Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

New BNP Scotland Logo Unveiled !

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Chris X

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 11:56:59 AM11/25/05
to
http://www.bnp.org.uk/reg_showarticle.php?contentID=435

The British National Party in Scotland has had its own unique emblem since
2001. The design was produced during a workshop meeting in Glasgow with
Party members from all over Scotland with the purposes of emphasising that
the BNP was not just an English party.

Three teams were formed for the workshop and rotated around three different
areas for development, which were culture, publicity and emblem design.

Amazingly all three groups produced virtually the same design during their
alloted times.

The first thistle design above was the result of combining the three drafts
and has been used on virtually all Scottish BNP leaflets since and was
registered with the Electoral Commission for use in our election campaigns.

This month however, a new updated emblem has been registered with the
Electoral Commission following a consultation of Scottish Organisers and
Fundholders which unanimously selected the new design.

Growing confidence

The new bolder emblem reflects the growing confidence of BNP Scotland and
our intention to stamp our mark on the electoral landscape in Scotland. The
next Holyrood elections are due in May 2007 and prospective candidates have
already come forward for some regional lists. Initial indications point to
the strong possibility of a breakthrough in Glasgow if local activists put
in the effort.

The BNP in Scotland is fiercely proud of our Scottish identity, culture and
heritage as can be seen in our manifesto for the previous Holyrood election
and this brave new logo reinforces our commitment to preserving tradition at
a time when other so called Scottish nationalists are falling over
themselves to dilute that through the promotion of mass immigration.

*************************

"If I'd have wanted to die for Israel, I'd have joined the South Lebanon
Army."
- British Army Private, Iraq, July 2003

http://www.bnp.org.uk
http://www.bnp.org.uk/policies/policies.htm
http://www.nowarforisrael.com
http://www.no2id.org

Stephen Glynn

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 12:19:05 PM11/25/05
to
Chris X wrote:
> http://www.bnp.org.uk/reg_showarticle.php?contentID=435
>
> The British National Party in Scotland has had its own unique emblem since
> 2001. The design was produced during a workshop meeting in Glasgow with
> Party members from all over Scotland with the purposes of emphasising that
> the BNP was not just an English party.
>

Am I alone in thinking the emblem is a bit reminiscent of a well-known
children's TV character from my childhood? Take a look at Chris's link
and then at

http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/children/watchwm/fpm_and_weed.jpg

and see what you reckon.

Steve

Chris X

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 12:24:27 PM11/25/05
to

"Stephen Glynn" <stephe...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:dIHhf.3997$GC1....@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net...

Erm.... you do realise you're referring to the old logo, don't you ?


Stephen Glynn

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 12:38:45 PM11/25/05
to

She looks a bit butcher and a lot happier in the new logo, certainly.

Steve

Chris X

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 12:42:56 PM11/25/05
to
"Stephen Glynn" <stephe...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:F_Hhf.4410$w73....@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...

Indeed - sturdier, more positive and here to stay, just like the British
National Party in Scotland !


Stephen Glynn

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 1:06:36 PM11/25/05
to
She's just feeling better about herself because she's come out!

Steve

Chris X

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 1:11:03 PM11/25/05
to
"Stephen Glynn" <stephe...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:MoIhf.4024$GC1....@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net...

True. Once nationalist ideas and sentiments are sparked within a people,
they become wholly unstoppable.


Christopher

unread,
Nov 25, 2005, 1:10:19 PM11/25/05
to
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:42:56 -0000, "Chris X"
<Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote:

>"Stephen Glynn" <stephe...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>news:F_Hhf.4410$w73....@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
>> Chris X wrote:
>>> "Stephen Glynn" <stephe...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
>>> news:dIHhf.3997$GC1....@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net...
>>>
>>>>Chris X wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>http://www.bnp.org.uk/reg_showarticle.php?contentID=435
>>>>>
>>>>>The British National Party in Scotland has had its own unique emblem
>>>>>since 2001. The design was produced during a workshop meeting in Glasgow
>>>>>with Party members from all over Scotland with the purposes of
>>>>>emphasising that the BNP was not just an English party.
>>>>>
>>>>Am I alone in thinking the emblem is a bit reminiscent of a well-known
>>>>children's TV character from my childhood? Take a look at Chris's link
>>>>and then at
>>>>
>>>>http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/children/watchwm/fpm_and_weed.jpg
>>>>
>>>>and see what you reckon.
>>>
>>> Erm.... you do realise you're referring to the old logo, don't you ?
>> She looks a bit butcher and a lot happier in the new logo, certainly.
>
>Indeed - sturdier, more positive and here to stay, just like the British
>National Party in Scotland !

