info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Merrick Garland, Extremist
19 views
Skip to first unread message
Rudy Canoza
Mar 30, 2016, 10:13:00 PM3/30/16
to
"It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
centrist, than they really are."
"Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
"Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
are tried in federal courts."
"Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no wrong."
http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
centrist, than they really are."
"Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
"Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
are tried in federal courts."
"Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no wrong."
http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
nickname unavailable
Mar 31, 2016, 12:37:16 AM3/31/16
to
On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, i am demanding a male-to-female gender reassignment surgery wrote:
> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> centrist, than they really are."
>
> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>
> "Garland also takes the government's side--reflexively--in cases regarding
> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> centrist, than they really are."
>
> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>
> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> are tried in federal courts."
>
> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center-- but on the
> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> are tried in federal courts."
>
> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no wrong."
>
> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
you are just pissed because he said its not the states job to pay for a male-to-female gender reassignment surgery.
> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no wrong."
>
> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
Rudy Canoza
Mar 31, 2016, 1:12:03 AM3/31/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
>
The rest of us - people who know things - are glad.
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
> I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>
The rest of us - people who know things - are glad.
Rudy Canoza
Mar 31, 2016, 1:12:10 AM3/31/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
Rudy Canoza
Mar 31, 2016, 1:14:59 AM3/31/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
nickname unavailable
Mar 31, 2016, 9:58:20 AM3/31/16
to
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 12:14:59 AM UTC-5, i am demanding a male-to-female gender reassignment surgery wrote:
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> "Garland also takes the government's side--reflexively--in cases regarding
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center-- but on the
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
> The rest of us - people who know things, like a male-to-female gender reassignment surgery, will produce a third hole - are glad.
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
Rudy Canoza
Mar 31, 2016, 10:24:25 AM3/31/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
> I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
>
The rest of us - people who know things - are glad.
>
Rudy Canoza
Mar 31, 2016, 10:24:31 AM3/31/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
nickname unavailable
Mar 31, 2016, 7:08:41 PM3/31/16
to
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 9:24:31 AM UTC-5, marx says i should demand a male-to-female gender reassignment surgery, paid for with tax payer dollars wrote:
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> "Garland also takes the government's side--reflexively--in cases regarding
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center-- but on the
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
> The rest of us people who know things, are glad marx and rudy, wrote their little red book, here is a excerpt,
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
more from the little red book by marx and rudy: Marx published this decree, adding: "From today, therefore, taxes are abolished! It is high treason to pay taxes. Refusal to pay taxes is the primary duty of the citizen
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_tax_resistance
Karl Marx prosecuted for promoting tax resistance, 1848
During the Revolutions of 1848 in the German states, the royal and military aristocracy prohibited the first popularly-elected parliament from assembling, and that parliament responded by declaring the government out-of-business:
So long as the National Assembly is not at liberty to continue its sessions in Berlin, the Brandenburg cabinet has no right to dispose of government revenues and to collect taxes.
Karl Marx, via his newspaper, the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, published this decree, adding: "From today, therefore, taxes are abolished! It is high treason to pay taxes. Refusal to pay taxes is the primary duty of the citizen!"[92] Marx was later prosecuted for promoting tax resistance, but was acquitted after arguing that it was not illegal to promote tax resistance against an illegal government.[93]
Rudy Canoza
Mar 31, 2016, 9:28:35 PM3/31/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
> I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
>
>
Rudy Canoza
Mar 31, 2016, 9:30:18 PM3/31/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
nickname unavailable
Apr 1, 2016, 2:28:05 AM4/1/16
to
On Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 8:30:18 PM UTC-5, I'm Not Male. I'm Not Female. Please Don't Ask Me About My Junk wrote:
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> "Garland also takes the government's side--reflexively--in cases regarding
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center-- but on the
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
> The rest of us know, I'm Not Male. I'm Not Female. Please Don't Ask Me About My Junk are glad.
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
Rudy Canoza
Apr 1, 2016, 10:45:16 AM4/1/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
> I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
>
>
Rudy Canoza
Apr 1, 2016, 10:45:24 AM4/1/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
nickname unavailable
Apr 1, 2016, 12:29:55 PM4/1/16
to
On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 9:45:24 AM UTC-5, I'm Not Male. I'm Not Female. Please Don't Ask Me About My Junk wrote:
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> "Garland also takes the government's side--reflexively--in cases regarding
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center-- but on the
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
> The rest of us - people who know things - are glad that it will be a huge coalition of liberals, conservatives, and minorities if bernie can overcome the rudy/hillary/marx free trade Troika.
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
https://www.facebook.com/republicansforbernie/
Rudy Canoza
Apr 1, 2016, 7:34:38 PM4/1/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
> I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
>
The rest of us - people who know things - are glad.
