Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"Karma Bombs" by Will Dockery [11-5-02]

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 9:23:05 AM1/16/06
to

Peter J Ross wrote:
> > "Will Dockery" wrote:

"Karma Bombs" by Will Dockery, posted to Usenet November 5 2002:
<http://tinyurl.com/bbzt6>

> >> >> >> >> >You left Michael Cook off your list.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> He's never stolen poetry, or claimed to have stolen
> >> >> >> >> poetry, fuckhead.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >You're wrong again, Stampeder-breath, and I can prove it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You can't prove shit.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If you could, you would.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I proved it to Stu last month when he wrote similar statements,
> >> >> >and not only did he apologise and shut up... he left the
> >> >> >newsgroups.
> >> >>
> >> >> You're fucken delusional.
> >> >
> >> > Since you <snipped> the evidence that Michael Cook not only stole
> >> > the poem "Karma Bombs", made a recording of it, and by leaving my
> >> > name off it, assumed credit for writing it [theft /and/
> >> > plagiarism], I'll reproduce an excerpt of it here,
> >> > Stampeder-breath:
> >>
> >> Thank you for posting the evidence that God (alias Michael Cook)
> >> didn't steal your "poem",
> >
> > Cook took "Karma Bombs", recorded an Mp3 of it and left my name off.
>
<http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.arts.poetry.comments/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6
070>
>
> | From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> | Karma Bombs.mp3
>
> Are you now claiming that your name isn't Will Dockery?
>
> >> Next, you might like to post the evidence that you took the
> >> recording he made for you
> >
> > For me? He made it for /himself/.
>
> I see. So that's why he posted a link to it for you, is it?
>
> >> and tried to sell it on your pathetic vanity site without his
> >> permission, without attribution to him,
> >
> > Attribution--- I wrote "Karma Bombs" but Cook's recording of it
> > never attributed "Will Dockery" as the writer anywhere... that's
> > plagiarism.
>
> See link above, pathetic liar.
>
> >> and without arranging for him to have a share of the profits, if
> >> any.
> >
> > It's my poem,
>
> It isn't a poem, Dreck-generator.
>
> > Cook made a recording of it without permission [theft] and by
> > posting it on his website without "attribution" it was also
> > plagiarism.
>
> See link above, pathetic liar.
>
> > So I took /my property/ back... as the creator of the work, and
> > profits should come to /me/, not to the inept theif.
>
> So you still think you have a right to profit from Michael's work
> without permission. Why am I not surprised?
>
> By the way, did you ever pay Michael for the video-editing work he did
> for you?
>
> >> If you can't find that evidence In The Archives, I can.
> >
> > Go for it.
>
> Here's the post in which I demonstrated that you're a spammer, a liar
> and a thief:
> <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3d11321655ab8b95>
>
> I was under the impression that you removed the stolen material from
> your kookpage when you were caught, but what's this?
>
> http://www.lulu.com/content/32109
>
> Why are you still attempting to sell Michael Cook's recording without
> even attributing it to him? Why have you put a "standard copyright
> notice" on it? Why are you such a pathetic lying thief?
>
> Not that your attempt is likely to be successful, since the "preview"
> seems to contain the whole recording.
>
> Now, are you going to remove the stolen recording, or are you going to
> lose your lulu.com access?
>
> > I can then post the link of my first posting of "Karma Bombs",
>
> Please do. It was one of your most hilarious piles of dreck.
>
> > where Cook stole his material from.
>
> See links above, pathetic lying thief.

See this link, plagiarist-defender:

<http://www.spraci.net/boards/x2detroit/x0video/98909/>

I wrote "Karma Bombs", Michael Cook didn't... his use of it without
permission is theft, and posting it under his name rather than mine is
plagiarism.

--
"Mirror Twins" by Will Dockery:
http://www.myspace.com/dockeryconleytrio

Recent poetry:
http://blog.myspace.com/dockeryconleytrio

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 12:01:38 PM1/16/06
to

"Peter J Ross" wrote
> > Peter J Ross wrote:

"Karma Bombs" by Will Dockery, posted to Usenet November 5 2002:
<http://tinyurl.com/bbzt6>

See link above, pathetic lying hypocrite.

> > See this link, plagiarist-defender:
> >
<http://www.spraci.net/boards/x2detroit/x0video/98909/>
>

> It was funny at the time, and the fact that you're still chewing the
> same hook more than two years later makes it funnier still. All hail
> Michael Cook!


>
> > I wrote "Karma Bombs", Michael Cook didn't...
>

> That would have been obvious even if you'd posted it anonymously,
> Dreckery. Your dreck is beyond even parody.

Whatever your opinion, it's still my creation, my property.

BTW, what Cook did was /not/ parody, as in the case of his photo parodies of
Bishop and Chuck... he used "Karma Bombs" word-for-word with no changes,
except to replace his name with mine.

> > his use of it without permission is theft, and posting it under his
> > name rather than mine is plagiarism.
>

> If he had done either of those things, you might appear to be
> something other than a delusional, ranting nutjob who can't read.
>
> So tell me: have you removed the stolen recording from your kooksite
> yet?

It was mine when Cook stole it, and it's /mine/ now.

> And speaking of your inability to read, when are you going to work out
> that even your old slurp-mate Tommy Tosser is laughing at you now?

Bishop only seems to worry when it's him that's being stolen from... not my
problem, and I've often stated that Cook's photo parodies were sometimes
hilarious, anyhow.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 12:08:18 PM1/16/06
to
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:01:38 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

> pathetic lying hypocrite

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 2:08:28 PM1/16/06
to

"Peter J Ross" wrote:

> >Will Dockery wrote:
>
> > "Karma Bombs" by Will Dockery, posted to Usenet November 5 2002:
<http://tinyurl.com/bbzt6>
>
> <link snipped because somebody might read it and want to poke their
> eyes out with red-hot needles>

>
> > See link above, pathetic lying hypocrite.
>
> Please show me the post where I claimed that anybody other than you
> wrote the above steaming heap of dried pigeon-vomit, Dreckery. If I
> ever said such a thing, I'd be guilty of gross calumny.

You're confused already, PJR?

The discussion was about Michael Cook /stealing/ the poem "Karma Bombs".

> <snip Dreckery trying to divert attention from his attempt to make a
> dollar by stealing>

It's my writing, so the above comment is impossibly stupid.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 2:42:13 PM1/16/06
to
Jinn Wins wrote:
> "Peter J Ross" wrote:
>
> > <snip Dreckery trying to divert attention from his attempt to make a
> > dollar by stealing>
>
> Hey, moron, put up your stolen pictures.
>
> C'mon, coward.

Looks like the photographs are /history/, JW.

Jinn Wins

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 2:51:55 PM1/16/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1137440533.4...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

> Jinn Wins wrote:
>> "Peter J Ross" wrote:
>>
>> > <snip Dreckery trying to divert attention from his attempt to make a
>> > dollar by stealing>
>>
>> Hey, moron, put up your stolen pictures.
>>
>> C'mon, coward.
>
> Looks like the photographs are /history/, JW.

No. I have them all.

I simply want them to put them up so I can point to theirs
and then point to mine.

I don't feel the same about it since finding out that suing
would cost too much, be boring, not get anything, since
you've seen the Sat. pic.

I wouldn't sue him without very good sense that I could actually
collect at least $20,000. C'mon, Will... Where would that happen
in this picture: http://tinyurl.com/dqccc

Why bother?


--
AJ - "I'm much better than you." :)
- RAP and AAPC
Dylan Thomas, "Rage Poet of the Year",
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006
- mikey cook memorial, (RIP)
Porn Compositing Award of Excellence
2005, 2006, 2007
- AUK, AHM "KOOK Trainer Emeritus"
(for training peewee(PJR) and mikey cook)
2003, 2004, 2005, 2006
- 'ennis M Hammes Quitclaim Brevity Award
2002, 2003

Feel the love:
http://Clitin.Com
*** A Wanking Service Agency ***
(currently free)

Kook websites:
http://baba-nude.blogspot.com
http://baba-fart.blogspot.com
http://wormfarmer.blogspot.com

Usenet Porn-d'Art slideshows:
http://Clitin.Com/X3
http://Clitin.Com/Art-Cody
http://Clitin.Com/Art-PT
http://Clitin.Com/Art-CC
http://Clitin.Com/Art-VB
http://Clitin.Com/Chmi
http://Clitin.Com/Casey
http://Clitin.Com/AshleyLauren

Some personal movies:
http://Clitin.Com/GB.wmv
http://Clitin.Com/ZappyMorn.wmv

Peter J Ross

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 3:20:35 PM1/16/06
to
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:08:28 -0500, Will Dockery
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote in rec.arts.poems:

> "Peter J Ross" wrote:
>> >Will Dockery wrote:
>>
>> > "Karma Bombs" by Will Dockery, posted to Usenet November 5 2002:

[link to dreck snipped]

>> <link snipped because somebody might read it and want to poke their
>> eyes out with red-hot needles>
>>
>> > See link above, pathetic lying hypocrite.
>>
>> Please show me the post where I claimed that anybody other than you
>> wrote the above steaming heap of dried pigeon-vomit, Dreckery. If I
>> ever said such a thing, I'd be guilty of gross calumny.
>
> You're confused already, PJR?

