info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Congress Moves to Stop Obama’s Coup Attempt Against Donald Trump
28 views
Skip to first unread message
Rudy Canoza
Feb 15, 2017, 10:22:33 PM2/15/17
to
On 2/15/2017 7:16 PM, David Hartung wrote:
> http://thetrumpmedia.com/politics/congress-trump-obama/
>
> [...]
> Committee members assume the most important question raised by resigned
> General Michael Flynn’s retirement as national security advisor centers
> around why the eavesdropping on his phone calls by the NSA or FBI was
> even released– and then passed to the news media !
>
> “The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out
> of Washington? Will these leaks be happening as I deal on N.Korea etc?”
> twittered President Donald Trump.
>
> Nunes was definitely correct when specifying the “big problem” with the
> whole problem, in which the media are attempting to turn into a scandal,
> is that a private U.S. citizen, that Flynn was at the time, should
> certainly never have had his phone calls observed and recorded by the
> federal government.
> [...]
>
> So it seems that it was the Obama administration which was engaged in
> illegal activity.
Bullshit. The intelligence services routinely eavesdrop on foreign
diplomats. There is nothing illegal about it. Furthermore, you *like*
that the NSA and others eavesdrop on everyone. You think it's necessary
for national security.
> http://thetrumpmedia.com/politics/congress-trump-obama/
>
> [...]
> Committee members assume the most important question raised by resigned
> General Michael Flynn’s retirement as national security advisor centers
> around why the eavesdropping on his phone calls by the NSA or FBI was
> even released– and then passed to the news media !
>
> “The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out
> of Washington? Will these leaks be happening as I deal on N.Korea etc?”
> twittered President Donald Trump.
>
> Nunes was definitely correct when specifying the “big problem” with the
> whole problem, in which the media are attempting to turn into a scandal,
> is that a private U.S. citizen, that Flynn was at the time, should
> certainly never have had his phone calls observed and recorded by the
> federal government.
> [...]
>
> So it seems that it was the Obama administration which was engaged in
> illegal activity.
Bullshit. The intelligence services routinely eavesdrop on foreign
diplomats. There is nothing illegal about it. Furthermore, you *like*
that the NSA and others eavesdrop on everyone. You think it's necessary
for national security.
Rudy Canoza
Feb 16, 2017, 1:26:03 PM2/16/17
to
On 2/16/2017 9:35 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 02/16/2017 08:55 AM, ed...@post.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 6:45:36 AM UTC-5, NoBody wrote:
>>> It's the leaking of the information that is the crime, IDIOT.
>>
>> Something Trump had no problems with when Wikileaks via Russia leaked
>> all that info on Hillary.
>
> You have actually come up with a valid point.
Not much of one. It's actually pretty minor.
First of all, there is the nature of what was leaked. While the
material hacked from DNC and Clinton e-mail accounts had political
implications, it had no bearing on national security. The material
leaked regarding Flynn and other Trump operatives meeting with Russian
intelligence and diplomatic personnel *does* have national security
implications. It's not in the content of the material leaked; rather,
it is the confirmation that intelligence services other than the NSA
monitor communications. The confirmation of that fact is damaging to
national security.
Secondly, there is the identity of the thieves and the identity of the
leakers. With the hacked Democratic political material, the thieves are
unknown but presumed to be Russians, with the leakers being WikiLeaks.
The Russians probably committed some kind of crime in hacking the e-mail
and other servers, but that's not remotely comparable with the crime of
our own intelligence personnel stealing and leaking classified
information. The hacked Democratic Party data wasn't classified and had
no reason to be. WikiLeaks, of course, committed no crime in releasing
the data once they came into possession of it.
I'm not at all unhappy about the discomfiture of the Trump
administration over what was leaked about them, even though I am
concerned about the future implications of the leaking. There is a lot
of evidence of Trump being a Russian stooge, and it is good for the
American public to see that.
