Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

LOL... Fact-Checker "mediabiasfactcheck.com" - 1.8 Stars By their OWN Subscribers

7 views
Skip to first unread message

AlleyCat

unread,
Jul 24, 2022, 11:57:17 PM7/24/22
to

Rudy's Using The ONE "Fact-Checker" Site, That Their Own Users Rate As Liars -
Consumer Rating: 1.8*

Poor Rudy... finds ONE fact-check site, out of 1000s, and they're more corrupt
than The New York Times.

Amateur Site Masquerading as a Reputable Fact-Checking Service
December 17th, 2020

Discounted and dismissed by real fact-checking outfits like Poynter,
Mediabiasfactcheck is a small group of amateurs pretending - with varying
degrees of success - to be a fact-checking site.

THIS is Rudy's "go to" website. Why? Because they're the ONLY "fact-checker"
who says ANYTHING about Electroverse (and now WattsUpWithThat), because no one
else has anything bad to say about them, other than the climate screechers who
are trying to appease Joe Biden and the Democrat Party.

Rudy takes THESE guys seriously? Well... that's apropos, since Rudy IS a
fucking psycho.


mediabiasfactcheck:

A fake news (fact-checker) site.

It sure is. Who made THEM an authority on what THEY think is fact or fiction...
they can't even get a majority of their own users to agree with them.

Media Bias/Fact Check Has A Consumer Rating of 1.8 Stars - Sounds like Yet
ANOTHER "Fact-Check" Site, Which Labels Anything "False", If They Don't Agree
With The Story

Fucking idiot... you found the first, (turns out, the ONLY) "fact-checker",
who's as brainwashed as you, and is on board with the rest of you loons,
regarding "global warming/climate change", and is biased against Electroverse
(and now WattsUpWithThat), and you posted THEIR bullshit SUBjectivity.

Kudos... freak.

=====

Media Bias/Fact Check has a consumer rating of 1.8 stars indicating that most
customers are generally dissatisfied.

1.8 stars?!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Media Bias/Fact Check ranks 313th among Blog sites.

313th. LOL

Questions and comments:

How would you rate Media Bias/Fact Check?

Don't trust Fact checkers, ESPECIALLY THIS ONE. It FAVORS FAKE NEWS on the
left, and to true sites that are not on the mainstream media, it labels as
conspiracy theory and junk pseudo science, when the truth is just the opposite.

This website is as biased and as full of lies as you get.

=====

Top Comments:

"I read a few of their so-called "Facts" and found they are not facts at all,
but rather blatant lies. That's right, LIES! I Probably won't look into it, but
would be interesting to know who is funding them."

"Amateur Site Masquerading as a Reputable Fact-Checking Service"

=====

PUSHES MAINSTREAM MEDIA, AND FAVORS FAKE NEWS
October 2nd, 2020

LIARS - February 11th, 2021

=====

Some fact check resource... NOT!

I was recently doing some research online, when I noticed mediafactcheck.com.

I read a few of their so-called "Facts" and found they are not facts at all,
but rather blatant lies. That's right, LIES! I Probably won't look into it, but
would be interesting to know who is funding them.

=====

As Biased As They Come

May 9th, 2020

Media Bias Fact Check is supposed to give "objective" ratings to news sites.

Well, I did a little experiment. At random, I checked out 10 sources that they
rated at one end of the political spectrum. We'll call this Set A. Then I
checked out 10 sources they rated to be at the OPPOSITE end of the spectrum,
which we'll call Set B.

For Set A, they listed all the sources as "mostly factual" or "highly factual."

For Set B, however, they listed all the sources as "mixed" (meaning having
"mixed" factual content).

Does that sound "objective" to you? And could their OWN bias not be any more
obvious?

This site appears to be a total joke.

=====

Amateur Site Masquerading as a Reputable Fact-Checking Service
December 17th, 2020

Discounted and dismissed by real fact-checking outfits like Poynter,
Mediabiasfactcheck is a small group of amateurs pretending - with varying
degrees of success - to be a fact-checking site.

=====

AlleyCat is one of the several people who dominate Rudy on an almost
daily basis, keeping their bootheels on his little pencil neck to the
amusement of all.

Internet Trolls Are Narcissists, Psychopaths And Sadists, Says Study

Hartung, and the other conservatives here, aren't trolls... it's you and your
fella left wingers.

In an issue of Personality and Individual Differences, a study was published
that confirms what we all suspected:

INTERNET TROLLS ARE HORRIBLE PEOPLE.

Let's start by getting our definitions straight. They are both similar, but
they do have their differences.

