Why do so many people hate Bush?
Chuck Buckley
damage to this great country in so short a period of time.
Bush has done more harm to the United States of America in 3 short
years than all the terrorists in the world could accomplish in their
collective lifetimes.
Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )
One thing that is rather fun to do is to ask people like you exactly
what it is that Bush or didn't do that caused all this supposed harm.
The answers are hilarious.
--
"Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata."
+-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
Ohia
"Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
<std...@backpacker.com> wrote in message
news:3FC005A3...@backpacker.com...
> >
> One thing that is rather fun to do is to ask people like you exactly
> what it is that Bush or didn't do that caused all this supposed harm.
> The answers are hilarious.
>
planned well before 911.
Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )
Like what?
RedPill
his is a black and white mind in a Technicolor world.
--redpill.
"Chuck Buckley" <mikey...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d59e4cf.03112...@posting.google.com...
Joe S.
entire radical reactionary movement to destroy all progress made in this
country since the Great Depression.
The goal of the radical reactionaries who control the Republican Party was
revealed in all its ugliness when New Gingrich published his "Contract With
America." Gingrich entitled his reactionary legislation "Freedom to XXXX
Act" -- the Freedom to Farm Act, the Freedom to Bank Act, etc., etc.
In fact, what Gingrich proposed was a total rollback of progressive
legislation started with the New Deal. The Republican Party has bitterly
fought against all reform legislation in every field -- labor, banking,
farming, health, financial transactions, you name it. The radical
reactionary Republican Party wants to return to the days of the
late-19th/early-20th century with robber barons, six-day-work-weeks, 10-14
hours workdays, no overtime, no workplace health and safety regulations, no
food safety inspections, no limits on the unbridled powers of banks, stock
manipulators, and monopolies.
When the American public saw this, the Republican majority in the House and
Senate began to drop dramatically.
It was at this point that the Republican Lie Machine swung into action.
Fueled by huge infusions of money from Richard Mellon Sciafe and "Rev" Sun
Young Moon, the rightwing liars convinced many voters that the words
"Democrat" and "Liberal" were the equivalent of leprosy. Meanwhile, the
same lie machine set up GWBush as a compassionate healer.
He is none of the kind. He is totally in the thrall of the radical
reactionaries who intend to "starve the beast."
The radical reactionaries who run the Republican Party see the federal
government as the enemy. Their goal is to destroy all legislative progress
since the New Deal. However, they know that they cannot pass legislation to
wipe out Medicare, to wipe out Social Security, to stop food safety
inspections, to stop investigations into stock fraud. They know the public
would revolt if they tried to do what Gingrich did. So, they are doing it
quietly by running up huge federal deficits and quietly choking off the
programs they do not like.
Regulatory agencies are being starved. Do you really believe anyone is
going to investigate and prosecute Enron, WorldCom, mutual fund
manipulation? Of course not -- because the SEC is being strangled by not
being given sufficient budget to hire the investigators and lawyers it
needs. Same for every other regulatory agency -- do you really believe your
food and medication is being inspected?
GWBush has caved in to big business interests in his move to destroy
overtime pay. Remember a few months ago when the Congress turned down Bush
attempts to wipe out overtime for several million workers? Well, Bush has
attached the defeated legislation to the omnibus spending bill that the
government needs to continue operating -- and he has threatened to veto the
bill if the overtime-killing rider is taken out.
Why do I hate him? It's not so much the man -- he's nothing but an affable
dunce -- it's the policies to which he is captive that will turn this
country back over to the robber barons of the 19th century, all the while
sacrificing our young men and women to never-ending war.
What's your next question?
--
----
Joe S.
--
----
"Chuck Buckley" <mikey...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d59e4cf.03112...@posting.google.com...
Foxtrot
Every imaginable unpleasantry in the last three years is
Bush's fault, right Upchuckley? 9/11, the anthrax attacks,
the dot com collapse, the bad fishing season and the
outbreak of athletes foot are all Bush's fault, right?
BW
"Joe S." <no_ad...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:bpp2g...@enews2.newsguy.com...
> George Bush is not the problem.
Agreed. The problem is today's Democrat Party.
Stuart Grey
Chuck Buckley wrote:
> Most patriots could never care for a president who has caused so much
> damage to this great country in so short a period of time.
What damage?
> Bush has done more harm to the United States of America in 3 short
> years than all the terrorists in the world could accomplish in their
> collective lifetimes.
You care to defend your absurd claims?
Stuart Grey
Ohia wrote:
Now that was incoherent. What actions, and actions
by whom are you talking about?
Stuart Grey
Joe S. wrote:
> George Bush is not the problem. The problem is that he is part of the
> entire radical reactionary movement to destroy all progress made in this
> country since the Great Depression.
Progress towards what? World Socialism? The end
of Freedom? The destruction of America?
Yes, the Soviet Union is no more, China is turning
capitalist, and Cuba is an incredibly impoverished
nation, as is the other world socialism holdout,
North Korea.
Socialism has indeed been set back since the depression.
Is that a bad thing? Certainly not. Bush, his father,
and Ronald Reagan can be proud of their part in
turning back the tide of tyranny, and defending the
United States against it's enemies, foreign AND
DOMESTIC.
> The goal of the radical reactionaries who control the Republican Party was
> revealed in all its ugliness when New Gingrich published his "Contract With
> America." Gingrich entitled his reactionary legislation "Freedom to XXXX
> Act" -- the Freedom to Farm Act, the Freedom to Bank Act, etc., etc.
And, you find freedom bad.
> In fact, what Gingrich proposed was a total rollback of progressive
> legislation started with the New Deal.
"Progressive" is PC speak for "Communist".
> The Republican Party has bitterly
> fought against all reform legislation in every field -- labor, banking,
> farming, health, financial transactions, you name it. The radical
> reactionary Republican Party wants to return to the days of the
> late-19th/early-20th century with robber barons, six-day-work-weeks, 10-14
> hours workdays, no overtime, no workplace health and safety regulations, no
> food safety inspections, no limits on the unbridled powers of banks, stock
> manipulators, and monopolies.
Well, IMHO, the elected Republican office holders
are a bit too much in bed with those that would like
to be robber barons. The rank and file Republican
capitalist want to see the robber barons hung from
the lamp post at the street corner. No, the common man
does NOT want to see his capitalist holdings stolen
by the likes of Ken Lay.
On the other hand, the alternative is to vote for
the capitalist hating socialist/communist in the
alternative party - a sure thing that they will be
robbed of what they own.
All in all, they get a better deal with the Republicans.
> When the American public saw this, the Republican majority in the House and
> Senate began to drop dramatically.
?!? They are now the majority in both houses.
When the American people saw this, they put more
Republicans in office.
> It was at this point that the Republican Lie Machine swung into action.
> Fueled by huge infusions of money from Richard Mellon Sciafe and "Rev" Sun
> Young Moon, the rightwing liars convinced many voters that the words
> "Democrat" and "Liberal" were the equivalent of leprosy. Meanwhile, the
> same lie machine set up GWBush as a compassionate healer.
Nope. The convinced the middle of the road voters
that the Democrats have no ideas other than socialism,
and have decided to be bitterly critical of everything
that the Republicans do, EVEN IF the Democrats were
doing and saying the EXACT SAME THING, and the
Democrats came up with the policy in the first place!
The people are seeing the Democrats as trying to destroy
the nation for their own political goals. They've seen
this in the Rockerfeller memo, and in the California
legislature incident.
> He is none of the kind. He is totally in the thrall of the radical
> reactionaries who intend to "starve the beast."
>
> The radical reactionaries who run the Republican Party see the federal
> government as the enemy. Their goal is to destroy all legislative progress
> since the New Deal.
Again, only if you define "progress" as the
advancement of the socialist/communist goal
and the enslavement of the American people.
ehollo
"Stuart Grey" <Stuar...@comcastdot.net> wrote in message
news:nGUvb.281631$Fm2.291070@attbi_s04...
In terms of financial success, this is a conservative fallacy. Reagan, for
example,
ran up the national debt to unprecedented levels, and so Bush II follows in
his
footsteps.
The four most successful presidents in terms of increasing employment,
lowering
inflating, and reducing deficits--
were all Democrats. Reagan signed the largest tax increase in history. He
still
holds the record.
And the four presidents are:
FDR
Truman
Johnson
Clinton
And, at last count, Bush II has a 29% approval rating worldwide.
You were saying?
Stuart Grey
ehollo wrote:
> "Stuart Grey" <Stuar...@comcastdot.net> wrote in message
> news:nGUvb.281631$Fm2.291070@attbi_s04...