> On 02/16/2017 08:55 AM, ed...@post.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 6:45:36 AM UTC-5, NoBody wrote:
>>
>> Something Trump had no problems with when Wikileaks via Russia leaked
>> all that info on Hillary.
>
> You have actually come up with a valid point.
Not much of one. It's actually pretty minor.
First of all, there is the nature of what was leaked. While the
material hacked from DNC and Clinton e-mail accounts had political
implications, it had no bearing on national security. The material
leaked regarding Flynn and other Trump operatives meeting with Russian
intelligence and diplomatic personnel *does* have national security
implications. It's not in the content of the material leaked; rather,
it is the confirmation that intelligence services other than the NSA
monitor communications. The confirmation of that fact is damaging to
national security.
Secondly, there is the identity of the thieves and the identity of the
leakers. With the hacked Democratic political material, the thieves are
unknown but presumed to be Russians, with the leakers being WikiLeaks.
The Russians probably committed some kind of crime in hacking the e-mail
and other servers, but that's not remotely comparable with the crime of
our own intelligence personnel stealing and leaking classified
information. The hacked Democratic Party data wasn't classified and had
no reason to be. WikiLeaks, of course, committed no crime in releasing
the data once they came into possession of it.
I'm not at all unhappy about the discomfiture of the Trump
administration over what was leaked about them, even though I am
concerned about the future implications of the leaking. There is a lot
of evidence of Trump being a Russian stooge, and it is good for the
American public to see that.
Rudy Canoza
Feb 16, 2017, 1:26:50 PM2/16/17
to
On 2/16/2017 9:36 AM, David Hartung wrote:
> On 02/16/2017 10:17 AM, Fred Oinka wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 10:16:37 PM UTC-5, David Hartung
>> were hired because they were loyal to Obama and his activism. They
>> will seek to destroy the president at every opportunity.
>
> Very true.
Very much stupid crackpot conspiracy-theory bullshit.
> On 02/16/2017 10:17 AM, Fred Oinka wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 10:16:37 PM UTC-5, David Hartung
>> wrote:
>>> http://thetrumpmedia.com/politics/congress-trump-obama/
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> Committee members assume the most important question raised by resigned
>>> General Michael Flynn’s retirement as national security advisor centers
>>> around why the eavesdropping on his phone calls by the NSA or FBI was
>>> even released– and then passed to the news media !
>>>
>>> “The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out
>>> of Washington? Will these leaks be happening as I deal on N.Korea etc?”
>>> twittered President Donald Trump.
>>>
>>> Nunes was definitely correct when specifying the “big problem” with the
>>> whole problem, in which the media are attempting to turn into a scandal,
>>> is that a private U.S. citizen, that Flynn was at the time, should
>>> certainly never have had his phone calls observed and recorded by the
>>> federal government.
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> So it seems that it was the Obama administration which was engaged in
>>> illegal activity.
>>
>> Every single one of Obama's political appointees needs to go. They
>>> http://thetrumpmedia.com/politics/congress-trump-obama/
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> Committee members assume the most important question raised by resigned
>>> General Michael Flynn’s retirement as national security advisor centers
>>> around why the eavesdropping on his phone calls by the NSA or FBI was
>>> even released– and then passed to the news media !
>>>
>>> “The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out
>>> of Washington? Will these leaks be happening as I deal on N.Korea etc?”
>>> twittered President Donald Trump.
>>>
>>> Nunes was definitely correct when specifying the “big problem” with the
>>> whole problem, in which the media are attempting to turn into a scandal,
>>> is that a private U.S. citizen, that Flynn was at the time, should
>>> certainly never have had his phone calls observed and recorded by the
>>> federal government.
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> So it seems that it was the Obama administration which was engaged in
>>> illegal activity.
>>
>> were hired because they were loyal to Obama and his activism. They
>> will seek to destroy the president at every opportunity.
>
> Very true.