Hmmmm, the SNP as the government in Scotland, and the BNP as the
government in Britain. Sure would make for an interesting
combination, plus it'd upset Rupert Murdoch. :-)


--

Christopher

Message has been deleted

Chris X

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 3:48:00 AM11/26/05
to

"Guig" <yerawsittin@hame> wrote in message
news:nrveo1hr0c1ksfunh...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:42:56 -0000, "Chris X"
> <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Indeed - sturdier, more positive and here to stay, just like the British
>>National Party in Scotland !
>
> There is no BNP "in Scotland",

Yes there is !

> you can't even get more votes than a
> lunatic fringe party like Operation Christian Vote.

Times are changing, glug !

> You're an English party and neither you nor your "party" care one iota
> about issues in Scotland except when you can make cheap publicity

(Snip UAF rant)

"Do ye heff any speer chinch mista ?"


Paul Hyett

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 2:57:37 AM11/26/05
to
In uk.politics.misc on Fri, 25 Nov 2005 at 17:42:56, Chris X wrote :
>
>Indeed - sturdier, more positive and here to stay, just like the British
>National Party in Scotland !
>
You're even more irrelevant in Scotland that in England - they already
*have* a nationalist party, one that's far more popular than you!
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

Chris X

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 5:02:29 AM11/26/05
to
"Paul Hyett" <p...@nojunkmailplease.co.uk> wrote in message
news:kLLHg3Dx...@activist.demon.co.uk...

> In uk.politics.misc on Fri, 25 Nov 2005 at 17:42:56, Chris X wrote :
>>
>>Indeed - sturdier, more positive and here to stay, just like the British
>>National Party in Scotland !
>>
> You're even more irrelevant in Scotland that in England - they already
> *have* a nationalist party,

Yaaaawn .... *not* a British nationalist party.


tw

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 6:35:40 AM11/26/05
to

"Chris X" <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote in message
news:f_OdnQOW3OO...@giganews.com...


It appears nobody wants a British Nationlist Part, even in Britain. Or a
very small crowd of nobodies, if you prefer..

>
>
>
>
>
>


Chris X

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 6:46:05 AM11/26/05
to

"tw" <n...@no.com> wrote in message
news:dm9hac$r14$1...@news.al.sw.ericsson.se...

With almost a million votes for the British National Party in the 2004 Euro
election, it appears many people *do* want such a thing, (tw)at.


Alan Ferris

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 6:55:08 AM11/26/05
to

Even the Greens beat BNP.....and they are not taken that seriously!

UKIP pulled almost 3 times as many votes as BNP.

--
Alan "Ferrit" Ferris

()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")

Chris X

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 6:59:48 AM11/26/05
to

"Alan Ferris" <al...@spamddandd.com> wrote in message
news:4ajgo1ph32es8cnlc...@4ax.com...

Who cares what *you* think the British people "take seriously", Ferris.

> UKIP pulled almost 3 times as many votes as BNP.

And we all know what happened to *them*.

tw

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 7:55:22 AM11/26/05
to

"Chris X" <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote in message
news:XdadnZmWTbP...@giganews.com...

As I said, a small crowd of nobodies... less than 1/800th of the
electorate! LOL
How does that compare historically? You used to get more votes when you
still called yourselves the NF didn't you?


>
>


Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Chris X

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 11:20:34 AM11/26/05
to
"Guig" <yerawsittin@hame> wrote in message
news:9l1ho1988gkmnkc66...@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:02:29 -0000, "Chris X"
> <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>"Paul Hyett" <p...@nojunkmailplease.co.uk> wrote in message
>>news:kLLHg3Dx...@activist.demon.co.uk...
>>> You're even more irrelevant in Scotland that in England - they already
>>> *have* a nationalist party,
>>
>>Yaaaawn .... *not* a British nationalist party.
>>
> As has been proven we're more interested in the Scottish National
> Party than the English/British National Party/KKK.

Speeer chinch ? Speeer chinch pliz mista !

