Atheistic argumentation and valuing is irrelevant.

[Nils Erik Forsberg]

That so because it is arguments based on the manifold differntiated
and changing appearences including our inventions and dreams, i.e
based on what we see and know. Mentality, nomenclature and valuing
becomes thereafter contradictory.

In that way it seems as thought on God is similar with imaginal
thought about Santa Claus.

In that way it is impossible to mentally clear understand that God,
the whole being we participate in, is the common substantial cause
behind all appearences and that St Claus is an invented appearence.

Nils F

[coben]

you country in general has a very good ability in english, but you
need work, if you care to communicate and not simply express your
thoughts.

*-----------------------*
Posted at:
www.GroupSrv.com
*-----------------------*

[Nils-Erik Forsberg]

On 20 Dec 2004 04:34:37 -0600,
loug...@hotmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (coben) wrote:

>you country in general has a very good ability in english, but you
>need work, if you care to communicate and not simply express your
>thoughts.

People in your country in general has very good training in english,
but anyhow it does not make sense what is said.

People debate, i.e fight mentally as at this group about truth which
is wrong.

The same as in all countries. It is a global spread habit.

Nils F

[Edgar Svendsen]

"Nils Erik Forsberg" <pros...@swipnet.se> wrote in message
news:41c68ba0...@nntpserver.swip.net...

Even if you are right, the appearances are all we have. While it may be
true that God is the the world and the cause of the world; all we know is
the world that we perceive. Anything else we say about God is human
speculation. We can say God has this motive or that motive or that God
causes this phenomenon or that phenomenon; but we don't really know that,
we would just be guessing.

Ed

> Nils F