Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Voter ID should be a federal law! - I watched the Ed Show last night, he had Al Sharpton in a lather over...

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 16, 2012, 2:09:43 PM8/16/12
to
I watched the Ed Show last night, he had Al Sharpton in a lather over
voter suppression. Not once did anyone mention the basic requirement
to vote 'is' of proving US citizenship. The new law doesn't do that
which surprises me, It only requires proper ID when voting.

Next year when Oboobuhcare really kicks in proper ID will be required
to get hospital services, where's the horror in that requirement? We
haven't gotten there yet.

Sharpton and the other Progressives who don't care WHO votes as long
as they vote Dim, diluting the meaning of 'citizen' by fighting
against proper ID.

There argument falls flat when one considers the requirements
responsible living has on obtaining a drivers licence, getting food
stamps, getting WICA, housing and renting a TV.

Voter ID should be a federal law!

CB
Oboobuh's publicist is a birther?
...
The literary agent of Barack Obama used 'born in Kenya' as part of a
promotional pamphlet designed to help sell Obama’s first
autobiography, Dreams from My Father.
...
http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2012/05/obama-born-in-kenya-according-to-his-literary-agency/

Wayne

unread,
Aug 16, 2012, 2:19:00 PM8/16/12
to


"Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @ 7/11.nig" wrote in message
news:gpdq28pegs3jcuvom...@4ax.com...

# I watched the Ed Show last night, he had Al Sharpton in a lather over
# voter suppression. Not once did anyone mention the basic requirement
# to vote 'is' of proving US citizenship. The new law doesn't do that
# which surprises me, It only requires proper ID when voting.

# Next year when Oboobuhcare really kicks in proper ID will be required
# to get hospital services, where's the horror in that requirement? We
# haven't gotten there yet.

# Sharpton and the other Progressives who don't care WHO votes as long
# as they vote Dim, diluting the meaning of 'citizen' by fighting
# against proper ID.

# There argument falls flat when one considers the requirements
# responsible living has on obtaining a drivers licence, getting food
# stamps, getting WICA, housing and renting a TV.

# Voter ID should be a federal law!

If it were a federal law, it would be another opportunity for the Dictator
in Chief to make his executive order invalidate existing law.

With the DICs recent amnesty policy, it is just one step away to provide the
semi-illegals with ID so that they can vote. Wouldn't be surprised if that
happens before November.

Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 16, 2012, 2:58:32 PM8/16/12
to
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:19:00 -0700, "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net>
wrote:
Not in the 29 states that have Republican governors.

If Obama tried that the states which value 'citizen' would pass laws
requiring proof of citizenship...as it should and to Hell with race
baiters.

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 17, 2012, 11:20:00 PM8/17/12
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> I watched the Ed Show last night, he had Al Sharpton in a lather over
> voter suppression. Not once did anyone mention the basic requirement
> to vote 'is' of proving US citizenship. The new law doesn't do that
> which surprises me, It only requires proper ID when voting.

And yet, voter fraud is virtually NON EXISTENT.

If you think otherwise, post the statistics proving it ->

Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 18, 2012, 1:54:14 PM8/18/12
to
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:20:00 -0600, RichTravsky
<traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>>
>> I watched the Ed Show last night, he had Al Sharpton in a lather over
>> voter suppression. Not once did anyone mention the basic requirement
>> to vote 'is' of proving US citizenship. The new law doesn't do that
>> which surprises me, It only requires proper ID when voting.
>
>And yet, voter fraud is virtually NON EXISTENT.
>
>If you think otherwise, post the statistics proving it ->

It doesn't matter what I think or you, it's whether you and I respect
the meaning of citizen enough to require voter ID. I'd prefer a
requirement of the DMV or Voter Registry require proof of citizenship
for a voter ID. I can imagine what a commi must think about that idea,
huh?

>
>> Next year when Oboobuhcare really kicks in proper ID will be required
>> to get hospital services, where's the horror in that requirement? We
>> haven't gotten there yet.
>>
>> Sharpton and the other Progressives who don't care WHO votes as long
>> as they vote Dim, diluting the meaning of 'citizen' by fighting
>> against proper ID.