Paul Hyett

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 2:48:05 AM11/27/05
to
In uk.politics.misc on Sat, 26 Nov 2005 at 11:59:48, Chris X wrote :
>>>
>>>With almost a million votes for the British National Party in the 2004
>>>Euro
>>>election, it appears many people *do* want such a thing, (tw)at.
>>
>> Even the Greens beat BNP.....and they are not taken that seriously!
>
>Who cares what *you* think the British people "take seriously", Ferris.
>
>> UKIP pulled almost 3 times as many votes as BNP.
>
>And we all know what happened to *them*.

Doesn't say much for *your* chances then...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

Paul Hyett

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 2:46:51 AM11/27/05
to

Even the (unionist) Tories are suffering, so what chance have *you* got?
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

Chris X

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 3:55:25 AM11/27/05
to

"Paul Hyett" <p...@nojunkmailplease.co.uk> wrote in message
news:lca31vD1...@activist.demon.co.uk...

Hyett's getting angrier and angrier ;)


Ariadne

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 5:59:21 AM11/27/05
to

Another Scottish view:

BNP Scotland - why do they bother?

I was going to do my indepth dissection of the BNP's Scottish Manifesto
in this post, but I'm still laughing too hard. They're such a bunch of
idiots it's amazing to imagine that some actually take them seriously
enough to vote for them.

Any party which can SERIOUSLY claim that what Scotland needs is more
musical instrument manufacturers, farriers, saddlers and drystane
dykers isn't living in the real world, but the same bizarro cultural
wankland inhabited by Americans cooing over tartan and sporrans and
Braveheart. And what to make of the claim that books are regularly
rejected by Scottish schools on the grounds that their authors are
"White and English-speaking"? What language does the author think we
speak in Scotland? Mind you, that could explain the textbook shortage.
"Can't have this book, comrade, it's written entirely in English, and
that'll never do for the Higher English class. Haven't you got one
written in a combination of Mongolian and Dutch by a one-legged black
lesbian?"

As for "white" being used as a category for rejection, I don't know
what the BNP think Scottish schools are like. For a lot of the teachers
at my school, which was far from being politically correct,
"homosexual" meant "boy who isn't any good at football" and "mongol"
was a perfectly acceptable way to describe a kid with Down's Syndrome.
We read precisely ONE book by a black person in my entire school
career, and even then, it was a book by an English-speaking black
person (note to the BNP - yes, this is possible) which was good, as we
all spoke English. (I don't feel this point can be overstated.)

If you went to my old school and accused the teachers of picking books
solely on the basis of political correctness, you'd better be prepared
for a hefty dry-cleaning bill as the laughter would cause them to lose
control of their bladders. I never heard from any of my fellow Scots
ever that they went to school in some kind of politically correct
indoctrination camp where reading books by white writers got you a
punishment form and you weren't allowed to ask for a black pen in
class, but had to ask for a "pen of colour" or whatever nonsense is
being claimed by the rightwing this week. I suspect strongly that this
mythical school never existed and never will, except in daft manifestos
by the far right and the letters page of the Daily Mail.

[I've lost the URL for this but inputting the part about
'laughing' to Google will retrieve it]

Chris X

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 6:06:59 AM11/27/05
to

"Ariadne" <ari...@mac.hush.com> wrote in message
news:1133089161.6...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

>
> Paul Hyett wrote:
>> In uk.politics.misc on Sat, 26 Nov 2005 at 11:59:48, Chris X wrote :
>> >>>
>> >>>With almost a million votes for the British National Party in the 2004
>> >>>Euro
>> >>>election, it appears many people *do* want such a thing, (tw)at.
>> >>
>> >> Even the Greens beat BNP.....and they are not taken that seriously!
>> >
>> >Who cares what *you* think the British people "take seriously", Ferris.
>> >
>> >> UKIP pulled almost 3 times as many votes as BNP.
>> >
>> >And we all know what happened to *them*.
>>
>> Doesn't say much for *your* chances then...
>> --
>> Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
>
> Another Scottish view:
>
> BNP Scotland - why do they bother?

