Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Walgreens' Hiring of the Disabled Is NOT Wonderful NOR Upsta

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Fritz Wuehler

unread,
Feb 12, 2008, 8:29:58 PM2/12/08
to
Walgreens' Hiring of the Disabled Is NOT Wonderful
NOR Upstanding
There was a recent news piece about how drug store giant
Walgreens employs the disabled at one of its mega distribution
centers. A full FORTY percent of the workers at this site are
disabled and include those with mental retardation, Downs
Syndrome, autism, etc.

(See http://abcnews.go.com/WN/story?id=4272981&page=1 )

Why, the human resources recruiter there has, herself, cerebral
palsy. Now, may God forgive me, but this woman had it really
bad. Her mouth was distorted, and so was her speech with her
facial expression and body language going way off kilter and
all over the map. I confess that I'd have great discomfort and
difficulty dealing with her person-to-person.

TO BE SURE, WALGREENS IS NOT BEING A SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE,
CHARITABLE EMPLOYER.

What they are doing is what computer giant IBM is doing when it
actively targets homosexuals as prospective workers to program
its computers.

THE REVEAL:

These major employers are out to DOWNWARDLY EQUALIZE WAGES.

Now, what do I mean by that?

Employers do NOT want to pay White wages to blacks. They are
employing every tactic known to man to drag down what White
workers would normally command in a free labor market to what
black workers would command (and I mean command in the absence
of even the minimum wage law).

Actually, the equalization process is even *worse* than this;
I'll present a more refined statement about it below.

Come on people! What would you call it when ultra-cheap, cheap
employers conduct an open-house job fair for homeless people at
a soup kitchen, no less? They are really scraping the bottom of
the barrel for people who might be willing (or desperate
enough) to work for niggardly wages. Most homeless people are
unemployable due to mental conditions, but this doesn't deter
employers in their relentless march - or should I
say, "relentless pounding, pounding down of wages" - to
downwardly equalize all workers' wages.

Today's "socially hip" employer is not "hip" at all!

Today's "socially hip" employer is not an altruistic champion
of the downtrodden underdogs and underclasses.

Today's "socially hip" employer is, in truth, a dishonest,
conscienceless, ruthless exploiter of homos, the disabled, the
mentally defective, the blacks, and even the fatsos!

What a laugh it is when demographic groups such as the homos
and dykes dance in the streets during their "pride" parades
thinking that they are making social headway by being courted
by and integrated into the likes of IBM.

You, homo jerks! You are being exploited. You are being played!
You are being played for fools and as pawns in the downward
wage equalization campaign of the ultra-phoney, ultra-
fraudulent IBM!

(Footnote: IBM, not so long ago, was reported to be hiring
10,000 computer programmers IN INDIA! IN ONE YEAR!! Now, if
hiring cheap, cheap Indians is not the smoking gun of downward
wage equalization, I don't know what is. BTW, if you haven't
discerned it by now, employers are sacrificing quality of
worker for their highest priority which is cheapness of worker.)

Now for the brutal reality - my refined statement of analysis
of the downward equalization of wages... under equal employment
opportunity and the equal pay laws, wages will be downwardly
equalized to the perceived value of the *least* preferred job
candidate per the perception of value of the *lowest* bidding
employer for *his* concept of least preferred job candidate...
EVEN IF THE "IMAGINED" LEAST PREFERRED JOB CANDIDATE NEVER GETS
EMPLOYED BY ANYBODY OR DOESN'T EVEN REALLY EXIST!!!

If you want a copy of my Economics treatise entitled "The
Downward Wage Equalizing Effects of Equal Employment
Opportunity" just send me a request by email at
jay...@hotmail.com.


no surrender

unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 6:34:19 AM2/13/08
to

"Fritz Wuehler" <fr...@spamexpire-200802.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote
in message
news:cac5175126ac4670...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
*****
No thanks...I never encourage the truly self-obessed.

Dennis
>


Emerson Wainwright

unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 8:53:53 PM2/13/08
to
On Feb 12, 8:29 pm, Fritz Wuehler

Sounds as though you would qualify for a job there.

Econotron

unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 9:16:06 PM2/13/08
to
"Fritz Wuehler" <fr...@spamexpire-200802.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote
in message
news:cac5175126ac4670...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> Walgreens' Hiring of the Disabled Is NOT Wonderful
> NOR Upstanding
> There was a recent news piece about how drug store giant
> Walgreens employs the disabled at one of its mega distribution
> centers. A full FORTY percent of the workers at this site are
> disabled and include those with mental retardation, Downs
> Syndrome, autism, etc.
>
> (See http://abcnews.go.com/WN/story?id=4272981&page=1 )
>
> Why, the human resources recruiter there has, herself, cerebral
> palsy. Now, may God forgive me, but this woman had it really
> bad. Her mouth was distorted, and so was her speech with her
> facial expression and body language going way off kilter and
> all over the map. I confess that I'd have great discomfort and
> difficulty dealing with her person-to-person.
>
It may be somewhat cruel, but I can vividly imagine a comedy sketch based on
such a setup.:-)

>
> What they are doing is what computer giant IBM is doing when it
> actively targets homosexuals as prospective workers to program
> its computers.
>
Nope. Gays are a different story. It is not just IBM, but Apple and other
companies, especially those involved in the product design. There is no
secret that homosexuals have a higher than average percentage of creative
people amongst their ranks (not because gays are more creative, but because
creative people have a higher chance to become gays :-)). It is those
resources that the companies are trying to tap into.
e.


Dionisio

unread,
Feb 14, 2008, 1:20:31 AM2/14/08
to
> Fritz Wuehler <fr...@spamexpire-200802.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:
>>You, homo jerks! You are being exploited. You are being played!

How so? In the war for superiority, those who can make do on less are superior. Now, lets
see... A homo with no dependents vs. a hetero with -- oh dear -- dependents. Guess who can
live with the lower salary; And guess who will be praying to make the mortgage.

You dismal fool! The homos win every time! And the icing on the cake is that we don't even
reproduce; Outsourcing that messy function to the cheap "labor pool" of the hets, which is
where all the homos come from in the first place.

Duh.


>>(Footnote: IBM, not so long ago, was reported to be hiring
>>10,000 computer programmers IN INDIA! IN ONE YEAR!!

Hmm... Don't you mean Lenovo?

<guffaw>

>>Now for the brutal reality - my refined statement of analysis
>>of the downward equalization of wages...

Or "My Dissertation on How to Make the Overpaid Feel Like Victims Instead of Parasites."

Wah. Wah. Wah.


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

He has a mind like a steel trap, anything entering gets mangled and twisted.

(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)

Emerson Wainwright

unread,
Feb 14, 2008, 7:16:22 AM2/14/08
to
On Feb 13, 9:16 pm, "Econotron" <njmfi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Fritz Wuehler" <fr...@spamexpire-200802.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote
> in messagenews:cac5175126ac4670...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...

There's another resource the companies are trying to tap into: our
wallets. Advertising targeted to gays continues to increase, and much
less subtly these days than in the past.

Econotron

unread,
Feb 14, 2008, 7:01:06 PM2/14/08
to
"Emerson Wainwright" <emersonw...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e588506c-8881-4764...@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

* There's another resource the companies are trying to tap into: our
* wallets. Advertising targeted to gays continues to increase, and much
* less subtly these days than in the past.

======================================================================

What a big deal? They have to sell stuff. My Jewish friend was recently sold
a dress jacket with a pickle stuck in the front pocket instead of
handkerchief. Didn't do a federal case out of it. :-)
e.


0 new messages