Re: Half of America wants Obama impeached - Even Democrats join surge of dissatisfaction in unprecedented numbers - Can you say, "Mid-term shellactifucation??"

[Rod]

On 5/19/2013 2:34 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 13:57:38 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> 7/11.nig wrote:
>
>> Half of America wants Obama impeached
>
> Half of american nuts, you mean.


You have just established yourself as a major player
among the extremist head cases in the US. Anyone
who disagrees with your agenda or your racial view
is automatically slandered and defamed.

You're a piss poor human being, Gary.



>
>
>
>> ====================================================================
>
>
> COMPARE THIS:
>
>> PETE DuPONT, GOPAC Founder: When he began the campaign with GOPAC, the
>> serious part of building to a majority, he said, "The first thing
>> we've got to do is we all got to use the same language. We've got to
>> start talking about"_ and Newt said this hundreds of times_ "start
>> talking about a conservative opportunity society replacing the liberal
>> Welfare state." And he'd say, "Bang that language into your head. Use
>> it every night. Use the same words and pretty soon it will permeate to
>> the American people." And that was the right strategy.
>
>
> WITH THIS:
>
>
>> "The great masses' receptive ability is only very limited, their understanding
>> is small, but their forgetfullness is great. As a consequence
>> of these facts, all effective propagana has to limit itself only to a
>> very few points and use them like slogans until even the very last man
>> is able to imagine what is intended by such a word.
>
>> Adolph Hitler
>> Mein Kampf

[opel]

On 5/19/2013 3:10 PM, Rod wrote:
> On 5/19/2013 2:34 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 13:57:38 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>> 7/11.nig wrote:
>>
>>> Half of America wants Obama impeached
>>
>> Half of american nuts, you mean.
>
>
> You have just established yourself as a major player
> among the extremist head cases in the US. Anyone
> who disagrees with your agenda or your racial view
> is automatically slandered and defamed.
>
> You're a piss poor human being, Gary.

Eloquently stated, sir.

[Rod]

On 5/19/2013 4:45 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> On Sun, 19 May 2013 16:10:52 -0500, Rod <nhra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/19/2013 2:34 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>> On Sun, 19 May 2013 13:57:38 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>>> 7/11.nig wrote:
>>>
>>>> Half of America wants Obama impeached
>>>
>>> Half of american nuts, you mean.
>>
>>
>> You have just established yourself as a major player
>> among the extremist head cases in the US. Anyone
>> who disagrees with your agenda or your racial view
>> is automatically slandered and defamed.
>

> Sorry, but I use their posts as evidence of their racist views, and
> those who support them.
>
> Either you're too fucking stupid to understand what WaterGate was, the
> investigation of who did what, and the incontrovertible evidence that
> NO ONE could defend against (leading to Nixon resigning)---and the
> total lack of acceptance that ALL of the allegations against Clinton
> had NO supporting evidence (at all), would now accept ANOTHER set of
> vacuous crap as being "impeachable"---has got to be the stupidest
> self-evidence of no intellect.
>
> NONE of the present crap has any credible foundation other than some
> obscure "event" that only qualifies for rightwing farting.
>


uh huh...yeah...and the democratic party didn't attempt to recruit
non citizen mexicans in florida to vote under deceased peoples names..

the democratic party is playing you for a fool, and it's working.

[Slackjaw]

opel wrote:

> On 5/19/2013 3:10 PM, Rod wrote:
> > On 5/19/2013 2:34 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> > > On Sun, 19 May 2013 13:57:38 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> > > 7/11.nig wrote:
> > >
> > > > Half of America wants Obama impeached
> > >
> > > Half of american nuts, you mean.
> >
> >
> > You have just established yourself as a major player
> > among the extremist head cases in the US. Anyone
> > who disagrees with your agenda or your racial view
> > is automatically slandered and defamed.
> >
> > You're a piss poor human being, Gary.
>
>
> Eloquently stated, sir.