Not confused, but baffled. After five years, I thought I knew all
there was to know about the behaviour of stupid people on Usenet, but
you've succeeded in demonstrating a new twist.

Let me try to spell it out for you:

If you post a link to show that you wrote "Kamper Buns" or whatever
the dreck is called, and then claim that your link proves me a liar,
YOU ALSO HAVE TO SHOW THAT I SAID YOU DIDN'T WRITE IT.

Got it yet?

I wouldn't accuse even Sharon McElroy of writing your dreck. Even she
wrote a tolerable first draft once in a hundred attempts.

Dammit, I wouldn't accuse even K*nny "I wish I were a snowflake
dancing in the sky" Ch*ffin of writing your dreck!

Have you yet understood that nobody who had half a brain and more
blood than alcohol in his or her veins would WANT to be identified as
the author of your dreck?

> The discussion was about Michael Cook /stealing/ the poem "Karma Bombs".

What discussion? A few hours ago, I demonstrated, for the umpteenth
time, that you're a lying thief who lies about Michael Cook and steals
his work. Now, I'm just smacking you around until a more entertaining
loon shows up, not attempting to discuss anything with you. If I ever
thought you were capable of rational discussion, that would make me a
kook just like you.

>> <snip Dreckery trying to divert attention from his attempt to make a
>> dollar by stealing>
>
> It's my writing, so the above comment is impossibly stupid.

I think Jimmy Page should post an MP3 of Frank Zappa's recording of
"Stairway to Heaven" at lulu.com and charge a dollar for each
download. It's his writing, after all!

M O R O N .


PJR :-)
--
Have you been touched ___ ___ Hammer of Thor, Jan 2006
by His noodly / _ \ / _ \
appendage? ( (_) )( (_) ) Pierre Salinger Memorial
\_ _/ \_ _/ Hook, Line & Sinker, Dec
STOP GLOBAL __ _.-\\----//--._ 2003 & May 2005
WARMING _ / _\___.-'/ _| / _\ /\/\`-._.-.__ _
NOW, (_\_)| \___ ||_ ((_ //\/\\ _.-._ \-' ) AHM Wittiest
JIM LAD! \__) __) | _| _) ) || || (_ \_.-' Troll of the
/_-. || \_/ || .-'-.\ Year, 2003
http:// _._// / .--._______.-'\ \ \\__._ 2004 & 2005
www. /_._/ \ \ )) \__._)
venganza (/ _.-') ( `-._ wsd 42 ~ mhm 34x8
.org/ (_.-' :F_P: `--._) smeeter 30 ~ mwpl 12

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 4:24:04 PM1/16/06
to
Peter J Ross wrote:
> >Will Dockery wrote:
>
> > "Karma Bombs" by Will Dockery, posted to Usenet November 5 2002: <http://tinyurl.com/bbzt6>

>
> [link to dreck snipped]
>
> >> <link snipped because somebody might read it and want to poke their
> >> eyes out with red-hot needles>
> >>
> >> > See link above, pathetic lying hypocrite.
> >>
> >> Please show me the post where I claimed that anybody other than you
> >> wrote the above steaming heap of dried pigeon-vomit, Dreckery. If I
> >> ever said such a thing, I'd be guilty of gross calumny.
> >
> > You're confused already, PJR?
>
> Not confused, but baffled. After five years, I thought I knew all
> there was to know about the behaviour of stupid people on Usenet, but
> you've succeeded in demonstrating a new twist.
>
> Let me try to spell it out for you:
>
> If you post a link to show that you wrote "Kamper Buns" or whatever
> the dreck is called, and then claim that your link proves me a liar,
> YOU ALSO HAVE TO SHOW THAT I SAID YOU DIDN'T WRITE IT.

Why is that? You're well aware I wrote it, as you're no doubt well
aware that Cook took it, recorded a version of it and posted it under
his name.

By showing that I wrote it I also show that Cook stole "Karma Bombs"
from me.

> Got it yet?
>
> I wouldn't accuse even Sharon McElroy of writing your dreck. Even she
> wrote a tolerable first draft once in a hundred attempts.
>
> Dammit, I wouldn't accuse even K*nny "I wish I were a snowflake
> dancing in the sky" Ch*ffin of writing your dreck!
>
> Have you yet understood that nobody who had half a brain and more
> blood than alcohol in his or her veins would WANT to be identified as
> the author of your dreck?

Cook could have been simply too stupid to /remember/ to credit me then.

Either way, he fucked up royally, as usual.

> > The discussion was about Michael Cook /stealing/ the poem "Karma Bombs".
>
> What discussion? A few hours ago, I demonstrated, for the umpteenth
> time, that you're a lying thief who lies about Michael Cook and steals
> his work.

I wrote "Karma Bombs"... Cook swiped it and recorded it without giving
me credit. Plagiarism by ommission,

> Now, I'm just smacking you around until a more entertaining
> loon shows up, not attempting to discuss anything with you. If I ever
> thought you were capable of rational discussion, that would make me a
> kook just like you.
>
> >> <snip Dreckery trying to divert attention from his attempt to make a
> >> dollar by stealing>
> >
> > It's my writing, so the above comment is impossibly stupid.
>
> I think Jimmy Page should post an MP3 of Frank Zappa's recording of
> "Stairway to Heaven" at lulu.com and charge a dollar for each
> download. It's his writing, after all!
>
> M O R O N .

Hey, dig this PJR: Do you think Frank Zappa would have recorded
"Stairway To Heaven" and tried to pass it off as his own by not giving
/any/ credit to Page?

That's what Cook did with "Karma Bombs".

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 5:53:58 PM1/16/06
to

Peter J Ross wrote:
> >> >Will Dockery wrote:
>
> >> > "Karma Bombs" by Will Dockery, posted to Usenet November 5 2002: <http://tinyurl.com/bbzt6>
> >>
> >> [link to dreck snipped]
> >>
> >> >> <link snipped because somebody might read it and want to poke their
> >> >> eyes out with red-hot needles>
> >> >>
> >> >> > See link above, pathetic lying hypocrite.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please show me the post where I claimed that anybody other than you
> >> >> wrote the above steaming heap of dried pigeon-vomit, Dreckery. If I
> >> >> ever said such a thing, I'd be guilty of gross calumny.
> >> >
> >> > You're confused already, PJR?
> >>
> >> Not confused, but baffled. After five years, I thought I knew all
> >> there was to know about the behaviour of stupid people on Usenet, but
> >> you've succeeded in demonstrating a new twist.
> >>
> >> Let me try to spell it out for you:
> >>
> >> If you post a link to show that you wrote "Kamper Buns" or whatever
> >> the dreck is called, and then claim that your link proves me a liar,
> >> YOU ALSO HAVE TO SHOW THAT I SAID YOU DIDN'T WRITE IT.
> >
> > Why is that? You're well aware I wrote it,
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> *ding*! Dreckery at last understands something!

>
> > as you're no doubt well
> > aware that Cook took it, recorded a version of it and posted it under
> > his name.
>
> Michael's name is Will Dockery? It's the first I've heard of it. Post
> proof, please.
>
> Or post proof that he posted the recording with an author's name other
> than "Will Dockery", if you prefer.

>
> > By showing that I wrote it I also show that Cook stole "Karma Bombs"
> > from me.
>
> I can prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that T S Eliot wrote _The
> Waste Land_, and I have a recording of it, made by Alec Guinness, in
> which T S Eliot's name *isn't mentioned once*, all the way through the
> tape! What a naughty bad thief Alec Guinness was!

Bet the jacket or the label dedn't read "by Alec Guinness", though.

> >> Got it yet?
> >>
> >> I wouldn't accuse even Sharon McElroy of writing your dreck. Even she
> >> wrote a tolerable first draft once in a hundred attempts.
> >>
> >> Dammit, I wouldn't accuse even K*nny "I wish I were a snowflake
> >> dancing in the sky" Ch*ffin of writing your dreck!
> >>
> >> Have you yet understood that nobody who had half a brain and more
> >> blood than alcohol in his or her veins would WANT to be identified as
> >> the author of your dreck?
> >
> > Cook could have been simply too stupid to /remember/ to credit me then.
>

> He DID credit you, you idiotic, moronic, cretin. What part of "by Will
> Dockery" is too complicated for you to understand?

That would have been excellent... /if/ he had done that, PJR.

> > Either way, he fucked me up royally, as usual.
> ^^
> Typo fixed.
>
> This must be one of the greatest one-on-one trolls in history.
> Dreckery is still whining after YEARS have passed. All hail God, alias
> Michael Cook!


>
> >> > The discussion was about Michael Cook /stealing/ the poem "Karma Bombs".
> >>
> >> What discussion? A few hours ago, I demonstrated, for the umpteenth
> >> time, that you're a lying thief who lies about Michael Cook and steals
> >> his work.
> >
> > I wrote "Karma Bombs"...
>

> And you're drunk enough to admit it.
>
> Dammit, I wrote a sonnet about flowers when I was nine, but I'm not
> going to post it to three million newsgroups and boast about it.


>
> > Cook swiped it and recorded it without giving
> > me credit. Plagiarism by ommission,
>

> What part of "by Will Dockery" is too polysyllabic for your cockroach
> brain to process?