Very much stupid crackpot conspiracy-theory bullshit.
Rudy Canoza
Feb 16, 2017, 10:49:04 PM2/16/17
to
On 2/16/2017 3:45 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell nobody lied:
“The big problem I see here is that you have an American citizen who had
his phone calls recorded.” The chump Nunes knows he can't really pursue
that, because *everyone's* calls are monitored and often recorded, and
Nunes likes it like that - as do you. So, he's going to try to
fabricate a big tizzy over "leaks."
Now Nunes himself is feeling heat:
http://www.fresnobee.com/news/politics-government/politics-columns-blogs/political-notebook/article133005064.html
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:22:29 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
> wrote:
>
> wrote:
>
> It's the leaking of the information that is the crime
You didn't read, shit-4-braincell idiot. What did the chump Nunes say?
“The big problem I see here is that you have an American citizen who had
his phone calls recorded.” The chump Nunes knows he can't really pursue
that, because *everyone's* calls are monitored and often recorded, and
Nunes likes it like that - as do you. So, he's going to try to
fabricate a big tizzy over "leaks."
Now Nunes himself is feeling heat:
http://www.fresnobee.com/news/politics-government/politics-columns-blogs/political-notebook/article133005064.html
Rudy Canoza
Feb 17, 2017, 1:45:50 PM2/17/17
to
On 2/17/2017 3:37 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody lied:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:48:03 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/16/2017 3:45 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody lied:
> Are you claiming there was no crime?
I'm stating the fact - yes! - that the hypocrite Nunes was complaining
about something he and you like when it's done to someone else. Nunes
and you feel there is *no* crime by intelligence services eavesdropping
on the phone calls and other electronic communications of American
citizens without a warrant. That's what you believe. It *ought* to be
a crime, but you feel it ought not to be because you're a fucking Nazi.
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:48:03 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/16/2017 3:45 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody lied:
I'm stating the fact - yes! - that the hypocrite Nunes was complaining
about something he and you like when it's done to someone else. Nunes
and you feel there is *no* crime by intelligence services eavesdropping
on the phone calls and other electronic communications of American
citizens without a warrant. That's what you believe. It *ought* to be
a crime, but you feel it ought not to be because you're a fucking Nazi.
Dänk 42Ø
Feb 17, 2017, 9:44:07 PM2/17/17
to
It sounds like Flynn made an UNENCRYPTED call to the Russian embassy,
which at least makes the scandal less worse than had the phone call been
encrypted. Still, under the Logan Act, his phone calls amount to a
violation of the Logan Act, since he was a private citizen at the time.
Bill Shatzer
Feb 18, 2017, 12:33:25 AM2/18/17
to
Dänk 42Ø wrote:
> Diplomats expect to be eavesdropped, which is why they use encryption.
> It sounds like Flynn made an UNENCRYPTED call to the Russian embassy,
> which at least makes the scandal less worse than had the phone call been
> encrypted.
You really can't encrypt telephone conversations unless -both-
> Diplomats expect to be eavesdropped, which is why they use encryption.
> It sounds like Flynn made an UNENCRYPTED call to the Russian embassy,
> which at least makes the scandal less worse than had the phone call been
> encrypted.
telephones are using the same security system*. Somehow I seriously
doubt the telephones at the Russian embassy and Flynn's phone utilized a
common system.
*Well you can encrypt a telephone conversation but unless the guy on the
other end of the phone call is using the same security system, all he
will hear is a series of clicks, whistles, and white noise.
> Still, under the Logan Act, his phone calls amount to a
> violation of the Logan Act, since he was a private citizen at the time.
peace and justice,
Clave
Feb 18, 2017, 2:44:05 AM2/18/17
to
"Bill Shatzer" <ww...@NOcornell.edu> wrote in message
news:o88m7k$hkk$1...@dont-email.me...
> Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>
>> Diplomats expect to be eavesdropped, which is why they use encryption.