No argument there huh commi?
Message has been deleted

Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 18, 2012, 3:54:13 PM8/18/12
to
On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:33:53 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:54:14 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>
>>It doesn't matter what I think or you, it's whether you and I respect
>>the meaning of citizen enough to require voter ID. I'd prefer a
>>requirement of the DMV or Voter Registry require proof of citizenship
>>for a voter ID. I can imagine what a commi must think about that idea,
>>huh?
>
>So a 90 year old in a nursing home should get one?

There's always Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition bus to take her to
the registrar's office. She'd like to get out and see the sights of
the town. Don't suppress her right to get out once in a while.

>
>
>
>>==================================================================
>
>On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:12:48 -0400, CB <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>
>>Notice the very guy I call nigger (because of the vulgar words he
>>says), cuts his own content out, 'segregating his low life character
>>from the words he said.
>>
>>You're a nigger, not because of your white skin color, because of
>>your character.

Yeah...so? Nigger describes you best when you 'qualify' But today...so
far...no qualifications.

Opps... I just looked up to the Subject, nigger

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
Aug 18, 2012, 5:53:00 PM8/18/12
to

<Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
news:efrv28d7djhvc8hl7...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:54:14 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> 7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>
>>It doesn't matter what I think or you, it's whether you and I respect
>>the meaning of citizen enough to require voter ID. I'd prefer a
>>requirement of the DMV or Voter Registry require proof of citizenship
>>for a voter ID. I can imagine what a commi must think about that idea,
>>huh?
>
> So a 90 year old in a nursing home should get one?
>

So some dumb asshole called "yoorghis" should get one?

Message has been deleted

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
Aug 19, 2012, 4:58:43 PM8/19/12
to

<Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
news:78g238lgr33hndkmp...@4ax.com...
> If the SecState has sufficient identification to put it on a voter
> registration supplied to Precincts...
>
> You have a problem with that?
>

I have a problem that about one million voters in Pennsylvania will be
denied the right to vote.

emoneyjoe

unread,
Aug 19, 2012, 5:51:49 PM8/19/12
to
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:58:43 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
<R...@hotmail.com> wrote:

><Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
>news:78g238lgr33hndkmp...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:53:00 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
>> <R...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
>>>news:efrv28d7djhvc8hl7...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:54:14 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>>>> 7/11.nig wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It doesn't matter what I think or you, it's whether you and I respect
>>>>>the meaning of citizen enough to require voter ID. I'd prefer a
>>>>>requirement of the DMV or Voter Registry require proof of citizenship
>>>>>for a voter ID. I can imagine what a commi must think about that idea,
>>>>>huh?
>>>>
>>>> So a 90 year old in a nursing home should get one?
>>>>
>>>
>>>So some dumb asshole called "yoorghis" should get one?
>>
>> If the SecState has sufficient identification to put it on a voter
>> registration supplied to Precincts...
>>
>> You have a problem with that?
>>
>
>I have a problem that about one million voters in Pennsylvania will be
>denied the right to vote.

Which ones are those? How is that possible,
if they are US citizens, not felons, they can surely
vote once in the precinct where they live.


Maybe the state has computer software that
checks to see who votes with their maiden names
where their parents live, but that isn't what you
are talking about, is it?







Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
Aug 19, 2012, 6:36:40 PM8/19/12
to

"emoneyjoe" <emon...@iglou.com> wrote in message
news:lon2389vhp7mja7ff...@4ax.com...

>>I have a problem that about one million voters in Pennsylvania will be
>>denied the right to vote.
>
> Which ones are those? How is that possible,
> if they are US citizens, not felons, they can surely
> vote once in the precinct where they live.

You must live in Canada or someplace where there aren't any teabaggers.

What you state is true in a democracy. However we are talking about
Pennsylvania where the teabaggers took control of the state legislature.
Even though there has never been more than ten convictions of voter fraud
over the past twenty years in Pennsylvania, the baggers put into law
restrictions that just about limits a person's right to vote unless they
have a drivers license.

Even government issued IDs are insufficient for voting in Pennsylvania if
they do not have an expiration date. And for older Americans who were born
in the rural south where just a baptismal certificate was issued instead of
a regular birth certificate, they will be barred from voting forever.

