Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: World Economic Forum Reveals Plan To Block Out The Sun With 'Space Bubbles'
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Rudy Canoza
Sep 9, 2022, 8:15:03 PM9/9/22
to
In article <t03b2c$277oq$1...@news.freedyn.de>
<governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Democrats are un-Americans. They all need to be killed.
>
In June of 2019, the World Economic Forum — a private group of
elite billionaires — signed a strategic partnership with the
United Nations, an intergovernmental organization. This highly
questionable partnership was formed with the explicit goal of
“accelerating the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development.”
<https://humansbefree.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/World-
Economic-Forum-Reveals-Plan-to-Block-Out-the-Sun-With-
%E2%80%98Space-Bubbles-e1658863256498-1000x500.jpg>
This move was seen by many across the world as a “corporate
takeover” on the United Nations and was opposed by hundreds of
NGOs, non-profits, think tanks, and government officials. An
open letter in September of 2019, signed by these organization,
detailed the the problem with such a move:
“The provisions of the strategic partnership effectively provide
that corporate leaders will become ‘whisper advisors’ to the
heads of UN system departments, using their private access to
advocate market-based profit-making ‘solutions’ to global
problems while undermining real solutions embedded in public
interest and transparent democratic procedures.”
Since that fateful day in June of 2019, the WEF’s influence has
grown and their relevance and power within the government has
vastly increased.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the WEF put out their mission,
entitled The Great Reset, to use the pandemic to push what they
say is a need for “global stakeholders to cooperate in
simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19
crisis ” to “help inform all those determining the future state
of global relations, the direction of national economies, the
priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the
management of a global commons.”
The Great Reset was written off by fact-checkers as a conspiracy
theory despite the WEF advocating for it publicly and the head
of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, literally writing a book with that
title — advocating for these very initiatives.
After amassing massive government influence for years, the
group, which openly refers to themselves as “elites” has come to
the same conclusion that Billy Boy has come to years ago — we
need to block out the sun to slow climate change.
Differing from the Gates plan of spraying aerosol particles into
the atmosphere to block out the sun, the WEF has gotten behind
the MIT proposal to use “space bubbles” to form a solar shield.
“Space-based solutions would be safer – for instance, if we
deflect 1.8 per cent of incident solar radiation before it hits
our planet, we could fully reverse today’s global warming.”
Another advantage of this particular solar shield is that it is
reversible, as the bubbles could be deflated and removed from
their position.
The spheres would be made from a material such as silicon,
transported to space in molten form, or graphene-reinforced
ionic liquids.
For now, the plan is a working hypothesis and scientists behind
it are only conducting experiments in the lab. Citing the highly
controversial nature of such geoengineering plans, the WEF fell
back on their relationship with the UN to justify it.
Geoengineering has proven controversial, but the United Nations’
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has said it is a
necessary Plan B if temperature rises can’t be capped at a
manageable level.
Indeed, regardless of the assurances of the elite, many
scientists and government bodies are making moves to prevent
such actions. Some countries have even banned the practice.
Last year, the nation of Sweden recanted on their plan to test
Billy Boy’ plan to spray particles in the sky to test blocking
out the sun — citing disagreements among scientists.
Others simply want to compensate anyone who is harmed by these
projects.
David Keith, a professor of applied physics and public policy at
Harvard University, recognizes the “very many real concerns” of
geoengineering, according to a report in Forbes. To offset these
risks he has proposed the creation of a “risk pool” to collect
funds for the risks associated with playing mother nature — up
to and including cooling an area so much that inhabitants are
unable to grow food.
As Forbes reports:
Again, these temperature decreases bring with them serious
risks. Freezing temperatures in 1815 led to failed crops in near-
famine conditions. British scientists have cited stratospheric
aerosols from volcanic eruptions in Alaska and Mexico as the
potential cause of drought in Africa’s Sahel region. Major
disruption of the global climate could bring unintended
consequences, negatively impacting highly populated regions and
engineering another refugee crisis.
David Keith has proposed the creation of a “risk pool” to
compensate smaller nations for collateral damage caused by such
tests, but such a payout might be little comfort to those
displaced by unlivable conditions.
Indeed. No amount of money would compensate for a family losing
all of their land to freezing temperatures and being forced to
relocate to another country. But these are some of the risks
involved in weather modification — which is why a small group of
global elites who are not scientists — should not be making
these decisions for 8 billion people.
<https://humansbefree.com/2022/07/world-economic-forum-reveals-
plan-to-block-out-the-sun-with-space-bubbles.html>
<governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Democrats are un-Americans. They all need to be killed.
>
In June of 2019, the World Economic Forum — a private group of
elite billionaires — signed a strategic partnership with the
United Nations, an intergovernmental organization. This highly
questionable partnership was formed with the explicit goal of
“accelerating the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for
Sustainable Development.”
<https://humansbefree.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/World-
Economic-Forum-Reveals-Plan-to-Block-Out-the-Sun-With-
%E2%80%98Space-Bubbles-e1658863256498-1000x500.jpg>
This move was seen by many across the world as a “corporate
takeover” on the United Nations and was opposed by hundreds of
NGOs, non-profits, think tanks, and government officials. An
open letter in September of 2019, signed by these organization,
detailed the the problem with such a move:
“The provisions of the strategic partnership effectively provide
that corporate leaders will become ‘whisper advisors’ to the
heads of UN system departments, using their private access to
advocate market-based profit-making ‘solutions’ to global
problems while undermining real solutions embedded in public
interest and transparent democratic procedures.”
Since that fateful day in June of 2019, the WEF’s influence has
grown and their relevance and power within the government has
vastly increased.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the WEF put out their mission,
entitled The Great Reset, to use the pandemic to push what they
say is a need for “global stakeholders to cooperate in
simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19
crisis ” to “help inform all those determining the future state
of global relations, the direction of national economies, the
priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the
management of a global commons.”
The Great Reset was written off by fact-checkers as a conspiracy
theory despite the WEF advocating for it publicly and the head
of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, literally writing a book with that
title — advocating for these very initiatives.
After amassing massive government influence for years, the
group, which openly refers to themselves as “elites” has come to
the same conclusion that Billy Boy has come to years ago — we
need to block out the sun to slow climate change.
Differing from the Gates plan of spraying aerosol particles into
the atmosphere to block out the sun, the WEF has gotten behind
the MIT proposal to use “space bubbles” to form a solar shield.
“Space-based solutions would be safer – for instance, if we
deflect 1.8 per cent of incident solar radiation before it hits
our planet, we could fully reverse today’s global warming.”
Another advantage of this particular solar shield is that it is
reversible, as the bubbles could be deflated and removed from
their position.
The spheres would be made from a material such as silicon,
transported to space in molten form, or graphene-reinforced
ionic liquids.
For now, the plan is a working hypothesis and scientists behind
it are only conducting experiments in the lab. Citing the highly
controversial nature of such geoengineering plans, the WEF fell
back on their relationship with the UN to justify it.
Geoengineering has proven controversial, but the United Nations’
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has said it is a
necessary Plan B if temperature rises can’t be capped at a
manageable level.
Indeed, regardless of the assurances of the elite, many
scientists and government bodies are making moves to prevent
such actions. Some countries have even banned the practice.
Last year, the nation of Sweden recanted on their plan to test
Billy Boy’ plan to spray particles in the sky to test blocking
out the sun — citing disagreements among scientists.
Others simply want to compensate anyone who is harmed by these
projects.
David Keith, a professor of applied physics and public policy at
Harvard University, recognizes the “very many real concerns” of
geoengineering, according to a report in Forbes. To offset these
risks he has proposed the creation of a “risk pool” to collect
funds for the risks associated with playing mother nature — up
to and including cooling an area so much that inhabitants are
unable to grow food.
As Forbes reports:
Again, these temperature decreases bring with them serious
risks. Freezing temperatures in 1815 led to failed crops in near-
famine conditions. British scientists have cited stratospheric
aerosols from volcanic eruptions in Alaska and Mexico as the
potential cause of drought in Africa’s Sahel region. Major
disruption of the global climate could bring unintended
consequences, negatively impacting highly populated regions and
engineering another refugee crisis.
David Keith has proposed the creation of a “risk pool” to
compensate smaller nations for collateral damage caused by such
tests, but such a payout might be little comfort to those
displaced by unlivable conditions.
Indeed. No amount of money would compensate for a family losing
all of their land to freezing temperatures and being forced to
relocate to another country. But these are some of the risks
involved in weather modification — which is why a small group of
global elites who are not scientists — should not be making
these decisions for 8 billion people.
<https://humansbefree.com/2022/07/world-economic-forum-reveals-
plan-to-block-out-the-sun-with-space-bubbles.html>
0 new messages