Gary has the mental development of a six-year-old.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > ================================================================

> > > > ====
> > >
> > >
> >> COMPARE THIS:
> > >
> > > > PETE DuPONT, GOPAC Founder: When he began the campaign with
> > > > GOPAC, the serious part of building to a majority, he said,
> > > > "The first thing we've got to do is we all got to use the same
> > > > language. We've got to start talking about"_ and Newt said this
> > > > hundreds of times_ "start talking about a conservative
> > > > opportunity society replacing the liberal Welfare state." And
> > > > he'd say, "Bang that language into your head. Use it every
> > > > night. Use the same words and pretty soon it will permeate to
> > > > the American people." And that was the right strategy.
> > >
> > >
> > > WITH THIS:
> > >
> > >
> > > > "The great masses' receptive ability is only very limited, their
> > > > understanding
> > > > is small, but their forgetfullness is great. As a consequence
> > > > of these facts, all effective propagana has to limit itself
> > > > only to a very few points and use them like slogans until even
> > > > the very last man is able to imagine what is intended by such a
> > > > word.
> > >
> >>> Adolph Hitler
> >>> Mein Kampf
> >

--
---
Truth is the cure for liberalism.
---

[Gronk]

Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @ 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> Half of America wants Obama impeached
>

> Even Democrats join surge of dissatisfaction in unprecedented numbers
> Published: 1 hour ago
> Bob Unruh
>
> �It may be early in the process for members of Congress to start
> planning for impeachment of Barack Obama, but the American public is
> building a serious appetite for it,� said Fritz Wenzel, of Wenzel
> Strategies, which did the telephone poll Thursday. It has a margin of
> error of 4.36 percent.
>
> �Half or nearly half of those surveyed said they believed Obama should
> be impeached for the trifecta of scandals now consuming Washington.�
>
> Actually, on the issue of the Benghazi scandal, where four Americans
> were killed when in what may have been a politically motivated series
> of moves, a surging danger to Americans at the foreign service
> facility there was ignored until al-Qaida-linked terrorists attacked,
> 50.1 percent of Americans said Obama should be impeached. That
> included 27.6 percent of the responding Democrats.
>
> On the scandal of the Internal Revenue Service intentionally harassing
> conservative and Christian organizations? Forty-nine percent said they
> agree that impeachment is appropriate, including 24.4 percent of the
> Democrats.
>
> And on the fishing trip the Obama administration took into AP
> reporters� telephone records in search of something that may well have
> been done by his own administration, 48.6 percent impeachment is
> appropriate. That included 26.1 percent of the Democrats.
>
> Sign the petition urging Congress to impeach Obama.
>
> It was only two months ago that respondents to the same poll
> suggested, although in smaller numbers, that impeachment was
> appropriate for other Obama scandals. At that time 44 percent said he
> should be impeached for his campaign to give amnesty to illegal aliens
> inside the U.S., and 46 percent said he should be impeached for
> launching the war to remove Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi.
>
> �What is clear from the data is that Obama is at risk of losing his
> base,� Wenzel explained. �On each of these questions, about one in
> four Democrats said they agreed Obama should be impeached. What could
> be more alarming to the White House is that it appears that most of
> American is tuned in to these issues now, as 93 percent of registered
> voters said they get at least one news update on these issues every
> day.�
>
> He continued, �Of the three issues now in the news, the one that has
> been there the longest, and the only one that has to do with the death
> of American citizens, is seen as the most important to Americans.
> While 49 percent said the Benghazi murders of U.S. diplomatic
> personnel is the most serious issue, 26 percent said IRS harassment
> was most serious, and 25 percent said the seizure of AP phone records
> was most serious. With news still breaking on all three fronts, it is
> impossible to know which of the three scandals will ultimately be the
> most damaging to the Obama administration. These findings clearly show
> Americans are concerned about what is going on in Washington.�
>
> It spells headwinds for Obama, too, as he lobbies American voters to
> grant him his wish of having a Democrat Congress during the last two
