Can you back up that contention using the same (*) strategy as I did?
>
> I dare you to find ONE Liberal who says "My party is full of racists".
>
> -Ramon
You can't, because liberals define racism as discrimination against people
of color, and deny that it is also discrimination against white people. IOW,
only white people can be racists to a liberal. Discrimination against white
people, is, "Reverse discrimination" and is perfectly ligitimate to a
liberal. In my case, I broaden it to mean any discrimination against anyone
because of anything he/she had no control over, but was either born with, or
raised into from birth. Discrimination against gays is racism in my
book.....

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 8:49:51 PM6/14/13

to

On Jun 14, 6:51 pm, "Bill Graham" <w...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Ramon F Herrera wrote:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > (8) Colin Powell Accuses GOP Of Racism: They ‘Still Look Down On
> > Minorities'
>

> >http://www.mediaite.com/tv/colin-powell-accuses-gop-of-racism-they-st...

>

> Is that why 95% of the minorities in this country
> voted for Obama?

That's BS. I wish it were true, though!! See actual percentages below.

-Ramon

--------------------------

Which is the party where hatred is most concentrated and distilled?

The only ones qualified to make a statement are the victims of
prejudice, persecution and racism themselves. Let's ask them, shall
we?

Here's their response (2008):

- Black folks voted for Obama, by a 96% margin.
- Jewish folks voted for Obama, by a 75% margin.
- Hispanic folks voted for Obama, by a 66% margin.
- Asian folks voted for Obama, by a 63% margin.
- Gay folks voted for Obama, by an unknown margin.

ps: Oh, I almost forgot the largest minority of all:

http://patriot.Net/~ramon/misc/GOP-Hates-Women-and-Feeling-is-Mutual.jpg
http://www.usatoday.Com/news/politics/story/2012-04-01/swing-states-poll/53930684/1

ps: the 2012 percentages are even better.

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 8:56:00 PM6/14/13

to

The truth will set you free wrote:
> On 6/14/2013 12:36 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>
>> It is that time of the year, to parade my massive and growing
>> collection.
>>
>> -Ramon
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> Of gay porno?

For every item in his collection, he passed up two that proved his
opponent's case, but they ended up in his garbage can.....

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 9:00:55 PM6/14/13

to

The truth will set you free wrote:

> On 6/14/2013 8:37 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>> On Jun 14, 10:27 am, BeamMeUpScotty
>> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:

>>> On 6/14/2013 11:08 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jun 14, 9:40 am, BeamMeUpScotty
>>>> <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > And isn't the world full of racist, I know the
>>>> > Democrat-Socialist party is full of Liberal racist types.
>>>
>>>> Can you back up that contention using the same (*) strategy as I
>>>> did?
>>>
>>>> I dare you to find ONE Liberal who says "My party is full of
>>>> racists".
>>>
>>

>> > I dare you to find a Liberal that isn't lying about their
>> ideology. You just insulted A LOT OF VOTERS!
>>
>> Do Jews know that the real anti-Semite, Neo-Nazi party is the
>> Democrat???
>>
>> -Ramon
>>
>> NB: Jews are the most loyal Democratic voters (75%), only surpassed
>> by Blacks (96%).

>>
> American Jews relish the role of martyr. They can't wait to be
> punished by Obama and the Maxists. They will sing all the way to the
> showers.

And their song of choice is, "We Shall Overcome" - What amazes me it that
they are so passive and forgiving. You'd think that after suffering through
the Holocaust, they would be rabid, "Stomp on the tyrants of the world"
Republicans....:^)

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 9:27:34 PM6/14/13

to

BeamMeUpScotty wrote:

> On 6/14/2013 3:40 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> (3) MSNBC's O'Donnell: "You Republican strategists are saying: 'How
>> do we undo this!? Look what we have done to the Latino voters... How
>> can we possibly get them back?'"
>>
>

> Why would Republicans want people that would vote based on skin color?
>
>

> You must want the KKK voters too, because they will also vote based on
> skin color like you Liberals want people to do.
>
>
> Their actual skin color is irrelevant, the important fact is that they
> will vote based on skin color. That's the basis of Liberalism.