(Snip shite)

> [I've lost the URL for this but inputting the part about
> 'laughing' to Google will retrieve it]

http://www.20six.co.uk/justic/archive/2004/04/

Ah yes - no wonder you "lost" it - it's a Blog from one of your Communist
"friends" named "Justic" who, amongst other things, champions the causes of
the Baader Meinhoff gang, the Marxist Internet Archive and the World Power
Radical Bookshop. (Snigger !)

Message has been deleted

Ariadne

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 6:50:10 AM11/27/05
to

Chris X wrote:
> "Ariadne" <ari...@mac.hush.com> wrote in message
> news:1133089161.6...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> >
>
> > [I've lost the URL for this but inputting the part about
> > 'laughing' to Google will retrieve it]
>
> http://www.20six.co.uk/justic/archive/2004/04/
>
> Ah yes - no wonder you "lost" it - it's a Blog from one of your Communist
> "friends" named "Justic" who, amongst other things, champions the causes of
> the Baader Meinhoff gang, the Marxist Internet Archive and the World Power
> Radical Bookshop. (Snigger !)

But you can't refute a word of it despite that...

Chris X

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 7:37:47 AM11/27/05
to

"Ariadne" <ari...@mac.hush.com> wrote in message
news:1133092210.5...@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

The source refutes itself by its own very nature, hag.


h

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 7:45:33 AM11/27/05
to

"Guig" <yerawsittin@hame> wrote in message
news:8h6jo1ljhdc3s3qb5...@4ax.com...

> On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:20:34 -0000, "Chris X"
> <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>Speeer chinch ? Speeer chinch pliz mista !
>
> What's the matter? Are you Mexican? Please stop begging for money ...
> Do you not get enough taxpayers money via your giro?

Tell that to the Scotch Scroungers outside King's Cross Station in
Londonistan


Chris X

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 7:53:08 AM11/27/05
to

"h" <sur...@btincompetence.com> wrote in message
news:dmc9pe$aqe$1...@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk...

It isnae fair .... it isnae fair .... T'Anglish will nae gib me nae speeeer
chinch !


h

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 8:22:57 AM11/27/05
to

"Chris X" <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote in message
news:U-CdnaBQ_II...@giganews.com...
Ile awae hame an beat the wee wifey, jest affer i tek a piss in the phony
box,thet'll teech T'Anglish.


Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

h

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 2:06:53 PM11/27/05
to

"Guig" <yerawsittin@hame> wrote in message
news:07tjo1pcagclbklh7...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 13:22:57 -0000, "h" <sur...@btincompetence.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Ile awae hame an beat the wee wifey, jest affer i tek a piss in the phony
>>box,thet'll teech T'Anglish.
>>
>
> Dear oh dear, a very poor attempt there "h", only 3 out of 10, return
> to your master and have him beat you for your stupidity.

Och that isnae fair:-)
I don't have a master!
Besides the sentiment expressed is still so very true,BTW how did the
Scotchies get on with the rugby yesterday:-)))))


Message has been deleted

Chris X

unread,
Nov 28, 2005, 4:53:29 AM11/28/05
to
"Guig" <yerawsittin@hame> wrote in message
news:v0klo11et07jlius2...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:06:53 -0000, "h" <sur...@btincompetence.com>
> wrote:
>
>>BTW how did the
>>Scotchies get on with the rugby yesterday:-)))))
>>
> Actually they played really well, no one ever considered a victory
> over the All Blacks was at all possible but we shut them down in the
> 2nd half (7-7) and the score would have been closer if the try we
> scored in the 1st half had been allowed (neither the ref nor the
> replays could show the ball was down so they couldn't award it). And
> we played an attacking game turning down penalty goals in order to
> keep the game flowing. 3 points here and there aren't going to win you
> a game of that difficulty.
>
> Hopefully the progress wil continue into the 6 Nations ...

Translation - the Jocks lost 29 - 10 !
Yes, that's great "progress", glug ! Mwahahahahaha !

Magnus Paterson

unread,
Nov 28, 2005, 5:01:23 AM11/28/05
to
"Chris X" <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote in
news:QuednTeuGNqSThfe...@giganews.com:

And beat the English 4.5-2.5 at tennis. Mwahahaha yourself.

