3-11 vs. 9-11
Bushsucks
place EXACTLY six months away from the 9/11 anniversary.
Were Spanish officials asleep at the switch like Bush was on 9-11?
They can thank Bush and their own Bush-bribed leaders, who fell for
the Bush Iraq War - fetching Spain 200+ DEAD, 1500 hurt on 3-11.
Jim Alder
news:405308...@moron.com:
> I'd say that there is some symbolism to the Spain bombings
> taking place EXACTLY six months away from the 9/11
> anniversary.
No one here seems to be mentioning the fact that it was exactly
nine hundred and eleven days AFTER 911. I hope no one thinks that
is a coincidence?
--
"In my humble opinion, the petty carping levied against Bush by
the Democrats proves again, it is better to have your eye plucked
out by an eagle than to be nibbled to death by ducks." - Norman
Liebmann
Patricia Ann Haring
"Bushsucks" <Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote in message
news:405308...@moron.com...
Adam Albright
wrote:
>Bushsucks <Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote in
>news:405308...@moron.com:
>
>> I'd say that there is some symbolism to the Spain bombings
>> taking place EXACTLY six months away from the 9/11
>> anniversary.
>
> No one here seems to be mentioning the fact that it was exactly
>nine hundred and eleven days AFTER 911. I hope no one thinks that
>is a coincidence?
We're in shock you could count that high. I bet your fingers and toes
are really tired.
SteveL
wrote:
>Bushsucks <Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote in
>news:405308...@moron.com:
>
>> I'd say that there is some symbolism to the Spain bombings
>> taking place EXACTLY six months away from the 9/11
>> anniversary.
>
> No one here seems to be mentioning the fact that it was exactly
>nine hundred and eleven days AFTER 911. I hope no one thinks that
>is a coincidence?
It was 912 days not 911. Close but no cigar.
And anyway, "911" is an American term. Many other (perhaps even
*most*) countries go dd-mm not mm-dd.
Now if something had happened after 119 days (or does happen after
1109 days)......
The "six months from Sept 11th" link is more compelling. Perhaps ETA
were mindful of that symbolism.
It's a shame though that the catchpenny US media propaga.., sorry,
Journalism, outlets are still trying to flog the dead horse that it
was Al Qaeda., rather that respect the knowledgable opinion of the
"terrorism experienced" Spanish authorities that it was ETA.
Presumably it was the same media sources who went "well it was NEARLY
911 days, so let's just drop the "nearly".
SteveL
<pa...@nospan.rcn.com> wrote:
>Freaky stat: 911 days after 911.
912.
copertopkiller
"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:FfSdneuGgu3...@giganews.com...
911 between attacks...
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
How do you stop someone from putting backpack bombs in a subway? They
used mobile phones to set them off. How hard is that? Just take the wire
from the speaker, which sends power out when it rings, to your bomb
circuit and you have a remote control bomb.
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Jim Alder wrote:
>
> Bushsucks <Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote in
> news:405308...@moron.com:
>
> > I'd say that there is some symbolism to the Spain bombings
> > taking place EXACTLY six months away from the 9/11
> > anniversary.
>
> No one here seems to be mentioning the fact that it was exactly
> nine hundred and eleven days AFTER 911. I hope no one thinks that
> is a coincidence?
>
It seems unlikely. The choice of 9/11 in the first place, obviously a
possible reference to 911 on a phone, is clearly there too. I think they
do like to use these sorts of dates although trying to figure out the
plan ahead of time is probably impossible.
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
SteveL wrote:
>
> The "six months from Sept 11th" link is more compelling. Perhaps ETA
> were mindful of that symbolism.
>
At least one news programme yesterday talked about an ETA member who had
converted to Islam and trained with bin Laden in Afghanistan. As I've
mentioned before, ETA and the IRA, and the real IRA and FARC are known
to work together. All terrorist organizations are the enemy of free
people everywhere, so whether this is specifically ETA or al Qaeda, all
free people should support finding and destroying the terrorists.
Adam Albright
is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )"
<std...@backpacker.com> wrote:
What a moron! The speaker in a cellphone or mobile phone or any
electronic device for that matter does NOT send out power. Damn Billy,
you are one stupid fuck trying desperately to impress us with what you
know. You keep failing. Because you're just a copy and paste artist
that doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.
Adam Albright
People should support putting village idiots like you in a cage with a
big sign that says "Pay no attention to the freak." and have it
located where the most people can see what a fool you always are.
Just think of the possibilites Billy. Get a tin cup, put it outside
your cage and maybe at the end of the day you would have enough change
to by a newspaper.
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE
overshoot its mark. )"
>Jim Alder wrote:
>> Bushsucks wrote in
>> > I'd say that there is some symbolism to the Spain bombings
>> > taking place EXACTLY six months away from the 9/11
>> > anniversary.
>>
>> No one here seems to be mentioning the fact that it was exactly
>> nine hundred and eleven days AFTER 911. I hope no one thinks that
>> is a coincidence?
>>
>It seems unlikely. The choice of 9/11 in the first place, obviously a
>possible reference to 911 on a phone, is clearly there too. I think they
>do like to use these sorts of dates although trying to figure out the
>plan ahead of time is probably impossible.
" The failure to prevent Sept. 11 was not a failure of intelligence or coordination.
It was a failure of imagination. Even if all the raw intelligence signals had been
shared among the F.B.I., the C.I.A. and the White House, I'm convinced that there
was no one there who would have put them all together, who would have imagined
evil on the scale Osama bin Laden did." -- Thomas Friedman.
Thomas Friedman was WRONG.
there were people who had the facts,
who saw the dots, who raised the warning
because they saw where the trail led and YET did Absolutely Nothing.
" Osama bin Laden was (or is) a unique character. He's a combination of Charles Manson
and Jack Welch — a truly evil, twisted personality, but with the organizational skills of a
top corporate manager, who translated his evil into a global campaign that rocked a
superpower. In some ways, I'm glad that America (outside Hollywood) is not full of
people with bin Laden-like imaginations. One Timothy McVeigh is enough." -- Thomas Friedman
Once again, Thomas Friedman is WRONG,
and WORSE is catering to the erroneous notion
that the Clinton Undead, who to this day continue
to people the positions of power, routinely, daily, and
actively collaborate with the likes of an Evil which staggers
the Joe-Sixpack view of the world, and belies only the obviousness of
the truth, that the popular-villains on foreign shores are nothing compared
to those actively jockeying for the title of Emminent Monster among their own.
Those who know that America will be destroyed NOT by its enemies,
but by those who's job it is to protect it. This *is* Clinton's Bridge.
" Imagining evil of this magnitude simply does not come naturally to the American character,
which is why, even after we are repeatedly confronted with it, we keep reverting to our
natural, naïvely optimistic selves." -- Thomas Friedman.
The greatest folly of all, once again, Thomas Friedman is WRONG.