An Internet troll is someone who comes into a discussion and posts comments
designed to upset or disrupt the conversation.

=====

(irony snipped)

"Fuck off, David. Just fuck off with your stupid posts. You've already
admitted you don't post to stimulate debate. Fuck off with your stupid fucking
fake questions."

There was NO reason to post this, unless you are a troll.

=====

Often, in fact, it seems like there is no real purpose behind their comments
except to upset everyone else involved.

(BINGO!)

Trolls will lie, exaggerate, and offend to get a response.

DING DING DING... we have a winner.

https://i.imgur.com/EgjtI2B.mp4

They will say and do almost anything to get you as angry as they are. A
response is what both are looking for.

What kind of person would do this and is there a method for how to stop
internet trolls? Some Canadian researchers decided to find out.

They conducted two online studies with over 1,200 people, giving personality
tests to each subject along with a survey about their Internet commenting
behavior. They were looking for evidence that linked trolling with the "Dark
Tetrad" of personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and
sadism.

They found that Dark Tetrad scores were highest among people who said trolling
was their favorite Internet activity. To get an idea of how much more prevalent
these traits were among Internet trolls, see this figure from the paper.

Look at how low the Dark Tetrad scores are for everyone except the trolls!
Their scores for all four traits soar on the chart. The relationship between
trolling and the Dark Tetrad is so significant that the authors write in their
paper: "...the associations between sadism and GAIT (Global Assessment of
Internet Trolling) scores were so strong that it might be said that online
trolls are prototypical everyday sadists."

Trolls truly enjoy making you feel bad. To quote the authors once more (because
this is a truly quotable article), "Both trolls and sadists feel sadistic glee
at the distress of others. Sadists just want to have fun... and the Internet is
their playground!"

So, if you want to know how to stop Internet trolls, which may seem futile, but
sometimes you have to do the hard work for the sake of your mental health, then
the next time you encounter one online, remember:

These trolls are some truly difficult people.

It is your suffering that brings them pleasure, so the best thing you can do is
ignore them.

The only reason that they seem so vile is because a part of themselves is
hurting, and it has absolutely nothing to do with you.

Knew it.


Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jul 25, 2022, 12:25:55 AM7/25/22
to
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]

On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch aka Neutered Pussy, a
*fucking* Nazi — *NOT* a three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a
golf pro, *NEVER* a lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been
laid, but just a pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing
fairy — *capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:


> On 7/24/2022 8:41 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/
>>
>> It's nothing but a lie site.
>>
>> Conspiracy level: *STRONG*
>> Pseudo-Sci level: *STRONG*
>> Factual reporting: *LOW*
>>
>> https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/watts-up-with-that/
>>
>>
>> It's a lie site. It is bullshit. People who cite it are bullshit.
>> AlleyPussyBitch is bullshit citing bullshit.
>
> Rudy's Using a reliable media bias analysis site.

Yes.

"wattsupwiththat" is a lie site. This is settled.

AlleyCat

unread,
Jul 25, 2022, 12:43:53 AM7/25/22
to

Watch... because he's so neurotic and paranoid, Rudy will reply to this,
because if he doesn't, he can't go to bed and sleep, knowing everyone knows the
truth about Mediabiasfactcheck and Rudy's stupidity for using them.

LOL... he thinks that if he replies to this, in the negative, it erases the OP.

WHAT AN IDIOT.

Oh... and watch him delete "can.politics" for his boyfriends in Canada.

=====

Rudy Canoza

unread,
Jul 25, 2022, 12:51:39 AM7/25/22
to
['can.politics' gratuitous bullshit crosspost removed]

[subject line vandalism by squat-to-piss communist cocksucker repaired]

On every date, the mental defective AlleyPussyBitch aka Neutered Pussy — *NOT* a
three letter athlete, was *NEVER* a bouncer, *NEVER* a golf pro, *NEVER* a
lifeguard, *NEVER* dunked a basketball, and has *NEVER* been laid, but just a
pole-puffing no-fight squat-to-piss shrieking estrogen-oozing fairy —
*capitulated* and *submitted* to Rudy:
>
> On 7/24/2022 9:33 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/
>>
>> It's nothing but a lie site.
>>
>> Conspiracy level: *STRONG*
>> Pseudo-Sci level: *STRONG*
>> Factual reporting: *LOW*
>>
>> https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/watts-up-with-that/
>>
>>
>> It's a lie site. It is bullshit. People who cite it are bullshit.
>> AlleyPussyBitch is bullshit citing bullshit.
>
> Watch...
We did. You lied.
0 new messages