>> It sounds like Flynn made an UNENCRYPTED call to the Russian embassy,
>> which at least makes the scandal less worse than had the phone call been
>> encrypted.
>
> You really can't encrypt telephone conversations unless -both- telephones
> are using the same security system*. Somehow I seriously doubt the
> telephones at the Russian embassy and Flynn's phone utilized a common
> system.
True.
>
>> Diplomats expect to be eavesdropped, which is why they use encryption.
>> It sounds like Flynn made an UNENCRYPTED call to the Russian embassy,
>> which at least makes the scandal less worse than had the phone call been
>> encrypted.
>
> You really can't encrypt telephone conversations unless -both- telephones
> are using the same security system*. Somehow I seriously doubt the
> telephones at the Russian embassy and Flynn's phone utilized a common
> system.
So given Flynn's career in intelligence, I rate his (and his Russian
counterparts') chances of not knowing he was using an insecure line at about
zero. Same with the Russians on the other end.
Which raises the question, why did he (and the Russians) engage in those
calls, knowing full well that they were going to be intercepted/monitored?
nickname unavailable
Feb 18, 2017, 6:38:12 AM2/18/17
to
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 1:44:05 AM UTC-6, Clave wrote:
> "Bill Shatzer" <ww...@NOcornell.edu> wrote in message
> news:o88m7k$hkk$1...@dont-email.me...
> > Dänk 42Ø wrote:
.................................................
> "Bill Shatzer" <ww...@NOcornell.edu> wrote in message
> news:o88m7k$hkk$1...@dont-email.me...
> > Dänk 42Ø wrote:
> >> Diplomats expect to be eavesdropped, which is why they use encryption.
> >> It sounds like Flynn made an UNENCRYPTED call to the Russian embassy,
> >> which at least makes the scandal less worse than had the phone call been
> >> encrypted.
> >
> > You really can't encrypt telephone conversations unless -both- telephones
> > are using the same security system*. Somehow I seriously doubt the
> > telephones at the Russian embassy and Flynn's phone utilized a common
> > system.
> True.
>
> So given Flynn's career in intelligence, I rate his (and his Russian
> counterparts') chances of not knowing he was using an insecure line at about
> zero. Same with the Russians on the other end.
>
> Which raises the question, why did he (and the Russians) engage in those
> calls, knowing full well that they were going to be intercepted/monitored?
to answer your questiob try googleing:
>
> So given Flynn's career in intelligence, I rate his (and his Russian
> counterparts') chances of not knowing he was using an insecure line at about
> zero. Same with the Russians on the other end.
>
> Which raises the question, why did he (and the Russians) engage in those
> calls, knowing full well that they were going to be intercepted/monitored?
"analysis of Trump’s successful STING against the Obama holdovers in the so-called intelligence community"
(don't forget the beginning and ending quote marks}
Clave
Feb 18, 2017, 6:56:24 AM2/18/17
to
"nickname unavailable" <gap...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ddef3654-75ec-4d98...@googlegroups.com...
<...>
> to answer your questiob try googleing:
nickname unavailable
Feb 18, 2017, 7:13:46 AM2/18/17
to
On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 5:56:24 AM UTC-6, Clave wrote:
> "nickname unavailable" <gap...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ddef3654-75ec-4d98...@googlegroups.com...
....................................................
> "nickname unavailable" <gap...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ddef3654-75ec-4d98...@googlegroups.com...
<<
> <...>
>
> > to answer your questiob try googleing:
"analysis of Trump’s successful STING against the Obama holdovers in the so-called intelligence community"
(don't forget the beginning and ending quote marks}
>>
<....... you barking nincompoop>
(don't forget the beginning and ending quote marks}
>>
yawn... still another falacious argumentum ad hominem..but that's all you ever have
Clave
Feb 18, 2017, 7:20:25 AM2/18/17
to
news:a833329d-fac9-434e...@googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > to answer your questiob try googlei7ng:
> On Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 5:56:24 AM UTC-6, Clave wrote:
>> "nickname unavailable" <gap...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ddef3654-75ec-4d98...@googlegroups.com...