The mind of Clinton Evil, and those under his sway, know no rest, especially now.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/104ivafk.asp?pg=2
...while conscience allows us to understand ordinary crimes,
it actually blinds us before the most extraordinary ones.
This is WHY Thomas Friedman, Clinton Appologist extrordinare,
is blind to the obviousness of the Truth, that the facts are knowable,
that the inevitable is not only known, but certain senior gov't managers,
in the grandest of grand traditions, are scalping tickets for front row seats.
This is Clinton's Bridge.
Thank YOU! Bill Clinton. Once Again.
For BEING THERE at the Pinnacle of our Civilization to PISS IT ALL AWAY.
Jim Alder
When are you going to fuck off, punk?
Jim Alder
news:FfSdneiGgu2...@giganews.com:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:58:48 -0000, Jim Alder
> <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>
>>Bushsucks <Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote in
>>news:405308...@moron.com:
>>
>>> I'd say that there is some symbolism to the Spain bombings
>>> taking place EXACTLY six months away from the 9/11
>>> anniversary.
>>
>> No one here seems to be mentioning the fact that it was
>> exactly nine hundred and eleven days AFTER 911. I hope
>> no one thinks that is a coincidence?
>
> It was 912 days not 911. Close but no cigar.
>
> And anyway, "911" is an American term. Many other (perhaps
> even *most*) countries go dd-mm not mm-dd.
3/11 happened 911 days after 9/11
Times of India, India - Mar 12, 2004
Terror: 911 days after 9/11
News24, South Africa - Mar 11, 2004
Terror strikes 911 days after September 11
NEWS.com.au, Australia - Mar 12, 2004
Sydney Morning Herald, Australia - 11 hours ago
... Attorney-General Philip Ruddock noted that the attack on
Madrid took place exactly 911 days after the September 11
terrorist attacks in New York and Washington
Railways on terror alert
ic Birmingham.co.uk, UK - 11 hours ago
... Today a BTP spokesman said a review of security had been
launched following the Madrid bombings - which came exactly 911
days after the atrocities in New York
IrishExaminer.com (subscription), Ireland - 18 hours ago
... In a strange coincidence, the attacks on Madrid came exactly
two-and-a-half years, or 911 days, after the terrorist atrocity
against New York and Washington
Calgary Sun, Canada - Mar 12, 2004
... There were 911 days in-between the terror attacks in Madrid
and Sept. 11, 2001
>
> Now if something had happened after 119 days (or does happen
> after 1109 days)......
Anything but what actually is, eh? Interesting denial
technique. Considering the message was aimed as much at the US as
at Spain, to ignore such a thing would be foolish.
> The "six months from Sept 11th" link is more compelling.
> Perhaps ETA were mindful of that symbolism.
Why? Does 'six months' have some significance that 911 does
not?
> It's a shame though that the catchpenny US media propaga..,
> sorry, Journalism, outlets are still trying to flog the dead
> horse that it was Al Qaeda., rather that respect the
> knowledgable opinion of the "terrorism experienced" Spanish
> authorities that it was ETA.
They are considering both.
> Presumably it was the same media sources who went "well it was
> NEARLY 911 days, so let's just drop the "nearly".
If something happened yesterday, has it been TWO days since it
happened? Or one? And how many days are in between?
Jim Alder
wrote in news:4053629E...@backpacker.com:
At this point I was less concerned with predicting and more
with interpreting the message and who it is from.
Adam Albright
wrote:
>
> When are you going to fuck off, punk?
Hey Jimmy, you should get a rubber stamp with that made up.
Bushsucks
its leaders to support his NEEDLESS War on Iraq.
Another 200 dead bodies and 1500 wounded to add to Bush's tally.
Bushsucks
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE
>I thought 9/11 happened on BUSH's watch. Is my calendar wrong?
Could it be that you conveniently forget
that the WTC was first hit under Clinton's watch?
That the permanent alteration of the NY skyline was but a return engagement?
That as Clinton watched, the world was reduced to the state not unlike that of a log
tumbling end over end down the raging rapids, its people reduced to little more than
ants clinging to it for their very lives?
While all the while he continue to proclaim himself Captain!!!
Never a statement more true:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/001/104ivafk.asp?pg=2
...while conscience allows us to understand ordinary crimes,
it actually blinds us before the most extraordinary ones.
But of course,
this is Clinton's Bridge, his legacy,
which he proclaimed to the world,
which continues to be roundly embraced
by the Guilty, the Unworthy, and the Depraved.
"to leave now we would send a message to terrorists
and other potential adversaries around the world that
they can change our policies by killing our people.
It would be open season on Americans."
-- Bill Clinton '93
just before he pulled out of Somalia.
berl...@sympatico.ca
<stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>It's a shame though that the catchpenny US media propaga.., sorry,
>Journalism, outlets are still trying to flog the dead horse that it
>was Al Qaeda., rather that respect the knowledgable opinion of the
>"terrorism experienced" Spanish authorities that it was ETA.
That's where the the subtelties resides. It was made to appear and
either or but I'm sure it comes from Spain's ultraconservatives.
Essentially it is a psyop warning of worst to come in the USA.
The Synarchists at work!
berl...@sympatico.ca
is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )"
>How do you stop someone from putting backpack bombs in a subway? They
>used mobile phones to set them off. How hard is that? Just take the wire
>from the speaker, which sends power out when it rings, to your bomb
>circuit and you have a remote control bomb.
And what entity used it regularly?
Plus the explosive are Spain made.
Jim Alder
news:83g7505cvs7s6gfa3...@4ax.com:
You should just fuck off, punk. Then I won't need one.
SteveL
wrote:
Impressive collection of reports wrongly claiming that Mar 11, 2004 is
911 days after Sept 11, 2001.
Nevertheless it is a simple and easily verifiable arithmetic FACT that
Mar 11 2004 is 912 days after Sept 11, 2001.
I wasn't trying to make a big deal of it, so please don't get in a
huff of "argument from authority" indignation because I dare to go
against what those various austere sources claim.
So please find a julian date calculator on the web before you call me
arrogant or jumped up or stupid for publically denying those sources.
Keep in mind that numbers are numbers, and it doesn't matter who does
the calculating. There is nothing democratic or about it (20 people
claiming that 2+2 is 5 do not outrank one person claiming it's 4).....
(Note that it IS possible to shoehorn 911 into the equation if you
carefully claim that there were "911 days between attacks", but that's
kind of like claiming that today (Sunday) is 6 days after the previous
Sunday because there were 6 days between).
>
>>
>> Now if something had happened after 119 days (or does happen
>> after 1109 days)......
>
> Anything but what actually is, eh? Interesting denial
>technique. Considering the message was aimed as much at the US as
>at Spain, to ignore such a thing would be foolish.