John Gilbert

unread,
Nov 28, 2005, 5:13:36 AM11/28/05
to
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:42:12 +0000, Guig <yerawsittin@hame> wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:06:53 -0000, "h" <sur...@btincompetence.com>
>wrote:
>

>>BTW how did the
>>Scotchies get on with the rugby yesterday:-)))))
>>
>

>Actually they played really well, no one ever considered a victory
>over the All Blacks was at all possible but we shut them down in the
>2nd half (7-7) and the score would have been closer if the try we
>scored in the 1st half had been allowed (neither the ref nor the
>replays could show the ball was down so they couldn't award it). And
>we played an attacking game turning down penalty goals in order to
>keep the game flowing. 3 points here and there aren't going to win you
>a game of that difficulty.
>
>Hopefully the progress wil continue into the 6 Nations ...

What astonishing enthusiasm for such a resounding defeat <g>
I do so hope Scotland don't win a match by a convincing margin, or I
fear we shall see Guig spontaneously combust!

Regards,
John G


Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Chris X

unread,
Nov 28, 2005, 3:29:40 PM11/28/05
to
"Guig" <yerawsittin@hame> wrote in message
news:gkpmo19pecs8vtb56...@4ax.com...

> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 09:53:29 -0000, "Chris X"
> <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>> Hopefully the progress wil continue into the 6 Nations ...
>>
>>Translation - the Jocks lost 29 - 10 !
>>Yes, that's great "progress", glug ! Mwahahahahaha !
>
> If you did anything with your life other than post here every night
> you would maybe know something about rugby ... but there ye go.

Oh, I didn't realise the team with the lowest score wins ! How silly of
me, John McGuigan !


Magnus Paterson

unread,
Nov 29, 2005, 4:44:40 AM11/29/05
to
Guig <yerawsittin@hame> wrote in
news:25tjo1hq9i0v954mj...@4ax.com:

> On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 12:53:08 -0000, "Chris X"
> <Chr...@postmaster.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>It isnae fair .... it isnae fair .... T'Anglish will nae gib me nae
>>speeeer chinch !
>

> Now there's a very interesting turn of phrase.
>
> It still seems to be Mexican though.
>

He's morphing into Henderson.

Ariadne

unread,
Nov 29, 2005, 6:42:00 AM11/29/05
to
Is Henderson an Arab?

tom_s...@yahoo.co.uk

unread,
Dec 17, 2005, 2:01:31 PM12/17/05
to

Chris X wrote:
> http://www.bnp.org.uk/reg_showarticle.php?contentID=435
>
> The British National Party in Scotland has had its own unique emblem since
> 2001. The design was produced during a workshop meeting in Glasgow with
> Party members from all over Scotland with the purposes of emphasising that
> the BNP was not just an English party.
>
> Three teams were formed for the workshop and rotated around three different
> areas for development, which were culture, publicity and emblem design.
>
> Amazingly all three groups produced virtually the same design during their
> alloted times.
>
> The first thistle design above was the result of combining the three drafts
> and has been used on virtually all Scottish BNP leaflets since and was
> registered with the Electoral Commission for use in our election campaigns.
>
> This month however, a new updated emblem has been registered with the
> Electoral Commission following a consultation of Scottish Organisers and
> Fundholders which unanimously selected the new design.
>
> Growing confidence
>
> The new bolder emblem reflects the growing confidence of BNP Scotland and
> our intention to stamp our mark on the electoral landscape in Scotland. The
> next Holyrood elections are due in May 2007 and prospective candidates have
> already come forward for some regional lists. Initial indications point to
> the strong possibility of a breakthrough in Glasgow if local activists put
> in the effort.
>
> The BNP in Scotland is fiercely proud of our Scottish identity, culture and
> heritage as can be seen in our manifesto for the previous Holyrood election
> and this brave new logo reinforces our commitment to preserving tradition at
> a time when other so called Scottish nationalists are falling over
> themselves to dilute that through the promotion of mass immigration.


Aye, aye, aye. That'll be why the Christian Party gets more votes than
the your Fascists I suppose?

> *************************
>
> "If I'd have wanted to die for Israel, I'd have joined the South Lebanon
> Army."
> - British Army Private, Iraq, July 2003
>
> http://www.bnp.org.uk
> http://www.bnp.org.uk/policies/policies.htm
> http://www.nowarforisrael.com
> http://www.no2id.org

Christopher

unread,
Dec 17, 2005, 2:16:51 PM12/17/05
to

Do you even know what the dictionary word Fascist means?

--

Christopher

0 new messages