Since Muslims took down Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in
1988, every attack on a commercial airliner has been committed by
foreign-born Muslim men with the same hair color, eye color and skin
color. Half of them have been named Mohammed.
An alien from the planet "Not Politically Correct" would have surveyed
the situation after 9/11 and said: "You are at war with an enemy
without uniforms, without morals, without a country and without a
leader -- but the one advantage you have is they all look alike. ...
What? ... What did I say?"
The only advantage we have in a war with stateless terrorists was
ruled out of order ab initio by political correctness.
And so, despite 5 trillion Americans opening laptops, surrendering lip
gloss and drinking breast milk in airports day after day for the past
eight years, the government still couldn't stop a Nigerian Muslim from
nearly blowing up a plane over Detroit on Christmas Day.
The "warning signs" exhibited by this particular passenger included
the following:
His name was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
He's Nigerian.
He's a Muslim.
His name was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
He boarded a plane in Lagos, Nigeria.
He paid nearly $3,000 in cash for his ticket.
He had no luggage.
His name was Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
Two months ago, his father warned the U.S. that he was a radical
Muslim and possibly dangerous.
If our security procedures can't stop this guy, can't we just dispense
with those procedures altogether? What's the point exactly?
(To be fair, the father's warning might have been taken more seriously
if he had not simultaneously asked for the U.S. Embassy's Social
Security number and bank routing number in order to convey a $28
million inheritance that was trapped in a Nigerian bank account.)
The warning from Abdulmutallab's father put his son on some list, but
not the "no fly" list. Apparently, it's tougher to get on the "no fly"
list than it was to get into Studio 54 in the '70s. Currently, the
only people on the "no fly" list" are the Blind Sheik and Sean Penn.
The government is like the drunk looking for his keys under a
lamppost. Someone stops to help, and asks, "Is this where you lost
them?" No, the drunk answers, but the light's better here.
The government refuses to perform the only possibly effective security
check -- search Muslims -- so instead it harasses infinitely compliant
Americans.
And Redneck Fascists too!
If you can show consistent profiles related to acts of terror put em to it too!
But, outside Oklahoma city what ya got?
Virtually every terror act from 70's on has been committed by Muslim
males between
the ages of 17-40
You want to fly with em and be PC, guess you saying you respect Allah
on the flights
gonna save yer dipshit ass, I don't think so!
The bomber probably thinkin the Muslim equivalent of cracker before his
sendoff to Allah!
We already know what a trillion-dollar military can do
if not wisely deployed, piss away a trillion dollars really
fast.
WS
Naw...Lets start a war with Argentina, after all they didn't have anything
to do with the bombing attempt so they should be the natural target. Isn't
that the way it works?
Beheading video Ken Bigley:
http://www.nomullas.net/bigley-beheaded.wmv
Beheading video Hussein Shanun:
http://www.nomullas.net/iraqi-officer.wmv
Beheading video:
http://www.nomullas.com/iraqiworkerbeheaded.wmv
Beheading video IRAQI NATIONAL GUARD:
http://www.nomullas.com/iraqinationalguardbeheadedbyzarqawi.wmv
Beheading video ALA AL MALIKI:
http://www.nomullas.com/iraqialaalmalikiansaralsunnahbeheading.wmv
Beheading video CIA AGENT IN IRAQ:
http://www.nomullas.com/ciaagentbeheadediniraq.wmv
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/ciasplit7.wmv
Beheading video BULGARIAN:
http://www.nomullas.com/bulgarianbeheadingvideo.wmv
Beheading video 3 IN AFGHANISTAN:
http://www.nomullas.com/3beheadedfull.wmv
Beheading video TURKS:
http://www.nomullas.com/2turksbeheaded.wma
Beheading video IRAQI WORKER:
http://www.nomullas.com/2iraqiworkerbeheaded.wmv
Beheading video EGYPTIAN SPY IN IRAQ:
http://www.nomullas.com/beheadingofegyptianspyiniraq.wmv
Beheading video NEPALESE WORKERS:
http://www.aliennationreport.com/NEPVID.wmv
Beheading video KIM SUN IL:
http://www.aliennationreport.com/KIMSUN.wmv
Beheading video JACK HENSLEY:
http://www.aliennationreport.com/JACKHEN.wmv
Beheading video EUGENE ARMSTRONG:
http://www.aliennationreport.com/ARMVID.wmv
Beheading video PAUL JOHNSON:
http://www.aliennationreport.com/PUAL.wmv
Beheading video DANIEL PEARL:
http://www.aliennationreport.com/DAN.asx
Beheading video:
http://www.masada2000.org/Execution%20-Russian.asf
Beheading video:
http://www.aliennationreport.com/RUSS.wmv
Beheading video of American civil engineer Eugene Armstrong:
long:
http://www.warriorsfortruth.com/VIDEO-BEHEADING-Eugene-Armstrong.WMV
Beheading video of Japanese tourist Shosei Koda:
http://www.masada2000.org/shosei-koda-beheading-video.wmv
http://www.aliennationreport.com/SHOSEIKODA.wmv
Execution video:
http://www.nomullas.com/italianandturkexecution.wmv
Torture:
http://www.masada2000.org/impalement.asx
Torture:
http://www.nomullas.com/brutaltorturescenesiniraq.wmv
And your nitwit republican point is what? That Argentina will start
beheading people when we go to war with them? Your logic is impeccable. A
trillion dollars in wars because some ragheads chop off heads, stupid.
