Re: Global warming hoax expands...
Bret Cahill
> than *this* silliness. Oooooops:
>
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936328.ece
>
> Climate change data dumped
> Jonathan Leake, Environment Editor
>
> SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing
> away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of
> global warming are based.
>
> It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations
> said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
>
> The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss
> following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.
>
> The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then
> adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected.
> The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and
> magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new
> building.
>
> The admission follows the leaking of a thousand private emails sent and
> received by Professor Phil Jones, the CRU’s director. In them he
> discusses thwarting climate sceptics seeking access to such data.
>
> In a statement on its website, the CRU said: “We do not hold the
> original raw data but only the value-added (quality controlled and
> homogenised) data.”
>
> The CRU is the world’s leading centre for reconstructing past climate
> and temperatures. Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine
> exactly how its data were compiled. That is now impossible.
>
> Roger Pielke, professor of environmental studies at Colorado University,
> discovered data had been lost when he asked for original records. “The
> CRU is basically saying, ‘Trust us’. So much for settling questions and
> resolving debates with science,” he said.
>
> Jones was not in charge of the CRU when the data were thrown away in the
> 1980s, a time when climate change was seen as a less pressing issue. The
> lost material was used to build the databases that have been his life’s
> work, showing how the world has warmed by 0.8C over the past 157 years.
>
> He and his colleagues say this temperature rise is “unequivocally”
> linked to greenhouse gas emissions generated by humans. Their findings
> are one of the main pieces of evidence used by the Intergovernmental
> Panel on Climate Change, which says global warming is a threat to humanity.
We still get to drill for Arctic oil don't we?
Bret Cahill
Don Albasani
"Bret Cahill" <BretC...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:0582d1d4-11e7-4a94...@15g2000prz.googlegroups.com...
Bret Cahill
======
Only if you are a Bush or Cheney.
Michael Gordge
> Global warming hoax expands.
The size of a hoax matters not a flying a fuck ewe idiot.
MG
Don Albasani
"Michael Gordge" <mikeg...@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:f0c89718-1770-4184...@v15g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> Global warming hoax expands.
MG
==========
No one but Fox Noise can seem to explain this 'hoax'.
Bret Cahill
A few weeks ago rightards cheered potato farming in Greenland and the
prospects of oil drilling in the Arctic as proof that AGW was a good
thing.
This whole thing reminds me of the old chicken thief joke:
The chicken thief is arrested and taken before a judge. The chicken
thief's lawyer proves that the chicken thief wasn't in the area at the
time of the theft and introduced witnesses and other irrefutable
evidence. Eventually the judge declares the chicken thief innocent
and the chicken thief then asks the judge, "does this mean I get to
keep the chickens?"
Bret Cahill
Patriot Games
<BretC...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>> Why didn't they use the ol' "my dog ate it" line? Sounds more credible
>> than *this* silliness. Oooooops:
>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936328.ece
>> Climate change data dumped
>> Jonathan Leake, Environment Editor
>> SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing
>> away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of
>> global warming are based.
>> It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations
>> said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
>> The UEA�s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss
>> following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.
No.
------------------------------
Oil All Gone
Johan Leaky, Environmentalist
SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have announced that
all oil is now gone. No more oil. Especially no more oil in the
Arctic. An anticipated PEER-REVIEW of this announcement is underway
however SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) are having
difficulty locating the raw geological data and suggest maybe it was
thrown away with the raw temperature data on which their previous
predictions of global warming were based.
------------------------------
THIS JUST IN!
AP - 11/30/09
Beernut, GA - Failed President and Jesus-Wannabe Carpenter Jimmy
Carter made the following announcement today: "Global Warming
scientists are full of shit. There is no mo oil anyway. And nuclear
power made me the brain-damaged pussy I am today. Drink beer. All is
lost. And that Negro Presnit can kiss my 100% all-white ass!"
leona...@gmail.com
•• Cahill persists in demonstrating both
ignorance and stupidity once again.
— —
| In real science the burden of proof is always
| on the proposer, never on the sceptics. So far
| neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one
| iota of valid data for global warming nor have
| they provided data that climate change is being
| effected by commerce and industry, and not by
| natural phenomena
richp
wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
I propose there are no polar bears in Antarctica