Why would such a restrictive law be put in place? Here's the speaker of the
Pennsylvania House to explain:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87NN5sdqNt8

John Doe

unread,
Aug 19, 2012, 6:38:38 PM8/19/12
to
Yoorghis Jurgis.net wrote:

I found a video of your mom on YouTube...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ml5IjwLNe4
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

emoneyjoe

unread,
Aug 19, 2012, 8:57:55 PM8/19/12
to
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 18:36:40 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
<R...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>"emoneyjoe" <emon...@iglou.com> wrote in message
>news:lon2389vhp7mja7ff...@4ax.com...
>
>>>I have a problem that about one million voters in Pennsylvania will be
>>>denied the right to vote.
>>
>> Which ones are those? How is that possible,
>> if they are US citizens, not felons, they can surely
>> vote once in the precinct where they live.
>
>You must live in Canada or someplace where there aren't any teabaggers.

Canada voting is not the subject.


>What you state is true in a democracy. However we are talking about
>Pennsylvania where the teabaggers took control of the state legislature.

If a person voted before they probably won't
have any problem in 2012.


>Even though there has never been more than ten convictions of voter fraud
>over the past twenty years in Pennsylvania, the baggers put into law
>restrictions that just about limits a person's right to vote unless they
>have a drivers license.

It doesn't matter how much fraud there has been
before, voting has always required some proof of
citizenship, age, and resident address.


>Even government issued IDs are insufficient for voting in Pennsylvania if
>they do not have an expiration date.

More important, they should show citizenship,
age and resident address.


>And for older Americans who were born
>in the rural south where just a baptismal certificate was issued instead of
>a regular birth certificate, they will be barred from voting forever.

What states would that be? Why would you think
a baptismal certificate wouldn't be acceptable if the
voter's has the other proof documents.


>Why would such a restrictive law be put in place? Here's the speaker of the
>Pennsylvania House to explain:
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87NN5sdqNt8

Where was that recorded, it could be just a
hope, or he could be talking to just republicans
at some other place than the house floor.


So you think a person who has been on
Social Security and Medicare or Medicaid,
that owns or rents, or gets mail at home,
will have a problem registering and voting?


How many other things do you imagine?







Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
Aug 19, 2012, 9:36:15 PM8/19/12
to

"emoneyjoe" <emon...@iglou.com> wrote in message
news:902338d95ohq0pddi...@4ax.com...

>>"emoneyjoe" <emon...@iglou.com> wrote in message

>>You must live in Canada or someplace where there aren't any teabaggers.
>
> Canada voting is not the subject.
No, but you can vote there without a drivers license.
>
>
>>What you state is true in a democracy. However we are talking about
>>Pennsylvania where the teabaggers took control of the state legislature.
>
> If a person voted before they probably won't
> have any problem in 2012.

OK... when thousands, maybe even a third of urban voters in Pennsylvania are
denied the right to vote in November, I guess they can always say that an
ignorant asshole on the internet said if they previously voted, they could
vote in 2012.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Aug 19, 2012, 10:00:11 PM8/19/12
to
On 8/19/2012 4:58 PM, Robert A. Leffingwell wrote:
>
> <Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
> news:78g238lgr33hndkmp...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:53:00 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
>> <R...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> <Yoor...@Jurgis.net> wrote in message
>>> news:efrv28d7djhvc8hl7...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:54:14 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>>>> 7/11.nig wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't matter what I think or you, it's whether you and I respect
>>>>> the meaning of citizen enough to require voter ID. I'd prefer a
>>>>> requirement of the DMV or Voter Registry require proof of citizenship
>>>>> for a voter ID. I can imagine what a commi must think about that idea,
>>>>> huh?
>>>>
>>>> So a 90 year old in a nursing home should get one?
>>>>
>>>
>>> So some dumb asshole called "yoorghis" should get one?
>>
>> If the SecState has sufficient identification to put it on a voter
>> registration supplied to Precincts...
>>
>> You have a problem with that?
>>
>
> I have a problem that about one million voters in Pennsylvania will be
> denied the right to vote.

Not concerned about any other right they have that were protected along
with their vote being protected from identity theft?


Dakota

unread,
Aug 19, 2012, 10:13:01 PM8/19/12
to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BovRXWemws

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
Aug 19, 2012, 10:44:42 PM8/19/12
to
"BeamMeUpScotty" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in
message news:50319A2B...@blackhole.nebulax.com...
>
> Not concerned about any other right they have that were protected along
> with their vote being protected from identity theft?
>

Are you concerned that about a third of Pennsylvania's urban voters will be
denied the right to vote?