>
>> <...>
>> "nickname unavailable" <gap...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:ddef3654-75ec-4d98...@googlegroups.com...
>
>>
>> > to answer your questiob try googlei7ng:
>
> "analysis of Trump’s successful
Why don't you just answer the "questiob", you barking nincompoop?
> "analysis of Trump’s successful
Rudy Canoza
Feb 18, 2017, 2:03:50 PM2/18/17
to
On 2/18/2017 6:44 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody lied:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:49:27 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/17/2017 7:25 PM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody lied:
>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:45:27 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>> You are wrong since
>>
>> No.
>>
>> Nunes, the hypocrite, complained about the eavesdropping, not about the
>> leaking of it.
>
> Not relevant to the fact that
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:49:27 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/17/2017 7:25 PM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody lied:
>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:45:27 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>
>> No.
>>
>> Nunes, the hypocrite, complained about the eavesdropping, not about the
>> leaking of it.
>
> Not relevant to the fact that
Rudy Canoza
Feb 19, 2017, 3:10:48 PM2/19/17
to
On 2/19/2017 6:12 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody lied:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:03:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
> Who are you quoting?
Work your way back up the post, shitworm. It's *obvious* whom I'm
quoting, at least to someone who is literate in English.
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:03:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
Work your way back up the post, shitworm. It's *obvious* whom I'm
quoting, at least to someone who is literate in English.
Rudy Canoza
Feb 20, 2017, 3:40:06 PM2/20/17
to
On 2/20/2017 3:35 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody lied:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:10:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
> This is your way of not answering the question
I answered it. It is very clear above whom I am quoting saying “The big
who said it. *That* is what he said is "the big problem," even though
he's lying because he actually *likes* that the government taps
everyone's calls, as do you.
You can stick your phony concern that the leaks were "illegal" right
back up your blackshirt ass. The leaks of the DNC and Podesta e-mails
were *equally* illegal, but Trumpolini and you blackshirts just loved
those. You don't get to pick and choose which "illegal" leaks are good
and which are bad, bitch.
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:10:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
I answered it. It is very clear above whom I am quoting saying “The big
problem I see here is that you have an American citizen who had his
phone calls recorded.” You don't even need to see it again - you know
who said it. *That* is what he said is "the big problem," even though
he's lying because he actually *likes* that the government taps
everyone's calls, as do you.
You can stick your phony concern that the leaks were "illegal" right
back up your blackshirt ass. The leaks of the DNC and Podesta e-mails
were *equally* illegal, but Trumpolini and you blackshirts just loved
those. You don't get to pick and choose which "illegal" leaks are good
and which are bad, bitch.
Dänk 42Ø
Feb 21, 2017, 1:46:43 AM2/21/17
to
knowing about it for at least three weeks before firing him amounts
to a Watergate-style cover-up for So-Called President Trump.
On a related note, the spokesman for the National Security Council, a
longtime CIA analyst, just quit in disgust. No mention of it on
Breitbart, but can be found on numerous Fake News sites like:
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/320384-ex-cia-analyst-speaks-out-about-why-he-resigned-because-of-the-trump
Rudy Canoza
Feb 21, 2017, 4:36:39 AM2/21/17
to
On 2/20/2017 10:46 PM, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
> On 02/18/2017 05:33 AM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
>> Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>>
>>> Diplomats expect to be eavesdropped, which is why they use encryption.
>>> It sounds like Flynn made an UNENCRYPTED call to the Russian embassy,
>>> which at least makes the scandal less worse than had the phone call been
>>> encrypted.
>>
>> You really can't encrypt telephone conversations unless -both-
>> telephones are using the same security system*. Somehow I seriously
>> doubt the telephones at the Russian embassy and Flynn's phone utilized a
>> common system.
