Bush blames Clinton. Bwaaahahahahahahaha.
Harry Hope
Bush Derides Clinton's Mideast Work
Fri Apr 5, 8:25 PM ET
By RON FOURNIER, AP White House Correspondent
CRAWFORD, Texas -
President Bush says the Mideast summit sponsored by former President
Clinton resulted in a "significant intefadeh," or uprising, repeating
an accusation his press secretary got in trouble for uttering.
............................................................................................
From The Washington Post, 3/30/02:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37986-2002Mar29.html
By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 30, 2002; Page A04
CRAWFORD, Tex. --
As Israeli troops and tanks stormed Yasser Arafat's compound today,
President Bush played with his dogs, went for a jog and worked around
his ranch.
With tensions rising and other world leaders speaking out, Bush's
aides stalled, initially saying they were deciding what to say, then
declaring in their first official statement that they were monitoring
and assessing the situation.
________________________________________________
Bwahahahahahaha. 'Nuff Said.
Harry
Harry Hope
wrote:
The li'l weasel's too much. I was laughing so hard I forgot to post
the source.
From The Associated Press, 4/5/02:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=536&ncid=703&e=1&u=/ap/20020406/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_clinton_2
Bill Mulcahy
"Harry Hope" <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3cae5b31....@nntp.ix.netcom.com...
> On Sat, 06 Apr 2002 02:18:02 GMT, riv...@ix.netcom.com (Harry Hope)
> wrote:
>
> The li'l weasel's too much. I was laughing so hard I forgot to post
> the source.
Unfortunately he's our president. So I guess the jokes on us.
Bill Mulcahy
Dwayne Conyers
from head to toe...
--
Dwacon Entertainment presents:
Hillary Clinton's congressional striptease
http://www.dwacon.com
George Spelvin
> >By Mike Allen
> >Washington Post Staff Writer
> >
> >Saturday, March 30, 2002; Page A04
> >
> >CRAWFORD, Tex. --
> >
> >As Israeli troops and tanks stormed Yasser Arafat's compound today,
> >President Bush played with his dogs, went for a jog and worked around
> >his ranch.
And he has the nerve to say, "I expect leadership." I'd laugh if so
many people weren't being killed because of HIS lack of leadership.
_____________
"I cannot support this military action in the Persian Gulf at this
time."--Trent Lott, 1998
"How dare Senator Daschle criticize President Bush while we are fighting
our war on terrorism, especially when we have troops in the field!"--
Trent Lott, 2002
"People want a president who says what he means and means what he
says."--G.W.Bush
"I am here to make an announcement that this Thursday, ticket counters
and airplanes will fly out of Ronald Reagan Airport."--G.W.Bush
George Spelvin
> >
> >By RON FOURNIER, AP White House Correspondent
> >
> >CRAWFORD, Texas -
> >
> >President Bush says the Mideast summit sponsored by former President
> >Clinton resulted in a "significant intefadeh," or uprising, repeating
> >an accusation his press secretary got in trouble for uttering.
Nothing but an ignorant attempt to deflect attention away from his total
lack of leadership. Bill Clinton caused no violence in the Middle
East. People in the Middle East caused the violence and Clinton
actually got out of his pickup and tried to help.
The "intefadeh" started after Sharon walked his fat ass on the temple
mount and taunted the Palestinians. Sharon has never wanted a
Palestinian state. Some Palestinians don't want to recognize Israel.
If nothing is done to stop the violence those extremists (on both sides)
will continue to kill innocent civilians. Bush has the power to make
the situation better, but he refuses. I wonder why? What profit could
there be?
Tom Snyder
deserve to be here.
"George Spelvin" <spe...@everywhere.edu> wrote in message
news:3CAEF66D...@everywhere.edu...
Safe as Milk
<spe...@everywhere.edu> wrote:
Easy to surmise...
Bush wants the Isrealis to use Palestinian terrorists as an example of
what happens to the Axis of Evil when they are up against the Hogs of
Oil.
What the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians is Bushie's wet dream
for what he'd like to do with Al-Qaeda. Bush lives vicariously through
Sharon.