No. The basis of liberalism is stupidity. Why complicate such a simple
concept?

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 9:40:37 PM6/14/13

to

Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>
> The left hates IDEAS (which is fine!)
> The Right (PEOPLE).
>
> -Ramon

But you are always quoting people to justify your idealogy, (like the woman
above that said she disagreed with the AZ law that her husband voted for.)
So you too are guilty of putting people above your ideaology.

deadrat

unread,

Jun 14, 2013, 9:43:39 PM6/14/13

to

On 6/14/13 6:33 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 6/14/2013 7:20 PM, deadrat wrote:
>> On 6/14/13 5:31 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>> On 6/14/2013 6:07 PM, deadrat wrote:
>>>> On 6/14/13 4:25 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>> On 6/14/2013 4:31 PM, deadrat wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/14/13 12:46 PM, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/14/2013 3:38 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>>>>>>> "With Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc in the
>>>>>>>> nation,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...."]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Skin color is reduced by Liberalism to being a voting bloc?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Boy is that racist.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Er, Sparky? Latinos don't form a race. You might want to get that
>>>>>> straight about your future masters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> "Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc"
>>>>
>>>> That may be, but that bloc is not based on race.
>>>
>>> Then why is a crime against a Latino a racial hate crime if you call
>>> him/her a "Beaner"
>>
>> It's not a crime to call someone a "Beaner."
>
>

> That's pitiful, playing games.

Sorry, your writing is less than clear. Don't automatically blame the
receiver. Check the transmitter first

> when we both know that three guys of a
> different color whip one person of another race and they call the person
> getting their ass kicked a racial slur.... you and I know that that
> slur will be used to make it a race hate crime. Unless maybe it's a
> white male getting that ass whooping.

I think I see your problem. The specific one here, not the general one
of your abyssal ignorance. There isn't such a thing as a "race hate
crime." There are just hate crimes. The law lists the types of
prejudice that qualify. Race is one; ethnicity is another.

>
> You hide from "race" when it's you calling an ethnic group a racial name

Me? I don't call ethnic groups names.

> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:27:34 -0700, "Bill Graham" <we...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>>> You must want the KKK voters too, because they will also vote based on
>>> skin color like you Liberals want people to do.
>>>
>>>
>>> Their actual skin color is irrelevant, the important fact is that they
>>> will vote based on skin color. That's the basis of Liberalism.
>>
>>No. The basis of liberalism is stupidity.
>

> If that's the case---why is the ENTIRE history from the landing to the
> foundation of the nation resting on a PROGRESSIVE foundation and every
> incidence of opposition to almost all programs, policies have had a
> vicious opposition from CONSERVATIVES?

So let's see....according to you it were the progressives that wanted to
secure and protect our individual freedoms and liberties. Now the
progressives are those that wish to strip people of their individual
freedoms and liberties. Yet you try to assert they somehow share the same
ideals because you try to paste the same label on both.

Well.....securing and protecting liberty and freedom is NOT a progressive
policy. It is rather a strong conservative policy that dates back throughout
recorded history.

Simply because you want to claim they were progressives, doesn't make it so,
and progressives of today have nothing to do with those who founded this
country or their views no matter what labels you want to try to apply to
make you appear to be the same.

Message has been deleted

pyotr filipivich

unread,

Jun 15, 2013, 1:13:03 AM6/15/13

to

Let the Record show that "Scout" on or about Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:17:33
-0400 did write, type or otherwise cause to appear in
talk.politics.guns the following:

"hen one reads any strongly individual piece of writing, one has the
impression of seeing a face somewhere behind the page. It is not
necessarily the actual face of the writer. I feel this very strongly
with Swift, with Defoe, with Fielding, Stendhal, Thackeray, Flaubert,
though in several cases I do not know what these people looked like
and do not want to know. What one sees is the face that the writer
ought to have. Well, in the case of Dickens I see a face that is not
quite the face of Dickens's photographs, though it resembles it. It is
the face of a man of about forty, with a small beard and a high
colour. He is laughing, with a touch of anger in his laughter, but no
triumph, no malignity. It is the face of a man who is always fighting
against something, but who fights in the open and is not frightened,
the face of a man who is generously angry in other words, of a
nineteenth-century liberal, a free intelligence, a type hated with
equal hatred by all the smelly little orthodoxies which are now
contending for our souls. "
George Orwell
"Charles Dickens" (1939), Inside the Whale and Other Essays (1940)

I'll repeat the salient part:

"... It is the face of a man who is always fighting against something,
but who fights in the open and is not frightened, the face of a man
who is generously angry in other words, of a NINETEENTH-CENTURY
LIBERAL, a FREE INTELLIGENCE A TYPE HATED with equal hatred by all the
smelly little orthodoxies which are now contending for our souls. "

One of those "smelly little orthodoxies" is the Democrat party,
home of the race baiting "Progressives." (as they were known under
President Wilson), who became "Liberals" in the 30's, but changed back
again in the 1990's. Whatever they call themselves, they still
believe that it is only Government Employees who can make the right
choices for the populace. They miss the old glory days of having a
King.

--
pyotr filipivich
Most of the intelligentsia haven't studied history, so much
as they've absorbed the Correct Position on "History".

Scout

unread,

Jun 15, 2013, 2:04:18 AM6/15/13

to

<Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
news:lirnr8dhqb6qtvo91...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:17:33 -0400, "Scout"
> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>><Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
>>news:sjlnr8lmevh6kub7r...@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:27:34 -0700, "Bill Graham" <we...@comcast.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You must want the KKK voters too, because they will also vote based on
>>>>> skin color like you Liberals want people to do.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Their actual skin color is irrelevant, the important fact is that they
>>>>> will vote based on skin color. That's the basis of Liberalism.
>>>>
>>>>No. The basis of liberalism is stupidity.
>>>
>>> If that's the case---why is the ENTIRE history from the landing to the
>>> foundation of the nation resting on a PROGRESSIVE foundation and every
>>> incidence of opposition to almost all programs, policies have had a
>>> vicious opposition from CONSERVATIVES?
>>
>>So let's see....according to you it were the progressives that wanted to
>>secure and protect our individual freedoms and liberties.
>

>>* Now the

>>progressives are those that wish to strip people of their individual
>>freedoms and liberties. Yet you try to assert they somehow share the same
>>ideals because you try to paste the same label on both.
>
>

> Well, there ya go
>
> That sentence *---is called a fallacy claim
>
> No such evidence supports it.

Then quit making them by implying that the founding fathers are progressives
of the same stripe you claim to be.

You think that terrorists vote? How do you know this? Do they answer
exit polls?

> Thanks for telling the truth about who Democrats are.... racists and
> terrorists. But then, we already knew that. Your confession didn't
> change the reality that has always existed.
>
> The KKK wouldn't vote racial for Republicans because Republicans aren't
> advertising for any racial BLOC to vote based on their skin color only
> Democrats are doing that.

OK, Sparky, how do you explain the fact that 88% of Republicans are
white? Coincidence?

> So the isolated case of the KKK that you use
> which is a fallacy, has nothing to do with their own skin skin color.
> And while you accept and embrace your racial bloc voters the Republicans
> are discouraging the KKK

The Republicans don't officially invite the KKK into their ranks, but
what party do you suppose David Duke came from? But the relentless
Republican campaign against minority voters makes it clear which is the
better choice for KKK members. But really, how many KKK members are there?

> and any hate groups from getting into any seats
> of power in the Republican party. The TEA PARTY openly and in public
> chastized racists when they showed up at TEA PARTY events.

Yeah, they just carried signs portraying Obama as Hitler and questioning
his citizenship.