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 20, 2012, 12:56:55 AM8/20/12
to
CB wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:20:00 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >>
> >> I watched the Ed Show last night, he had Al Sharpton in a lather over
> >> voter suppression. Not once did anyone mention the basic requirement
> >> to vote 'is' of proving US citizenship. The new law doesn't do that
> >> which surprises me, It only requires proper ID when voting.
> >
> >And yet, voter fraud is virtually NON EXISTENT.
> >
> >If you think otherwise, post the statistics proving it ->
>
> It doesn't matter what I think or you, it's whether you and I respect

I asked for statistics for voter fraud.

Failure to deliver noted.

> the meaning of citizen enough to require voter ID. I'd prefer a
> requirement of the DMV or Voter Registry require proof of citizenship
> for a voter ID. I can imagine what a commi must think about that idea,
> huh?

They'd use it to keep people from voting.

> >> Next year when Oboobuhcare really kicks in proper ID will be required
> >> to get hospital services, where's the horror in that requirement? We
> >> haven't gotten there yet.
> >>
> >> Sharpton and the other Progressives who don't care WHO votes as long
> >> as they vote Dim, diluting the meaning of 'citizen' by fighting
> >> against proper ID.
>
> No argument there huh commi?

No statistics for voter fraud, eh commie?

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 20, 2012, 12:57:46 AM8/20/12
to
Dakota wrote:
> On 8/19/2012 8:36 PM, Robert A. Leffingwell wrote:
> > "emoneyjoe" <emon...@iglou.com> wrote in message
> >>> "emoneyjoe" <emon...@iglou.com> wrote in message
> >
> >>> You must live in Canada or someplace where there aren't any
> >>> teabaggers.
> >>
> >> Canada voting is not the subject.
> > No, but you can vote there without a drivers license.
> >>
> >>> What you state is true in a democracy. However we are talking about
> >>> Pennsylvania where the teabaggers took control of the state
> >>> legislature.
> >>
> >> If a person voted before they probably won't
> >> have any problem in 2012.
> >
> > OK... when thousands, maybe even a third of urban voters in
> > Pennsylvania are denied the right to vote in November, I guess they
> > can always say that an ignorant asshole on the internet said if they
> > previously voted, they could vote in 2012.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BovRXWemws
http://www.politicspa.com/turzai-voter-id-law-means-romney-can-win-pa/37153/
Turzai: Voter ID Law Means Romney Can Win PA

House Majority Leader Mike Turzai (R-Allegheny) suggested that the House's
end game in passing the Voter ID law was to benefit the GOP politically.

"We are focused on making sure that we meet our obligations that we've talked
about for years," said Turzai in a speech to committee members Saturday. He
mentioned the law among a laundry list of accomplishments made by the GOP-run
legislature.

"Pro-Second Amendment? The Castle Doctrine, it's done. First pro-life
legislation – abortion facility regulations – in 22 years, done. Voter ID,
which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done."
...

The Constitution means NOTHING to these slime balls.

emoneyjoe

unread,
Aug 20, 2012, 1:31:18 AM8/20/12
to
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:36:15 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
<R...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>"emoneyjoe" <emon...@iglou.com> wrote in message
>news:902338d95ohq0pddi...@4ax.com...
>
>>>"emoneyjoe" <emon...@iglou.com> wrote in message
>
>>>You must live in Canada or someplace where there aren't any teabaggers.
>>
>> Canada voting is not the subject.
>No, but you can vote there without a drivers license.

A driver's license is not needed any place in
the US, the same office also issues picture IDs.

This is a fake issue, because the voter
registration offices will be very helpful in
finding a way for legal citizens to register.


>>>What you state is true in a democracy. However we are talking about
>>>Pennsylvania where the teabaggers took control of the state legislature.
>>
>> If a person voted before they probably won't
>> have any problem in 2012.
>
>OK... when thousands, maybe even a third of urban voters in Pennsylvania are
>denied the right to vote in November, I guess they can always say that an
>ignorant asshole on the internet said if they previously voted, they could
>vote in 2012.

They have plenty of time to register, the large
number of non-citizens is what is causing the
problem.

I took my aunt for a picture ID 20 years ago,
it was required then for the first time, and she
had no problem, she was born in 1912, in the
south, at home.







emoneyjoe

unread,
Aug 20, 2012, 3:52:08 AM8/20/12
to
Why is it only one party supporters think voter
registration should be just a claim of citizenship
without any documentation?

