Re: USA History

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 6/17/2013 3:59 PM, Max Boot wrote:
> On 6/17/2013 5:30 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
>> "Tom Gardner" <Mars@Tacks> wrote in message
>> news:MbudnYYOE9IUYyPM...@giganews.com...
>>
>>> Obammy hasn't done anything to improve anything. So, you admit he's
>>> impotent and inept? Do you love him because of the free phone or
>>> because you were told to?
>>
>> Libs know they are better because they keep telling themselves so.
>
> Leftists are to blame for the collapse of standards in the US.

The "Republicans" are to blame for letting the Leftists get away with
lowering the standards.


McCain's and all the rest of the RINO's that want to work with liberals
are the real problem, Obama has us targeted as his enemy and we have the
likes of McCain that want to be nice to Obama....

Why the hell don't they kick him in the balls every chance they get?

When someone tells you that you're his enemy and he wants to punish you,
you can take him at his word. You don't need to interpret that and
figure out that he really likes you but he was upset because he slammed
his dick in that bathroom door this morning. Just take it at face value
and treat the man accordingly.


We did this same dance with Bin Laden and Saddam Husein and they were
both telling us they hate us and we are their enemy, it took the idiots
in Congress and the Presidents 12 years to figure out these murderers
wanted to kill us.... something I knew in 12 minutes.



--



*Rumination*
#29 - For your WELFARE there's the CHINESE MASTERCARD, but Freedom is
priceless.

[Johnny Football]

Republicans are the poison by which America has fallen

[Topaz]

The West is the White race.

The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
multi-culture and pluralism they push is only at the expense of
Whites. No one is trying to push multi-culture in China or Japan or
anyplace but on the Whites. And they promote racial intermarriage.
If things continue as they are the White race is doomed.

And who is doing all of this? It is the USA government and the
media, in other words the Jews.

Many Whites are traitors. They support the USA government and their
own destruction. We should look for allies. And anyone who wants to
remove the Jews from power is our ally. In the past the Japanese were
our allies. Today it is the Muslims.

Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan

"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it
is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the
U.S. is not uttering a single word."



http://www.ihr.org/ http://nationalvanguard.org/ http://heretical.com/

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com

[Johnny Football]

On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:24:12 -0500, Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Wow, you are one messed up fuck.
what does this have to do with gun rights anyway?

[Topaz]

In addition to that below, Jews have funded and run most anti-RTKBA
organizations. Their plans for globalist dictator-ship cannot be
implemented so long as patriotic Americans have the means to resist -
as guaranteed them by the Founders.

Jews and U.S. Gun Control Legislation, 1968-Present
Note: this webpage is a work-in-progress. More information will be
added later. This information shows that, contrary to some claims,
Jews have sponsored or co-sponsored most modern anti-gun legislation.

1968: The Gun Control Act of 1968 comes from Jewish Rep. Emanuel
Celler's House bill H.R. 17735. It expands legislation already
attempted by the non-Jewish Sen. Thomas Dodd. America's biggest and
most far-reaching gun law came from a Jew [1].

1988: Senate bill S. 1523 is sponsored by Jewish Senator Howard
Metzenbaum. It proposes legislation turning every violation of the Gun
Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense, allowing a gun
owner to be charged with federal racketeering offenses.

1988: Senator Metzenbaum co-sponsors a bill-S. 2180 -- to ban, or
limit/restrict, so-called "plastic guns."

1990: Jewish Senator Herbert Kohl introduces bill S.2070, the Gun-Free
School Zones Act of 1990, which bans gun possession in a school zone.
The law will later be struck down in court as unconstitutional.
1993: Senate bill S.653 is sponsored by Sen. Howard Metzenbaum. It
bans specific semiautomatic rifles, but also gives the Secretary of
the Treasury the power to add any semiautomatic firearm to the list at
a later date.

February, 1994: The Brady Law, which requires waiting periods to buy
handguns, becomes effective. Senator Metzenbaum wrote the Brady Bill.
Metzenbaum sponsored the bill in the Senate. The sponsor of the bill
in the House was Jewish Rep. Charles Schumer [2].

1994: Senator Metzenbaum introduces S.1878, the Gun Violence
Prevention Act of 1994, aka "Brady II." Rep. Schumer sponsored "Brady
II" sister legislation [H.R. 1321] in the U.S. House of
Representatives.

September, 1994: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of
1994 goes into effect, including a provision that bans the manufacture
and possession of semiautomatic rifles described as "assault weapons."
[Note: true assault weapons are fully automatic, not semiautomatic].
That gun-ban provision was authored in the Senate by Jewish Senator
Dianne Feinstein and authored in the House by Congressman Schumer.

1995: Jewish Senators Kohl, Specter, Feinstein, Lautenberg and others
introduce the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, an amended version of
the 1990 school-zone law which was struck down in court as being
unconstitutional.

September, 1996: The Lautenberg Domestic Confiscation provision
becomes law. It is part of a larger omnibus appropriations bill. It
was sponsored by Jewish Senator Frank Lautenberg. It bans people
convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from ever owning a gun.

1997: Senate bill S. 54, the Federal Gang Violence Act of 1997,
proposes much harsher sentences for people violating minor gun laws,
including mandatory prison sentences and forfeiture of property. It
was introduced by Dianne Feinstein and a non-Jewish Senator [Hatch],
among others. It returns the idea of turning every violation of the
Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense.

January, 1999: Jewish Senator Barbara Boxer introduces bill S.193, the
American Handgun Standards Act of 1999.

January, 1999: Senator Kohl introduces bill S.149, the Child Safety
Lock Act of 1999. It would to require a child safety lock in
connection with transfer of a handgun.

February, 1999: Senator Frank Lautenberg introduces bill S.407, the
Stop Gun Trafficking Act of 1999.

February, 1999: Senator Lautenberg introduces S.443, the Gun Show
Accountability Act of 1999.

March, 1999: Senator Lautenberg introduces bill S.560, the Gun
Industry Accountability Act of 1999.

March, 1999: Senator Feinstein introduces bill S.594, the Large
Capacity Ammunition Magazine Import Ban Act of 1999.

May, 2000: Senate bill S. 2515, Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale
Act of 2000, is submitted by Senators Feinstein, Senator Barbara
Boxer, Sen. Lautenberg and Sen. Schumer. It is a plan for a national
firearms licensing system.

January, 2001: Senate bill S.25, Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale
Act of 2001, is sponsored by Feinstein, Schumer, and Boxer. It is a
nation-wide gun registration plan [apparently there were two versions
of that Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act bill].

May, 2003: Senators Feinstein, Schumer, Boxer and others introduce
legislation that would reauthorize the 1994 federal assault weapons
ban, and, close a loophole in the law that allows large-capacity
ammunition magazines to be imported into the U.S. The ban is scheduled
to expire in September, 2004.

October, 2003: Senators Feinstein, Lautenberg, Levin [also Jewish] and
Schumer co-sponsor bill S.1774, designed to stop the sunset [ending]
of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.

March, 2005: Senator Lautenberg introduces bill S.645, "to reinstate
the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act," in
other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as
the "Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994"] which
expired in late 2004.

March, 2005: Senator Feinstein introduces bill S.620, "to reinstate
the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act," in
other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as
the "Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994"] which
expired in late 2004.

[1] Celler's bill as the base or foundation of the Gun Control Act of
1968: Here or Here
http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/lopez/5thcir.htm
http://www.guncite.com/journals/hardfopa.html#fn102

[2] a long list of the anti-gun bills sponsored by Schumer, Here
[footnote #36]
http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/Healey1.htm

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 6/18/2013 2:06 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:38:56 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
> <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/18/2013 1:31 PM, Ed Huntress wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:55:55 -0400, BeamMeUpScotty
>>> <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The preamble says " *PROMOTE* the general welfare ".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Promoting does NOT mean to *PROVIDE* general welfare
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So the Preamble ACTUALLY says that giving money away is beyond the
>>>> limited authority that the Constitution should give to the GOVERNMENT.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How many times does it have to be stuck under your nose before it
>>> sinks in? The men who SIGNED the Constitution disagree. They ought to
>>> know, right?
>>>
>>> Madison took the limited view you're talking about. Hamilton took the
>>> opposite view. Washington, by his actions, took Hamilton's view. So
>>> did Adams. And Jefferson was somewhere in between:
>>
>> I'm telling you what is *ACTUALLY IN THE CONSTITUTION* you are telling
>> me what you think SHOULD BE IN THE CONSTITUTION....
>
> You're telling us what you think the Founders *should* have meant. I'm
> telling you what they actually meant, by their words and their
> actions.

NO, I used the actual text to tell you what it says NOT what it meant...
you used conjecture to tell me what you think they wanted but didn't
actually write in the constitution.

>
> They debated and signed the thing.

The "thing" is the end of the discussion on what they wanted.

NOW you want to try to rewrite it without signing your new copy into law.

It says what it says, NOT what "you" think they wanted it to say.

[BeamMeUpScotty]

On 6/20/2013 12:36 AM, Nickname unavailable wrote:

> On Jun 17, 2:59 pm, Max Boot <max.b...@lathymes.com> wrote:
>> On 6/17/2013 5:30 AM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
>>
>>> "Tom Gardner" <Mars@Tacks> wrote in message
>>> news:MbudnYYOE9IUYyPM...@giganews.com...
>>
>>>> Obammy hasn't done anything to improve anything. So, you admit he's
>>>> impotent and inept? Do you love him because of the free phone or
>>>> because you were told to?
>>
>>> Libs know they are better because they keep telling themselves so.
>>

>> Leftists are to blame for the collapse of standards in the US. Leftists
>> have given us AYSO soccer, where "every kid is a winner," even though
>> the majority of them can't play the fucking game. Leftists are to blame
>> for schools replacing "my child is an honor student" bumper stickers
>> with the vacuous, nauseating "my child was honored" stickers (you know
>> you're in a minority urban neighborhood when you see those.)
>>
>> Leftists want to punish success. They hate achievers.
>
> the people who ran america from 1933-1981, who delivered the highest
> standard of living to its people, the world has ever seen.
> year in, year out,

They have been bleeding the Nation dry and left us in a Mediocracy that
produces NOTHING but RED ink and gay rights.... and now today we're in
debt and out of testosterone thanks to the leaders from about 1913 forward.


Which makes it look like the last good years may have been before
Woodrow Wilson and the Progressives and the Progressives IRS and Income
Tax and multitude of other FAILED policies like prohibition and Welfare.


Had they followed the constitution rather than setting out to corrupt
it, things would be far better.




--



*Rumination*
#19 - Deciding how much Socialism is too much, is like deciding how much
dog shit in your ice cream is too much.