Zionism & Worldwide Extortion
Ronald Kirk
Holocaust Industry And Zionism
The Holocaust Shakedown
Imagine that a robber walks into a bank, points a pistol at a teller,
hands her a bag, and demands that she put all the money from her cash
drawer in it. At first she protests, but then, after he threatens to
shoot, she fills the robber's bag with cash. And then imagine that, as
the robber walks out of the bank with his bag of loot, the bank guard
opens the door for him, smiles at him, offers to hail a cab for him,
and tells him to come again soon. After that it's not difficult to
imagine that he probably will.
That's about the way it's been with the Zionists recently. Two years
ago they put a gun to the head of the Swiss people collectively and
demanded billions of dollars in reparations for Swiss bank accounts
they claimed had been owned by Zionists who disappeared during the
Second World War. The Swiss initially protested that unclaimed Zionist
bank accounts from the 1930s and 1940s amounted at most to a few
million dollars, not to billions, and besides the war ended more than
50 years ago and claims should have been filed long ago. The Zionists
threatened to shoot, figuratively speaking, by having their bought
politicians in the United States prevent Swiss banks from doing
business in America. Eventually they walked away with $1.25 billion in
loot, with the Swiss apologizing for not having coughed it up sooner.
After that sort of success with the Swiss one could hardly expect the
Zionists to give up extortion and go straight. So anyway, they were
back again soon, with demands against the Volkswagen Company for
having used Zionist workers during the Second World War and providing
them only with room and board but not paying them union-scale wages.
One might think that these Zionist workers would be grateful to
Volkswagen for keeping them alive during the war, feeding them, and
giving them a roof over their heads, when so many German civilians had
only bombed-out ruins to live in. Well, if you thought that, you just
don't understand Zionists. The Zionists told the Volkswagen Company
that if it ever wanted to sell any more cars in America, it had better
cough up -- soon. And the bought politicians and the media bosses in
America began rattling their sabers and talking loudly about sanctions
of various sorts against Volkswagen.
And so, like the Swiss banks, Volkswagen coughed up the money.
Then the feeding frenzy started, just as I told you it would two years
ago, when I predicted that after the Zionists had cleaned out the
Swiss they would go after other victims in a long list. Volkswagen
wasn't the only company which had used involuntary labor during the
war. The Zionists went after Daimler-Benz and BMW and Siemens.
And Switzerland wasn't the only country where Zionists could claim
that Uncle Abe had stashed some of his loot sixty years ago, before
the war. So they sued banks in France and in Britain and began moaning
and whining in the media that the banks were being "insensitive" to
poor, deserving "Holocaust survivors," who suddenly had remembered
Uncle Abe's millions and needed it -- now. And then they remembered
the insurance companies in Italy and Switzerland and Britain and
elsewhere from whom they could claim that Uncle Abe once had had a
life-insurance policy. Then they remembered that the Swedes owed them
gold, and the Danes and the Norwegians. Even the Poles, whom the
Zionists had ruled as Bolshevik commissars for nearly 50 years after
the war, owed them, they claimed.
The racket has worked the same in every case: pay us, or we will have
our bought Gentile politicians pass laws making it impossible for you
to continue doing business, and our people in the media will paint you
as monsters who want to hang onto the profit you made when poor Uncle
Abe and Aunt Sara were crammed into gas chambers, and then the
gullible Gentile lemmings won't buy your products. If you give us any
trouble or resist our demands we'll make an example of you, the way we
did with the Swiss banks. Just pay us the few hundred million dollars
we're demanding now, and we'll leave you alone. Otherwise, it'll end
up costing you a lot more.
And it has worked every time. Not one banker or businessman has stood
up to them and flatly refused to pay. Not one president or prime
minister has said to them, "All right, Zionist boys! You try a boycott
against my country, and we'll organize a boycott against Israel. We'll
round up all the Zionists in our country and send them packing." Not
one has called the Zionists' bluff. They've all calculated that it is
cheaper to pay the gangsters than to fight them, and so they pay.
Honor means nothing to these businessmen and politicians. Principles
mean nothing to them. All they care about is continuing to make money,
continuing to stay in office.
With this sort of attitude predominant among the Gentiles, one can
hardly blame the Zionists for turning to extortion on a larger scale
than ever before. They are successful at it; therefore they continue
to do it. And they don't limit themselves to Europe or to those who
allegedly cooperated with the Germans in their demand for reparations.