>
>>
>>Chuck Buckley wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Most patriots could never care for a president who has caused so much
>>>damage to this great country in so short a period of time.
>>
>>What damage?
>>
>>
>>>Bush has done more harm to the United States of America in 3 short
>>>years than all the terrorists in the world could accomplish in their
>>>collective lifetimes.
>>
>>You care to defend your absurd claims?
>
>
> In terms of financial success, this is a conservative fallacy. Reagan, for
> example,
> ran up the national debt to unprecedented levels, and so Bush II follows in
> his
> footsteps.
Reagan and Bush had Democrats in control of the
congress. And yes, this spending on "Star Wars"
was one of the things that broke the Soviets.
Wars, even cold wars, cost money. You're side
lost, my side won, get over it.
Winning this war for capitalism and liberty did
a great deal of good for America and set you
socialist back a great deal. The "peace benefit"
from the reduced spending after the victory lead
to the longest economic expansion in U.S. history.
Stuart Grey
Dennis McGee wrote:
> In article <nGUvb.281631$Fm2.291070@attbi_s04>, Stuart Grey
> <Stuar...@comcastdot.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>Chuck Buckley wrote:
>>>
>>>Most patriots could never care for a president who has caused
>>>so much damage to this great country in so short a period of
>>>time.
>>
>>What damage?
>
>
> Try an unnecessary military quagmire,
It's not a quagmire, and it was quite necessary
as you would know if you've been reading even
the recent newspapers.
Even if one has not read the newspapers about the
recently leaked memo; one would note that:
1) One of the big beefs and recruiting points
that Al Qaeda had was that we have had troops
in Saudi Arabia, and Islamic holy area, since
Saddam's original aggression back under Bush I.
2) We couldn't pull out as long as Saddam was
in power, as Saddam still posed a significant
threat that the Saudi's alone could not defend
against, even in Saddam's reduced state.
3) We could leave Saudi Arabia, and remove
one of Al Qaeda's big propaganda points, if
Saddam was REMOVED.
4) We removed Saddam, and then our troop strength
in Saudi Arabia was considerably reduced as
the threat Saddam posed to the region was gone.
Even the untrained observer could see the sound
reasoning behind this motive to the Gulf War II.
When you throw in the fact that we have known
since the Clinton administration that Saddam
was working with Al Qaeda, and proof of this
recently surfaced, the case for war against
Iraq is a slam dunk.
However, some anti American socialist who
want to destroy America are still ranting on
as if they were not proven to be the fools
they are.
> record unemployment, deficits as far
> as the eye can see, and a loss of US prestige worldwide as starters.
We had the longest economic expansion in U.S.
history, mostly due to the reduction in government
borrowing due to Reagan winning the cold war.
It was bound to come to an end, and it did, towards
the end of the Clinton Administration. Bush didn't
cause it, Clinton didn't cause it. It's part of a
natural cycle. So, as far as "record unemployment"
and "deficits", it's just bull.
As to loss of US prestige, yes, socialist all
over the world are pissed that the US has
taken another step back from the brink of
world socialism.
nospam
determination for freedom for us and for all other civilized nations.
He has single handedly controlled terrorism and will continue to do so
until he is allowed to retire.
He is the most wonderful president we have ever had. He has brought
morality, prayer, family and patriotism back into the Whitehouse.
Stuart Grey
Dennis McGee wrote:
> In article <0EVvb.277671$HS4.2462734@attbi_s01>, Stuart Grey
> <Stuar...@comcastdot.net> wrote:
>
> (a bunch of rationalizations for the boyking's incompetence and corruptness)
You make a poor impression when you're challenged
to support these allegations of incompetence and
corruption, and all you can do is endlessly repeat
the same unfounded lies.
> Yeah whatever. You'd be squealing like a stuck pig right now if a Democrat
> incumbent had presided over an unnecessary military quagmire, record
> unemployment, deficits as far as the eye can see, and a loss of US prestige
> worldwide.
The only president to have done that in the last
100 years was LBJ.
> I guess time will tell if Bush's $200 million warchest can convince the
> American people they need to be punished like this for another four years.
KENNETH B. LANE
have raped this nation since it's very beginning. His family financed Adolf
Hitler and financed the attachs on the World Trade Center (thru uncle
Jonathon's place of employ - Rigg Bank--bank Saudie Princess funded the
hijackers thru-- www.riggbank.com .
