Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Susan Wood Proves that Women Should Not Be On Company Boards
3 views
Skip to first unread message
zohrab
May 9, 2013, 1:10:53 PM5/9/13
to
On Sunday 5th May 2013, TV One's Q+A programme put on a feminist
activist item about getting more women on company boards. It was a
feminist activist item, because it had no pro-male activists, such as
myself, presenting an alternative view. However, that feminist
activist item was proof in itself how vital it is to keep women off
company boards. The point is that Susan Wood is not paid by taxpayers
and advertising revenue to pursue her private political agenda. She
is supposed to be providing a service to the public of New Zealand.
Since she is a journalist, we can see what she is doing, but in the
case of women on boards, it will be hard to see when/if they use their
positions to push feminist agendas, to the detriment of men.
This was not an isolated example, by any means! I have several
webpages about such journalistic bias -- see Issues: Media Bias and
Media Bias (resources) , which are just a small selection from the
files I have kept on examples of feminist media bias, which themselves
are only a small selection of those which have occurred over the past
decades. For example, TV 3's morning programme, Firstline, is fronted
by Rachel Smalley, who used to use the programme, on a regular basis,
as the propaganda arm of the New Zealand women's movement. Radio New
Zealand does the same in its news bulletins and in other programmes
such as Nine-to-Noon and Kim Hill's Saturday morning programme. Chris
Laidlaw used to have a pro-men slot on his Sunday morning programme,
until (as I had predicted to him) he got "castrated", so to speak.
I's not that the men in the media are much better -- partly because
they would not have got anywhere unless they had been feminists, and
partly because they work in a feminist environment, which rubs off on
them. For example, Susan Wood's predecessor, Paul Holmes, once told
me he was no longer going to read my emails, because they were all
about men. Of course the rest of television was more or less all
about women, but he did not have the brains or the bravery to see
that. It serves him right that he died partly because of prostate
cancer, seeing that he did nothing about that, or any othe men's
issue, unless and until it started to affect him!
I have plenty of experience of dealing with women in positions of
authority which I could mention, but I want to keep this short. The
point is, women should be kept out of positions of authority if they
keep using their positions to push political, anti-male agendas. Of
course, they say that they are only trying to achieve "equality", but
that is a blatant lie, as we can see by how Susan Wood behaves in
practice. What has Susan Wood done to reduce male suicide numbers,
conscript women into wars, increase female workplace fatalities to
match the male fatality numbers, increase male sole custody to match
female sole custody, increase the numbers of male teachers or of male
university students, or increase male longevity to match female
longevity - and so on and so forth!
Peter Zohrab
activist item about getting more women on company boards. It was a
feminist activist item, because it had no pro-male activists, such as
myself, presenting an alternative view. However, that feminist
activist item was proof in itself how vital it is to keep women off
company boards. The point is that Susan Wood is not paid by taxpayers
and advertising revenue to pursue her private political agenda. She
is supposed to be providing a service to the public of New Zealand.
Since she is a journalist, we can see what she is doing, but in the
case of women on boards, it will be hard to see when/if they use their
positions to push feminist agendas, to the detriment of men.
This was not an isolated example, by any means! I have several
webpages about such journalistic bias -- see Issues: Media Bias and
Media Bias (resources) , which are just a small selection from the
files I have kept on examples of feminist media bias, which themselves
are only a small selection of those which have occurred over the past
decades. For example, TV 3's morning programme, Firstline, is fronted
by Rachel Smalley, who used to use the programme, on a regular basis,
as the propaganda arm of the New Zealand women's movement. Radio New
Zealand does the same in its news bulletins and in other programmes
such as Nine-to-Noon and Kim Hill's Saturday morning programme. Chris
Laidlaw used to have a pro-men slot on his Sunday morning programme,
until (as I had predicted to him) he got "castrated", so to speak.
I's not that the men in the media are much better -- partly because
they would not have got anywhere unless they had been feminists, and
partly because they work in a feminist environment, which rubs off on
them. For example, Susan Wood's predecessor, Paul Holmes, once told
me he was no longer going to read my emails, because they were all
about men. Of course the rest of television was more or less all
about women, but he did not have the brains or the bravery to see
that. It serves him right that he died partly because of prostate
cancer, seeing that he did nothing about that, or any othe men's
issue, unless and until it started to affect him!
I have plenty of experience of dealing with women in positions of
authority which I could mention, but I want to keep this short. The
point is, women should be kept out of positions of authority if they
keep using their positions to push political, anti-male agendas. Of
course, they say that they are only trying to achieve "equality", but
that is a blatant lie, as we can see by how Susan Wood behaves in
practice. What has Susan Wood done to reduce male suicide numbers,
conscript women into wars, increase female workplace fatalities to
match the male fatality numbers, increase male sole custody to match
female sole custody, increase the numbers of male teachers or of male
university students, or increase male longevity to match female
longevity - and so on and so forth!
Peter Zohrab
zohrab
May 9, 2013, 1:14:34 PM5/9/13
to
Miising urls from my original post:
http://equality.coolpage.biz/ismedia.html
http://equality.coolpage.biz/mediares.html
http://tvnz.co.nz/q-and-a-news/panel-men-women-in-business-video-5428282
Peter Zohrab
http://equality.coolpage.biz/ismedia.html
http://equality.coolpage.biz/mediares.html
http://tvnz.co.nz/q-and-a-news/panel-men-women-in-business-video-5428282
Peter Zohrab
𝓣𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓖𝓻��𝓪𝓽
May 9, 2013, 3:42:46 PM5/9/13
to
On 05/09/2013 01:10 PM, zohrab wrote:
> On Sunday 5th May 2013, TV One's Q+A programme put on a feminist
> activist item about getting more women on company boards. It was a
> feminist activist item, because it had no pro-male activists, such as
> myself, presenting an alternative view.
The reason that you don't get invited is because you aren't a pro-male
> On Sunday 5th May 2013, TV One's Q+A programme put on a feminist
> activist item about getting more women on company boards. It was a
> feminist activist item, because it had no pro-male activists, such as
> myself, presenting an alternative view.
activist. You aren't pro-anything. Nor, do you have an alternative view.
You're simply another reactionary clown - like shock jock Paul Elam. You
want to be controversial and generate ratings by getting people worked
up and chasing their own tails.
Getting your own face on the shows is the only thing that you are
interested in - and, they know it. They're not going to give a
detractor (a troll) free air time to make tedious, rambling statements
which have no point WRT to public policy or solutions. They're waiting
for a real MRA to come along, with something cohesive, consistent and
contributory to say.
...That sure isn't you irrelevant whiners.
> Peter Zohrab
>
- - -
Loved by few. Hated by many. Envied by all:
Turin
I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/turin_turambar ∞
http://groups.google.com/group/Men_First/ ♂
https://profiles.google.com/TurinTurambar.1/ ⚕
------------------------
"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."
-----
0 new messages