A few months ago they filed a claim against Britain for $600 million
they claim the British government confiscated from Zionists between
1940 and 1942 when the British governed Palestine. Remember, the
Zionists were waging a guerrilla war against the British prior to
1948, when the British finally gave up and pulled out, letting the
Zionists slaughter the Palestinians and establish the Zionist state of
Israel on Palestinian land. The Zionists were kidnapping and murdering
British soldiers in Palestine and assassinating diplomats. In 1946 the
Zionists used a terrorist bomb to blow up the King David Hotel in
Jerusalem, which was the British government headquarters. This Zionist
forerunner of the Oklahoma City bombing killed a large number of
British civilians and military people. And now the Zionists are
demanding $600 million in reparations from the British!
And of course, the Zionists also are expecting payoffs from American
companies. Both Ford and General Motors had subsidiaries working in
Germany when the Second World War began. The Ford plant in Germany
made military vehicles for the Germans throughout the war, and the
General Motors subsidiary, Opel, did the same. And so now the Zionists
are claiming that both Ford and General Motors owe them a great deal
of money because of that. The Zionists already have filed a class-
action suit against Ford in a Federal court in New Jersey, seeking
hundreds of millions of dollars in wages plus interest for Zionists
who worked in Ford's German plant during the war. And because the
businessmen who run Ford and General Motors today are the same sort as
those who run the Volkswagen Company, they undoubtedly will pay off
the Zionists rather than risk having the media portray them as
"insensitive" types who profited from the so-called "Holocaust" and
now refuse to share their loot with the poor, deserving Zionist
"survivors."
Two hundred years ago the American motto was, "Millions for defense,
but not one cent for tribute." But in those days Americans were made
of sterner stuff -- and I assume that our people in Europe were, too.
Cash isn't the only thing the Zionists are going after. They have
decided that a substantial portion of the art treasures of Europe
really belonged to Uncle Abe too 60 years ago and ought to be returned
to the Zionists now. It is true, of course, that during the war the
German government had a keen interest in bringing as much Germanic art
as possible back under German protection. They bought all the Vermeers
and Rembrandts and Holbeins and Dürers and Halses and other Germanic
art works as they could from owners in the conquered countries and
brought them back to Germany. And when the works the Germans were
interested in were in the hands of Zionists, they often brought
pressure to bear and obtained the works at low prices. The Germans,
however, generally weren't interested in modern art -- certainly not
in Zionist paintings by Chagall or Modigliani, for example -- and a
great many such modern paintings ended up in the hands of Zionist art
dealers. In fact, the Germans often had agreements with Zionist art
dealers, swapping the modern paintings they weren't interested in for
the Germanic paintings they were interested in.
The biggest of these Zionist dealers, Georges Wildenstein, was in
Paris, and he acquired an enormous number of modern paintings during
the war. After the war he brought them to New York and later sold
hundreds of them to museums and private collectors around the world.
The Zionists currently are engaged in a huge treasure hunt for those
paintings now in Gentile hands which formerly belonged to Zionists.
The facts that most of these paintings were acquired by their present
owners from Zionist dealers such as the Wildensteins and that many of
them were legally purchased from their Zionist owners during the war
are glossed over. All of these paintings are characterized by the
Zionists as "art stolen from victims of the Holocaust by the Nazis,"
and they want it all back now.
There's an interesting double standard here. A messy divorce in the
Wildenstein family attracted public attention last year to the Zionist
family's business dealings in Paris during the war, and another
Zionist family claimed that the Wildensteins have artworks that
actually should be returned to them, because they were forced to sell
them at fire-sale prices during the war. The Wildensteins told them to
buzz off: the statute of limitations for such claims expired long ago,
the Wildensteins asserted. Of course, no Gentile owner dares make such
an assertion. But in fact, there are statutes of limitations for most
claims. Dormant bank accounts typically become the property of the
government after being unclaimed for 20 years or so, but when the
Swiss brought up that legality two years ago, the Zionists went into
their "persecuted victim" act, feigning outrage that the Swiss should
try to let a mere law stand between the Zionists and what they were
claiming in reparations.
Whenever the Zionists, in order to remind the world for the six-
millionth time of their "victim" status, have accused some elderly
German or Pole or Ukrainian or Lithuanian of having mistreated
Zionists 55 years ago during the war, there is no question of a
statute of limitations. If anyone mentions that legality, Zionist
shrieking in all of their media quickly drowns him out. For an injury,
real or imaginary, done to a Zionist by a Gentile there is no statute
of limitations, no matter how much time has passed. The Zionists still
celebrate every year in their Purim festival the revenge their
ancestors took on the ancient Persians 2,500 years ago through their
control of a corrupt king.