Republicans are traitors to our nation--always have been and always will be.
They are blood suckers who hate honest work and must suck worth from others
to survive.
Time to educate these creeps on the merits of truth. Dirty, underhanded
tricks is the the way to wealth, at least it shouldn't be anymore!
"Chuck Buckley" <mikey...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d59e4cf.03112...@posting.google.com...
James
spend when the Soviet Union went under. They didn't seem too worried about
any deficit. LOL
Winston Smith, American Patriot
>
>
> Chuck Buckley wrote:
>>
>> Most patriots could never care for a president who has caused so much
>> damage to this great country in so short a period of time.
>>
>> Bush has done more harm to the United States of America in 3 short
>> years than all the terrorists in the world could accomplish in their
>> collective lifetimes.
>>
> One thing that is rather fun to do is to ask people like you exactly
> what it is that Bush or didn't do that caused all this supposed harm.
>
Muslims saw Bush invade Afghanistan and said that the Taliban/al Qaeda
deserved it. The whole world agreed.
Then Muslims saw Bush invade Iraq and said that Iraq did NOT deserve
it...had been cooperating...the proof is "where is the WMD?"....and
suspected, then knew it was about oil and Israel's desire to arrange the
Middle East to its liking. These Muslims now go to Iraq like iron filings
to a magnet, to sign up to kill Americans for the Crusade the U.S. starts
1000 years after the last one. For Bush's illegal invasion, not only those
who were indifferent to us now hate us (Muslims), but those who were our
friends and allies now are indifferent to us.
> The answers are hilarious.
Yuck it up, moron.
U N Me
> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> George W. Bush is so pro-Mexican that if you hit him with a stick, prizes would fall out of him.
> That traitor needs to be impeached.
> ////////////////////////
I wonder if there's a market for bush pinatas?
fiend999
<Stuar...@comcastdot.net> wrote:
> ehollo wrote:
>
> > "Stuart Grey" <Stuar...@comcastdot.net> wrote in message
> > news:nGUvb.281631$Fm2.291070@attbi_s04...
> >
> >>
> >>Chuck Buckley wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Most patriots could never care for a president who has caused so much
> >>>damage to this great country in so short a period of time.
> >>
> >>What damage?
> >>
> >>
> >>>Bush has done more harm to the United States of America in 3 short
> >>>years than all the terrorists in the world could accomplish in their
> >>>collective lifetimes.
> >>
> >>You care to defend your absurd claims?
> >
> >
> > In terms of financial success, this is a conservative fallacy. Reagan, for
> > example,
> > ran up the national debt to unprecedented levels, and so Bush II follows in
> > his
> > footsteps.
>
> Reagan and Bush had Democrats in control of the
> congress.
So what is W's excuse?
Vendicar Decarian
> Progress towards what? World Socialism? The end
> of Freedom? The destruction of America?
That just about sums it up....
ehollo
I think it's Bush's personality.
yoso...@hotmail.com
I would like to rephrase the questions. What has Bush done in the
last three years that has improve the lives of the American people.
These answers should be hilarious. Crap like making us stand tall,
showing the world who's the boss, and jingo crap won't do it. How have
our lives improved on average.
I personally can't think of anything of substance that this man has
done that will leave this world a better place due to GW Bush being
our president. That's a pretty sad thought when you consider he is
theoretically the most powerful man on the planet. Busness ethics,
education,the environment, the treatment of the poor and the
disenfranchised, our respect and position in the world, personal
freedom, the level of violence in the world. etc.. It just seems
endless. The man has improved nothing, but worse, he does not seem to
give a fat rats ass anyway..you could at least give credit if you felt
he tried.
Ted Hart
Eyeball Kid
lieu of the frontal attack <std...@backpacker.com> wrote:
> Chuck Buckley wrote:
> >
> > Most patriots could never care for a president who has caused so much
> > damage to this great country in so short a period of time.
> >
> > Bush has done more harm to the United States of America in 3 short
> > years than all the terrorists in the world could accomplish in their
> > collective lifetimes.
> >
> One thing that is rather fun to do is to ask people like you exactly
> what it is that Bush or didn't do that caused all this supposed harm.
> The answers are hilarious.