What "denial technique"?? I am perfectly willing to accept that the
terrorists exploited the symbolism of "exactly 6 months between Sept
11th and Mar 11". I'm just not willing to accept the rather subtler
911 days symbolism - especially when that figure is demonstrably
WRONG!!!
>
>> The "six months from Sept 11th" link is more compelling.
>> Perhaps ETA were mindful of that symbolism.
>
> Why? Does 'six months' have some significance that 911 does
>not?
Because it is true and "911 days" is not!!
SHEESH!!!
T.Carr
Typical from the left wing fringe.."Spanish officials were
asleep"..no condemnation of the actual terrorists who committed this
atrocity
T.Carr
Bushsucks
1993 WTC bombers. He didn't start a fuckin' WAR ON ISLAM like Bush-
a war that CREATES and MOTIVATES terrorists.
Clinton handled the Middle East and terrorism PERFECTLY.
The Bush Regime has FUCKED IT UP.
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:
>
Bill Gamelson
Yea, he set bin laden free four times when the Sudanese captured him and
tried to turn him over.
He was probably too busy getting a blow job in the Oval Office to give a
rats ass about bin laden.
>>The Bush Regime has FUCKED IT UP.
Sir, do you even know what the word regime means? It is obvious that you
don't.
It is Clinton who scaled back the military, removing an air base from New
York that left the twin towers defenseless and caused the second tower to be
leveled before two F-16's which were scrambled from Massachusetts after the
first tower was hit was able to intercept.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/530325/posts
Perfect.
Bushsucks
Bin Laden - armed him, subsidized him, gave him the gas chemicals,
AND JOINED HIS FAMILY IN BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS.
Clinton BOMBED him, you Drooling Dipshitz Dimwit.
Bushsucks
I CONDEMN Bush, the Terrorist Creator.
Adam Albright
Another fucking right wing lunantic. Damn, there are so many idiots
that post to this newsgroup!
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE
>You fuckin' IGNORAMUS - Bush 41 and Rumsfeld and Reagan CREATED
>Bin Laden - armed him, subsidized him, gave him the gas chemicals,
>AND JOINED HIS FAMILY IN BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS.
>
Bill Clinton dropped a bomb in the middle of the desert at night
where it was guarenteed to do the least amount of damage
and THEN had the added audacity to come on national TV
and voice his anguish about the existance and harm that
might befall 'innocent' terrorist collaborators {:^D
who might get caught in the crossfire.
He overtly did so by even plagerizing the VERY WORDS
from a scene from the movie: The American President.
http://reason.com/sullum/041499.shtml
As several commentators have observed, Clinton’s account
of his anxiety bore a striking resemblance to a scene from
the 1995 movie The American President.
This is Clinton's Bridge: A Glasnost to Terror
the likes of which the World has never seen.
A Bridge which is NO BRIDGE because it span no River.
A Legacy which is NO LEGACY because it embody no Legitimacy.
A World Safe for Socialism being NO WORLD
because no one's rights are Secure:
Where the Guilty are Rewarded
Where the Innocent are Punished
Where the Depraved, the Mediocre and Unworthy are
Championed on the basis of their Depravity.
To think!
The Pointy headed Liberals to this day hesitate to
embrace His Legacy wholeheartedly with the inconsequentiality of his consequence.
http://www.ndol.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=826&kaid=85&subid=65
A World Safe For Socialism
They HATE America because Freedom is Not FREE; because it is not free,
that it embody Value, it become Fair Game for the rankest and
most depraved Moral Vandal among them.
http://www.enn.com/news/2003-09-04/s_7932.asp
Clinton narrates wolf-friendly Peter and the Wolf
In the new version, narrated by former
U.S. president Clinton and called Wolf Tracks,
Peter again captures the wolf but this time repents
of his act and releases the animal,
who howls a grateful goodbye.
FWIW:
The wolf's howl was not a greatful goodbye,
but a vindictive promise: He'll be back....
If Civilization is the process of Freeing Man from other Men,
what can be said about those who argue for its opposite?
Of greater 'interdependancy', 'co-dependancy'?
Visualize World Death. This is Clinton's Bridge.
Thank YOU! Bill Clinton.
---
I remember Judas, he was the one elected President
before he Disgraced his office and Betrayed us All.
"The Road to Tyranny begins with the Destruction of the Truth"
-- Bill Clinton'95
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Bushsucks wrote:
>
> No, I CONVENIENTLY remembered. Clinton CAUGHT and PROSECUTED the
> 1993 WTC bombers.
>
And that did not stop the bombings in Saudi Arabia, the two embassy
bombings in Africa, the attack on the USS Cole, the further attempts to
the hit the US directly around 2000 New Years, the 9/11 attacks, etc.
> He didn't start a fuckin' WAR ON ISLAM like Bush-
> a war that CREATES and MOTIVATES terrorists.
>
How much *more* motivation do they need? They are already dying to kill
themselves in martyrdom operations.
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Bushsucks wrote:
>
> You fuckin' IGNORAMUS - Bush 41 and Rumsfeld and Reagan CREATED
> Bin Laden - armed him, subsidized him, gave him the gas chemicals,
> AND JOINED HIS FAMILY IN BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS.
>
> Clinton BOMBED him, you Drooling Dipshitz Dimwit.
>
I thought you opposed military operations against bin Laden and the
terrorists. Now you are support them, if Clinton is behind them? What
gives?
Adam Albright
is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )"
>
>
>Bushsucks wrote:
>>
>> No, I CONVENIENTLY remembered. Clinton CAUGHT and PROSECUTED the
>> 1993 WTC bombers.
>>
>And that did not stop the bombings in Saudi Arabia, the two embassy
>bombings in Africa, the attack on the USS Cole, the further attempts to
>the hit the US directly around 2000 New Years, the 9/11 attacks, etc.
Yet you cackle mindlessly that Bush going after terroists is
different. Damn Billy, you're going in circles more than usual. You're
always such a depedable partisan asshole, talking out of both sides of
your mouth at once.
>
>
>> He didn't start a fuckin' WAR ON ISLAM like Bush-
>> a war that CREATES and MOTIVATES terrorists.
>>
>How much *more* motivation do they need? They are already dying to kill
>themselves in martyrdom operations.
Because of what they preceive as EVIL, ie BUSH and his junta, the
great Satan. At least they are willing to die for what they believe
in, brainwashed as they may be.
Obviously we can't say that about YOU billy yellow belly or any other
of your dickless right wing armchair chickenhawk warmongers that are
only willing to send somebody else's son off to die for you old farts
so you get to wave the flag. Talk about evil.
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE
> "Bill Bonde ( Straight invective
>is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )"
>>> No, I CONVENIENTLY remembered. Clinton CAUGHT and PROSECUTED the
>>> 1993 WTC bombers.
>>>
>>And that did not stop the bombings in Saudi Arabia, the two embassy
>>bombings in Africa, the attack on the USS Cole, the further attempts to
>>the hit the US directly around 2000 New Years, the 9/11 attacks, etc.