Do you need non-citizen votes to win, do you
need the felons votes to win, do you need the
illegal alien vote to win, do you need people
to vote more than once to win, do you need
dead people to vote to win?

This is more than just another case of
the liberal philosophy that everything and
anything is ok.


That law was passed in March, it was
a challenge to the law that was decided
by the court, allowing the law to stand.

Hasn't there been talk of other federal
laws that will require photo ID?


Any citizen of age can register to vote
and can get a photo ID, even free.


" following is taken from information posted on the Montgomery County
Voter Services web site . What forms of Photo ID will be accepted?
• A Pennsylvania driver’s license, valid or expired less than 12 months.
RELATED ASSETS
• A PennDOT ID, valid or expired less than 12 months. This ID can be
obtained for free from a PennDOT Photo Licensing Center. • A valid U.S.
Passport. (Expired passports will not be accepted.)
• A valid military dependent’s ID. (Expired IDs will not be accepted.)
• A valid active duty or retired U.S. military ID, including PA National
Guard.
• A valid ID issued by a Pennsylvania university, college, seminary,
community college or two-year college. The ID can be for students,
faculty, employees and alumni. (Expired IDs will not be accepted.)"

• A valid ID issued by a Pennsylvania care facility, such as a long-term
care nursing facility, assisted living residence or a personal care
home. (Expired IDs will not be accepted.)
What do you need to get a free Penndot Photo ID Card?
• Social Security Card
• One of the following: a) a birth certificate with raised seal; b) or a
valid passport; or c) certificate of naturalization; or d) certificate
of U.S. citizenship. • Two proofs of residency, such as lease
agreements, current utility bills, mortgage documents, W-2 forms, tax
records (cell phone bills are not acceptable.)
• A signed oath that the voter does not possess Voter ID. (Form
available at PennDOT center or on-line.)
• Completed application form. (Form available at PennDOT center or
on-line.)
Some things you ought to know
• If you had a PA Driver’s License or PennDOT ID at one time, but it is
now expired past the one-year deadline, your information may still be in
their database so it may not be necessary to bring all the documentation
listed above. To determine if your information is still on file, call
PennDOT at 1-800-932-4600. • If you were born in Pennsylvania but do not
have your birth certificate with raised seal, you can go to a PennDOT
photo licensing center and fill out a “Request for Certification of
Birth Record for Voter ID Purposes Only” form (HDO1546F) and your
request will be forwarded to the Pennsylvania Department of Health to
certify your birth record. It should take about 10 days and is free of
charge.
• You can call 1-800-932-4600 or visit www.dmv.state.pa.us to located
the PennDOT Photo Licensing Center nearest you. • If you intend to vote
by absentee ballot, you may provide either the last four digits of your
Social Security Number, or your driver’s license/PennDOT ID number as
proof of identification on the absentee application. If you cannot
provide either of these items, you must enclose a photo copy of one of
the acceptable IDs listed above.
• Qualified absentee voters in the U.S. military (and their dependents),
as well as other U.S. citizens living abroad, are exempt from having to
provide proof of their identity with the absentee ballot applications. "






Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 20, 2012, 5:48:04 AM8/20/12
to
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 22:56:55 -0600, RichTravsky
<traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>CB wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 21:20:00 -0600, RichTravsky
>> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I watched the Ed Show last night, he had Al Sharpton in a lather over
>> >> voter suppression. Not once did anyone mention the basic requirement
>> >> to vote 'is' of proving US citizenship. The new law doesn't do that
>> >> which surprises me, It only requires proper ID when voting.
>> >
>> >And yet, voter fraud is virtually NON EXISTENT.
>> >
>> >If you think otherwise, post the statistics proving it ->
>>
>> It doesn't matter what I think or you, it's whether you and I respect
>
>I asked for statistics for voter fraud.

Get them your self, you're a manish boi arn't you?

>
>Failure to deliver noted.

Strawman noted

>
>> the meaning of citizen enough to require voter ID. I'd prefer a
>> requirement of the DMV or Voter Registry require proof of citizenship
>> for a voter ID. I can imagine what a commi must think about that idea,
>> huh?
>
>They'd use it to keep people from voting.

What kind of people? The kind of people that don't have a SS#?