>
Rudy Canoza
Apr 1, 2016, 7:34:44 PM4/1/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
nickname unavailable
Apr 1, 2016, 10:25:14 PM4/1/16
to
On Friday, April 1, 2016 at 6:34:44 PM UTC-5, I'm Not Male. I'm Not Female. Please Don't Ask Me About My Junk wrote:
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> "Garland also takes the government's side--reflexively--in cases regarding
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center-- but on the
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
> The rest of us - people who know things - like reason.com, says there are randroids
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
http://reason.com/blog/2005/06/03/is-sec-head-to-be-a-randroid
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 1:00:39 AM4/2/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
> I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
>
The rest of us - people who know things - are glad.
>
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 1:00:51 AM4/2/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
nickname unavailable
Apr 2, 2016, 1:10:59 AM4/2/16
to
On Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 12:00:51 AM UTC-5, I'm Not Male. I'm Not Female. Please Don't Ask Me About My Junk wrote:
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> "Garland also takes the government's side--reflexively--in cases regarding
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center-- but on the
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
> The rest of us - people who know things - are glad that libertarians are now embracing socialism: Bernie Sanders, First Libertarian Socialist?: REASON.COM, the people who know something:)
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
http://reason.com/archives/2015/09/15/bernie-sanders-first-libertarian-sociali
Ground-breaking research by political science experts (actually me, Googling) reveals that a new breed of American politician has been discovered, the first ever "libertarian socialist." And it has a name: Bernie Sanders.
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 1:15:18 AM4/2/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
> I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
>
The rest of us - people who know things - are glad.
>
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 1:15:24 AM4/2/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
nickname unavailable
Apr 2, 2016, 1:26:55 AM4/2/16
to
On Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 12:15:24 AM UTC-5, I'm Not Male. I'm Not Female. Please Don't Ask Me About My Junk wrote:
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> "Garland also takes the government's side--reflexively--in cases regarding
> On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
> was already dead, lied:
> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
> >> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
> >> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
> >> centrist, than they really are."
> >>
> >> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
> >> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
> >> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
> >> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
> >>
> >> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center-- but on the
> >> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
> >> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
> >> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
> >> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
> >> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
> >> are tried in federal courts."
> >>
> >> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
> >> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
> >> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
> >> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
> >> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
> >> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
> >> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
> >> wrong."
> >>
> >> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
> >
> > I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
> >
>
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 1:39:44 AM4/2/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
> I am just pissed because my Marxist president's Marxist nominee for the Supreme Court is not going to get confirmed.
>
The rest of us - people who know things - are glad.
>
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 1:39:52 AM4/2/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 11:24:38 AM4/2/16
to
On 3/30/2016 9:37 PM, I wish I could have felched Saul Alinsky, but he
was already dead, lied:
was already dead, lied:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 9:13:00 PM UTC-5, Rudy Canoza, better than the felcher in every way, wrote:
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> "Garland also takes the government's side—reflexively—in cases regarding
>> "It's standard operating procedure for the establishment media to paint
>> Democratic nominees as more centrist, and Republican nominees as less
>> centrist, than they really are."
>>
>> "Richard Painter, a former chief ethics counsel for the George W. Bush
>> White House, recently went so far as to write that Garland, 'a proven
>> moderate,' is 'exactly the type of person who might have been chosen by
>> the Bush administration.' Apparently he meant that as a compliment."
>>
>> the authority of executive agencies. This might seem like an obscure
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> government-vs.-liberty axis, he does not sit in the center— but on the
>> area of jurisprudence, and it certainly does not set the streets on fire
>> like cases involving gun control or abortion rights do. But it affects a
>> vast number of Americans nonetheless. Federal agencies issue far more
>> rules than Congress issues laws, and each year 10 times more people are
>> tried in administrative proceedings by federal executive agencies than
>> are tried in federal courts."
>>
>> "Sometimes Garland sides with conservatives, and sometimes he sides with
>> liberals. So on a liberal-vs.-conservative axis, he looks like a
>> moderate. But the ideological wing he joins depends on which wing has
>> taken the government's side. That's where he ends up. So on a
>> extreme edge. By contrast, liberals will side against the government in
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
>> some cases, and conservatives will side against it in others. Either one
>> would be preferable to a justice who thinks the government can do no
>> wrong."
>>
>> http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/30/merrick-garland-extremist
>
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 11:24:48 AM4/2/16
to
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 11:56:59 PM4/2/16
to
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 11:57:05 PM4/2/16
to
Rudy Canoza
Apr 2, 2016, 11:57:11 PM4/2/16
to
Rudy Canoza
Apr 3, 2016, 2:07:26 PM4/3/16
to
Rudy Canoza
Apr 3, 2016, 2:07:35 PM4/3/16
to
Rudy Canoza
Apr 4, 2016, 10:10:07 AM4/4/16
to
Rudy Canoza
Apr 4, 2016, 10:10:15 AM4/4/16
to
0 new messages