Cook's post reads: "by Michael Cook".

> >> Now, I'm just smacking you around until a more entertaining
> >> loon shows up, not attempting to discuss anything with you. If I ever
> >> thought you were capable of rational discussion, that would make me a
> >> kook just like you.
> >>
> >> >> <snip Dreckery trying to divert attention from his attempt to make a
> >> >> dollar by stealing>
> >> >
> >> > It's my writing, so the above comment is impossibly stupid.
> >>
> >> I think Jimmy Page should post an MP3 of Frank Zappa's recording of
> >> "Stairway to Heaven" at lulu.com and charge a dollar for each
> >> download. It's his writing, after all!
> >>
> >> M O R O N .
> >
> > Hey, dig this PJR: Do you think Frank Zappa would have recorded
> > "Stairway To Heaven" and tried to pass it off as his own by not giving
> > /any/ credit to Page?
>

> It says here, in the liner notes for the double CD that you'll always
> be too poor to afford, right up to the day when you die with the words
> "Dammit, there were one or two newsgroups I forgot to crosspost my
> dreck to!" on your lips:
>
> STAIRWAY TO HEAVEN
> words & music: Jimmy Page and Robert Plant
>
> So, unlike you, FZ wasn't a thief. Your point?


>
> > That's what Cook did with "Karma Bombs".

It would have made a difference if Cook /had/ done that.

> *sigh*
>
> "by Will Dockery"
> "by Will Dockery"
> "by Will Dockery"
> "by Will Dockery"
> "by Will Dockery"
> "by Will Dockery"
> "by Will Dockery"
> "by Will Dockery"
> "by Will Dockery"

Better late than never!

ggamble

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 6:15:06 PM1/16/06
to
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:08:28 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:

>my writing is impossibly stupid.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 6:16:17 PM1/16/06
to
On 16 Jan 2006 13:24:04 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 6:42:55 PM1/16/06
to

Peter J Ross wrote:
> > Will Dockery wrote:
>
> >> > Cook could have been simply too stupid to /remember/ to credit me then.
> >>
> >> He DID credit you, you idiotic, moronic, cretin. What part of "by Will
> >> Dockery" is too complicated for you to understand?
> >
> > That would have been excellent... /if/ he had done that, PJR.
>
> <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
>
> | From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
> | Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
> | Subject: Text to Speech
> | Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
> | Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
> |
> | Text to Speech

> |
> | From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> | Karma Bombs.mp3
>
> What part of "by Will Dockery" are you still too mind-bogglingly
> moronic to understand?
>
> And nearly twenty-five months later you're still whining and lying
> about it, while the truth remains available "IN THE ARCHIVES".
>
> I hereby nominate Will "Drunkery" Dockery for the Office of Darth Bawl
> (alias Usenet's Biggest Crybaby), to serve in the month of February
> 2006. After all, if he can whine, lie and cry his piggy litle eyes out
> for more than two years, he's unlikely ever to stop.
>
> Seconds?

Well, damn!

Cook's not so bad after all!

As far as the nomination goes... I refer you to PT Barnum's statement
on publicity.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 7:05:48 PM1/16/06
to
On 16 Jan 2006 15:42:55 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>


>As far as the nomination goes... I refer you to PT Barnum's statement
>on publicity


>4. Requires excessive admiration
>
>Translation: Excessive in two ways: they want praise, compliments, deference, and expressions of envy all the time, and they want to be told that everything they do is better than what others can do. Sincerity is not an issue here; all that matter are frequency and volume.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 7:15:40 PM1/16/06
to
> Dreckery ACCEPTS the nomination

Heh... like I have a /choice/?

Have your revenge... I'll just use it in the "publicity machine".

ggamble

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 7:18:43 PM1/16/06
to
On 16 Jan 2006 16:15:40 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'll just use it in the "publicity machine".


Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 7:28:00 PM1/16/06
to

"ggamble" wrote:

> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>
> > I'll just use it in the "publicity machine".
>
> >4. Requires excessive admiration
> >
> >Translation: Excessive in two ways: they want praise, compliments,
deference, and expressions of envy all the time, and they want to be told
that everything they do is better than what others can do. Sincerity is not
an issue here; all that matter are frequency and volume.

"Without publicity, a terrible thing happens - nothing!"
-P.T. Barnum --

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 8:31:56 PM1/16/06
to

"Peter J Ross" wrote:
> > "ggamble" wrote:
> >> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>
> >> > I'll just use it in the "publicity machine".
> >>
> >> >4. Requires excessive admiration
> >> >
> >> >Translation: Excessive in two ways: they want praise, compliments,
> > deference, and expressions of envy all the time, and they want to be
told
> > that everything they do is better than what others can do. Sincerity is
not
> > an issue here; all that matter are frequency and volume. And
> > stealing sound recordings while accusing the creators of the said
> > sound recordings of stealing them.

"Karma Bombs" /was/ used without permission.

> You misssed a bit off the end.


>
> > "Without publicity, a terrible thing happens - nothing!"
> > -P.T. Barnum --
>

> "If a Dockery fell off the stage in a bar and nobody was listening,
> would he make a whining noise?" - George Berkeley

Depends on how I landed...

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 16, 2006, 8:50:24 PM1/16/06
to
> Are you looking for a Drama Queen

Is Uncle Hammes lost?

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 12:00:28 AM1/17/06
to

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 12:01:28 AM1/17/06
to

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 9:22:44 AM1/17/06
to

Meat Plow wrote:
> > Peter J Ross wrote:
>
> >>> >>>> > Cook could have been simply too stupid to /remember/ to credit me
> >>> >>>> > then.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> He DID credit you, you idiotic, moronic, cretin. What part of "by
> >>> >>>> Will Dockery" is too complicated for you to understand?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> That would have been excellent... /if/ he had done that, PJR.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> | From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
> >>> >> | Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
> >>> >> | Subject: Text to Speech
> >>> >> | Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
> >>> >> | Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
> >>> >> |
> >>> >> | Text to Speech
> >>> >> |
> >>> >> | From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> >>> >> | Karma Bombs.mp3

Still he had no permission to use my work... at least I got some use
from his theft.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 9:26:04 AM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 06:22:44 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>theft

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 10:02:17 AM1/17/06
to

Meat Plow wrote:
>
> >>> >> <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> | From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
> >>> >> | Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
> >>> >> | Subject: Text to Speech
> >>> >> | Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
> >>> >> | Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
> >>> >> |
> >>> >> | Text to Speech
> >>> >> |
> >>> >> | From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> >>> >> | Karma Bombs.mp3
> >>> >>
>
> I'll sixth it just because of the duration and intensity

That reminds me, Meat: you never /did/ post an Mp3 of that music of
yours that you claimed was so much better than mine... Karla even
claimed to have heard it!

Maybe in 2006, eh?

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 10:30:55 AM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 07:02:17 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> you claimed

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 11:34:48 AM1/17/06
to

"Beloved Won" wrote:
> "Vampi Fangs" wrote:
>
> > the hapless dookie is certainly in fabulous k00k form ... and greatly
> > deserves his nomination
>
> Heh... Vampi, idiot.
>
> Are you as stupid as your name?

She's some kind of goth wannabe?

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 12:09:10 PM1/17/06
to

"Peter J Ross" wrote:
> Will Dockery wrote:
> > "Beloved Won" wrote:
> >> "Vampi Fangs" wrote:
>
> >> > the hapless dookie is certainly in fabulous k00k form ... and greatly
> >> > deserves his nomination
> >>
> >> Heh... Vampi, idiot.
> >>
> >> Are you as stupid as your name?
> >
> > She's some kind of goth wannabe?
>
> You might find out if you weren't suddenly afraid to crosspost.

I've read the FAQ.

Beloved Won

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 12:32:21 PM1/17/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message news:44663$43cd24b7$18d62363$69...@KNOLOGY.NET...

>
> "Peter J Ross" wrote:
>> Will Dockery wrote:
>> > "Beloved Won" wrote:
>> >> "Vampi Fangs" wrote:
>>
>> >> > the hapless dookie is certainly in fabulous k00k form ... and greatly
>> >> > deserves his nomination
>> >>
>> >> Heh... Vampi, idiot.
>> >>
>> >> Are you as stupid as your name?
>> >
>> > She's some kind of goth wannabe?
>>
>> You might find out if you weren't suddenly afraid to crosspost.
>
> I've read the FAQ.

I remember, I think.

People on Usenet are very likely to be stupid.

I just want to sneak in, deliver some porn,
and tip-toe out. :)

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 2:05:51 PM1/17/06
to
Will Dockery wrote:

>
> It was mine when Cook stole it, and it's /mine/ now.
>

Sounds like your Bishop taught you your Litany well.
Did he teach you his soft, Protestant "hand"-shake as well?