>
>Yet you cackle mindlessly that Bush going after terroists is different.
> Talk about Evil.
Indead, let us talk about Evil.
The only thing necessary for Evil to Prosper
is for Good Men to do Absolutely Nothing...
Clinton did even WORSE than that,
he, himself declared Open Season on their behalf.
Michael Ejercito
Bushsucks hates Jews for being Jews; that is all you need to know.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> You fuckin' IGNORAMUS - Bush 41 and Rumsfeld and Reagan CREATED
> Bin Laden - armed him, subsidized him, gave him the gas chemicals,
> AND JOINED HIS FAMILY IN BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> No, I CONVENIENTLY remembered. Clinton CAUGHT and PROSECUTED the
> 1993 WTC bombers. He didn't start a fuckin' WAR ON ISLAM like Bush-
> a war that CREATES and MOTIVATES terrorists.
>
American embassies in 1998? Or the Khobar Towers in 1996?
Michael
SteveL
wrote:
>On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:24:15 +0000, SteveL
><stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Nevertheless it is a simple and easily verifiable arithmetic FACT that
>>Mar 11 2004 is 912 days after Sept 11, 2001.
>
>Which means there's 911 days *between* 9/11/01 and 3/11/04.
Which is what I pointed out myself. But you seem to have snipped it.
Were those newspapers then implying 911 attack-free days bookended by
major terrorist atrocities? Hmm, what about Bali?
It is wrong to claim that 15 March 2005 is *exactly* a year later than
14 March 2004, say, even if you can show that there are 365 days
between them :-)
> If the
>bombers wanted to make a connection between their attack and 9/11,
>they'd probably reason something like that - there's not 911 days
>between 9/11/01 and 9/11/04; and they aren't patient enough to wait,
>anyway. Attacking on 3/10 if you want a connection to 9/11 just
>doesn't seem right somehow.
Yeah. so you attack on 3/11, exactly 6 months offset from 9/11. Plain
and obvious to everyone.
I answered Jim's assumption that "911 days" could not be a
coincidence.
I think it *IS* a coincidence, not least because it isn't actually 911
days later.
>
>If it makes you feel better somehow, they are probably looking at some
>kind of attack 9/11/04 if they think they can get away with it.
Why would that make me feel better?
> My
>guess is that will be a very unpopular day to fly this year.
Wouldn't be surprised.
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Actually "Bushsucks" views on this topic are not that different from
those of Zepp, Gandoof, Harry Hope and the other Democrat party
agitators who flood these newsgroups daily with their pro John Kerry
propaganda. I wonder what they would have Kerry do if he is elected
president. Do they expect Conservatives to high five American deaths and
terrorist atrocities if our guy isn't in office?
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Jim Alder wrote:
>
> Adam Albright <A...@ABC.net> wrote in
> news:83g7505cvs7s6gfa3...@4ax.com:
>
> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:40:07 -0000, Jim Alder
> > <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> When are you going to fuck off, punk?
> >
> > Hey Jimmy, you should get a rubber stamp with that made up.
>
> You should just fuck off, punk. Then I won't need one.
>
Plonk Adam, he's just a hydrophobic puppy dog snarling and spitting,
trying to infect everyone with his disease.
Bushsucks
result, creating MORE terrorists and putting out country at risk.
Bushsucks
Adam Albright
is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )"
You right wing fucking retard, you think only shit for brains assholes
like you can post to newsgroups like this lying your worhtless ass off
and spewing your hate?
Propaganda? You mean shit like YOU lying about Kerry having an affair
with a intern, you mean YOU lying about Jane Fonda's faked picture or
Kerry's faked picture, you mean YOU saying Kerry looks like Herman
Munster, you mean YOU and other right wing dumb fucks calling Kerry
Ketchup boy?
Bushsucks
to occupy the White House in history. He is DESTROYING America.
Because Kerry is the only challenger, I go with him.
Even Saddam Hussein (if eligible) would be better for America than
Bush.
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately
wbarwell
Google: Bush, Iraq, anthrax, Congressman Henry B. Gonzales
Bush daddy signed a presidential declaration allowing Saddam to import
dangerous anthrax and botulism cultures. Congressman Gonzales, head of
the House banking committee, in charge of dual use export licenses, tried
to start an investigation into this choice Bush stupidity. The GOP
leadership killed this investigation.
The Democrats, angry at that, tried to pass a bill to prevent the US from
aiding and abetting third world nations directly or indirectly in creating
biochemical weapons programs and the GOP worked overtime killing that too.
They were successful two weeks before Saddam invaded Kuwait.
Google is your friend, and ignorance is no excuse.
--
"I was not prepared to shoot my eardrum out with a shotgun
in order to get a deferment. Nor was I willing to go to
Canada. So I chose to better myself and learn to fly airplanes."
- George W. Bush May 1984 to the Houston Chronicle
Cheerful Charlie
Elmer Thudd
> Not quite. I hate BUSH for supporting Jews over Moslems, and as a
> result, creating MORE terrorists and putting out country at risk.
That's where you're just plain wrong.
Nobody seems to recall, but before the WTC attack, Bush was the best
friend the Moslems had...
Bush was the first U.S. President to ever refer to the "nation" of
Palestine.
The destruction of the WTC, and the near-universal jubilation from ther
Arab world, including the Pali's, made it obvious there ios no useful
purpose served by aiding those who would applaud our destruction.
Elmer Thudd
> Propaganda? You mean shit like YOU lying about Kerry having an affair
> with a intern, you mean YOU lying about Jane Fonda's faked picture or
> Kerry's faked picture, you mean YOU saying Kerry looks like Herman
> Munster, you mean YOU and other right wing dumb fucks calling Kerry
> Ketchup boy?
All of which is small potatoes compared to the vile spew coming from the
left for the last few years.
Elmer Thudd
> I'm not "pro John Kerry". I'm ANTI-BUSH, the WORST President
> to occupy the White House in history. He is DESTROYING America.
>
> Because Kerry is the only challenger, I go with him.
>
> Even Saddam Hussein (if eligible) would be better for America than
> Bush.
Which just about says it all WRT your credibilty and sense of proportion.
Morena
wrote:
>Bushsucks wrote:
>> Not quite. I hate BUSH for supporting Jews over Moslems, and as a
>> result, creating MORE terrorists and putting out country at risk.
>
>That's where you're just plain wrong.
>Nobody seems to recall, but before the WTC attack, Bush was the best
>friend the Moslems had...
>Bush was the first U.S. President to ever refer to the "nation" of
>Palestine.
As if one word, uttered by a president known for his verbal missteps,
somehow freed the Palestinians from bondage? Nope. Actually, Bush &
Co. have continued the U.S. tradition of supporting Israel's crimes,
any and all, generally by ignoring them.