E. K.
--
Visit PS Mueller's cartoon site.
http://www.psmueller.com
Aaron Hirshberg
> Bush Derides Clinton's Mideast Work
>
> Fri Apr 5, 8:25 PM ET
>
> By RON FOURNIER, AP White House Correspondent
>
> CRAWFORD, Texas -
>
> President Bush says the Mideast summit sponsored by former President
> Clinton resulted in a "significant intefadeh," or uprising, repeating
> an accusation his press secretary got in trouble for uttering.
>
>
> ............................................................................................
>
> From The Washington Post, 3/30/02:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37986-2002Mar29.html
>
>
> By Mike Allen
> Washington Post Staff Writer
>
> Saturday, March 30, 2002; Page A04
>
> CRAWFORD, Tex. --
>
> As Israeli troops and tanks stormed Yasser Arafat's compound today,
> President Bush played with his dogs, went for a jog and worked around
> his ranch.
What's new? In 1991, while the UN was preparing for the Gulf War,
Bush the elder was riding around in his cigarette boat!
> With tensions rising and other world leaders speaking out, Bush's
> aides stalled, initially saying they were deciding what to say, then
> declaring in their first official statement that they were monitoring
> and assessing the situation.
>
> ________________________________________________
>
> Bwahahahahahaha. 'Nuff Said.
Totally. I have also seen some right wing crap on the net lately that
blamed Carter for the Marine barracks bombing in Beirut!
Aaron Hirshberg
David Lentz
George Spelvin wrote:
<snip>
> Nothing but an ignorant attempt to deflect attention away from his total
> lack of leadership. Bill Clinton caused no violence in the Middle
> East. People in the Middle East caused the violence and Clinton
> actually got out of his pickup and tried to help.
>
> The "intefadeh" started after Sharon walked his fat ass on the temple
> mount and taunted the Palestinians. Sharon has never wanted a
> Palestinian state. Some Palestinians don't want to recognize Israel.
> If nothing is done to stop the violence those extremists (on both sides)
> will continue to kill innocent civilians. Bush has the power to make
> the situation better, but he refuses. I wonder why? What profit could
> there be?
What did the most pro terrorist President of all time, B.J.
Clinton, ever do to promote peace anywhere. Clinton treated
Yassar Afrafat not at the terrorist he was, and is, but some
kind of respectable leader. It was Clinton who wined and dined
Arafat at the White House and treated him like royalty.
In stark contrast, President George W. Bush is putting
expectations on both Israel and the Palestians. Bush had made it
clear that Israel should disengage from Palestine areas and that
Palestinian leadership should step up to stop the Palestian
violence. Note that Bush did not restrict his call for Palestian
leadership to Arafat. Bush has made it clear, as Clinton never
did, that peace require action from both sides.
Clinton made the mistake of assuming, or pretending, that Arafat
was the key to Middle East peace. It becoming increasingly
clear that Arafat is not the key to peace but rather a
distraction from peace.
David
--
qyra...@ebpurfgre.ee.pbz
Cisco Kid
"Bill Mulcahy" <wmul...@hvc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:wnur8.31575$GF1.5...@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com...
I don't know - I didn't vote for him and I understand he actually finished
2nd in the last election.
Patrick Finucane
> Bush Derides Clinton's Mideast Work
Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden Of Eden after being tempted by Bill Clinton. For
references, see the Bible.
Thumper
wrote:
>This is outrageous. Why don't you people just leave the U.S. You don't
>deserve to be here.
>
>
Deserve to be here? Screw you.
Thumper
Brian Damage
pathetic
Brian Damage
Hmmm, I didn't see any mention if President Clinton in the Bible, but
there was something about a Burning Bush.
Prophet
wrote:
Was is a suggestion?
Prophet
"Do it in the name of heaven you can justify it in the end"
One Tin Soldier, Theme from "Billy Jack"
Cognitus
>
> > >By Mike Allen
> > >Washington Post Staff Writer
> > >
> > >Saturday, March 30, 2002; Page A04
> > >
> > >CRAWFORD, Tex. --
> > >
> > >As Israeli troops and tanks stormed Yasser Arafat's compound today,
> > >President Bush played with his dogs, went for a jog and worked around
> > >his ranch.
He enjoys those rare occasions when he's with things he's smarter
than -- like
his dogs. I'm not sure what Bush's IQ is but I would be willing to
conjecture that it's about
Two-Dogs worth.