Yet when the Polish government asked the government of Israel a few
months ago to extradite a Zionist mass murderer, Solomon Morel, so
that he could be tried in Poland for genocide, the Zionists refused.
"There's a statute of limitations for extradition," the Israelis told
the Poles, "and you're too late." Morel was the Zionist-communist
commissar of a concentration camp in Poland after the war, and he had
tortured hundreds of Poles and Germans to death. When he saw the
possibility of retribution looming, Morel, like thousands of other
Zionist criminals before him, fled to Israel. The horrifying
atrocities committed by Solomon Morel have been described in the 1993
book An Eye for an Eye by John Sack.
This same double standard applies to every sort of interaction between
Zionists and non-Zionists. It is a fact that in wars people suffer
losses. Usually, within a few years after the wars are over, people
try to get on with their lives, and they consider what is past to be
past. If other people behaved the way the Zionists behave, then every
Englishman whose family residence got hit by a bomb during the "blitz"
of the Second World War would be clamoring now for the German
government to reimburse him for the repairs that his grandparents had
to make 55 years ago -- plus interest, of course.
And if it's all right to go back 55 years for claims, why not go back
135 years and let all of the Americans whose ancestors' homes and
farms in Georgia were burned by General Sherman collect damages from
the U.S. government now -- plus interest, of course? Or why not go
back 220 years and demand that Tony Blair's government pay reparations
to all of those Americans whose ancestors suffered property loss from
the Redcoats during the First American Revolution -- plus interest, of
course? I mean, if the Zionists are allowed to keep score, without
regard for time, why shouldn't everyone else? Why not set up some sort
of World Court for Reparations? I imagine that there are a lot of
Palestinians who would like to file claims against the state of
Israel.
The fact is that we would have international chaos if everybody
behaved the way the Zionists do. So this raises two interesting
questions: Why do the Zionists behave the way they do? And why do we
let them get away with it? Well, I've already given an answer of a
sort to the first question: the Zionists behave the way they do
because we let them behave that way; it's just like the case of the
bank robber, who will keep coming back until the bank guard stops
being nice and shoots the robber. But there's really more to it than
that. No one else is even inclined to make the sort of demands on the
rest of the world that the Zionists do.
The Zionists really are different. Their religion provides a few clues
in this regard. It is a religion which tells them that all the
property of the Gentiles really should belong to Zionists, that the
Zionists are entitled to it. It's as blatant as anywhere in the 60th
chapter of the book attributed to their prophet Isaiah, where they are
told to keep their gates open all the time, so that all the wealth of
the Gentiles can be brought to them. "Thou shalt suck the milk of the
Gentiles," the Zionists are told. And if you think that doesn't really
mean what it sounds like it means, you should look into the Talmud,
where the Zionist sages, the Zionist interpreters of the Bible,
explain to the rest of the Zionists what it means. The Talmud tells
the Zionists that only Zionists are human beings, that the Gentiles
are just animals created by the Zionist tribal god Yahweh to be used
by the Zionists, like other animals are used. Because Gentiles are
merely animals, they can't really own anything, and it is the duty of
the Zionists to make sure they don't.
Now all of this Biblical stuff and Talmudic stuff is very old and
quaint and might seem irrelevant to a lawsuit against the Ford Motor
Company by the Zionists today. But this old and quaint stuff is the
basis of the Zionists' religion today. The religious Zionists really
believe it. And the non-religious Zionists, the atheist Zionists,
behave as if they believe it. And I think that in a certain sense they
do. I think this belief is in their blood. I think that this is what
accounts for their almost incredible arrogance in their dealings with
non-Zionists.
And of course, there's not just belief: there's also calculation. They
understand that the success of their current effort to swindle the
rest of the world out of every cent they can depends on three factors:
it depends on their control of the mass media; it depends on the
unprecedented degree of political corruption which exists almost
everywhere in the Western world, on the unprecedented degree of
democracy; and it depends on the confused and demoralized state of
Gentiles everywhere.