>
>> >> Next year when Oboobuhcare really kicks in proper ID will be required
>> >> to get hospital services, where's the horror in that requirement? We
>> >> haven't gotten there yet.
>> >>
>> >> Sharpton and the other Progressives who don't care WHO votes as long
>> >> as they vote Dim, diluting the meaning of 'citizen' by fighting
>> >> against proper ID.
>>
>> No argument there huh commi?
>
>No statistics for voter fraud, eh commie?

Prove your a US citizen and you can get a voter ID, if not...hit the
road.

>
>> >> There argument falls flat when one considers the requirements
>> >> responsible living has on obtaining a drivers licence, getting food
>> >> stamps, getting WICA, housing and renting a TV.
>> >>
>> >> Voter ID should be a federal law!

I like your kinda thinking CB

Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 20, 2012, 5:50:24 AM8/20/12
to
Did SEIU and ACORN record that statistic in the 2010 census?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 21, 2012, 11:02:02 PM8/21/12
to
Another con-servative who can't show ANY voter fraud statistics.

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 21, 2012, 11:30:07 PM8/21/12
to
I'll ask again: statistics for voter fraud ->

> >> >> There argument falls flat when one considers the requirements
> >> >> responsible living has on obtaining a drivers licence, getting food
> >> >> stamps, getting WICA, housing and renting a TV.
> >> >>
> >> >> Voter ID should be a federal law!
>
> I like your kinda thinking CB

A bigot's thinking

Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 21, 2012, 11:37:22 PM8/21/12
to
There'll be even fewer once all the states require proper ID

Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 21, 2012, 11:41:36 PM8/21/12
to
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:30:07 -0600, RichTravsky
The issue is proving you're a US citizen, not whether statistics that
Eric (sic) Holder controls are gibbin too (sic) MSNBC.

Prove your a US citizen and you can get a voter ID, if not...hit the
road.


>
>> >> >> There argument falls flat when one considers the requirements
>> >> >> responsible living has on obtaining a drivers licence, getting food
>> >> >> stamps, getting WICA, housing and renting a TV.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Voter ID should be a federal law!
>>
>> I like your kinda thinking CB

Me too

emoneyjoe

unread,
Aug 22, 2012, 6:05:19 PM8/22/12
to
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:02:02 -0600, RichTravsky
<traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> > legislation – abortion facility regulations – in 22 years, done. Voter ID,
>> > which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done."
>> > ...
>> >
>> >The Constitution means NOTHING to these slime balls.
>>
>> Why is it only one party supporters think voter
>> registration should be just a claim of citizenship
>> without any documentation?
>>
>
>Another con-servative who can't show ANY voter fraud statistics.

Why would fraud be a factor, proof of residence
is needed to make sure voters vote in the proper
district and precinct.
Proof is needed to prove they are of age,

Claims that no fraud exists are either lies
or made in ignorance of facts,

Voting registration must follow the law as
written, any disagreement with the laws can
not be resolved any place but in the courts
well in advance.

http://buckyville.yuku.com/topic/54937/MN-voter-fraud-leads--177-convictions-1099-felons-voted-ill?page=-1

http://www.brennancenter.org/content/section/category/voting_after_criminal_conviction

http://www.minnesotamajority.org/Home/tabid/112/EntryID/375/Default.aspx

http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/2012/apr/17/greg-abbott/greg-abbott-claims-50-election-fraud-convictions-2/

http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA635.html

http://specfriggintacular.wordpress.com/2012/04/03/democrats-arrested-andor-convicted-of-voter-fraud/

12,100,000 hits

http://www.google.com/#q=vote*+fraud+%2B++%22convictions%22&hl=en&prmd=imvnsu&ei=NVY1UMShEYnA8ASKmYDoAg&start=20&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=a6c4840780f4582e&biw=1012&bih=563


Please get your mommy to show you how to
search the web for facts.








RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 25, 2012, 1:31:55 AM8/25/12
to
That's what these CONservatives claim they are protecting against - fraud.

Only, it's practically non existent among the MILLIONS of votes cast over
election after election after election.

Percentage wise, how many zeros after the decimal point is that? Eh?


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?pagewanted=all

Five years after the Bush administration began a crackdown on voter fraud,
the Justice Department has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized
effort to skew federal elections, according to court records and interviews.

Although Republican activists have repeatedly said fraud is so widespread
that it has corrupted the political process and, possibly, cost the party
election victories, about 120 people have been charged and 86 convicted as
of last year.
...