Yeah. The comic relief begins when the families of the 9/11 dead can't
get a straight answer from the White House about what information they
knew before the attacks. More laughs build to a crescendo when the
families of the dead from the Iraq invasion and occupation ask where
the justifications for the war went. And from way up in the peanut
gallery, the guffaws can be heard from the Pope, who opined that any
invasion of Iraq would constitute an "unjust war" (Hmm.. I guess that
means that the head of the Catholic Church is implying that unjustified
killing means that Bush has ordered the murdering of countless Iraqis.
But what does the Pope know, anyway, when it is Bush himself who said
that God had told him to invade Iraq?).
Well, my sides are aching from all of this hilarity. I've got to rest
now.
E. K.
--
Free humor. Whenever you want. http://www.psmueller.com
"It would be a mistake for the United States Senate to allow any kind of human
cloning to come out of that chamber."季.W. Bush, Wash. D.C., April 10, 2002
"Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he
makes and we should just support that."- Britany Spears, 9/2003
He Pep!
> Chuck Buckley wrote:
>
> > Most patriots could never care for a president who has caused so much
> > damage to this great country in so short a period of time.
>
> What damage?
A trillion dollars in new debt, millions of lost jobs, and an
involvement in a hugely expensive and unnecessary war that has cost of
the lives of hundreds of our military people does sping to mind.
>
> > Bush has done more harm to the United States of America in 3 short
> > years than all the terrorists in the world could accomplish in their
> > collective lifetimes.
> You care to defens your absurd claims?
If terrorists could cause a trillion dollars in new debt, deprive 2.5
million Americans of their jobs, and embroil us in a vanity war and
quagmire that would further deplete our economy and cost of the lives
of hundreds of our military, I should think they would consider such
destruction terrorist successes.
But they weren't caused by terrorists, the were caused by the
indifference and flat out stupidity our remarkably inmept and
incompetent president.
>
> You care to defend your absurd claims?
Care defend your absurd "president" beyond asking "why daddy?"
questions?
Grace
ROFLMAO!!!!!
Are you fucking brain-damaged or what? He's a miserable failure as a
pResident and as a human being. He has no morals. Look beyond the
marketing, dumbass.
"nospam" <bist...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:aNVvb.11549$n56....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Grace
past the party line to see how devasting this administration's policies have
been to the PEOPLE who they work for. See, that is what your ilk forgets,
they work for us not the other way around.
"BW" <b...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:mxUvb.82055$Dw6.392625@attbi_s02...
Stuart Grey
Winston Smith wrote:
> "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )"
> <std...@backpacker.com> wrote in inimitable style:
>
>
>>
>>Chuck Buckley wrote:
>>
>>>Most patriots could never care for a president who has caused so much
>>>damage to this great country in so short a period of time.
>>>
>>>Bush has done more harm to the United States of America in 3 short
>>>years than all the terrorists in the world could accomplish in their
>>>collective lifetimes.
>>>
>>
>>One thing that is rather fun to do is to ask people like you exactly
>>what it is that Bush or didn't do that caused all this supposed harm.
>>
>
>
> Muslims saw Bush invade Afghanistan and said that the Taliban/al Qaeda
> deserved it. The whole world agreed.
No. NATO wanted to make Afghanistan a NATO mission
so they could stop it, for example. That's why the
U.S. went after the 9-11 terrorist without the support
of NATO.
> Then Muslims saw Bush invade Iraq and said that Iraq did NOT deserve
> it...had been cooperating...the proof is "where is the WMD?"....and
> suspected, then knew it was about oil and Israel's desire to arrange the
> Middle East to its liking. These Muslims now go to Iraq like iron filings
> to a magnet, to sign up to kill Americans for the Crusade the U.S. starts
> 1000 years after the last one. For Bush's illegal invasion, not only those
> who were indifferent to us now hate us (Muslims), but those who were our
> friends and allies now are indifferent to us.
They all hated us anyway. The idea that we shouldn't
go stop the ones that are killing us because they
may kill us has been debunked. It's irrational on
the face of it.
It is far better to fight them in Iraq than to have
to fight them in New York.
You America haters are never going to change your
anti American spew. We pretty much take that as a given,
now.
Stuart Grey
fiend999 wrote:
> In article <7wVvb.280038$Tr4.863263@attbi_s03>, Stuart Grey
>>>In terms of financial success, this is a conservative fallacy. Reagan, for
>>>example,
>>>ran up the national debt to unprecedented levels, and so Bush II follows in
>>>his
>>>footsteps.
>>
>>Reagan and Bush had Democrats in control of the
>>congress.
>
>
> So what is W's excuse?
I know you're joking, which is what makes it so sad!
The Republicans are having problems keeping the budget
under control now because:
1) The longest economic expansion in American history
ended just before President Bush took office. The fall
in tax revenue made for a big budget shortfall.
2) To get the economy going again, the President and
Congress passed tax cuts, slightly raising the deficit.
This policy may have worked (or it might have been
the end of the natural cycle of economic downturn
after expansion...)
3) The terrorist acts of 9-11 have put a large
burden on the government to increase domestic
security, and this cost money. We also have had
to fight two foreign wars to root out the terrorist
and their allies, and this costs money too.
But all in all the big problem they faced was
(1), and the economy does seem to be turning around.
I don't even think it can be said to be certain
that it was the Republican's doing.
Vendicar Decarian
> 1) One of the big beefs and recruiting points
> that Al Qaeda had was that we have had troops
> in Saudi Arabia, and Islamic holy area, since
> Saddam's original aggression back under Bush I.
> 2) We couldn't pull out as long as Saddam was
> in power, as Saddam still posed a significant
> threat that the Saudi's alone could not defend
> against, even in Saddam's reduced state.
> 3) We could leave Saudi Arabia, and remove
> one of Al Qaeda's big propaganda points, if
> Saddam was REMOVED.
> 4) We removed Saddam, and then our troop strength
> in Saudi Arabia was considerably reduced as
> the threat Saddam posed to the region was gone.
Listen to the sniveling little peon-NeoCon traitor repeat the lie to protect
his discredited Liedeology....
No. 851-03
IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 15, 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
DoD Statement on News Reports of Al Qaeda and Iraq Connections
News reports that the Defense Department recently confirmed new information
with respect to contacts between al Qaeda and Iraq in a letter to the Senate
Intelligence Committee are inaccurate.
A letter was sent to the Senate Intelligence Committee on Oct. 27, 2003,
from Douglas J. Feith, under secretary of defense for policy, in response to
follow-up questions from his July 10 testimony. One of the questions posed
by the committee asked the department to provide the reports from the
intelligence community to which he referred in his testimony before the
committee. These reports dealt with the relationship between Iraq and al
Qaeda.
The letter to the committee included a classified annex containing a list
and description of the requested reports, so that the committee could obtain
the reports from the relevant members of the intelligence community.
The items listed in the classified annex were either raw reports or products
of the CIA, the National Security Agency or, in one case, the Defense
Intelligence Agency. The provision of the classified annex to the
Intelligence Committee was cleared by other agencies and done with the
permission of the intelligence community. The selection of the documents
was made by DoD to respond to the committee's question. The classified
annex was not an analysis of the substantive issue of the relationship
between Iraq and al Qaeda, and it drew no conclusions.
Individuals who leak or purport to leak classified information are doing
serious harm to national security; such activity is deplorable and may be
illegal.
Selma Ritter
> "Stupid Grey" <Stuar...@comcastdot.net> wrote in message
World Corporate Socialism? The end of Freedom? The destruction of America?
Yep. Sums up 3 years of Bush misrule to a tee.
Stuart Grey
ehollo wrote:
> "Stuart Grey" <Stuar...@comcastdot.net> wrote in message
>
> I think it's Bush's personality.
Could be. I, myself, hate to hear him give a speech.
He pauses in his lines like William Shatner. Shatner
did it because he was trying to remember his lines.
Still, I don't fault him for not being charismatic.
(I fault him for leaning too far to the left...)
Vendicar Decarian
"He Pep!" <he_pe...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a112fa89.03112...@posting.google.com...
> > What damage?
>
> A trillion dollars in new debt, millions of lost jobs, and an
> involvement in a hugely expensive and unnecessary war that has cost of
> the lives of hundreds of our military people does sping to mind.
You failed to mention the perpetual stream of lies from the Bush
administration, the hypocricy, distortion, illegality and outright acts of
terror used by the Bush administration to finish Daddy Bush's unfinished
personal business. And profiteer and loot america in the process.
The Enemies of America love Bush.
Vendicar Decarian
"nospam" <bist...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:aNVvb.11549$n56....@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> d