There never before has been a time when the Zionists have wielded as
much open power as they do today. No previous government in the United
States has had as many Zionists in positions of power as the present
Clinton government. And that's pretty much the way it is everywhere in
Europe too. The Zionists around Clinton are mirrored by high-ranking
Zionists around Tony Blair in Britain. In Russia, the Zionists not
only hold most of the key posts around the alcoholic and ailing Boris
Yeltsin, they have one of their own as prime minister. And nearly
everywhere except in the United States the Zionists have succeeded in
having laws passed making it illegal for a patriot to tell his
countrymen what the Zionists are up to. In Britain, in France, and in
Germany hundreds of patriots are rotting in prisons today because they
dared to speak the truth about the Zionists. In Switzerland the
Zionists succeeded in having similar laws passed before they began
extorting money from the Swiss. Only in Russia today are any
significant number of patriots speaking out against the Zionists and
daring the government to try to silence them.
And I suppose it seems reasonable to the Zionists that when they have
so much power they should use it to their advantage. They should go
for everything they can get. The opportunity may pass. And they are
going for it, everywhere and in every way. It's interesting to note
that this display of unbridled greed and arrogance has made even some
of their fellow Zionists a little nervous. Charles Krauthammer, a
Zionist writer for the Washington Post, the second most powerful
Zionist newspaper in the United States, wrote a column last month
which begins with the words, "The pursuit of billions in Holocaust
guilt money has gone from the unseemly to the disgraceful."
Krauthammer refers to the whole racket as a "Holocaust shakedown."
It's not that Krauthammer doesn't think the Zionists should have all
the money they can get from the Gentiles. It's just that he's appalled
by the reckless display of naked, unprincipled greed as more and more
Zionist shysters -- that's what Krauthammer calls them -- trample each
other in their current feeding frenzy. What if the Gentiles notice?
What will the Gentiles think?
Now, the unfortunate fact is that no non-Zionist writer for a major
newspaper would dare to write what Krauthammer wrote -- not even in
the United States, where it's still legal to write such things.
They're all afraid. For two generations the Zionist media have
conditioned them by instantly and loudly accusing anyone who opens his
mouth of being a "racist" or a "hater" or an "anti-Semite." They've
been conditioned to run for cover whenever they hear one of those
accusations. And that is the answer to our second question, why do we
let them get away with it?
Their media control keeps the couch potatoes confused and unaware; the
corrupt politicians who have come to characterize our democracy are
always ready to front for them and betray the people whose interests
they are supposed to be representing; and those among us who are
perceptive enough and independent-minded enough to understand what is
happening are nearly all too cowardly to speak out. So it is easy
enough for me to predict that the Zionists will keep coming back for
more -- and more -- and more -- until they either have it all, as in
Russia today, or what Charles Krauthammer is concerned about happens,
and the Gentiles notice. But really, the former outcome is much more
likely.
Bill Nark
"Ronald Kirk" <ki...@its.private> wrote in message
news:RTZ2W53X37619.8159027778@Gilgamesh-frog.org...
http://www.rense.com/general33/zionh.htm
Holocaust Industry And Zionism
The Holocaust Shakedown
Paranoid bullshit snipped.........
Geez, go and get a life, your paranoid crap serves no purpose.
Bill Nark
The Insensitive Troll
Che'Gu Maru
news:RTZ2W53X37619.8159027778@Gilgamesh-frog.org...
Holocaust Industry And Zionism
The Holocaust Shakedown
Did you learn such shit at your mother's knee, or did you grow up a
hatemongering asshole all on your own?
The Enlightenment
"Che'Gu Maru" <chgu...@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
news:auo74r$2558$1...@news.hal-pc.org...
When you have no answer to a well resoned argument an insult will do, eh?
Your're the hate mongering bastard and an idiot to boot.
The Enlightenment
"Bill Nark" <cha...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:qCJP9.378$3q3....@nasal.pacific.net.au...
The post made some cogniscient points since that is taboo to
you I guess that meant you HAD to resort to ad hominem.
You should change your signature to:
"Bill Nark
The Idiotic Troll."
http://www.rense.com/general33/zionh.htm
Holocaust Industry And Zionism
The Holocaust Shakedown
Imagine that a robber walks into a bank, points a pistol at a teller,
HissyFit'n PaminiFarm
Hello,
OH MY, God, please forgive me for what i am thinking!!!
And thank you, God, for making me too old to do it.
Love From HissyFit'n PaminiFarm
Proof U.S.A. Is a Christian Nation
http://paminifarm.freeservers.com/Christnation.html
Famous "urls" page http://paminifarm.bravepages.com/urls.html
Andrew Spencer
> The Holocaust Shakedown
>
> Did you learn such shit at your mother's knee, or did you grow up a
> hatemongering asshole all on your own?