> But you democrats love the likes of Rev. Wright

Perhaps you ought to learn a little about the Rev. During the 2008
campaign, _The Chicago Tribune_ published a piece by a white man who had
attended Trinity Lutheran and fallen in love with a black woman and
proposed to her. She went to Wright and said she would marry the man
except she felt she was betraying her racial history by marrying a white
man. Wright told her she was wrong, and that love was more important
than race. Didn't see that on YouTube, didja?

> and The Muslim Brotherhood

The Muslim Brotherhood is Egyptian.

> and Louis Farrakhan's racial and religious HATE

The Nation of Islam is a separatist organization, although on occasion
they have run their own candidates for local offices. In 2008, Louis
Farrakhan thought Obama would be some kind of world savior. He doesn't
think much of Obama anymore.

<snip/>

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jun 15, 2013, 1:37:30 PM6/15/13

to

On Jun 15, 11:13 am, BeamMeUpScotty

<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:

> Black panthers are "similar human garbage" they vote DEmocrat.

The New Black Panthers and Louis Farrakhan have been officially
designated as Hate groups. Being this a free country, they may vote
for whatever party they desire but they are rejected by the Democratic
Party ("try across the aisle", we tell them). Those groups have
NOTHING to do with the Democrats.

Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Farrakhan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party

Southern Poverty Law Center:
http://goo.gl/qEaM7
http://goo.gl/wYLDm

White Separatists and Black Separatists hold hands together, for their
objective is the same.

Meanwhile:

The Tea Party has undeniable links with White Supremacism and similar
human garbage:

- There is a Tea Party Caucus in Congress
- The Tea Party gave an official reply to the SOTU address.

-Ramon

--------------------------

I posted the following reply to a Republican CNN contributor:

"Dr. Bennett:

"As we speak, a white supremacist/separatist group (Western
Civilization Youth) is being welcomed at the CPAC Conference.

http://www.westernyouth.org

"Do tell: what are the odds that the Democratic party will accept such
racist group in their conferences???

Update: The most popular Republican politico on the land, Chris
Christie, was banned from CPAC, the same conference which welcomes
with open arms the likes of NumbersUSA, CIS, FAIR, Western
Civilization Youth and similar human garbage.

K Wills

unread,

Jun 15, 2013, 5:41:10 PM6/15/13

to

On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:48:12 -0700 (PDT), "Ramon F. Herrera"
<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

>
>They have aligned themselves quite nicely: While White Supremacists,
>Neo-Nazis, KKK, hard core racists and similar human garbage vote
>Republican all minorities vote Democrat (duh!!!!)
>

That's not true.

>BTW: According to the mainstream definition, in order to be racism, it
>must contain HATRED, which is a characteristic held by the Right in an
>almost monopolistic fashion.

Interesting, but I'm not following how this applies your
erroneous claim above.

>
>That is the reason the Democratic Party is as united as ever, while
>the Republican Party is going through the worst crisis in its history,
>and its very existence is at stake.

Seems both parties are doing fine. Could you offer some specific
examples of your claim?

--
"I think Kent's more of a groundhog than a mole."
-- Chuck Bryant

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 15, 2013, 9:51:03 PM6/15/13

to

No. My assumption is that in every presidentiol election the two main
candidates are normally nearly equally split... That is, there are nearly as
many Republicans as there are Democrats, so the winner usually only wins by
a nose. The very idea that 95% of one demographic group would vote for one
candidate is preposterous. So, obvioulsly over 45% of the black people in
this country voted for Obama for one simple reason. He was half black. Now,
had over 45% of the white voters voted for John McCain simply because he was
White, we would have been laughed at by the entire world, and called the
most racist country on earth.... So, how come nobody is laughing at the
black people? Don't you think there is a double standard here?

deadrat

unread,

Jun 15, 2013, 10:17:06 PM6/15/13

to

Please, please keep telling black people how racist they are, and how
they are unable to discern their own best interests so they vote solely
on race.

In 2008, evangelical Christians voted 88% for McCain.

In 2012, Utah voted 73% for Rmoney. In the Republican primary that year
he got 93% of the vote.

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 15, 2013, 10:51:06 PM6/15/13

to

Progressives are just a term they started to use when "Liberals" started to
go out of favor. And what it meant 30 yeqrs ago isn;lt the same thing as
what it means now. Neither is any other political term. They all have to be
evaluated in the terms of what they mean right now. This is why its
ridiculous to say that Nazi's were far rightists, for example. They followed
their leader into hell, and the far right today does no such thing.

Clave

unread,

Jun 15, 2013, 11:28:22 PM6/15/13

to

"Bill Graham" <we...@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:iO-dnRIkF56XhyDM...@giganews.com...
> Clave wrote:

<...>

>> So your contention is that blacks are too racist or stupid to to make
>> informed political decisions in their own interests.
>

> No. My assumption is that in every presidentiol election the two main
> candidates are normally nearly equally split... That is, there are nearly
> as many Republicans as there are Democrats, so the winner usually only
> wins by a nose. The very idea that 95% of one demographic group would vote

> for one candidate is preposterous....

I told you I find that as-yet-unsupported assumption to be rather stupid.
Again, do you have anything other than your own ass to support it?

As was already pointed out to you, do you think the fact that 88% of
evangelical Christians voted for McCain is preposterous? Or that the
population of Utah broke 73% for Rmoney?

Or is your statistical outrage confined to dark-skinned demographics?

Just as a general question, can you point to anything the GOP has done to
benefit minorities in general in the last 50 years? Do you think it's gone
unnoticed by them that the GOP has done everything in their power during the
last several election cycles to make sure that as few of them vote as
possible?

Perhaps they as a group are simply smarter than you.

Jim

Bill Graham

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 12:12:29 AM6/16/13

to

The Evangelical Christians are also badly prejudiced, as are the Utah
Mormons. but neither are quite as prejudiced as are this nations voting
blacks. 95% is 95%, and it is much larger than your EC's 88% or Utah's 73%.
Now, what were you saying about what the GOP has done for minorities? - Lets
put it this way, your liberal tendency to institute give away programs for
minorities has taught them that they are inferior and need the help of the
taxpayers to make their way through life. The Conservatives know that this
is not the way for these people to achieve equality. Anyone who thinks
government give-away programs will help minorities should just take a
careful look at the American Indian.

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 1:19:45 AM6/16/13

to

On Jun 15, 11:12 pm, "Bill Graham" <w...@comcast.net> wrote:

> The Evangelical Christians are also badly prejudiced,
> as are the Utah Mormons. but neither are quite as prejudiced
> as are this nations voting blacks.

You've got it exactly backwards, Mr. Graham, and have demonstrated
your utter inability of placing yourself in other person's situation.

WHY, OH WHY WOULD I VOTE FOR A PARTY THAT HATES ME?????

That consideration is a primal one, comes from the instinct of
survival and self-preservation for the majority of minorities and thus
it TRUMPS any other consideration.

We suppose that you -always the good Christian- would offer the other
cheek (either ones north or south of your waist)???

It is ironic and refreshing to learn that a top Republican politico
otherwise perceived as extremist has the ability that you lack:

“Republicans have been losing both the respect and votes of a group of
people who already identify with many of our beliefs in family, faith
and conservative values. Hispanics should be a natural and sizable
part of the Republican base,” Rand Paul said. “But they have steadily
drifted away from the GOP in each election. I think this says more
about Republicans than it does about Hispanics.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/03/19/rand-paul-on-immigration-reform/

-Ramon

--------------------

deadrat

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 1:24:06 AM6/16/13

to

Please, please keep telling minority voters that they believe themselves
to be inferior. Take it from me, they really appreciate it.

> Anyone who thinks government give-away programs will help
> minorities should just take a careful look at the American Indian.

The US government program for American Indians have been almost entirely
take-away, not give-away.

deadrat

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 1:27:49 AM6/16/13

to

On 6/16/13 12:19 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> On Jun 15, 11:12 pm, "Bill Graham" <w...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > The Evangelical Christians are also badly prejudiced,
> > as are the Utah Mormons. but neither are quite as prejudiced
> > as are this nations voting blacks.
>
> You've got it exactly backwards, Mr. Graham, and have demonstrated
> your utter inability of placing yourself in other person's situation.
>
> WHY, OH WHY WOULD I VOTE FOR A PARTY THAT HATES ME?????
>

Or condescends to me.

Check out Rand Paul's recent excursion to Howard University where he
asked a student audience if they understood that the founders of the
NAACP were Republicans.

Trust me. Black people just love being lectured on black history by
clueless white people. It's right up there with rap music for them.

Clave

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 1:30:55 AM6/16/13

to

"Bill Graham" <we...@comcast.net> wrote in message

news:m9udnarbuMetpiDM...@giganews.com...

> blacks....

I notice you like to dance around all the relevant questions.

Can you point to anything the GOP has done to benefit minorities in general

in the last 50 years?

Apparently not.

Do you think it's gone unnoticed by them that the GOP has done everything in
their power during the last several election cycles to make sure that as few
of them vote as possible?

Apparently you don't want to talk about that either.

I wouldn't either if I were you.

Jim

Clave

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 1:40:18 AM6/16/13

to

"deadrat" <a...@b.com> wrote in message
news:jNWdnbCnZJ1I0SDM...@giganews.com...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ln5RD9BhcCo

Message has been deleted

Scout

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 2:20:22 AM6/16/13

to

"Clave" <ChrisC...@TheMonastery.com> wrote in message
news:kpji9v$5ma$1...@dont-email.me...

Excuse me, are you suggesting that we should specifically target who we
should aid simply because of the color of their skin?

I suggest you consider the message you're putting across because it sure
doesn't make you seem very reasonable.

Clave

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 3:11:10 AM6/16/13

to

"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:kpjl64$fp5$1...@dont-email.me...

>
>
> "Clave" <ChrisC...@TheMonastery.com> wrote in message
> news:kpji9v$5ma$1...@dont-email.me...

<...>

>> Can you point to anything the GOP has done to benefit minorities in
>> general in the last 50 years?
>
> Excuse me, are you suggesting that we should specifically target who we
> should aid simply because of the color of their skin?

Let me look...nope...I didn't say anything like that.

Is reading always this difficult for you?

Jim

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 2:17:04 PM6/16/13

to

"BeamMeUpScotty" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in
message news:oanvt.311069$6q1.1...@en-nntp-06.dc1.easynews.com...

> On 6/16/2013 10:57 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>> On Jun 16, 1:20 am, "Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removemem.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Excuse me, are you suggesting that we should
>> > specifically target who we should aid simply because
>> > of the color of their skin?
>>
>> Not exactly.
>
>

> Liberals target their voters on that criteria...

It might look like that to the selfish and stupid -- something to do with
"equal opportunity" as opposed to "rich white guys".

Jim

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 2:28:52 PM6/16/13

to

On 6/16/2013 1:27 AM, deadrat wrote:
> On 6/16/13 12:19 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>> On Jun 15, 11:12 pm, "Bill Graham" <w...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > The Evangelical Christians are also badly prejudiced,
>> > as are the Utah Mormons. but neither are quite as prejudiced
>> > as are this nations voting blacks.
>>
>> You've got it exactly backwards, Mr. Graham, and have demonstrated
>> your utter inability of placing yourself in other person's situation.
>>
>> WHY, OH WHY WOULD I VOTE FOR A PARTY THAT HATES ME?????

I'm sure I told you, it's because the other one will get you killed.

deadrat

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 2:32:51 PM6/16/13

to

Check your attributions or your snippage.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,

Jun 16, 2013, 2:37:12 PM6/16/13

to

> Please, please keep telling minority voters that they believe themselves
> to be inferior.

If a parent or teacher is telling them this, it's child abuse but the
government and Liberals tell us this every time they ask the kids to
fill out a form that asks them their race and offers them affirmative
action.

Funny that the Liberals think the problem is *WHO* tells them they are
inferior NOT that *SOMEONE* is telling them that they are inferior.

Government can tell people they are inferior as long as Government does
it with a smile and a bribe.