On 11/16/2017 1:37 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
> On 2017-11-16 12:28 PM, wulfenite wrote:
>> On 11/16/2017 10:24 AM, Alan Baker wrote:
>>> On 2017-11-16 7:30 AM, wulfenite wrote:
>>>> On 11/15/2017 9:16 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
>>>>> Clinton didn't authorize this deal by herself.
>>>>
>>>> Wow, contortions all to protect a corrupt dumpling!
>>>
>>> Nope. That's a FACT. CFIUS unanimously approved the deal; 9 different
>>> US government agencies
>>
>> BULLSHIT partisan BUREAUCRACY is NO excuse!
>
> Sorry, but it proves that Clinton couldn't have made this deal pass no
> matter how much money her foundation received.
Nope.
‘The FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry
officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money
laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business
inside the United States,” The Hill’s John Solomon and Alison Spann
report. They add that an eyewitness, with corroborating documents,
indicates that, starting in 2009, “Russian nuclear officials had routed
millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President
Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable
decision to Moscow.”
Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452941/clinton-foundation-russian-uranium-scandal-media-silence-damning
>>
>>
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2017/1114/What-s-the-real-story-behind-Hillary-Clinton-Russia-and-uranium
>>
>>
>> Q: Did the US government approve the Rosatom purchase?
>>
>> Due to the sensitivity of Rosatom’s investment in Uranium One, the
>> deal had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the
>> United States. This body consists of nine senior US officials,
>> including the secretaries of State, Defense, Treasury, Homeland
>> Security, Commerce, and Energy, the attorney general, and two White
>> House representatives. They unanimously OK’d the transaction in 2010.
>>
>> Under the Treasury Department regulations that established the
>> Committee on Foreign Investments, it can either approve a deal or
>> recommend that it be blocked. The power to actually stop a sale rests
>> in the Oval Office, according to the regulations. Only the president –
>> in this case, President Obama – has the authority to suspend or
>> prohibit a covered transaction.
>
> Right.
Yes, another Obummer dagger in the heart of America.
>
> So you've just confirmed what I said.
Oh, are you an Obummer hater too?
Again:
‘The FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry
officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money
laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business
inside the United States,” The Hill’s John Solomon and Alison Spann
report. They add that an eyewitness, with corroborating documents,
indicates that, starting in 2009, “Russian nuclear officials had routed
millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President
Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable
decision to Moscow.”
Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452941/clinton-foundation-russian-uranium-scandal-media-silence-damning
> The sale wasn't "20 percent of US uranium supplies: it was the sale of a
> controlling interest in a company that controlled 20% of the PRODUCTION
> capacity. And any export of uranium was specifically prohibited.
>
>>
>> The sale was greased by $145 million in contributions to the Clinton
>> Foundation from Canadian executives who benefited from the sale,
>> according to these allegations.
>
> Factually incorrect: the vast majority of the contributions were made by
> an individual who benefited not at all from the sale, and made the the
> contributions 18 months before Clinton became SoS.
Wrong:
‘The FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry
officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money
laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business
inside the United States,” The Hill’s John Solomon and Alison Spann
report. They add that an eyewitness, with corroborating documents,
indicates that, starting in 2009, “Russian nuclear officials had routed
millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President
Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable
decision to Moscow.”
Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452941/clinton-foundation-russian-uranium-scandal-media-silence-damning
>>
>> In 2010, Rosatom, a state-controlled agency that runs all aspects of
>> Russian nuclear power, purchased a controlling interest in a Canadian
>> mining company named Uranium One. This firm then owned, and still
>> owns, uranium mining rights in the United States.
>
> That is correct... ...except for getting the date wrong.
‘The FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry
officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money
laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business
inside the United States,” The Hill’s John Solomon and Alison Spann
report. They add that an eyewitness, with corroborating documents,
indicates that, starting in 2009, “Russian nuclear officials had routed
millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President
Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable
decision to Moscow.”
Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452941/clinton-foundation-russian-uranium-scandal-media-silence-damning
>>
>> At the time, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission noted that amount of
>> American uranium involved equaled about 20 percent of the “in-situ
>> recovery production capacity” in the country. Since then, the opening
>> of new capacity by other firms has reduced that figure to about 10
>> percent, according to a lengthy investigation of Uranium One assets by
>> The Washington Post. And the US is far from the Saudi Arabia of
>> uranium – in 2016, the US accounted for about 2 percent of world
>> uranium extraction.
>
> Disproving the earlier statement about "uranium supplies".
Semantic gish gallop.
>>
>> Q: Where do contributions to the Clinton Foundation come in?
