I guess this means we need to vote for Kerry so he can open up a line of
communication and appease these terrible monsters. Besides, they want Kerry
elected, why not?
--
Your home for Stevie Nicks and Fleetwood Mac streaming audio:
http://www.live365.com/stations/bgamelson?play
Fuck you.
If it weren't for georgiegirl, none of this would be happening.
And why would they want someone who would be respected and admired
throughout the world to be elected; they are having a field day with bush.
Q: How many people have died or been maimed on this planet today by Americans
and their 'foreign policies'?
Including landmines and unexploded ordinance left over from present and past
conflicts, torture (coercion), sanctions (they only affect the poor, not the
rich) and the US giving it's own farmers unlawful subsidies while others go
out of business, starve and die.
A: Too many to bother counting.
Look in the mirror to see the real monsters.
You are lost in your own reality.
The truth is, the US has freed more lives and saved more lives than any
other country in the last century.
>>>BAGHDAD, Iraq - An Iraqi militant group claimed on a Web site Saturday
>that
>>>it had beheaded a captive U.S. Marine, in what would be the fourth
>>>decapitation of a foreign hostage in the region since May
>
>I guess this means we need to vote for Kerry so he can open up a line of
>communication and appease these terrible monsters. Besides, they want Kerry
>elected, why not?
No one has helped the recruitment of terrorists like the drunken AWOL
bush; they LOVE him like none other.
Terrorism has flourished under the lying puke bush. How proud you
goosestepping republicans must be.
That's funny. In Zarqawi's letter to Al Qaeda he despaired at the US
troops making his terrorist activities impossible.
Terrorism will be destroyed in about 30 years, thanks to Bush, but no
thanks to posters like you.
Another sucker who believes Hollywood's version of history.
> "Bill Gamelson" <bill.g...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:4zEFc.6275$2I6...@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com...
>
>>>>BAGHDAD, Iraq - An Iraqi militant group claimed on a Web site Saturday
>>
>>that
>>
>>>>it had beheaded a captive U.S. Marine, in what would be the fourth
>>>>decapitation of a foreign hostage in the region since May
>>
>>I guess this means we need to vote for Kerry so he can open up a line of
>>communication and appease these terrible monsters. Besides, they want Kerry
>>elected, why not?
>>
>
> Monsters, LOL.
>
> Q: How many people have died or been maimed on this planet today by Americans
> and their 'foreign policies'?
Are you a German?
The headers of your posts show that you're posting from Germany.
If so, then would you care to discuss the track record of your country?
--
Steven L.
"Reagan bolstered the U.S. military might to ruin the Soviet economy,
and he achieved his goal."
-- Gennady Gerasimov (top spokesman for the Soviet Foreign
Ministry during the 1980s)
James Monroe wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 20:21:20 GMT, "Bill Gamelson"
> <bill.g...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>>BAGHDAD, Iraq - An Iraqi militant group claimed on a Web site Saturday
>>
>>that
>>
>>>>it had beheaded a captive U.S. Marine, in what would be the fourth
>>>>decapitation of a foreign hostage in the region since May
>>
>>I guess this means we need to vote for Kerry so he can open up a line of
>>communication and appease these terrible monsters. Besides, they want Kerry
>>elected, why not?
>
>
> No one has helped the recruitment of terrorists like the drunken AWOL
> bush; they LOVE him like none other.
Should Bush lose the election to Kerry in November, I'll bet that
immediately afterward, every Muslim terrorist group in the world will
issue a statement claiming that to be a great victory for THEM.
If Kerry wins, then in the week after the election, President-elect
Kerry is going to face a zillion questions from the news media as to why
the terrorists say that *they* are the big winners. (Which is just what
they said when the Socialists won in Spain.)
Assuming you and I are still on this NG in November, I'm going to remind
you of my prediction.
in fact, I think I'll post this as a separate discussion thread too.
Nope, that's where the Usenet server that I use is,
http://news.individual.net/. Look at my IP address to get better accuracy.
> If so, then would you care to discuss the track record of your country?
>
Ahhh, the old two wrongs make a right argument eh?
Actually, they would prefer someone with a cowboy mentality, who tries
to form "coalitions of the willing", rather than someone who will
attempt to form a united front with actual nations against terrorists.
The former (Bush administration) does a fine job of ticking off
extremists, and driving more and more into their camps. Hey, let's
drop a few more bombs on civilian targets.
Anyhow, enough on the standard reply I can give. What is interesting
is how people are still in cold war thinking here. Oh yes, a big
shiny military can force its will down whomever it wants to get what
it wants. Too bad such is not effective at stopping car bombs from
going off, or individuals who will blow themselves up to obtain
paradise.
- Richard Hutnik
Yes, and that means that the issues raised don't happen? The United
States had, during the cold war, caused democractically elected
leaders to get deposed because they might go in bed with the Russians.
If you ever were wondering where the "Great Satan" for the USA in
Iran came from, you might want to study the history of Iran.
So, do you now care to say, "well, you need to do some evil to make
good happen" then ok, fine, do that. But remember, to fight Nazi
Germany, the United States supported Stalin. To fight Communist
Russia (post Stalin), the United States backed bin Laden funding of
freedom fighters in Afganistan, and installed the Shah in Iran by a
CIA back coup. To fight Muslim extremists in Iran (which rose due to
a U.S planted Shah of Iran there), the USA backed Saddam. Noticing a
trend here? U.S foreign policy of backing the lesser evil had come
back time and time again to bite it in the behind. Oh yes, and we had
to invade Iraq to get out Saddam, who the USA back in the 1980s
against Iran.
- Richard Hutnik
I see, so they will start bombing military targets only, and be
branded "insurgents" and "revolutionaries", right?
Do you seriously think a boot of governmental militarism will stomp
out every kook and extremist who wants to blow something up? I wonder
what would of happened in 1776 if such technology existed. Hey, the
USA lives under the King!
And no, in 30 years the stamping out of terrorism won't be by Bush.
Bush won't be in power. Well, maybe GW Bush the 3rd might, so I take
that back. Yes, we will rename the presidency of the USA "Bush", just
like Rome had Caesar.
- Richard Hutnik
>
>
>James Monroe wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 20:21:20 GMT, "Bill Gamelson"
>> <bill.g...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>BAGHDAD, Iraq - An Iraqi militant group claimed on a Web site Saturday
>>>
>>>that
>>>
>>>>>it had beheaded a captive U.S. Marine, in what would be the fourth
>>>>>decapitation of a foreign hostage in the region since May
>>>
>>>I guess this means we need to vote for Kerry so he can open up a line of
>>>communication and appease these terrible monsters. Besides, they want Kerry
>>>elected, why not?
>>
>>
>> No one has helped the recruitment of terrorists like the drunken AWOL
>> bush; they LOVE him like none other.
>
>Should Bush lose the election to Kerry in November, I'll bet that
>immediately afterward, every Muslim terrorist group in the world will
>issue a statement claiming that to be a great victory for THEM.
Many of us look elsewhere for accurate news, but you keep right on
listening to the drunken bush, Limpballs and terrorist.
>On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 14:41:23 -0700, James Monroe
><spam...@spamless.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>No one has helped the recruitment of terrorists like the drunken
>
>You have proof that Bush is drunk?
>
>>AWOL
>
>Your proof GWB was ever AWOL is...?
>
>>bush; they LOVE him like none other.
>
>If you can't back up your insults, why should we listen to your
>opinion?
Asking for proof for news stories that are three and four years old
won't make them go away, goosestepper.
Too early for you to be desperately trying to re-write this particular
history. Give it a few more years and then re-cycle your lies.