Cognitus
"Tom Snyder" <titu...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:8VCr8.1466$iG4.72...@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> This is outrageous. Why don't you people just leave the U.S. You don't
> deserve to be here.
After YOU!!!!
Marie Jordan
Well that's our appointed President, a sorry, petty little dimwit.
You can be sure Georgie and his handlers have a "blame Clinton" story
ready if an alien spaceship lands on the White House lawn tomorrow.
D.G. Porter
>
>
> If nothing is done to stop the violence those extremists (on both sides)
> will continue to kill innocent civilians. Bush has the power to make
> the situation better, but he refuses. I wonder why? What profit could
> there be?
Re-selection in 2004.
D.G. Porter
>
> This is outrageous. Why don't you people just leave the U.S. You don't
> deserve to be here.
MAKE US, you little fucking pip-squeak.
BitHead
<dgpo...@SENDMENOSPAMpacbell.naught> wrote:
>Tom Snyder wrote:
>>
>> This is outrageous. Why don't you people just leave the U.S. You don't
>> deserve to be here.
>
>MAKE US, you little fucking pip-squeak.
It's going to happen. The people are already pissed off about idiots
like you enough to do exactly that.
BitHead
The battle has been raging for over 2000 years.
So Bush is supposed to solve the issue r he falls short of your
expectations?
LOL!
SteveL
D.G. Porter
You're pretty stupid for someone who pretends he writes professionally.
Smirk is going to play this out until November 2004 and appeal to our
"patriotism" to re-select him.
D.G. Porter
Yeah, riiiight. You just fucking TRY IT, you little twerp. Love to see
you try. I'll chew you up and spit you out.
"The people"? HA HA HA HA! You mean "A few LOONIES"!
Thumper
wrote:
Solve the issue? He has exacerbated the problem. Despite warnings
from our allys that the U.S. needed a hands on approach he announced
shortly after coming into office that he was going to leave the
situation to the folks in the region. Violence has escalated since
then to the point that it could spark a WWIII.
Thumper
Thumper
wrote:
>On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 00:29:51 GMT, "D.G. Porter"
You mean the fascists that only believe in freedom of speech as long
as you speak what they want to hear. We'll never allow this country
to be taken over by fascists Bitbrain.
Thumper
BitHead
>>>> This is outrageous. Why don't you people just leave the U.S. You don't
>>>> deserve to be here.
>>>
>>>MAKE US, you little fucking pip-squeak.
>>
>>It's going to happen. The people are already pissed off about idiots
>>like you enough to do exactly that.
>>
>>
>You mean the fascists that only believe in freedom of speech as long
>as you speak what they want to hear. We'll never allow this country
>to be taken over by fascists Bitbrain.
This from the supporters of Bill Clinton, and Al Gore.
(shake of the head)
BitHead
<dgpo...@SENDMENOSPAMpacbell.naught> wrote:
Amazing; you dound just like a 13 year old who has had their ass
backed into a corner.
BitHead
wrote:
>On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 01:53:44 GMT, bit...@rochester.rr.com (BitHead)
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 00:29:51 GMT, "D.G. Porter"
>><dgpo...@SENDMENOSPAMpacbell.naught> wrote:
>>
>>>Tom Snyder wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is outrageous. Why don't you people just leave the U.S. You don't
>>>> deserve to be here.
>>>
>>>MAKE US, you little fucking pip-squeak.
>>
>>It's going to happen. The people are already pissed off about idiots
>>like you enough to do exactly that.
>>
>>
>
>Will you approve?
Of intent? Certainly. Of tactics? Depends.
BitHead
>>>> If nothing is done to stop the violence those extremists (on both sides)
>>>> will continue to kill innocent civilians. Bush has the power to make
>>>> the situation better, but he refuses. I wonder why? What profit could
>>>> there be?
>>>
>>>Re-selection in 2004.
>>
>>
>>The battle has been raging for over 2000 years.
>>So Bush is supposed to solve the issue r he falls short of your
>>expectations?
>>
>>LOL!
>>
>Solve the issue? He has exacerbated the problem. Despite warnings
>from our allys that the U.S. needed a hands on approach he announced
>shortly after coming into office that he was going to leave the
>situation to the folks in the region. Violence has escalated since
>then to the point that it could spark a WWIII.
Hands on? You mean like Clinton?
Are you running on a borrowed IQ today?
BitHead
<dgpo...@SENDMENOSPAMpacbell.naught> wrote:
>BitHead wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 00:27:00 GMT, "D.G. Porter"
>> <dgpo...@SENDMENOSPAMpacbell.naught> wrote:
>>
>> >George Spelvin wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If nothing is done to stop the violence those extremists (on both sides)
>> >> will continue to kill innocent civilians. Bush has the power to make
>> >> the situation better, but he refuses. I wonder why? What profit could
>> >> there be?
>> >
>> >Re-selection in 2004.
>>
>> The battle has been raging for over 2000 years.
>> So Bush is supposed to solve the issue r he falls short of your
>> expectations?
>
>You're pretty stupid for someone who pretends he writes professionally.
I KNOW YOU are running on a borrowed IQ. Were I you, I'd give it
back. It's not helping you.
>Smirk is going to play this out until November 2004 and appeal to our
>"patriotism" to re-select him.
Yeah, right. I'll be reminding you of this one.
rand mair fheal
so im a traitor a terrorist and an unpleasant person
so what?
do you really think thats going to stop me from voting in november?
Thumper
wrote:
>On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 02:45:37 GMT, "D.G. Porter"
><dgpo...@SENDMENOSPAMpacbell.naught> wrote:
>
>>BitHead wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 07 Apr 2002 00:29:51 GMT, "D.G. Porter"
>>> <dgpo...@SENDMENOSPAMpacbell.naught> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Tom Snyder wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> This is outrageous. Why don't you people just leave the U.S. You don't
>>> >> deserve to be here.
>>> >
>>> >MAKE US, you little fucking pip-squeak.
>>>
>>> It's going to happen. The people are already pissed off about idiots
>>> like you enough to do exactly that.
>>
>>Yeah, riiiight. You just fucking TRY IT, you little twerp. Love to see
>>you try. I'll chew you up and spit you out.
>>"The people"? HA HA HA HA! You mean "A few LOONIES"!
>
>Amazing; you dound just like a 13 year old who has had their ass
>backed into a corner.
>
You should be an authority on 13 year olds. They are exactly at your
level of intelectual development.
Thumper
Thumper
wrote:
That must have hurt with your head being that far up your ass.
Thumper
Donovan Rebbechi
> What did the most pro terrorist President of all time, B.J.
> Clinton, ever do to promote peace anywhere.
What did he do ? He tirelessly worked on achieving peace in the Middle East
while the Republicans discussed his sex life.
> Clinton treated Yassar Afrafat not at the terrorist he was, and is, but some
> kind of respectable leader. It was Clinton who wined and dined Arafat at the
> White House and treated him like royalty.
Are we back to this "treated like royalty" rubbish ?
> In stark contrast,
The "stark contrast" is between Sharons and Baraks policy.
> President George W. Bush is putting expectations on both Israel and the
> Palestians.
Please enumerate some of these "stark contrasts". In particular, what is
your basis for the assertion that CLinton didn't "put expectations" on the
Palestinians ?
> violence. Note that Bush did not restrict his call for Palestian
> leadership to Arafat. Bush has made it clear, as Clinton never
> did, that peace require action from both sides.
Not true. Clinton worked tirelessly to facilitate dialogue, and try to get
both sides to come to make some serious commitments to peace. Arafat chose
not to accept the terms put to him.
> Clinton made the mistake of assuming, or pretending, that Arafat
> was the key to Middle East peace.
This was not Clintons choice to make. Clintons job was to facilitate the
negotiations, not to tell Israel how it should conduct its foreign policy, or
who Israel should negotiate with. Wouldn't it be awfully stupid for the Clinton
whitehouse to anger the Arab world, undermine both Israel and the Palestinians,
and sabotage peace negotiations by saying that they didn't want to talk to the
recognised (by the Israeli government, and the rest of the world) Palestinian
leader ?
The fallacy of your argument is that you are not looking at the policy of
either administrations in the context of other factors, including the level of
violence, the policy of the Israeli leadership, and the status of negotiations.
--
Donovan