--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
In Victorian times, a "swell" was a frog in his Prince phase.
By the Depression, "swell" was the frog's *feeling* on being
"kissed" into a Prince. Thus, the Depression.
http://scrawlmark.org

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 2:23:02 PM1/17/06
to
Will Dockery wrote:

> "Peter J Ross" wrote:
>
>>>Will Dockery wrote:
>>
>>> "Karma Bombs" by Will Dockery, posted to Usenet November 5 2002:
>
> <http://tinyurl.com/bbzt6>
>
>><link snipped because somebody might read it and want to poke their
>>eyes out with red-hot needles>
>>
>>>See link above, pathetic lying hypocrite.
>>
>>Please show me the post where I claimed that anybody other than you
>>wrote the above steaming heap of dried pigeon-vomit, Dreckery. If I
>>ever said such a thing, I'd be guilty of gross calumny.
>
>
> You're confused already, PJR?
>
> The discussion was about Michael Cook /stealing/ the poem "Karma Bombs".
>

Couldn'a been.
He didn't.
I read a lotta /swill/ about how he did, but it was all yours.
Just don't get any on the pizzas.

>
>><snip Dreckery trying to divert attention from his attempt to make a
>>dollar by stealing>
>
>
> It's my writing, so the above comment is impossibly stupid.
>

It's your writing, so the above comment is impossibly stupid.

--

Karla

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 1:46:15 PM1/17/06
to
In article <1137510136.9...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Will Dockery
says...

>
>
>Meat Plow wrote:
>>
>> >>> >> <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> | From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
>> >>> >> | Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
>> >>> >> | Subject: Text to Speech
>> >>> >> | Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
>> >>> >> | Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
>> >>> >> |
>> >>> >> | Text to Speech
>> >>> >> |
>> >>> >> | From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
>> >>> >> | Karma Bombs.mp3
>> >>> >>
>>
>> I'll sixth it just because of the duration and intensity
>
>That reminds me, Meat: you never /did/ post an Mp3 of that music of
>yours that you claimed was so much better than mine... Karla even
>claimed to have heard it!

Others did too:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.arts.poetry.comments/msg/8830645b953720eb?dmode=source&hl=en

You just didn't like their reviews:

"Honestly, that "singing" sounds like a pig giving birth."

"Seriously.. that "singing" sounds like aliens coming out of a chest."

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 2:27:18 PM1/17/06
to

Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
> Will Dockery wrote:
>
> > "Karma Bombs" by Will Dockery, posted to Usenet November 5 2002:
> > <http://tinyurl.com/bbzt6>
>
> It's your writing

Got /that/ right, Uncle.

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 2:35:07 PM1/17/06
to
Will Dockery wrote:

>
> Cook took Cook took Cook took Cook took
> Cook took Cook took Cook took Cook took
> Cook took Cook took Cook took Cook took
> Cook took Cook took Cook took Cook took
> Cook k00k Cook k00k Cook k00k Cook k00k
> Cook k00k Cook k00k Cook k00k Cook k00k
> k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k
> k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k
> k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k
> k00k k00k k00k k00k k00k
> k00k k00k k00k k00k
> k00k k00k k00k
> k00k k00k
> k00k k00k
> k00k k00k
> k00k
> k00k
> k00k
> k00
> k00
> k
> k
> k

>
> That's what Cook did with "Karma Bombs".
>

There, there.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 2:44:10 PM1/17/06
to

Karla, you were confused [or lying] then, and you're apparently
confused [or lying] now:

What I wrote was that you claimed to have listened to an Mp3 of Meat
Plow's song, and declared it "better" than mine.

Meat never posted an Mp3 of a song, and in fact later admitted that he
doesn't even /write songs/... only plays guitar on covers.

Reviews are reviews, but you never heard MP -you couldn't have since he
never made anything available- but pretended to.

Hope that clears your confusion up for now.

Beloved Won

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 2:45:29 PM1/17/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" <scraw...@arvig.net> wrote in message news:BfidnYltkJ6...@onvoy.com...

> Will Dockery wrote:
>
>>
>> It was mine when Cook stole it, and it's /mine/ now.
>>
>
> Sounds like your Bishop taught you your Litany well.

NO, wormy boi...

Technically, cook has some rights on the derived copy,
but please...

What in the fuck would anyone do with a TTS version
of a Dockery poem???????

Unusable as a letter opener or door jam, it isn't fire-retardant
and doesn't float... :()

Take heart.. With enough stagger it sings like the anchovies
doing the backstroke in a bottle of Dicky.


> Did he teach you his soft, Protestant "hand"-shake as well?

I love the gay way your lips move when you chalk.

...and I'm so cool. :)

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 3:05:45 PM1/17/06
to

Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
> Will Dockery wrote:
>
> > It was mine when Cook stole it, and it's /mine/ now.
>
> Sounds like your Bishop taught you your Litany well.

If someone stole one of /your/ poems, you'd burble a very different
"Litany", no doubt.

Makes a big difference when it you're actually in the position of being
stolen ftom.

Karla

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 3:11:36 PM1/17/06
to
In article <1137527050....@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Will Dockery
says...

>
>
>Karla wrote:
>> Will Dockery says...
>> >Meat Plow wrote:
>>
>>>> >>> >> <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
>> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>> >> | From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
>> >> >>> >> | Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
>> >> >>> >> | Subject: Text to Speech
>> >> >>> >> | Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
>> >> >>> >> | Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
>> >> >>> >> |
>> >> >>> >> | Text to Speech
>> >> >>> >> |
>> >> >>> >> | From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
>> >> >>> >> | Karma Bombs.mp3
>> >> >>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I'll sixth it just because of the duration and intensity
>> >
>> >That reminds me, Meat: you never /did/ post an Mp3 of that music of
>> >yours that you claimed was so much better than mine... Karla even
>> >claimed to have heard it!
>>
>> Others did too:
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.arts.poetry.comments/msg/8830645b953720eb?dmode=source&hl=en
>>
>> You just didn't like their reviews:
>>
>> "Honestly, that "singing" sounds like a pig giving birth."
>>
>> "Seriously.. that "singing" sounds like aliens coming out of a chest."
>
>What I wrote was that you claimed to have listened to an Mp3 of Meat
>Plow's song, and declared it "better" than mine.

It IS better than yours. Mice singing to each other is better than yours. I
can make that claim without listening to any Mp3. And I treble dog dare you to
post where I claimed to listen to an Mp3.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 3:37:09 PM1/17/06
to

Karla wrote:
> >> Will Dockery says...
> >> >Meat Plow wrote:
>
> >>>> >>> >> <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> | From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
> >> >> >>> >> | Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
> >> >> >>> >> | Subject: Text to Speech
> >> >> >>> >> | Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
> >> >> >>> >> | Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
> >> >> >>> >> |
> >> >> >>> >> | Text to Speech
> >> >> >>> >> |
> >> >> >>> >> | From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> >> >> >>> >> | Karma Bombs.mp3
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I'll sixth it just because of the duration and intensity
> >> >
> >> >That reminds me, Meat: you never /did/ post an Mp3 of that music of
> >> >yours that you claimed was so much better than mine... Karla even
> >> >claimed to have heard it!
> >>
> >> Others did too:
> >>
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.arts.poetry.comments/msg/8830645b953720eb?dmode=source&hl=en
> >>
> >> You just didn't like their reviews:
> >>
> >> "Honestly, that "singing" sounds like a pig giving birth."
> >>
> >> "Seriously.. that "singing" sounds like aliens coming out of a chest."
> >
> >What I wrote was that you claimed to have listened to an Mp3 of Meat
> >Plow's song, and declared it "better" than mine.
>
> It IS better than yours.

Little matters like actually /hearing/ Meat's song, and the fact that
he's stated he doesn't even /write songs/ make no difference to you,
duly noted.

> Mice singing to each other is better than yours. I
> can make that claim without listening to any Mp3.

And again.

> And I treble dog dare you to
> post where I claimed to listen to an Mp3.

And what will you do when I /do/ produce the post, Karla?

Admit you were confused? Admit you lied? Both?

Or vanish for a while until this newest confused burble of yours is
forgotten?

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 3:41:12 PM1/17/06
to
Will Dockery wrote:

> Peter J Ross wrote:
>
>>>Will Dockery wrote:
>>

>>>>>Cook could have been simply too stupid to /remember/ to credit me then.
>>>>
>>>>He DID credit you, you idiotic, moronic, cretin. What part of "by Will
>>>>Dockery" is too complicated for you to understand?
>>>
>>>That would have been excellent... /if/ he had done that, PJR.
>>

>><http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
>>
>>| From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
>>| Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
>>| Subject: Text to Speech
>>| Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
>>| Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
>>|
>>| Text to Speech
>>|
>>| From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
>>| Karma Bombs.mp3
>>

>>What part of "by Will Dockery" are you still too mind-bogglingly
>>moronic to understand?
>>
>>And nearly twenty-five months later you're still whining and lying
>>about it, while the truth remains available "IN THE ARCHIVES".
>>
>>I hereby nominate Will "Drunkery" Dockery for the Office of Darth Bawl
>>(alias Usenet's Biggest Crybaby), to serve in the month of February
>>2006. After all, if he can whine, lie and cry his piggy litle eyes out
>>for more than two years, he's unlikely ever to stop.
>>
>>Seconds?
>
>
> Well, damn!
>
> Cook's not so bad after all!
>
> As far as the nomination goes... I refer you to PT Barnum's statement
> on publicity.
>

So will Charles Manson and William Clinton.
But that's only because they're still alive.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 3:42:38 PM1/17/06
to

Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
>
> >>>><http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
> >>>>
> >>>>| From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
> >>>>| Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
> >>>>| Subject: Text to Speech
> >>>>| Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
> >>>>| Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
> >>>>|
> >>>>| Text to Speech
> >>>>|
> >>>>| From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> >>>>| Karma Bombs.mp3
> >>>>
>
> The "Mirror Twins" thread is that long all by itself.