That's worked well! Why don't you pay attention to what's going on in
Mexico.
Gosh, Akmed, then I guess that everyone has gone to war with them:
Scottish air travelers, Russian school children they machine-gunned,
UK subway riders, Spanish subway riders, Malaysian night clubbers,
Australian night clubbers ....
Hindus, Buddhists ...
But you appeasement Nevile Chamberlain-type pussies just keep making
excuses for 'em.
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 06:52:32 -0800, "Bob Eld" <nsmon...@yahoo.com>
You can't drive a simple truth home to these idiots, they would rather
spend the money
buyin some entitlement babies vote and having a coupla thousand
Americans die than
actually addressing issues of National Security
You are ignoring major points to the story. Why is there terrorism in the
first place? Hint: We are fucking with their countries. Who has killed more
people in the last decade than any other ? The USA. Terrorists attacks are
small potatoes compared to what your heroes Bush and Cheney did to Iraq and
Afghanistan. Maybe someday the term "taking responsibility" will jell in the
two brain cells you have left.
Bush's fucking incompetence got thousands of innocent Americans
killed, NOT Obama's. Stop blaming Liberals, loser.
WS
>
>"Nobama" <Radical@whitehouse.> wrote in message
>news:4b3e1208...@news.datemas.de...
>>
>>
>>
>> Gosh, Akmed, then I guess that everyone has gone to war with them:
>>
>> Scottish air travelers, Russian school children they machine-gunned,
>> UK subway riders, Spanish subway riders, Malaysian night clubbers,
>> Australian night clubbers ....
>>
>> Hindus, Buddhists ...
>>
>> But you appeasement Nevile Chamberlain-type pussies just keep making
>> excuses for 'em.
>
>You are ignoring major points to the story. Why is there terrorism in the
>first place? Hint: We are fucking with their countries
Who's we, guinea? The rags are targetting everyone, not just
Americans and Jews.
> Who has killed more
>people in the last decade than any other ? The USA.
Who has murdered more people than anyone?
Islamic terrorists.
>Terrorists attacks are
>small potatoes compared to what your heroes Bush and Cheney did to Iraq and
>Afghanistan. Maybe someday the term "taking responsibility" will jell in the
>two brain cells you have left.
War's tough, ain't it. That's how come it's called war.
You should been around during WWII and seen how much collateral damage
was done. Ever hear of Hiroshima? Nagasaki? The leveling of German
cities? The Krauts hid behind Belgians thinking that we wouldn't bomb
them there. They figured wrong. War, baby, war.
If we had more like you around then, we'd all be speaking Kraut and
Jap right now.
Why, you deserve our disdain more than anyone, you would rather spend money
buyin votes, you idiots have marginilized the threat and you fuckwits
try to have
it bothways.
Remember that I support the troops but not the war BS, the military
knows your a bunch
of waffling cocksuckers as do most of the public so piss off!
Snip the silly rant!
> You should been around during WWII and seen how much collateral damage
> was done. Ever hear of Hiroshima? Nagasaki? The leveling of German
> cities? The Krauts hid behind Belgians thinking that we wouldn't bomb
> them there. They figured wrong. War, baby, war.
>
> If we had more like you around then, we'd all be speaking Kraut and
> Jap right now.
There are Zero parallels to mighty industrial nations of Germany and Japan
and anybody, any country or any thing in the Islamic world. The Islamists
and their society are literally third world pre-industrial Camel Jockeys who
don't even make their own weapons. They Have NO navies, No ships, No
aircraft carriers, NO cruisers, NO submarines, nothing. I doubt they even
have row boats. They have NO armies, NO tanks, NO howitzers, No amassed
troupes, NO personnel carriers, nothing. They have NO air force, NO planes,
NO rockets. NO ballistic missiles. NO large bombs and no way to deliver
them, nothing. And you compare them to the Nazis and Japs. How fucking
absurd. WWII was a real war against real armed industrial might and real
tough enemies. The Islamic Jihadists are total pussies by comparison and
unworthy. They attack with IED's, suicide bombs and concentrate on soft
civilian targets. A fight with them is no contests but they can eat up our
resources and cost us dearly with little effort on their part. A $100 IED
can destroy a million bucks of our stuff and kill many. This illustrates the
absurdity of conventional war against them. It's time to think smart.
> > If we had more like you around then, we'd all be speaking Kraut and
> > Jap right now.
I keep hearing that bullshit rant from morons like you. Name one country
that was conquered or made a territory to another that completely changed
its culture. It doesn't happen, you uneducated idiot. Did Japan and Germany
lose their cultures after WW2? NO. You are really stupid. Why don't you STFU
and go away?
Incompetent Bush ignored national security memos and got
thousands of Americans killed on 9/11/2001. Rant about all
that other shit if you want, the fact remains.
WS
>> "Nobama" <jack@yomomma.> wrote in message
US ain't trying to change raghead culture or even conquer them . We
just wanna drive their terrorist tendencies outta them.
Spreading cheek won't do it, Neville.
SENSE OF UMMAH
The Trouble With Islam
Sadly, mainstream Muslim teaching accepts and promotes violence.
BY TAWFIK HAMID
Not many years ago the brilliant Orientalist, Bernard Lewis, published
a short history of the Islamic world's decline, entitled "What Went
Wrong?" Astonishingly, there was, among many Western "progressives," a
vocal dislike for the title. It is a false premise, these critics
protested. They ignored Mr. Lewis's implicit statement that things
have been, or could be, right.
But indeed, there is much that is clearly wrong with the Islamic
world. Women are stoned to death and undergo clitorectomies. Gays hang
from the gallows under the approving eyes of the proponents of
Shariah, the legal code of Islam. Sunni and Shia massacre each other
daily in Iraq. Palestinian mothers teach 3-year-old boys and girls the
ideal of martyrdom. One would expect the orthodox Islamic
establishment to evade or dismiss these complaints, but less happily,
the non-Muslim priests of enlightenment in the West have come,
actively and passively, to the Islamists' defense.
These "progressives" frequently cite the need to examine "root
causes." In this they are correct: Terrorism is only the manifestation
of a disease and not the disease itself. But the root-causes are quite
different from what they think. As a former member of Jemaah Islamiya,
a group led by al Qaeda's second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, I know
firsthand that the inhumane teaching in Islamist ideology can
transform a young, benevolent mind into that of a terrorist. Without
confronting the ideological roots of radical Islam it will be
impossible to combat it. While there are many ideological "rootlets"
of Islamism, the main tap root has a name--Salafism, or Salafi Islam,
a violent, ultra-conservative version of the religion.
It is vital to grasp that traditional and even mainstream Islamic
teaching accepts and promotes violence. Shariah, for example, allows
apostates to be killed, permits beating women to discipline them,
seeks to subjugate non-Muslims to Islam as dhimmis and justifies
declaring war to do so. It exhorts good Muslims to exterminate the
Jews before the "end of days." The near deafening silence of the
Muslim majority against these barbaric practices is evidence enough
that there is something fundamentally wrong.
The grave predicament we face in the Islamic world is the virtual lack
of approved, theologically rigorous interpretations of Islam that
clearly challenge the abusive aspects of Shariah. Unlike Salafism,
more liberal branches of Islam, such as Sufism, typically do not
provide the essential theological base to nullify the cruel
proclamations of their Salafist counterparts. And so, for more than 20
years I have been developing and working to establish a
theologically-rigorous Islam that teaches peace.
Yet it is ironic and discouraging that many non-Muslim, Western
intellectuals--who unceasingly claim to support human rights--have
become obstacles to reforming Islam. Political correctness among
Westerners obstructs unambiguous criticism of Shariah's inhumanity.
They find socioeconomic or political excuses for Islamist terrorism
such as poverty, colonialism, discrimination or the existence of
Israel. What incentive is there for Muslims to demand reform when
Western "progressives" pave the way for Islamist barbarity? Indeed, if
the problem is not one of religious beliefs, it leaves one to wonder
why Christians who live among Muslims under identical circumstances
refrain from contributing to wide-scale, systematic campaigns of
terror.
Politicians and scholars in the West have taken up the chant that
Islamic extremism is caused by the Arab-Israeli conflict. This
analysis cannot convince any rational person that the Islamist murder
of over 150,000 innocent people in Algeria--which happened in the last
few decades--or their slaying of hundreds of Buddhists in Thailand, or
the brutal violence between Sunni and Shia in Iraq could have anything
to do with the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Western feminists duly fight in their home countries for equal pay and
opportunity, but seemingly ignore, under a fa�ade of cultural
relativism, that large numbers of women in the Islamic world live
under threat of beating, execution and genital mutilation, or cannot
vote, drive cars and dress as they please.
The tendency of many Westerners to restrict themselves to
self-criticism further obstructs reformation in Islam. Americans
demonstrate against the war in Iraq, yet decline to demonstrate
against the terrorists who kidnap innocent people and behead them.
Similarly, after the Madrid train bombings, millions of Spanish
citizens demonstrated against their separatist organization, ETA. But
once the demonstrators realized that Muslims were behind the terror
attacks they suspended the demonstrations. This example sent a message
to radical Islamists to continue their violent methods.
Western appeasement of their Muslim communities has exacerbated the
problem. During the four-month period after the publication of the
Muhammad cartoons in a Danish magazine, there were comparatively few
violent demonstrations by Muslims. Within a few days of the Danish
magazine's formal apology, riots erupted throughout the world. The
apology had been perceived by Islamists as weakness and concession.
Worst of all, perhaps, is the anti-Americanism among many Westerners.
It is a resentment so strong, so deep-seated, so rooted in personal
identity, that it has led many, consciously or unconsciously, to
morally support America's enemies.
Progressives need to realize that radical Islam is based on an
antiliberal system. They need to awaken to the inhumane policies and
practices of Islamists around the world. They need to realize that
Islamism spells the death of liberal values. And they must not take
for granted the respect for human rights and dignity that we
experience in America, and indeed, the West, today.
Well-meaning interfaith dialogues with Muslims have largely been
fruitless. Participants must demand--but so far haven't--that Muslim
organizations and scholars specifically and unambiguously denounce
violent Salafi components in their mosques and in the media. Muslims
who do not vocally oppose brutal Shariah decrees should not be
considered "moderates."
All of this makes the efforts of Muslim reformers more difficult. When
Westerners make politically-correct excuses for Islamism, it actually
endangers the lives of reformers and in many cases has the effect of
suppressing their voices.
Tolerance does not mean toleration of atrocities under the umbrella of
relativism. It is time for all of us in the free world to face the
reality of Salafi Islam or the reality of radical Islam will continue
to face us.
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 16:16:57 -0800, "Bob Eld" <nsmon...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
I agree, the problem is Islam, a 13th century, absolutist, fundamentalist,
righteous religion that has totally failed to come into or address the
modern age. It's brutal and repressive no question about it. But, there are
two billion of them. You simply cannot kill them all. There is just no way.
So, if you are to be successful in combating them you have to find an
alternative to waging war. As I pointed out above they use $100 bombs to
cause a million bucks in destruction so who is the smartest? They kill
dozens with one suicide bomber so who's taking greater casualties? These
wars are unsymmetrical and seem to NEVER get resolved. They can and are
causing us to spend our way to oblivion, a trillion so far with no end it
sight. It's way past time to think smart and stop acting like ants. Ants
swarm out and sting anything is sight when their ant hill is kicked but the
kid who kicked it is usually long gone and isn't the one getting stung.
We're trying to swat flies with a baseball bat. We smash up a lot of things
but kill few flies. The military is an expensive but very blunt instrument.
It's designed to go after infrastructure like aircraft plants, dams and
factories but is largely a costly failure going after jihadists. We have
been at it nine years and have gotten virtually no where. A trillion to kill
Saddam and his sons, such a deal! What else have we gotten for our trillion?
And, how are we going to go into 60 countries where they are to root them
out? Think it through man, what is the end game?
I think limp wristed Noam Chomsky reading members of Greenpeace and
the ACLU should be interrogated also.
Hopefully a bullet in the back of the head will keep these terrorists
off of OUR planes!
> You are ignoring major points to the story. Why is there terrorism in the
> first place? Hint: We are fucking with their countries.
OK dick sucker I'll bite.
What did Bush do to Afghanistan before 9/11???
As usual you will have to go to your sissy Lib talking points but I
would like to hear them for a good laugh.
>
> Incompetent Bush ignored national security memos and got
> thousands of Americans killed on 9/11/2001. Rant about all
> that other shit if you want, the fact remains.
> WS
Obama was given the fucking NAME of the Detroit plane bomber and he
did NOTHING!!!
Except the hula in Hawaii!!!
Obama WANTS terrorist attacks!!!!
No, he wasn't. You are lying.
Tater
We've gotten nowhere becasue of wimp-ass leaders like Bush who allow
themselves to be pressured by you appeasement apostles
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 19:36:06 -0800, "Bob Eld" <nsmon...@yahoo.com>
>
> Incompetent Bush ignored national security memos and got
> thousands of Americans killed on 9/11/2001. Rant about all
> that other shit if you want, the fact remains.
> WS
>Obama was given the fucking NAME of the Detroit plane bomber and he<
>did NOTHING!!!<
That is just not true, stinking un-American liar.
WS
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:20:21 -0600, "Bruno Muscarelli" <Br...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Nobama" <Radical@whitehouse.> wrote in message
>> news:4b3e1208...@news.datemas.de...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gosh, Akmed, then I guess that everyone has gone to war with them:
>>>
>>> Scottish air travelers, Russian school children they machine-gunned,
>>> UK subway riders, Spanish subway riders, Malaysian night clubbers,
>>> Australian night clubbers ....
>>>
>>> Hindus, Buddhists ...
>>>
>>> But you appeasement Nevile Chamberlain-type pussies just keep making
>>> excuses for 'em.
>>
>> You are ignoring major points to the story. Why is there terrorism in the
>> first place? Hint: We are fucking with their countries
Asshole, Islam's own teachings demand convert or die, you think the koran's
some warm little document your'e an idiot! They use it to justify killing you
and your children and anything else gets in the way of Muslim dominance
fuckwit!
>
> Who's we, guinea? The rags are targetting everyone, not just
> Americans and Jews.
>
>> Who has killed more
>> people in the last decade than any other ? The USA.
Saadam Hussein 2 mil+
Kim Jong Il 2 mil +
Mao Tse Tung 60 mil+
Idi Amin 1/2 mil +
Ayotolla Kohmeini/Iran leadership 2 mil+
Kim Jong Il 1 mil +
Stalin/Lenin 30 Mil + Rest unknown, could be double
Hugo Chavez couple hundred thousand
Castro - hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, BO's hero Che Gueverra beat in
infants heads with a baseball bat, hundreds of them by his own hand
Now what exactly USA did beats that, are we staying, did we not spend
our money to
help establish new govt. Another fuckwit excuse from left
>
> Who has murdered more people than anyone?
>
> Islamic terrorists.
>
>> Terrorists attacks are
>> small potatoes compared to what your heroes Bush and Cheney did to Iraq and
>> Afghanistan. Maybe someday the term "taking responsibility" will jell in the
>> two brain cells you have left.
You think your'e safe, don't give a shit about our security as your'e
just a leftwing schill
trying to buy a vote!
>
> War's tough, ain't it. That's how come it's called war.
>
> You should been around during WWII and seen how much collateral damage
> was done. Ever hear of Hiroshima? Nagasaki? The leveling of German
> cities? The Krauts hid behind Belgians thinking that we wouldn't bomb
> them there. They figured wrong. War, baby, war.
>
> If we had more like you around then, we'd all be speaking Kraut and
> Jap right now.
In WW2 France you would have seen his ilk, generally hanging from lamp
posts hung for
collaborating with the Nazis, Just like the dems finacier Soros (Yes a
Nazi collaborator)
>Saadam Hussein 2 mil+
>Kim Jong Il 2 mil +
>Mao Tse Tung 60 mil+
>Idi Amin 1/2 mil +
>Ayotolla Kohmeini/Iran leadership 2 mil+
>Kim Jong Il 1 mil +
>Stalin/Lenin 30 Mil + Rest unknown, could be double
>Hugo Chavez couple hundred thousand
>Castro - hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, BO's hero Che Gueverra beat in
>infants heads with a baseball bat, hundreds of them by his own hand
Not to mention the Marxist Pol Pot who wiped out 3/3 of his country.
United States when it invaded and took over Hawaii.
Europe when it invaded North American "Indians."
Europe when it invaded and took over Australia.
Maybe you rightards should spend more time in history class and less
time in front of your Christianic deity constructs sucking Jesus penis.
---
Does belief in astrology cause insanity? http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm
Shit happens to everybody, white nigger, shit happens.
And now the Beaners and diaper heads are taking over AMerica.
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:52:26 GMT, fr...@skeptictank.org (DamOTclese)
wrote: