#Argentina, once poster child of Republicans, dissolves into chaos^
kodiak
says...
>
> "Zepp the Weasel" <ze...@snowcrest.net> wrote in message
> news:ca9332ae.01122...@posting.google.com...
>
> > [Argentina] tried to run the country like a corporation.
>
> It is sad that 22 people have died in Argentina.
>
> Let us know when the deaths in Argentina that you blame on
> capitalism reaches the level of the 65 million deaths that your
> Chairman Mao caused in China.
>
You don't want to go there, Nap.
Conservative governments in Argentina have killed tens of
thousands of civilians over the last thirty years or so.
Political abductions.
They simply kidnapped civilians they didn't like, and either shot
them, or flew them out over the Atlantic in Heliocopters and
dumped them alive into the sea.
Then they took the orphan kids and "adopted" them out to
compliant Conservative families. People who believe what you
believe did this, Nap.
===
Chile also did this -- Nixon's Chile, with Pinochet running
things.
... and El Salvador also did this. Reagan's San Salvador. ... and
Reagan helped to put the leader of the Conservative Military
death squads in as President later. Pretty god damned awful.
===
As far as Mao goes, it's a slander and a really gross lie to
claim that any American Liberal supported Mao Tse Tung. Not to
mention, completely incorrect. You _do_ care about holding
factual political beliefs, don't you?
Are you sure you're old enough to post in a political newsgroup?
kk
Nap
"kodiak" <kod...@uak.edu> wrote in message
news:MPG.168f71574...@ca.news.verio.net...
> In article <7_9V7.2297$6p.21063@rwcrnsc54>, an...@nowhere.com
> says...
> >
> > "Zepp the Weasel" <ze...@snowcrest.net> wrote in message
> > news:ca9332ae.01122...@posting.google.com...
> >
> > > [Argentina] tried to run the country like a corporation.
> >
> > It is sad that 22 people have died in Argentina.
> >
> > Let us know when the deaths in Argentina that you blame on
> > capitalism reaches the level of the 65 million deaths that your
> > Chairman Mao caused in China.
> >
>
> You don't want to go there, Nap.
>
> Conservative governments in Argentina have killed tens of
> thousands of civilians over the last thirty years or so.
> Political abductions.
So, your argument is that the Republicans in the United States
are responsible for tens of thousands of civilians killed in Argentia.
Simply because you like to lump people into large groups.
This tendency of yours to fault entire groups because you
happened to lump some wrong doers in with them is
intellectually and morally bankrupt.
My original argument's thesis was that this is a bogus line of
argument, and if your going to do it, it works far better on the
left than on the right. You failed to understand that. No wonder
you use this silly argument.
Zepp the Weasel
> "kodiak" <kod...@uak.edu> wrote in message
> news:MPG.168f71574...@ca.news.verio.net...
> > In article <7_9V7.2297$6p.21063@rwcrnsc54>, an...@nowhere.com
> > says...
> > >
> > > "Zepp the Weasel" <ze...@snowcrest.net> wrote in message
> > > news:ca9332ae.01122...@posting.google.com...
> > >
> > > > [Argentina] tried to run the country like a corporation.
> > >
> > > It is sad that 22 people have died in Argentina.
> > >
> > > Let us know when the deaths in Argentina that you blame on
> > > capitalism reaches the level of the 65 million deaths that your
> > > Chairman Mao caused in China.
> > >
> >
> > You don't want to go there, Nap.
> >
> > Conservative governments in Argentina have killed tens of
> > thousands of civilians over the last thirty years or so.
> > Political abductions.
>
> So, your argument is that the Republicans in the United States
> are responsible for tens of thousands of civilians killed in Argentia.
No, his argument was tha conservative governments in Argentina have
killed tens of thousands of civilians over the last thirty years or
so. He then mentions political abductions. You really need to brush
up on those reading skills.
>
> Simply because you like to lump people into large groups.
When I last looked, you were trying to lump me in with someone you
claim killed 65 million people because I expressed disapproval of an
unregulated free market economy.
>
> This tendency of yours to fault entire groups because you
> happened to lump some wrong doers in with them is
> intellectually and morally bankrupt.
>
[cough]
> My original argument's thesis was that this is a bogus line of
> argument, and if your going to do it, it works far better on the
> left than on the right. You failed to understand that. No wonder
> you use this silly argument.
Are you going to compare him to Stalin and claim Stalin killed 100
million people? Or maybe you could compare him to Idi Amin, and claim
he cannibalized the entire continent of Africa.
Bill Bonde
Zepp the Weasel wrote:
>
> "Nap" <an...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:<JBqV7.6294$8L1.55268@rwcrnsc52>...
> > "kodiak" <kod...@uak.edu> wrote in message
> > news:MPG.168f71574...@ca.news.verio.net...
> > > In article <7_9V7.2297$6p.21063@rwcrnsc54>, an...@nowhere.com
> > > says...
> > > >
> > > > "Zepp the Weasel" <ze...@snowcrest.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:ca9332ae.01122...@posting.google.com...
> > > >
> > > > > [Argentina] tried to run the country like a corporation.
> > > >
> > > > It is sad that 22 people have died in Argentina.
> > > >
> > > > Let us know when the deaths in Argentina that you blame on
> > > > capitalism reaches the level of the 65 million deaths that your
> > > > Chairman Mao caused in China.
> > > >
> > >
> > > You don't want to go there, Nap.
> > >
> > > Conservative governments in Argentina have killed tens of
> > > thousands of civilians over the last thirty years or so.
> > > Political abductions.
> >
> > So, your argument is that the Republicans in the United States
> > are responsible for tens of thousands of civilians killed in Argentia.
>
> No, his argument was tha conservative governments in Argentina have
> killed tens of thousands of civilians over the last thirty years or
> so.
>
So 'conservative governments' are just any governments that aren't
Communist and that the US supports against Communists?
Nap
How does this relate to the republicans in the United States? QED.
> > Simply because you like to lump people into large groups.
>
> When I last looked, you were trying to lump me in with someone you
> claim killed 65 million people because I expressed disapproval of an
> unregulated free market economy.
Yes. And you found the flaw with that argument.
It doesn't appear to stop you from constantly making that argument.
You're completely incapable of objectivity. Thanks for making the
point that left wing liberals are not fair or objective. That was not
the issue here, however.
wolf...@nospamhome.com
wrote:
>"Nap" <an...@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:<JBqV7.6294$8L1.55268@rwcrnsc52>...
>> "kodiak" <kod...@uak.edu> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.168f71574...@ca.news.verio.net...
>> > In article <7_9V7.2297$6p.21063@rwcrnsc54>, an...@nowhere.com
>> > says...
>> > >
>> > > "Zepp the Weasel" <ze...@snowcrest.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:ca9332ae.01122...@posting.google.com...
>> > >
>> > > > [Argentina] tried to run the country like a corporation.
>> > >
>> > > It is sad that 22 people have died in Argentina.
>> > >
>> > > Let us know when the deaths in Argentina that you blame on
>> > > capitalism reaches the level of the 65 million deaths that your
>> > > Chairman Mao caused in China.
>> > >
>> >
>> > You don't want to go there, Nap.
>> >
>> > Conservative governments in Argentina have killed tens of
>> > thousands of civilians over the last thirty years or so.
>> > Political abductions.
>>
>> So, your argument is that the Republicans in the United States
>> are responsible for tens of thousands of civilians killed in Argentia.
>
>No, his argument was tha conservative governments in Argentina have
>killed tens of thousands of civilians over the last thirty years or
>so. He then mentions political abductions. You really need to brush
>up on those reading skills.
But the poster left it to believe that what he was saying, that seems
to be his intent
A separate line that says " Political abductions." does not say
anything , unless you put it with what he wrote just before .
you of all people should know what the "intent" of a person is.