>The destruction of the WTC, and the near-universal jubilation from ther
>Arab world, including the Pali's, made it obvious there ios no useful
>purpose served by aiding those who would applaud our destruction.
Why are right-wingers so good at confusing cause and effect?
Adam Albright
is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )"
What's the matter Billy, I'm too much for you to handle?
I know your ass is black and blue from me kicking it every day. Prove
you're the coward you are and plonk. Its so you.
Dave Lister
Nonsense, loon. The right is only getting a small taste of they were
putting out for the previous eight.
--
Bush Lied.
Anybody But Bush.
Regime change begins at home.
Dave Lister
It says how much Bush is hated, loon. I'd vote for Satan over Bush.
Dave Lister
news:6930a3c6.04031...@posting.google.com:
Pull your head out of your ass and open a history book, loon.
Dave Lister
news:4054E8A0...@backpacker.com:
And you are just a moronic right-wingnut shill trying to infect others with
yours, Bozo.
Jim Alder
news:7hh950llqpv3t95ce...@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:58:43 -0000, Jim Alder
> <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>
>>Adam Albright <A...@ABC.net> wrote in
>>news:83g7505cvs7s6gfa3...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:40:07 -0000, Jim Alder
>>> <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> When are you going to fuck off, punk?
>>>
>>> Hey Jimmy, you should get a rubber stamp with that made up.
>>
>> You should just fuck off, punk. Then I won't need one.
>
> You're just giving him the attention he craves. Every time
> someone points out he's stupid he jacks off in gratitude.
> Just killfile him and save yourself the aggravation.
I would have long ago, but he wants me to SO badly! He's
obviously one of those guys who thinks being killfiled is some
kind of victory. Probably weaned too early.
--
"In my humble opinion, the petty carping levied against Bush by
the Democrats proves again, it is better to have your eye plucked
out by an eagle than to be nibbled to death by ducks." - Norman
Liebmann
Jim Alder
news:8q2dnUWkIo8...@giganews.com:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 01:57:05 -0000, Jim Alder
> <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>
>>SteveL <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in
>>news:FfSdneiGgu2...@giganews.com:
>>
>>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:58:48 -0000, Jim Alder
>>> <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Bushsucks <Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote in
>>>>news:405308...@moron.com:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd say that there is some symbolism to the Spain bombings
>>>>> taking place EXACTLY six months away from the 9/11
>>>>> anniversary.
>>>>
>>>> No one here seems to be mentioning the fact that it was
>>>> exactly nine hundred and eleven days AFTER 911. I hope
>>>> no one thinks that is a coincidence?
>>>
>>> It was 912 days not 911. Close but no cigar.
>>>
>>> And anyway, "911" is an American term. Many other (perhaps
>>> even *most*) countries go dd-mm not mm-dd.
>>
>>3/11 happened 911 days after 9/11
>>Times of India, India - Mar 12, 2004
>>
>>Terror: 911 days after 9/11
>>News24, South Africa - Mar 11, 2004
>>
>>Terror strikes 911 days after September 11
>>NEWS.com.au, Australia - Mar 12, 2004
>>
>>Sydney Morning Herald, Australia - 11 hours ago
>>... Attorney-General Philip Ruddock noted that the attack on
>>Madrid took place exactly 911 days after the September 11
>>terrorist attacks in New York and Washington
>>
>>Railways on terror alert
>>ic Birmingham.co.uk, UK - 11 hours ago
>>... Today a BTP spokesman said a review of security had been
>>launched following the Madrid bombings - which came exactly
>>911 days after the atrocities in New York
>>
>>IrishExaminer.com (subscription), Ireland - 18 hours ago
>>... In a strange coincidence, the attacks on Madrid came
>>exactly two-and-a-half years, or 911 days, after the terrorist
>>atrocity against New York and Washington
>>
>>Calgary Sun, Canada - Mar 12, 2004
>>... There were 911 days in-between the terror attacks in
>>Madrid and Sept. 11, 2001
>
> Impressive collection of reports wrongly claiming that Mar 11,
> 2004 is 911 days after Sept 11, 2001.
No, it was a collection of reports demonstrating that 9/11 was
not "an American term" as you stated.
> Nevertheless it is a simple and easily verifiable arithmetic
> FACT that Mar 11 2004 is 912 days after Sept 11, 2001.
It's a semantic argument at best, and really not that
important. If you really think it's a random coincidence, so be
it. I won't try to convince you otherwise.
> I wasn't trying to make a big deal of it, so please don't get
> in a huff of "argument from authority" indignation because I
> dare to go against what those various austere sources claim.
>
> So please find a julian date calculator...
I did that long before I posted on the topic.
> ... on the web before you
> call me arrogant or jumped up or stupid for publically denying
> those sources. Keep in mind that numbers are numbers, and it
> doesn't matter who does the calculating. There is nothing
> democratic or about it (20 people claiming that 2+2 is 5 do
> not outrank one person claiming it's 4).....
>
> (Note that it IS possible to shoehorn 911 into the equation if
> you carefully claim that there were "911 days between
> attacks", but that's kind of like claiming that today (Sunday)
> is 6 days after the previous Sunday because there were 6 days
> between).
Maybe that's how they do things in Islam.
>>> Now if something had happened after 119 days (or does happen
>>> after 1109 days)......
>>
>> Anything but what actually is, eh? Interesting denial
>>technique. Considering the message was aimed as much at the US
>>as at Spain, to ignore such a thing would be foolish.
>
> What "denial technique"?? I am perfectly willing to accept
> that the terrorists exploited the symbolism of "exactly 6
> months between Sept 11th and Mar 11". I'm just not willing to
> accept the rather subtler 911 days symbolism - especially when
> that figure is demonstrably WRONG!!!
>
>>
>>> The "six months from Sept 11th" link is more compelling.
>>> Perhaps ETA were mindful of that symbolism.
>>
>> Why? Does 'six months' have some significance that 911 does
>>not?
>
> Because it is true and "911 days" is not!!
>
> SHEESH!!!
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE
overshoot its mark. )"
..
>I wonder what they would have Kerry do if he is elected president.
>Do they expect Conservatives to high five American deaths and
>terrorist atrocities if our guy isn't in office?
NOoooo! Mr. Bond,
They expect you to DIE.
http://www.townhall.com/news/politics/200401/FOR20040127a.shtml
Kerry, Dean Both Suggest Clinton As Middle East Envoy
They expect JFK to send Bill Clinton *immediately* to our enemies,
to deliver our unconditional and unilateral capitulation,
the sea of Suicide Bombers would part before him
like the Red Sea did before Moses.
The Savagry,
The Pagentry,
The Irony,
These People HATE us because their VERY EXISTANCE
depends upon the willingness of the Good to sacrifice themselves
unto the Guilty, the Unworthy, the Evil... This is Clinton's Bridge.
Jim Alder
wrote in news:4054E8A0...@backpacker.com:
>
>
You're giving him way too much credit. Even a rabid pup poses
SOME danger. Not2bright is just a punk.
Jim Alder
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:20:00 -0800, "Bill Bonde ( Straight
> invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot
> its mark. )" <std...@backpacker.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Jim Alder wrote:
>>>
>>> Adam Albright <A...@ABC.net> wrote in
>>> news:83g7505cvs7s6gfa3...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:40:07 -0000, Jim Alder
>>> > <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> When are you going to fuck off, punk?
>>> >
>>> > Hey Jimmy, you should get a rubber stamp with that made
>>> > up.
>>>
>>> You should just fuck off, punk. Then I won't need one.
>>>
>>Plonk Adam, he's just a hydrophobic puppy dog snarling and
>>spitting, trying to infect everyone with his disease.
>
> What's the matter Billy, I'm too much for you to handle?
See, Bill? He'll take being killfiled as some kind of victory.
That's why he tries so hard to be a vapid pest.
> I know your ass is black and blue from me kicking it every
> day. Prove you're the coward you are and plonk. Its so you.
>
>
>
--
Adam Albright
wrote:
>OrionCA <ori...@earthlink.net> wrote in
>news:7hh950llqpv3t95ce...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 05:58:43 -0000, Jim Alder
>> <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Adam Albright <A...@ABC.net> wrote in
>>>news:83g7505cvs7s6gfa3...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:40:07 -0000, Jim Alder
>>>> <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When are you going to fuck off, punk?
>>>>
>>>> Hey Jimmy, you should get a rubber stamp with that made up.
>>>
>>> You should just fuck off, punk. Then I won't need one.
>>
>> You're just giving him the attention he craves. Every time
>> someone points out he's stupid he jacks off in gratitude.
>> Just killfile him and save yourself the aggravation.
>
> I would have long ago, but he wants me to SO badly! He's
>obviously one of those guys who thinks being killfiled is some
>kind of victory. Probably weaned too early.
Talking to yourself again Jimmy? Isn't it time you cleaned off you
keyboard? I'm guessing yours gets very sticky and smell like ammonia.
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Small potatoes, Ketchup Boy, good grief. Look, he looks like Herman
Munster. Ketchup ain' there!
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Bushsucks wrote:
>
> I'm not "pro John Kerry". I'm ANTI-BUSH, the WORST President
> to occupy the White House in history. He is DESTROYING America.
>
How is Bush causing this trouble for you? Can you even explain it? I
doubt it but I'll listen. Put it right here ------>
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE wrote:
>
> In article "Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately
> overshoot its mark. )"
> ..
> >I wonder what they would have Kerry do if he is elected president.
> >Do they expect Conservatives to high five American deaths and
> >terrorist atrocities if our guy isn't in office?
>
> NOoooo! Mr. Bond,
> They expect you to DIE.
>
I know. I'm gonna try to wait them out.
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Jim Alder wrote:
>
> Adam Albright <A...@ABC.net> wrote in
> news:dbs9509vc1u7mv00g...@4ax.com:
>
> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:20:00 -0800, "Bill Bonde ( Straight
> > invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot
> > its mark. )" <std...@backpacker.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>Jim Alder wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Adam Albright <A...@ABC.net> wrote in
> >>> news:83g7505cvs7s6gfa3...@4ax.com:
> >>>
> >>> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 00:40:07 -0000, Jim Alder
> >>> > <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >> When are you going to fuck off, punk?
> >>> >
> >>> > Hey Jimmy, you should get a rubber stamp with that made
> >>> > up.
> >>>
> >>> You should just fuck off, punk. Then I won't need one.
> >>>
> >>Plonk Adam, he's just a hydrophobic puppy dog snarling and
> >>spitting, trying to infect everyone with his disease.
> >
> > What's the matter Billy, I'm too much for you to handle?
>
> See, Bill? He'll take being killfiled as some kind of victory.
> That's why he tries so hard to be a vapid pest.
>
I know he thinks it's a victory. I'd rather have others take up the
battle, as it were, and show him he's pronk. Once he gets it, I expect a
self-imposed martyrdom operation. I'll go to the funeral.
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Infect? Let me get this straight, I come up with somefing and you steal
it?
David Moffitt
"Dave Lister" <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94ACCEE91CF37re...@68.6.19.6...
> Elmer Thudd <wab...@wabbit.net> wrote in news:4054FC72...@wabbit.net:
>
> > Bushsucks wrote:
> >> I'm not "pro John Kerry". I'm ANTI-BUSH, the WORST President
> >> to occupy the White House in history. He is DESTROYING America.
> >>
> >> Because Kerry is the only challenger, I go with him.
> >>
> >> Even Saddam Hussein (if eligible) would be better for America than
> >> Bush.
> >
> > Which just about says it all WRT your credibilty and sense of
proportion.
>
> It says how much Bush is hated, loon. I'd vote for Satan over Bush.
%%%% You may just be doing that Lisper.
KERRY LIED AND US POWS DIED!
ANYBODY BUT KERRY
Adam Albright
Billy can't handle anybody telling the truth about him.
Pro-American
<Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote:
>I'd say that there is some symbolism to the Spain bombings taking
>place EXACTLY six months away from the 9/11 anniversary.
>
> Were Spanish officials asleep at the switch like Bush was on 9-11?
>They can thank Bush and their own Bush-bribed leaders, who fell for
>the Bush Iraq War - fetching Spain 200+ DEAD, 1500 hurt on 3-11.
Osama couldn't have said it better. Thanks for being his (unwitting?)
pawn.
Jim Alder
No, dumbshit. I'm talking to OrionCA. Have you gotten even
stupider than before and now you can't even figure out a simple
thread?
> Isn't it time you cleaned off you keyboard? I'm guessing
> yours gets very sticky and smell like ammonia.
More masturbation fantasies about me, Not2bright? Why don't you
find a boyfriend and leave us alone here?
Dave Lister
overshoot its mark. )" <std...@backpacker.com> wrote in
You aren't making any more sense now than you ever do, Bozo.
Dave Lister
news:Ajh5c.36397$qZ5....@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com:
>
> "Dave Lister" <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns94ACCEE91CF37re...@68.6.19.6...
>> Elmer Thudd <wab...@wabbit.net> wrote in
>> news:4054FC72...@wabbit.net:
>>
>> > Bushsucks wrote:
>> >> I'm not "pro John Kerry". I'm ANTI-BUSH, the WORST President
>> >> to occupy the White House in history. He is DESTROYING America.
>> >>
>> >> Because Kerry is the only challenger, I go with him.
>> >>
>> >> Even Saddam Hussein (if eligible) would be better for America
>> >> than
>> >> Bush.
>> >
>> > Which just about says it all WRT your credibilty and sense of
> proportion.
>>
>> It says how much Bush is hated, loon. I'd vote for Satan over Bush.
>
> %%%% You may just be doing that Lisper.
Oh, well. Maybe Satan should hand over his crown to Bush, loon.
Dave Lister
news:vdib50dd2leu8smeo...@4ax.com:
Why would Osama say anything of the sort, loon? He had nothing to do with
the Iraq war.
Dave Lister
news:Xns94AD6B635F3C8...@216.168.3.44:
> More masturbation fantasies about me, Not2bright? Why don't you
> find a boyfriend and leave us alone here?
Poor Jimmy, still expressing his homosexual fantasies.
Michael Ejercito
> meje...@hotmail.com (Michael Ejercito) wrote in
> news:6930a3c6.04031...@posting.google.com:
>
> > Bushsucks <Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote in message
> > news:<405479...@moron.com>...
> >> You fuckin' IGNORAMUS - Bush 41 and Rumsfeld and Reagan CREATED
> >> Bin Laden - armed him, subsidized him, gave him the gas chemicals,
> >> AND JOINED HIS FAMILY IN BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS.
> > Proof?
>
> Pull your head out of your ass and open a history book, loon.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>
> > Bushsucks <Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote in message
> > news:<405479...@moron.com>...
> >> You fuckin' IGNORAMUS - Bush 41 and Rumsfeld and Reagan CREATED
> >> Bin Laden - armed him, subsidized him, gave him the gas chemicals,
> >> AND JOINED HIS FAMILY IN BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS.
> > Proof?
> >
>
>
> Bush daddy signed a presidential declaration allowing Saddam to import
> dangerous anthrax and botulism cultures. Congressman Gonzales, head of
> the House banking committee, in charge of dual use export licenses, tried
> to start an investigation into this choice Bush stupidity. The GOP
> leadership killed this investigation.
> The Democrats, angry at that, tried to pass a bill to prevent the US from
> aiding and abetting third world nations directly or indirectly in creating
> biochemical weapons programs and the GOP worked overtime killing that too.
> They were successful two weeks before Saddam invaded Kuwait.
So where was Bin Laden mentioned in the article?
Michael
Dave Lister
> Dave Lister <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:<Xns94ACCF0AEC4BEre...@68.6.19.6>...
>> meje...@hotmail.com (Michael Ejercito) wrote in
>> news:6930a3c6.04031...@posting.google.com:
>>
>> > Bushsucks <Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote in message
>> > news:<405479...@moron.com>...
>> >> You fuckin' IGNORAMUS - Bush 41 and Rumsfeld and Reagan CREATED
>> >> Bin Laden - armed him, subsidized him, gave him the gas chemicals,
>> >> AND JOINED HIS FAMILY IN BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS.
>> > Proof?
>>
>> Pull your head out of your ass and open a history book, loon.
> When did they arm Bin Laden, and for what purpose?
They armed him to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan, loon.
Jim Alder
> Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in
> news:Xns94AD6B635F3C8...@216.168.3.44:
>
>> More masturbation fantasies about me, Not2bright? Why
>> don't you find a boyfriend and leave us alone here?
>
> Poor Jimmy, still expressing his homosexual fantasies.
Typical lying troll.
Dave Lister
> Dave Lister <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:Xns94AD5CDAAE8BCre...@68.6.19.6:
>
>> Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns94AD6B635F3C8...@216.168.3.44:
>>
>>> More masturbation fantasies about me, Not2bright? Why
>>> don't you find a boyfriend and leave us alone here?
>>
>> Poor Jimmy, still expressing his homosexual fantasies.
>
> Typical lying troll.
Poor Jimmy doesn't like the spotlight shining on him.
--
Un-elect Dubya in 2004
John Kerry for President
Jim Alder
You're not bright enough to be a spotlight, Davey. Or even a
candle. Stop aggrandizing yourself, tho of course no one else is
going to do it for you. You and other little punks like Not2bright
delight in this hit and run crap, calling someone a name then
running away. Of course, in this case there's no need to even run,
is there? The anonymity of the internet was custom made for
chicken-shits like you. You are the Internet's burning bag of
dogshit on the front porch.
Dave Lister
> You're not bright enough to be a spotlight, Davey. Or even a
> candle. Stop aggrandizing yourself, tho of course no one else is
> going to do it for you. You and other little punks like Not2bright
> delight in this hit and run crap, calling someone a name then
> running away. Of course, in this case there's no need to even run,
> is there? The anonymity of the internet was custom made for
> chicken-shits like you. You are the Internet's burning bag of
> dogshit on the front porch.
Poor Jimmy, he wants so much to be taken seriously.
Adam Albright
wrote:
>Dave Lister <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>news:7141f6bb1f1396db...@news.teranews.com:
>
>> Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns94AD87F5C115A...@216.168.3.44:
>>
>>> Dave Lister <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:Xns94AD5CDAAE8BCre...@68.6.19.6:
>>>
>>>> Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in
>>>> news:Xns94AD6B635F3C8...@216.168.3.44:
>>>>
>>>>> More masturbation fantasies about me, Not2bright? Why
>>>>> don't you find a boyfriend and leave us alone here?
>>>>
>>>> Poor Jimmy, still expressing his homosexual fantasies.
>>>
>>> Typical lying troll.
>>
>> Poor Jimmy doesn't like the spotlight shining on him.
>
> You're not bright enough to be a spotlight, Davey. Or even a
>candle. Stop aggrandizing yourself, tho of course no one else is
>going to do it for you. You and other little punks like Not2bright
>delight in this hit and run crap, calling someone a name then
>running away. Of course, in this case there's no need to even run,
>is there? The anonymity of the internet was custom made for
>chicken-shits like you. You are the Internet's burning bag of
>dogshit on the front porch.
Hit and run? How can I be "running away" if I keep kicking you in your
stupid ass?
You have such a limited vocabulary that you're know for repeatedly
saying fuck off punk and assorted other juvenile comments. That's why
I refer to you as Jimmy jerk-off. In truth, YOU are the smart-ass
punk, and that's what teenage boys love to do... jerk-off and say
fuck-you. So Jimmy, you reap what you sow. Grow up, maybe you'll get
treated differently. But you can't grow up because my guess is you
sixty something going on eight. You'll never change.
David Moffitt
"Dave Lister" <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:13995fb193fa644d...@news.teranews.com...
%%%% He is taken a lot more seriously than you Lisper!!
KERRY LIED
POW'S DIED
Re-elect Dubya in 2004
Jim Alder
>
> "Dave Lister" <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:13995fb193fa644d...@news.teranews.com...
>> Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns94AD9B2F3B363...@216.168.3.44:
>>
>> > You're not bright enough to be a spotlight, Davey. Or
>> > even a
>> > candle. Stop aggrandizing yourself, tho of course no one
>> > else is going to do it for you. You and other little punks
>> > like Not2bright delight in this hit and run crap, calling
>> > someone a name then running away. Of course, in this case
>> > there's no need to even run, is there? The anonymity of the
>> > internet was custom made for chicken-shits like you. You
>> > are the Internet's burning bag of dogshit on the front
>> > porch.
>>
>> Poor Jimmy, he wants so much to be taken seriously.
>
> %%%% He is taken a lot more seriously than you Lisper!!
Damned by faint praise.
Jim Alder
Fuck off, punk.
Dave Lister
$jH3....@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com:
>
> "Dave Lister" <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:13995fb193fa644d...@news.teranews.com...
>> Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in
>> news:Xns94AD9B2F3B363...@216.168.3.44:
>>
>> > You're not bright enough to be a spotlight, Davey. Or even a
>> > candle. Stop aggrandizing yourself, tho of course no one else is
>> > going to do it for you. You and other little punks like Not2bright
>> > delight in this hit and run crap, calling someone a name then
>> > running away. Of course, in this case there's no need to even run,
>> > is there? The anonymity of the internet was custom made for
>> > chicken-shits like you. You are the Internet's burning bag of
>> > dogshit on the front porch.
>>
>> Poor Jimmy, he wants so much to be taken seriously.
>
> %%%% He is taken a lot more seriously than you Lisper!!
Poor Muppet. Forced to find allies among the dregs.
Dave Lister
>
> Fuck off, punk.
It would be nice to know who you are flaming, loon.
David Moffitt
%%%% I'm not seeking allies, I only seek to post the truth Lisper!! :o)
Roger
news:2oC5c.25323$hG4....@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
We'll let you know when you do it for the first time.
Jim Alder
> "Dave Lister" <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns94ADDC71031AFre...@68.6.19.6...
>> "David Moffitt" <weaselkiller@ prodigy.net> wrote in
>> news:fwu5c.25208 $jH3....@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com:
>
>> > "Dave Lister" <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> Poor Jimmy, he wants so much to be taken seriously.
>> >
>> > %%%% He is taken a lot more seriously than you Lisper!!
>>
>> Poor Muppet. Forced to find allies among the dregs.
>
> %%%% I'm not seeking allies, I only seek to post the truth
> Lisper!! :o)
Why waste the truth on Davey?
Jim Alder
> Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in
> news:Xns94ADF0393F23D...@216.168.3.44:
>
>>
>> Fuck off, punk.
>
> It would be nice to know who you are flaming, loon.
>
When it's you, you'll know, Davey. When you see "Fuck off,
punk" it's Adumb Not2bright. Even that is more time than I want to
waste on him.
Jim Alder
news:8a5e50tqbf2bjpng9...@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:34:27 -0000, Jim Alder
> <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> You're just giving him the attention he craves. Every time
>>> someone points out he's stupid he jacks off in gratitude.
>>> Just killfile him and save yourself the aggravation.
>>
>> I would have long ago, but he wants me to SO badly! He's
>>obviously one of those guys who thinks being killfiled is some
>>kind of victory. Probably weaned too early.
>
> Why should you care what he wants? If he sees being stuck in
> the corner as a "victory", that's his problem.
Not giving them what they want is the only way to torment
trolls.
Dave Lister
> "David Moffitt" <weaselkiller@ prodigy.net> wrote in
> news:2oC5c.25323$hG4....@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com:
>
>> "Dave Lister" <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns94ADDC71031AFre...@68.6.19.6...
>>> "David Moffitt" <weaselkiller@ prodigy.net> wrote in
>>> news:fwu5c.25208 $jH3....@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com:
>>
>>> > "Dave Lister" <retsil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
>>> >> Poor Jimmy, he wants so much to be taken seriously.
>>> >
>>> > %%%% He is taken a lot more seriously than you Lisper!!
>>>
>>> Poor Muppet. Forced to find allies among the dregs.
>>
>> %%%% I'm not seeking allies, I only seek to post the truth
>> Lisper!! :o)
>
> Why waste the truth on Davey?
When it seems you need the dregs you've got....
David Moffitt
"Roger" <rog...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FPC5c.24630$Lk.1...@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
%%%% Here: You are lib/dem/socialist terrorist supporting pile of rancid dog
shit. :o)
KERRY LIED
POW'S DIED
RE-ELECT BUSH
Roger
T.Carr
Roger" <rog...@hotmail.com
> We'll let you know when you do it for the first time.
Something tells me that if Bush is re-elected this fall, that you
will not be supporting the notion that he could serve past Jan 2009.
After all if he wasnt "elected" the first time the first term wouldnt
count right?
T.Carr
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Dave Lister wrote:
>
> meje...@hotmail.com (Michael Ejercito) wrote in
> news:6930a3c6.04031...@posting.google.com:
>
> > Bushsucks <Impeachth...@moron.com> wrote in message
> > news:<405479...@moron.com>...
> >> You fuckin' IGNORAMUS - Bush 41 and Rumsfeld and Reagan CREATED
> >> Bin Laden - armed him, subsidized him, gave him the gas chemicals,
> >> AND JOINED HIS FAMILY IN BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS.
> > Proof?
>
> Pull your head out of your ass and open a history book, loon.
>
The Mohammed bin Laden family is huge. He had eleven wives. Osama bin
Laden is the only son from one of Mohammed's wives whom he later
divorced. The family is extremely rich and doing business in Saudi
Arabia without doing business with someone in the Mohammed bin Laden
clan can be difficult. None of this has anything to do with Osama bin
Laden who was expelled from Saudi Arabia and his citizenship revoked
years ago. Blaming the large Mohammed bin Laden family for whatever the
latest evil Osama has done is even less sensible than blaming Bill
Clinton for the silliness that his half brother Roger gets himself into.
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately overshoot its mark. )
Nope.
Dave Lister
overshoot its mark. )" <std...@backpacker.com> wrote in
news:4058BE86...@backpacker.com:
Moron.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/155236.stm
Born in Saudi Arabia to a Yemeni family, Bin Laden left Saudi Arabia in
1979 to fight against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
The Afghan jihad was backed with American dollars and had the blessing of
the governments of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
He received security training from the CIA itself, according to Middle
Eastern analyst Hazhir Teimourian.
While in Afghanistan, he founded the Maktab al-Khidimat (MAK), which
recruited fighters from around the world and imported equipment to aid
the Afghan resistance against the Soviet army.
Egyptians, Lebanese, Turks and others - numbering thousands in Bin
Laden's estimate - joined their Afghan Muslim brothers in the struggle
against an ideology that spurned religion.
Bushsucks
of a brain, who read ANYTHING 20 years ago, knows that Bin Laden
was the creation of Reagan, Bush 41 and the CIA.
http://www.texasobserver.org/showArticle.asp?ArticleID=480
Bill Bonde ( Straight invective is not satire; satire must deliberately