>>
>> The Clinton Foundation received $145 million in pledges and donations
>> from original investors in Uranium One, prior to its sale to Rosatom.
>> Furthermore, these donations were not disclosed at the time they were
>> made, according to a 2015 story in the New York Times. (The Times
>> story was based in part on research by Peter Schweizer, a former
>> fellow at a conservative think tank and author of the controversial
>> 2015 book “Clinton Cash.”)
>
> Neglecting to mention that most of it came from someone who had no stake
> in Uranium One when he made the donation.
Wrong.
Rosatom announced its acquisition plans on June 8, 2010. While Hillary
weighed this deal, Bill scored $500,000 for his address that June 29 to
Renaissance Capital, a Kremlin-tied bank that endorsed Rosatom’s move.
Before, during, and after CFIUS’s deliberations, nine Uranium One
investors gave the Clinton Foundation some $145 million. Ultimately,
CFIUS approved the Kremlin’s transaction, on October 23, 2010. Moscow’s
funny money spanned continents, according to Circa.com’s Sara Carter. As
she reported: The bribery schemes included delivering thousands of
dollars in yellow envelopes, laundering tens of thousands of dollars in
briefcases or wiring thousands of dollars through shell companies
through the Seychelles Islands, Latvia, Cyprus, and Switzerland, to name
a few. Even worse, despite lacking an export license, Uranium One
reportedly shipped uranium out of America. Destination: Unknown.
Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452941/clinton-foundation-russian-uranium-scandal-media-silence-damning
>>
>> Former President Bill Clinton also received $500,000 for speaking at a
>> Moscow conference organized by a Russian investment bank after the
>> Rosatom-Uranium One deal was announced, but before it passed muster
>> with the US Committee on Foreign Investments, according to the Times
>> story.
>
> Which is moot (look it up) because the decision wasn't Hillary Clinton's
> to make.
You LIE again!
Again:
‘The FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry
officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money
laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business
inside the United States,” The Hill’s John Solomon and Alison Spann
report. They add that an eyewitness, with corroborating documents,
indicates that, starting in 2009, “Russian nuclear officials had routed
millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President
Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable
decision to Moscow.”
Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452941/clinton-foundation-russian-uranium-scandal-media-silence-damning
>>
>> Most of the $145 million in Clinton Foundation donations came from one
>> person, a major Uranium One investor named Frank Giustra. Mr. Giustra
>> has said that he sold all his shares in Uranium One about 1-1/2 years
>> before Mrs. Clinton became secretary of State – and three years before
>> Rosatom and its Russian cash came calling.
>
> Exactly.
Again:
‘The FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry
officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money
laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business
inside the United States,” The Hill’s John Solomon and Alison Spann
report. They add that an eyewitness, with corroborating documents,
indicates that, starting in 2009, “Russian nuclear officials had routed
millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President
Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable
decision to Moscow.”
Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452941/clinton-foundation-russian-uranium-scandal-media-silence-damning
>
>>
>>
>>
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/hillary-clinton-uranium-one-deal-russia-explainer-244895
>>
>>
>> Connections between Clinton Foundation donors and Uranium One were
>> first published in 2015 by The New York Times, which based its
>> reporting in part on the book “Clinton Cash,” by Breitbart News senior
>> editor-at-large Peter Schweizer.
>>
>> The allegations resurfaced last October, when The Hill reported that
>> the FBI was investigating Kremlin “bribery, kickbacks, extortion and
>> money laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy
>> business inside the United States.”
>>
>>
https://www.clintonfoundation.org/contributors
>>
>> Donation Amount
>> Greater than $25,000,000
>>
>> Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 records.
>> Donor name
>> Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
>> Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada)
>> Fred Eychaner and Alphawood Foundation
>> Frank Giustra, The Radcliffe Foundation
>> Nationale Postcode Loterij
>> The Children's Investment Fund Foundation
>> UNITAID
>
Again:
‘The FBI had gathered substantial evidence that Russian nuclear industry
officials were engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money
laundering designed to grow Vladimir Putin’s atomic energy business
inside the United States,” The Hill’s John Solomon and Alison Spann
report. They add that an eyewitness, with corroborating documents,
indicates that, starting in 2009, “Russian nuclear officials had routed
millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President
Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable
decision to Moscow.”
Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452941/clinton-foundation-russian-uranium-scandal-media-silence-damning
Even worse, despite lacking an export license, Uranium One reportedly
shipped uranium out of America. Destination: Unknown. Remember: Uranium
is a main ingredient in atomic bombs. Why would the Obama-Clinton
administration let Russia have even a firecracker’s worth of American
uranium? This is the $145 million question.
Read more at:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/452941/clinton-foundation-russian-uranium-scandal-media-silence-damning