With a thousand bugfuck posts by Uncle Hammes alone.

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 3:43:59 PM1/17/06
to
Will Dockery wrote:

> Peter J Ross wrote:
>
>>>Will Dockery wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>Cook could have been simply too stupid to /remember/ to credit me then.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>He DID credit you, you idiotic, moronic, cretin. What part of "by Will
>>>>>>Dockery" is too complicated for you to understand?
>>>>>
>>>>>That would have been excellent... /if/ he had done that, PJR.
>>>>

>>>><http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
>>>>
>>>>| From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
>>>>| Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
>>>>| Subject: Text to Speech
>>>>| Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
>>>>| Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
>>>>|
>>>>| Text to Speech
>>>>|
>>>>| From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
>>>>| Karma Bombs.mp3
>>>>

>>>>What part of "by Will Dockery" are you still too mind-bogglingly
>>>>moronic to understand?
>>>>
>>>>And nearly twenty-five months later you're still whining and lying
>>>>about it, while the truth remains available "IN THE ARCHIVES".
>>>>
>>>>I hereby nominate Will "Drunkery" Dockery for the Office of Darth Bawl
>>>>(alias Usenet's Biggest Crybaby), to serve in the month of February
>>>>2006. After all, if he can whine, lie and cry his piggy litle eyes out
>>>>for more than two years, he's unlikely ever to stop.
>>>>
>>>>Seconds?
>>>
>>>Well, damn!
>>>
>>>Cook's not so bad after all!
>>>
>>>As far as the nomination goes... I refer you to PT Barnum's statement
>>>on publicity.
>>

>>Dreckery ACCEPTS the nomination
>
>
> Heh... like I have a /choice/?
>
> Have your revenge... I'll just use it in the "publicity machine".
>

"...gamble, gamble, peeble-robble, Darbawl!"

We know.

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 3:46:12 PM1/17/06
to
Will Dockery wrote:

> "ggamble" wrote:
>
>>"Will Dockery" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I'll just use it in the "publicity machine".
>>
>>>4. Requires excessive admiration
>>>
>>>Translation: Excessive in two ways: they want praise, compliments,
>
> deference, and expressions of envy all the time, and they want to be told
> that everything they do is better than what others can do. Sincerity is not
> an issue here; all that matter are frequency and volume.
>
> "Without publicity, a terrible thing happens - nothing!"
> -P.T. Barnum --
>

"All this publicity, a terrible thing happens -- nothing!"
-- William Jefferson Dockery

Beloved Won

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 4:16:53 PM1/17/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1137527050....@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

They don't read you, any more than they read me.
They scan, and have a feeling.

>

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 4:19:02 PM1/17/06
to
Will Dockery wrote:

>
> "Karma Bombs" /was/ used without permission.
>

"...a karba, karba, karba, karba, karba,
ee-yay, ee-yay, ee-yay, ee-yay."

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 4:25:36 PM1/17/06
to

Beloved Won wrote:
> "Will Dockery" wrote:

Karla tries to read it, then she sees the /little black spots/ shoves a
twinkie in her face and has an orgasm.

Ever notice how Karla's posts of poetry almost always sink into the
archives without comment?

Nan porbably has a saying to fit that sad situation.

Beloved Won

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 4:27:23 PM1/17/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" <scraw...@arvig.net> wrote in message news:9tmdndXsX9X...@onvoy.com...

> Will Dockery wrote:
>
>>
>> "Karma Bombs" /was/ used without permission.
>>
>
> "...a karba, karba, karba, karba, karba,
> ee-yay, ee-yay, ee-yay, ee-yay."

I've never read it but I always like a lot of parmesan.

It's sharp, but I can cut it.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 6:39:48 PM1/17/06
to

Karla wrote:
> >> Will Dockery says...
> >> >Meat Plow wrote:
>
> >>>> >>> >> <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> | From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
> >> >> >>> >> | Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
> >> >> >>> >> | Subject: Text to Speech
> >> >> >>> >> | Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
> >> >> >>> >> | Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
> >> >> >>> >> |
> >> >> >>> >> | Text to Speech
> >> >> >>> >> |
> >> >> >>> >> | From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> >> >> >>> >> | Karma Bombs.mp3
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I'll sixth it just because of the duration and intensity
> >> >
> >> >That reminds me, Meat: you never /did/ post an Mp3 of that music of
> >> >yours that you claimed was so much better than mine... Karla even
> >> >claimed to have heard it!
> >>
> >What I wrote was that you claimed to have listened to an Mp3 of Meat
> >Plow's song, and declared it "better" than mine.
>
> I can make that claim without listening to any Mp3. And I treble dog dare you to
> post where I claimed to listen to an Mp3.

You claimed to have either heard Meat Plow on Mp3 /or/ in person.

You wrote: "It WAS better than your stuff. In fact, it was so good, we
were *begging* him for his band's credits."

I wrote: "Not only could Meat Plow *not* produce an Mp3 of his music to
support his claims... he later admitted that he doesn't even *write*
music, only does cover tunes... yet could *still* not produce evidence
of even that."

You wrote: "Again, you are mistaken. His stuff blows you out of the
backwater. "

So, did you actually hear Meat Plow's music, Karla? Not his songs,
because he doesn't write songs, as explained earlier.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 6:44:05 PM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 11:27:18 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:


>> It's impossibly stupid

>Got /that/ right, Uncle.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 6:44:33 PM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 12:05:45 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>If someone stole one of /your/ poems

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 6:45:06 PM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 11:44:10 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> you were confused [or lying] then, and you're apparently
>confused [or lying] now:

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 6:50:33 PM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 12:37:09 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>


oh sweet jesus fuck

Are you going to whine and cry and snivel and complain about this
fucken non issue for the next hundred thousand years?

You can't sing
You can't write
If it wasn't for the internet, you'd have no reason to live

You lie
You smear
You're a hypocrite and a moron

A thousand drunk soldiers at the karaoke bar not booing you off the
stage is not a tacit admission of your precious genius.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 6:51:01 PM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 13:25:36 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> has an orgasm.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 6:51:18 PM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 13:25:36 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> into the
>archives

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 6:51:38 PM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 12:42:38 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> a thousand bugfuck posts

Karla

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 6:49:25 PM1/17/06
to
In article <1137541188.9...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, Will Dockery
says...

>
>
>Karla wrote:
>> >> Will Dockery says...
>> >> >Meat Plow wrote:
>>
>>>>>> >>> >>
>><http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> | From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
>> >> >> >>> >> | Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
>> >> >> >>> >> | Subject: Text to Speech
>> >> >> >>> >> | Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
>> >> >> >>> >> | Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
>> >> >> >>> >> |
>> >> >> >>> >> | Text to Speech
>> >> >> >>> >> |
>> >> >> >>> >> | From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
>> >> >> >>> >> | Karma Bombs.mp3
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'll sixth it just because of the duration and intensity
>> >> >
>> >> >That reminds me, Meat: you never /did/ post an Mp3 of that music of
>> >> >yours that you claimed was so much better than mine... Karla even
>> >> >claimed to have heard it!
>> >>
>> >What I wrote was that you claimed to have listened to an Mp3 of Meat
>> >Plow's song, and declared it "better" than mine.
>>
>>I can make that claim without listening to any Mp3. And I treble dog dare you
>>to
>> post where I claimed to listen to an Mp3.
>
>You claimed to have either heard Meat Plow on Mp3 /or/ in person.
>
>You wrote: "It WAS better than your stuff. In fact, it was so good, we
>were *begging* him for his band's credits."

You lost. In other words, LOSER!

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 7:17:21 PM1/17/06
to

You actually listened to Meat Plow's music? Not his /songs/ because he
doesn't write songs, but his music... and if so, where, on Mp3 or in
person?

--
The Netherlands/Shadowville cross cultural exchange
project <http://www.kannibaal.nl/shadowville.htm>

Greybeard Cavalier [Dockery/0x0000]: <http://tinyurl.com/7r7gj>

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 7:22:56 PM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 15:39:48 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> he doesn't write songs

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 7:37:11 PM1/17/06
to

ggamble wrote:
>
> he doesn't write songs

Yeah, MP wrote that he only plays covers of songs... not that Karla
would know the difference, apparently.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 7:53:32 PM1/17/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 16:37:11 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>would know the difference,

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 8:08:03 PM1/17/06
to

"Karla" <kar...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:dqjvq...@drn.newsguy.com...

>>You wrote: "It WAS better than your stuff. In fact, it was so good, we
>>were *begging* him for his band's credits."
>
> You lost. In other words, LOSER!

Where do you think you win?

I respond to your questions, poem requests,
and you come back to Dockery, with this.

And YANAL... :()

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 17, 2006, 8:33:53 PM1/17/06
to

Beloved Too wrote:
> "Karla" wrote...