RT

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 25, 2012, 1:32:59 AM8/25/12
to
Fewer than almost zero?

hahahahahahah!


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?pagewanted=all

Five years after the Bush administration began a crackdown on voter fraud,
the Justice Department has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized
effort to skew federal elections, according to court records and interviews.

Although Republican activists have repeatedly said fraud is so widespread
that it has corrupted the political process and, possibly, cost the party
election victories, about 120 people have been charged and 86 convicted as
of last year.
...

Care to try again?

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 25, 2012, 1:46:04 AM8/25/12
to
So, you STILL can't make a case for it, eh?

Maybe this will help:

emoneyjoe

unread,
Aug 25, 2012, 3:13:24 AM8/25/12
to
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 23:31:55 -0600, RichTravsky
>> >> > legislation – abortion facility regulations – in 22 years, done. Voter ID,
>> >> > which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done."
>> >> > ...
>> >> >
>> >> >The Constitution means NOTHING to these slime balls.
>> >>
>> >> Why is it only one party supporters think voter
>> >> registration should be just a claim of citizenship
>> >> without any documentation?
>> >
>> >Another con-servative who can't show ANY voter fraud statistics.
>>
>> Why would fraud be a factor, proof of residence
>
>That's what these CONservatives claim they are protecting against - fraud.

Again, you miss the point (but you weren't aiming
at it, were you?).

All registrations have to be checked, voters
have no way of knowing where to vote until
they register and get a card in the mail.


>Only, it's practically non existent among the MILLIONS of votes cast over
>election after election after election.

The amount of fraud is not at issue, having
legal voters voting in the proper precinct is.


>Percentage wise, how many zeros after the decimal point is that? Eh?
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html?pagewanted=all
>
> Five years after the Bush administration began a crackdown on voter fraud,
> the Justice Department has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized
> effort to skew federal elections, according to court records and interviews.
>
> Although Republican activists have repeatedly said fraud is so widespread
> that it has corrupted the political process and, possibly, cost the party
> election victories, about 120 people have been charged and 86 convicted as
> of last year.
> ...
>
>
>RT

Waiting until after the election to look for
fraud or mistakes just doesn't work, if a voter
moves, they have to register the new address.

Culling the voter list in each precinct is a
bigger problem than you think, people move
away and die, and the registration list needs
to be corrected constantly.

In some locations the precinct workers
may know most of the voters, in others, they
may not.

Next the liberals will want to make it
so a voter can just ask somebody else to
go vote for him.








RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 27, 2012, 1:02:34 AM8/27/12
to
> Waiting until after the election to look for
> fraud or mistakes just doesn't work, if a voter
> moves, they have to register the new address.

Wasting time and money on a non existent problem doesn't work.

emoneyjoe

unread,
Aug 27, 2012, 1:55:44 AM8/27/12
to
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 23:02:34 -0600, RichTravsky
>> >> >> > legislation – abortion facility regulations – in 22 years, done. Voter ID,
Checking and culling registrations is an ongoing
thing, because people move, die, go to prison, and
the records need to constantly maintained.

I didn't register, but when I renewed my driver's
license, I was registered automatically.

Obamas Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 27, 2012, 9:28:49 AM8/27/12
to
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:45:00 -0600, RichTravsky
<traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>> Though I keep hearing stories about how so many millions of eligible
>> citizens are being denied the right to vote for lack of proper
>> identification, I have yet to see the left present a *SINGLE* one.
>
>What stories ->

Exactly

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 28, 2012, 11:05:53 PM8/28/12
to
Not the same thing.

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 28, 2012, 11:41:29 PM8/28/12
to
C...@prayforme.com wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:45:00 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
So you admit there isn't any fraud. Good. There's hope for you.

PS - next time read for comprehension.

Obamas Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 29, 2012, 9:37:56 AM8/29/12
to
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:05:53 -0600, RichTravsky
No ID, no MD 20/20
No ID, not ballot foe you
Comprende, yoo?

Obamas Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 29, 2012, 9:44:07 AM8/29/12
to
There won't be any stories because EVERYONE will have to prove through
proper ID they are who they say they are when attempting to vote

>PS - next time read for comprehension.

Next time show proper ID, comprende essay?
Message has been deleted

Obamas Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 29, 2012, 12:51:54 PM8/29/12
to
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:26:20 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:44:07 -0400, Obamas Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>>> >> Though I keep hearing stories about how so many millions of eligible
>>>> >> citizens are being denied the right to vote for lack of proper
>>>> >> identification, I have yet to see the left present a *SINGLE* one.
>>>> >
>>>> >What stories ->
>>>>
>>>> Exactly
>>>
>>>So you admit there isn't any fraud. Good. There's hope for you.
>>>
>>
>>There won't be any stories because EVERYONE will have to prove through
>>proper ID they are who they say they are when attempting to vote
>
>THey cannot vote unless the Secretary of their state CONFIRMS they
>have a right to vote when they REGISTER.

What's to prevent a homie from scaning an electricity bill and powuh
bill then forge some other homies name in Photoshop that ACORN/SEIU
fraudulently made up foe duh steal a vote?

All a homey would habs duh do is tuh slide into said precinct and whip
outs duh powuh bill to show residency...boom...homie voted.


>
>Proving you're a REGISTERED VOTER should only require proof you are
>who the REGISTERED VOTER is in the SecState voter lists provided to
>the voting precinct you belong to.
>
>>>PS - next time read for comprehension.
>>
>>Next time show proper ID, comprende essay?
>
>Why wouldn't any ID be accepted if the SECSTATE approved your voting
>qualifications?

See above, homie
Message has been deleted

Obamas Legion of Flash Mobs

unread,
Aug 29, 2012, 10:04:01 PM8/29/12
to
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:08:23 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:51:54 -0400, Obamas Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>>>There won't be any stories because EVERYONE will have to prove through
>>>>proper ID they are who they say they are when attempting to vote
>>>
>>>THey cannot vote unless the Secretary of their state CONFIRMS they
>>>have a right to vote when they REGISTER.
>>
>>What's to prevent a homie from scaning an electricity bill and powuh
>>bill then forge some other homies name in Photoshop that ACORN/SEIU
>>fraudulently made up foe duh steal a vote?
>
>Because the secretary of state won't allow that.
>
>Registration gets you on the voting rolls
>
>You must have VALID identification to set up that registration.

No you dun't, ACORN/SEIU registered crack heads off duh street.

>(that's why NONE of the ACORN registrations EVER got past the first
>step, ya idiot)

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...Not when they also work at DimocRAT run
Precincts.

But not to worry, Repuvlicans changed all that in 29 states!

>
>How does one know what name/address/DOB/ to "Forge" prior to going
>into a polling place....you must present identification---BEFORE the
>poll watchers open the book and look for your name.
>
>The information in the precinct voter rolls cannot be seen prior to
>voting.

No kidding...

>
>IDIOT

Listen..., Anyone can register voters on the street, ACORN/SEIU 'did'
it all the time. Some homeless peapoe got crack and MD for
registering, you know that. So when the homie goes to vote all he habs
to show is a local powuh bill. In a questionablly honest precienct
(Miami/Dade during Bush vs. Gore) who knows how many times a homie's
allowed to vote?
Message has been deleted

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 31, 2012, 11:33:48 PM8/31/12
to
Huh? Buying booze is the same as voting? Well, maybe in your hick
trailer park...

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 31, 2012, 11:39:23 PM8/31/12
to
Obamas, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:41:29 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >C...@prayforme.com wrote:
> >> On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:45:00 -0600, RichTravsky
> >> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
There aren't any stories *now*...

RichTravsky

unread,
Aug 31, 2012, 11:40:21 PM8/31/12
to
Obamas, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:26:20 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:44:07 -0400, Obamas Legion of Flash Mobs @
> >7/11.nig wrote:
> >
> >>>> >> Though I keep hearing stories about how so many millions of eligible
> >>>> >> citizens are being denied the right to vote for lack of proper
> >>>> >> identification, I have yet to see the left present a *SINGLE* one.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >What stories ->
> >>>>
> >>>> Exactly
> >>>
> >>>So you admit there isn't any fraud. Good. There's hope for you.
> >>>
> >>
> >>There won't be any stories because EVERYONE will have to prove through
> >>proper ID they are who they say they are when attempting to vote
> >
> >THey cannot vote unless the Secretary of their state CONFIRMS they
> >have a right to vote when they REGISTER.
>
> What's to prevent a homie from scaning an electricity bill and powuh

There's been nothing to stop anybody, even hicks like you, from doing
this for the last 15 or 20 years. And it hasn't happened.
0 new messages