>>
>> *Well you can encrypt a telephone conversation but unless the guy on the
>> other end of the phone call is using the same security system, all he
>> will hear is a series of clicks, whistles, and white noise.
>>
>>> Still, under the Logan Act, his phone calls amount to a
>>> violation of the Logan Act, since he was a private citizen at the time.
>>
>> The Logan Act allegation is pretty shaky. I doubt it would fly in court.
>
> But his lying about it when interviewed for the job is a crime.
It probably isn't a crime. He already *had* the job; he wasn't
> On 02/18/2017 05:33 AM, Bill Shatzer wrote:
>> Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>>
>>> Diplomats expect to be eavesdropped, which is why they use encryption.
>>> It sounds like Flynn made an UNENCRYPTED call to the Russian embassy,
>>> which at least makes the scandal less worse than had the phone call been
>>> encrypted.
>>
>> You really can't encrypt telephone conversations unless -both-
>> telephones are using the same security system*. Somehow I seriously
>> doubt the telephones at the Russian embassy and Flynn's phone utilized a
>> common system.
>>
>> *Well you can encrypt a telephone conversation but unless the guy on the
>> other end of the phone call is using the same security system, all he
>> will hear is a series of clicks, whistles, and white noise.
>>
>>> Still, under the Logan Act, his phone calls amount to a
>>> violation of the Logan Act, since he was a private citizen at the time.
>>
>> The Logan Act allegation is pretty shaky. I doubt it would fly in court.
>
> But his lying about it when interviewed for the job is a crime.
interviewing for it. It was just something that was going to make him
toxic when it eventually came to light.
Rudy Canoza
Feb 21, 2017, 11:02:30 AM2/21/17
to
On 2/21/2017 3:28 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody lied:
> The big problem is that the law has been broken here
That's not what that fucking blackshirt Nunes said. In addition, you
don't believe that's a problem at all, because you weren't calling it a
problem when the DNC and Podesta e-mails were stolen and leaked.
No, you don't think it's a problem when it helps your corrupt side.
>> You can stick your phony concern that the leaks were "illegal" right
>> back up your blackshirt ass. The leaks of the DNC and Podesta e-mails
>> were *equally* illegal, but Trumpolini and you blackshirts just loved
>> those. You don't get to pick and choose which "illegal" leaks are good
>> and which are bad, bitch.
>
> My hypocrisy is so noted.
And Trumpolini's, too.
That's not what that fucking blackshirt Nunes said. In addition, you
don't believe that's a problem at all, because you weren't calling it a
problem when the DNC and Podesta e-mails were stolen and leaked.
No, you don't think it's a problem when it helps your corrupt side.
>> You can stick your phony concern that the leaks were "illegal" right
>> back up your blackshirt ass. The leaks of the DNC and Podesta e-mails
>> were *equally* illegal, but Trumpolini and you blackshirts just loved
>> those. You don't get to pick and choose which "illegal" leaks are good
>> and which are bad, bitch.
>
And Trumpolini's, too.
Rudy Canoza
Feb 22, 2017, 10:26:33 AM2/22/17
to
On 2/22/2017 3:27 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody lied:
> You're dodging once more.
I'm not. You *aren't* troubled by the illegality of leaking. You're
only pissy because your Duce, Trumpolini, was badly damaged by it. In
fact, you're the one dodging. It's settled.
I'm not. You *aren't* troubled by the illegality of leaking. You're
only pissy because your Duce, Trumpolini, was badly damaged by it. In
fact, you're the one dodging. It's settled.
Rudy Canoza
Feb 23, 2017, 11:22:36 AM2/23/17
to
On 2/23/2017 3:23 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
blackshirt lied:
> Youi don't know what "troubles" me
I something that doesn't trouble "youi" [sic], and that's the illegality
of leaking, not to mention the leaking itself. All the leaking of DNC
and Podesta e-mails during the campaign delighted you, even though the
acquisition of the material was illegal.