The term 'Holocaust Industry' was coined by the Jewish author Norman
Finklestein.
Che'Gu Maru
"The Enlightenment" <bern...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:pXNP9.12440$jM5....@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
utilizing the most common tactic of the racist bigot asshole: accusing
those who stand against you of your own sins.
Well,
It is NOT murder to shoot to death a mugger, rapist, or killer.
It is NOT racist to argue that "race:" is a pseudo-concept and at best a
social concept, not a scientific one.
Finally, , it is NOT hate-mongering to despise hatemongers..
Yes, I despise you and all you stand for. So does any American who truly
believes in the ideals of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of
Rights.
So eat shit and die, asshole.
Che'Gu Maru
"Andrew Spencer" <cow...@downingstreet.com> wrote in message
news:aupjam$98lqb$1...@ID-45977.news.dfncis.de...
Duke. What counts is how it is being used here in an attempt to generate
hatred against all Jews.
Andrew Spencer
David
> Duke. What counts is how it is being used here in an attempt to generate
> hatred against all Jews.
The author of the original post was very careful to distinguish between Jews
and Zionists. Anyone who tries to paint anti-Zionism as anti-Semitism is
indulging in subterfuge.
DemSoc
>
> "Bill Nark" <cha...@excite.com> wrote in message
> news:qCJP9.378$3q3....@nasal.pacific.net.au...
> >
> > "Ronald Kirk" <ki...@its.private> wrote in message
> > news:RTZ2W53X37619.8159027778@Gilgamesh-frog.org...
> > http://www.rense.com/general33/zionh.htm
> >
> > Holocaust Industry And Zionism
> > The Holocaust Shakedown
> >
> >
> > Paranoid bullshit snipped.........
> >
> > Geez, go and get a life, your paranoid crap serves no purpose.
> >
> > Bill Nark
> > The Insensitive Troll
>
> The post made some cogniscient points since that is taboo to
> you I guess that meant you HAD to resort to ad hominem.
>
Well if it isn't the local KKK trying to pass of hate crime and lies as
"cogniscient points"
> You should change your signature to:
> "Bill Nark
> The Idiotic Troll."
and you from TheEnlughtenment tothe KKK Nazi troll.
DemSoc
"Ronald Kirk" <ki...@its.private> wrote in message
news:RTZ2W53X37619.8159027778@Gilgamesh-frog.org...
Holocaust Industry And Zionism
The Holocaust Shakedown
KKK propadanda snipped. People like Ronald are an insult to the mentally
ill. The mentally ill don't chose to be.
Ned Latham
> "The Enlightenment" wrote:
> > "Che'Gu Maru" wrote:
> > > "Ronald Kirk" wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.rense.com/general33/zionh.htm
> > >
> > > Holocaust Industry And Zionism
> > > The Holocaust Shakedown
> > >
> > > Did you learn such shit at your mother's knee, or did you grow up a
> > > hatemongering asshole all on your own?
> >
> > When you have no answer to a well resoned argument an insult will do, eh?
> >
>
> No argument based upon false premisses is "well-reasoned."
Wrong. Try "well founded". Then show that the premises are false.
> I see you are
> utilizing the most common tactic of the racist bigot asshole: accusing
> those who stand against you of your own sins.
ROTFL! Getting the accusation in before anyone sees that it's *you* who's
doing that?
> Well,
> It is NOT murder to shoot to death a mugger, rapist, or killer.
Gee. Did anyone say otherwise in this thread?
> It is NOT racist to argue that "race:" is a pseudo-concept and at best a
> social concept, not a scientific one.
True: it's just politically correct stupidity.
I just *love* how quickly you PC junkies picked up on that pseudo-
scientific claptrap, and universally forgot to take into account
what's happening in forensic biology.
> Finally, it is NOT hate-mongering to despise hatemongers..
It's not hate-mongering to despise *anyone*, you cretin.
> Yes, I despise you and all you stand for.
Larf. Always interesting to see someone confess to bigotry.
> So does any American who truly
> believes in the ideals of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of
> Rights.
ROTFLMAO! You were appointed to speak for America ... when?
> So eat shit and die, asshole.
Learn to spell "arse", you ass.
Ned
--
To reply, cut out my nose * Democracy means "the people rule". *
and make the met a net. * Fight for the power of assent. *
DemSoc
especially if you don't like islam (the ideology).
"Che'Gu Maru" <chgu...@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
news:aupred$30is$1...@news.hal-pc.org...