>
> >>You wrote: "It WAS better than your stuff. In fact, it was so good, we
> >>were *begging* him for his band's credits."
> >
> > You lost. In other words, LOSER!
>
> Where do you think you win?
>
> I respond to your questions, poem requests,
> and you come back to Dockery, with this.
>
> And YANAL... :()

She got a rush after deep thrating a box of Twinkies.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 12:11:46 AM1/18/06
to
On 17 Jan 2006 17:33:53 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> deep thrating

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 9:47:41 AM1/18/06
to
Karla wrote:
> >> Will Dockery says...
>
> >> <http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
> >>
> >> >> >>> >> | From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
> >> >> >>> >> | Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
> >> >> >>> >> | Subject: Text to Speech
> >> >> >>> >> | Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
> >> >> >>> >> | Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
> >> >> >>> >> |
> >> >> >>> >> | Text to Speech
> >> >> >>> >> |
> >> >> >>> >> | From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> >> >> >>> >> | Karma Bombs.mp3
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I'll sixth it just because of the duration and intensity
> >> >
> >> >That reminds me, Meat: you never /did/ post an Mp3 of that music of
> >> >yours that you claimed was so much better than mine... Karla even
> >> >claimed to have heard it!
> >
> >What I wrote was that you claimed to have listened to an Mp3 of Meat
> >Plow's song, and declared it "better" than mine.
>
> It IS better than yours.

Meat himself wrote that he doesn't even write songs, so your judgement
is worthless, which is to be expected from a thug-wannabe like you,
Karla.

> Mice singing to each other is better than yours.

So you /have/ heard MP's recordings of cover material, then?

> I can make that claim without listening to any Mp3.

So you /haven't/ heard MP's recordings of cover material, then?

IOW: You're just tootin' your Twinkie?

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 1:14:31 PM1/18/06
to

"Berryman's Legacy" wrote:

> On 2006-01-17 Gary Gamble said:
>
> > whine and cry and snivel and complain
> >
> > You can't write
>
> ---
> See Gary Gamble's picture at The Net Poets Photo Gallery!
> ALL your favorite on-line poets in one convenient location.
> http://NetPoets.here.nu

In passing, an interesting quote drom the original thread PJR found and
posted that showed Michael Cook's theft of "Karma Bombs" [though he /did/
credit me as the writer]:

"Tom writes well, always has, just the rest of ain't so nice, what a waste."
-Michael Cook on the poetry of Tom Bishop

----
Text to Speech

From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
Karma Bombs.mp3

From "Strange People in Isle 9"
Ladies,.mp3

From "Give Anna a Personality for Christmas"
Anna.mp3

Control conversion
The_Gods_of_the_Copy.mp3
----

PJR and others are on record with opinions that taking and using poetry
written by [even /with/ attribution] is theft... so, thanks for proving me
correct, pal.

Michael Cook is a thief, but likes Bishop's poetry... heh.

ggamble

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 1:26:08 PM1/18/06
to
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:14:31 -0500, "Will Dockery"
<will_d...@knology.net> wrote:


theft
thef
thief

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 1:27:33 PM1/18/06
to

Barbara's Cat wrote:
>
> > In passing, an interesting quote [ pizzabitchbabblewhine snipped ]
>
> Not really. Honest.

Coming from Cook, it was.

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 2:29:22 PM1/18/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message news:1cdc7$43ce8586$18d62363$32...@KNOLOGY.NET...

>
> "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
>> On 2006-01-17 Gary Gamble said:
>>
>> > whine and cry and snivel and complain
>> >
>> > You can't write
>>
>> ---
>> See Gary Gamble's picture at The Net Poets Photo Gallery!
>> ALL your favorite on-line poets in one convenient location.
>> http://NetPoets.here.nu
>
> In passing, an interesting quote drom the original thread PJR found and
> posted that showed Michael Cook's theft of "Karma Bombs" [though he /did/
> credit me as the writer]:
>
> "Tom writes well, always has, just the rest of ain't so nice, what a waste."
> -Michael Cook on the poetry of Tom Bishop

Ummm....
Yes. A website that reconstructs the history of mikey's
idiocy is coming. I have a /little/ time.


The 1st approximation:

mikey: ghetto-idiot that hounded chuck (as-if) == he was
more talented: ripped my picture for gay porn lames.

The Amazing Jinn: <heh>


> ----
> Text to Speech
>
> From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> Karma Bombs.mp3
>
> From "Strange People in Isle 9"
> Ladies,.mp3
>
> From "Give Anna a Personality for Christmas"
> Anna.mp3
>
> Control conversion
> The_Gods_of_the_Copy.mp3
> ----
>
> PJR and others are on record with opinions that taking and using poetry
> written by [even /with/ attribution] is theft... so, thanks for proving me
> correct, pal.

Variously, peewee sez what the fuck she thinks pisses off whoever,
or sucks up to whoever. peewee is smirt enough to be derivative.
Unlike you... stay precious, God.

>
> Michael Cook is a thief, but likes Bishop's poetry... heh.

I am the Jinn.

:)

Love ya, God.


--
AJ - http://clitin.com
(the biggest clit in pornetry)

Renay

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 4:03:24 PM1/18/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message
news:1cdc7$43ce8586$18d62363$32...@KNOLOGY.NET...
>
> "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
>> On 2006-01-17 Gary Gamble said:
>>
>> > whine and cry and snivel and complain
>> >
>> > You can't write
>>
>> ---
>> See Gary Gamble's picture at The Net Poets Photo Gallery!
>> ALL your favorite on-line poets in one convenient location.
>> http://NetPoets.here.nu
>
> In passing, an interesting quote drom the original thread PJR found and
> posted that showed Michael Cook's theft of "Karma Bombs" [though he /did/
> credit me as the writer]:

how could a poem be stolen if you're credited as the writer?

nevermind.

there's not enough time in the eons for you to
figure out a way to pull this one out of your ass.

Renay

ggamble

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 4:06:45 PM1/18/06
to
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:03:24 -0800, "Renay" <rena...@yahoo.com>
wrote:


If someone identified me as the writer of "Karma Bombs" I'd sue his
ass off.

Just kidding dinkery, don't get any ideas!

I can just see his little pointed head just spinning now.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 4:19:11 PM1/18/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" wrote

> Will Dockery wrote:
>
><http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
> >
> >>>>| From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
> >>>>| Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
> >>>>| Subject: Text to Speech
> >>>>| Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
> >>>>| Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
> >>>>|
> >>>>| Text to Speech
> >>>>|
> >>>>| From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> >>>>| Karma Bombs.mp3

Cook's not so bad after all! Seems I've read some complaints from poets here
in the past about their poems being taken and used without permission,
though.

They /might/ say Cook is a poetry thief.

> >>>As far as the nomination goes... I refer you to PT Barnum's statement
> >>>on publicity... I'll just use it in the "publicity machine".
>
> We know.

So keep those electric cards and letters coming, folks!

Ring-a-ding-ding.

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 4:37:36 PM1/18/06
to

"Renay" <rena...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:McqdnaQzUKa...@comcast.com...

How could a ghetto moron find happiness on a bedpan.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 4:47:20 PM1/18/06
to
Renay wrote:

> "Will Dockery" wrote:
> > "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
> >> On 2006-01-17 Gary Gamble said:
> >>
> >> > whine and cry and snivel and complain
> >> >
> >> > You can't write
> >>
> >> ---
> >> See Gary Gamble's picture at The Net Poets Photo Gallery!
> >> ALL your favorite on-line poets in one convenient location.
> >> http://NetPoets.here.nu
> >
> > In passing, an interesting quote drom the original thread PJR found and
> > posted that showed Michael Cook's theft of "Karma Bombs" [though he /did/
> > credit me as the writer]:
>
> how could a poem be stolen if you're credited as the writer?

Taken, recorded and posted on someone elses' website.

You /really/ would have no problem if someone you were not friends with
took, say, "Spectre", recorded it on an Mp3, and posted it on their
website?

I know Rik and Joy's answer... how about you, Renay?

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 4:55:02 PM1/18/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1137620840....@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

> Renay wrote:
>> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>> > "Berryman's Legacy" wrote:
>> >> On 2006-01-17 Gary Gamble said:
>> >>
>> >> > whine and cry and snivel and complain
>> >> >
>> >> > You can't write
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> See Gary Gamble's picture at The Net Poets Photo Gallery!
>> >> ALL your favorite on-line poets in one convenient location.
>> >> http://NetPoets.here.nu
>> >
>> > In passing, an interesting quote drom the original thread PJR found and
>> > posted that showed Michael Cook's theft of "Karma Bombs" [though he /did/
>> > credit me as the writer]:
>>
>> how could a poem be stolen if you're credited as the writer?
>
> Taken, recorded and posted on someone elses' website.
>
> You /really/ would have no problem if someone you were not friends with
> took, say, "Spectre", recorded it on an Mp3, and posted it on their
> website?
>
> I know Rik and Joy's answer... how about you, Renay?

Your whine is as dumbshit as Rik and Joy, God.

Sometimes you are terminally stupid.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 5:12:17 PM1/18/06
to

Beloved Too wrote:

> >> "Will Dockery" wrote:
>
> >> >> > whine and cry and snivel and complain
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You can't write
> >> >>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> See Gary Gamble's picture at The Net Poets Photo Gallery!
> >> >> ALL your favorite on-line poets in one convenient location.
> >> >> http://NetPoets.here.nu
> >> >
> >> > In passing, an interesting quote drom the original thread PJR found and
> >> > posted that showed Michael Cook's theft of "Karma Bombs" [though he /did/
> >> > credit me as the writer]:
> >>
> >> how could a poem be stolen if you're credited as the writer?
> >
> > Taken, recorded and posted on someone elses' website.
> >
> > You /really/ would have no problem if someone you were not friends with
> > took, say, "Spectre", recorded it on an Mp3, and posted it on their
> > website?
> >
> > I know Rik and Joy's answer... how about you, Renay?
>
> Your whine is as dumbshit as Rik and Joy

Just using those two as an example of two people that claim someone
stole their poetry, although the alleged thief /did/ give them credit
lines.

If the other guy was a thief, then Cook is one in /spades/.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 6:24:38 PM1/18/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" wrote > Will Dockery wrote:
>
>><http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
> >>
> >>| From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
> >>| Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
> >>| Subject: Text to Speech
> >>| Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
> >>| Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
> >>|
> >>| Text to Speech
> >>|
> >>| From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> >>| Karma Bombs.mp3
> >
> > Cook's not so bad after all!
> >
> > I refer you to PT Barnum's statement
> > on publicity.
>
> So will Charles Manson

Only heard one of his songs, the one GnR covered...

> and William Clinton.
> But that's only because they're still alive.

Heh.. not a Clinton fan, Uncle?

> -------(m+
> ~/:o)_|
> In Victorian times, a "swell" was a frog in his Prince phase.
> By the Depression, "swell" was the frog's *feeling* on being
> "kissed" into a Prince. Thus, the Depression.
> http://wormfarmer.blogspot.com/

Heh.

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 7:09:19 PM1/18/06
to

Beloved Too wrote:
> >Will Dockery wrote:
>
> > In passing, an interesting quote from the original thread PJR found and

> > posted that showed Michael Cook's theft of "Karma Bombs" [though he /did/
> > credit me as the writer]:
> >
> > "Tom writes well, always has, just the rest of ain't so nice, what a waste."
> > -Michael Cook on the poetry of Tom Bishop
>
> Ummm....
> Yes. A website that reconstructs the history of mikey's
> idiocy is coming. I have a /little/ time.
>
> The 1st approximation:
>
> mikey: ghetto-idiot that hounded chuck (as-if) == he was
> more talented: ripped my picture for gay porn lames.
>
> The Amazing Jinn: <heh>

Bring back Pertial.

> > ----
> > Text to Speech
> >
> > From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
> > Karma Bombs.mp3
> >
> > From "Strange People in Isle 9"
> > Ladies,.mp3
> >
> > From "Give Anna a Personality for Christmas"
> > Anna.mp3
> >
> > Control conversion
> > The_Gods_of_the_Copy.mp3
> > ----
> >
> > PJR and others are on record with opinions that taking and using poetry
> > written by [even /with/ attribution] is theft... so, thanks for proving me
> > correct, pal.
>
> Variously, peewee sez what the fuck she thinks pisses off whoever,
> or sucks up to whoever.

The boy talks a good game:

----
"Don't imagine that this is some kind of trivial Usenet flame war in
which the people who are against "us" can reasonably side with Tommy
because he's also against "us". Net-abuse of this kind affects *all*
of us, whichever "side" we're usually on, and the abuser needs to be
ostracised whether he says flattering things about you or not."
-Peter J. Ross on copyright theft/net abuse.
----

Now what was it this "Tommy" guy did to rile PJR up with this pep talk?

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 7:43:23 PM1/18/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1137629359.5...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

>
> Beloved Too wrote:
>> >Will Dockery wrote:
>>
>> > In passing, an interesting quote from the original thread PJR found and
>> > posted that showed Michael Cook's theft of "Karma Bombs" [though he /did/
>> > credit me as the writer]:
>> >
>> > "Tom writes well, always has, just the rest of ain't so nice, what a waste."
>> > -Michael Cook on the poetry of Tom Bishop
>>
>> Ummm....
>> Yes. A website that reconstructs the history of mikey's
>> idiocy is coming. I have a /little/ time.
>>
>> The 1st approximation:
>>
>> mikey: ghetto-idiot that hounded chuck (as-if) == he was
>> more talented: ripped my picture for gay porn lames.
>>
>> The Amazing Jinn: <heh>
>
> Bring back Pertial.

In time, I'll bring back VASTLY more. :)

Ummm... missed this. Let him put up his: "/pjr/tom1.jpg"
If he doesn't I will.

I'll make certain UP understands the pissant --the ghetto-boi,
and the wormy-boi.

Pity mikey is so stupid. Having smirt-morons like wormy and peewee
to humble is a bit fun, but mikey is just a dull thud.

>
> Now what was it this "Tommy" guy did to rile PJR up with this pep talk?

Gee, Will... I am the Jinn.
I've always been the Jinn.

peewee saw it early, and thought he could fuck with the Jinn.

Naaah....

Brit-faggots aren't good pizza. - Denny Crane

--
AJ - http://clitin.com
(the biggest clit in pornetry)

>

Renay

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 7:51:03 PM1/18/06
to

"Beloved Too" <ajinnN...@here.nu> wrote in message
news:LgBzf.11829$F_3....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...

> Brit-faggots aren't good pizza. - Denny Crane

WS just sold a kidney stone for some ungodly amount.
50k, I think. an ungodly amount for a kidney stone.
pittance for the actual kidney, I suppose.

Renay

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 7:55:59 PM1/18/06
to

That's why you're the moderator of the newsgroups.

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 9:05:26 PM1/18/06
to

"Renay" <rena...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:6cmdnYOM8Kn...@comcast.com...

A Kidak moment?

I liked ST, but Kirk was a little Pentecostal.

--
I typed this message from a fairly /ergo/-standing
position. This is one weird setup, but keyboards are
better off split. Blogspot to follow...

Now if I could only stop killing
the neighbor's pets.

O well, Nome wasn't melt in a day.

Tomorrow I'll fine tune the Tesla coils...

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 18, 2006, 9:23:31 PM1/18/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1137632159.8...@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Why? ...do I look like a Cub Scout Den Motha?

I'm happier if the turds piss off.

I have to provide a pissant soup kitchen too?

--
AJ - http://clitin.com
(the biggest clit in pornetry)

>

ggamble

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 12:30:27 AM1/19/06
to
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:51:03 -0800, "Renay" <rena...@yahoo.com>
wrote:


I think it was 25k
the proceeds went to charity.

Renay

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 12:50:46 AM1/19/06
to

"ggamble" <f...@net.com> wrote in message
news:3u8us1l8ot5tbsn8f...@4ax.com...

I think you're right about the amount. Habitat for
Humanity was the charity, I'm pretty sure, because
he said the sale made enough to build half a house
and I wondered what kind of a house you could
build for 50k. so that's where I came up with the
number I originally posted. still, it's an ungodly


amount for a kidney stone.

yay for him for doing it, though.

Renay

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 3:55:49 AM1/19/06
to
ggamble wrote:

> On 17 Jan 2006 07:02:17 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>you claimed
>
>
>
>>Sincerity is not an issue here; all that matter are frequency and volume.


"All in all is all we are."

--

-------(m+
~/:o)_|
In Victorian times, a "swell" was a frog in his Prince phase.
By the Depression, "swell" was the frog's *feeling* on being
"kissed" into a Prince. Thus, the Depression.

http://scrawlmark.org

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 4:05:03 AM1/19/06
to
Karla wrote:

> In article <1137541188.9...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>, Will Dockery
> says...


>
>>
>>Karla wrote:
>>
>>>>>Will Dockery says...
>>>>>

>>>>>>Meat Plow wrote:
>>>
>>><http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.arts.poems/msg/3ea330d2bd2b6070>
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>| From: "Michael Cook" <cook368NOS...@ameritech.net>
>>>>>>>>>>>>| Newsgroups: alt.arts.poetry.comments,rec.arts.poems
>>>>>>>>>>>>| Subject: Text to Speech
>>>>>>>>>>>>| Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:13:23 -0500
>>>>>>>>>>>>| Message-ID: <bs6qvc$a82dr$1...@ID-206016.news.uni-berlin.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>|

>>>>>>>>>>>>| Text to Speech
>>>>>>>>>>>>|
>>>>>>>>>>>>| From "Karma Bombs. by Will Dockery"
>>>>>>>>>>>>| Karma Bombs.mp3
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>I'll sixth it just because of the duration and intensity
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That reminds me, Meat: you never /did/ post an Mp3 of that music of
>>>>>>yours that you claimed was so much better than mine... Karla even
>>>>>>claimed to have heard it!
>>>>>
>>>>What I wrote was that you claimed to have listened to an Mp3 of Meat
>>>>Plow's song, and declared it "better" than mine.
>>>

>>>I can make that claim without listening to any Mp3. And I treble dog dare you
>>>to
>>>post where I claimed to listen to an Mp3.
>>
>>You claimed to have either heard Meat Plow on Mp3 /or/ in person.


>>
>>You wrote: "It WAS better than your stuff. In fact, it was so good, we
>>were *begging* him for his band's credits."
>
>
> You lost. In other words, LOSER!
>

Trouble is, he's so illiterate that /you/ insist Meat "wrote songs"
when you remarked his "singing."
And, Karla, /everybody/ knows you can't poast .mp3s unless you
write songs.
Which would mean that /anybody's/ better'n Dockery, as my band
writes songs by Mozart and Chopin.

