The simple logic description of digital thinking
chengp...@my-deja.com
A network station, which perfectly combines rationalism, idealism with
realism.
The simple logic description of digital thinking:
From “there is no peony”, we cannot infer “there is no peony”,
which is an inference from many causes to a result; in the inference
from one cause to one result we can infer “there is no peony” from
“there is no peony”. From many causes to a result is just like the
method of digital thinking while from a cause to a result is just like
the method of mold. Here let me give an example.
Please draw a tree.
The way from a cause to a result is to give you a piece of paper, a
pen, and all sorts of paints. Then ask you to draw it out. In the mold
thinking people often draw the tree in their thought first. That is the
way.
The method of from many causes to a result is the principle of digital
cameras. That is, divide a screen into many small checks and equip each
check with color, bright and contrast according to the same principle
of electrical signals and finally scan out a beautiful tree on the
screen. So the method of from many causes to a result is to deal with
thousands of small checks with electromagnet signals. Its
characteristic is that we don’t need paper, pen and paint and only
need to set up many little checks of same nature.
You may notice that in the method of from many causes to a result we
need to use three little units like “here”, “there” and “peony”
so as to ascertain that “there is no peony”. The merit of the method
of from many causes to a result is that it does not need many little
units of same nature to finish and the conclusion it made is accurate
and reliable. It does not need materials of different size and nature
like paper, pen and paint.
You may have your own view that on some day in the future whether
humans are crazy about painting a tree with a pen or about scan a tree
with a digital camera?
Made by the research group of the universal flowers
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/