You're a fucking hypocritical blackshirt. You have no shame.
blackshirt lied:
I something that doesn't trouble "youi" [sic], and that's the illegality
of leaking, not to mention the leaking itself. All the leaking of DNC
and Podesta e-mails during the campaign delighted you, even though the
acquisition of the material was illegal.
You're a fucking hypocritical blackshirt. You have no shame.
Rudy Canoza
Feb 24, 2017, 11:30:11 AM2/24/17
to
On 2/24/2017 3:36 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt
nobody lied:
>> I know something that doesn't trouble "youi" [sic], and that's the illegality
Not at all. I know without doubt - we all do - that you weren't
troubled in the least by the illegality of the hacking and leaking of
the DNC and Podesta e-mails. If stealing and leaking hurts your Duce,
then you're against it. If it helps the pathetic weakling, then you're
for it. That's what we know.
nobody lied:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:22:13 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>
>> On 2/23/2017 3:23 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
>> blackshirt lied:
>>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:26:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/22/2017 3:27 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody lied:
>
>> On 2/23/2017 3:23 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
>> blackshirt lied:
>>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:26:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:02:11 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/21/2017 3:28 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody lied:
>>>>>
>> of leaking, not to mention the leaking itself. All the leaking of DNC
>> and Podesta e-mails during the campaign delighted you, even though the
>> acquisition of the material was illegal.
>>
>
> And you're dodging again.
>> and Podesta e-mails during the campaign delighted you, even though the
>> acquisition of the material was illegal.
>>
>
Not at all. I know without doubt - we all do - that you weren't
troubled in the least by the illegality of the hacking and leaking of
the DNC and Podesta e-mails. If stealing and leaking hurts your Duce,
then you're against it. If it helps the pathetic weakling, then you're
for it. That's what we know.
Rudy Canoza
Feb 28, 2017, 12:39:57 PM2/28/17
to
On 2/25/2017 6:06 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* nobody
blackshirt lied:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:29:46 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
> You're always pretending to know what I think
No, I'm not pretending - I really do know. You are 100% predictable.
blackshirt lied:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:29:46 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
No, I'm not pretending - I really do know. You are 100% predictable.
Rudy Canoza
Mar 1, 2017, 1:22:14 PM3/1/17
to
[followups vandalism by *registered sex offender* repaired]
On 3/1/2017 4:32 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt
nobody and registered sex offender lied:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:39:22 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/25/2017 6:06 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
> And yet you never seem to get it right
I get it right *every* time.
It's a settled fact: you aren't troubled in the least by the
"illegality" of any leaks. It is only the target of the leaks that
concerns. When it's your child-raping hero Trumpolini, then you don't
like the leaks. When it's the rapist's opponent, then you like them.
This is not in dispute.
On 3/1/2017 4:32 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt
nobody and registered sex offender lied:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 09:39:22 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/25/2017 6:06 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>> On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:29:46 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/24/2017 3:36 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:22:13 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/23/2017 3:23 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:26:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/22/2017 3:27 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:02:11 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/21/2017 3:28 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 12:39:39 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/20/2017 3:35 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:10:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2017 6:12 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:03:19 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2017 6:44 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 23:49:27 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/17/2017 7:25 PM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:45:27 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/17/2017 3:37 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:48:03 -0800, Rudy Canoza <c...@philhendrie.con>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/16/2017 3:45 AM, a fucking shit-4-braincell *wage slave* blackshirt nobody and registered sex offender lied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I get it right *every* time.
It's a settled fact: you aren't troubled in the least by the
"illegality" of any leaks. It is only the target of the leaks that
concerns. When it's your child-raping hero Trumpolini, then you don't
like the leaks. When it's the rapist's opponent, then you like them.
This is not in dispute.
0 new messages