> years of his reign, Wenzel said.
>
> �What could be most concerning to the White House is that the
> Democratic Party effort to retake the U.S. House of Representatives
> next year may be at risk because of these issues. Asked whether they
> would lean to vote for the Democrat or the Republican in their own
> congressional district based on what they know about these three
> situations, 46 percent said they would lean toward voting for the
> Republican, while 39 percent said they would lean toward voting for
> the Democrat. Another 16 percent said these issues make no difference
> in their congressional vote,� Wenzel said.
>
> He said, �The appetite is growing for impeachment proceedings. It is
> too early to say it is time for those proceedings to start, but it�s
> now possible to see that day on the far horizon.�
>
> Of those who did not vote in 2012, based on their knowledge of Obama�s
> administration now, 37 percent say they would have gone back to vote
> for Republican Mitt Romney, 27 percent for Obama, and others
> undecided.
>
> That the situation is serious for Obama was confirmed by former Reagan
> speechwriter Peggy Noonan.
>
> �We are in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate.
> The reputation of the Obama White House has, among conservatives, gone
> from sketchy to sinister, and, among liberals, from unsatisfying to
> dangerous. No one likes what they�re seeing. The Justice Department
> assault on the Associated Press and the ugly politicization of the
> Internal Revenue Service have left the administration�s credibility
> deeply, probably irretrievably damaged. They don�t look jerky now,
> they look dirty. The patina of high-mindedness the president enjoyed
> is gone,� she said.
>
> �The president, as usual, acts as if all of this is totally
> unconnected to him. He�s shocked, it�s unacceptable, he�ll get to the
> bottom of it. He read about it in the papers, just like you. But he is
> not unconnected, he is not a bystander. This is his administration.
> Those are his executive agencies. He runs the IRS and the Justice
> Department,� she continued. �A president sets a mood, a tone. He
> establishes an atmosphere. If he is arrogant, arrogance spreads. If he
> is too partisan, too disrespecting of political adversaries, that
> spreads too. Presidents always undo themselves and then blame it on
> the third guy in the last row in the sleepy agency across town.�
>
> It�s even being compared to Watergate, that breakin episode that
> ultimately led to the resignation of President Richard M. Nixon.
>
> That was confirmed by no less than Bob Woodward of the Washington
> Post, whose reporting on Watergate eventually snared the sitting
> president.
>
> Woodward said recently, �If you read through all these emails, you see
> that everyone in the government is saying, �Oh, let�s not tell the
> public that terrorists were involved, people connected to al Qaeda.
> Let�s not tell the public that there were warnings.� And I have to go
> back 40 years to Watergate when Nixon put out his edited transcripts
> to the conversations, and he personally went through them and said,
> �Oh, let�s not tell this, let�s not show this.� I would not dismiss
> Benghazi. It�s a very serious issue.�
>
> A Republican congressman recently brought up the subject.
>
> �I would say yes. I�m not willing to take it [impeachment] off to take
> it off the table, but that�s certainly not what we�re striving for,�
> Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told CNN.
>
> �We want truth, we want to bring the people who perpetrated the
> terrorism in Benghazi to be brought to justice, and we want to have
> the president do what he has said he would always do. And that is be
> open and transparent. Thus far, the White House has not done that.�
>
> Read more at:
> http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/half-of-america-wants-obama-impeached/
>
> CB
> Can you say, "Mid-term shellactifucation??"
>

[Robert A. Leffingwell]

"Gronk" <inv...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:kno6qu$o6h$1...@news.mixmin.net...

>>
>> Even Democrats join surge of dissatisfaction in unprecedented numbers
>> Published: 1 hour ago
>> Bob Unruh

Unruh is just another opportunist looking to make a quick buck from low-IQ
birthers. He knows how stupid the birthers and teabaggers are and just like
Beck who made millions selling them overpriced gold coins, Unruh is looking
to make big bucks selling more conspiracy theories.

In a way we should honor Unruh. He gets money into circulation which in
general is good for a struggling economy. What's bad is that the money is
coming from idiots who really need the money.