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 4:36:28 AM1/19/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" <scraw...@arvig.net> wrote in message news:He2dne1BAfa...@onvoy.com...

Sound like you and gamble, among others.

>>>Sincerity is not an issue here; all that matter are frequency and volume.
>
>
> "All in all is all we are."

Perhaps you could FOAD.

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 4:37:00 AM1/19/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" <scraw...@arvig.net> wrote in message news:bv2dnR-WA5Kny1Le...@onvoy.com...

moron.

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 4:41:30 AM1/19/06
to
Will Dockery wrote:

> Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
>
>>Will Dockery wrote:
>>
>>

>>>It was mine when Cook stole it, and it's /mine/ now.
>>
>>Sounds like your Bishop taught you your Litany well.
>
>
> If someone stole one of /your/ poems, you'd burble a very different
> "Litany", no doubt.


The Bishop is stealing them as I write this.
I refer you to P.T. Barnum.

>
> Makes a big difference when it you're actually in the position of being
> stolen ftom.
>

You Japanese dictionally busted is.
I never had it a being stolen ftom.

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 4:43:21 AM1/19/06
to
ggamble wrote:

> On 17 Jan 2006 12:05:45 -0800, "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com>


> wrote:
>
>
>>If someone stole one of /your/ poems
>
>

But, gg.
"Makes a big difference when it you're actually in the position."
-- William Jefferson Dockery

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 5:05:45 AM1/19/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" <scraw...@arvig.net> wrote in message news:s6ednW4i-ZR...@onvoy.com...

> Will Dockery wrote:
>
>> Dennis M. Hammes wrote:
>>
>>>Will Dockery wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>It was mine when Cook stole it, and it's /mine/ now.
>>>
>>>Sounds like your Bishop taught you your Litany well.
>>
>>
>> If someone stole one of /your/ poems, you'd burble a very different
>> "Litany", no doubt.
>
>
> The Bishop is stealing them as I write this.

Where?
Can you prove that you wrote the poems in question?
Are you sure they weren't retyped... heh...

> I refer you to P.T. Barnum.

Where you have a job as a clown?

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 5:07:12 AM1/19/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" <scraw...@arvig.net> wrote in message news:s6ednWki-ZS...@onvoy.com...

> But, gg, stalker moron.


> "Makes a big difference when it you're actually in the position."
> -- William Jefferson Dockery

typo corrected

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 5:03:54 AM1/19/06
to
Beloved Too wrote:

> "Will Dockery" <will.d...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1137629359.5...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
>>Beloved Too wrote:
>>
>>>>Will Dockery wrote:
>>>

*kiss*--------------->*swell*
*swell*<---------------*kiss*
*kiss*--------------->*swell*
*swell*<---------------*kiss*
*kiss*--------------->*swell*
*swell*<---------------*kiss*
*kiss*--------------->*swell*
*swell*<---------------*kiss*
...

Look, Master, here comes two Jewish* caterpillars.

__________
* bowing

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 5:07:52 AM1/19/06
to
Renay wrote:

Will Shatner, $25,000, "charity."
Leno? Letterman? Ferguson? Conan?
Remote was so fast tonight they blurred.

Kidney stones are routinely (if not often) mounted as jewelry,
usually one's own.

Dennis M. Hammes

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 5:14:26 AM1/19/06
to
Will Dockery wrote:

> Beloved Too wrote:
>
>>>>"Will Dockery" wrote:
>>
>>>>>> > whine and cry and snivel and complain
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > You can't write
>>>>>>
>>>>>>---
>>>>>>See Gary Gamble's picture at The Net Poets Photo Gallery!
>>>>>>ALL your favorite on-line poets in one convenient location.
>>>>>>http://NetPoets.here.nu
>>>>>
>>>>>In passing, an interesting quote drom the original thread PJR found and
>>>>>posted that showed Michael Cook's theft of "Karma Bombs" [though he /did/
>>>>>credit me as the writer]:
>>>>
>>>>how could a poem be stolen if you're credited as the writer?
>>>
>>>Taken, recorded and posted on someone elses' website.
>>>
>>>You /really/ would have no problem if someone you were not friends with
>>>took, say, "Spectre", recorded it on an Mp3, and posted it on their
>>>website?
>>>
>>>I know Rik and Joy's answer... how about you, Renay?
>>
>>Your whine is as dumbshit as Rik and Joy
>
>
> Just using those two as an example of two people that claim someone
> stole their poetry, although the alleged thief /did/ give them credit
> lines.
>
> If the other guy was a thief, then Cook is one in /spades/.
>

Then he's a much more competent thief than you are.
Pretty hard to steal anything from Wal-Mart, especially a spade.

"Security to spades, please, security to spades. See the pizzaboi
trying to stick a spade up his hotpocket. Well, he's doing it blade
first."

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 6:12:52 AM1/19/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" <scraw...@arvig.net> wrote in message news:g6mdnQ8TI-G...@onvoy.com...

>
> Look, Master, here comes two Jewish* caterpillars.

Did you have some pricksucking thing to say, idiot?

A kook death-threat of th day, perhaps...

Whine about your failed career some more, 'ennis.

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 6:14:30 AM1/19/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" <scraw...@arvig.net> wrote in message news:JYmdnbwYrtlp-VLe...@onvoy.com...

> Renay wrote:
>
>> "Beloved Too" <ajinnN...@here.nu> wrote in message news:LgBzf.11829$F_3....@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...
>>
>>
>>>Brit-faggots aren't good pizza. - Denny Crane
>>
>>
>> WS just sold a kidney stone for some ungodly amount.
>> 50k, I think. an ungodly amount for a kidney stone.
>> pittance for the actual kidney, I suppose.
>>
>> Renay
>>
>
> Will Shatner, $25,000, "charity."
> Leno? Letterman? Ferguson? Conan?
> Remote was so fast tonight they blurred.
>
> Kidney stones are routinely (if not often) mounted as jewelry, usually one's own.

I still have the traction lag bolt that was screwed into my hip
for 3 months. It would look good in your head.

Installation: FREE

Will Dockery

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 6:43:09 AM1/19/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:
> Will Dockery wrote:
>
> The Bishop is stealing them as I write this.
> I refer you to P.T. Barnum.
>
> > Makes a big difference when it you're actually in the position of being
> > stolen ftom.
>
> You Japanese dictionally busted is.
> I never had it a being stolen ftom.

No, I copped it from Rob yesterday, Uncle:

"I've written lots so fat this year and done two 40 minute gigs already this
January..." -Rob Evans

I told him to leave Joy out of this.

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 6:47:29 AM1/19/06
to

"Dennis M. Hammes" <scraw...@arvig.net> wrote in message news:W6qdneAi7c3...@onvoy.com...

>> If the other guy was a thief, then Cook is one in /spades/.
>>
>
> Then he's a much more competent thief than you are.

Is that why he lives in a low-income, ghetto project?

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 7:04:06 AM1/19/06
to

"Will Dockery" <will_d...@knology.net> wrote in message news:330ea$43cf7ba2$18d62363$29...@KNOLOGY.NET...

>
> "Dennis M. Hammes" wrote:
>> Will Dockery wrote:
>>
>> The Bishop is stealing them as I write this.
>> I refer you to P.T. Barnum.
>>
>> > Makes a big difference when it you're actually in the position of being
>> > stolen ftom.
>>
>> You Japanese dictionally busted is.
>> I never had it a being stolen ftom.
>
> No, I copped it from Rob yesterday, Uncle:
>
> "I've written lots so fat this year and done two 40 minute gigs already this
> January..." -Rob Evans
>
> I told him to leave Joy out of this.

Heh.
But don't put down Rob too much.
He probably makes a few hundred a year from poetry.
Probably not, but the Jinn is jinerous.
(obviously Sheard got unlisted, and is just another loser)

How's the babe scene in SVK(Shadowville Kingdom)?

Let's talk about babes, so they don't think we're gay. :)


--
AJ - http://clitin.com
(the biggest clit in pornetry)

>

Beloved Too

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 7:04:36 AM1/19/06
to

"Beloved Too" <ajinnN...@here.nu> wrote in message news:l%Kzf.10669$_S7....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...

>
> "Dennis M. Hammes" <scraw...@arvig.net> wrote in message news:W6qdneAi7c3...@onvoy.com...
>
>>> If the other guy was a thief, then Cook is one in /spades/.
>>>
>>
>> Then he's a much more competent thief than you are.
>
> Is that why he lives in a low-income, ghetto project?

Like this one???
http://tinyurl.com/c3fmv

ggamble

unread,
Jan 19, 2006, 10:47:02 AM1/19/06
to
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:50:46 -0800, "Renay" <rena...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

With the Habitat projects, they build quite modest houses and all the
labour and a substantial portion of the materials are donated.
One of their biggest challenges, of course, is acquiring the land.

In Canada, their houses are averaging 50 bucks a sq.ft., with the
average house costing between 60k-120k CanDollars.

So maybe Captain Kirk misspoke, but like you said:
good for him.

It's a great organization, and they welcome all volunteers, even those
with little or no building experience.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages